Patellar Fracture Surgery Performed Autonomously by Residents, Yields Similar Short-Term Outcomes to Surgery Performed by Fellowship-Trained Surgeons.

BACKGROUND: Open reduction and internal fixation are the gold-standard treatment for displaced patellar fractures. The current literature remains inconclusive on the relationship between resident participation in the operating room and optimal patient outcomes. We hypothesize that surgeries performed solely by residents, without attending supervision, can provide similar outcomes to those performed by fellowship-trained orthopedic surgeons, providing new insights into the relationship between resident autonomy and surgical outcomes in the field of orthopedic trauma. METHODS: A tertiary trauma center cohort was retrospectively reviewed for all surgically treated patellar fractures between 2015 and 2020. The cohort was divided into 2 groups: patients operated by residents and patients operated by orthopedic trauma specialists. Demographics, surgical parameters, and radiographs were compared between the groups to evaluate complications and reoperation rates, radiographic outcomes (such as hardware failure, or loss of reduction), and clinical outcomes (including residual pain, painful hardware, decreased range of motion, and infections). RESULTS: A total of 129 patellar fractures were included in the study. Demographics and ASA were similar between the groups. There were no significant differences in complications (p = 0.900) or reoperation rates (p = 0.817), with an average follow-up time of 8 months (SD ± 5.3). Residents had significantly longer surgery duration (p =0.002). However, the overall length of stay was shorter in the resident group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The study shows patellar fracture surgery performed by adequately trained residents can provide similar outcomes to those performed by fellowship-trained orthopaedic trauma surgeons. These findings highlight the significance of surgical autonomy in residency and its role in contemporary surgical education.

The impact of the AO Foundation on fracture care: An evaluation of 60 years AO Foundation.

OBJECTIVES: Sixty years ago, the Association of Osteosynthesis (AO) was founded with the aim to improve fracture treatment and has since grown into one of the largest medical associations worldwide. Aim of this study was to evaluate AO's impact on science, education, patient care and the MedTech business. DESIGN/METHODS: Impact evaluations were conducted as appropriate for the individual domains: Impact on science was measured by analyzing citation frequencies of publications promoted by AO. Impact on education was evaluated by analyzing the evolution of number and location of AO courses. Impact on patient care was evaluated with a health economic model analyzing cost changes and years of life gained through the introduction of osteosynthesis in 17 high-income countries (HICs). Impact on MedTech business was evaluated by analyzing sales data of AO-associated products. RESULTS: Thirty-five AO papers and 2 major AO textbooks are cited at remarkable frequencies in high ranking journals with up to 2000 citations/year. The number of AO courses steadily increased with a total of 645'000 participants, 20'000 teaching days and 2'500 volunteer faculty members so far. The introduction of osteosynthesis saved at least 925 billion Swiss Francs [CHF] in the 17 HICs analyzed and had an impact on avoiding premature deaths comparable to the use of antihypertensive drugs. AO-associated products generated sales of 55 billion CHF. CONCLUSION: AO's impact on science, education, patient care, and the MedTech business was significant because AO addressed hitherto unmet needs by combining activities that mutually enriched and reinforced each other.

Critiquing operative fracture fixation: the development of an assessment tool.

PURPOSE: Assessments are fundamentally important for training surgeons. Currently, there are no formal means of assessing operative fracture fixation. An assessment tool has been developed which can be used by trainers to critique the quality of a trainee's operative fracture fixation. The tool is based on the AO principles of fracture management. The reliability and validity of the assessment were tested in a prospective study. METHODS: The assessment tool comprises of 4 domains focusing on the different factors pertinent to fracture fixation (reduction, stability, implant and overall impression). Reliability and validity were evaluated by asking 10 consultant trauma and orthopaedic surgeons to score 20 test cases on two different occasions at least 7 weeks apart. Internal consistency was assessed by Cronbach's alpha. Inter-rater reliability and test-retest reliability were assessed by the inter-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and content validity by the content validity ratio (CVR). RESULTS: Cronbach's alpha was 0.976, with all component criteria correlating well with each other. Total score inter-rater reliability, for a single assessor, as given by the ICC, was 0.708. Overall test-retest reliability was 0.961. The CVR for the assessment tool was 0.65 (which is above the critical value for establishing validity with 10 assessors). CONCLUSIONS: Internal consistency is demonstrated by the excellent Cronbach's alpha with substantial single assessor and excellent test-retest reliability also shown. The CVR above the critical value illustrates that the assessment is valid. The assessment tool has a number of applications within training and service evaluation that could benefit the global orthopaedic community.

Objective structured assessment of technical skill in upper extremity surgery.

PURPOSE: Objective assessment of technical skills in hand surgery has been lacking. This article reports on an Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills format of a multiple bench-station evaluation of orthopedic surgery residents' technical skills for 3 common upper extremity surgeries. METHODS: Twenty-seven residents (6 postgraduate year [PGY] 2, 8 PGY 3, 8 PGY 4, and 5 PGY 5) participated in the examination. Each resident performed surgery on a cadaveric specimen at 3 stations, trigger finger release (TFR), open carpal tunnel release, and distal radius fracture fixation. A board-certified hand surgeon evaluated trainee performance at each station, using a procedure-specific detailed checklist, a validated global rating scale, and pass/fail assessment. A resident post-testing evaluation was collected. RESULTS: Construct validity with correlation between year in training and detailed checklist scores was demonstrated for TFR and carpal tunnel release; between year in training and global rating scores for TFR and distal radius fracture fixation; and between year in training and pass/fail assessment for TFR. Criterion validity was demonstrated by the correlation between global rating scale scores, detailed checklist scores, and pass/fail assessment for TFR, carpal tunnel release, and distal radius fracture fixation. Time to complete the surgery was not correlated with surgical performance. Residents rated the multiple-station Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills format as highly educational. CONCLUSIONS: This study reports that a surgeon's ability to release a trigger finger does not correlate specifically to his or her ability to perform a carpal tunnel release or to perform plate fixation of a radius fracture. The results of this study would indicate that, for 3 different surgical simulations representing procedures of varying complexity, assessments by a single assessment tool is not adequate. To completely understand a resident's abilities, assessment by checklist (understanding the steps of the surgery), global rating scales (assessment of basic surgical skills in light of lesser or greater complexity surgeries), and pass/fail assessment (examination of adverse events) are all necessary components. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic II.

Virtual reality assessment of technical skill using the Bonedoc DHS simulator.

The Bonedoc DHS simulator is a virtual reality simulator of screw and plate fixation of hip fractures which runs on a standard PC. We hypothesised that the simulator would be able to discriminate between subjects with different levels of operative experience. Three groups (medical students (MSs), basic trainees (BTs), and advanced trainees (ATs)) performed six virtual operations. Measurements included: reduction position, incision length, misplaced drill-holes, final screw placement, X-rays taken, surgical time as well as computer and operative experience. The accuracy, number of X-rays and speed were significantly different between novices and trainee surgeons (p<0.01, p<0.05, p<0.05). Intra-articular screw penetration by the medical students occurred 12 times, basic trainees 6 times and advanced trainees twice (p<0.01, MS vs. trainees). Amongst trainees, the advanced trainees placed the lag screw more accurately and took less X-rays (ns). The basic trainees performed the complete procedure fastest at 6 min compared to ATs at 9 min (p<0.05) but were not as accurate. The Bonedoc DHS simulator provides a means to discriminate between novices and trainee surgeons.