Epidemiology and treatment of proximal femoral fractures in the elderly U.S. population.

Proximal femoral fractures are a serious complication, especially for elderly patients. Detailed epidemiological analyzes provide a valuable resource for stakeholders in the health care system in order to foresee future development possibly influenceable by adaption of therapeutic procedures and prevention strategies. This work aimed at answering the following research questions: (1) What are the incidence rates of proximal femoral fractures in the elderly U.S. population? (2) What is the preferred treatment procedure for these fractures? Proximal femoral fractures occurred between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2019 in patients ≥ 65 years were identified from the Medicare Physician Service Records Data Base. The 5% sample of Medicare beneficiaries, equivalent to the records from approximately 2.5 million enrollees formed the basis of this study. Fractures were grouped into head/neck, intertrochanteric, and subtrochanteric fractures. The overall incidence rate, age and sex specific incidence rates as well as incidence rate ratios were calculated. Common Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes were used to identify procedures and operations. In 2019, a total number of 7982 femoral head/neck fractures was recorded. In comparison to 9588 cases in 2009, the incidence substantially decreased by 26.6% from 666.7/100,000 inhabitants to 489.3/100,000 inhabitants (z = - 5.197, p < 0.001). Also, in intertrochanteric fractures, a significant decline in the incidence by 17.3% was evident over the years from 367.7/100,000 inhabitants in 2009 to 304.0 cases per 100,000 inhabitants in 2019 (z = - 2.454, p = 0.014). A similar picture was observable for subtrochanteric fractures, which decreased by 29.6% (51.0 cases per 100,000 to 35.9 cases per 100,000) over the time period (z = - 1.612, p = 0.107). Head/neck fractures were mainly treated with an arthroplasty (n = 36,301, 40.0%). The majority of intertrochanteric fractures and subtrochanteric fractures received treatment with an intramedullary device (n = 34,630, 65.5% and n = 5870, 77.1%, respectively). The analysis indicated that the incidence of all types of proximal femoral neck fractures decreased for the population of elderly patients in the U.S. within the last decade. Treatment of head and neck fractures was mainly conducted through arthroplasty, while intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures predominantly received an intramedullary nailing.

Mortality and morbidity following operative management of tibial shaft fractures in octogenarians.

PURPOSE: As the geriatric population continues to grow, the incidence of tibial shaft fractures in octogenarians is projected to increase. There is significant variation in the functional and physiologic status within the geriatric population. The purpose of this study is to compare the complications following operative treatment of tibial shaft fractures for patients who are 65- to79-year-old compared to patients who are 80- to 89-year-old. METHODS: Data were collected through the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database for the years 2007-2018. All isolated tibial shaft fractures that were treated with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) or intramedullary nail (IMN) were identified. Patients were divided into a 65- to 79-year-old group and an 80-to 89-year-old group. Primary and secondary outcomes were studied and included 30-day mortality. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed with a significance set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: In total, 434 patients with tibial shaft fractures were included in the study. Of these, 333 were 65- to 79-year-old and 101 were 80- to 89-year-old (Table 1). On multivariate analysis, there was no significant difference in complication rates between the two cohorts. CONCLUSION: After controlling for demographics and comorbidities, age was not independently associated with 30-day mortality or any other peri-operative complications between patients aged 80 to 89 and patients aged 65 to 79 following operative management of tibial shaft fractures. In appropriately selected octogenarian patients, operative management of tibial shaft fractures represents a relatively safe treatment modality that may promote early rehabilitation.

Quality of life of children during distraction osteogenesis: a comparison between intramedullary magnetic lengthening nails and external fixators.

BACKGROUND: Distraction osteogenesis is a very demanding process. For decades, external fixation was the only reliable option for gradual deformity correction. Recently, intramedullary magnetic nails have gained popularity. This research aimed to assess the quality of life in children during gradual deformity correction using intramedullary lengthening nails compared to external fixation. METHOD: Prospective analysis included children who had gradual lower limb deformity correction between 2017 and 2019. Group A included children who had magnetic lengthening nails; patients in group B had external fixation devices. Child health utility 9D (CHU- 9D) and EuroQol 5D youth (EQ- 5D-Y) were used to measure the quality of life at fixed points during the distraction osteogenesis process. The results were used to calculate the utility at each milestone and the overall quality of life adjusted years (QALYs). RESULTS: Thirty-four children were recruited, group A had 16 patients, whilst group B had 18 patients. The average ages were 16.0 years and 14.7 years for groups A and B, respectively. Group A patients reported significantly better utility compared to group B. This was observed during all stages of treatment (P = 0.00016). QALYs were better for group A (0.44) compared to group B (0.34) (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The quality of life was generally better in group A compared to group B. In most patients, the health utility progressively improved throughout treatment. In the same way, QALYs were better with the lengthening nails compared to external fixators. The magnetic lengthening devices (PRECICE nails) which were used in this research were recently relabelled to restrict their applications in children; this study was conducted before these restrictions.

Management of post-traumatic femoral defects with a monorail external fixator over an intramedullary nail.

PURPOSE: The management of limb-length discrepancy secondary to traumatic femoral bone loss poses a unique challenge for surgeons. The Ilizarov technique is popular, but is associated with long external fixator time and many complications. This retrospective study assessed outcomes of post-traumatic femoral defects managed by monorail external fixation over an intramedullary nail. METHODS: Eight patients were included from October 2015 to May 2019 with post-traumatic femoral defects that underwent treatment with monorail fixator-assisted intramedullary nailing. Primary outcome was time to bone union and bone results according to ASAMI classification. Secondary outcomes were lengthening index, consolidation time and index, external fixator index (EFI), time to partial weight bearing(PWB) and full weight bearing (FWB), and complications. Patient reported outcome measures including EQ-5D-5L, SF-36, Oxford knee scores (OKS), and Oxford hip scores (OHS) were recorded after recovery. RESULTS: Mean follow-up time was 227 weeks. Average bone defect size was 9.69 cm. Average consolidation time and index were 11.35 months and 1.24 months/cm, respectively. Mean lengthening and external fixator index were 20.2 days/cm and 23.88 days/cm, respectively. On average, patients achieved FWB and bone union 56.25 weeks and 68.83 weeks after bone transport initiation, respectively. Two patients had docking site non-union, five patients had pin site infections, and two patients had osteomyelitis. EQ-5D-5L and EQ-VAS scores were compared to UK population norms (p = 0.104, p = 0.238, respectively). Average OKS was 32.17 and OHS was 34.00. CONCLUSION: Monorail external fixation over an intramedullary nail is an effective option for post-traumatic femoral defects, reducing external fixator time and returning patients' quality of life to a level comparable with the normal population.

Outcomes and Cost Comparison Between Generic and Conventional Cephalomedullary Nails in the Treatment of Peritrochanteric Femur Fractures.

INTRODUCTION: Although generic orthopaedic implants have been available for several years, there has been slow adoption of this cost-saving option. We hypothesize equivalent outcomes between generic and conventional cephalomedullary nails (CMN) in the treatment of peritrochanteric femur fractures. METHODS: We evaluated 419 patients undergoing CMN for peritrochanteric femur fracture with a minimum 6-month follow-up. Demographic data, radiographic assessment, and clinical outcomes were compared. RESULTS: Ninety patients were treated with generic implants and 329 patients with conventional implants. The overall complication rate was 7.0%, with a revision surgery rate of 5.4%. No significant differences were seen in demographic variables or surgical factors. Although there was an increased incidence of postoperative infections with conventional nails (P = 0.045), no significant differences were seen in other complications. CONCLUSION: At our institution, generic nails cost approximately 38% less than their conventional counterparts. There seems to be no increased rate of implant-associated complications with the use of generic CMNs, although allowing for notable cost savings.

What Are the Potential Benefits and Risks of Using Magnetically Driven Antegrade Intramedullary Lengthening Nails for Femoral Lengthening to Treat Leg Length Discrepancy?

