Safety and Outcome Measures of Ankle Open Reduction and Internal Fixation in an Ambulatory Surgical Center.

The transition of traditionally hospital-based orthopedic procedures to the ambulatory surgery center setting provides many benefits from a patient care and financial perspective. Specifically, closed ankle fractures can potentially be managed at such centers without needing hospitalization. Adding to the paucity of data, this study describes the safety, cost, and outcomes of patients undergoing ankle fracture repair in an ambulatory surgery center. A retrospective chart review of 100 patients who underwent ankle fracture open reduction and internal fixation from a single ambulatory surgery center by 1 surgeon were reviewed. Demographic data, surgical characteristics including operating time and cost were collected. Short- and long-term complications, as well as, reoperation rates were reported and functional outcomes were described. Of the 100 patients, 59% were female and the overall average age was 50 ± 16 years. The average cost per case was $8,709.63 ± 6,360.18. The short-term complication rate was 16%, with surgical site infection reported as the most common complication. No postoperative hospital admissions were reported. Planned and unplanned hardware removal was performed in 7% and 5% of patients, respectively. The delayed union rate was 13%, in which 86% shared a history of smoking. Smoking history was the only statistically significant predictor of prolonged bone healing (p = .002). This investigation demonstrates low complications rates for surgeries performed in a surgery center when compared to historical rates of those procedures performed in the hospital. These results suggest that ambulatory surgery center-based ankle fracture repair does not increase complications while may decrease overall cost when compared to ankle ORIF in a hospital setting.

Cost analysis and clinical outcomes of anatomic pre-contoured locking versus conventional plates for distal fibula ankle fractures.

PURPOSE: To analyze differences in union, complication rates and cost from surgical fixation of distal fibula fractures with fibular plating implants. METHODS: In total, 380 adult patients from 2012 to 2015 treated with 12 fibular plates from 4 different manufacturers utilized by 9 surgeons were retrospectively reviewed. They were stratified into a conventional one-third tubular fibular plate group, pre-contoured anatomic locking plate group, or a heterogeneous group including 3.5-mm reconstruction, one-third tubular locking, composite, and limited compression plates. The outcomes included failure of fixation, deep infection requiring debridement, time to union, anatomic reduction, superficial infection, hardware removal, and post-traumatic arthritis. Plate and screw costs were calculated from hospital billing records. RESULTS: Pre-contoured locking plates were used in older, female patients with a greater number of comorbidities. Open injuries and OTA 44B fractures were more likely to be an indication for pre-contoured plates. There was no difference noted in time to union between the different plating groups. Risk factors for deep infection requiring debridement included a history of tobacco use, open fractures, and pre-contoured locking plates relative to the conventional plating group. The pre-contoured plating group was on average $586 more expensive compared to the conventional group. CONCLUSION: Pre-contoured locking plates achieved similar radiographic outcomes compared to conventional plates with an increased risk of complications and higher cost. Surgeons should consider their choice of implant based on the patient's fracture pattern, underlying comorbidities, and risk for infection.

Hip fractures after 60 years of age in France in 2005-2017: Nationwide sample of statutory-health-insurance beneficiaries.

