Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 213
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Saudi Med J ; 45(6): 585-590, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38830653

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To assess the prevalence of various frontal sinus fractures (FSF) and examine the relationships between these fractures, types of treatments, and potential complications. METHODS: A retrospective study was carried out in King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The study analyzed the records of patients who were diagnosed and treated with FSF from 2011-2021. Files with missing documents or incomplete treatment were excluded. The retrieved data includes: patients age, gender, types, locations, treatment, and complications of FSF. Data was analyzed by the statistical Package for the Social Sciences Statistics, version 23.0 using descriptive statistics and Chi-square test. RESULTS: A total of 72 cases were included, 94.4% males and 5.6% females. Road traffic accidents were the common cause of trauma (91%). Frontal sinus fractures were unilateral in 59.7% and associated other injuries in 80.6% of cases. Anterior table fractures were the largest proportion (58.3%), followed by anterior and posterior table (37.5%). The carried out surgical procedures were obliteration (23.9%), cranialization and obliteration (23.9%), and fixation only (52.2%). The post-operative complications were categorized into; neurological (22.2%), ophthalmic (15.3%), infection (2.8%), and deformity (16.7%). Anterior and posterior table had the highest percentage among these categories. CONCLUSION: Frontal sinus fractures were mostly required surgical treatment (63.9%) and post-operative complications occurred especially the neurological and ophthalmic. We recommend studies on the association of complications and different types of obliteration materials.


Assuntos
Acidentes de Trânsito , Seio Frontal , Fraturas Cranianas , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Humanos , Arábia Saudita/epidemiologia , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Feminino , Seio Frontal/lesões , Seio Frontal/cirurgia , Adulto , Fraturas Cranianas/epidemiologia , Fraturas Cranianas/terapia , Fraturas Cranianas/cirurgia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Acidentes de Trânsito/estatística & dados numéricos , Incidência , Centros de Atenção Terciária/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto Jovem , Adolescente , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Idoso , Criança
2.
Laryngoscope ; 134(7): 3120-3126, 2024 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38294281

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To discuss patient demographics and management and better understand the economic impact associated with the treatment of facial fractures at a major metropolitan level 1 trauma center. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. METHODS: We identified 5088 facial fractures in 2479 patients who presented from 2008 to 2022. Patient demographics, mechanism of injury, associated injuries, treatment information, and hospital charges were collected and analyzed to determine factors associated with surgical management and increased cost burden. RESULTS: Our 14-year experience identified 1628 males and 851 females with a mean age of 45.7 years. Orbital fractures were most common (41.2%), followed by maxilla fractures (20.8%). The most common mechanism was fall (43.0%). Surgical management was recommended for 41% of patients. The odds of surgical management was significantly lower in female patients, patients age 65 and older, and patients who presented after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. The odds of surgical management was significantly higher for patients who had a mandible fracture or greater than 1 fracture. The average cost of management was highest for naso-orbito-ethmoidal fractures ($37,997.74 ± 52,850.88), followed by LeFort and frontal fractures ($29.814.41 ± 42,155.73 and $27,613.44 ± 39.178.53, respectively). The highest contributor to the total average cost of management was intensive care unit-related costs for every fracture type, except for mandible fractures for which the highest contributor was operating room (OR)-related costs. CONCLUSIONS: This study represents one of the largest comprehensive databases of facial fractures and one of the first to provide a descriptive cost analysis of facial trauma management. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 134:3120-3126, 2024.


Assuntos
Fraturas Cranianas , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fraturas Cranianas/economia , Fraturas Cranianas/cirurgia , Fraturas Cranianas/epidemiologia , Fraturas Cranianas/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Ossos Faciais/lesões , Ossos Faciais/cirurgia , Adolescente , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/economia , Centros de Traumatologia/economia , Centros de Traumatologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Adulto Jovem , Fraturas Orbitárias/economia , Fraturas Orbitárias/cirurgia , Fraturas Orbitárias/epidemiologia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos
4.
F1000Res ; 12: 483, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38571567