BACKGROUND: Limb lengthening with magnetically driven intramedullary lengthening nails is a fast-developing field and represents an alternative to external fixators. Although previous studies have assessed the application of magnetically driven intramedullary lengthening nails, these studies have been heterogenous regarding the nailing approach, the bone treated, and the implant type; they also have analyzed relatively small patient groups at short follow-up durations. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Is femoral lengthening with magnetically driven antegrade intramedullary lengthening nails accurate and precise? (2) What are the most common complications of treatment? (3) What factors are associated with unplanned additional surgery? METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the longitudinally maintained database of our orthopaedic teaching hospital to identify all patients who underwent surgery for leg length discrepancy (LLD) between October 2014 and April 2019. In total, we surgically treated 323 patients for LLD of 2 cm or more. Of those 55% (177 of 323) were treated with distraction osteogenesis with magnetically driven intramedullary lengthening nails, 18% (59 of 323) with external fixation, and 27% (87 of 323) with epiphysiodesis around the knee. Based on that, 29% (93 of 323) of patients underwent unilateral femoral distraction osteogenesis with magnetically driven antegrade femoral lengthening nails and were eligible for analysis. No patient was excluded, and 3% (3 of 93) were lost before the minimum study follow-up of 2 years, leaving 97% (90 of 93) for analysis. Patients with a distal femoral deformity were treated via a retrograde femoral approach (10% [33 of 323]) or with external fixators (3% [10 of 323]) and were not included in this study. Distraction osteogenesis with magnetically driven intramedullary lengthening nails was not considered for patients with deep tissue infection, those with bone dimensions considered to be too small in relation to the available implants, and for patients younger than 8 years. This study included 90 patients (44 females, 43 left femora) treated for a median (interquartile range) preoperative LLD of 39 mm (32 to 52) at a median age of 15 years (14 to 17). The same limb lengthening system was applied in all patients. The median (IQR) follow-up was 35 months (24 to 78). Data were acquired through a chart review performed by someone not involved in the surgical care of the included patients. Data acquisition was supervised and curated by two of the involved surgeons. Accuracy was calculated as 100 - [(achieved distraction in mm - planned distraction in mm) / (planned distraction in mm) x 100] and precision as 100 - (relative standard deviation of accuracy). Treatment-associated complications were summarized descriptively and characterized as complications resulting in unplanned additional surgery or those not resulting in unplanned surgery. To analyze the risk of unplanned additional surgery by entity, we calculated odds ratios (ORs) comparing the incidence of unplanned additional surgery in the different entity cohorts with the idiopathic LLD cohort as a reference. By calculating ORs, we analyzed the risk for unplanned additional surgery depending on sex, age, surgery time, and previous lengthening. Due to the lack of long-term evidence about motorized lengthening nails remaining in situ and concerns about potential implant-related adverse effects, removal was routinely scheduled 1 year after consolidation. For implant removal, 92% (83 of 90) of patients underwent planned additional surgery, which was not recorded as an adverse event of the treatment. Ninety-seven percent (87 of 90) of patients completed lengthening with the implant remaining in situ until the end of distraction. The median (IQR) distraction length was 37 mm (30 to 45) with a median distraction index of 0.9 mm/day (0.7 to 1.0) and median consolidation index of 31 days/cm (25 to 42). RESULTS: The calculated accuracy and precision were 94% and 90%, respectively. In total, 76% (68 of 90) of our patients experienced complications, which resulted in 20% (18 of 90) of patients undergoing unplanned additional surgery. The most common complication overall was adjustment of the distraction rate in 27% (24 of 90) of patients (faster: 16% [14 of 90]; slower: 11% [10 of 90]) and temporary restriction of knee motion, which occurred in 20% (18 of 90) of our patients and resolved in all patients who experienced it. The most serious complications were bacterial osteomyelitis and knee subluxation, which occurred in 3% (3 of 90) and 1% (1 of 90) of our patients, respectively. With the numbers available, we found only one factor associated with an increased likelihood of unplanned additional surgery: Patients with postinfectious LLD had higher odds of unplanned additional surgery than patients with idiopathic LLD (7% [1 of 15] versus 50% [3 of 6], OR 14.0 [95% CI 1.06 to 185.49]; p = 0.02). However, we caution readers this finding is fragile, and the confidence interval suggests that the effect size estimate is likely to be imprecise. CONCLUSION: Femoral distraction osteogenesis with magnetically driven antegrade intramedullary lengthening nails appears to be an accurate and reliable treatment for femoral lengthening. However, depending on the etiology, a high risk of unplanned additional surgery should be anticipated, and a high proportion of patients will experience temporary joint stiffness. We recommend close orthopaedic follow-up and physiotherapy during treatment. This treatment of LLD can be considered alongside other nails, external fixators, and epiphysiodesis. Multicenter studies comparing this with other approaches are needed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study.

Trend and Economic Implications of Implant Selection in the Treatment of Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures: A Review of the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Database From 2007 to 2017.

INTRODUCTION: Intertrochanteric (IT) fractures are estimated to burden the healthcare system six billion dollars annually. Previous studies have documented a trend of early-career orthopaedic surgeons favoring intramedullary nails (IMNs) for these fractures, despite multiple randomized controlled trials demonstrating no evidence for improved patient outcomes when compared with sliding hip screws (SHSs). The purpose of this study was to report the trend of implant utilization for IT fracture fixation from 2007 to 2017. METHODS: The American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery (ABOS) Part II (oral) database was used to identify IT fractures (International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision, code 820.21 or 820.31, and 10th revision, code S72.14) over a 10-year period (2007 to 2017). The cases were categorized by IMN or SHS fixation by surgeon-reported Current Procedural Terminology codes. Utilization of the devices was analyzed according to year, and the implants were compared for outcomes, complications, and cost. RESULTS: As of 2017, 92.4% of IT fractures were being fixed through IMN, representing a 49.1% increase in the number of IMN devices used during the course of this study. SHS had significantly lower medical complication rate (21.3%) and readmittance rate (4.0%) compared with the IMN (medical complication: 26.9%; P < 0.01) (readmittance rate: 5.4%; P = 0.02). SHS also had significantly lower rates of anemia (5.2%) and patient expiration (4.8%) compared with IMN (anemia: 10.2%; P < 0.01) (patient expiration: 6.1%; P = 0.01). Overall surgical complication rates, reoperative rates, and anesthetic complications did not differ between constructs. A cost differential of $671,812 was found from the 2007-projected distribution, which rose to $3,911,211.00 across the entire 11-year duration of the study for the population. DISCUSSION: Early-career orthopaedic surgeons continue to use a more expensive implant for IT fractures despite limited evidence for improved outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III; Retrospective Cohort Study.

The risk assessment model of fracture nonunion after intramedullary nailing for subtrochanteric femur fracture.

ABSTRACT: To investigate the influencing factors of fracture nonunion after intramedullary nailing for subtrochanteric fractures and to construct a risk assessment model.Based on the multicenter retrospective analysis of 251 patients, all patients were divided into modeling group and verification group. In the modeling group, postoperative fracture nonunion rate, general data, fracture-related factors, surgical reduction-related factors, mechanical and biological factors were calculated, and the influencing factors of fracture nonunion were screened by univariate analysis. Logistic regression model was used for multifactor analysis to construct the risk assessment model. Based on the logistic regression model, the risk prediction model was constructed by drawing the Nomogram diagram. Through the verification group, the influencing factors were evaluated again, and the differentiation and calibration of the model were evaluated. The calibration degree was evaluated by Hosmer-Lemeshow test, goodness of fit test, and calibration curve. The discriminant degree was evaluated by the receiver operating characteristic curve.Fracture nonunion occurred in 34 of 149 patients in the modeling group. Among the 14 potential influencing factors, univariate analysis and logistic regression analysis showed that postoperative hip varus, intramedullary nail fixation failure, and reduction of fracture with large incision were the risk factors of fracture nonunion. The medial cortex fracture was seen reduced on X-Ray was a protective factor for fracture nonunion, and a regression equation was established. Based on the logistic regression model, the Nomogram diagram is drawn. Twenty-four cases of fracture nonunion occurred in the verification group. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was area under curve =0.883 > 0.7, indicating that there was a moderate differentiation to evaluate the occurrence of fracture nonunion after operation. The goodness of fit test: the Hosmers-Lemeshow test (X2 = 2.921, P = .712 > .05) showed that the model had a good calibration.After intramedullary nailing of subtrochanteric fracture, hip varus, failure of intramedullary nail fixation and wide surgical dissection are the risk factors of fracture nonunion, and the postoperative reduction of medial cortex fracture is protective factor.National key research and development projects: 2016YFC0105806.

EOS stereographic assessment of femoral shaft malunion after intramedullary nailing. A prospective series of 48 patients at 9 months' follow-up.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the present study was to assess femoral shaft malunion following anterograde intramedullary nailing, using low-dose EOS stereoradiography. The study hypothesis was that our surgical technique is associated with radiological rotation disorder rates equivalent to those reported in the literature. METHODS: All patients with unilateral femoral shaft fracture treated by anterograde nailing between January 2014 and December 2016 and followed up in our structure were included in a single-center prospective study. The main endpoint was≥15° transverse malrotation compared to the contralateral side as measured on EOS stereoradiography. Correlations between malrotation and Harris Hip and SF12 functional scores were assessed, as were risk factors for onset of shaft malunion in rotation. Forty-eight patients with a mean age of 31.4 years were analyzed at a mean 9.3 months' follow-up. RESULTS: Stereoradiographic malrotation was found in 29.2% of patients. Mean anteversion was 18.5±13.8°. In 2.1% of patients, symptomatic rotation disorder required revision surgery. No correlations emerged between transverse malrotation and functional scores (p>0.05). Risk factors for malrotation comprised multi-site fracture (p=0.04), surgeon's inexperience (p=0.04), and open reduction (p=0.01). CONCLUSION: The present radiologic malrotation rate was comparable to those reported in the literature, using the EOS stereoradiographic system, which provides precise assessment of rotation disorder following closed nailing of femoral shaft fracture. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III; prospective study without control group.

Smoking, Obesity, and Disability Benefits or Litigation Are Not Associated with Clinically Important Reductions in Physical Functioning After Intramedullary Nailing of Tibial Shaft Fractures: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Forty percent of long bone fractures involve the tibia. These fractures are associated with prolonged recovery and may adversely affect patients' long-term physical functioning; however, there is limited evidence to inform what factors influence functional recovery in this patient population. QUESTION/PURPOSE: In a secondary analysis of a previous randomized trial, we asked: What fracture-related, demographic, social, or rehabilitative factors were associated with physical function 1 year after reamed intramedullary nailing of open or closed tibial shaft fractures? METHODS: This is a secondary (retrospective) analysis of a prior randomized trial (Trial to Re-evaluate Ultrasound in the Treatment of Tibial Fractures; TRUST trial). In the TRUST trial, 501 patients with unilateral open or closed tibial shaft fractures were randomized to self-administer daily low-intensity pulsed ultrasound or use a sham device, of which 15% (73 of 501) were not followed for 1 year due to early study termination as a result of futility (no difference between active and sham interventions). Of the remaining patients, 70% (299 of 428) provided full data. All fractures were fixed using reamed (298 of 299) or unreamed (1 of 299) intramedullary nailing. Thus, we excluded the sole fracture fixed using unreamed intramedullary nailing. The co-primary study outcomes of the TRUST trial were time to radiographic healing and SF-36 physical component summary (SF-36 PCS) scores at 1-year. SF-36 PCS scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores being better, and the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) is 5 points. In this secondary analysis, based on clinical and biological rationale, we selected factors that may be associated with physical functioning as measured by SF-36 PCS scores. All selected factors were inserted simultaneously into a multivariate linear regression analysis. RESULTS: After adjusting for potentially confounding factors, such as age, gender, and injury severity, we found that no factor showed an association that exceeded the MCID for physical functioning 1 year after intramedullary nailing for tibial shaft fractures. The independent variables associated with lower physical functioning were current smoking status (mean difference -3.0 [95% confidence interval -5 to -0.5]; p = 0.02), BMI > 30 kg/m2 (mean difference -3.0 [95% CI -5.0 to -0.3]; p = 0.03), and receipt of disability benefits or involvement in litigation, or plans to be (mean difference -3.0 [95% CI -5.0 to -1]; p = 0.007). Patients who were employed (mean difference 4.6 [95% CI 2.0 to 7]; p < 0.001) and those who were advised by their surgeon to partially or fully bear weight postoperatively (mean difference 2.0 [95% CI 0.1 to 4.0]; p = 0.04) were associated with higher physical functioning. Age, gender, fracture severity, and receipt of early physical therapy were not associated with physical functioning at 1-year following surgical fixation. CONCLUSION: Among patients with tibial fractures, none of the factors we analyzed, including smoking status, receipt of disability benefits or involvement in litigation, or BMI, showed an association with physical functioning that exceeded the MCID. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

