Notificações de incidentes no espaço hospitalar: criação de um sistema de notificação interno online em hospital público federal / Incident notifications in the hospital space: creation of an online internal notification system in a federal public hospital

Introdução: O processo de notificação visa monitorar a ocorrência de incidentes para melhor compreensão e desenvolvimento de estratégias de prevenção e redução de danos, assim como promover a melhoria contínua da qualidade e segurança do cuidado prestado. O presente estudo teve como meta a estruturação de três produtos, a saber: Produto 1 ­ Produto bibliográfico técnico e tecnológico intitulado "Caracterização dos incidentes em um hospital público federal entre os anos 2014 a 2019"; Produto 2 ­ Produto bibliográfico técnico e tecnológico intitulado "Criação de sistema interno online para notificação de incidentes no espaço hospitalar: relato de experiência". Produto 3 ­ Produção técnica intitulada "Guia orientador para o preenchimento adequado dos dados no sistema interno online para notificação de incidentes". Objetivo: Criar um sistema interno online para monitoramento dos incidentes em um hospital federal, a partir do FormSUS, bem como organizar um guia orientador para a sua utilização para auxiliar os profissionais no processo de notificações. Materiais e Métodos: O primeiro produto foi um estudo transversal após pesquisa em base de dados secundários de acesso restrito referente ao período de 2014 a 2019, que identificou 10.837 incidentes classificados segundo as Metas Internacionais de Segurança do Paciente: Eventos Adversos, Incidentes sem Dano, Quase Falhas, Circunstâncias Notificáveis. O sistema de notificação foi construído por meio da plataforma do Departamento de Informática do Sistema Único de Saúde para criação de formulários públicos, conhecida como FormSUS versão 3.0. O instrumento já é existente no Ministério da Saúde com base na interface do FormSUS organizado a partir de dados, tais como: dados da internação, data da ocorrência do incidente, descrição completa do incidente, identificação do profissional notificador, contato por e-mail, telefone ou presencial, cargo e função do profissional notificador. Resultados: Finalmente, foi estruturado um guia orientador para preenchimento das notificações de forma simples, baseado em dúvidas mais frequentes, no qual se explicam detalhadamente os incidentes e a forma de acessar o sistema interno online de notificação para o envio ao Núcleo de Segurança do Paciente. Conclusões: Caracterizar e analisar os dados relacionados aos incidentes ocorridos no hospital é um exercício fundamental, pois auxilia o processo de educação contínua sobre segurança do paciente. A partir desse conhecimento, a criação de um sistema online de notificação, e do manual para o preenchimento correto dos formulários, pode contribuir para aumentar a adesão dos profissionais às notificações e trazer informações fidedignas para o desenvolvimento de estratégias que reduzam os danos ao paciente

Introduction: The notification process aims to monitor the occurrence of incidents in order to better understand and develop strategies for preventing and reducing harm, as well as promoting continuous improvement in the quality and safety of the care provided. The present study aimed at structuring three products, namely: Product 1 ­ Technical and technological bibliographic product entitled "Characterization of incidents in a federal public hospital between the years 2014 and 2019"; Product 2 ­ Technical and technological bibliographic product entitled "Creation of an internal online system for notification of incidents in the hospital space: experience report". Product 3 ­ Technical production entitled "Guiding guide for the proper filling of data in the internal online system for notification of incidents". Objective: Create an internal online system for monitoring incidents in a federal hospital, using FormSUS, as well as organizing a guiding guide for its use to assist professionals in the notification process. Materials and methods: The first product was a cross-sectional study after searching a secondary database with restricted access for the period from 2014 to 2019, which identified 10,837 incidents classified according to the International Patient Safety Goals: Adverse Events, Incidents Without Damage, Almost Failure, Circumstances Notifiable. The notification system was built using the platform of the Informatics Department of the Unified Health System to create public forms, known as FormSUS version 3.0. The instrument already exists at the Ministry of Health based on the FormSUS interface organized from data, such as: hospitalization data, date of the incident, complete description of the incident, identification of the notifying professional, contact by e-mail, telephone or in person, position and function of the notifying professional. Results: Finally, a guiding guide for filling out notifications in a simple way was structured, based on the most frequent doubts, in which the incidents are explained in detail and how to access the internal online notification system for sending to the Patient Safety Center. Conclusions: Characterizing and analyzing the data related to the incidents that occurred in the hospital is a fundamental exercise, as it helps the process of continuous education on patient safety. Based on this knowledge, the creation of an online notification system, and the manual for the correct filling of forms, can contribute to increase the professionals' adherence to the notifications and bring reliable information for the development of strategies that reduce harm to the patient

