Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 125
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 18(5): e0012213, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38787898

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Despite several years of LF-MDA implementation, Ghana still has some districts with mf prevalence >1%, partly due to poor treatment coverage levels resulting from non-participation in MDA. To address the challenges, we implemented Engage & Treat (E&T) and Test & Treat (T&T) strategies for individuals who miss or refuse MDA respectively, in a hotspot district, enabling us to reach many of those who seldom, or never, take part in MDA. This financial cost study was undertaken to analyse data on the LF-MDA, E&T and T&T implementation in 2021 and the financial cost to inform the rollout of the E&T and T&T as mop-up strategies in future LF-MDAs. METHODS: This costing study analysed cost data from the 2021 LF-MDA implementation activities carried out by the Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTD) programme of the Ghana Health Service and the SENTINEL study, carried out in Ahanta West district for the two interventions (i.e., E&T and T&T). The 2021 Ghana Population and Housing Census data was used to estimate the LF-MDA-eligible population. The financial cost per person treated was estimated and these costs were applied to the projected population to obtain the financial cost for subsequent years. RESULTS: Implementing MDA mop-up strategies either through the E&T or T&T to improve coverage comes at an additional cost to the elimination goals. For example, in 2024 the projected cost per person treated by the routine LF-MDA is estimated at US$0.83. The cost using the integrated LF-MDA and the E&T, T&T led by the NTD programme or T&T integrated into the health system was estimated at US$1.62, US$2.88, and US$2.33, respectively, for the same year. Despite the increased cost, the proposed combined LF-MDA and mop-up strategies will have a higher estimated population treated for 2024 (i.e., 1,392,211) compared to the routine LF-MDA approach (i.e., 988,470) for the same year. CONCLUSION: Combining LF-MDA with E&T/T&T mop-up strategies, despite their high costs, may provide NTD Programmes with the options of improving treatment coverage and reaching the LF elimination target sooner, given that the routine LF-MDA alone approach has been implemented for many years with some districts yet to reach the elimination targets.


Assuntos
Erradicação de Doenças , Filariose Linfática , Gana/epidemiologia , Humanos , Filariose Linfática/economia , Filariose Linfática/prevenção & controle , Filariose Linfática/epidemiologia , Erradicação de Doenças/economia , Erradicação de Doenças/métodos , Administração Massiva de Medicamentos/economia , Filaricidas/uso terapêutico , Filaricidas/economia , Prevalência
2.
J Vector Borne Dis ; 61(1): 136-142, 2024 Jan 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38648416

RESUMO

BACKGROUND OBJECTIVES: Annual mass drug administration (MDA) is the main strategy to interrupt the transmission of lymphatic filariasis (LF) in the community. The main aim of monitoring the MDA program, for its effectiveness and interruption of LF is the post-MDA surveillance using antigen survey in children born after MDA. The latest technique of new research suggests that xenomonitoring is an effective tool for monitoring LF intervention. The objective of this study was to assess the W. bancrofti infection/or infectivity in vector mosquitoes by xenomonitoring during post-MDA surveillance. METHODS: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in the hotspots of selected four districts of Central Nepal. A gravid trap technique was used for sampling mosquitoes. Infection/or infectivity was determined via the dissection of vector mosquitoes. Anopheles, Aedes, Armigerus and Culex species were collected from hotspots of four endemic districts, two from the hilly region (Lalitpur and Dhading) and two from Terai region (Bara and Mahottari) of Central Nepal. RESULTS: A total of 4450 mosquitoes belonging to four genera, Anopheles, Culex, Armigeres, and Aedes were collected from four hotspots. The distribution of Culex quinquefasciatus was found to be the highest, 88.9% (n=3955/4450) followed by Cx. vishnui (4.5%), Armigeres sp (5.8%), An. culicifascies (0.2%), Aedes spp (0.8%). The proportion of female mosquitoes trapped is significantly higher. A total of 3344 parous Cx. quinquefasciatus mosquitoes were dissected for any larval stage of W. bancrofti. We could not find any filarial infection in dissected mosquito samples. INTERPRETATION CONCLUSION: We conclude that the gravid trap is an efficient tool for the collection of gravid Cx. quinquefasciatus mosquitoes for xenomonitoring studies of filariasis endemic regions. Vector composition indicated a maximum number of vector mosquitoes of lymphatic filariasis were trapped compared with the other three species. Distribution and density of Cx. quinquefasciatus was found highest in four hotspots of endemic districts. None of the Cx. quinquefasciatus dissected were found to be infected by larval forms of filaria. Since the low levels of infection persistence in the human population in these hot spots, vector infection and infectivity can't be ignored. Microscopic xenomonitoring at a low level of infection persistent is less likely to be efficient so molecular xenomonitoring along with a large sample should be required in each of the hot spots of the districts. Additionally, area is receptive so further vector control intervention should be required to reduce the risk of resurgence of infection.


