Faricimab in Previously Treated Eyes With Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: An Assessment of Durability and Treatment Outcomes.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the efficacy and durability of faricimab in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) who were previously treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective case series was conducted at a single tertiary center in the United States. It focused on nAMD patients who transitioned to faricimab after initial anti-VEGF therapy, with a follow-up period of at least 9 months. "Complete dryness" was defined as the absence of intra- and/or subretinal fluid on optical coherence tomography. Durability was gauged by the extension of treatment intervals relative to the injection frequency of the previous agent. RESULTS: Sixty-two eyes from 62 patients were included. Treatment interval ranged from 5 to 10 weeks; 10 (16%) patients were able to be extended by 2 or more weeks compared to their previous regimen. Median (interquartile range [IQR]) central field thickness was 310 µm (254, 376) on initiating faricimab and declined by the ninth month (P values at 3, 6, and 9 months were 0.01, 0.02, and 0.07, respectively). Median (IQR) visual acuity at initiation of faricimab was 0.4 (0.20, 0.50) and did not change by the ninth month. Complete anatomical dryness was present in 10 (16%) eyes before switching; 90% remained dry at 9 months. Of 52 (84%) incompletely dry eyes before switching, 15% achieved complete dryness by 9 months on faricimab. CONCLUSIONS: Faricimab modestly improved the treatment intervals for a small proportion of previously treated patients on anti-VEGF therapy. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2024;55:504-509.].

Crotalidae Polyvalent Immune Fab and Cost-Effective Management of Hospital Admissions for Snakebites.

BACKGROUND: Venomous snakebites are a common clinical scenario in the Southeastern United States. CroFab® (Crotalidae Polyvalent Immune Fab (Ovine), BTG, Wales, UK) antivenom is indicated in cases involving pit vipers and is known to be expensive. The treatment protocol for snakebites is based on clinically subjective measures triggering the application, or escalation of, antivenom administration. The purpose of this study is to characterize the use of CroFab at our institution and to evaluate the impact of its use regarding cost and overall outcomes. We suspect that it is often used but potentially less often needed. We hypothesized that CroFab use was associated with increased length of stay (LOS) without an observed difference in patient outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review of snakebite patients at our level-1 trauma center from 2000 to 2016 was performed. Snakebite location, snake species, number of vials of CroFab administered, hospital LOS, intensive care unit (ICU) LOS, and complications were identified for each patient. Patients were divided into CroFab (C) and no CroFab (NC) groups. RESULTS: One hundred ninety patients with venomous snakebites were included. 53.7% of patients received CroFab. There was no difference in the complication rate of C versus NC groups, (P = .1118). CroFab use was associated with longer hospital LOS (P < .0001) and ICU LOS (P < .0001). DISCUSSION: CroFab use was associated with increased LOS in our patient population. There was no difference in observed outcomes between the C and NC groups. These findings imply that CroFab is potentially over-used in our patient population.

Nonclinical Safety Assessment of Anti-Factor D: Key Strategies and Challenges for the Nonclinical Development of Intravitreal Biologics.

PURPOSE: The nonclinical toxicology program described here was designed to characterize the safety profile of anti-factor D (AFD; FCFD4514S, lampalizumab) to support intravitreal (ITV) administration in patients with geographic atrophy (GA). METHODS: The toxicity of AFD was assessed in a single-dose and 6-month repeat-dose study in monkeys at doses up to 10 mg/eye. Toxicity was assessed by clinical ophthalmic examinations, intraocular pressure measurements, ocular photography, electroretinography, fluorescein angiography, optical coherence tomography, and anatomic pathology. RESULTS: Systemic exposure to AFD generally increased with the increase in dose level. The increases in mean maximal concentration and area under the curve values were roughly dose proportional. No accumulation of AFD was observed following 10 doses, and drug exposures were not affected by anti-drug antibodies. AFD was locally and systemically well tolerated in monkeys following ITV doses of up to 10 mg/eye. Ocular effects associated with AFD were limited to transient, reversible, dose-related, aqueous cell responses and injection-related, mild, vitreal cell responses. In the 6-month repeat-dose study, 2 monkeys had a nonspecific immune response to AFD that resulted in severe ocular inflammation, attributed to administration of a heterologous (humanized) protein. CONCLUSIONS: The comprehensive toxicology program in monkeys described here was designed to evaluate the safety profile of AFD and to support multiple ITV injections in the clinic. Administration of a heterologous (humanized) protein presents a challenge, and immunogenicity in nonclinical species is not predictive of immunogenicity in humans. Taken together, the results of the nonclinical program described here support the use of AFD in patients with GA.

Assessment of Digoxin-Specific Fab Fragment Dosages in Digoxin Poisoning.

Digoxin poisoning still remains a common cause of morbidity and mortality. Fortunately, digoxin-specific Fab fragments are commercially available as an antidote. However, these Fab fragments are several thousand dollars per vial. There is a standardized formula to calculate appropriate Fab fragment dosage based on the serum digoxin concentration. This can greatly reduce the amount of Fab fragment administered. There is also an empiric dosing guideline recommending 6-10 vials be given; however, this may result in higher amounts of Fab fragments being administered than required. We performed this study to assess the amounts of digoxin-specific Fab fragments administered in the treatment of digoxin poisonings recorded in a poison control system database from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2009, in which digoxin serum concentrations were available. This was a retrospective study of 278 patients, 107 with acute poisonings (group A) and 171 following chronic poisoning (group B). In group A, the calculated Fab dose was higher than the calculated dose based on available concentrations in 39 (36%) of group A and 15 (9%) of group B patients. The average wholesale price cost of the excessive dosages ranged from $4818 to as high as $50,589 per patient. Our data suggests that clinician education on digoxin poisoning and the use of the standardized formula to calculate the Fab dose may decrease over utilization and decrease costs associated with the administration of digoxin-specific Fab fragments in the treatment of digoxin poisonings.

FabAV antivenin use after copperhead snakebite: clinically indicated or knee-jerk reaction?

Abstract Background Crotalidae Polyvalent Immune Fab (Ovine) (FabAV) antivenin is commonly recommended after pit viper snakebites. Because copperhead envenomations are usually self-limited, some physicians are reluctant to use this costly treatment routinely, while others follow a more liberal approach. We hypothesized that, in practice, only patients with evidence of significant (moderate or severe) copperhead envenomation [those with snakebite severity score (SSS) > 3] receive FabAV and examined a large cohort to determine the relationship between clinical findings and FabAV administration. Methods All data from patients evaluated for copperhead snakebite at a rural tertiary referral center from 5/2002 to 10/2013 were compiled. Demographics, transfer status, antivenin use, and clinical findings were collected; SSS was calculated. The relationships among FabAV use, clinical findings, and SSS were analyzed using t-test, chi-square, and Pearson’s coefficient (p < 0.05 was significant). Results During the study period, 318 patients were treated for copperhead snakebite; 44 (13.8 %) received antivenin. Median dose was four vials (range: 1–10; IQR: 4,6). There were no deaths. Most patients receiving FabAV (63.6 %) were admitted. With regard to demographics and symptoms, only the degree of swelling (moderate vs. none/mild; p < 0.01) and bite location (hand/arm vs. leg: p < 0.0001) were associated with FabAV use. A SSS > 3, indicating moderate or severe envenomation, was only very weakly correlated with antivenin use (r = 0.217;p < 0.0001). The majority of patients with SSS > 3 (65.8 %) did not receive antivenin while most patients who did receive antivenin (70.5 %) had SSS ≤ 3 (indicating mild envenomation). Conclusions Considerable variation occurs in antivenin administration after copperhead snakebite. Use of FabAV appears poorly correlated with patients’ symptoms. This practice may expose patients to the risks of antivenin and increasing costs of medical care without improving outcomes. Guidelines used for treating other pit viper strikes, such as rattlesnake or cottonmouth snakebite may be too liberal for copperhead envenomations. Our data suggests that most patients with mild or moderate envenomation appear to do well independent of FabAV use. We suggest, for patients with copperhead snakebite, that consideration be given to withholding FabAV for those without clinical evidence of severe envenomation until prospective randomized data are available.

Health outcomes and cost-effectiveness of certolizumab pegol in the treatment of Crohn's disease.

Crohn's disease (CD) causes chronic inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract and leads to fluctuations between active disease and remission. Certolizumab pegol is one of the newer biological treatments for patients with moderate-to-severe CD. Certolizumab pegol was shown to be effective in CD patients achieving response and remission in both randomized and non-randomized studies, and is an alternative biological treatment for CD. The available data show that certolizumab pegol achieves similar therapeutic efficacy and health-related quality of life scores in CD patients as the other biological agents, but at a higher cost, if dose escalation of other biologics is not considered. Considering subcutaneous self-administration, and lower number and frequency of injections, patients may prefer certolizumab pegol over the other biological treatments.

Abciximab bolus with optional infusion in intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

OBJECTIVES: The standard abciximab regimen is a bolus dose followed by a 12-h infusion. Whether the bolus dose alone is sufficient for ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients receiving a high loading dose of clopidogrel is unknown. DESIGN: In an observational study, 693 consecutive patients were treated with abciximab during percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Totally 354 patients received standard strategy of abciximab bolus and infusion followed by 339 patients that recieved abciximab bolus only (271 patients) or bolus and infusion if suboptimal result (68 patients) in combination with a higher loading dose of clopidogrel (600 mg) - the modified strategy. RESULTS: The two groups were similar regarding baseline characteristics and in hospital bleeding events. At 30 days, the composite of death, re-infarction or target vessel revascularization was 9.1% in the standard and 7.5% in the modified strategy (p = 0.45). The rate of stent thrombosis was lower in the modified strategy group with 0% and 2.3% in the standard group (p < 0.001) and the mean total medical cost was lower in the modified strategy group with €8032 and €8665 in the standard group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In primary percutaneous coronary intervention with a loading dose of 600 mg clopidogrel, it seems safe and cost-saving to give abciximab bolus with optional infusion.

Systematic assessment of factors influencing preferences of Crohn's disease patients in selecting an anti-tumor necrosis factor agent (CHOOSE TNF TRIAL).

BACKGROUND: Infliximab (IFX), adalimumab (ADA), and certolizumab pegol (CZP) have similar efficacy in induction and maintenance of clinical remission in Crohn's disease (CD). Given the comparable nature of these drugs, patient preferences may influence the choice of the product. We aimed to identify factors that may contribute to CD patients' decision in selecting one anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agent over the others. METHODS: A prospective survey was performed among anti-TNF-naïve CD patients. Prior to completion of a questionnaire, patients were provided with a written description of the three anti-TNF agents, focusing on indications, mode of administration, side effects, and scientific evidence of efficacy and safety for each drug. RESULTS: One hundred patients (47 females, mean age 45 ± 16 years, range 19-81) with an ileal, colonic, or ileocolonic (33%, 40%, and 27%, respectively) disease location completed the questionnaire. Based on the information provided, 36% of patients preferred ADA, 28% CZP, and 25% IFX, whereas 11% were undecided. The patients' decision in selecting a specific anti-TNF drug was influenced by the following factors: ease of use (69%), time required for therapy (34%), time interval between application of the drug (31%), scientific evidence for efficacy (19%), and fear of syringes (10%). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients preferred anti-TNF medications that were administered by subcutaneous injection rather than by intravenous infusion. Ease of use and time required for therapy were two major factors influencing the patients' selection of a specific anti-TNF drug. Patients' individual preferences should be taken into account when prescribing anti-TNF drugs.

A randomized two-by-two comparison of high-dose bolus tirofiban versus abciximab and unfractionated heparin versus bivalirudin during percutaneous coronary revascularization and stent placement: the tirofiban evaluation of novel dosing versus abciximab with clopidogrel and inhibition of thrombin (TENACITY) study trial.

BACKGROUND: In the absence of high-dose thienopyridines, placebo-controlled trials have demonstrated a reduction in ischemic events with intravenous glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). One head-to-head trial comparing abciximab and tirofiban among PCI patients found tirofiban to be inferior, and laboratory evidence confirmed that the bolus dose of tirofiban tested in that trial to be less effective than abciximab. Whether a higher bolus dose of tirofiban would be as efficacious as abciximab during PCI is uncertain. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients undergoing PCI were randomized equally to abciximab or to tirofiban, given as high-dose bolus (25 µg/kg) plus 12-hr infusion (0.15 µg/kg/min). All patients received aspirin and clopidogrel and were additionally randomized to unfractionated heparin or bivalirudin. Approximately 8,000 patients were to be studied, but after 383 were enrolled, the study sponsor discontinued the trial for financial reasons. The primary endpoint of 30-day death, myocardial infarction, or urgent target vessel revascularization occurred in 8.8% of patients randomized to abciximab and 6.9% of those randomized to tirofiban. The respective rates of major bleeding were 1.5 and 1.6%. Additionally, the primary endpoint occurred in 8.1% of patients randomized to unfractionated heparin and 7.6% of those randomized to bivalirudin. The respective rates of major bleeding were 2.5% and 0.5%. CONCLUSION: With limited assessment, this direct comparison of high-dose bolus tirofiban versus abciximab produced encouraging results and suggests that further study of this tirofiban dose regimen is warranted. The limited assessments comparing heparin and bivalirudin are consistent with prior observations.

Long-term results following switch from abciximab to eptifibatide during percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND: The usage of platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors improves the outcome during high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term effects after a planned switch from abciximab to eptifibatide during PCI. HYPOTHESIS: A switch from the general use of abciximab to eptifibatide as a GP IIb/IIIa in connection with PCI would not have any negative effects on long-term clinical outcomes. METHODS: To reduce costs, a general switch from abciximab to eptifibatide was instituted in 2004 in 2 university hospitals in Sweden. All patients treated 6 months before and 6 months after the switch were followed for 30 months. During the study period, 1038 patients underwent PCI and received a GP IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitor, 481 (46%) before the switch (Group A) and 557 (54%) after the switch (Group B). The 2 groups had similar baseline characteristics. The primary endpoint was the composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or new coronary revascularization (percutaneous or surgical); secondary endpoints were the individual components of this composite. A separate analysis was performed on patients treated for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction/unstable angina, and diabetes, respectively. Data were collected from the Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry. RESULTS: There were no differences between the groups in the primary endpoint (29.7% in Group A vs 29.3% in Group B; P = 0.48) or in any of the secondary endpoints. CONCLUSIONS: A switch from the general usage of abciximab to eptifibatide as a GP IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitor in connection with PCI did not seem to have any negative effects on long-term clinical outcomes.

Economic impact of same-day home discharge after uncomplicated transradial percutaneous coronary intervention and bolus-only abciximab regimen.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to estimate the economic impact of same-day home discharge compared with overnight hospitalization after transradial percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: Same-day home discharge after transradial PCI and a bolus-only abciximab regimen was found to be clinically noninferior to the abciximab standard therapy and overnight hospitalization in patients with various forms of acute coronary syndromes. METHODS: In the EASY (Early Discharge After Transradial Stenting of Coronary Arteries) trial, 1,005 patients were randomized after a bolus of abciximab and uncomplicated transradial coronary stenting, either to same-day home discharge and no infusion (outpatient group) or to overnight hospitalization and 12-h abciximab infusion (overnight-stay group). We estimated post-PCI health care cost (in Canadian dollars) of trial subjects and short-term economic impact of same-day home discharge. As randomization was done after the procedure, outcomes were similar, and PCI resource use showed minimal and nonsignificant differences, a post-PCI cost-minimization analysis was conducted. Detailed per-patient information of health care resources used immediately after PCI up to 30 days was collected. RESULTS: Mean post-PCI hospital stay was 8.9 h for outpatients versus 26.5 h for overnight-stay patients (p < 0.001). At 30-day follow-up, the mean cumulative medical cost per outpatient was $1,117 ± $1,554 versus $2,258 ± $1,328 for overnight-stay patients. The mean difference of $1,141 (95% confidence interval: $962 to $1,320) was mainly due to the extra night for overnight hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: In a real-world setting, same-day home discharge after uncomplicated transradial PCI and a bolus-only abciximab regimen resulted in a 50% relative reduction in medical costs. Extension of this outpatient strategy would be welcomed by the hospitals and reimbursement systems in a context of increasing demand for health care cost reduction. (Early Discharge After Transradial Stenting of Coronary Arteries [EASY]; NCT00169819).

Effect of certolizumab pegol with methotrexate on home and work place productivity and social activities in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of certolizumab pegol (CZP), a novel PEGylated anti-tumor necrosis factor, in combination with methotrexate (MTX) on productivity outside and within the home, and on participation in family, social, and leisure activities in adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: The efficacy and safety of CZP (200 mg and 400 mg) plus MTX were assessed in 2 phase III, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials (Rheumatoid Arthritis Prevention of Structural Damage [RAPID] 1 and RAPID 2). The novel, validated, RA-specific Work Productivity Survey (WPS-RA) was used to assess work place and home productivity. WPS-RA responses were collected at baseline and every 4 weeks until withdrawal/study completion. RESULTS: At baseline, 41.6% and 39.8% of subjects were employed outside the home in RAPID 1 and RAPID 2, respectively. Compared with placebo plus MTX, CZP plus MTX significantly reduced work absenteeism and presenteeism among patients working outside the home. Significant reductions in number of household days lost, household days with productivity reduced by >/=50%, and days lost due to RA for participation in family, social, and leisure activities were reported by patients in active treatment relative to placebo plus MTX. Improvements in all measures were observed with CZP plus MTX as early as week 4, and maintained until the study end (12 months in RAPID 1, 6 months in RAPID 2). Findings were consistent with clinical improvements with CZP plus MTX in both trials. CONCLUSION: CZP plus MTX improved productivity outside and within the home and resulted in more participation in social activities compared with placebo plus MTX. These observations suggest that considerable indirect cost gains might be achieved with this therapeutic agent in RA.

Assessment of the bioequivalence of brand and biogeneric formulations of abciximab for the treatment of acute coronary syndrome: a prospective, open-label, randomized, controlled study in Korean patients.

BACKGROUND: Abciximab has been found to reduce major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). A previous study reported on the tolerability of biogeneric abciximab in patients with ACS. This formulation has been approved by the Korea Food and Drug Administration and is currently being marketed. Its ex vivo antiplatelet effect, however, has not been compared with that of branded abciximab. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study was to compare ex vivo antiplatelet activity, angiographic outcome, and bleeding complications between biogeneric and branded abciximab. METHODS: This prospective, open-label, randomized, controlled study was conducted in Korea. Patients with ACS who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were randomized to receive biogeneric abciximab or branded abciximab. All patients received intracoronary unfractionated heparin 70 IU/kg and either biogeneric or branded abciximab 0.25 mg/kg IV bolus approximately 10 minutes before undergoing PCI, followed by a 0.125 microg/kg/min 12-hour infusion of the same formulation. The antiplatelet effect of both drugs was assessed at 3 time points (at baseline, and 10 minutes and 24 hours after the end of the bolus infusion) using a validated rapid platelet-function assay. RESULTS: In total, 37 patients (30 men and 7 women; 19 receiving biogeneric abciximab and 18 receiving branded abciximab) were included. Patient demographics did not differ significantly between the 2 groups (16 men [84.2%] and 3 women [15.8%] in the biogeneric group vs 14 men [77.8%] and 4 women [22.2%] in the branded group; mean [SD] age, 65 [11] vs 60 [10] years; weight, 64.6 [8.7] vs 67.9 [10.1] kg, respectively). The bolus and the continuous infusion of the biogeneric and branded formulations achieved similar levels of platelet inhibition, with a mean (SD) inhibition of platelet aggregation >90% at 10 minutes after the end of the bolus infusion (94.7% [8.2%] vs 92.6% [16.9%], respectively; P = NS) and >65% at 24 hours (68.1% [9.8%] vs 70.9% [9.7%]; P = NS) compared with baseline. One thrombolysis in myocardial infarction major bleeding complication (retro-peritoneal hemorrhage) was reported in a patient who received biogeneric abciximab. CONCLUSION: There were no statistically significant differences in the antiplatelet effects of these 2 formulations in this small, selected population of Korean patients with ACS.

Certolizumab pegol: new drug. As a last resort in Crohn's disease: continue to use other TNF alpha inhibitors.

(1) Infliximab and adalimumab, two TNF alpha-inhibitor immunosuppressants, are both available for use as a last resort in Crohn's disease. They are effective in about one in two patients but they carry a risk of serious infections, lymphoma and aggravation of heart failure; (2) Certolizumab is a new TNF alpha-inhibitor monoclonal antibody. It is pegylated to prolong its action, hence the name certolizumab pegol; (3) Certolizumab is sold in the United States for the treatment of Crohn's disease, after failure of conventional treatments. However, the European authorities issued a negative opinion on this drug, and the European Commission refused to grant marketing authorization on 21 May 2008. It is nonetheless available for named-patient compassionate use in France; (4) Certolizumab pegol has not been compared directly with infliximab or adalimumab; (5) In a double-blind placebo-controlled trial including 662 adults with an exacerbation of Crohn's disease, a 6-month course of certolizumab pegol reduced symptom intensity in slightly more patients than placebo (23% versus 16%). However, the rate of clinical remissions was similar (about 12% of patients overall); (6) In a placebo-controlled trial in 428 patients with an initial critical response to certolizumab pegol, maintaining this treatment for 6 months was more effective than switching to placebo. Clinical remissions were obtained at the end of treatment in respectively 48% and 29% of patients; (7) These short-term trials showed a higher frequency of infections with certolizumab pegol than with placebo; these infections ranged from mild respiratory tract infections to fatal tuberculosis. Some patients also developed autoantibodies and anti-certolizumab pegol antibodies, but the clinical implications are unclear. There is also evidence of an excess risk of haemorrhage. The risk of long-term adverse effects remains to be determined; (8) Certolizumab pegol is injected subcutaneously, once a month, on an outpatient basis, while adalimumab is injected twice a month; (9) In practice, as with other TNF alpha inhibitors used in Crohn's disease, certolizumab pegol is only modestly effective and carries a disturbing risk of adverse effects. In the absence of a better alternative, patients with Crohn's disease who might benefit from TNF alpha inhibitor therapy should continue to receive either infliximab or adalimumab, two drugs with which we have more experience.

Bolus-only versus bolus + infusion of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors during percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND: The present study was done to analyze if glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPI) bolus-only will reduce vascular/bleeding complications and cost with similar major adverse cardiac events (MACE) when compared with GPI bolus + infusion. Evidence-based therapy of GPI inhibitors during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) incorporates intravenous bolus followed by 12 to 18 hours of infusion. However, GPI bolus + infusion may increase vascular/bleeding complications and may not reduce MACE when compared with GPI bolus-only. METHODS: From January 1, 2003, to December 31, 2004, 2,629 consecutive patients received GPI during PCI at a single center. Of these, 1,064 patients received GPI bolus + infusion in 2003 and were compared with 1,565 patients that received GPI bolus-only in 2004. Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. RESULTS: Patients receiving GPI bolus-only had reduced vascular/bleeding complications when compared with bolus + infusion (4.9% vs 7%, P < .05, odds ratio 0.62, 95% confidence interval 0.45-0.89). Furthermore, ischemic complications were similar in both groups, including periprocedural creatine kinase-MB enzyme release (12.8% vs 15.3%, P = NS), MACE at 30 days (3.2% vs 3%, P = NS), and death and myocardial infarction at 1 year (7.1% vs 7.8%, P = NS). In addition, GPI bolus-only reduced cost in US dollars ($323 vs $706, P < .001) and increased ambulatory PCI (13.1% vs 3.2%, P < .01), with reduced length of stay (1.1 vs 1.6 days, P < .01), when compared with GPI bolus + infusion. CONCLUSIONS: Glycoprotein inhibitor bolus-only reduces vascular/bleeding complications with similar MACE and reduced cost when compared with GPI bolus + infusion. In addition, GPI bolus-only improved ambulatory PCI and reduced length of stay. These results are consistent with a safer and cost-effective strategy for bolus-only when GPI therapy is considered during PCI.

Assessment of digoxin antibody use in patients with elevated serum digoxin following chronic or acute exposure.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of antidotal therapy in patients with an elevated digitalis concentration following chronic or acute exposure. DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective review of patient records over 2 years in 20 city hospitals in France. PATIENTS: Overall 838 patients with an elevated serum digitalis concentration (digoxin > 1.95ng /ml or digitoxin > 23ng /ml) were included in the study. Of these, 67 (8%) had received antidotal therapy with Fab fragments. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: The relationships between previously reported prognostic criteria and use of antidotal therapy were investigated. We identified five independent factors that were associated with the use of antidotal therapy: acute overdose (OR 15.74), Fab fragment availability in the hospital (11.06), serum potassium (1.81), and heart rate (0.96). Mortality was significantly lower in Fab-treated (6%, 4/67) than untreated patients (15%, 117/770). CONCLUSIONS: Antidotal therapy is underused in patients with an elevated digitalis concentration especially in patients with chronic digitalis exposure. These patients in our series presented a higher mortality rate than patients with acute poisoning. Although they were older and tended to have a history of cardiac disease, they did not differ from patients with acute poisoning with regard to the main severity criteria and prognostic factors. The use of identical criteria for antidotal treatment after acute and chronic poisoning should help optimize outcomes. Fab fragment availability is insufficient in France but ranks only second after type of poisoning (acute or chronic) in the multivariate association with Fab treatment.