Rational drug use in hospital settings - areas that can be changed.

Irrational use of drugs occurs at all levels of healthcare. This phenomenon can also be observed in hospitals. Irrational use of a drug contributes to a decrease in the patient's quality of treatment and often causes negative health consequences. For this reason, it is essential to consider methods that can be introduced in hospitals to increase the safety and effectiveness of the drugs used. The article presents selected methods of rationalization of drug management that can be used in hospitals.

Impact of a change of bronchodilator medications in a hospital drug formulary on intra- and out-of-hospital drug prescriptions: interrupted time series design with comparison group.

BACKGROUND: Hospital drug formularies are reduced lists of drugs designed to optimise inpatient care. Adherence to the drugs included in such formularies is not always 100% but is generally very high. Little research has targeted the impact of a change in these formularies on outpatient drug prescriptions. This study therefore sought to evaluate the impact of a change affecting bronchodilator medications in a hospital drug formulary on intra- and out-of-hospital drug prescriptions in a region in north-western Spain. Two new drugs belonging to this same class were brought onto the out-of-hospital market, overlapping with the intervention. METHODS: We used a natural before-after quasi-experimental design with control group based on monthly data. The intervention evaluated was the modification of a hospital drug formulary, which involved withdrawing salmeterol/fluticasone in order to retain formoterol/budesonide as the sole inhaled corticosteroid and long-acting beta-agonist (ICS/LABA). Using official data sources, we extracted the following dependent variables: defined daily doses (DDD) per 1000 inhabitants per day, DDD per 100 bed-days, and cost per DDD. RESULTS: Intra-hospital use showed a 173.2% rise (95% CI 47.3-299.0%) in the medication retained in the formulary, formoterol/budesonide, and a 94.9% drop (95% CI 77.9-111.9%) in the medication withdrawn from the formulary, salmeterol/fluticasone. This intervention led to an immediate reduction of 75.9% (95% CI 82.8-68.9%) in the intra-hospital cost per DDD of ICS/LABA. No significant changes were observed in out-of-hospital use. CONCLUSIONS: Although this intervention was cost-effective in the intra-hospital setting, the out-of-hospital impact of a change in the drug formulary cannot be generalised to all types of medications and situations.

Managing conflicts of interest in pharmacy and therapeutics committees: A proposal for multicentre formulary development.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: While many countries have central agencies responsible for formulary development, within the United States, each hospital, health care system, or insurance provider has their own pharmacy and therapeutic committee, leading to both inefficiencies and inequalities across formularies. The number and variety of processes within pharmacy and therapeutic committees also increases the likelihood that conflicts of interest will influence the development of formularies. We sought to determine how such influences could be reduced by reviewing international evidence related to the presence and harms of conflicts of interest in formulary development. METHODS: Several approaches have been taken to reduce the influence of conflicts of interest in pharmacy and therapeutics committee processes, including include disclosure, recusal, exclusion, universal consideration and dual committees. The feasibility of each of these approaches is considered in the context of the United States. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: A proposal is drawn from the discussion of various approaches to conflicts of interest in pharmacy and therapeutics committees: multicenter formulary development. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Multicentre formulary development, where resources are pooled across institutions, may lead to a reduction in the influence of conflicts of interest in pharmacy and therapeutics committee processes in the United States, increasing the chances of including the most safe, efficacious and cost-effective drugs on formularies.

Impact of removal and restriction of me-too medicines in a hospital drug formulary on in- and outpatient drug prescriptions: interrupted time series design with comparison group.

BACKGROUND: The study covered in- and out-of-hospital care in a region in north-western Spain. The intervention evaluated took the form of a change in the hospital drugs formulary. Before the intervention, the formulary contained four of the five low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) marketed in Spain. The intervention consisted of withdrawing two LMWHs (bemiparin and dalteparin) from the formulary and restricting the use of another (tinzaparin), leaving only enoxaparin as an unrestricted prescription LMWH. Accordingly, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effect on in- and outpatient drug prescriptions of removing and restricting the use of several LMWHs in a hospital drugs formulary. METHODS: We used a natural, before-after, quasi-experimental design with a control group and monthly data from January 2011 to December 2016. Based on data drawn from official Public Health Service sources, the following dependent variables were extracted: defined daily doses (DDD) per 1000 inhabitants per day (DDD/TID), DDD per 100 stays per day, and expenditure per DDD. RESULTS: The two compounds that were removed from the formulary registered an immediate decrease at both an intra- and out-of-hospital level (66.6% and 55.6% for bemiparin and 73.0% and 92.2% for dalteparin, respectively); similarly, the compound that was restricted also registered an immediate decrease (36.1% and 9.0% at the in- and outpatient levels, respectively); in contrast, the remaining LMWH (enoxaparin) registered an immediate, significant increase at both levels (44.9% and 32.6%, respectively). The intervention led to an immediate reduction of 6.8% and a change in trend in out-of-hospital cost/DDD; it also avoided an expenditure of €477,317.1 in the 21 months following the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that changes made in a hospital drugs formulary towards more efficient medications may lead to better use of pharmacotherapeutic resources in its health catchment area.

Use of non-formulary high-cost medicines in an Australian public hospital.

Background Clinicians prescribe high-cost medicines for rare diseases and nonapproved indications when conventional therapies have failed. Objective To examine the use of non-formulary high-cost medicines at an Australian public hospital. Methods Retrospective audit of individual patient use applications for nonformulary medicines costing more than $5000 AUD per year at a large tertiary referral hospital in Adelaide, South Australia over a 12-month study period from January 2015 to December 2015. Main outcome measures Total cost of non-formulary high-cost medicines, medication class, indications for use, level of supporting evidence and proposed monitoring outcomes. Results Eighty-seven individual patient use applications were examined. All except one were approved, at a total cost of $1,339,203 AUD. The most common drug classes were anti-CD20 (n = 33, 38%), combined antiretrovirals (n = 10, 11%) and TNF-alpha antagonists (n = 10, 11%). There were 56 indications for these medicines with the majority being inflammatory conditions (n = 52, 60%), followed by infections (n = 14, 16%) and malignancies (n = 14, 16%). Of the first-time individual patient use applications (n = 63), there were 25 applications (40%) that provided a case series as supporting evidence. Approximately half of new individual patient use applications (n = 32) proposed an objective monitoring outcome, but few (n = 13, 21%) contained sufficient information to allow a third party to determine efficacy of the medication. Conclusions Non-formulary high-cost medicines are being used for a broad range of indications based largely on low levels of evidence. Prospective definition of an adequate response to treatment and reporting of these outcomes is required to improve the evidence-base and to aid decision-making for subsequent treatment courses.

Economic Outcomes Associated with Safety Interventions by a Pharmacist-Adjudicated Prior Authorization Consult Service.

BACKGROUND: The establishment of a formulary management system ensures that health care professionals work together in an integrated patient care process to promote clinically sound, safe, and cost-effective medication therapy. Pharmacists have a foundational role within this system. A pharmacist-adjudicated prior authorization drug request (PADR) consult service has the potential to optimize drug therapy by decreasing medication misuse, minimizing adverse drug events (ADEs), and preventing medication errors. OBJECTIVES: To (a) determine cost avoidance associated with pharmacist-adjudicated PADR safety interventions within the Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System and (b) evaluate cost savings associated with pharmacist-adjudicated PADRs not approved due to a safety intervention, evaluate cost avoidance and direct cost savings based on clinical specialty of pharmacist adjudicating PADR, and characterize severity of avoided ADEs. METHODS: Pharmacist-adjudicated PADRs not approved between July 1, 2016, and June 30, 2017, because of safety interventions were retrospectively reviewed. Cost avoidance was determined by multiplying the probability of ADE occurrence in the absence of PADR safety intervention by the estimated cost avoided based on the type of intervention. Direct cost savings was calculated by totaling the cost of requested medications not approved for each PADR and subtracting the cost of recommended alternative therapies and cost of pharmacist PADR review. All potential ADEs avoided were reviewed by a panel of 3 clinical pharmacists to validate ADE classification and ADE probability and severity scores. Descriptive statistics were used for all analyses. RESULTS: Of the 910 PADRs that were not approved during the study period, 96 met inclusion criteria. Pharmacist-adjudicated PADR safety interventions resulted in a total cost avoidance of $24,485.34 (mean = $255.06) and a direct cost savings of $288,695.63 (mean = $3,007.25). The practice settings of anticoagulation and infectious diseases PADRs resulted in the largest contribution to cost avoidance and direct cost savings, respectively. Prevented ADEs were classified as major for 64.6% of the PADRs. CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacist-adjudicated PADR safety reviews resulted in substantial economic benefit and prevention of major ADEs. This analysis supports the pharmacist's role in a formulary management system to optimize medication therapy. DISCLOSURES: This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for profit sectors. The authors have nothing to disclose.

Use of economic predictions to make formulary decisions.

PURPOSE: The accuracy of cost savings and reimbursement predictions for medications added to an academic medical center formulary was assessed. METHODS: Formulary changes over a 5-year period were reviewed by the investigators. Medications were included if the medication was added to formulary and the monograph included cost savings or reimbursement data that indicated a positive net margin. The primary endpoints were percent predicted cost savings and net margin per medication based on medication cost only. Secondary endpoints included the percent of medications with at least 100% predicted cost savings or net margin and evaluation of median percent predicted savings or net margin individually. RESULTS: The pharmacy and therapeutics committee reviewed 558 formulary agenda items, 184 of which were selected for further analysis. In total, 19 medications were identified as having a predicted monetary advantage. The endpoints of percent predicted cost savings and net margin yielded a median of 76.5% (range 72.9-188.71%) (n = 3) and 148.2% (IQR 108.9-543.3%) (n = 16), respectively. For 13 (68%) of 19 medications, the percent predicted cost savings or net margin was at least 100%. CONCLUSION: Economic predictions utilized for formulary management at an academic medical center generated net positive monetary value for medications where predicted cost savings or reimbursement factored into the decision to add a medication to the formulary.

The effectiveness of formulary restriction and preauthorization at an academic medical center.

The impact of formulary restriction and preauthorization (FRPA) on prescribing trends was examined over a 5-year period at an academic medical center. Ordinary least squares regression was used to identify hospital units demonstrating statistically significant trends in prescription of restricted agents. Significant decreases in restricted drug use were seen on 2 of 7 medicine units subject to FRPA, whereas a significant increase was seen in 1 of 4 surgical units subject to FRPA.

The Few. The Effective. The Cheapest. The Waste-Free Formulary.

The Pacific Business Group on Health in developing a "waste-free formulary" that it hopes all purchasers could use. Such a formulary would be limited to drugs with proven clinical utility and among those, the low-cost alternatives. It is using a number of algorithms to evaluate medications.

Maximizing Savings and Efficiencies While Managing an Inpatient Drug Formulary and Inventory.

Continual price increases of pharmaceutical products have taken a great toll on pharmacy expenditures. Cost of prescription drugs for the health-care system increased by an average of 11.7% in 2015. In today's market with ever-increasing drug costs, it is important to focus on using medications in a manner that optimizes patient care, as well as being fiscally responsible for the health-care system. There are many reports, services, and analytics available that help identify areas for improvement and optimization. However, it is important for pharmacists to be creative and find novel ways to decrease the inventory cost and increase efficiencies. Doing this will improve the bottom line for the organization and allow for a decrease in health-care spending.

Analysis of the drug formulary and the purchasing process at a Moroccan university medical center.

AIM: To give an overview of the pharmaceutical policy in the largest medical center in Morocco, a developing country in socio-economic transition. METHODS: This is an analytical descriptive study of the drug formulary and the purchasing process carried out at the Ibn Sina University Medical Center. RESULTS: Our formulary included 830 drugs belonging to 14 classes according to the Anatomical, Therapeutic and Chemical (ATC) Classification System. There was a respective predominance of class N (21.8%), class B (13.5%), and class J (12.6%). Injectable route was dominant (46%). Drugs had a significant actual benefit in 70% (according to the French Data), reimbursable in 42.8%, essential in 29.2% according to World Health Organization (WHO) list, and in 36.9% according to the Moroccan list. The calls for tenders included 542 drugs representing 65% of the formulary, and the attribution rate was 71%. The main reason for non-attribution was the lack of offers. Generics accounted for 45% by volume and 26.5% by value. CONCLUSION: With this first study, we were able to identify key indicators on drugs used in the largest medical center in Morocco. The current challenge is to introduce pharmacoeconomics in decision making concerning the updates of the drug formulary.

Strategies for success in creating an effective multihospital health-system pharmacy and therapeutics committee.

PURPOSE: Lessons learned from the creation of a multihospital health-system formulary management and pharmacy and therapeutics (P&T) committee are described. SUMMARY: A health system can create and implement a multihospital system formulary and P&T committee to provide evidence-based medications for ideal healthcare. The formulary and P&T process should be multidisciplinary and include adequate representation from system hospitals. The aim of a system formulary and P&T committee is standardization; however, the system should allow flexibility for differences. Key points for a successful multihospital system formulary and P&T committee are patience, collaboration, resilience, and communication. When establishing a multihospital health-system formulary and P&T committee, the needs of individual hospitals are crucial. A designated member of the pharmacy department needs to centrally coordinate and manage formulary requests, medication reviews and monographs, meeting agendas and minutes, and a summary of decisions for implementation. It is imperative to create a timeline for formulary reviews to set expectations, as well as a process for formulary appeals. Collaboration across the various hospitals is critical for successful formulary standardization. When implementing a health-system P&T committee or standardizing a formulary system, it is important to be patient and give local sites time to make practice changes. Evidence-based data and rationale must be provided to all sites to support formulary changes. Finally, there must be multidisciplinary collaboration. CONCLUSION: There are several options for formulary structures and P&T committees in a health system. Potential strengths and barriers should be evaluated before selecting a formulary management process.

Controlling postoperative use of i.v. acetaminophen at an academic medical center.

PURPOSE: Results of an interprofessional formulary initiative to decrease postoperative prescribing of i.v. acetaminophen are reported. SUMMARY: After a medical center added i.v. acetaminophen to its formulary, increased prescribing of the i.v. formulation and a 3-fold price increase resulted in monthly spending of more than $40,000, prompting an organizationwide effort to curtail that cost while maintaining effective pain management. The surgery, anesthesia, and pharmacy departments applied the Institute for Healthcare Improvement's Model for Improvement to implement (1) pharmacist-led enforcement of prescribing restrictions, (2) retrospective evaluation of i.v. acetaminophen's impact on rates of opioid-related adverse effects, (3) restriction of prescribing of the drug to 1 postoperative dose on select patient care services, and (4) guideline-driven pain management according to an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol. Monitored metrics included the monthly i.v. acetaminophen prescribing rate, the proportion of i.v. acetaminophen orders requiring pharmacist intervention to enforce prescribing restrictions, and prescribing rates for select adjunctive analgesics. Within a year of project implementation, the mean monthly i.v. acetaminophen prescribing rate decreased by 83% from baseline to about 6 doses per 100 patient-days, with a decline in the monthly drug cost to about $4,000. Documented pharmacist interventions increased 2.7-fold, and use of oral acetaminophen, ketorolac, and gabapentin in ERAS areas increased by 18% overall. CONCLUSION: An interprofessional initiative at a large medical center reduced postoperative use of i.v. acetaminophen by more than 80% and yielded over $400,000 in annual cost savings.

Towards a Transparent, Credible, Evidence-Based Decision-Making Process of New Drug Listing on the Hong Kong Hospital Authority Drug Formulary: Challenges and Suggestions.

The aim of this article is to describe the process, evaluation criteria, and possible outcomes of decision-making for new drugs listed in the Hong Kong Hospital Authority Drug Formulary in comparison to the health technology assessment (HTA) policy overseas. Details of decision-making processes including the new drug listing submission, Drug Advisory Committee (DAC) meeting, and procedures prior to and following the meeting, were extracted from the official Hong Kong Hospital Authority drug formulary management website and manual. Publicly-available information related to the new drug decision-making process for five HTA agencies [the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE), the Scottish Medicines Consortium (SMC), the Australia Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (PBAC), the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH), and the New Zealand Pharmaceutical Management Agency (PHARMAC)] were reviewed and retrieved from official documents from public domains. The DAC is in charge of systemically and critically appraising new drugs before they are listed on the formulary, reviewing submitted applications, and making the decision to list the drug based on scientific evidence to which safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness are the primary considerations. When compared with other HTA agencies, transparency of the decision-making process of the DAC, the relevance of clinical and health economic evidence, and the lack of health economic and methodological input of submissions are the major challenges to the new-drug listing policy in Hong Kong. Despite these challenges, this review provides suggestions for the establishment of a more transparent, credible, and evidence-based decision-making process in the Hong Kong Hospital Authority Drug Formulary. Proposals for improvement in the listing of new drugs in the formulary should be a priority of healthcare reforms.

Review of Nonformulary Medication Approvals in an Academic Medical Center.

BACKGROUND: The Joint Commission requires hospitals to formally review formulary medications at least annually based on new clinical information. Although review of nonformulary medication (NFM) use is not required, frequent and inappropriate use of NFMs has the potential to increase hospital costs, negatively affect quality of care, and increase medication errors. Limited resources may restrict an institution's ability to review NFM use in addition to the required annual formulary review. NFM use at Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH) was reviewed to provide insight on how to best direct an NFM review that is both effective and efficient. How an NFM review may negatively affect cost, quality of care, and medication errors is also inferred. METHODS: All approved NFM requests between 2009 and 2012 from Brigham and Women's Hospital's computerized provider order entry system were extracted and categorized according to the American Hospital Formulary Service (AHFS) Pharmacologic-Therapeutic Classification System. RESULTS: Of the 15,356,016 new medication orders, there were 223,266 NFM approvals for 433 unique NFMs. NFMs were categorized into 91 AHFS, 14 combination, and 4 "Others" classes. Twenty-five AHFS Classes accounted for approximately the top 90% of all NFM approvals, and the top 2 NFMs in each class accounted for a majority of the NFM approvals. CONCLUSION: Only a few classes of medications and a few medications within each class accounted for most of the NFM use at BWH. Targeting review of the most frequently used NFMs in each class may be a feasible strategy to reviewing NFMs annually that is both effective and efficient in optimizing formulary benefits.

Estimating Generic Drug Use with Electronic Health Records Data from a Health Care Delivery System: Implications for Quality Improvement and Research.