Assuntos
Aedes , Culex , Filariose Linfática , Administração Massiva de Medicamentos , Mosquitos Vetores , Wuchereria bancrofti , Filariose Linfática/epidemiologia , Filariose Linfática/transmissão , Filariose Linfática/prevenção & controle , Animais , Nepal/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Mosquitos Vetores/parasitologia , Mosquitos Vetores/fisiologia , Humanos , Wuchereria bancrofti/isolamento & purificação , Culex/parasitologia , Culex/fisiologia , Aedes/fisiologia , Aedes/parasitologia , Feminino , Anopheles/parasitologia , Anopheles/fisiologia , Monitoramento Epidemiológico , Masculino , Doenças Endêmicas
3.
Clin Infect Dis ; 78(Supplement_2): S160-S168, 2024 Apr 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38662697

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The Global Programme to Eliminate Lymphatic Filariasis (GPELF) aims to reduce and maintain infection levels through mass drug administration (MDA), but there is evidence of ongoing transmission after MDA in areas where Culex mosquitoes are the main transmission vector, suggesting that a more stringent criterion is required for MDA decision making in these settings. METHODS: We use a transmission model to investigate how a lower prevalence threshold (<1% antigenemia [Ag] prevalence compared with <2% Ag prevalence) for MDA decision making would affect the probability of local elimination, health outcomes, the number of MDA rounds, including restarts, and program costs associated with MDA and surveys across different scenarios. To determine the cost-effectiveness of switching to a lower threshold, we simulated 65% and 80% MDA coverage of the total population for different willingness to pay per disability-adjusted life-year averted for India ($446.07), Tanzania ($389.83), and Haiti ($219.84). RESULTS: Our results suggest that with a lower Ag threshold, there is a small proportion of simulations where extra rounds are required to reach the target, but this also reduces the need to restart MDA later in the program. For 80% coverage, the lower threshold is cost-effective across all baseline prevalences for India, Tanzania, and Haiti. For 65% MDA coverage, the lower threshold is not cost-effective due to additional MDA rounds, although it increases the probability of local elimination. Valuing the benefits of elimination to align with the GPELF goals, we find that a willingness to pay per capita government expenditure of approximately $1000-$4000 for 1% increase in the probability of local elimination would be required to make a lower threshold cost-effective. CONCLUSIONS: Lower Ag thresholds for stopping MDAs generally mean a higher probability of local elimination, reducing long-term costs and health impacts. However, they may also lead to an increased number of MDA rounds required to reach the lower threshold and, therefore, increased short-term costs. Collectively, our analyses highlight that lower target Ag thresholds have the potential to assist programs in achieving lymphatic filariasis goals.


Assuntos
Análise Custo-Benefício , Filariose Linfática , Administração Massiva de Medicamentos , Filariose Linfática/prevenção & controle , Filariose Linfática/epidemiologia , Filariose Linfática/economia , Humanos , Administração Massiva de Medicamentos/economia , Haiti/epidemiologia , Tanzânia/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Índia/epidemiologia , Animais , Erradicação de Doenças/economia , Erradicação de Doenças/métodos , Filaricidas/uso terapêutico , Filaricidas/administração & dosagem , Filaricidas/economia , Antígenos de Helmintos/sangue , Culex
4.
Int Health ; 16(Supplement_1): i22-i29, 2024 Mar 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38547349

RESUMO

Lymphatic filariasis (LF) is a neglected tropical disease affecting >120 million people worldwide. LF has debilitating effects on humans and leads to morbidity and sometimes irreversible disability. A significant proportion of persons affected by LF morbidity also suffer from ill health, such as depression, anxiety, pain, stigma and social isolation due to disfigurement, as well as loss of mobility, livelihood and income. Mental health is often overlooked as a component of morbidity management and disability prevention (MMDP) services, despite the high prevalence of depression and anxiety among people affected by LF. To address this gap, Christian Blind Mission (CBM) piloted a comprehensive approach providing morbidity management and disability prevention by integrating mental health as part of the MMDP care package. The participatory evaluation of the project reviewed the project documents and a review meeting, small group discussions and in-depth interviews with project stakeholders. Findings suggest that project training and service delivery targets were exceeded in most cases. In addition, the disability and gender disaggregated data highlights the interplay of gender and disability in accessing care and the existence of unmet mental health needs. The financial cost of transportation to utilise referrals or access other MMDP services, such as replenishing treatment supplies, was a major constraint in accessing services for LF morbidity patients and low levels of awareness, fear of hydrocoele surgery and social stigmatisation were reported. The project outcomes demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of integrating mental health as part of a comprehensive MMDP package of care. Integration strategies should target training of MMDP providers in basic mental health skills, screening for mental health issues and the provision of mental health services and other MMDP services within the same facilities. Integration is an important step towards comprehensive care for people affected by LF and other NTD morbidities and disabilities.


Assuntos
Filariose Linfática , Humanos , Filariose Linfática/epidemiologia , Filariose Linfática/prevenção & controle , Saúde Mental , Nigéria/epidemiologia , Morbidade , Prevalência
5.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 18(1): e0011932, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38295107

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The lymphatic filariasis (LF) elimination program in all sixty-three endemic districts of Nepal was based on annual mass drug administration (MDA) using a combination of diethylcarbamazine (DEC) and albendazole for at least 5 years. The MDA program was started in the Parsa district of the Terai region and at least six rounds of MDA were completed between 2003 and 2017 in all filariasis endemic districts of Central Nepal. Transmission Assessment Survey (TAS) report indicated that circulating filarial antigen (CFA) prevalence was below the critical value i.e., ≤ 2% in selected LF endemic districts of Central Nepal. Based on the TAS report, antigen-positive cases were found clustered in the foci of those districts which were considered as "hotspots". Hence the present study was designed to assess microfilaremia in hotspots of four endemic districts of Central Nepal after the MDA program. METHODOLOGY AND PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The present study assessed microfilaremia in hotspots of four endemic districts i.e. Lalitpur and Dhading from the hilly region and Bara and Mahottari from the Terai region of Central Nepal. Night blood samples (n = 1722) were collected by finger prick method from the eligible sample population irrespective of age and sex. Community people's participation in the MDA program was ensured using a structured questionnaire and chronic clinical manifestation of LF was assessed using standard case definition. Two districts one each from the hilly region (Lalitpur district) and Terai region (Bara district) showed improved microfilaria (MF) prevalence i.e. below the critical level (<1%) while the other two districts are still over the critical level. There was a significantly high prevalence of MF in male (p = <0.05) and ≥41 years of age group (p = <0.05) community people in the hotspots of four endemic districts. People who participated in the previous rounds of the MDA program have significantly low MF prevalence. The upper confidence limit of MF prevalence in all hotspots of four districts was above the critical level (>1%). Chronic clinical manifestation of LF showed significant association with the older age group (≥41 years) but not with sex. CONCLUSIONS: The study revealed LF transmission improved in hotspots of two districts while continued in others but the risk of LF resurgence cannot be ignored since the upper confidence level of MF prevalence is over 1% in all the hotspots studied districts. High MF prevalence is well correlated with the number of MDA rounds but not with the MDA coverage. Community people involved in MDA drug uptake in any previous and last rounds have significantly less MF infection. Hence it is recommended that before deciding to stop the MDA rounds it is essential to conduct the MF survey at the hotspots of the sentinel sites.


Assuntos
Filariose Linfática , Filaricidas , Animais , Humanos , Masculino , Idoso , Filariose Linfática/epidemiologia , Filariose Linfática/prevenção & controle , Filariose Linfática/tratamento farmacológico , Administração Massiva de Medicamentos/métodos , Nepal/epidemiologia , Dietilcarbamazina/uso terapêutico , Albendazol/uso terapêutico , Prevalência , Microfilárias , Filaricidas/uso terapêutico , Wuchereria bancrofti
6.
Infect Dis Poverty ; 12(1): 77, 2023 Aug 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37608332

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Lymphatic filariasis (LF) is a debilitating and painful neglected tropical disease and is one of the leading causes of permanent disability. In many countries, the intersection of gender with various social stratifiers has influenced exposure to LF and ultimately impacting the disease burden and its elimination. This study aimed to explore the influence of gender and its intersection with other social stratifiers for the prevention and care seeking behavior of LF in Nepal. METHODS: This study employed qualitative research methods: in-depth interviews (IDIs) and focus group discussions (FGDs) for data collection in Bardiya, Nepal. A total of 22 IDIs (11 male, 11 female) and 2 FGDs (1 male and 1 female) were conducted with the community people between January and March 2020. The participants were purposively selected to represent different social stratifiers including age, sex, ethnicity, occupation. The data collected were analyzed using a thematic framework approach with use of intersectional gender analysis matrix. RESULTS: The study findings revealed that men spend more time outside their household compared to women while fulfilling their roles and responsibilities, largely determined by societal expectations and gender norms. This resulted in limited access to preventive health services for men, as they often missed annual mass drug administration programme in their community and limited access to preventive methods. Further traditional occupation, specific to particular ethnicity, influenced the vulnerability to LF for certain ethnic groups. The ability to prevent exposure varied among individuals. Although women made decisions regarding the use of protective methods, it was influenced by patriarchal and gender norms. They often felt a responsibility to take care and priorities males and other family members when resources are limited. The intersectionality of gender with other social stratifiers such as marital status, ethnicity, and geographical areas influenced individual's ability to access information related to LF and care seeking. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the findings emphasized how access to resources, division of work, norms and values and decision-making power alone and its interaction with various social stratifiers shaped peoples' vulnerability to disease, ability to prevent exposure and response to illness.


Assuntos
Filariose Linfática , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Filariose Linfática/epidemiologia , Filariose Linfática/prevenção & controle , Nepal/epidemiologia , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Coleta de Dados , Família
7.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 16(11): e0010900, 2022 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36367853

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: One challenge to achieving Lymphatic filariasis (LF) elimination is the persistent coverage-compliance gap during annual mass drug administration (MDA) and the risk of ongoing transmission among never treated individuals. Our analysis examined factors associated with individuals who were never treated during MDA. METHODS: Data were derived from two cross-sectional surveys conducted in Waihaong and Air Salobar Health Center in 2018 and 2019. We analyzed information from 1915 respondents aged 18 years or above. The study outcome was individuals who self-reported never treatment during any round of MDA. All potential predictors were grouped into socio-demographic, health system, therapy and individual factors. Logistic regression analyses were used to examine factors associated with never treatment in any year of MDA. RESULTS: Nearly half (42%) of respondents self-reported they were never treated during any round of MDA. Factors associated with increased odds of never treatment were respondents working in formal sectors (aOR = 1.75, p = 0.040), living in the catchment area of Waihaong Health Center (aOR = 2.33, p = 0.029), and those perceiving the possibility of adverse events after swallowing LF drugs (aOR = 2.86, p<0.001). Respondents reporting difficulty swallowing all the drugs (aOR = 3.12, p<0.001) and having difficulties remembering the time to swallow the drugs (aOR = 1.53, p = 0.049) also had an increased odds of never treatment. The highest odds of never treatment were associated with respondents reporting almost none of their family members took LF drugs (aOR = 3.93, p<0.001). Respondents confident that they knew how to swallow LF drugs had a reduced odds (aOR = 0.26, p<0.001) of never treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Efforts to reassure community members about adverse events, specific instructions on how to take LF drugs, and improving awareness that MDA participation is part of one's contribution to promoting community health are essential drivers for uptake with LF drugs during MDA.


Assuntos
Filariose Linfática , Filaricidas , Humanos , Filariose Linfática/tratamento farmacológico , Filariose Linfática/epidemiologia , Filariose Linfática/prevenção & controle , Administração Massiva de Medicamentos , Filaricidas/uso terapêutico , Estudos Transversais , Indonésia/epidemiologia
8.
Int Health ; 14(Suppl 2): ii55-ii63, 2022 09 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36130253

RESUMO

A hydrocoele surgery facility assessment tool (HSFAT) was developed to assess the readiness of hydrocoele surgery services in health facilities prior to implementation of hydrocoele surgical campaigns for the elimination of lymphatic filariasis (LF). A first version of the tool was piloted in Bangladesh, Malawi and Nepal in 2019, then, following feedback from country programme managers, a second version of the tool was rolled out across countries implementing hydrocoele surgery in the Accelerating the Control of Neglected Tropical Diseases (Ascend) West and Central Africa Programme, including Benin, Burkina Faso, Ghana, Guinea, Niger and Nigeria. The HSFAT assessed facilities across 10 domains: background information, essential amenities, emergency patient transfer, laboratory capacity, surgical procedures and trained staff, infection prevention, non-disposable basic equipment, disposable basic equipment, essential medicines and current hydrocoele practices. The HSFAT results highlight key areas for improvement in different countries and can be used to develop a quality improvement plan, which may include actions with agreed deadlines to improve the readiness and quality of hydrocoele surgery services provided by the health facility, prior to implementation of surgical campaigns and assist country programmes to achieve the dossier requirements set out by the World Health Organization for the elimination of LF.


Assuntos
Filariose Linfática , Hidrocele Testicular , Filariose Linfática/prevenção & controle , Instalações de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Doenças Negligenciadas , Melhoria de Qualidade , Hidrocele Testicular/cirurgia
9.
Parasit Vectors ; 15(1): 181, 2022 May 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35643508

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Lymphatic filariasis (LF) is a neglected tropical disease (NTD). In 2000 the World Health Organization (WHO) established the Global Programme to Eliminate Lymphatic Filariasis (GPELF). A key component of this programme is mass drug administration (MDA). Between 2000 and 2020, the GPELF has delivered over 8.6 billion treatments to at-risk populations. The last impact assessment of the programme evaluated the treatments provided between 2000-2014. The goal of this analysis is to provide an updated health impact assessment of the programme, based on the numbers treated between 2000-2020. METHODS: We updated and refined a previously established model that estimates the number of clinical manifestations and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) averted by the treatments provided by the GPELF. The model comprises three different population cohorts that can benefit from MDA provided (those protected from acquiring infection, those with subclinical morbidity prevented from progressing and those with clinical disease alleviated). The treatment numbers were updated for all participating countries using data from the WHO. In addition, data relating to the estimated number of individuals initially at risk of LF infection were updated where possible. Finally, the DALY calculations were refined to use updated disability weights. RESULTS: Using the updated model and corresponding treatment data, we projected that the total benefit cohort of the GPELF (2000-2020) would consist of approximately 58.5 million individuals and the programme would avert 44.3 million chronic LF cases. Over the lifetime of the benefit cohorts, this corresponded to 244 million DALYs being averted. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that substantial health benefits have resulted from the first 20 years of the GPELF. It is important to note that the GPELF would have both additional benefits not quantified by the DALY burden metric as well as benefits on other co-endemic diseases (such as soil-transmitted helminths, onchocerciasis and scabies)-making the total health benefit underestimated. As with the past impact assessments, these results further justify the value and importance of continued investment in the GPELF.