RESUMO

Background: The complex nature of maxillofacial injuries can affect the surgical treatment outcomes and general well-being of the patient. To evaluate the efficiency of the surgical treatment, assessment of the quality of life (QOL) of the patients is of vital importance. Due to the absence of an exclusive QOL assessment tool for maxillofacial fractures, we introduce the 'Twenty-point quality of life assessment in facial trauma patients in Indian population'. The aim of this study was to assess and evaluate the QOL following surgical management of maxillofacial trauma patients based on the severity of the injury. Methods: The study consisted of 182 subjects divided into two groups of 91 each (Group A: severe facial injury and Group B: mild to moderate facial injury). The Facial Injury Severity Scale (FISS) was used to determine the severity of facial fractures and injuries. The twenty-point quality of life assessment tool includes Zone 1 (Psychosocial impact) and Zone 2 (Functional and aesthetic impact), with ten domains each to assess QOL. Results: In Zone 1, the mean scores for Group A and Group B were 38.6 and 39.26, respectively. In Zone 2, Group B (44.56) had higher mean scores compared to Group A (32.92) (p< 0.001). Group B (83.8) had higher mean scores compared to Group A (71.58) when the total of both Zone 1 and Zone 2 were taken into consideration (p<0,001). In Group A, 9 out of 91 patients had a total score of 81- 100 compared to 68 in the same range in Group B. Conclusions: Proper surgical management with adequate care to the hard and soft tissues can improve the QOL by reducing postoperative psychosocial and functional complications. Aesthetic outcomes play an important role in determining the QOL. Mild/ Moderate injuries show better QOL compared to severe maxillofacial injuries.


Assuntos
Traumatismos Maxilofaciais , Fraturas Cranianas , Humanos , Qualidade de Vida , Fraturas Cranianas/etiologia , Fraturas Cranianas/cirurgia , Traumatismos Maxilofaciais/cirurgia , Traumatismos Maxilofaciais/complicações , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
J Correct Health Care ; 28(5): 345-348, 2022 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36269603

RESUMO

A "slock" is a padlock in a sock used as a weapon in correctional facilities to induce trauma. This assessment examined the prevalence, pattern, and degree of slock- and padlock-induced facial fractures. This quality assessment initiative was performed through retrospective analysis of 435 incarcerated patients treated surgically for facial fractures at an academic medical center from 2011 to 2019. Fifty-seven patients (16%) described injury from a padlock, of whom 23 (6%) specified a slock. The prevalence of padlock-induced facial fractures doubled from 2012 to 2017. Padlock-induced facial fractures were determined to be more complex than those by a fist (p < .001). These findings support reducing the facial trauma in Louisiana correctional facilities by removing access to padlocks.


Assuntos
Traumatismos Faciais , Prisioneiros , Fraturas Cranianas , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Traumatismos Faciais/epidemiologia , Fraturas Cranianas/epidemiologia , Estabelecimentos Correcionais
6.
Otol Neurotol ; 43(10): e1180-e1186, 2022 12 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36214506

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Report the incidence of and treatment patterns for facial nerve palsy after skull base fracture. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: IBM MarketScan Commercial Database (2006-2019). PATIENTS: Human subjects with skull base fracture, per International Classification of Diseases-9th and 10th Revisions-Clinical Modification diagnosis codes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes were the incidence and median time to facial nerve palsy diagnosis within 30 days of skull base fracture. Secondary outcomes were treatments (corticosteroids, antivirals, facial nerve decompression, botulinum toxin, and facial reanimation), demographics, and rates of hearing loss, vertigo, tympanic membrane rupture, cerebrospinal fluid leak, comorbidities, and loss of consciousness. RESULTS: The 30-day incidence of facial nerve palsy after skull base trauma was 1.0% (738 of 72,273 patients). The median (95% confidence interval [CI]) time to diagnosis was 6 (6-7) days, and only 22.9% were diagnosed within 1 day. There were significantly higher rates (risk difference, 95% CI) of hearing loss (26%, 22-29%), tympanic membrane rupture (6.3%, 4.5-8.1%), cerebrospinal fluid leak (6.4%, 4.5-8.3%), comorbidity (14%, 10.4-17.6%), and loss of consciousness (24.3%, 20.7-27.9%). Loss of consciousness was associated with longer median (95% CI) time to facial nerve palsy diagnosis: 10 (9-10) days. Corticosteroids were the most common treatment but only reported for less than one-third of patients. Only eight patients underwent facial nerve decompression. CONCLUSIONS: Facial nerve palsy after skull base fracture is associated with higher comorbidity, and the diagnosis is often delayed. Few patients were treated with surgery, and there are inconsistencies in the types and timing of treatments.