BACKGROUND: Generic drug use in the outpatient setting is typically measured with adjudicated pharmacy claims; however, not all delivery systems have access to these data for their clinical populations. OBJECTIVE: To develop an algorithm to estimate generic drug use in an outpatient setting using electronic health records (EHR) data. METHODS: Twenty-five therapeutic classes were chosen with the potential for low generic use that were prescribed to managed care beneficiaries in a health care system in Northern California. An algorithm was developed to estimate generic drug use based on medication names and dispense-as-written requests from electronic prescriptions, as well as information on generic availability at the time the prescriptions were written. The algorithm was used to quantify a generic utilization rate (GUR) across therapeutic classes and was validated by comparing the estimated GUR to the true GUR, using pharmacy claims corresponding to prescriptions in the same patient cohort. RESULTS: Among managed care beneficiaries, 104,859 prescriptions were identified for drugs in the therapeutic classes of interest with corresponding pharmacy claims. The algorithm estimated a GUR of 73.7% across 25 unique classes. The actual GUR based on pharmacy claims was 73.1%. Sensitivity (97%) and specificity (89%) of the algorithm were high, and total percentage of agreement was 95%. CONCLUSIONS: An algorithm that estimates generic drug use performed well in a population of managed care beneficiaries. Health care delivery systems may apply methods described in this article to quantify generic drug use in their ambulatory populations for quality improvement and research initiatives, particularly when pharmacy claims are unavailable. DISCLOSURES: This study was funded by a grant from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in cooperative agreement with the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine and the Palo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute (1U01FD005267-01). Romanelli has received research grant support from Pfizer and Janssen Scientific Affairs. Authors have no other conflicts to disclose. Romanelli and Segal contributed the study concept and design. Nimbal took the lead in data collection, assisted by Romanelli. All authors were involved with data interpretation and revision of the manuscript. The manuscript was written by Romanelli and Nimbal.

Economic Outcomes Associated with a Pharmacist-Adjudicated Formulary Consult Service in a Veterans Affairs Medical Center.

BACKGROUND: Several cost analysis studies have been conducted looking at clinical and economic outcomes associated with clinical pharmacist services in a variety of health care settings. However, there is a paucity of data regarding the economic impact of clinical pharmacist involvement in formulary management at the hospital level. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate economic outcomes of a pharmacist-adjudicated formulary management consult service in a Veterans Affairs (VA) medical center offering outpatient and inpatient services. METHODS: This VA medical center uses a pharmacist-adjudicated formulary management system for review of restricted drug consults. A retrospective review of electronic medical records was conducted to identify restricted drug consults at this institution between January 1, 2014, and March 31, 2014. Only restricted drug consults that were not approved were included for evaluation in order to best characterize the effects of formulary interventions by pharmacists. Economic outcomes were determined as direct cost savings by comparing the cost of requested drug with the recommended drug and accounting for the cost of pharmacist review. Characteristics of consults that were not approved and pharmacist rationale were also evaluated. RESULTS: Of 1,802 restricted drug consults adjudicated by a pharmacist during the study period, 198 consults in 190 individual patients met criteria for inclusion and were evaluated. The most commonly requested indications were dyslipidemia, pain, and diabetes, while the most commonly requested drugs were rosuvastatin, insulin pens, tamsulosin, varenicline, ezetimibe, and rivaroxaban. The majority of consults were requested for outpatient use. Total cost savings among 195 evaluable consults was $420,324.05, while mean cost savings per consult was $2,229.43 (range: -$3,009.27-$65,982.36). The highest cost savings were seen with outpatient use. CONCLUSIONS: A pharmacist-adjudicated formulary consult service in a VA medical center was associated with a substantial cost savings after adjustment for cost of pharmacist review. Future research should assess clinical outcomes associated with a restrictive formulary management system. DISCLOSURES: No outside funding supported this study. None of the authors report any financial interests or potential conflict of interest with regard to this work. Study concept and design were created by all authors. Data were collected and interpreted by Britt, with input from all authors. The manuscript was written by Britt and revised by all authors.