Assuntos
Filariose Linfática , Filariose Linfática/tratamento farmacológico , Filariose Linfática/epidemiologia , Filariose Linfática/prevenção & controle , Saúde Global , Avaliação do Impacto na Saúde , Humanos , Administração Massiva de Medicamentos , Doenças Negligenciadas/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças Negligenciadas/epidemiologia , Doenças Negligenciadas/prevenção & controle
10.
Trop Doct ; 52(4): 556-559, 2022 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35770893

RESUMO

Sustainable Development Goal-3 (SDG) aims to eliminate lymphatic filariasis by 2030 through >65% coverage and compliance of mass drug administration (MDA), the preventive chemotherapy strategy of delivering anthelminthic drugs. However, the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted such programmes, yet MDA was administered during February 2021 in Odisha, India. We aimed to assess the coverage and compliance of the present round of MDA amidst the pandemic and explore factors for non-compliance in Cuttack district of Odisha, a filariasis endemic area. Community-based participants enrolled through multistage stratified sampling were administered a semi-structured questionnaire following COVID-19 protocols. The coverage of MDA was 93.2% whereas consumption was 73.7%. Participants reported that healthcare workers were motivated and satisfactorily explained the benefits of MDA but still fear of side-effects was the major cause of non-compliance. Nonetheless, this recent round of MDA was effective, despite challenges posed by the ongoing pandemic.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Filariose Linfática , Filaricidas , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Erradicação de Doenças/métodos , Filariose Linfática/tratamento farmacológico , Filariose Linfática/epidemiologia , Filariose Linfática/prevenção & controle , Filaricidas/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Índia/epidemiologia , Administração Massiva de Medicamentos , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Desenvolvimento Sustentável
11.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 16(2): e0010231, 2022 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35213537

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Lymphatic filariasis (LF) has been targeted for global elimination as a public health problem since 1997. The primary strategy to interrupt transmission is annual mass drug administration (MDA) for ≥5 years. The transmission assessment survey (TAS) was developed as a decision-making tool to measure LF antigenemia in children to determine when MDA in a region can be stopped. The objective of this study was to investigate potential sampling strategies for follow-up of LF-positive children identified in TAS to detect evidence of ongoing transmission. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPLE FINDINGS: Nippes Department in Haiti passed TAS 1 with 2 positive cases and stopped MDA in 2015; however, 8 positive children were found during TAS 2 in 2017, which prompted a more thorough assessment of ongoing transmission. Purposive sampling was used to select the closest 50 households to each index case household, and systematic random sampling was used to select 20 households from each index case census enumeration area. All consenting household members aged ≥2 years were surveyed and tested for circulating filarial antigen (CFA) using the rapid filarial test strip and for Wb123-specific antibodies using the Filaria Detect IgG4 ELISA. Among 1,927 participants, 1.5% were CFA-positive and 4.5% were seropositive. CFA-positive individuals were identified for 6 of 8 index cases. Positivity ranged from 0.4-2.4%, with highest positivity in the urban commune Miragoane. Purposive sampling found the highest number of CFA-positives (17 vs. 9), and random sampling found a higher percent positive (2.4% vs. 1.4%). CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Overall, both purposive and random sampling methods were reasonable and achievable methods of TAS follow-up in resource-limited settings. Both methods identified additional CFA-positives in close geographic proximity to LF-positive children found by TAS, and both identified strong signs of ongoing transmission in the large urban commune of Miragoane. These findings will help inform standardized guidelines for post-TAS surveillance.


Assuntos
Filariose Linfática , Filaricidas , Animais , Antígenos de Helmintos/uso terapêutico , Criança , Filariose Linfática/tratamento farmacológico , Filariose Linfática/epidemiologia , Filariose Linfática/prevenção & controle , Filaricidas/uso terapêutico , Seguimentos , Haiti/epidemiologia , Humanos , Administração Massiva de Medicamentos/métodos , Prevalência , Wuchereria bancrofti
12.
Int J Health Policy Manag ; 11(1): 80-89, 2022 Jan 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34814671

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Surgery for hydrocele is commonly promoted as part of morbidity management and disability prevention (MMDP) services for lymphatic filariasis (LF). However, uptake of these surgeries has been suboptimal owing to several community level barriers that have triggered mistrust in such services. This study aimed at documenting mechanisms of unlocking trust in community health systems (CHSs) in the context of a LF hydrocele management project that was implemented in Luangwa District, Zambia. METHODS: Qualitative data was collected through in-depth interviews (IDIs) and focus group discussions (FGDs) (n=45) in February 2020 in Luangwa District. Thirty-one IDIs were conducted with hydrocele patients, community health workers (CHWs), health workers, traditional leaders and traditional healers. Two FGDs were also conducted with CHWs who had been involved in project implementation with seven participants per group. Data was analyzed using a thematic analysis approach. RESULTS: The use of locally appropriate communication strategies, development of community driven referral systems, working with credible community intermediaries as well as strengthening health systems capacity through providing technical and logistical support enhanced trust in surgery for hydrocele and uptake of the surgeries. CONCLUSION: Implementation of community led communication and referral systems as well as strengthening health services are vital in unlocking trust in health systems as such mechanisms trigger authentic partnerships, including mutual respect and recognition in the CHS. The mechanisms also enhance confidence in health services among community members.


Assuntos
Filariose Linfática , Planejamento em Saúde Comunitária , Agentes Comunitários de Saúde , Filariose Linfática/prevenção & controle , Grupos Focais , Humanos , Masculino , Morbidade , Projetos Piloto , Confiança , Zâmbia
13.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 15(11): e0009894, 2021 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34813600

RESUMO

This study presents a methodology for using tracer indicators to measure the effects of disease-specific programs on national health systems. The methodology is then used to analyze the effects of Bangladesh's Lymphatic Filariasis Elimination Program, a disease-specific program, on the health system. Using difference-in-differences models and secondary data from population-based household surveys, this study compares changes over time in the utilization rates of eight essential health services and incidences of catastrophic health expenditures between individuals and households, respectively, of lymphatic filariasis hyper-endemic districts (treatment districts) and of hypo- and non-endemic districts (control districts). Utilization of all health services increased from year 2000 to year 2014 for the entire population but more so for the population living in treatment districts. However, when the services were analyzed individually, the difference-in-differences between the two populations was insignificant. Disadvantaged populations (i.e., populations that lived in rural areas, belonged to lower wealth quintiles, or did not attend school) were less likely to access essential health services. After five years of program interventions, households in control districts had a lower incidence of catastrophic health expenditures at several thresholds measured using total household expenditures and total non-food expenditures as denominators. Using essential health service coverage rates as outcome measures, the Lymphatic Filariasis Elimination Program cannot be said to have strengthened or weakened the health system. We can also say that there is a positive association between the Lymphatic Filariasis Elimination Program's interventions and lowered incidence of catastrophic health expenditures.


Assuntos
Erradicação de Doenças/economia , Filariose Linfática/prevenção & controle , Gastos em Saúde , Bangladesh/epidemiologia , Filariose Linfática/economia , Filariose Linfática/epidemiologia , Características da Família , Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Cobertura do Seguro , Pobreza , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde
14.
Expert Rev Vaccines ; 20(11): 1471-1482, 2021 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34633881

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Lymphatic filariasis (LF), also known as elephantiasis, has been recognized by the world health organization and the centers for disease control and prevention as one of the neglected tropical diseases. The huge prevalence and risk of manifestation to date reflect the poor management of this disease. The disease poses vast public health and socio-economic burdens and generates a dire need for the development of a prophylactic solution for mass administration. AREAS COVERED: Vaccination has been a sought-out strategy for dealing with ever-evolving infectious diseases and can be duly tuned to become a cost effective means of disease control and eventual eradication. In this review, we highlight the epidemiology of LF with the current diagnosis and treatment modules. The need for the development of a potential vaccine candidates, and challenges are discussed. The evidence presented in this review aims to enlighten the readers regarding the essential factors governing LF and its management using prophylactic measures. EXPERT OPINION: The complex nature of filarial parasites is evident from the absence of a single vaccine for LF. The development and selection of an appropriate preclinical model and its translation into clinical practice is deemed to be a major task needing in-depth evaluation to formulate an effective vaccine. Explorations of the existing vaccine platforms would serve to be an apt strategy in this direction.


Assuntos
Filariose Linfática , Vacinas , Análise Custo-Benefício , Filariose Linfática/tratamento farmacológico , Filariose Linfática/epidemiologia , Filariose Linfática/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Prevalência , Saúde Pública , Vacinas/uso terapêutico
15.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 15(4): e0009332, 2021 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33878110

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs) are a group of several communicable and non-communicable diseases prevalent in tropical and subtropical areas. The co-endemicity of these diseases, the similarity of their clinical signs, and the need to maximize limited financial and human resources suggest the importance of adoptingan integratedapproach to their prevention and treatment. AIMS: This study describes the development of a comprehensive package of physical, mental health and psychosocial care for people with lower-limb lymphoedema caused bypodoconiosis, lymphatic filariasis (LF)or leprosy as part of the EnDPoINT program in Ethiopia. METHOD: The care package was developed using a mixed-methods approach, consisting of a literature review, situational analysis, Theory of Change (ToC) workshops, qualitative research, and additional workshops to fine-tune the draft care package. The care package was developed between March 2018 and January 2020 in Addis Ababa and the implementation research site, Awi zone in the North-West of Ethiopia. RESULTS: The holistic care package includes components implemented at three levels of the health care system:health organization, facility, and community. Sections of the care package are directed at strengthening capacity building, program management, community engagement, awareness-raising, stigma-reduction, morbidity management, disability prevention, follow-up visits, referral linkage, community-based rehabilitation, and monitoring and evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: The study developed a holistic integrated care package for lower limb disorder and co-morbid mental health problems caused by podoconiosis, LF or leprosy. The approach has the potential to significantly reduce lower limb disorder-associated morbidity, disability, and psychosocial problems. It also standardizes a scalable approach appropriate for the Ethiopian setting and, most likely, other countries where these NTDs are present.


Assuntos
Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/organização & administração , Filariose Linfática/prevenção & controle , Elefantíase/prevenção & controle , Hanseníase/prevenção & controle , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Etiópia , Feminino , Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Extremidade Inferior , Masculino , Saúde Mental , Reabilitação Psiquiátrica , Pesquisa Qualitativa
16.
Parasit Vectors ; 14(1): 23, 2021 Jan 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33407812

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization has targeted lymphatic filariasis (LF) for elimination as a public health problem and recommends, among other measures, post-elimination surveillance of LF. The identification of sensitive and specific surveillance tools is therefore a research priority. The Wuchereria bancrofti-specific antigen Wb123-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Wb123 ELISA) detects antibodies to the recombinant Wb123 antigen of W. bancrofti and may be useful as a surveillance tool for LF. Six years after stopping mass drug administration to eliminate LF and recording successful results on two post-treatment transmission assessment surveys, a study was conducted in Togo aimed at helping to identify the role of the Wb123 ELISA in post-validation surveillance of LF. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study in eight previously LF-endemic districts and one non-endemic district in Togo. In each sub-district of these nine districts, two schools were selected and 15 children aged 6 to 9 years old at each school provided finger-stick blood for testing for antibodies to Wb123 using the Filaria Detect™ IgG4 ELISA kit® (InBios, International, Inc., Seattle, WA, USA). RESULTS: A total of 2654 children aged 6 to 9 years old were tested in 134 schools in the nine districts. Overall, 4.7% (126/2654) children tested positive for antibodies to the Wb123 antigen of W. bancrofti. The prevalence of Wb123 antibodies varied across the eight previously endemic LF districts, from 1.56 to 6.62%. The highest prevalence, 6.99%, was found in the non-endemic district, but this was not significantly different from the average of all the LF districts (4.49%, P = 0.062). CONCLUSIONS: The Wb123 ELISA was positive in 4.7% of Togolese school-age children who were almost certainly unexposed to LF. This apparent lack of specificity in the Togo context makes it difficult to establish a seroprevalence threshold that could serve to signal LF resurgence in the country, precluding the use of this test for post-validation surveillance in Togo. There remains a need to develop a useful and reliable test for post-elimination surveillance for LF in humans.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Anti-Helmínticos/sangue , Filariose Linfática , Wuchereria bancrofti/imunologia , Animais , Antígenos de Helmintos/sangue , Criança , Estudos Transversais , Filariose Linfática/diagnóstico , Filariose Linfática/prevenção & controle , Monitoramento Epidemiológico , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Prevalência , Saúde Pública/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Soroepidemiológicos , Togo/epidemiologia
17.
Int J Infect Dis ; 102: 422-428, 2021 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33130207

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends Transmission Assessment Surveys (TAS) to determine when an evaluation unit (EU) (a designated population survey area) has achieved elimination of transmission of the vector-borne macroparasitic disease Lymphatic Filariasis (LF). These determinations are based on combining data from multiple survey units within an EU; it is unclear how underlying cluster-level variation influences the outcome of the TAS at EU level. We simulate LF infection distribution in an EU and compare three methods for assessing whether LF elimination has occurred based on currently recommended decision thresholds and sampling methods. METHODS: We simulate an EU divided into clusters of varying size and disease prevalence. We produce 1000 samples according to LF TAS examples and WHO guidelines and compare three decision-making approaches: lot quality assurance sampling (LQAS) (recommended by WHO), one-sided interval estimate (CI), and nth order statistic (MAX). Summary statistics demonstrating the "pass" rate for the EU under different disease transmission conditions are generated using a versatile SAS® macro. RESULTS: As the prevalence of LF decreases, the LQAS and CI approaches produce increased likelihood of a pass outcome for an EU while some cluster units may still have a high likelihood of transmission. The MAX provides an alternative that increases the likelihood of determining a pass only once the whole area has a low likelihood of transmission. LQAS and CI approaches designed to estimate the LF prevalence in the EU miss hotspots that will continue to transmit infection while the MAX approach focuses on identifying clusters with high risk of transmission. CONCLUSIONS: The current TAS methodology has a flaw that may result in false predictions of LF transmission interruption throughout an EU. Modifying the TAS methodology to address results from extreme clusters rather than being based on mean prevalence over an EU will result in greater success for global elimination of LF.


Assuntos
Filariose Linfática/epidemiologia , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Simulação por Computador , Erradicação de Doenças , Filariose Linfática/patologia , Filariose Linfática/prevenção & controle , Filariose Linfática/transmissão , Humanos , Amostragem para Garantia da Qualidade de Lotes , Doenças Negligenciadas , Prevalência , Inquéritos e Questionários , Clima Tropical
18.
Int Health ; 13(Suppl 1): S65-S70, 2020 12 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33349883

RESUMO

The Global Programme to Eliminate Lymphatic Filariasis (GPELF) was established with the ambitious goal of eliminating LF as a public health problem. The remarkable success of the GPELF over the past 2 decades in carrying out its principal strategy of scaling up and scaling down mass drug administration has relied first on the development of a rigorous monitoring and evaluation (M&E) framework and then the willingness of the World Health Organization and its community of partners to modify this framework in response to the practical experiences of national programmes. This flexibility was facilitated by the strong partnership that developed among researchers, LF programme managers and donors willing to support the necessary research agenda. This brief review summarizes the historical evolution of the GPELF M&E strategies and highlights current research needed to achieve the elimination goal.


Assuntos
Filariose Linfática , Filaricidas , Filariose Linfática/tratamento farmacológico , Filariose Linfática/epidemiologia , Filariose Linfática/prevenção & controle , Filaricidas/uso terapêutico , Saúde Global , Humanos , Administração Massiva de Medicamentos , Organização Mundial da Saúde
19.
Int Health ; 13(Suppl 1): S71-S74, 2020 12 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33349885

RESUMO

The Global Programme to Eliminate Lymphatic Filariasis (GPELF) was established by the WHO in 2000. It aims to eliminate lymphatic filariasis as a public health problem. This paper summarises the key estimates of the cost-effectiveness and economic benefits related to the mass drug administration (MDA) provided by the GPELF. Several studies have investigated the cost-effectiveness of this MDA, estimating the cost per disability-adjusted life year (DALY) averted. These cost-effectiveness estimates have consistently classed the intervention as cost-effective and as favourable compared with other public health interventions conducted in low- and middle-income countries. Studies have also found that the MDA used for lymphatic filariasis control generates significant economic benefits. Although these studies are positive, there are still important gaps that warrant further health economic research (particularly, the evaluation of alternative interventions, further evaluation of morbidity management strategies and evaluation of interventions for settings coendemic with Loa loa). To conclude, health economic studies for a programme as large as the GPELF are subject to uncertainty. That said, the GPELF has consistently been estimated to be cost-effective and to generate notable economic benefits by a number of independent studies.


Assuntos
Filariose Linfática , Análise Custo-Benefício , Filariose Linfática/tratamento farmacológico , Filariose Linfática/epidemiologia , Filariose Linfática/prevenção & controle , Saúde Global , Humanos , Administração Massiva de Medicamentos , Saúde Pública
20.
Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis ; 20(12): 875-881, 2020 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32795160

RESUMO

China used to be one of the most heavily endemic countries for lymphatic filariasis (LF) in the world. Bancroftian filariasis, which is caused by the filarioid nematode Wuchereria bancrofti, is the only filariasis in Shandong Province. A total of 864 endemic counties (cities) in 16 provinces/autonomous regions/municipalities with a total population of 330 million people were at risk of infection. Shandong Province was a highly LF-endemic area in the 1950s, the epidemiological investigation of LF conducted in 1957 indicated that the disease was endemic in 74 counties and the highest microfilaria rate was up to 26%. There were ∼5 million people in the province infected with LF; among which almost 2.5 million people had lymphedema, elephantiasis, or hydrocele. Through vigorous prevention and scientific research, Shandong Province was the first to propose to treat LF with fortified diethylcarbamazine salt, more than 25 million people in the province had taken the salt, and more than 3 million people took intermittent medication. After more than 50 years of unremitting efforts, Shandong Province basically eliminated LF in 1983 and became the first province in China that successfully eradicated LF in 2004, which has played an important role in accelerating the elimination of filariasis in the country in 2007 and has made tremendous contributions to social and economic development of China. Since 1980, Shandong Province has carried out extensive international cooperation as the WHO Collaborating Center for Lymphatic Filariasis. This article is intended to share the experience in eliminating LF to other parts of the world and improve public health capacity in regions such as Africa and Oceania where the disease is still endemic for interest.


Assuntos
Erradicação de Doenças/métodos , Filariose Linfática/epidemiologia , Filariose Linfática/prevenção & controle , China/epidemiologia , Serviços de Saúde Comunitária , Filariose Linfática/transmissão , Humanos , Vigilância da População/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA