Risk assessment of femoral pathological fracture in prostate cancer patients by computed tomography analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Prostate cancer often forms osteoblastic lesions that appear as a high-dense shadow upon X-ray. Although the lesions may seem to increase bone strength, pathological fracture occurs in one in four patients with prostate cancer. The aim of this study is to elucidate the factors that may increase the risk of pathological fracture in patients with prostate cancer metastases in the proximal femur by analyzing computed tomography data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Computed tomography data of the femur of 62 prostate cancer patients were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into three groups based on the presence or absence of femoral metastatic lesions and pathological fracture. Surgical specimens of the proximal femur collected from patients who had a pathological fracture were histologically analyzed. RESULTS: Bone density in the marrow area was increased in all cases with metastases compared with those with no metastases. Contrarily, the cortical bone density at the medial trochanter region was significantly lower in patients who had pathological fractures in the proximal femur than those who did not. Accordingly, histological analysis of the surgical specimens revealed that the affected cortical bone was osteopenic without any apparent new bone formation. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that prostate cancer is less effective in inducing bone formation in the cortex than in the marrow and that the decrease in the cortical bone density at the medial trochanter region leads to an increased risk of pathological fracture. Therefore, a previously undocumented risk factor for pathological fracture in prostate cancer patients is presented.

Burden of skeletal-related events in prostate cancer: unmet need in pain improvement.

PURPOSE: Up to 75% of patients with prostate cancer experience metastatic bone disease, which leads to an increased risk for skeletal-related events (SREs) including pathological bone fracture, spinal cord compression, and hypercalcemia of malignancy. Our objective was to systematically review the literature on the impact of SREs on quality of life (QOL), morbidity, and survival with a primary focus on the impact of SREs on pain in prostate cancer patients. METHODS: We searched PubMed, limiting to peer-reviewed English-language human studies published in 2000-2010. The search was based on the US Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency definition of an SRE, which includes pathologic fracture, spinal cord compression (SCC), hypercalcemia of malignancy, and radiotherapy or surgery to bone resulting from severe bone pain. RESULTS: A total of 209 articles were screened, of which 173 were excluded, and 36 were included in this review. Patients with SREs had more pain and worse survival compared with no SREs. Pathologic bone fractures worsened QOL and were associated with shorter survival. Radiation therapy of SCC alleviated pain and improved morbidity. SCC was associated with decreases in patient survival. Radiation therapy and surgery to bone improved pain. CONCLUSIONS: Specific SREs are associated with worse outcomes, including increased pain, poorer QOL, morbidity, and survival. Treatment of SREs is associated with improved pain, although there remains a need for more effective treatment of SREs in prostate cancer patients.

Metastatic bone disease in the era of bone-targeted therapy: clinical impact.

Advances in the diagnosis and treatment of tumors by surgery, chemotherapy, biotherapy, radiotherapy and other modalities have increased the survival of cancer patients over the last 20 years. As a consequence, bone now represents the third most common site of metastatic involvement after the lung and liver. Approximately 20-25% of patients with neoplastic disease develop clinically evident bone metastases (BMs) during the natural course of their illness, with a further 50% of such lesions being identified during autopsy. BMs are the major cause of morbidity in cancer patients because of their epidemiological and clinical impact. Pain is the most frequent symptom in about 75% of patients but other serious complications can also occur, such as pathological fractures, spinal cord compression, hypercalcemia and bone marrow suppression. These complications worsen the patient's general condition and reduce patients' mobility, facilitating the development of lung infections, skin ulcers, deep vein thrombosis, etc., and ultimately reducing prognosis and quality of life. The frequency of serious complications depends on the site and type of lesions and the treatment administered. Over the last 10 years, the introduction of bisphosphonates for the treatment of patients with BMs has led to a marked decrease in the frequency of complications, thus improving quality of life and clinical outcome. Furthermore, progress in understanding the pathophysiology of bone metastases has resulted in the development of new bone-targeted molecules such as denosumab. We therefore felt it would be useful to report on the epidemiological, clinical and economic impact of bone disease in a cancer setting.

Two-year cost comparison of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty for the treatment of vertebral compression fractures: are initial surgical costs misleading?

UNLABELLED: The costs for treating kypho- and vertebroplasty patients were evaluated at up to 2 years postsurgery. There were no significant differences in adjusted costs in the first 9 months postsurgery, but kyphoplasty patients were associated with significantly lower adjusted treatment costs by 6.8-7.9% in the remaining periods through 2 years postsurgery. INTRODUCTION: Vertebral augmentation has been shown to be safe and effective for treating vertebral compression fractures. Comparative cost studies of initial treatment costs for kypho- and vertebroplasty have been mixed. The purpose of our study was to compare the costs for treating kypho- and vertebroplasty patients at up to 2 years postsurgery. METHODS: Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty patients diagnosed with pathologic or closed lumbar/thoracic vertebral fractures were identified from the 5% sample of the Medicare dataset (2006-2009). The final study cohort with at least 2 years follow-up comprised of 1,609 vertebroplasty and 2,878 kyphoplasty patients. The cumulative treatment costs (adjusted to June 2011 US$) were determined from the payer perspective. Differences in costs and length of stay were assessed by generalized linear mixed model regression, adjusting for covariates. RESULTS: The average adjusted costs for vertebroplasty patients within the first quarter and the first 2 years postsurgery were $14,585 [95% confidence interval (CI), $14,109-15,078] and $44,496 (95% CI, $42,763-46,299), respectively. The corresponding average adjusted costs for kyphoplasty patients were $15,117 (95% CI, $14,752-15,491) and $41,339 (95% CI, $40,154-42,560). There were no significant differences in adjusted costs in the first 9 months postsurgery, but kyphoplasty patients were associated with significantly lower adjusted treatment costs by 6.8-7.9% in the remaining periods through 2 years postsurgery. CONCLUSION: Our present study addresses some of the limitations in previous comparative cost studies of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. The higher adjusted costs for vertebroplasty patients than kyphoplasty patients by 1 year following the surgery reflect greater utilization of medical resources.

Lumbar spinal stenosis assessment with computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and myelography.

Degenerative spinal stenosis of the lumbar spine is caused by many factors, some of which include: disc herniation, ligamentum flavum and facet hypertrophy, spondylolisthesis, and compression fracture. Most often the stenosis is caused by a combination of these factors. The imaging modalities in routine use to evaluate these conditions are computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography-myelogram. They each have their advantages and disadvantages although any one of these modalities can adequately diagnose lumbar stenosis. The overall accuracy rate of computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and computed tomography-myelogram has been reported to be similar and even complimentary. It is recommended that the least invasive modality be performed first. Magnetic resonance imaging should be the first choice because it does not require ionizing radiation or contrast injection. The aim of the current study is to present the common causes of lumbar stenosis. Where appropriate, each case is shown with images from each modality so that their similarities and differences can be highlighted.