Ventricular fibrillation/ventricular tachycardia within 72 h of VA-ECMO: incidence, outcomes, risk factors, and management.

AIMS: Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is an important technique for the treatment of refractory cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest; however, the early management of ventricular fibrillation/ventricular tachycardia (VF/VT), within 72 h of VA-ECMO, and its effects on patient prognosis remain unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively analysed patients at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University who underwent VA-ECMO between January 2017 and March 2022. The patients were divided into two groups, VF/VT and nVF/VT, based on whether or not VF/VT occurred within 72 h after the initiation of VA-ECMO. We utilized logistic regression analysis to evaluate the independent risk factors for VF/VT in patients undergoing VA-ECMO and to ascertain whether the onset of VF/VT affected 28 day survival rate, length of intensive care unit stay, and/or other clinical prognostic factors. Subgroup analysis was performed for the VF/VT group to determine whether defibrillation affected prognosis. In the present study, 126 patients were included, 65.87% of whom were males (83/126), with a mean age of 46.89 ± 16.23, a 28 day survival rate of 57.14% (72/126), an incidence rate of VF/VT within 72 h of VA-ECMO initiation of 27.78% (35/126), and 80% of whom (28/35) received extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The incidence of VF/VT resulting from cardiac arrest at an early stage was significantly higher than that of refractory cardiogenic shock (80% vs. 20%; P = 0.022). The restricted cubic spline model revealed a U-shaped relationship between VF/VT incidence and initial heart rate (iHR), and multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that an iHR > 120 b.p.m. [odds ratio (OR) 6.117; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.672-22.376; P = 0.006] and hyperlactataemia (OR 1.125; 95% CI 1.016-1.246; P = 0.023) within 1 h of VA-ECMO initiation were independent risk factors for the occurrence of VF/VT. VF/VT was not found to be associated with the 28 day survival of patients undergoing VA-ECMO support, nor did it affect other secondary endpoints. Defibrillation did not alter the overall prognosis in patients with VF/VT during VA-ECMO. CONCLUSIONS: An iHR > 120 b.p.m. and hyperlactataemia were independent risk factors for the occurrence of VF/VT within 72 h of VA-ECMO initiation. The occurrence of VF/VT does not affect, nor does defibrillation in these patients improve the overall patient prognosis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR1900026105.

Continuous assessment of ventricular fibrillation prognostic status during CPR: Implications for resuscitation.

BACKGROUND: Ventricular fibrillation (VF) waveform measures reflect myocardial physiologic status. Continuous assessment of VF prognosis using such measures could guide resuscitation, but has not been possible due to CPR artifact in the ECG. A recently-validated VF measure (termed VitalityScore), which estimates the probability (0-100%) of return-of-rhythm (ROR) after shock, can assess VF during CPR, suggesting potential for continuous application during resuscitation. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated VF using VitalityScore to characterize VF prognostic status continuously during resuscitation. METHODS: We characterized VF using VitalityScore during 60 seconds of CPR and 10 seconds of subsequent pre-shock CPR interruption in patients with out-of-hospital VF arrest. VitalityScore utility was quantified using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). VitalityScore trends over time were estimated using mixed-effects models, and associations between trends and ROR were evaluated using logistic models. A sensitivity analysis characterized VF during protracted (100-second) periods of CPR. RESULTS: We evaluated 724 VF episodes among 434 patients. After an initial decline from 0-8 seconds following VF onset, VitalityScore increased slightly during CPR from 8-60 seconds (slope: 0.18%/min). During the first 10 seconds of subsequent pre-shock CPR interruption, VitalityScore declined (slope: -14%/min). VitalityScore predicted ROR throughout CPR with AUCs 0.73-0.75. Individual VitalityScore trends during 8-60 seconds of CPR were marginally associated with subsequent ROR (adjusted odds ratio for interquartile slope change (OR) = 1.10, p = 0.21), and became significant with protracted (100 seconds) CPR duration (OR = 1.28, p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: VF prognostic status can be continuously evaluated during resuscitation, a development that could translate to patient-specific resuscitation strategies.

Assessment of emergency physicians' performance in identifying shockable rhythm in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: an observational simulation study.

BACKGROUND: Emergency physicians can use a manual or an automated defibrillator to provide defibrillation of patients who had out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Performance of emergency physicians in identifying shockable rhythm with a manual defibrillator has been poorly explored whereas that of automated defibrillators is well known (sensitivity 0.91-1.00, specificity 0.96-0.99). We conducted this study to estimate the sensitivity/specificity and speed of shock/no-shock decision-making by prehospital emergency physicians for shockable or non-shockable rhythm, and their preference for manual versus automated defibrillation. METHODS: We developed a web application that simulates a manual defibrillator (https://simul-shock.firebaseapp.com/). In 2019, all (262) emergency physicians of six French emergency medical services were invited to participate in a study in which 60 ECG rhythms from real OHCA recordings were successively presented to the physicians for determination of whether they would or would not administer a shock. Time to decision was recorded. Answers were compared with a gold standard (concordant answers of three experts). We report sensitivity for shockable rhythms (decision to shock) and specificity for non-shockable rhythms (decision not to shock). Physicians were also asked whether they preferred manual or automated defibrillation. RESULTS: Among 215 respondents, we were able to analyse results for 190 physicians. 57% of emergency physicians preferred manual defibrillation. Median (IQR) sensitivity for a shock delivery for shockable rhythm was 0.91 (0.81-1.00); median specificity for no-shock delivery for non-shockable rhythms was 0.91 (0.80-0.96). More precisely, sensitivities for shock delivery for ventricular tachycardia (VT) and coarse ventricular fibrillation (VF) were both 1.0 (1.0-1.0); sensitivity for fine VF was 0.6 (0.2-1). Specificity for not shocking a pulseless electrical activity (PEA) was 0.83 (0.72-0.86), and for asystole, specificity was 0.93 (0.86-1). Median speed of decision-making (in seconds) were: VT 2.0 (1.6-2.7), coarse VF 2.1 (1.7-2.9), asystole 2.4 (1.8-3.5), PEA 2.8 (2.0-4.2) and fine VF 2.8 (2.1-4.3). CONCLUSIONS: Global sensitivity and specificity were comparable with published automated external defibrillator studies. Shockable rhythms with the best clinical prognoses (VT and coarse VF) were very rapidly recognised with very good sensitivity. The decision-making for fine VF or asystole and PEA was less accurate.

Influence of "high" defibrillation thresholds on patient survival and impact of system modification.

OBJECTIVE: To test whether a high defibrillation threshold (DFT) marks patients with poor outcomes which are improved when DFT is decreased by system modification (subcutaneous coil implant; SM). BACKGROUND: The electrical substrate generating fast ventricular arrhythmias may generate poor outcomes among patients treated with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs), even when arrhythmias are treated successfully. Since patients with high DFTs have increased mortality, we contrasted survival among patients with high DFT treated with and without SM. METHODS: We studied consecutive patients undergoing ICD implantation and DFT testing at Cleveland Clinic over a 14-year period. High DFT was defined as successful defibrillation by shock strength >25 J or ≤10 J of maximal device output. Mortality was recorded using the Social Security Death Index. Survival was compared among those high DFT patients receiving SM versus the remainder. RESULTS: Out of 6353 patients tested, 191 (3%) had high DFT (32.1 ± 3.7 J) versus 13.9 ± 4.9 J in the remainder ("acceptable DFT," p < .001). One hundred twenty-one high DFT patients (63%; 33.3 ± 3.4 J) underwent SM, which significantly decreased DFT (24.8 ± 5.9 J; p < .001). Seventy patients (37%; 30.3 ± 3.3 J) did not undergo SM. During follow-up, 38% (2363/6162; 7.8 yrs) patients with acceptable DFT died versus 48% high DFT patients (91/191; 5.6 yrs.; p < .001). Concomitantly, 48% patients with SM (58/121) died, as compared to 47% patients (33/70) without SM (p = .91); median follow-up 4.9 yrs). CONCLUSION: Patients with high DFT have a higher mortality than those with acceptable DFT. The additional subcutaneous coil implant decreases DFT to an acceptable range but does not appear to improve survival. The electrical substrate underlying high DFT appears to determine survival.

Association between insurance status and in-hospital outcomes in patients with out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation arrest.

BACKGROUND: Lack of health insurance is associated with adverse clinical outcomes; however, the association between health insurance status and in-hospital outcomes after out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation (OHVFA) arrest is unclear. HYPOTHESIS: Lack of health insurance is associated with worse in-hospital outcomes after out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation arrest. METHODS: From January 2003 to December 2014, hospitalizations with a primary diagnosis of OHVFA in patients ≥18 years of age were extracted from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Patients were categorized into insured and uninsured groups based on their documented health insurance status. Study outcome measures were in-hospital mortality, utilization of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), and cost of hospitalization. Inverse probability weighting adjusted binary logistic regression was performed to identify independent predictors of in-hospital mortality and ICD utilization and linear regression was performed to identify independent predictors of cost of hospitalization. RESULTS: Of 188 946 patients included in the final analyses, 178 005 (94.2%) patients were insured and 10 941 (5.8%) patients were uninsured. Unadjusted in-hospital mortality was higher (61.7% vs. 54.7%, p < .001) and ICD utilization was lower (15.3% vs. 18.3%, p < .001) in the uninsured patients. Lack of health insurance was independently associated with higher in-hospital mortality (O.R = 1.53, 95% C.I. [1.46-1.61]; p < .001) and lower utilization of ICD (O.R = 0.84, 95% C.I [0.79-0.90], p < .001). Cost of hospitalization was significantly higher in uninsured patients (median [interquartile range], p-value) ($) (39 650 [18 034-93 399] vs. 35 965 [14 568.50-96 163], p < .001). CONCLUSION: Lack of health insurance is associated with higher in-hospital mortality, lower utilization of ICD and higher cost of hospitalization after OHVFA.

Ventricular arrhythmia burden during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.

AIMS: Our objective was to determine the ventricular arrhythmia burden in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) patients during COVID-19. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this multicentre, observational, cohort study over a 100-day period during the COVID-19 pandemic in the USA, we assessed ventricular arrhythmias in ICD patients from 20 centres in 13 states, via remote monitoring. Comparison was via a 100-day control period (late 2019) and seasonal control period (early 2019). The primary outcome was the impact of COVID-19 on ventricular arrhythmia burden. The secondary outcome was correlation with COVID-19 incidence. During the COVID-19 period, 5963 ICD patients underwent remote monitoring, with 16 942 episodes of treated ventricular arrhythmias (2.8 events per 100 patient-days). Ventricular arrhythmia burden progressively declined during COVID-19 (P < 0.001). The proportion of patients with ventricular arrhythmias amongst the high COVID-19 incidence states was significantly reduced compared with those in low incidence states [odds ratio 0.61, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.54-0.69, P < 0.001]. Comparing patients remotely monitored during both COVID-19 and control periods (n = 2458), significantly fewer ventricular arrhythmias occurred during COVID-19 [incident rate ratio (IRR) 0.68, 95% CI 0.58-0.79, P < 0.001]. This difference persisted when comparing the 1719 patients monitored during both the COVID-19 and seasonal control periods (IRR 0.69, 95% CI 0.56-0.85, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: During COVID-19, there was a 32% reduction in ventricular arrhythmias needing device therapies, coinciding with measures of social isolation. There was a 39% reduction in the proportion of patients with ventricular arrhythmias in states with higher COVID-19 incidence. These findings highlight the potential role of real-life stressors in ventricular arrhythmia burden in individuals with ICDs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry; URL: https://www.anzctr.org.au/; Unique Identifier: ACTRN12620000641998.

Impact of defibrillation threshold testing on burden of heart failure hospitalizations.

Background: Defibrillation threshold testing (DT) following implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation has not shown to improve mortality. However, the impact of DT on burden of heart failure (HF) hospitalisations has not been well defined.Methods: We studied retrospectively consecutive patients who underwent ICD implantation or generator change between 2008 and 2014. Primary outcome was burden of HF hospitalisations within 30 days following implantation. Secondary outcomes were mortality, stroke, and ICD shock within 30 days and one-year mortality.Results: Three hundred and eleven of 501 patients (62%) were in DT+ group versus 190 (38%) were in DT- group. The percentage of new implantations was higher in DT+ group than in DT- group (69% vs 39%, p < .001) but the distributions of NYHA function classes were similar between two groups. The burden of HF hospitalisations at 30-days was significantly higher in DT+ group than in DT- group (17.4% vs 4.7%, HR 0.842, 95% CI 0.774-0.915, p < .0001). No difference in mortality, stroke or ICD shocks was found between two groups at 30 days and mortality at 1 year.Conclusions: DT after new ICD or generator replacement was associated with increased HF hospitalisation rates at 30 days after ICD implant in a non-trial HF population. However, there was no association between DT and mortality, stroke and ICD shocks at 30 days or mortality at 1 year. The increased burden of HF hospitalisation in this observational study requires validation by randomised studies.

Non-invasive assessment of the arrhythmogenic substrate in Brugada syndrome using signal-averaged electrocardiogram: clinical implications from a prospective clinical trial.

AIMS: Brugada syndrome (BrS) represents a major cause of sudden cardiac death in young individuals. The risk stratification to forecast future life-threatening events is still controversial. Non-invasive assessment of late potentials (LPs) has been proposed as a risk stratification tool. However, their nature in BrS is still undetermined. The purpose of this study is to assess the electrophysiological determinants of non-invasive LPs. METHODS AND RESULTS: Two hundred and fifty consecutive patients with (Group 1, n = 96) and without (Group 2, n = 154) BrS-related symptoms were prospectively enrolled in the registry. Signal-averaged electrocardiogram (SAECG) was performed in all subjects before undergoing epicardial mapping. Group 1 patients exhibited larger arrhythmogenic substrates (AS; 5.8 ± 2.8 vs. 2.6 ± 2.1 cm2, P < 0.001) with more delayed potentials (220.4 ± 46.0 vs. 186.7 ± 42.3 ms, P < 0.001). Late potentials were present in 82/96 (85.4%) Group 1 and in 31/154 (20.1%) Group 2 individuals (P < 0.001). Patients exhibiting LPs had more frequently a spontaneous Type 1 pattern (30.1% vs. 10.9%, P < 0.001), SCN5A mutation (34.5% vs. 21.2%, P = 0.02), and exhibited a larger AS with longer potentials (5.8 ± 2.7 vs. 2.2 ± 1.7 cm2; 231.2 ± 37.3 vs. 213.8 ± 39.0 ms; P < 0.001, respectively). Arrhythmogenic substrate dimension was the strongest predictor of the presence of LPs (odds ratio 1.9; P < 0.001). An AS area of at least 3.5 cm2 identified patients with LPs (area under the curve 0.88, 95% confidence interval 0.843-0.931; P < 0.001) with a sensitivity of 86%, specificity 88%, positive predictive value 85%, and negative predictive value 89%. CONCLUSION: The results of this study support the role of the epicardial AS as an electrophysiological determinant of non-invasive LPs, which may serve as a tool in the non-invasive assessment of the BrS substrate, as SAECG-LPs could be considered an expression of the abnormal epicardial electrical activity.ClinicalTrials.gov number (NCT02641431; NCT03106701).

Impact of first documented rhythm on cost-effectiveness of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

OBJECTIVES: Recommendations for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) state that appropriate patient selection is important for the sake of efficacy and cost-effectiveness of ECPR. It is not known whether first documented rhythm plays a prominent role in economic outcomes of patients with cardiac arrest who received ECPR. METHODS AND RESULTS: We reviewed the medical records of 120 consecutive patients who received extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) assisted CPR due to refractory circulatory collapse between 2008 and 2016 in Urasoe General Hospital. The patients presented with ventricular fibrillation or pulseless ventricular tachycardia (VF/VT; n = 59, 49.2%) or with asystole or pulseless electric activity (ASY/PEA; n = 61, 50.8%) as the first documented rhythm. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified shorter duration from collapse to ECMO initiation (odds ratio, 1.95 per 10 min; 95% confidence interval, 1.32-2.89, p = 0.001), bystander CPR (odds ratio, 5.53; 95% confidence interval, 1.36-22.5, p = 0.017), and first documented rhythm of VF/VT (odds ratio, 3.93; 95% confidence interval, 1.30-11.8, p = 0.015) as clinical predictors for neurologically intact survival. Total hospital cost per life saved by ECPR for ASY/PEA was approximately twice that for VF/VT ($213,656 vs. $101,669). ECPR yielded Quality adjusted life years (QALYs) of 3.32 at a mean total cost of $39,634 for VF/VT and QALYs of 1.17 at a mean cost of $35,609 for ASY/PEA. The cost per QALYs was $11,081 for VF/VT and $29,447 for ASY/PEA. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of ECPR vs. conventional CPR was estimated to be $ 16,246 per QALY gained. CONCLUSION: ECPR for patients presenting with VF/VT was found to be highly cost-effective and ECPR for patients presenting with ASY/PEA was borderline cost-effective.

Medical facilities in the neighborhood and incidence of sudden cardiac arrest.

BACKGROUND: Medical establishments in the neighborhood, such as pharmacies and primary care clinics, may play a role in improving access to preventive care and treatment and could explain previously reported neighborhood variations in sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) incidence and survival. METHODS: The Cardiac Arrest Blood Study Repository is a population-based repository of data from adult cardiac arrest patients and population-based controls residing in King County, Washington. We examined the association between the availability of medical facilities near home with SCA risk, using adult (age 18-80) Seattle residents experiencing cardiac arrest (n = 446) and matched controls (n = 208) without a history of heart disease. We also analyzed the association of major medical centers near the event location with emergency medical service (EMS) response time and survival among adult cases (age 18+) presenting with ventricular fibrillation from throughout King County (n = 1537). The number of medical facilities per census tract was determined by geocoding business locations from the National Establishment Time-Series longitudinal database 1990-2010. RESULTS: More pharmacies in the home census tract was unexpectedly associated with higher odds of SCA (OR:1.28, 95% CI: 1.03, 1.59), and similar associations were observed for other medical facility types. The presence of a major medical center in the event census tract was associated with a faster EMS response time (-53 s, 95% CI: -84, -22), but not with short-term survival. CONCLUSIONS: We did not observe a protective association between medical facilities in the home census tract and SCA risk, orbetween major medical centers in the event census tract and survival.

Utility of Fluid Assessment Based on the Intrathoracic Impedance Monitoring in a Peripartum Woman with Heart Disease.

Recently, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) have become capable of monitoring intrathoracic impedance to detect an increased fluid volume and heart failure. Pregnancy is a well-known cause of an increased body fluid volume; however, it is not clear whether the measurement of intrathoracic impedance by ICD is clinically useful for precisely detecting heart failure in pregnant women. We herein report the case of a 39-year-old woman with an ICD that had been implanted after an event of ventricular fibrillation due to severe aortic regurgitation with a bicuspid aortic valve. Elevated right ventricular pressure and brain natriuretic peptide levels were detected at 37 weeks of gestation and postpartum. At the same time, the ICD's stored fluid index gradually increased and exceeded the threshold on the 10th day after delivery. She was treated with diuretics and recovered from postpartum heart failure. The physiological volume changed in the perinatal period, but we were still able to detect heart failure by ICD. Intrathoracic impedance monitoring is effective in the perinatal field.

Outcomes of In-Hospital Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Morbidly Obese Patients.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess the impact of morbid obesity on outcomes in patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA). BACKGROUND: Obesity is associated with increased risk of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest; however, little is known about survival of morbidly obese patients with IHCA. METHODS: Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database from 2001 to 2008, we identified adult patients undergoing resuscitation for IHCA, including those with morbid obesity (body mass index ≥40 kg/m2) by using International Classification of Diseases 9th edition codes and clinical outcomes. Outcomes including in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and discharge dispositions were identified. Logistic regression model was used to examine the independent association of morbid obesity with mortality. RESULTS: Of 1,293,071 IHCA cases, 27,469 cases (2.1%) were morbidly obese. The overall mortality was significantly higher for the morbidly obese group than for the nonobese group experiencing in-hospital non-ventricular fibrillation (non-VF) (77% vs. 73%, respectively; p = 0.006) or VF (65% vs. 58%, respectively; p = 0.01) arrest particularly if cardiac arrest happened late (>7 days) after hospitalization. Discharge to home was significantly lower in the morbidly obese group (21% vs. 31%, respectively; p = 0.04). After we adjusted for baseline variables, morbid obesity remained an independent predictor of increased mortality. Other independent predictors of mortality were age and severe sepsis for non-VF and VF group and venous thromboembolism, cirrhosis, stroke, malignancy, and rheumatologic conditions for non-VF group. CONCLUSIONS: The overall mortality of morbidly obese patients after IHCA is worse than that for nonobese patients, especially if IHCA occurs after 7 days of hospitalization and survivors are more likely to be transferred to a skilled nursing facility.

Benefit of the Wearable Cardioverter-Defibrillator in Protecting Patients After Implantable-Cardioverter Defibrillator Explant: Results From the National Registry.

OBJECTIVES: This study reports on the time course of reimplantation and benefits of the wearable cardioverter-defibrillator (WCD) in patients post implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) explantation. BACKGROUND: The WCD is used to treat patients at high risk for ventricular tachycardia (VT) and ventricular fibrillation (VF), including patients with ICD-related infections who undergo device removal and cannot be immediately reimplanted. METHODS: This retrospective study included consecutive patients from 2002 to 2014 who underwent ICD removal because of device-related infection and were prescribed a WCD. WCD-stored electrocardiograms were reviewed. Event outcome was assessed through either the manufacturer WCD registry or the Social Security death index search. RESULTS: A total of 8,058 patients (mean age 62 ± 14 years, 75% male) were included in the analysis. Median time to reimplantation of an ICD was 50 days (interquartile range: 24 to 83 days). While wearing the WCD, 334 patients (4%) experienced 406 VT/VF events, of which 348 events were treated. Shocks were averted in 54 events by conscious patients. The overall 24-h survival, both treated and nontreated, was 93% (312 of 334). VT/VF occurrence was the highest in the initial weeks after ICD removal (0.9%, 0.7%, and 0.7% per week for weeks 1, 2, and 3, respectively). The 12-month cumulative event rate was 10%. For all patients, the 30-day post-event survival was 81%. An ICD was reimplanted in 80% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of VT/VF reaches 4% during the first 2 months and 10% at 1 year after ICD removal. WCD demonstrated a high efficacy for protecting patients from VT/VF. Clinicians may use the WCD as an ICD alternative when reimplantation is medically delayed.

Differences Between Access to Follow-Up Care and Inappropriate Shocks Based on Insurance Status of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Recipients.

Differences in implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) utilization based on insurance status have been described, but little is known about postimplant follow-up patterns associated with insurance status and outcomes. We collected demographic, clinical, and device data from 119 consecutive patients presenting with ICD shocks. Insurance status was classified as uninsured/Medicaid (uninsured) or private/Health Maintenance Organization /Medicare (insured). Shock frequencies were analyzed before and after a uniform follow-up pattern was implemented regardless of insurance profile. Uninsured patients were more likely to present with an inappropriate shock (63% vs 40%, p = 0.01), and they were more likely to present with atrial fibrillation (AF) as the shock trigger (37% vs 19%, p = 0.04). Uninsured patients had a longer interval between previous physician contact and index ICD shock (147 ± 167 vs 83 ± 124 days, p = 0.04). Patients were followed for a mean of 521 ± 458 days after being enrolled in a uniform follow-up protocol, and there were no differences in the rate of recurrent shocks based on insurance status. In conclusion, among patients presenting with an ICD shock, underinsured/uninsured patients had significantly longer intervals since previous physician contact and were more likely to present with inappropriate shocks and AF, compared to those with private/Medicare coverage. After the index shock, both groups were followed uniformly, and the differences in rates of inappropriate shocks were mitigated. This observation confirms the importance of regular postimplant follow-up as part of the overall ICD management standard.

Ventricular fibrillation with intracoronary adenosine during fractional flow reserve assessment.

Fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurement provides useful hemodynamic assessment of intermediate coronary stenoses affecting long term outcomes. While the gold standard remains intravenous adenosine, intracoronary (IC) bolus administration of adenosine is routinely used in clinical practice because of its ease of use and lower dose providing comparative hyperemia with the most common side effect being a transient atrioventricular block. A 62year old male underwent left heart catheterization after ruling in for non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). Presenting electrocardiogram (ECG) showed an old left bundle branch block and T-wave inversions in lateral leads (QTc 494ms) with no significant electrolyte abnormalities. Coronary angiography revealed an intermediate lesion in mid left anterior descending coronary artery. FFR assessment with IC adenosine (24µg/mL of normal saline) was performed inducing ventricular fibrillation (VF). He was successfully defibrillated with a single 200J shock and no further arrhythmias were noticed during rest of his hospital stay.

Advisory External Defibrillator Availability in General Practice.

This study aimed to describe the availability of advisory external defibrillators (AEDs) in Irish General Practice. The study utilised a computer generated random sample of Irish general practitioners and involved a postal questionnaire, with telephone follow up of non-responders. The cohort of GPs already known to possess an AED (via participation in the Merit Project) was excluded. 115 valid paper survey responses were received representing a response rate of 59%. 5 of the responding GPs identified themselves as Merit project participants and were excluded from data analysis. 74/110 GPs (67%) reported having one or more AED(s) available for use at their practice. 41/77 GPs (53%) who had not responded to the paper survey but were contactable by telephone had an AED available. When AED availability was examined by practice setting a higher proportion of rural and mixed settings had AEDs available than in urban and city areas. Cost was reported as the most common reason for not having an AED.

Impact of Remote Monitoring on Clinical Outcomes.

Follow-up of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices is challenging due to both their increasing volume and technical complexity coupled to increasing clinical complexity of recipient patients. Remote monitoring (RM) offers an opportunity to resolve some of these difficulties by improving clinic efficiencies and providing a mechanism for device monitoring and patient management. Several recent randomized clinical trials and registries have demonstrated that RM may reduce in-hospital visit numbers, time required for patient follow-up, physician and nurse time, and hospital and social costs. Furthermore, patient retention and adherence to follow-up schedule are significantly improved by RM. Continuous wireless monitoring of data stored in the device memory with automatic alerts allows early detection of device malfunctions and of events, such as atrial fibrillation, ventricular arrhythmias, and heart failure suitable for clinical intervention. Early reaction may improve patient outcome. RM is easy to use and patients showed a high level of acceptance and satisfaction. Implementing RM in daily practice may require changes in clinic workflow. New organizational models promote significant efficiencies regarding physician and nursing time. Data management techniques are under development. Despite these demonstrable advantages of RM, adoption still remains modest, even in health care systems incentivized to use this follow-up method.

Sex Differences in Device Therapies for Ventricular Arrhythmias or Death in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (MADIT-CRT) Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Studies suggest that women with ischemic heart disease are less likely to experience appropriate ICD therapies for ventricular arrhythmias (VT/VF). We evaluated the influence of sex on arrhythmic events or death in subjects enrolled in MADIT-CRT. METHODS AND RESULTS: Arrhythmic event rates, defined as VT/VF treated with defibrillator therapy or all-cause death, were determined among 1,790 subjects enrolled in MADIT-CRT with documented 3-year follow-up. Predictors of VT/VF/death were identified using multivariate analysis. Ninety-one (21%) women and 466 (35%) men experienced VT/VF/death over the follow-up period. The overall probability of VT/VF/death was significantly lower in women versus men (HR 0.62; P < 0.001). The probability of VT/VF/death was the lowest in women with ischemic heart disease (HR 0.51; P = 0.003). In ICD subjects, the 3-year risk of VT/VF was lower in ischemic women versus men (P = 0.021), and in nonischemic women versus men (P = 0.049). The probability of VT/VF/death was significantly lower in women (HR 0.52; P = 0.007) and men (HR 0.74; P = 0.018) with LBBB who received CRT-D. Appropriate shock therapy strongly correlated with increased risk of death during postshock follow-up in women (HR 5.18; P = 0.001) and men (HR 1.63; P = 0.033); interaction P value of 0.034. CONCLUSION: In this substudy of MADIT-CRT, sex, etiology of heart disease and type of device implanted significantly influenced subsequent risk for VT/VF or death. Women with ischemic heart disease and women with LBBB who received CRT-D had the lowest incidence of VT/VF or death when compared to men. Appropriate shock therapy was a strong predictor of death, particularly in women.

T-peak to T-end interval for prediction of ventricular tachyarrhythmia and mortality in a primary prevention population with systolic cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: The electrocardiographic T-wave peak to T-wave end interval (Tpe) correlates with dispersion of ventricular repolarization (DVR). Increased DVR increases propensity toward electrical reentry that can cause ventricular tachyarrhythmia. The baseline rate-corrected Tpe (Tpec) has been shown to predict ventricular tachyarrhythmia and death in multiple patient populations but not among cardiomyopathic patients undergoing insertion of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) for primary prevention. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the risk stratification ability of the Tpec in patients with systolic cardiomyopathy without prior ventricular tachyarrhythmia (ie, the primary prevention population). METHODS: We performed prospective follow-up of 305 patients (73% men; left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] 23 ± 7%) with LVEF ≤35% and an ICD implanted for primary prevention. Baseline ECGs were analyzed with automated algorithms. Endpoints were ventricular tachycardia (VT)/ventricular fibrillation (VF), death, and a combined endpoint of VT/VF or death, assessed by device follow-up and Social Security Death Index query. RESULTS: The average Tpec was 107 ± 22 ms. During device clinic follow-up of 31 ± 23 months, 82 patients (27%) had appropriate ICD therapy for VT/VF, and during mortality follow-up of 49 ± 21 months, 91 patients (30%) died. On univariable analysis, Tpec predicted VT/VF, death, and the combined endpoint of VT/VF or death (P < .05 for each endpoint). Multivariable analysis included univariable predictors among demographics, clinical data, laboratory data, medications used, and electrocardiography parameters. After correction, Tpec remained predictive of VT/VF (hazard ratio [HR] per 10-ms increase 1.16, P = .009), all-cause mortality (HR per 10 ms 1.13, P = .05), and the combined endpoint (HR per 10 ms 1.17, P = .001). CONCLUSION: Tpec independently predicts both VT/VF and overall mortality in patients with systolic dysfunction and ICDs implanted for primary prevention.