Assuntos
Traumatismos Craniocerebrais , Paralisia Facial , Perda Auditiva , Fraturas Cranianas , Perfuração da Membrana Timpânica , Humanos , Paralisia Facial/epidemiologia , Paralisia Facial/etiologia , Paralisia Facial/terapia , Incidência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Perfuração da Membrana Timpânica/complicações , Traumatismos Craniocerebrais/complicações , Base do Crânio/cirurgia , Vazamento de Líquido Cefalorraquidiano/epidemiologia , Perda Auditiva/epidemiologia , Perda Auditiva/etiologia , Perda Auditiva/terapia , Inconsciência/complicações , Fraturas Cranianas/complicações
7.
J Craniofac Surg ; 33(6): 1725-1729, 2022 Sep 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35761447

RESUMO

ABSTRACT: The Wisconsin Criteria was developed for physicians evaluating facial trauma to determine the likelihood of facial fractures. Subsequent studies have not consistently validated these criteria. This study seeks to validate the Wisconsin Criteria and determine its utility in predicting operative facial fractures.Retrospective chart review of the trauma database registry at a Level I Trauma Center was conducted from September 2011 to May 2019. Adult patients who had a complete facial examination by otolaryngology or plastic surgery as well as a head computed tomography scan completed, were included. Fisher exact test was utilized for statistical analysis ( P < 0.05) and positive predictive value, and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated with a 95% confidence interval.After screening, 546 patients met eligibility, 448 had at least 1 finding of the Wisconsin Criteria, and 472 patients had facial fractures. The sensitivity of the Wisconsin Criteria for determining the presence of a facial fracture was 86.23%, the specificity was 44.59%, and the NPV was 33.67% ( P < .0001). Malocclusion was the criterion most specific in determining if a facial fracture was present (98.65%), and Glasgow Coma Score < 14 was the least specific (67.57%).The Wisconsin Criteria did aid in the identification of facial fractures in trauma patients with a comparable sensitivity, higher specificity, and much lower NPV than originally described. Further investigation should be done to validate the criteria in other large trauma centers.


Assuntos
Traumatismos Faciais , Fraturas Cranianas , Adulto , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Centros de Traumatologia , Wisconsin
8.
Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med ; 24(1): 27-33, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33847531

RESUMO

Importance: Although nasal bones are the most common type of facial fracture given their natural projection and vulnerability to trauma, there is a paucity of data on its trends. Objective: To report on the trends and costs associated with open and closed nasal bone fractures across the United States. Methods: A retrospective analysis from 2006 to 2014 was conducted of the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample by using the International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision codes for closed and open nasal bone fractures (802.0 and 802.1) presenting to emergency departments (ED). Trend analysis of total number and rate of visits, discharges, admissions, and associated costs were conducted. Results: Data from 1,253,399.741 records were collected. The total number of ED visits decreased by 2.05% for both open and closed nasal fractures from 2006 to 2014 whereas their associated costs increased (p < 0.001 and p < 0.05 for closed and open nasal fractures). Notably, open fractures were consistently costlier whereas closed fractures had a greater percent-increase in costs (76.65%). Conclusions and Relevance: This study identified a significant rise in nasal fracture costs, which can be reduced via use of cheaper diagnostic modalities and cost-effective endoscopic procedures.


Assuntos
Osso Nasal/lesões , Fraturas Cranianas/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/tendências , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fraturas Cranianas/diagnóstico , Fraturas Cranianas/economia , Fraturas Cranianas/terapia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
9.
Ann Plast Surg ; 88(4 Suppl 4): S361-S365, 2022 05 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37740469

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Orbital fractures represent one of the most common trauma-related facial fractures and may present with a variety of concomitant injuries. Many factors including age, associated diagnoses, and fracture complications are important in determining surgical candidacy. We used a statewide database to determine the prevalence of orbital fractures, rates of surgical repair during initial admission, and early patient outcomes. METHODS: A longitudinal analysis of patients with orbital fracture was performed using California's Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development patient discharge database for admissions occurring between January 2015 and December 2018.Patients were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes. The primary risk factor was surgical management of orbital fractures. The primary outcomes of interest were readmission requiring surgical management and complications of the fracture. Survival models were developed to evaluate the risk of a repair at readmission adjusting for relevant covariates. RESULTS: Of the 67,408 facial fractures included in our study, 8.7% (n = 5872) were diagnosed with orbital fractures. Among this population, 18.4% (n = 1082) underwent surgical repair during their initial admission. Patients were primarily male (71.1%; n = 4,173) and presented in a nonurgent fashion (93.7%; n = 5501). Less than half (42.8%) of patients with an urgent presentation and 16.8% of patients with a nonurgent presentation underwent repair. Centers of Medicaid & Medicare Services guidelines dictated presentation classification. Repair was associated with a significantly higher survival outcome. Orbital fractures were more frequently repaired in the setting of concomitant zygomatic, nasal, and LeFort I-III fractures. Increased risk in complications was observed in all concomitant fracture groups, and there existed a decreased risk of postsurgical complications in these same cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Although most orbital fractures were managed nonoperatively, our analysis found that rates of repair for orbital floor, maxillary, and zygomatic fractures were greater than for other facial fractures. Concomitant fractures were associated with an increased hazard ratio for complications. Although low in prevalence overall, the most often observed postoperative complications in this population were diplopia, glaucoma, and blindness/low vision.


Assuntos
Fraturas Maxilares , Fraturas Orbitárias , Fraturas Cranianas , Estados Unidos , Humanos , Idoso , Masculino , Fraturas Orbitárias/cirurgia , Planejamento em Saúde , Readmissão do Paciente , Medicare , California/epidemiologia
10.
J. oral res. (Impresa) ; 10(5): 1-14, oct. 31, 2021. tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-1397708

RESUMO

Background: This retrospective study was conducted to identify the epidemiological profile and treatment modalities linked to the maxillofacial trauma (MFT) managed in the Maxillofacial Surgery Departments of seven hospital centers in Antioquia, Colombia. Material and Methods: Clinical records with specific attention to sociodemographic characteristics, mechanisms of injury, type of MFT, location of injuries, and treatment modalities of MFT were collected from January to December 2017. Descriptive analyses using Pearson's chi-square tests were performed. Results: A total of 1356 records were retrieved. Males were significantly more affected, with a male-to-female ratio of 3.85:1. The most susceptible age group involved was young adults (18 to 40 years). A low percentage of alcohol (9.3%) and drugs consumption (2.5%) was recorded. Most common causes of MFT were road traffic accidents (RTA), falls, and interpersonal violence (IPV). Most injuries involved both soft and hard tissues followed by hard tissues and isolated open soft tissue injuries. Among fractures, the middle third was the most commonly affected site and the utmost method of treatment was open reduction and internal fixation. Conclusion: Within the limitations of the evidence available, this study has demonstrated that the gender, age stratum, and etiological factors, such as RTA, falls, and IPV, but no alcohol and/or psychoactive substances consumption, may have a significant influence on the prevalence, patterns, and treatment modalities of MFT in this sample population.


Antecedentes: Este estudio retrospectivo se realizó para identificar el perfil epidemiológico y las modalidades de tratamiento vinculados al Trauma Maxilofacial (TMF) atendido en los Servicios de Cirugía Maxilofacial de siete centros hospitalarios de Antioquia, Colombia. Material y Métodos: Se recopilaron historias clínicas con atención específica a las características sociodemográficas, mecanismos de lesión, tipo de TMF, ubicación de las lesiones y modalidades de tratamiento de TMF de enero a diciembre de 2017. Análisis descriptivos utilizando el chi-cuadrado de Pearson fueron realizados. Resultados: Se recuperaron un total de 1356 registros. Los hombres se vieron significativamente más afectados, con una relación hombre-mujer de 3,85:1. El grupo de edad más susceptible involucrado fue el de los adultos jóvenes (18 a 40 años). Se registró un bajo porcentaje de consumo de alcohol (9,3%) y drogas (2,5%). Las causas más comunes de TMF fueron los accidentes de tránsito (ADT), las caídas y la violencia interpersonal (VIP). La mayoría de las lesiones involucraron tejidos blandos y duros, seguidas de tejidos duros y lesiones abiertas aisladas de tejidos blandos. Entre las fracturas, el tercio medio fue el sitio afectado con mayor frecuencia y el método de tratamiento más utilizado fue la reducción abierta y la fijación interna. Conclusion: Dentro de las limitaciones de la evidencia disponible, este estudio ha demostrado que el género, el estrato etario y los factores etiológicos, como ADT, caídas y VIP , pero no el consumo de alcohol y/o sustancias psicoactivas, pueden tener una influencia significativa en la la prevalencia, los patrones y las modalidades de tratamiento de TMF en esta poblaión muestral.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Criança , Adolescente , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Colômbia/epidemiologia , Fraturas Maxilomandibulares/epidemiologia , Traumatismos Maxilofaciais/terapia , Fraturas Cranianas , Consumo de Bebidas Alcoólicas/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Traumatismos Maxilofaciais
11.
J Craniofac Surg ; 32(7): 2330-2334, 2021 Oct 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34351730

RESUMO

ABSTRACT: The etiology of maxillofacial fractures (MFFs) varies according to the geographical location and density of the population. This study aimed to analyze the etiology, pattern, and treatment of MFFs. Epidemiological characteristics and treatment modalities of MFFs have never been evaluated in Somalia. The study included 45 patients who were operated on for MFFs at a tertiary care hospital in Somalia (2018-2019). Patient demographics, fracture causes, types, associated non-facial injuries, treatment modalities, and hospitalization-time were evaluated. The most common etiological factors of the MFFs were explosion (24.4%) and assault (24.4%), followed by gunshot (22.2%), sports accident (15.6%), motor vehicle accident (11.1%), and fall from height (2.2%) patients, respectively. The main site of injury was the mandible bone (64.4%) followed by nasal bone, maxilla, zygomatic, and orbital region. The most common non-facial injuries of the MFFs were soft tissue laceration (37.8%) followed by femoral fracture (6.7%), clavicle fracture (4.4%), and femoral fracture with chest injuries (2.2%). The most applied treatment was open reduction microplate +/- intermaxillary fixation (77.8%). Due to the size of the mandible fractures, an iliac autograft (6.7%) was performed. The mean length of the hospital stay was 11.8 ±â€Š8.4 days (range, 1-45 days), and some patients (15.6%) needed intensive care due to severe injuries. This will be the first study aiming to analyze the etiology, pattern, and treatment of MFFs in Somalia. This study deals with the social aspects of Somalia, and it shows that MFFs develop as a result of highly interpersonal violence in a young man.


Assuntos
Lacerações , Traumatismos Maxilofaciais , Fraturas Cranianas , Humanos , Masculino , Traumatismos Maxilofaciais/epidemiologia , Traumatismos Maxilofaciais/etiologia , Traumatismos Maxilofaciais/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fraturas Cranianas/epidemiologia , Fraturas Cranianas/etiologia , Fraturas Cranianas/cirurgia , Somália/epidemiologia , Centros de Atenção Terciária
12.
PLoS One ; 16(8): e0255695, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34379643

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Video analysis is one of the most commonly applied methods for analysing football injuries. PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to assess the accuracy of video analysis for recording head injuries in professional football from official matches in the four highest men's professional football leagues in Germany. METHODS: In this cohort study, head injuries detected by means of video analysis of all official matches over one season (2017-18) were compared to head injuries registered with the German statutory accident insurance. RESULTS: Our video analysis yielded 359 head injuries of 287 players. The comparison of head injuries found in our video analysis to those registered with the accident insurance only yielded a match in 23.1% (n = 83), which presents a rather low verification rate. The verification rates varied between the leagues (7.0-30.8%). All injuries documented in the accident insurance registry were found in the video analysis (100%). The types of head injury most often verified by the accident insurance registry (n = 83) were contusion (43.4%), bone fractures (19.3%) and skin lacerations (18.1%). Only 66 of the 359 head injuries (18.4%) resulted in absence from at least one training session and involved a mean time loss of 18.5 days (1-87 days). CONCLUSION: The mismatch between the number of head injuries found in the video analysis and head injuries registered with the accident insurance is an important methodological issue in scientific research. The low verification rate seems to be due to the unclear correlation between injury severity and clinical consequences of head injuries detected by means of video analysis and the failure of football clubs to register minor head injuries with the accident insurance.


Assuntos
Traumatismos em Atletas , Contusões , Traumatismos Craniocerebrais , Seguro de Acidentes , Lacerações , Sistema de Registros , Fraturas Cranianas , Futebol , Adolescente , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Adulto Jovem , Traumatismos em Atletas/epidemiologia , Contusões/epidemiologia , Traumatismos Craniocerebrais/epidemiologia , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Incidência , Lacerações/epidemiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Fraturas Cranianas/epidemiologia , Futebol/lesões , Gravação em Vídeo
13.
Pediatr Emerg Med Pract ; 18(6): 1-28, 2021 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34008934

RESUMO

Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and concussion, a subtype of mTBI, commonly present to the emergency department (ED) and may present with symptoms identical to those associated with more severe TBI. The development and use of clinical decision rules, increased awareness of the risk of radiation associated with head computed tomography, and the potential for patient observation has allowed emergency clinicians to make well-informed decisions regarding the need for imaging for patients who present with mTBI. For patients who present to the ED with concussion, appropriate diagnosis, management, and education are critical for optimal recovery. This issue reviews the most recent literature on concussion and mTBI and provides recommendations for the evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment of mTBI and concussion in the acute setting.


Assuntos
Concussão Encefálica/diagnóstico , Concussão Encefálica/terapia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Adolescente , Traumatismos em Atletas/diagnóstico , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Escala de Coma de Glasgow , Humanos , Lactente , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Masculino , Neuroimagem/métodos , Medicina de Emergência Pediátrica/métodos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Fraturas Cranianas/diagnóstico , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos
14.
ANZ J Surg ; 91(5): 962-968, 2021 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33844452

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The authors aimed to examine the differences in CT facial bone interpretation by the faciomaxillary surgeon and the radiologist, in order to improve communication gaps and subsequently, the quality and consistency of patient care. METHODS: This study was conducted at a level I tertiary trauma centre. Patients with facial trauma who were referred to the faciomaxillary unit following a facial CT examination from August 2017 to September 2018 were eligible for inclusion. The inclusion period was extended to 5 years for panfacial trauma patients. All consecutive patients that fulfilled the study inclusion criteria for each type of injury were included in the study (a total of 120 patients assigned to the following six categories: orbits, skull and skull base, zygomaticomaxillary complex, Le Fort pattern, mandible and pan-facial fractures). Faciomaxillary surgeons, blinded to the radiology report, were asked to provide a verbal description of the fractures. The surgical interpretation was compared to the radiology report and further analysed. RESULTS: Of the 120 cases, the same fractures were reported in 43 cases (35.8%). Both types of specialists noted the predominant and clinically relevant fractures in 106 cases (88.3%). The reports did not match in 14 cases (11.7%) and different terminology was used in 76 cases (63.3%), with agreement in 25% (95% CI: 18-34%), partial agreement in 11.7% (95% CI: 5.9-17.4%) and no agreement in 63.3% (95% CI: 54.7-72.0%) cases. CONCLUSION: Radiologists and faciomaxillary surgeons frequently differ in their assessment of facial fractures.


Assuntos
Fraturas Cranianas , Cirurgiões , Ossos Faciais/diagnóstico por imagem , Ossos Faciais/cirurgia , Humanos , Radiologistas , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fraturas Cranianas/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas Cranianas/cirurgia
15.
Clin Neurol Neurosurg ; 202: 106518, 2021 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33601271

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is frequently found on computed tomography (CT) after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) prompting transfer to centers with neurosurgical coverage and repeat imaging to confirm hemorrhage stability. Studies suggest routine repeat imaging has little utility in patients with minimal ICH, no anticoagulant/antiplatelet use, and no neurological decline. Additionally, it is unclear which mTBI patients benefit from transfer for neurosurgery consultation. The authors sought to assess the clinical utility and cost effectiveness of routine repeat head CTs and transfer to tertiary centers in patients with low-risk, mTBI. METHODS: Retrospective evaluation of patients receiving a neurosurgical consultation for TBI during a 4-year period was performed at a level 1 trauma center. Patients were stratified according to risk for neurosurgical intervention based on their initial clinical evaluation and head CT. Only patients with low-risk, mTBI were included. RESULTS: Of 531 patients, 119 met inclusion criteria. Eighty-eight (74.0 %) received two or more CTs. Direct cost of repeat imaging was $273,374. Thirty-seven (31.1 %) were transferred to our facility from hospitals without neurosurgical coverage, costing $61,384. No patient had neurosurgical intervention or mTBI-related in-hospital mortality despite enlarging ICH on repeat CT in three patients. Two patients had mTBI related 30-day readmission for seizure without ICH expansion. CONCLUSION: Routine repeat head CT or transfer of low-risk, mTBI patients to a tertiary center did not result in neurosurgical intervention. Serial neurological examinations may be a safe, cost-effective alternative to repeat imaging for select mTBI patients. A large prospective analysis is warranted for further evaluation.


Assuntos
Concussão Encefálica/terapia , Hemorragia Intracraniana Traumática/terapia , Neurocirurgia , Transferência de Pacientes/economia , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Fraturas Cranianas/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Concussão Encefálica/diagnóstico por imagem , Concussão Encefálica/economia , Hemorragia Cerebral Traumática/diagnóstico por imagem , Hemorragia Cerebral Traumática/economia , Hemorragia Cerebral Traumática/terapia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Gerenciamento Clínico , Feminino , Hematoma Subdural/diagnóstico por imagem , Hematoma Subdural/economia , Hematoma Subdural/terapia , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Hemorragia Intracraniana Traumática/diagnóstico por imagem , Hemorragia Intracraniana Traumática/economia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Exame Neurológico , Readmissão do Paciente , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fraturas Cranianas/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas Cranianas/economia , Hemorragia Subaracnoídea Traumática/diagnóstico por imagem , Hemorragia Subaracnoídea Traumática/economia , Hemorragia Subaracnoídea Traumática/terapia , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/economia , Centros de Traumatologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
16.
Laryngoscope ; 131(9): 1985-1989, 2021 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33571397

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Over 3 million incidents of facial trauma occur each year in the United States. This study aims to determine trends in operative middle and upper maxillofacial trauma in one of the largest US cities. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case-control study. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of all operative middle and upper maxillofacial trauma from July 1993 to July 2010 presenting to Los Angeles County Hospital, a Level I Trauma Center. Data included demographics, mechanism of injury, and fracture characteristics. RESULTS: Analysis was performed for a total of 4,299 patients and 5,549 facial fractures. Mean patient age was 34.6, and most patients were male (88%). Between the two time periods (1993-2001 and 2002-2010), there was a 42% reduction in operative maxillofacial trauma (3,510 to 2,039). Orbital floor and zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures were the most prevalent types of fractures. Panfacial fractures demonstrated the largest reduction in number of fractures (325 to 5, P<0.01). Assault and motor vehicle accidents (MVA) were the two most common mechanisms of injury. Operative fractures due to MVAs decreased (390 to 214, P = .74), whereas fractures due to assault increased (749 to 800, P<0.01). Compared to adults, pediatric facial trauma (age < 18) were caused by a higher percentage of MVAs (27% vs. 13%), auto versus pedestrian (9% vs. 5%), and gunshot wounds (8% vs. 4%) (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Operative middle and upper maxillofacial trauma decreased over a 17-year period. Assault was the most significant mechanism of trauma overall. These trends suggest that focusing future prevention strategies on curtailing interpersonal violence may more effectively address the burden of facial trauma. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 131:1985-1989, 2021.


Assuntos
Traumatismos Faciais/cirurgia , Traumatismos Maxilofaciais/epidemiologia , Traumatismos Maxilofaciais/cirurgia , Fraturas Cranianas/cirurgia , Acidentes de Trânsito/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Traumatismos Faciais/complicações , Traumatismos Faciais/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Traumatismos Maxilofaciais/etiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fraturas Cranianas/epidemiologia , Fraturas Cranianas/etiologia , Centros de Traumatologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Índices de Gravidade do Trauma , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Violência/prevenção & controle , Violência/estatística & dados numéricos , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo/epidemiologia , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo/prevenção & controle , Adulto Jovem
17.
J Craniofac Surg ; 32(3): 859-862, 2021 May 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32941219

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Most literature regarding traumatic Le Fort or maxillary fractures exists in the adult population, with limited information regarding the epidemiology and management of pediatric fractures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate fracture mechanism, surgical management, and associated injuries in pediatric patients with Le Fort fractures. METHODS: A retrospective chart analysis of all pediatric patients age ≤18 years diagnosed with facial fractures at a single level 1 trauma center over a 10-year period (January 2006-December 2015) was performed. Demographics, fracture location, mechanism of injury, and hospital course were abstracted as well as associated injuries and need for operative management. RESULTS: A total of 1274 patients met inclusion criteria. Sixty-nine (5.4%) presented with Le Fort fractures. Factors associated with Le Fort fractures included motor vehicle collisions (P < 0.001), increased age (P < 0.001), and traumatic brain injury (P < 0.04). Patients with Le Fort fractures were more likely to need intensive care unit admission (P < 0.001), surgical management (P < 0.001), transfusions (P < 0.001), secondary fixation surgery (P < 0.001), and have a longer length of stay (P < 0.001). Multivariate showed increased odds for increased age (OR 1.1; 95%CI 1.04-1.17) and concomitant orbit fractures (OR 8.33; 95%CI 4.08-19.34). Decreased odds were associated for all mechanisms of injury other than motor vehicle collisions (Other blunt trauma: OR 0.36; 95%CI 0.2-0.6. Penetrating trauma: OR 0.13; 95%CI 0.01-0.6). CONCLUSION: Maxillary or Le Fort fractures represent a small portion of pediatric facial fractures but require high rates of operative management. The high velocity required to create this fracture type is associated with significant traumatic comorbidities, which can complicate the hospital course.


Assuntos
Fraturas Maxilares , Fraturas Orbitárias , Fraturas Cranianas , Acidentes de Trânsito , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Humanos , Fraturas Maxilares/epidemiologia , Fraturas Maxilares/cirurgia , Fraturas Orbitárias/epidemiologia , Fraturas Orbitárias/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fraturas Cranianas/epidemiologia , Fraturas Cranianas/cirurgia
18.
Laryngoscope ; 131(1): E278-E282, 2021 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32096886

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To identify which patients with temporal bone fractures who have already undergone trauma pan-scan computed tomography (CT) do not require an additional dedicated temporal bone CT. To determine the added cost of dedicated temporal bone CT in a lower-risk group of patients. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. METHODS: A chart review was conducted of adult patients at a large level I trauma center with temporal bone fractures who underwent both trauma pan-scan CT and dedicated temporal bone CT. Patients were risk stratified into lower- and higher-risk groups based on imaging and physical exam findings. Imaging findings regarding five critical anatomic structures were compared between the two types of CT scans. RESULTS: There were 180 patients who met inclusion criteria, with 120 patients stratified to the lower-risk group. The negative predictive values of trauma pan-scan CT within the lower-risk group for fracture involvement with the five critical anatomic structures were as follows: otic capsule (1.000), carotid canal (0.960), facial nerve canal (1.000), ossicular chain (0.992), and tegmen (0.856). The annual out-of-pocket cost to patients for dedicated temporal bone CT imaging in the lower-risk group was estimated to be approximately $34,000, for a total of $190,000 during the complete study period. CONCLUSIONS: Trauma pan-scan CT may be sufficient in lower-risk patients to identify temporal bone fracture involvement with critical anatomic structures of the temporal bone. Reductions in dedicated temporal bone imaging will decrease both radiation exposure to trauma patients and strain on radiology departments. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 131:E278-E282, 2021.


Assuntos
Fraturas Cranianas/diagnóstico por imagem , Osso Temporal/diagnóstico por imagem , Osso Temporal/lesões , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Gastos em Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/economia , Centros de Traumatologia , Adulto Jovem
19.
Pediatr Emerg Care ; 37(4): 213-217, 2021 Apr 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32868623

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Skull fractures are commonly seen after both accidental and nonaccidental head injuries in young children. A history of recent trauma may be lacking in either an accidental or nonaccidental head injury event. Furthermore, skull fractures do not offer an indication of the stage of healing on radiologic studies because they do not heal with callus formation as seen with long bone fractures. Thus, a better understanding on the timing of skull fracture resolution may provide guidance on the medical evaluation for accidental or nonaccidental head injury. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to determine the time required for radiographic skull fracture resolution in children younger than 24 months. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational analysis of children younger than 24 months referred with skull fractures between January 2008 and December 2012. Analysis included children with accidental head injuries with a known time interval since injury and a negative skeletal survey who underwent serial radiographic studies. Complete healing of a skull fracture was defined as resolution of fracture lucency by radiograph. RESULTS: Of the 26 children who met inclusion criteria, 11 (42.3%) demonstrated resolution of skull fracture(s) on follow-up imaging. Fracture resolution on radiologic studies ranged from 2 to 18 weeks. Twelve fractures in 10 children demonstrated fracture resolution at 10 or more weeks after injury. CONCLUSIONS: Healing or resolution of a skull fracture can take months in children younger than 24 months. With the high variability in skull fracture presentation and large window to fracture resolution, unexplained or multiple skull fractures in children younger than 24 months may be the result of a single or multiple events of head trauma.


Assuntos
Maus-Tratos Infantis , Traumatismos Craniocerebrais , Fraturas Cranianas , Criança , Maus-Tratos Infantis/diagnóstico , Pré-Escolar , Traumatismos Craniocerebrais/diagnóstico por imagem , Consolidação da Fratura , Humanos , Lactente , Estudos Retrospectivos , Crânio , Fraturas Cranianas/diagnóstico por imagem
20.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 147(2): 432-441, 2021 02 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33235039

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Traumatic injuries are significant sources of morbidity and mortality in the pediatric population. Using a national database, this study aims to characterize pediatric facial fracture management and the effect of health care policy changes on populations receiving treatment. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed using Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Kids' Inpatient Database databases from 2000 to 2016. Pediatric patients admitted with a facial fracture diagnosis were included. Clinical outcomes include mortality, reduction of fracture during hospital stay, and open fracture reduction. The impact of the Affordable Care Act on patient demographics and management was assessed. RESULTS: Between 2000 and 2016, 82,414 patients were managed for facial fractures, 8.3 percent of whom were managed after implementation of the Affordable Care Act (n = 6841). Mean age was 15.2 years, and the male-to-female ratio was 2.9:1. Significant racial disparities were identified before the Affordable Care Act: African American and Native American patients had decreased odds of having facial fracture reduction during the initial hospital stay (OR, 0.84 and 0.86, respectively), and identifying as either Hispanic or Native American was associated with higher odds of mortality (OR, 1.4 or 2.4, respectively). Race was not contributory to patient mortality after the Affordable Care Act. Before Affordable Care Act implementation, patients receiving care with no charge (including charity care/charity research) had lower odds of having an open reduction or any reduction; insurance status was not contributory to management after the Affordable Care Act. CONCLUSION: Although the Affordable Care Act may have increased access to care for certain populations, race- and sex-associated differences in mortality rate and fracture management should be further investigated to ensure a national standard of equitable patient care.


Assuntos
Ossos Faciais/lesões , Política de Saúde , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/economia , Fraturas Cranianas/cirurgia , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Bases de Dados Factuais/estatística & dados numéricos , Ossos Faciais/cirurgia , Feminino , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/economia , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/tendências , Mortalidade Hospitalar/tendências , Humanos , Cobertura do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Tempo de Internação/tendências , Masculino , Grupos Minoritários/estatística & dados numéricos , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/estatística & dados numéricos , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/tendências , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fraturas Cranianas/economia , Fraturas Cranianas/mortalidade , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA