National Trends in Pediatric Facial Fractures: The Impact of Health Care Policy.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic injuries are significant sources of morbidity and mortality in the pediatric population. Using a national database, this study aims to characterize pediatric facial fracture management and the effect of health care policy changes on populations receiving treatment. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed using Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Kids' Inpatient Database databases from 2000 to 2016. Pediatric patients admitted with a facial fracture diagnosis were included. Clinical outcomes include mortality, reduction of fracture during hospital stay, and open fracture reduction. The impact of the Affordable Care Act on patient demographics and management was assessed. RESULTS: Between 2000 and 2016, 82,414 patients were managed for facial fractures, 8.3 percent of whom were managed after implementation of the Affordable Care Act (n = 6841). Mean age was 15.2 years, and the male-to-female ratio was 2.9:1. Significant racial disparities were identified before the Affordable Care Act: African American and Native American patients had decreased odds of having facial fracture reduction during the initial hospital stay (OR, 0.84 and 0.86, respectively), and identifying as either Hispanic or Native American was associated with higher odds of mortality (OR, 1.4 or 2.4, respectively). Race was not contributory to patient mortality after the Affordable Care Act. Before Affordable Care Act implementation, patients receiving care with no charge (including charity care/charity research) had lower odds of having an open reduction or any reduction; insurance status was not contributory to management after the Affordable Care Act. CONCLUSION: Although the Affordable Care Act may have increased access to care for certain populations, race- and sex-associated differences in mortality rate and fracture management should be further investigated to ensure a national standard of equitable patient care.

Predictors of mortality, hospital utilization, and the role of race in outcomes in head and neck trauma.

OBJECTIVE: A retrospective cross-sectional analysis was undertaken to determine the impact of race and insurance status on trauma outcomes in patients admitted to a Level I trauma center following head and neck fractures. STUDY DESIGN: Putative predictive factors, including injury mechanism, hemorrhagic shock, injury severity score (ISS), race, gender, and insurance status, were used in a multivariate outcome analysis to determine their influence on length of hospital stay, number of procedures performed, discharge status, and mortality; P < .05 was significant. RESULTS: Proportionately more male patients (76.5%) sustained head and neck fractures compared with females (23.5%). Blacks and Hispanics sustained proportionately more gunshot wounds (GSWs) compared with Whites, 16:1 and 7:1, respectively. There were no significant differences in length of hospital stay and mortality based on race or insurance status. Mortality was related to age, GSW as a mechanism of injury, increasing ISS, and shock on admission. CONCLUSIONS: Minority race and insurance status did not correlate with worse outcomes. Treatment biases in the acutely injured patient with head and neck injuries may be less prevalent than thought, if we consider mortality and utilization of care as primary outcome measures.

Impact of facial fractures and intracranial injuries on hospitalization outcomes following firearm injuries.

IMPORTANCE: Firearm injuries (FAIs) play a major role in unintentional injuries, suicides, and homicides. It is important that policy makers, public health authorities, physicians, and the public are kept abreast of current trends in FAIs so that preventive programs can be tailored to the needs of cohorts that are at highest risk for such injuries. OBJECTIVES: To provide nationally representative longitudinal estimates of outcomes associated with hospitalizations attributed to FAIs in all age groups in the United States during the years 2003 to 2010; to obtain prevalence estimates of skull and/or facial fractures and intracranial injuries among those hospitalized owing to firearm injuries; and to examine the association between the occurrence of skull and/or facial fractures and/or intracranial injuries and in-hospital mortality. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this retrospective analysis of the largest all-payer hospitalization data set in the United States, we evaluate a Nationwide Inpatient Sample of patients hospitalized for FAIs during the years 2003 to 2010. EXPOSURES: Face and/or skull fracture and/or intracranial injuries due to firearm injuries. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The main outcome of interest was in-hospital mortality. The primary independent variables included occurrence of face and/or skull fracture and/or intracranial injuries. RESULTS During the study period, 252,181 visits were attributed to FAIs. Adolescents and young adults accounted for nearly 80% of all hospitalizations, with more than half of these in the 18- to 29-year-old, high-risk group. Male patients consistently accounted for 89% of the hospitalizations. The uninsured population accounted for nearly a third of hospitalizations. A total of 214,221 FAI hospitalizations did not involve facial and/or skull fractures or intracranial injuries; 13,090 involved a facial and/or skull fracture without a concomitant intracranial injury; 20,453 involved an intracranial injury without a concomitant facial and/or skull fracture; and 4417 involved both a facial and/or skull fracture and intracranial injury. Those with intracranial injuries without concomitant facial and/or skull fractures (odds ratio [OR], 58.40; 95% CI, 50.08-68.11) (P < .001) and those with both facial and/or skull fractures and intracranial injuries (OR, 17.45; 95% CI, 13.98-21.79) (P < .001) were associated with higher odds of in-hospital mortality than those without these injuries. Teaching hospitals were associated with higher odds of in-hospital mortality than nonteaching hospitals (OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.14-1.49) (P < .001). Teaching hospitals also tended to treat a higher proportion of complex cases. The uninsured had higher odds of in-hospital mortality than those with private insurance (OR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.35-1.78). CONCLUSIONS: AND RELEVANCE Occurrence of intracranial injuries was an independent risk factor for poor outcomes. Teaching hospitals had higher mortality rates but also treated more complex cases than nonteaching hospitals.

Trainee misinterpretations on pediatric neuroimaging studies: classification, imaging analysis, and outcome assessment.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The scope of trainee misinterpretations on pediatric neuroimaging studies has been incompletely assessed. Our aim was to evaluate the frequency of trainee misinterpretations on neuroimaging exams in children, describe a useful classification system, and assess related patient management or outcome changes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pediatric neuroimaging examinations with trainee-dictated reports performed without initial attending radiologist assessment were evaluated for discrepant trainee interpretations by using a search of the RIS. The frequency of discrepant trainee interpretations was calculated and classified on the basis of the type of examination on which the error occurred, the specific type and severity of the discrepancy, and the effect on patient management and outcome. Differences relating to examination type and level of training were also assessed. RESULTS: There were 143 discrepancies on 3496 trainee-read examinations for a discrepancy rate of 4.1%. Most occurred on CT examinations (131; 92%). Most discrepancies (75) were minor but were related to the clinical presentation. Six were major and potentially life-threatening. Thirty-seven were overcalls. Most had no effect on clinical management (97, 68%) or resulted simply in clinical reassessment or imaging follow-up (43, 30%). There was no permanent morbidity or mortality related to the misinterpretations. The most common misinterpretations were related to fractures (28) and ICH (23). CT examinations of the face, orbits, and neck had the highest discrepancy rate (9.4%). Third- and fourth-year residents had a larger discrepancy rate than fellows. CONCLUSIONS: Trainee misinterpretations occur in 4.1% of pediatric neuroimaging examinations with only a small number being life-threatening (0.17%). Detailed analysis of the types of misinterpretations can be used to inform proactive trainee education.

[Epidemiology and management in emergency room patients with maxillofacial fractures]. / Epidemiologie und Behandlungsmanagement bei Schockraumpatienten mit Gesichtsschädelverletzungen.

OBJECTIVE: To minimize overall mortality and optimise reconstructive and cosmetic outcome in severely injured patients with maxillofacial injuries the interdisciplinary coordination of several surgical disciplines is required. It is still discussed controversy whether patients with maxillofacial fractures benefit from early fracture repair or if delayed operative management also yields in good results. METHODS: Herein we analysed the data of 1252 severely injured patients between May 1998 through June 2002 in our trauma department regarding fractures of the maxillofacial region, injury severity, length of ICU stay and postoperative complications in patients with either early (within 72 hours) or delayed ( > 3 days) facial fracture repair. RESULTS: 147 patients had severe facial fractures. Average age was 39.8 years (3-87 years), mean ICU was 25 (+/- 16) and the overall mortality 12% (n = 18). The most common cause for the injuries were traffic accidents in 45%. 78 patients (53%) underwent surgical repair of the maxillofacial fractures; 18 patients had early fracture repair and 60 patients had delayed operative repair. We found 4 complications (22%) in the early repair group and 13 local complications (21%) in the group with delayed surgical repair. CONCLUSION: Delayed repair of maxillofacial injuries in severely injured patients is feasible and yields in good results compared to early fracture repair.

Epidemiology and prevention of fatal head injuries in Germany--trends and the impact of the reunification.

UNLABELLED: A review of the data published on the epidemiology of traumatic brain injuries (TBI) reveals that the data of almost all studies are drawn from local or regional series. Nationwide data are rarely available, or are extrapolated from regional data. In Germany, there has been a nationwide mortality register with ICD-9-coded diagnoses since 1968. In addition, it has been compulsory since 1994 that all hospitals in Germany provide ICD-9 data on all admissions and discharges. Based on data provided by the Federal Bureau of Statistics (Statistisches Bundesamt) in Wiesbaden, all head injuries between 1972 and 1998 were analyzed according to ICD-9 and after 1998 according to the updated ICD-10. The data of hospitalized cases and fatal cases were correlated with population data to calculate incidences and mortality rates. Age-group specific data were also available and analyzed. Head injuries in Germany accounted in 1998 for 19.59% of all injuries. The incidence is 337/100,000. The incidence rate of serious head injury is 33.5/100,000. Mortality decreased continuously from 27.2/100,000 in 1972 to 9.0/100,000 in 2000. The mortality is highest in the group older than 75 years. 68.4% of persons with head injury die before admission to a hospital. After the reunification in 1989/1990, the number of fatal head injuries showed a temporary increase. The number of patients treated in-hospital remained essentially unchanged (276/564 patients in 1998). The majority of hospitalized patients suffered minor head injury. CONCLUSION: Analysis of the admission/discharge data of all German hospitals reveals surprising inside views of age group-related incidence and mortality rates of head injuries in this country. Future research should be focused on patients with minor head injuries who account for nearly 200,000 cases of in-hospital treatment.

Assessment of mortality associated with mild head injury in the pediatric age group.

Reducing mortality among accident and trauma patients requires careful attention to monitoring those regarded as being at low risk. We hospitalized almost 1600 head-injured patients in the period between 1979 and 1992 at the Neurosurgery Department of Gazi University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey. These patients were selected from among the numerous patients admitted to our emergency unit and treated with the same protocol in the same department. Among the hospitalized children, there were three patients defined as having a mild head injury on the basis of Glasgow Coma Scale scores of 15 who later had unfavorable outcomes. Clinical signs that might identify potentially endangered patients with mild injury were gathered; these included the presence of post-traumatic amnesia, somnolence, irritability, anisocoria, local evidence of trauma to the head, associated injuries, history of altered consciousness, and skull fracture. The study was designed to identify features by which patients who are in real danger can be distinguished among the many with trivial trauma that we face every day. We did not find any identifying clinical features and concluded that computed tomographic scanning is the only reliable answer. This will reduce avoidable mortality and morbidity by identifying the patients who are at higher risk than is at first evident.