Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant ; 21(11): 1921-5, 2015 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26033279

RESUMO

There are limited data available supporting the use of the recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), tbo-filgrastim, rather than traditionally used filgrastim to mobilize peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) or to accelerate engraftment after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). We sought to compare the efficacy and cost of tbo-filgrastim to filgrastim in these settings. Patients diagnosed with lymphoma or plasma cell disorders undergoing G-CSF mobilization, with or without plerixafor, were included in this retrospective analysis. The primary outcome was total collected CD34(+) cells/kg. Secondary mobilization endpoints included peripheral CD34(+) cells/µL on days 4 and 5 of mobilization, adjunctive use of plerixafor, CD34(+) cells/kg collected on day 5, number of collection days and volumes processed, number of collections reaching 5 million CD34(+) cells/kg, and percent reaching target collection goal in 1 day. Secondary engraftment endpoints included time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment, number of blood product transfusions required before engraftment, events of febrile neutropenia, and length of stay. A total of 185 patients were included in the final analysis. Patients receiving filgrastim (n = 86) collected a median of 5.56 × 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg, compared with a median of 5.85 × 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg in the tbo-filgrastim group (n = 99; P = .58). There were no statistically significant differences in all secondary endpoints with the exception of apheresis volumes processed (tbo-filgrastim, 17.0 liters versus filgrastim, 19.7 liters; P < .01) and mean platelet transfusions (tbo-filgrastim, 1.7 units versus filgrastim, 1.4 units; P = .04). In conclusion, tbo-filgrastim demonstrated similar CD34(+) yield compared with filgrastim in mobilization and post-transplantation settings, with no clinically meaningful differences in secondary efficacy and safety endpoints. Furthermore, tbo-filgrastim utilization was associated with cost savings of approximately $1406 per patient utilizing average wholesale price.


Assuntos
Filgrastim/farmacologia , Mobilização de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/economia , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Linfoma de Células B/terapia , Linfoma de Células T/terapia , Mieloma Múltiplo/terapia , Neoplasias de Plasmócitos/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Antígenos CD34/imunologia , Benzilaminas , Plaquetas/citologia , Plaquetas/efeitos dos fármacos , Plaquetas/imunologia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Ciclamos , Feminino , Filgrastim/análogos & derivados , Filgrastim/economia , Sobrevivência de Enxerto , Mobilização de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/métodos , Compostos Heterocíclicos/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/economia , Linfoma de Células B/economia , Linfoma de Células B/imunologia , Linfoma de Células B/patologia , Linfoma de Células T/economia , Linfoma de Células T/imunologia , Linfoma de Células T/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mieloma Múltiplo/economia , Mieloma Múltiplo/imunologia , Mieloma Múltiplo/patologia , Neoplasias de Plasmócitos/economia , Neoplasias de Plasmócitos/imunologia , Neoplasias de Plasmócitos/patologia , Neutrófilos/citologia , Neutrófilos/efeitos dos fármacos , Neutrófilos/imunologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Transplante Autólogo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA