Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 114
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 18(5): e0012213, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38787898

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Despite several years of LF-MDA implementation, Ghana still has some districts with mf prevalence >1%, partly due to poor treatment coverage levels resulting from non-participation in MDA. To address the challenges, we implemented Engage & Treat (E&T) and Test & Treat (T&T) strategies for individuals who miss or refuse MDA respectively, in a hotspot district, enabling us to reach many of those who seldom, or never, take part in MDA. This financial cost study was undertaken to analyse data on the LF-MDA, E&T and T&T implementation in 2021 and the financial cost to inform the rollout of the E&T and T&T as mop-up strategies in future LF-MDAs. METHODS: This costing study analysed cost data from the 2021 LF-MDA implementation activities carried out by the Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTD) programme of the Ghana Health Service and the SENTINEL study, carried out in Ahanta West district for the two interventions (i.e., E&T and T&T). The 2021 Ghana Population and Housing Census data was used to estimate the LF-MDA-eligible population. The financial cost per person treated was estimated and these costs were applied to the projected population to obtain the financial cost for subsequent years. RESULTS: Implementing MDA mop-up strategies either through the E&T or T&T to improve coverage comes at an additional cost to the elimination goals. For example, in 2024 the projected cost per person treated by the routine LF-MDA is estimated at US$0.83. The cost using the integrated LF-MDA and the E&T, T&T led by the NTD programme or T&T integrated into the health system was estimated at US$1.62, US$2.88, and US$2.33, respectively, for the same year. Despite the increased cost, the proposed combined LF-MDA and mop-up strategies will have a higher estimated population treated for 2024 (i.e., 1,392,211) compared to the routine LF-MDA approach (i.e., 988,470) for the same year. CONCLUSION: Combining LF-MDA with E&T/T&T mop-up strategies, despite their high costs, may provide NTD Programmes with the options of improving treatment coverage and reaching the LF elimination target sooner, given that the routine LF-MDA alone approach has been implemented for many years with some districts yet to reach the elimination targets.


Assuntos
Erradicação de Doenças , Filariose Linfática , Gana/epidemiologia , Humanos , Filariose Linfática/economia , Filariose Linfática/prevenção & controle , Filariose Linfática/epidemiologia , Erradicação de Doenças/economia , Erradicação de Doenças/métodos , Administração Massiva de Medicamentos/economia , Filaricidas/uso terapêutico , Filaricidas/economia , Prevalência
2.
Clin Infect Dis ; 78(Supplement_2): S160-S168, 2024 Apr 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38662697

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The Global Programme to Eliminate Lymphatic Filariasis (GPELF) aims to reduce and maintain infection levels through mass drug administration (MDA), but there is evidence of ongoing transmission after MDA in areas where Culex mosquitoes are the main transmission vector, suggesting that a more stringent criterion is required for MDA decision making in these settings. METHODS: We use a transmission model to investigate how a lower prevalence threshold (<1% antigenemia [Ag] prevalence compared with <2% Ag prevalence) for MDA decision making would affect the probability of local elimination, health outcomes, the number of MDA rounds, including restarts, and program costs associated with MDA and surveys across different scenarios. To determine the cost-effectiveness of switching to a lower threshold, we simulated 65% and 80% MDA coverage of the total population for different willingness to pay per disability-adjusted life-year averted for India ($446.07), Tanzania ($389.83), and Haiti ($219.84). RESULTS: Our results suggest that with a lower Ag threshold, there is a small proportion of simulations where extra rounds are required to reach the target, but this also reduces the need to restart MDA later in the program. For 80% coverage, the lower threshold is cost-effective across all baseline prevalences for India, Tanzania, and Haiti. For 65% MDA coverage, the lower threshold is not cost-effective due to additional MDA rounds, although it increases the probability of local elimination. Valuing the benefits of elimination to align with the GPELF goals, we find that a willingness to pay per capita government expenditure of approximately $1000-$4000 for 1% increase in the probability of local elimination would be required to make a lower threshold cost-effective. CONCLUSIONS: Lower Ag thresholds for stopping MDAs generally mean a higher probability of local elimination, reducing long-term costs and health impacts. However, they may also lead to an increased number of MDA rounds required to reach the lower threshold and, therefore, increased short-term costs. Collectively, our analyses highlight that lower target Ag thresholds have the potential to assist programs in achieving lymphatic filariasis goals.


Assuntos
Análise Custo-Benefício , Filariose Linfática , Administração Massiva de Medicamentos , Filariose Linfática/prevenção & controle , Filariose Linfática/epidemiologia , Filariose Linfática/economia , Humanos , Administração Massiva de Medicamentos/economia , Haiti/epidemiologia , Tanzânia/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Índia/epidemiologia , Animais , Erradicação de Doenças/economia , Erradicação de Doenças/métodos , Filaricidas/uso terapêutico , Filaricidas/administração & dosagem , Filaricidas/economia , Antígenos de Helmintos/sangue , Culex
3.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 18(1): e0011932, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38295107

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The lymphatic filariasis (LF) elimination program in all sixty-three endemic districts of Nepal was based on annual mass drug administration (MDA) using a combination of diethylcarbamazine (DEC) and albendazole for at least 5 years. The MDA program was started in the Parsa district of the Terai region and at least six rounds of MDA were completed between 2003 and 2017 in all filariasis endemic districts of Central Nepal. Transmission Assessment Survey (TAS) report indicated that circulating filarial antigen (CFA) prevalence was below the critical value i.e., ≤ 2% in selected LF endemic districts of Central Nepal. Based on the TAS report, antigen-positive cases were found clustered in the foci of those districts which were considered as "hotspots". Hence the present study was designed to assess microfilaremia in hotspots of four endemic districts of Central Nepal after the MDA program. METHODOLOGY AND PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The present study assessed microfilaremia in hotspots of four endemic districts i.e. Lalitpur and Dhading from the hilly region and Bara and Mahottari from the Terai region of Central Nepal. Night blood samples (n = 1722) were collected by finger prick method from the eligible sample population irrespective of age and sex. Community people's participation in the MDA program was ensured using a structured questionnaire and chronic clinical manifestation of LF was assessed using standard case definition. Two districts one each from the hilly region (Lalitpur district) and Terai region (Bara district) showed improved microfilaria (MF) prevalence i.e. below the critical level (<1%) while the other two districts are still over the critical level. There was a significantly high prevalence of MF in male (p = <0.05) and ≥41 years of age group (p = <0.05) community people in the hotspots of four endemic districts. People who participated in the previous rounds of the MDA program have significantly low MF prevalence. The upper confidence limit of MF prevalence in all hotspots of four districts was above the critical level (>1%). Chronic clinical manifestation of LF showed significant association with the older age group (≥41 years) but not with sex. CONCLUSIONS: The study revealed LF transmission improved in hotspots of two districts while continued in others but the risk of LF resurgence cannot be ignored since the upper confidence level of MF prevalence is over 1% in all the hotspots studied districts. High MF prevalence is well correlated with the number of MDA rounds but not with the MDA coverage. Community people involved in MDA drug uptake in any previous and last rounds have significantly less MF infection. Hence it is recommended that before deciding to stop the MDA rounds it is essential to conduct the MF survey at the hotspots of the sentinel sites.


Assuntos
Filariose Linfática , Filaricidas , Animais , Humanos , Masculino , Idoso , Filariose Linfática/epidemiologia , Filariose Linfática/prevenção & controle , Filariose Linfática/tratamento farmacológico , Administração Massiva de Medicamentos/métodos , Nepal/epidemiologia , Dietilcarbamazina/uso terapêutico , Albendazol/uso terapêutico , Prevalência , Microfilárias , Filaricidas/uso terapêutico , Wuchereria bancrofti
4.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 16(11): e0010900, 2022 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36367853

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: One challenge to achieving Lymphatic filariasis (LF) elimination is the persistent coverage-compliance gap during annual mass drug administration (MDA) and the risk of ongoing transmission among never treated individuals. Our analysis examined factors associated with individuals who were never treated during MDA. METHODS: Data were derived from two cross-sectional surveys conducted in Waihaong and Air Salobar Health Center in 2018 and 2019. We analyzed information from 1915 respondents aged 18 years or above. The study outcome was individuals who self-reported never treatment during any round of MDA. All potential predictors were grouped into socio-demographic, health system, therapy and individual factors. Logistic regression analyses were used to examine factors associated with never treatment in any year of MDA. RESULTS: Nearly half (42%) of respondents self-reported they were never treated during any round of MDA. Factors associated with increased odds of never treatment were respondents working in formal sectors (aOR = 1.75, p = 0.040), living in the catchment area of Waihaong Health Center (aOR = 2.33, p = 0.029), and those perceiving the possibility of adverse events after swallowing LF drugs (aOR = 2.86, p<0.001). Respondents reporting difficulty swallowing all the drugs (aOR = 3.12, p<0.001) and having difficulties remembering the time to swallow the drugs (aOR = 1.53, p = 0.049) also had an increased odds of never treatment. The highest odds of never treatment were associated with respondents reporting almost none of their family members took LF drugs (aOR = 3.93, p<0.001). Respondents confident that they knew how to swallow LF drugs had a reduced odds (aOR = 0.26, p<0.001) of never treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Efforts to reassure community members about adverse events, specific instructions on how to take LF drugs, and improving awareness that MDA participation is part of one's contribution to promoting community health are essential drivers for uptake with LF drugs during MDA.


Assuntos
Filariose Linfática , Filaricidas , Humanos , Filariose Linfática/tratamento farmacológico , Filariose Linfática/epidemiologia , Filariose Linfática/prevenção & controle , Administração Massiva de Medicamentos , Filaricidas/uso terapêutico , Estudos Transversais , Indonésia/epidemiologia
5.
Trop Doct ; 52(4): 556-559, 2022 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35770893

RESUMO

Sustainable Development Goal-3 (SDG) aims to eliminate lymphatic filariasis by 2030 through >65% coverage and compliance of mass drug administration (MDA), the preventive chemotherapy strategy of delivering anthelminthic drugs. However, the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted such programmes, yet MDA was administered during February 2021 in Odisha, India. We aimed to assess the coverage and compliance of the present round of MDA amidst the pandemic and explore factors for non-compliance in Cuttack district of Odisha, a filariasis endemic area. Community-based participants enrolled through multistage stratified sampling were administered a semi-structured questionnaire following COVID-19 protocols. The coverage of MDA was 93.2% whereas consumption was 73.7%. Participants reported that healthcare workers were motivated and satisfactorily explained the benefits of MDA but still fear of side-effects was the major cause of non-compliance. Nonetheless, this recent round of MDA was effective, despite challenges posed by the ongoing pandemic.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Filariose Linfática , Filaricidas , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Erradicação de Doenças/métodos , Filariose Linfática/tratamento farmacológico , Filariose Linfática/epidemiologia , Filariose Linfática/prevenção & controle , Filaricidas/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Índia/epidemiologia , Administração Massiva de Medicamentos , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Desenvolvimento Sustentável
6.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 16(2): e0010231, 2022 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35213537

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Lymphatic filariasis (LF) has been targeted for global elimination as a public health problem since 1997. The primary strategy to interrupt transmission is annual mass drug administration (MDA) for ≥5 years. The transmission assessment survey (TAS) was developed as a decision-making tool to measure LF antigenemia in children to determine when MDA in a region can be stopped. The objective of this study was to investigate potential sampling strategies for follow-up of LF-positive children identified in TAS to detect evidence of ongoing transmission. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPLE FINDINGS: Nippes Department in Haiti passed TAS 1 with 2 positive cases and stopped MDA in 2015; however, 8 positive children were found during TAS 2 in 2017, which prompted a more thorough assessment of ongoing transmission. Purposive sampling was used to select the closest 50 households to each index case household, and systematic random sampling was used to select 20 households from each index case census enumeration area. All consenting household members aged ≥2 years were surveyed and tested for circulating filarial antigen (CFA) using the rapid filarial test strip and for Wb123-specific antibodies using the Filaria Detect IgG4 ELISA. Among 1,927 participants, 1.5% were CFA-positive and 4.5% were seropositive. CFA-positive individuals were identified for 6 of 8 index cases. Positivity ranged from 0.4-2.4%, with highest positivity in the urban commune Miragoane. Purposive sampling found the highest number of CFA-positives (17 vs. 9), and random sampling found a higher percent positive (2.4% vs. 1.4%). CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Overall, both purposive and random sampling methods were reasonable and achievable methods of TAS follow-up in resource-limited settings. Both methods identified additional CFA-positives in close geographic proximity to LF-positive children found by TAS, and both identified strong signs of ongoing transmission in the large urban commune of Miragoane. These findings will help inform standardized guidelines for post-TAS surveillance.


Assuntos
Filariose Linfática , Filaricidas , Animais , Antígenos de Helmintos/uso terapêutico , Criança , Filariose Linfática/tratamento farmacológico , Filariose Linfática/epidemiologia , Filariose Linfática/prevenção & controle , Filaricidas/uso terapêutico , Seguimentos , Haiti/epidemiologia , Humanos , Administração Massiva de Medicamentos/métodos , Prevalência , Wuchereria bancrofti
7.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 106(2): 729-731, 2021 12 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34929673

RESUMO

Between October 2012 and October 2015, we conducted a community trial to assess the impact of semi-annual (twice yearly) community treatment with albendazole on lymphatic filariasis in Seke Pembe, a village in the Republic of the Congo. Semi-annual community treatment with albendazole has been continued in the community since October 2015. We conducted an additional parasitological assessment survey in October 2019, 6 months after the 14th round of semi-annual treatment. Between October 2012 and October 2015, Wuchereria bancrofti antigenemia and microfilaremia rates in the community had decreased from 17.3% to 4.7% and from 5.3% to 0.3%, respectively. In October 2019, the antigenemia rate had decreased further to 2.8% (19 of 687). No microfilariae were found in night blood smears from persons with circulating filarial antigenemia (0 of 16), suggesting that W. bancrofti transmission has been interrupted in Seke Pembe. Semi-annual albendazole treatments also reduced significantly infection rates with soil-transmitted helminths.