BACKGROUND: Proximal femoral factures (PFFs) constitute a heavy medical, social, and economic burden. Overall, orthopaedic conditions vary widely in France regarding the patients involved and treatments applied. For PFFs specifically, data are limited. Moreover, the ongoing expansion of geriatric orthopaedics holds promise for improving overall postoperative survival. The objectives of this retrospective study of a nationwide French database were: 1) to describe the pathway of patients with PFFs regarding access to care, healthcare institutions involved, and times to management; 2) to look for associations linking these parameters to post-operative mortality. HYPOTHESIS: Across France, variations exist in healthcare service availability and time to management for patients with PFFs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of data in a de-identified representative sample of statutory-health-insurance beneficiaries in France (Échantillon généraliste des bénéficiaires, EGB, containing data for 1/97 beneficiaries) was conducted. All patients older than 60 years of age who were managed for PFFs between 2005 and 2017 were included. The following data were collected for each patient: age, management method, Charlson's Comorbidity Index (CCI), home-to-hospital distance by road, and type of hospital (public, non-profit private, or for-profit private), and time to surgery were collected. The study outcomes were the incidence of PFF, mortality during the first postoperative year, changes in mortality between 2005 and 2017, and prognostic factors. RESULTS: In total 8026 fractures were included. The 7561 patients had a median age of 83.8 years and a mean CCI of 4.6; both parameters increased steadily over time, by 0.18 years and 0.06 points per year, respectively (p<10-4 for both comparisons). Management was by total hip replacement in 3299 cases and internal fixation in 4262 cases; this information was not available for 465 fractures. The overall incidence increased from 90/100,000 in 2008 to 116/100,000 in 2017 (p=0.03). Of the 8026 fractures, 5865 (73.1%) were managed in public hospitals (and this proportion increased significantly over time), 1629 (20.3%) in non-profit private hospitals (decrease over time), and 264 (3.3%) in for-profit private hospitals. The home-to-hospital distance ranged from 7.5 to 38.5km and increased over time by 0.26km/year (95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 0.15-0.38) (p<10-4). Median time to surgery was 1 day [1-3 days], with no significant difference across hospital types. Mortality rates at 90 days and 1 year were 10.5% (843/8026) and 20.8% (1673/8026), respectively. Two factors were significantly associated with day-90 mortality: the CCI (hazard ratio [HR], 1.087 [95%CI: 1.07-1.10] [p<10-4]) and time to surgery>1 day (HR 1.35 [95%CI: 1.15-1.50] [p<0.0001]). Day-90 mortality decreased significantly from 2005 to 2017 (HR 0.95 [95%CI: 0.92-0.97] [p<10-4]), with no centre effect. CONCLUSION: The management of PFF in patients older than 60 varied widely across France. Time to surgery longer than 1 day was a major adverse prognostic factor whose effects persisted throughout the first year. This factor was present in over half the patients. Day-90 mortality decreased significantly from 2005 to 2017 despite increases in age and comorbidities. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV Retrospective cohort study.

Tibial Plateau Fractures Complicated by Compartment Syndrome Are Associated With a 3 Times Higher Cost of Care.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the impact of acute compartment syndrome (ACS) and identify cost drivers of 1-year total treatment costs for operative tibial plateau fractures. DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS: 337 patients with tibial plateau fractures, 24 of which were complicated by ACS. OUTCOMES: The primary outcome was total treatment cost over the first year for operatively treated tibial plateau fractures. The secondary objective was to use regression analysis to identify significant cost drivers. RESULTS: The diagnosis of ACS was associated with 2.85 times higher total treatment cost ( P < 0.001). ACS demonstrated increased total treatment cost when controlling for polytrauma ( P < 0.001) and postoperative infection ( P < 0.001). Regression analysis identified 5 variables significantly associated with total cost of care: body mass index, injury severity score, ACS, staged external fixation, and locking fixation ( P < 0.001; R 2 = 0.57). The diagnosis of ACS had the largest impact on total cost with a 3.5× greater impact on cost compared with the next highest variable, staged external fixation. CONCLUSIONS: Tibial plateau fractures complicated by ACS are associated with 2.85 times higher treatment costs over a 1-year period. There were 5 significant variables identified by regression analysis with ACS having the highest impact on total treatment. Together, these 5 factors account for 57% of treatment cost variability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Economic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Acute Fixation Protocol for High-Energy Tibial Pilon Fractures Decreases Time to Fixation and Lowers Operative Costs Without Affecting Wound Complications and Reoperations.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether an acute fixation protocol for high-energy tibial pilon fractures increases the rate of wound complications. DESIGN: Retrospective comparative study. SETTING: Urban level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: One hundred forty-seven patients with OTA/AO 43B and 43C high-energy tibial pilon fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). INTERVENTION: Acute (<48 hours) versus delayed ORIF protocols. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: Wound complications, reoperations, time to fixation, operative costs, and hospital length of stay (LOS). Patients were compared by protocol, regardless of ORIF timing, for an intention-to-treat analysis. RESULTS: Thirty-five and 112 high-energy pilon fractures were treated under the acute and delayed ORIF protocols, respectively. In the acute ORIF protocol group, 82.9% of patients received acute ORIF versus 15.2% of patients in the standard delayed protocol group. The 2 groups had no observed difference (OD) in the rate of wound complications (OD -5.7%, confidence interval (95% CI) -16.1% to 7.8%; P = 0.56) or reoperations (OD -3.9%, 95% CI, -14.1% to 9.4%; P = 0.76). The acute ORIF protocol group had a shorter LOS (OD -2.0, 95% CI, -4.0 to 0.0; P = 0.02) and lower operative costs (OD $-2709.27, 95% CI, -3582.02 to -1601.16; P < 0.01). On multivariate analysis, wound complications were associated with open fractures (odds ratio 3.36, 95% CI, 1.06-10.69; P = 0.04) and an American Society of Anesthesiologists score >2 (odds ratio 3.68, 95% CI, 1.07-12.67; P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that an acute fixation protocol for high-energy pilon fractures decreases time to definitive fixation, lowers operative costs, and shortens hospital LOS without affecting wound complications or reoperations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Geriatric Distal Femur Fractures Treated With Distal Femoral Replacement Are Associated With Higher Rates of Readmissions and Complications.

OBJECTIVE: Compare mortality and complications of distal femur fracture repair among elderly patients who receive operative fixation versus distal femur replacement (DFR). DESIGN: Retrospective comparison. SETTING: Medicare beneficiaries. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Patients 65 years of age and older with distal femur fracture identified using Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services data from 2016 to 2019. INTERVENTION: Operative fixation (open reduction with plating or intramedullary nail) or DFR. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Mortality, readmissions, perioperative complications, and 90-day cost were compared between groups using Mahalanobis nearest-neighbor matching to account for differences in age, sex, race, and the Charlson Comorbidity Index. RESULTS: Most patients (90%, 28,251/31,380) received operative fixation. Patients in the fixation group were significantly older (81.1 vs. 80.4 years, P < 0.001), and there were more an open fractures (1.6% vs. 0.5%, P < 0.001). There were no differences in 90-day (difference: 1.2% [-0.5% to 3%], P = 0.16), 6-month (difference: 0.6% [-1.5% to 2.7%], P = 0.59), and 1-year mortality (difference: -3.3% [-2.9 to 2.3], P = 0.80). DFR had greater 90-day (difference: 5.4% [2.8%-8.1%], P < 0.001), 6-month (difference: 6.5% [3.1%-9.9%], P < 0.001), and 1-year readmission (difference: 5.5% [2.2-8.7], P = 0.001). DFR had significantly greater rates of infection, pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, and device-related complication within 1 year from surgery. DFR ($57,894) was significantly more expensive than operative fixation ($46,016; P < 0.001) during the total 90-day episode. CONCLUSIONS: Elderly patients with distal femur fracture have a 22.5% 1-year mortality rate. DFR was associated with significantly greater infection, device-related complication, pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, cost, and readmission within 90 days, 6 months, and 1 year of surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Refracture after plate removal of midshaft clavicle fractures after bone union-incidence, risk factors, management and outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: There is a great debate on the routine use of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for midshaft clavicle fractures, and one concern is the adverse events after ORIF, such as implant removal after bone union. In this retrospective study, we assessed the incidence, risk factors, management and outcomes of refracture after plate removal of midshaft clavicle fractures after bone union. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three hundred fifty-two patients diagnosed with acute midshaft clavicle fractures who had complete medical records from primary fractures to refracture were recruited. Details of imaging materials and clinical characteristics were carefully reviewed and analysed. RESULTS: The incidence rate of refracture was 6.5% (23/352), and the average interval from implant removal to refracture was 25.6 days. Multivariate analysis showed that the risk factors were Robinson type-2B2 and fair/poor reduction. Females were 2.4 times more likely to have refracture, although it was not significant in multivariate analysis (p = 0.134). Postmenopausal females with a short interval (≤ 12 months) from primary surgery to implant removal had a significant risk for refracture. Tobacco use and alcohol use during bone healing were potential risk factors for male patients, although they were not significant in multivariate analysis. Ten patients received reoperation with or without bone graft, and they had a higher rate of bone union than 13 patients who refused reoperation. CONCLUSION: The incidence of refracture following implant removal after bone union is underestimated, and severe comminute fractures and unsatisfactory reduction during primary surgery are risk factors. Implant removal for postmenopausal female patients is not recommended due to a high rate of refracture.

Postoperative Chest X-Rays After Open Reduction Internal Fixation of Clavicle Fractures May Not Be Cost-Effective or Necessary.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the use of chest x-rays after open-reduction internal fixation of clavicle fractures. Particularly in detection of acute postoperative pneumothorax and cost-effectiveness of obtaining routine chest x-rays postoperatively. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Level I trauma center. PATIENTS: Two hundred thirty-six patients who underwent ORIF from 2013 to 2020 between the ages of 12 and 93. INTERVENTION: Chest x-ray performed postoperatively. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: Presence of acute postoperative pneumothorax. RESULTS: Of the 236 patients who underwent surgery, 189 (80%) patients received a CXR postoperatively and 7 (3%) patients experienced respiratory symptoms. All patients who had respiratory symptoms received a postoperative CXR. Those who did not receive a CXR postoperatively did not experience any respiratory complications. Two patients in the cohort had a postoperative pneumothorax, which was present preoperatively and unchanged in size postoperatively. Both of these patients were managed with general anesthesia and endotracheal intubation for surgery. The most common finding on CXR postoperatively was atelectasis. The cost of a portable CXR can be upward of $594 when including technology, personnel fees, and radiologic interpretation. CONCLUSION: Postoperative chest x-rays after clavicle open reduction and internal fixation did not detect any acute postoperative pneumothorax in asymptomatic patients. It is not cost-effective to routinely get chest x-rays in patients after open-reduction internal fixation of clavicle fractures. In our study, of the 189 chest x-rays performed, only 7 patients experienced postoperative respiratory symptoms. Our health care system as a total could have saved upward of $108,108 in total for these patients because they may have been considered nonreimbursable by an insurance provider. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

An Acute Fixation Protocol for High-Energy Tibial Plateau Fractures Decreases Time to Fixation and Lowers Operative Costs Without Affecting Wound Complications and Reoperations.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether an acute fixation protocol for high-energy tibial plateau fractures increases the rate of wound complications. DESIGN: Retrospective comparative study. SETTING: Urban level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: One hundred thirty-four patients with high-energy tibial plateau fractures (OTA/AO 41B/C [Schatzker VI/V/VI]) treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). INTERVENTION: Utilization of an acute ORIF (<48 hours) versus delayed ORIF protocol. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Primary outcomes: wound complications (wound dehiscence/necrosis, superficial/deep infections) and reoperations. Secondary outcomes: total operative costs and hospital length of stay. RESULTS: Overall, 83.9% (26/31) of patients received definitive fixation within 48 hours under the acute ORIF protocol versus 18.4% (19/103) of patients treated under the standard delayed protocol with no observed differences in the rate of wound complications (proportional difference (PD) -4.6%, confidence interval (CI) -17.2% to 11.3%; P = 0.78) or reoperations (PD 2.0%, CI, 13.0% to 12.5%; P = 1.00). The acute ORIF protocol lowered operative costs (median difference (MD) $-2.563.00, CI, 3021.00 to -1661.00; P < 0.001) and hospital length of stay (MD 4.0 days, CI, 6.0-1.0; P = 0.001). On multivariate analysis, wound complications were associated with increasing age (odds ratio (OR) 1.05, CI, 1.01-1.10; P = 0.01) and tobacco use (OR 3.75, CI, 1.19-11.82; P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: An acute ORIF protocol for high-energy tibial plateau fractures decreased time to fixation and lowered operative costs without increasing the risk of wound complications or reoperations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

A cost analysis of treating postoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures following hip replacement surgery in a UK tertiary referral centre.

AIM: This study aims to evaluate costs associated with periprosthetic femoral fracture (PFF) treatment at a UK tertiary referral centre. METHODS: This study included 128 consecutive PFFs admitted from 02/04/2014-19/05/2020. Financial data were provided by Patient Level Information and Costing Systems. Primary outcomes were median cost and margin. Secondary outcomes were length of stay, blood transfusion, critical care, 30-day readmission, 2-year local complication, 2-year systemic complication, 2-year reoperation and 30-day mortality rates. Statistical comparisons were made between treatment type. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05. RESULTS: Across the cohort, median cost was £15,644.00 (IQR £11,031.00-£22,255.00) and median loss was £3757.50 (£599.20-£8296.20). The highest costs were ward stay (£3994.00, IQR £1,765.00-£7,013.00), theatre utilisation (£2962.00, IQR £0.00-£4,286.00) and overheads (£1705.10, IQR £896.70-£2432.20). Cost (£17,455.00 [IQR, £13,194.00-£23,308.00] versus £7697.00 [IQR £3871.00-£10,847.00], p<0.001) and loss (£4890.00 [IQR £1308.00-£10,009.00] versus £1882.00 [IQR £313.00-£3851.00], p = 0.02) were greater in the operative versus the nonoperative group. There was no difference in cost (£17,634.00 [IQR £12,965.00-£22,958.00] versus £17,399.00 [IQR £13,394.00-£23,404.00], p = 0.98) or loss (£5374.00 [IQR £1950.00-£10,143.00] versus £3860.00 [IQR -£95.50-£7601.00], p = 0.21) between the open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and revision groups. More patients required blood transfusion in the operative versus the nonoperative group (17 [17.9%] versus 0 [0.0%], p = 0.009). There was no difference in any clinical outcome between the ORIF and revision groups (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: PFF treatment costs are high with inadequate reimbursement from NHS tariff. Work is needed to address this disparity and reduce hospital costs. Cost should not be used to decide between ORIF and revision surgery.

Healthcare resource use and costs related to surgical infections of tibial fractures in a Spanish cohort.

Surgical site infection constitutes a serious complication in the healing process of bone fractures and has been associated with increases in medical resource use and healthcare costs. This study evaluates the economic impact of surgical site infection in tibial fractures in a Spanish cohort. It is a retrospective, single-centre, comparative cohort study of patients with tibial fractures with longitudinal follow-up for up to 18 months post-surgery. Included patients (n = 325) were adults, with tibial fracture, either isolated or polyfracture, or polytrauma with an Injury Severity Score >15. Patients had been surgically treated within 30 days of the tibial fracture by external or internal fixation, or external followed by internal fixation. Most patients (84.9%) had an American Society of Anaesthesiology score of 1-2. 20% of the patients had one open tibial fracture, 12.3% had polytrauma, and 20% had multiple fractures. Most patients were treated with a nail (41.8%) or a plate (33.8%). 56 patients (17.2%) developed surgical site infection. Patients with infection had significantly higher hospital length of stay (34.9 vs 12.0 days; p<0.001; +191%), readmissions (1.21 vs 0.25; p<0.001; +380%) and mean operating theatre time (499 vs 219 min; p<0.001; +128%) than patients without infection. Mean length of stay in intensive care did not significantly increase with infection (2.8 vs 1.7 days; p = 0.25). Total in-hospital costs for patients with infection increased from €7,607 to €17,538 (p<0.001; +131%). Overall, infections were associated with significantly increased healthcare resource use and costs. Preventive strategies to avoid infections could lead to substantial cost savings.

Epidemiology and management of proximal tibia fractures in children and adolescents: a population-based study based on the Kids' Fracture Tool.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Proximal tibial fractures are infrequent injuries in children, and the literature on epidemiology, associated injuries, and management is limited. We calculated a population-based incidence and described the characteristics of proximal tibial fractures in children in terms of complications and management. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study over a 6-year-period during including 241 children with proximal tibial fractures who presented to our university hospital. Demographic and fracture-related data was collected from the Kids' Fracture Tool. The number of children during the study period was collected from statistical yearbooks of the City of Helsinki to estimate annual incidence. RESULTS: Extra-articular fractures (129/241) peaked at the age of 3 and tibial tubercle (42/241) and intra-articular fractures (70/241) peaked at the age of 15. Annual incidences were estimated to be 3.4/100,000 children and 22/100,000 children in the age group of 13-16 years for ACL avulsions, and 3.8/100,000 children and 21/100,000 children in the age group of 13-16 years for tibial tubercle fractures. The incidence of vascular compromise (0%) and compartment syndrome was low (0.4 %, 1/241). CONCLUSION: Proximal tibial fractures present with a bimodal distribution, with extra-articular fractures peaking at the age of 3 years and fractures of the tibial tuberosity and intra-articular fractures peaking at the age of 15 years. Additionally, associated compartment syndrome and vascular compromise was not as common as previously reported.

Effects of Economic Well-Being on Outcomes at One Year after Volar Plate Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures.

Background: The objective of this study was to determine whether economic well-being is associated with patient-reported functional outcomes and range of motion 1 year following volar plate fixation of distal radius fracture. Methods: A retrospective study was performed on 200 patients with distal radius fractures treated with volar plate fixation at two Level 1 trauma centres from 2006 to 2017 with 1-year clinical follow-up using a previously published cohort. The economic well-being of patients was assessed using the Distressed Communities Index (DCI). Our outcome variables were patient-reported functional outcomes assessed by QuickDASH score and wrist and forearm range of motion 1 year after surgery. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) test was used to compare outcome variables across pre-established tiers of economic well-being. Results: The mean QuickDASH score at 1 year following distal radius fracture volar plate fixation was 10.8 and ranged from 7.3 to 12.2 across tiers of economic well-being. QuickDASH score and wrist range of motion were not significantly different across all tiers of economic well-being. However, wrist flexion-extension arc at 1 year following surgery was significantly decreased in the economically at-risk group compared with the remaining cohort. Conclusions: Patient-reported functional outcomes 1 year after volar plate fixation of distal radius fracture are similar across tiers of economic well-being. Economically disadvantaged patients are at risk for poorer wrist motion following distal radius fracture surgery, though it is not clear if this difference is clinically significant. Level of Evidence: Level II (Prognostic).

How Can Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Pay for Itself?-Reducing Complications Is Important.

INTRODUCTION: Orthopaedic trauma demonstrates a relatively high rate of surgical site infections (SSI) as compared with other surgical specialties. SSIs provide significant clinical challenges and create significant health care costs. Incisional negative pressure wound therapy (iNPWT) has reduced the risk of SSI in orthopaedic surgery and other surgical specialties. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to investigate potential cost savings with the use of iNPWT (3M Prevena Therapy, 3M, St. Paul, MN) in high-risk orthopaedic trauma patients with closed OTA/AO 41C and 43C fractures. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study performed at a single, level-1 trauma center using data from a lower extremity fracture registry. Using the results from the registry and baseline infection rates derived from the literature, a health economic model was developed to evaluate the potential cost savings. RESULTS: A total of 79 patients included in the registry underwent open reduction and internal fixation of OTA/AO 41C and 43C fractures. A total of 10.1% developed a SSI. For those who received iNPWT, the rate of SSI was 7.4%. A health economic model suggests that the use of iNPWT may reduce the costs per patient by approximately $1381 to $4436 per patient. CONCLUSIONS: This health economic assessment and model suggests that judicious use of iNPWT may reduce health care costs in patients undergoing open reduction and internal fixation of OTA/AO 41C and 43C fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Economic Level IV.

Cost and safety of inpatient versus outpatient open reduction internal fixation of isolated ankle fractures.

BACKGROUND: As health care shifts to value-based models, one strategy within orthopedics has been to transition appropriate cases to outpatient or ambulatory settings to reduce costs; however, there are limited data on the efficacy and safety of this practice for isolated ankle fractures. The purpose of this study was to compare the cost and safety associated with inpatient versus outpatient ankle open reduction internal fixation (ORIF). METHODS: All patients who underwent ORIF of isolated closed ankle fractures at 2 affiliated hospitals between April 2016 and March 2017 were identified retrospectively. Demographic characteristics, including age, gender, comorbidities and injuryspecific variables, were collected. We grouped patients based on whether they underwent ankle ORIF as an inpatient or outpatient. We determined case costing for all patients and analyzed it using multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 196 patients (125 inpatient, 71 outpatient) were included for analysis. Inpatients had a significantly longer mean length of stay than outpatients (54.3 h [standard deviation (SD) 36.3 h] v. 7.5 h [SD 1.7 h], p < 0.001). The average cost was significantly higher for the inpatient cohort than the outpatient cohort ($4137 [SD $2285] v. $1834 [SD $421], p < 0.001). There were more unimalleolar ankle fractures in the outpatient group than in the inpatient group (42 [59.2%] v. 41 [32.8%], p < 0.001). Outpatients waited longer for surgery than inpatients (9.6 d [SD 5.6 d] v. 2.0 d [SD 3.3 d], p < 0.001). Fourteen patients (11.2%) in the inpatient group presented to the emergency department or were readmitted to hospital within 30 days of discharge, compared to 5 (7.0%) in the outpatient group (p = 0.3). CONCLUSION: In the treatment of isolated closed ankle fractures, outpatient surgery was associated with a significant reduction in length of hospital stay and overall case cost compared to inpatient surgery, with no significant difference in readmission or reoperation rates. In medically appropriate patients, isolated ankle ORIF can be performed safely in an ambulatory setting and is associated with significant cost savings.

Percutaneous osteoplasty in long bones: Current status and assessment of outcomes.

Osteoplasty is a minimally invasive imaging-guided intervention providing mechanical stabilization, bone consolidation and pain relief in oncologic patients presenting with non-osteoblastic bone metastases or with insufficiency fractures. The intervention relies on the injection of an acrylic substance (ie, polymethylmethacrylate; PMMA) into the target bone. PMMA is very resistant to axial compressive loads but much less to bending, torsional and shearing stresses. Accordingly, from a biomechanical standpoint osteoplasty is adapted for the palliative treatment of small painful lytic bone defects located in the epiphyseal region of long bones in patients with clear surgical contraindications; or for increasing the anchoring of the osteosynthesis material into the target bone. Although pain relief is rapid and effective following osteoplasty, secondary fractures have been reported in up to 8-9% of long bone tumors undergoing such intervention; and following such event, fixation with endomedullary osteosynthetic material (eg, nailing) is not practicable any more. Accordingly, careful patients' selection is critical and should happen with a multidisciplinary approach.

Assessment of morbidity and mortality after periprosthetic hip fracture. Influence of Vancouver stage in a retrospective single-centre study of 88 patients.

BACKGROUND: Peri-prosthetic hip fractures (PPHFs) are serious complications whose treatment is generally difficult due to their predominance in elderly patients with bone frailty and other comorbidities. The Vancouver classification is the most widely used and is helpful for assisting treatment decisions. However, its value for predicting morbidity and mortality has not been assessed. The objective of this retrospective study was to assess post-operative morbidity and mortality according to the fracture type in the Vancouver classification. HYPOTHESIS: Post-operative morbidity and mortality vary across fracture types in the Vancouver classification. METHODS: A single-centre retrospective study was conducted from 1st January 2010 to 31st December 2015. All patients who had surgery for a PPHF were included. There were 88 patients, including 66 (75%) females, and mean age was 82 years. The patients were re-evaluated at least 3 years after surgery. The distribution of the fracture types was as follows: Vancouver (V) A, n=7; VB, n=63 (VB1, n=30; VB2, n=23; and VB3, n=10); and VC, n=18. Data on the pre-operative status (self-sufficiency, comorbidities, ASA score, etc.) were extracted from the admission files. Morbidity and mortality were evaluated globally and according to the Vancouver type, using the patient files and telephone calls to determine self-sufficiency scores (Parker, Katz, and Lawton) and functional scores (Merle d'Aubigné-Postel [MAP] score and Harris Hip Score [HHS]). RESULTS: Post-operative medical complications were very common (33 [37.5%] patients) and correlated with the severity of the fracture. Similarly, the mortality rate at last follow-up varied significantly (p<0.05) with the severity of the fracture, as follows: VA, 28.5%; VB1, 40%; VB2, 47.8%; VC, 55.6%; and VB3, 66.7%). In the overall population, loss of self-sufficiency was 20%, 14%, and 26% according to Parker, Katz, and Lawton, respectively; loss of function was 13.9% and 13.3% according to the MAP score and HHS (p<0.05). All the self-sufficiency scores (Parker, Katz, and Lawton) and functional scores (MAP and HHS) decreased post-operatively in proportion to the severity of the fracture (very small losses for VA and greatest losses for VB3) (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: The short- and medium-term mortality rates in our cohort of patients with PPHFs were high and chiefly dependent on the severity of the fractures. The self-sufficiency and functional scores were better in the group with VA fractures than in the groups with VB1, VB2, VB3, and VC fractures. In any case, early weight-bearing is without doubt a key factor in limiting the impact of PPHFs on the functional outcome and on mortality. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, retrospective study.

Tibial Shaft and Pilon Fractures With Associated Syndesmotic Injury: A Matched Cohort Assessment.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the outcomes of pilon and tibial shaft fractures with syndesmotic injuries compared with similar fractures without syndesmotic injury. DESIGN: Retrospective case-control study. SETTING: Level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: All patients over a 5-year period (2012-2017) with tibial shaft or pilon fractures with a concomitant syndesmotic injury and a control group without a syndesmotic injury matched for age, OTA/AO fracture classification, and Gustilo-Anderson open fracture classification. INTERVENTION: Preoperative or intraoperative diagnosis of syndesmotic injury with reduction and fixation of both fracture and syndesmosis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: Rates of deep infection, nonunion, unplanned reoperation, and amputation in patients with a combined syndesmotic injury and tibial shaft or pilon fracture versus those without a syndesmotic injury. RESULTS: A total of 30 patients, including 15 tibial shaft and 15 pilon fractures, were found to have associated syndesmotic injuries. The matched control group comprised 60 patients. The incidence of syndesmotic injury in all tibial shaft fractures was 2.3% and in all pilon fractures was 3.4%. The syndesmotic injury group had more neurologic injuries (23.3% vs. 8.3% P = 0.02), more vascular injuries not requiring repair (30% vs. 15%, P = 0.13), and a higher rate compartment syndrome (6.7% vs. 0%, P = 0.063). Segmental fibula fracture was significantly more common in patients with a syndesmotic injury (36.7% vs. 13.3%, P = 0.04). Fifty percent of the syndesmotic injury group underwent an unplanned reoperation with significantly more unplanned reoperations (50% vs. 27.5%, P = 0.04). The syndesmotic group had a significantly higher deep infection rate (26.7% vs. 8.3% P = 0.047) and higher rate of amputation (26.7% vs. 3.3% P = 0.002) while the nonunion rate was similar (17.4% vs. 16.7% P = 0.85). CONCLUSIONS: Although syndesmotic injuries with tibial shaft or pilon fractures are rare, they are a marker of a potentially limb-threatening injury. Limbs with this combined injury are at increased risk of deep infection, unplanned reoperation, and amputation. The presence of a segmental fibula fracture should raise clinical suspicion to evaluate for syndesmotic injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Implant Charge Differences Between Distal Radius Fixation Constructs (CPT 25607, 25608, and 25609).

BACKGROUND: Implants are a significant contributor to health care costs. We hypothesized that extra-articular fracture patterns would have a lower implant charge than intra-articular fractures and aimed to determine risk factors for increased cost. METHODS: In total, 163 patients undergoing outpatient distal radius fracture fixation at 2 hospitals were retrospectively reviewed stratified by Current Procedural Terminology codes. Implants and associated charges were noted, as were sex, age, insurance status, surgeon specialty, and location. Bivariate and multivariable regression were used to determine associations. RESULTS: Total implant charges were significantly lower for 25607 (extraarticular, $3,348) than 25608 (2-part intraarticular, $3,859) and 25609 (3+ part intraarticular, $3,991). In addition, intra-articular fractures had higher charges for distal screws/pegs and bone graft. Charge was lower when surgery was performed at a trauma center. There was no charge difference associated with insurance status, age, sex, hand surgery specialty, or fellow status. Substantial intersurgeon variation existed in all fracture types. CONCLUSION: Distal radius fractures may represent a good model for examining implant costs. Extra-articular fractures had lower implant charges than intra-articular fractures. These data may be used to help construct pricing for distal radius fracture bundles and potential cost savings.

Tibial plateau fractures in Belgium: epidemiology, financial burden and costs curbing strategies.

PURPOSE: We describe the incidence of tibial plateau fractures and the evolution of its management and financial burden in Belgium, perform a similar audit at University Hospitals Leuven, and define strategies to curb the increasing cost. METHODS: National data on tibial plateau fractures were collected from the NIHDI and compared to our performance. Several clinical parameters, such as age, sex, treatment modality and length-of-stay, were included. The total healthcare costs are considered as the sum of hospitalization costs and ambulatory care costs. RESULTS: Between 2006 and 2018, a total number of 35,226 tibial plateau fractures were diagnosed in Belgium and 861 at our center. The incidence increased 41% over time (mean 25/100,000 persons per year). The mean rate of surgery in Belgium was 37% and slightly decreased over time, due to a larger increase of non-operatively treated tibial plateau fractures. The rate of surgery at the UHL was 49%. Surprisingly, the average cost per patient was equal for operatively and non-operatively treated patients in Belgium, and driven by the length-of stay. CONCLUSION: Since length-of-stay is the main driver of the total healthcare costs of tibial plateau fractures, guidelines on appropriate length-of-stay can help to decrease variability and curb the total healthcare costs, particularly of the non-operatively treated patients. Our performance was in line with this. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.