The economic burden of infections following intramedullary nailing for a tibial shaft fracture in England.

OBJECTIVES: Determine the impact of infections on direct costs and healthcare resource use in England for patients undergoing intramedullary nailing (IMN) for tibial shaft fractures. DESIGN: Non-concurrent cohort based on retrospectively collected data with 2-year follow-up. SETTING: England. PARTICIPANTS: The study population included adult patients (≥18 years) in England with a diagnosis of tibial shaft fracture (International Classification of Diseases-10, S822) in the inpatient setting between May 2003 and June 2017 followed by a procedure for IMN for tibial shaft fracture within 30 days. Patient data were derived from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink linked to National Health Service Hospital Episode Statistics datasets. PRIMARY INDEPENDENT VARIABLE: Infection. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was total inpatient costs from index stay admission through 1 year of follow-up. Secondary outcome included cumulative total healthcare costs, and resource utilisation at 30 days, 90 days, 1 year and 2 years. RESULTS: Overall, 805 patients met the inclusion criteria. At index inpatient stay, 3.7% had a post-IMN infection, rising to 11.7% at 1 year. One-year inpatient costs were 80% higher for patients with infection (p<0.001). Total costs were estimated to be £14 756 (95% CI £13 123 to £16 593) for patients with infection versus £8279 (95% CI £7946 to £8626). Length of stay (LOS), readmission and reoperation were the key drivers of healthcare costs (all p<0.001). After adjustment, LOS was higher by 109% (95% CI 62% to 169%), from 10.5 days to 21.9 days, for patients with infection. The odds of being readmitted or requiring reoperation were higher by 5.18 times (95% CI 3.01 to 9.13) and 2.47 times (95% CI 1.48 to 4.09), respectively, for patients with infection versus those without infection. CONCLUSIONS: Post-IMN infection significantly increases inpatient costs, LOS, readmissions and reoperations associated with tibial fracture fixation. Healthcare burden could be reduced through novel surgical site infection prevention strategies.

Intraoperative assessment of reduction quality during nail fixation of intertrochanteric fractures.

BACKGROUND: The quality of intertrochanteric fracture reduction has traditionally been evaluated using simple radiographs. However, subjective intraoperative evaluation and efforts to achieve a perfect reduction are essential for optimal outcomes. This study aimed to establish criteria for the intraoperative assessment of the quality of intertrochanteric fracture reduction and also analyzed postoperative outcomes in terms of reduction quality. METHODS: This study included 106 patients who received cephalo-medullary nailing for the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures between March 2012 and May 2016 and were followed-up for at least 1 year. An image intensifier was used intraoperatively to evaluate reduction quality by examining the restoration of anteromedial cortex continuity, and neck-shaft angle and anteversion. Based on the reduction quality, the patients were classified into optimal, acceptable, and unacceptable groups, with intervention provided for the unacceptable group. The need for revision surgery and the degree of blade sliding were assessed, and postoperative outcomes related to implant position were analyzed. RESULTS: Over 50% of patients with Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) type 31A2 and A3 fractures were assigned to the unacceptable group after closed reduction (P = 0.006), and 60 cases required additional reduction. Approximately 40% of cases classified as clinically unacceptable required revision, and the rate of sliding was ≥2-fold higher in the unacceptable group than those in the optimal and acceptable groups (P = 0.015), with an average excessive sliding of 9.85 mm. Regarding implant position, cut-out or penetration were observed in cases with superiorly-located blades (P = 0.039). CONCLUSIONS: Good outcomes cannot be achieved with traction alone for femoral intertrochanteric fractures. Active management is required because accurate anteromedial cortex reduction, and restoration of neck-shaft angle and anteversion are essential in femoral intertrochanteric fractures.

Reoperations in intramedullary fixation of pertrochanteric hip fractures.

Objective: This study evaluated the frequency of reoperation within 1 year of initial intramedullary fixation for patients with pertrochanteric hip fracture and compared 1-year healthcare resource utilization and cost burden for patients with and without reoperation. Methods: This is a retrospective evaluation of medical claims from the US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Standard Analytic File. Patients aged ≥65 years who underwent fixation with an intramedullary implant for a pertrochanteric fracture between 2013 and 2015 were included. Healthcare resources that were evaluated included skilled nursing facility (SNF), inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF), readmissions, and outpatient hospital visits. All-cause payments for these services comprised overall cost burden. Generalized Linear Models were used to evaluate healthcare resources and cost burden over 1-year post-surgery and to adjust for confounding between patients with and without a reoperation. Results: A total of 6,423 Medicare patients were included in the analysis. Mean (SD) age was 82.4 (7.8) years, 76.0% were female, and 93.3% were white. A second hip surgery within 1 year after the index fixation procedure was performed in 414 patients (6.4%): 121 (29.2%) contralateral, 115 (27.8%) ipsilateral, and 178 (43.0%) without specified laterality. After adjusting for confounding factors, Medicare patients with ipsilateral reoperations had statistically significantly higher readmissions (100% vs 32.5%, p < 0.0001), outpatient hospital visits (96.4% vs 88.8%, p = 0.018), admissions to a SNF (88.5% vs 80.4%, p = 0.024), and admissions to an IRF (38.8% vs 22.0%, p < 0.0001) compared to patients without reoperations. The adjusted mean total all-cause payments ($90,162 vs $55,131, p < 0.0001) during the 1-year follow-up were statistically significantly higher among patients with reoperations as compared to patients without reoperations. Conclusions: Patients who require a second hip surgery after initial fixation with an intramedullary implant for pertrochanteric hip fractures have significantly higher 1-year healthcare resource utilization and 63.5% higher costs than patients without reoperation.

Digital Assessment of the Implantation Angle of Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation Helical Blade Using CT Three-dimensional Reconstruction.

OBJECTIVES: To facilitate simple and safe manipulation during proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) operation, we studied the range of safe implantation angle of the helical blade of the PFNA system by using a digital-based three-dimensional reconstruction model of CT images. METHODS: Thirty-five healthy volunteers were recruited. Original multilayer helical CT scan data of the left femur were collected and imported into Mimics software. Anatomic features of the femur, including the safe implantation angle, anterior and posterior angle, were measured. Differences in each angle between male and female subjects were compared using Student's t test, and the determinants of each angle were analyzed by linear regression. RESULTS: The mean safe implantation angle was 30.09° ± 4.73°, the mean anterior angle was 15.82° ± 2.07°, and the mean posterior angle was 14.27° ± 3.19°. All the three angles were greater in males than females (P < 0.05). Neck shaft angle and the diameter of the femoral neck and head were linearly correlated with the safe implantation angle, the anterior and posterior angle, respectively. Femoral neck diameter was a significant determinant of the safe implantation angle and posterior angle, respectively. Moreover, femoral neck diameter and femoral head diameter were significant determinants of the anterior angle. CONCLUSIONS: The study has introduced and delineated a novel parameter, the safe implantation angle, for FPNA surgery, which may help orthopedic surgeons in deciding a safe range of PFNA operation and improve the accuracy of PFNA helical blade implantation.

Bilateral Low-Dose Computed Tomography Assessment for Post-Operative Rotational Malalignment After Intramedullary Nailing for Tibial Shaft Fractures: Reliability of a Practical Imaging Technique.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the intra- and inter-observer reliability of low-dose protocolled bilateral postoperative Computed Tomography (CT)-assessment of rotational malalignment after intramedullary nailing (IMN) of tibial shaft fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 156 patients were prospectively included with tibial shaft fractures that were treated with IMN in a Level-I Trauma Centre. All patients underwent post-operative bilateral low-dose CT-assessment (effective dose of 0.03784 - 0.05768 mGy) as per hospital protocol. Four observers performed the validated reproducible measurements of tibial torsion in degrees, based on standardized techniques. The Intra-Class Coefficient (ICC) was calculated to evaluate intra- and inter-observer reliability. The intra- and inter-observer reliability was categorized according to Landis and Koch. RESULTS: Intra-observer reliability for quantification of rotational malalignment on post-operative CT after IMN of tibial shaft fractures was excellent with 0.95 (95% CI = 0.92-0.97). The overall inter-observer reliability was 0.90 (95% CI = 0.87-0.92), also excellent according Landis and Koch. CONCLUSION: Firstly, bilateral post-operative low-dose -similar radiation exposure as plain chest radiographs- CT assessment of tibial rotational alignment is a reliable diagnostic imaging modality to assess rotational malalignment in patients following IMN of tibial shaft fractures and it allows for early revision surgery. Secondly, it may contribute to our understanding of the incidence-, predictors- and clinical relevance of post-operative tibial rotational malalignment in patients treated with IMN for a tibial shaft fracture, and facilitates future studies on this topic.

Intramedullary nails in the treatment of the distal radius fractures.

The distal radius fracture is a common injury in old persons. Its treatment remains a critical challenge because of number of cases, the final cost of the procedure, the level of X-ray irradiation, and the demand of technique of fixation in osteoporotic bone. The entire closed procedure requires a strict percutaneous nailing. This offers advantages in terms of postoperative pain, per-operative irradiation, and cost. The main problem was so far the ability to insure a stable reduction in time. This point is discussed with the introduction of the "Nail-o-Flex®" nail. A continuous series of 83 patients is introduced.

Functional assessment of transplantar nailing for ankle fracture in the elderly: 48 weeks' prospective follow-up of 14 patients.

INTRODUCTION: Retrograde transplantar intramedullary nailing (TIMN) is a recently described option for ankle fracture in elderly patients with multiple comorbidity contraindicating classical internal fixation. The main objective of the present study was to assess mobility after TIMN for ankle fracture in the elderly. The secondary objective was to assess complications. HYPOTHESIS: Retrograde TIMN provides reliable fixation of ankle fracture in the elderly, enabling early resumption of walking. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fourteen patients, with a mean age of 79.6years (range: 65-99years), with fracture of the ankle or tibial pilon treated by retrograde TIMN, were prospectively included over a 1-year period (2014-2016). Full weight-bearing with walking cast boot was authorized as of day 1. Mobility was assessed on Parker score in consultation at 6, 12, 24 and 48 weeks. RESULTS: Ten patients were followed up. Mean Parker score was 3.6 (range: 1-5) preoperatively, and 2.4 (range: 1-5) and 2.7 (range: 1-5) at 24 and 48 weeks, respectively: i.e., not significantly different from preoperative values (p=0.057 and p=0.054, respectively). There were no decubitus-related complications. Two patients (20%) showed other complications, including 1 deep infection requiring material ablation. Consolidation was systematic, without hindfoot malunion. DISCUSSION: Retrograde TIMN appeared to be a useful option for ankle fracture in elderly patients for whom classical internal fixation was contraindicated. It allowed immediate resumption of weight-bearing and early rehabilitation, with no increased morbidity or mortality. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.