Assuntos
Albendazol/uso terapêutico , Filariose Linfática/tratamento farmacológico , Filariose Linfática/transmissão , Filaricidas/uso terapêutico , Helmintíase/tratamento farmacológico , Administração Massiva de Medicamentos/normas , Saúde Pública/métodos , Solo/parasitologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Antígenos de Helmintos/sangue , Criança , Congo/epidemiologia , Feminino , Helmintíase/classificação , Helmintíase/epidemiologia , Helmintíase/parasitologia , Humanos , Masculino , Administração Massiva de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Saúde Pública/normas , Saúde Pública/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto Jovem
8.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 15(3): e0009002, 2021 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33657090

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Many countries will not reach elimination targets for lymphatic filariasis in 2020 using the two-drug treatment regimen (diethylcarbamazine citrate [DEC] and albendazole [DA]). A cluster-randomized, community-based safety study performed in Fiji, Haiti, India, Indonesia and Papua New Guinea tested the safety and efficacy of a new regimen of ivermectin, DEC and albendazole (IDA). METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: To assess acceptability of IDA and DA, a mixed methods study was embedded within this community-based safety study. The study objective was to assess the acceptability of IDA versus DA. Community surveys were performed in each country with randomly selected participants (>14 years) from the safety study participant list in both DA and IDA arms. In depth interviews (IDI) and focus group discussions (FGD) assessed acceptability-related themes. In 1919 individuals, distribution of sex, microfilariae (Mf) presence and circulating filarial antigenemia (CFA), adverse events (AE) and age were similar across arms. A composite acceptability score summed the values from nine indicators (range 9-36). The median (22.5) score indicated threshold of acceptability. There was no difference in scores for IDA and DA regimens. Mean acceptability scores across both treatment arms were: Fiji 33.7 (95% CI: 33.1-34.3); Papua New Guinea 32.9 (95% CI: 31.9-33.8); Indonesia 30.6 (95% CI: 29.8-31.3); Haiti 28.6 (95% CI: 27.8-29.4); India 26.8 (95% CI: 25.6-28) (P<0.001). AE, Mf or CFA were not associated with acceptability. Qualitative research (27 FGD; 42 IDI) highlighted professionalism and appreciation for AE support. No major concerns were detected about number of tablets. Increased uptake of LF treatment by individuals who had never complied with MDA was observed. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: IDA and DA regimens for LF elimination were highly and equally acceptable in individuals participating in the community-based safety study in Fiji, Haiti, India, Indonesia, and Papua New Guinea. Country variation in acceptability was significant. Acceptability of the professionalism of the treatment delivery was highlighted.


Assuntos
Filariose Linfática/tratamento farmacológico , Filaricidas/uso terapêutico , Administração Massiva de Medicamentos/métodos , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Adolescente , Adulto , Albendazol/administração & dosagem , Albendazol/uso terapêutico , Dietilcarbamazina/administração & dosagem , Dietilcarbamazina/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Filaricidas/administração & dosagem , Grupos Focais , Humanos , Ivermectina/administração & dosagem , Ivermectina/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Profissionalismo , Inquéritos e Questionários
9.
Parasit Vectors ; 14(1): 72, 2021 Jan 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33482891

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Myanmar commenced a lymphatic filariasis (LF) elimination programme in 2000. Whilst the country has made considerable progress since then, a number of districts have demonstrated persistent transmission after many rounds of mass drug administration (MDA). The causes of unsuccessful MDA have been examined elsewhere; however, there remains little information on the factors that contribute in Myanmar. METHODS: We conducted an analysis of factors associated with persistent infection, LF-related hydrocoele and MDA participation in an area with ongoing transmission in 2015. A cross-sectional household survey was undertaken in 24 villages across four townships of Mandalay Region. Participants were screened for circulating filarial antigen (CFA) using immunochromatographic tests and, if positive, for microfilaria by night-time thick blood slide. Individuals 15 year and older were assessed for filariasis morbidity (lymphoedema and, if male, hydrocoele) by ultrasound-assisted clinical examination. A pre-coded questionnaire was used to assess risk factors for LF and for non-participation (never taking MDA). Significant variables identified in univariate analyses were included in separate step-wise multivariate logistic regressions for each outcome. RESULTS: After adjustment for covariates and survey design, being CFA positive was significantly associated with age [odds ratio (OR) 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.06), per year], male gender (OR 3.14, 1.27-7.76), elevation (OR 0.96, 0.94-0.99, per metre) and the density of people per household room (OR 1.59, 1.31-1.92). LF-related hydrocoele was associated with age (OR 1.06, 1.03-1.09, per year) and residing in Amarapura Township (OR 8.93, 1.37-58.32). Never taking MDA was associated with male gender [OR 6.89 (2.13-22.28)] and age, particularly in females, with a significant interaction term. Overall, compared to those aged 30-44 years, the proportion never taking MDA was higher in all age groups (OR highest in those < 5 years and > 60 years, ranging from 3.37 to 12.82). Never taking MDA was also associated with residing in Amarapura township (OR 2.48, 1.15-5.31), moving to one's current village from another (OR 2.62, 1.12-6.11) and ever having declined medication (OR 11.82, 4.25-32.91). Decreased likelihood of never taking MDA was associated with a higher proportion of household members being present during the last MDA round (OR 0.16, 0.03-0.74) and the number visits by the MDA programme (OR 0.69, 0.48-1.00). CONCLUSIONS: These results contribute to the understanding of LF and MDA participation-related risk factors and will assist Myanmar to improve its elimination and morbidity management programmes.


Assuntos
Participação da Comunidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Filariose Linfática/tratamento farmacológico , Filaricidas/uso terapêutico , Administração Massiva de Medicamentos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos Transversais , Erradicação de Doenças/métodos , Erradicação de Doenças/normas , Erradicação de Doenças/estatística & dados numéricos , Filariose Linfática/epidemiologia , Características da Família , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mianmar/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto Jovem
10.
Int Health ; 13(Suppl 1): S65-S70, 2020 12 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33349883

RESUMO

The Global Programme to Eliminate Lymphatic Filariasis (GPELF) was established with the ambitious goal of eliminating LF as a public health problem. The remarkable success of the GPELF over the past 2 decades in carrying out its principal strategy of scaling up and scaling down mass drug administration has relied first on the development of a rigorous monitoring and evaluation (M&E) framework and then the willingness of the World Health Organization and its community of partners to modify this framework in response to the practical experiences of national programmes. This flexibility was facilitated by the strong partnership that developed among researchers, LF programme managers and donors willing to support the necessary research agenda. This brief review summarizes the historical evolution of the GPELF M&E strategies and highlights current research needed to achieve the elimination goal.


Assuntos
Filariose Linfática , Filaricidas , Filariose Linfática/tratamento farmacológico , Filariose Linfática/epidemiologia , Filariose Linfática/prevenção & controle , Filaricidas/uso terapêutico , Saúde Global , Humanos , Administração Massiva de Medicamentos , Organização Mundial da Saúde
11.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 102(6): 1404-1410, 2020 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32228796

RESUMO

Following the halt of mass drug administration (MDA) for lymphatic filariasis (LF), the WHO recommends at least 4 years of post-treatment surveillance (PTS) to confirm that transmission recrudescence or importation does not occur. The primary means of evaluation during PTS is repeated transmission assessment surveys (TASs) conducted at 2- to 3-year intervals after TAS-1 stop-MDA surveys. This study reports the results of TAS-2 and TAS-3 surveys in Plateau and Nasarawa states (pop. 6.9 million) of Nigeria divided into a minimum of seven evaluation units (EUs) per TAS. A total of 26,536 first- and second-year primary school children (approximately 6-7 years old) were tested for circulating filarial antigen (CFA) between 2014 and 2017. Of 12,313 children tested in TAS-2 surveys, only five (0.04%) were CFA positive, with no more than two positive samples from any one EU, which was below the critical value of 20 per EU. Of 14,240 children tested in TAS-3 surveys, none (0%) were CFA positive. These results indicate that LF transmission remains below sustainable transmission levels and suggest that elimination of transmission has been achieved in Plateau and Nasarawa, Nigeria.


Assuntos
Albendazol/uso terapêutico , Filariose Linfática/epidemiologia , Filariose Linfática/prevenção & controle , Ivermectina/uso terapêutico , Administração Massiva de Medicamentos , Vigilância da População , Albendazol/administração & dosagem , Anti-Helmínticos/administração & dosagem , Anti-Helmínticos/uso terapêutico , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Filaricidas/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Ivermectina/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Nigéria/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos
13.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 13(11): e0007836, 2019 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31765388

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The objective of the Global Program to Eliminate Lymphatic Filariasis (GPELF) is to phase out this endemic disease as a public health problem by 2020. Validation of elimination is obtained from the World Health Organization through evidence of non-transmission in countries that have already been subjected to mass drug administration (MDA) and in places adjoining these endemic areas. While three municipalities in Brazil have completed MDA, the epidemiological situation remains uncertain in nine adjoining municipalities. To determine the epidemiological status, this study was to perform a review of the literature and a school-based survey to describe the past and recent endemicity of lymphatic filariasis (LF) theses nine municipalities in Brazil. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPLE FINDINGS: For review of the literature, both formal and informal literature sources were accessed since the first reports of filariasis in the Metropolitan Region of Recife, Brazil. We conducted a school-based survey in 2016 using immunochromatographic card tests (ICTs) among schoolchildren aged 6-10 years living in nine municipalities contiguous with the endemic areas in which MDA was conducted. Our review of the literature identified eight studies involving surveys demonstrating that microfilariae had been circulating in eight of the municipalities since 1967, with a low prevalence of microfilaremia, isolated autochthonous cases, and treatment of individual cases. The school-based survey included 17,222 children in 185 urban schools in the nine areas of Brazil with uncertain endemicity. One child affected by allochthonous transmission was antigen positive based on ICT and lived in a municipality adjacent to Recife; this child's family came from Recife, but no other case was diagnosed within the family. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The study results suggest that there is no transmission of LF in the municipalities investigated. However, these areas have population migration and socioenvironmental conditions favorable to mosquito breeding grounds; therefore, surveillance is strongly recommended in these areas.


Assuntos
Transmissão de Doença Infecciosa/prevenção & controle , Filariose Linfática/epidemiologia , Filariose Linfática/transmissão , Adolescente , Brasil/epidemiologia , Criança , Erradicação de Doenças , Filariose Linfática/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Filaricidas/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Masculino , Administração Massiva de Medicamentos , Prevalência
14.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 13(9): e0007697, 2019 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31557154

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Lymphatic filariasis (LF) is a neglected tropical disease, and the Global Program to Eliminate LF delivers mass drug administration (MDA) to 500 million people every year. Adverse events (AEs) are common after LF treatment. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: To better understand the pathogenesis of AEs, we studied LF-patients from a treatment trial. Plasma levels of many filarial antigens increased post-treatment in individuals with AEs, and this is consistent with parasite death. Circulating immune complexes were not elevated in these participants, and the classical complement cascade was not activated. Multiple cytokines increased after treatment in persons with AEs. A transcriptomic analysis was performed for nine individuals with moderate systemic AEs and nine matched controls. Differential gene expression analysis identified a significant transcriptional signature associated with post-treatment AEs; 744 genes were upregulated. The transcriptional signature was enriched for TLR and NF-κB signaling. Increased expression of seven out of the top eight genes upregulated in persons with AEs were validated by qRT-PCR, including TLR2. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: This is the first global study of changes in gene expression associated with AEs after treatment of lymphatic filariasis. Changes in cytokines were consistent with prior studies and with the RNAseq data. These results suggest that Wolbachia lipoprotein is involved in AE development, because it activates TLR2-TLR6 and downstream NF-κB. Additionally, LPS Binding Protein (LBP, which shuttles lipoproteins to TLR2) increased post-treatment in individuals with AEs. Improved understanding of the pathogenesis of AEs may lead to improved management, increased MDA compliance, and accelerated LF elimination.


Assuntos
Filariose Linfática/tratamento farmacológico , Filaricidas/uso terapêutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Albendazol/administração & dosagem , Albendazol/efeitos adversos , Antígenos de Helmintos/sangue , Citocinas/sangue , Citocinas/imunologia , Dietilcarbamazina/efeitos adversos , Dietilcarbamazina/uso terapêutico , Filariose Linfática/genética , Filariose Linfática/imunologia , Feminino , Filaricidas/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Ivermectina/administração & dosagem , Ivermectina/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem
15.
Parasit Vectors ; 12(1): 276, 2019 May 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31146779

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Lymphatic filariasis (LF) is still a public health burden in many developing countries. In Benin, a West African country, at least 6.6 million people are at risk for LF. With the goal of eliminating LF by 2020, mass drug administration (MDA) has been scaled-up during the last decade. Currently, 23 districts are believed to have eliminated LF as a public health problem, and 25 other districts are still under treatment. In this study we report the results of the first transmission assessment survey of LF (TAS1) in 13 districts from the second group, which have received at least six rounds of MDA with albendazole and ivermectin. METHODS: The 13 districts were grouped into six evaluation units (EU). In each EU, 30 schools randomly selected by survey sample builder (SSB) software were surveyed. Children aged six and seven were sampled in schools and for each child the Alere™ Filariasis Test Strip test was carried out using finger-prick blood to detect the circulating filarial antigen from Wuchereria bancrofti. RESULTS: Overall, 9381 children were sampled in 191 schools from the six EU with 47.6% of the children aged six years and 52.4% aged seven years. Five EU passed the assessment, with no positive cases identified. The EU of Ouinhi which grouped the districts of Ouinhi, Cove, Za-Kpota and Zagnanado failed, with 47 positive cases. These cases were clustered in the districts of Ouinhi (n = 20), Za-Kpota (n = 11) and Zagnanado (n = 16). No cases were found in the district of Cove. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of our study indicate that Benin has made important progress towards elimination in most districts evaluated. However, this study also shows that transmission of LF is ongoing in the EU of Ouinhi, part of the Zou department. The MDA strategy needs to be strengthened in order to control the human reservoir of infection in these districts.


Assuntos
Filariose Linfática/tratamento farmacológico , Filariose Linfática/transmissão , Filaricidas/uso terapêutico , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Wuchereria bancrofti/efeitos dos fármacos , Albendazol/uso terapêutico , Animais , Antígenos de Helmintos/sangue , Benin/epidemiologia , Criança , Erradicação de Doenças , Feminino , Humanos , Ivermectina/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Administração Massiva de Medicamentos , Saúde Pública , Inquéritos e Questionários , Resultado do Tratamento
16.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 101(1): 271-278, 2019 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31115301

RESUMO

The transmission assessment survey (TAS) is recommended to determine whether cessation of mass drug administration (MDA) for lymphatic filariasis (LF) is warranted. Ministries of health typically implement TASs in evaluation units (EUs) that have had more than five rounds of annual MDA. Under TAS guidelines, sample size calculations determine a decision value: if the number of individuals testing positive exceeds this threshold, then MDA continues in the EU. The objective of this study was to determine whether fine scale geospatial covariates could be used to identify predictors of TAS failure. We geo-referenced 746 TAS EUs, of which 65 failed and extracted geospatial covariates using R to estimate odds of failure. We implemented stepwise backward elimination to select covariates for inclusion in a logistic regression to estimate the odds of TAS failure. Covariates included environmental predictors (aridity, distance to fresh water, elevation, and enhanced vegetation index), cumulative rounds of MDA, measures of urbanicity and access, LF species, and baseline prevalence. Presence of Brugia was significantly associated with TAS failure (odds ratio [OR]: 4.79, 95% CI: 2.52-9.07), as was population density (OR: 2.91, 95% CI: 1.06-7.98). The presence of nighttime lights was highly protective against failure (OR: 0.22, 95% CI: 0.10-0.50), as was an increase in elevation (OR: 0.36, 95% CI: 0.18-0.732). This work identifies predictors associated with TAS failure at the EU areal level, given the data presently available, and also identifies the need for more granular data to conduct a more robust assessment of these predictors.


Assuntos
Transmissão de Doença Infecciosa/prevenção & controle , Filariose Linfática/prevenção & controle , Filariose Linfática/transmissão , Monitoramento Epidemiológico , Coleta de Dados , Ecossistema , Filariose Linfática/tratamento farmacológico , Filaricidas/administração & dosagem , Filaricidas/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Administração Massiva de Medicamentos/economia , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Organização Mundial da Saúde
17.
Parasit Vectors ; 12(1): 246, 2019 May 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31109348

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The global burden of onchocerciasis is the heaviest in sub-Saharan Africa. Studies have shown the importance of the role of Community-Directed Distributors (CDDs) and nurses in onchocerciasis control, but little is known about their experience in implementing onchocerciasis control programmes. Our aim was to document the barriers that CDDs and local health administrators face in implementing onchocerciasis control activities. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative survey consisting of 16 in-depth interviews and 8 focus group discussions (FGDs) across three health districts of Cameroon. We interviewed a total of 9 local health officials at the district and Health Area levels, and 7 CDDs. Eight FGDs were conducted with CDDs and Health Committee members. RESULTS: The major barriers to the implementation of Community Directed Treatment with Ivermectin that we identified were linked and interrelated. Examples of these barriers included: contextual factors (geographical and cultural background), top-to-bottom planning, insufficient human and material resources, and lack of transparency in the management of the programme's funds. CONCLUSIONS: The CDTI at operational level still faces many obstacles which negatively affect therapeutic coverages. This can lead to the non-adhesion of the communities to the programme, consequently jeopardizing the sustainability of the onchocerciasis elimination programme. We recommend that the national programme planners put in place a transparent management and planning system for onchocerciasis elimination activities, with better communication with local programme stakeholders.


Assuntos
Implementação de Plano de Saúde/organização & administração , Controle de Infecções/organização & administração , Oncocercose/prevenção & controle , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Participação dos Interessados , África Subsaariana/epidemiologia , Animais , Antiparasitários/uso terapêutico , Camarões/epidemiologia , Serviços de Saúde Comunitária , Agentes Comunitários de Saúde , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Estudos de Avaliação como Assunto , Feminino , Filaricidas/uso terapêutico , Grupos Focais , Implementação de Plano de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Controle de Infecções/estatística & dados numéricos , Ivermectina/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Oncocercose/tratamento farmacológico , Inquéritos e Questionários
18.
Health Educ Res ; 34(3): 300-309, 2019 06 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30805648

RESUMO

Lymphatic filariasis (LF), a neglected tropical disease is targeted for elimination globally by 2020. National Health Policy of India set the goal by 2017 and annual single-dose mass drug administration (MDA) with anti-filarial drugs is in operation in endemic districts since 2004. Performance and effectiveness of MDA was diverse across the nation and prevalence of infection continues above threshold level in 50% of endemic districts which requires alternative strategies. National programme aims at achieving >65% consumption for transmission control. Post 10 rounds of MDA in an endemic district of Kerala state, a three-arm study identified determinants in gap in outreach and consumption, based on which context-dependent intervention using social group work and networking (SGWN) was implemented and impact assessed. A spill over effect with overall increase in coverage and consumption rates irrespective of arms apparently is due to inclusive improvement in MDA programme whereas, significant relative improvement in intervention arm reflects effectiveness of SGWN strategy. Though reduction in microfilaria prevalence in all arms was observed, it was significant between intervention and comparison arm. This study highlights need for context-dependent communication strategy to improve MDA for accelerating LF elimination by the targeted 2020.


Assuntos
Filariose Linfática/tratamento farmacológico , Filariose Linfática/epidemiologia , Filaricidas/uso terapêutico , Administração Massiva de Medicamentos/métodos , Esquema de Medicação , Doenças Endêmicas , Filaricidas/administração & dosagem , Política de Saúde , Humanos , Índia/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Rede Social
19.
Parasit Vectors ; 11(1): 356, 2018 Jun 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29921312

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: After more than 15 years of community-directed treatment with ivermectin (CDTI) in the Centre 1, Littoral 2 and West CDTI projects in Cameroon, the epidemiological evaluation conducted in 2011 revealed that onchocerciasis endemicity was still high in some communities. To investigate the potential reasons explaining this high endemicity, a cluster coverage survey was conducted in April-May 2015 in three health districts (HD), to assess the implementation of the CDTI, the 2014 therapeutic coverage and the five-year adherence to treatment. A two-stage cluster design was considered during analyses, with data weighted proportionally to age and gender distribution in the population. RESULTS: In the three HDs, 69 community leaders, 762 heads of households, 83 community drug distributors (CDD) and 2942 household members were interviewed. The CDTI organization and the involvement of heads of households were in average weak, with 84.0% (95% CI: 81.2-86.4%) of them who had not participated in activities during the 2014 mass drug administration (MDA). On average, six of ten community leaders declared that the period of treatment was decided by the health personnel while the CDDs selection was made during a community meeting for only 43.4% of them. The 2014 weighted therapeutic coverage was 64.1% (95% CI: 56.8-70.9%), with no significant difference in the three HDs. The survey coverages were lower than the reported coverages with a significant difference varying from 14.1% to 22.0%. Among those aged 10 years and above, 57.8% (95% CI: 50.2-65.1%) declared having taken the treatment each time during the last five MDAs with no significant difference among HDs, while 9.8% (95% CI: 7.5-12.8%) declared that they had never taken the drug. In multivariate analysis, the most important factors associated with the five-year adherence to treatment were high involvement in CDTI and age (40+ years). CONCLUSIONS: Despite more than 15 years of CDTI, there was still weak community participation and ownership, a lower coverage than reported and an average five-year adherence in the surveyed HDs. The reinforcement of the community ownership by the Ministry of Public Health officials and the timely procurement of ivermectin as requested by the communities are some measures that should be implemented to improve the therapeutic coverage, adherence to treatment and hence achieve onchocerciasis elimination. Further anthropological and entomological studies would provide better insights into our understanding of the persistence of the disease in these three CDTI projects.


Assuntos
Filaricidas/uso terapêutico , Ivermectina/uso terapêutico , Adesão à Medicação , Oncocercose/tratamento farmacológico , Oncocercose/psicologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Camarões , Criança , Serviços de Saúde Comunitária/estatística & dados numéricos , Agentes Comunitários de Saúde , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Filaricidas/economia , Humanos , Ivermectina/economia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Oncocercose/economia , Adulto Jovem
20.
J Vector Borne Dis ; 55(1): 20-25, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29916444

RESUMO

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: India is a signatory to the 1997 World Health Assembly resolutions on lymphatic fila- riasis, and other neglected tropical diseases, and supports global elimination of lymphatic filariasis by 2020. The global programme to eliminate lymphatic filariasis (GPELF) has two main components, viz. interrupting transmission of LF through mass drug administration; and managing morbidity and preventing disability. Consorted efforts by the Public Health Department in Tamil Nadu state (India) for elimination of LF was launched in the year 1997 concentrating on both the components of the programme. The data on the prevalence of filarial morbidity and its entire management at present is based on manual reports and registers maintained by the field functionaries. To overcome the constraints in the manual reporting, an attempt was made to develop a web-based reporting system with different modules and user-friendly interface. METHODS: The Vellore and Thiruvannamalai districts were selected as a study area. The study was conducted between 2011 and 2014, which revealed that the entire morbidity management was based on the manual formats. Constraints in the present manual reporting were analysed. PHP and MySQL tools were used to generate user friendly modules. Feedback was collected from field functionaries at different health centre levels, on the adequacy in the modules and effectiveness of the web-based reporting system. RESULTS: The online reporting modules facilitated data entry at the health subcentre level itself. Analysis and retrieval of data was facilitated at all other levels in the public health system. The modules also covered details of surgical interventions, ex-gratia payments and other benefits extended to the lymphoedema patients by the Government. INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSION: The usage and feedback of the web-based reporting system appeared very encouraging and reliable, indicating that it can be implemented in health programmes for disease management. This web-based user-friendly online reporting system can contribute largely to achieve the goals of the GPELF; specially after MDA is withdrawn.


Assuntos
Erradicação de Doenças/métodos , Filariose Linfática/epidemiologia , Filariose Linfática/prevenção & controle , Tecnologia da Informação/estatística & dados numéricos , Wuchereria bancrofti/efeitos dos fármacos , Animais , Gerenciamento Clínico , Filariose Linfática/tratamento farmacológico , Filariose Linfática/parasitologia , Filaricidas/uso terapêutico , Saúde Global , Humanos , Índia/epidemiologia , Morbidade , Prevalência , Software , Wuchereria bancrofti/isolamento & purificação
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA