Prospective assessment of the impact of intraoperative diuretics in kidney transplant recipient surgery.

BACKGROUND: The use of intraoperative diuretics, such as furosemide or mannitol, during kidney transplantation has been suggested to reduce the rate of delayed graft function (DGF). The evidence base for this is sparse, however, and there is substantial variation in practice. We sought to evaluate whether the use of intraoperative diuretics during kidney transplantation translated into a reduction in DGF. METHODS: We conducted a cohort study evaluating the use of furosemide or mannitol given intraoperatively before kidney reperfusion compared with control (no diuretic). Adult patients receiving a kidney transplant for end-stage renal disease were allocated to receive furosemide, mannitol, or no diuretic. The primary outcome was DGF; secondary outcomes were graft function at 30 days and perioperative changes in potassium levels. Descriptive and comparative statistics were used where appropriate. RESULTS: A total of 162 patients who received a kidney transplant from a deceased donor (either donation after neurologic determination of death or donation after circulatory death) were included over a 2-year period, with no significant between-group differences. There was no significant difference in DGF rates between the furosemide, mannitol, and control groups. When the furosemide and mannitol groups were pooled (any diuretic use) and compared with the control group, however, there was a significant improvement in the odds that patients would be free of DGF (odds ratio 2.10, 95% confidence interval 1.06-4.16, 26% v. 44%, p = 0.03). There were no significant differences noted in any secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION: This study suggests the use of an intraoperative diuretic (furosemide or mannitol) may result in a reduction in DGF in patients undergoing kidney transplantation. Further study in the form of a randomized controlled trial is warranted.

Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation From Donors With Acute Kidney Injury: Realities and Costs.

OBJECTIVES: Transplant of kidneys from donors with acute kidney injury has shown favorable outcomes. We investigated the outcomes of kidney transplant recipients with deceased donors who developed acute kidney injury before organ procurement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of recipients from January 2016 to December 2021 in a single center. Outcomes in recipients of kidney grafts from donors with and without acute kidney injury were compared. RESULTS: The mean follow-up time was 40 months. Our study included 129 (34%) kidneys transplanted from donors with acute kidney injury and 251 (66%) kidneys from donors without acute kidney injury. Delayed graft function rate in recipients was 33% in the acute kidney injury group and 25.5% in the group without acute kidney injury (P = .099). Readmission rate at 30 days was significantly higher among recipients of kidneys with acute kidney injury compared with recipients of kidneys without acute kidney injury (45% vs 33.5%; P = .02). The mean overall costs of transplant in the acute kidney injury group were comparable to the group without acute kidney injury ($253 865 vs $253 611; P = .97). The acute rejection rate was comparable between the 2 groups (4% in both groups; P = .96). Delayed graft function rate was increased with increased stage of acute kidney injury (18% stage 1, 45% stage 2, 36% stage 3; P = .03). However, the overall length of hospital stay and costs were comparable among recipients of different stages of acute kidney injury. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that kidney transplants from donors with acute kidney injury have early and late outcomes comparable to kidney transplants from donors without acute kidney injury. Allografts from donors with acute kidney injury can be used safely and can expand the donor pool in kidney transplant without increasing perioperative resource utilization.

Early Assessment of National Kidney Allocation Policy Change.

BACKGROUND: The new kidney allocation changes with elimination of donor service areas (DSAs) and Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network regions were initiated to improve equity in organ allocation. The aim of this evaluation was to determine the operational, financial, and recipient-related effect of the new allocation system on a large rural transplantation program. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of organ offers, allograft outcomes, and attributed costs in a comparative time cohort, before (December 16, 2020 to March 14, 2021) and after (March 15, 2021 to June 13, 2021) the allocation change was performed. Outcomes were limited to adult, solitary, deceased donor kidney transplantations. RESULTS: We received 198,881 organ offers from 3,886 organ donors at our transplantation center from December 16, 2020 to June 31, 2021: 87,643 (1,792 organ donors) before the change and 111,238 (2094 organ donors) after the change, for a difference of +23,595 more offers (+302 organ donors). This resulted in 6.5 more organs transplanted vs a predicted loss of 4.9 per month. Local organ offers dropped from 70% to 23%. There was a statistically significantly increase in donor terminal serum creatinine (1.2 ± 0.86 mg/dL vs 2.2 ± 2.3 mg/dL, p < 0.001), kidney donor profile index (KDPI) (39 ± 20 vs 48 ± 22, p = 0.017), cold ischemia time (16 ± 7 hours vs 21 ± 6 hours, p < 0.001), and delayed graft function rates (23% vs 40%, p = 0.020). CONCLUSION: The new kidney allocation policy has led to an increase in KDPI of donors with longer cold ischemia time, leading to higher delayed graft function rates. This has resulted in increasing logistical and financial burdens on the system. Implementing large-scale changes in allocation based predominantly on predictive modeling needs to be intensely reassessed during a longer follow up.

Quantitative Assessment of Intraoperative Laser Fluorescence Angiography With Indocyanine Green Predicts Early Graft Function After Kidney Transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to demonstrate the predictive ability of quantitative indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence angiography for the short-term postoperative outcome, the occurrence of delayed graft function (DGF), and long-term graft survival. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: DGF is a relevant problem after kidney transplantation; sufficient microperfusion of the allograft is crucial for postoperative organ function. Fluorescence angiography with ICG can serve as an intraoperative quality control of microperfusion. METHODS: This prospective diagnostic study, conducted in 2 German transplantation centers from November 2015 to October 2018, included 128 consecutive kidney transplantations. Intraoperative assessment of the allograft microperfusion was performed by near-infrared fluorescence angiography with ICG; a software was used for quantitative analysis. The associations between perfusion parameters (eg, ICG Ingress) and donor, recipient, peri-procedural, and postoperative characteristics were evaluated. RESULTS: DGF occurred in 23 (24%) kidney recipients from deceased donors. ICG Ingress ( P = 0.0027), donor age ( P = 0.0452), recipient age ( P = 0.0139), and recipient body mass index ( P = 0.0017) were associated with DGF. ICG Ingress correlated significantly with recipient age (r = -0.27662, P = 0.0016), cold and warm ischemia time (r = -0.25204, P = 0.0082; r = -0.19778, P = 0.0283), operating time (r = -0.32208, P = 0.0002), eGFR on postoperative days 1 (r =+0.22674, P = 0.0104) and 7 (r = +0.33189, P = 0.0001). The cutoff value for ICG Ingress was 106.23 AU with sensitivity of 78.3% and specificity of 80.8% ( P < 0.0001) for the prediction of DGF. CONCLUSION: Fluorescence angiography with ICG allows intraoperative quantitative assessment of microperfusion during kidney transplantation. The parameter ICG Ingress reflects recipient and procedure characteristics and is able to predict the incidence of DGF. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT-02775838.

Racial Disparities in Pediatric Kidney Transplantation under the New Kidney Allocation System in the United States.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In December 2014, the Kidney Allocation System (KAS) was implemented to improve equity in access to transplantation, but preliminary studies in children show mixed results. Thus, we aimed to assess how the 2014 KAS policy change affected racial and ethnic disparities in pediatric kidney transplantation access and related outcomes. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of children <18 years of age active on the kidney transplant list from 2008 to 2019 using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. Log-logistic accelerated failure time models were used to determine the time from first activation on the transplant list and the time on dialysis to deceased donor transplant, each with KAS era or race and ethnicity as the exposure of interest. We used logistic regression to assess odds of delayed graft function. Log-rank tests assessed time to graft loss within racial and ethnic groups across KAS eras. RESULTS: All children experienced longer wait times from activation to transplantation post-KAS. In univariable analysis, Black and Hispanic children and other children of color experienced longer times from activation to transplant compared with White children in both eras; this finding was largely attenuated after multivariable analysis (time ratio, 1.16; 95% confidence interval, 1.01 to 1.32; time ratio, 1.13; 95% confidence interval, 1.00 to 1.28; and time ratio, 1.17; 95% confidence interval, 0.96 to 1.41 post-KAS, respectively). Multivariable analysis also showed that racial and ethnic disparities in time from dialysis initiation to transplantation in the pre-KAS era were mitigated in the post-KAS era. There were no disparities in odds of delayed graft function. Black and Hispanic children experienced longer times with a functioning graft in the post-KAS era. CONCLUSIONS: No racial and ethnic disparities from activation to deceased donor transplantation were seen before or after implementation of the KAS in multivariable analysis, whereas time on dialysis to transplantation and odds of short-term graft loss improved in equity after the implementation of the KAS, without compromising disparities in delayed graft function. PODCAST: This article contains a podcast at https://www.asn-online.org/media/podcast/CJASN/2021_12_07_CJN06740521.mp3.

Comparative analysis of kidney transplant costs related to recovery of renal function after the procedure / Análise comparativa dos custos do transplante renal relacionados à recuperação da função renal após o procedimento

Abstract Introduction: The number of kidney transplants (KTx) is increasing in Brazil and, consequently, the costs of this procedure increase the country's health budget. We retrospectively evaluated the data of kidney transplant procedures until hospital discharge, according to kidney function recovery after the procedure. Methods: Retrospective analysis of the non-sensitized, 1st KTx from deceased donors performed between Jan/2010 to Dec/2017. Results: Out of the 1300 KTx from deceased donors performed in this period, 730 patients were studied and divided into 3 groups: Immediate Renal Function (IRF) - decrease in serum creatinine ≥ 10% on two consecutive days; Delayed Graft Function (DGF) - decrease in serum creatinine <10% on two consecutive days, without the need for dialysis, and Dialysis (D) - need for dialysis during the first week. Patients in group D stayed longer in the hospital compared to DGF and IRF (21, 11 and 8 days respectively, p < 0.001). More D patients (21%) were admitted to the ICU and performed a greater number of laboratory tests (p < 0.001) and renal biopsies (p < 0.001), in addition to receiving a higher amount of immunosuppressants. Total hospital costs were higher in group D and DGF compared to IRF (U$ 7.021,48; U$ 3.603,42 and U$ 2.642,37 respectively, p < 0.001). Conclusion: The costs of the transplant procedure is impacted by the recovery of kidney function after the transplant. The reimbursement for each of these different kidney function outcomes should be individualized in order to cover their real costs.

Resumo Introdução: O número de transplantes renais (KTx, do inglês kidney transplant) está aumentando no Brasil e, consequentemente, os custos deste procedimento aumentam o orçamento de saúde do país. Avaliamos retrospectivamente dados dos procedimentos de transplantes renais até a alta hospitalar, de acordo com a recuperação da função renal após o procedimento. Métodos: Análise retrospectiva dos 1º KTx de doadores falecidos, não sensibilizados, realizados entre Jan/2010 a Dez/2017. Resultados: Dos 1300 KTx de doadores falecidos realizados neste período, 730 pacientes foram estudados e divididos em 3 grupos: Função Renal Imediata (FRI) - diminuição na creatinina sérica ≥ 10% em dois dias consecutivos; Função Retardada do Enxerto (FRE) - diminuição na creatinina sérica <10% em dois dias consecutivos, sem necessidade de diálise, e Diálise (D) - necessidade de diálise durante a primeira semana. Pacientes no grupo D permaneceram mais tempo no hospital em comparação com FRE e FRI (21, 11 e 8 dias dias respectivamente, p < 0,001). Mais pacientes do grupo D (21%) foram admitidos na UTI e realizaram um maior número de testes laboratoriais (p < 0,001) e biópsias renais (p < 0,001), além de receberem uma quantidade maior de imunossupressores. Os custos hospitalares totais foram mais elevados nos grupos D e FRE em comparação com FRI (U$ 7.021,48; U$ 3.603,42 e U$ 2.642,37 respectivamente, p < 0,001). Conclusão: Os custos do procedimento de transplante são impactados pela recuperação da função renal após o transplante. O reembolso para cada um desses diferentes desfechos da função renal deve ser individualizado a fim de cobrir seus custos reais.

Indocyanine Green Angiography for Quality Assessment of the Kidney During Transplantation: An Outcome Predictor Prospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Microvascular damage is the main cause of delayed graft function (DGF) after kidney transplant. Assessing its extent may be helpful in predicting DGF to achieve better postoperative management, especially in terms of an immunosuppressive regimen. Our aim was to explore the capability of intraoperative indocyanine green (ICG) angiography to examine the microvasculature of the kidney. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study on 37 kidney transplant recipients in a high-volume kidney transplant center. During surgery, after graft implant, an ICG angiography was performed through a high-definition Storz camera system (Karl Storz GmbH, Tuttlingen, Germany) with successive quantitative assessment of fluorescence using Icy bioimage analysis. RESULTS: All transplanted kidneys that showed immediate recovery of their function had a fluorescent intensity ≥49.953 with a mean of 96.930 ± 21. The fluorescence intensity for kidneys that showed a delayed recovery of their function never exceeded 55.648, and the mean was 37.718 ± 13. The difference between the 2 groups was statistically significant with a P value < .001. The only kidney that never recovered showed a fluorescence intensity consistently <25.220, the lowest detected. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that intraoperative ICG angiography may be used to assess the microvasculature of the graft. A statistically significant difference in terms of fluorescent intensity can be highlighted between kidneys that immediately recover their function and those with delayed recovery. Further larger studies are needed to confirm the capability of the technique to predict DGF to optimize the transplanted patients' management.

Comparative analysis of kidney transplant costs related to recovery of renal function after the procedure.

INTRODUCTION: The number of kidney transplants (KTx) is increasing in Brazil and, consequently, the costs of this procedure increase the country's health budget. We retrospectively evaluated the data of kidney transplant procedures until hospital discharge, according to kidney function recovery after the procedure. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of the non-sensitized, 1st KTx from deceased donors performed between Jan/2010 to Dec/2017. RESULTS: Out of the 1300 KTx from deceased donors performed in this period, 730 patients were studied and divided into 3 groups: Immediate Renal Function (IRF) - decrease in serum creatinine ≥ 10% on two consecutive days; Delayed Graft Function (DGF) - decrease in serum creatinine <10% on two consecutive days, without the need for dialysis, and Dialysis (D) - need for dialysis during the first week. Patients in group D stayed longer in the hospital compared to DGF and IRF (21, 11 and 8 days respectively, p < 0.001). More D patients (21%) were admitted to the ICU and performed a greater number of laboratory tests (p < 0.001) and renal biopsies (p < 0.001), in addition to receiving a higher amount of immunosuppressants. Total hospital costs were higher in group D and DGF compared to IRF (U$ 7.021,48; U$ 3.603,42 and U$ 2.642,37 respectively, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The costs of the transplant procedure is impacted by the recovery of kidney function after the transplant. The reimbursement for each of these different kidney function outcomes should be individualized in order to cover their real costs.

Viability assessment and utilization of declined donor kidneys with rhabdomyolysis using ex vivo normothermic perfusion without preimplantation biopsy.

The role of ex vivo normothermic perfusion (EVNP) in both organ viability assessment and reconditioning is increasingly being demonstrated. We report the use of this emerging technology to facilitate the transplantation of a pair of donor kidneys with severe acute kidney injury (AKI) secondary to rhabdomyolysis. Donor creatinine was 10.18 mg/dl with protein (30 mg/dl) present in urinalysis. Both kidneys were declined by all other transplantation units and subsequently accepted by our unit. The first kidney was perfused with red cell-based perfusate at 37°C for 75 min, mean renal blood flow was 110 ml/min/100 g and produced 85 ml of urine. Having demonstrated favorable macroscopic appearance and urine output, the kidney was transplanted into a 61-year-old peritoneal dialysis dependent without complication. Given the reassuring information from the first kidney provided by EVNP, the second kidney was not perfused with EVNP and was directly implanted to a 64-year-old patient. The first kidney achieved primary function and the second functioned well after delayed graft function. Recipient eGFR have stabilized at 88.5 and 55.3, respectively (ml/min/1.73 m2 ), at 2 months posttransplant.

A Single-Center Assessment of Delayed Graft Function in Recipients of Simultaneous Liver and Kidney Transplant.

BACKGROUND: The effects of delayed graft function on long-term kidney allograft outcomes are poorly defined among simultaneous liver and kidney transplant recipients. METHODS: We analyzed data of all simultaneous liver and kidney recipients transplanted at the University of Wisconsin between 2010 and 2017. Risk factors for the development of delayed graft function, kidney graft failure, and patient mortality were outcomes of interest. RESULTS: There were a total of 60 simultaneous liver and kidney recipients; 28 (47%) had delayed graft function. After adjustment for multiple variables, we found that pretransplant dialysis >6 weeks (hazard ratio [HR] = 5.6, 95% CI: 1.23-25.59, P = .02), pretransplant albumin <3 g/dL (HR = 5.75, 95% CI: 1.76-16.94, P = .003), and presence of pretransplant diabetes (HR = 2.5, 95% CI: 0.97-4.77, P = .05) were significantly associated with delayed graft function. Multivariate analysis showed that pretransplant albumin <3 (HR = 4.86, 95% CI: 1.07-22.02, P = .02) was associated with a higher risk of all-cause kidney allograft failure, whereas the duration of delayed graft function (HR = 1.07 per day, 95% CI: 1.01-1.14, P = .01) was associated with a higher risk of death-censored kidney allograft failure. The presence of delayed graft function was not associated with all-cause or death-censored kidney or liver allograft failure. Similarly, the presence of delayed graft function was not associated with patient mortality. CONCLUSION: The incidence of delayed graft function was high in simultaneous liver and kidney recipients. However, with appropriate management, delayed graft function may not have a negative impact on patient or kidney allograft survival.

Assessment of Organ Quality in Kidney Transplantation by Molecular Analysis and Why It May Not Have Been Achieved, Yet.

Donor organ shortage, growing waiting lists and substantial organ discard rates are key problems in transplantation. The critical importance of organ quality in determining long-term function is becoming increasingly clear. However, organ quality is difficult to predict. The lack of good measures of organ quality is a serious challenge in terms of acceptance and allocation of an organ. The underlying review summarizes currently available methods used to assess donor organ quality such as histopathology, clinical scores and machine perfusion characteristics with special focus on molecular analyses of kidney quality. The majority of studies testing molecular markers of organ quality focused on identifying organs at risk for delayed graft function, yet without prediction of long-term graft outcome. Recently, interest has emerged in looking for molecular markers associated with biological age to predict organ quality. However, molecular gene sets have not entered the clinical routine or impacted discard rates so far. The current review critically discusses the potential reasons why clinically applicable molecular quality assessment using early kidney biopsies might not have been achieved yet. Besides a critical analysis of the inherent limitations of surrogate markers used for organ quality, i.e., delayed graft function, the intrinsic methodological limitations of studies assessing organ quality will be discussed. These comprise the multitude of unpredictable hits as well as lack of markers of nephron mass, functional reserve and regenerative capacity.

Financial impact of delayed graft function in kidney transplantation.

Increased utilization of suboptimal organs in response to organ shortage has resulted in increased incidence of delayed graft function (DGF) after transplantation. Although presumed increased costs associated with DGF are a deterrent to the utilization of these organs, the financial burden of DGF has not been established. We used the Premier Healthcare Database to conduct a retrospective analysis of healthcare resource utilization and costs in kidney transplant patients (n = 12 097) between 1/1/2014 and 12/31/2018. We compared cost and hospital resource utilization for transplants in high-volume (n = 8715) vs low-volume hospitals (n = 3382), DGF (n = 3087) vs non-DGF (n = 9010), and recipients receiving 1 dialysis (n = 1485) vs multiple dialysis (n = 1602). High-volume hospitals costs were lower than low-volume hospitals ($103 946 vs $123 571, P < .0001). DGF was associated with approximately $18 000 (10%) increase in mean costs ($130 492 vs $112 598, P < .0001), 6 additional days of hospitalization (14.7 vs 8.7, P < .0001), and 2 additional ICU days (4.3 vs 2.1, P < .0001). Multiple dialysis sessions were associated with an additional $10 000 compared to those with only 1. In conclusion, DGF is associated with increased costs and length of stay for index kidney transplant hospitalizations and payment schemes taking this into account may reduce clinicians' reluctance to utilize less-than-ideal kidneys.

Comprehensive assessment of deceased donor kidneys with clinical characteristics, pre-implant biopsy histopathology and hypothermic mechanical perfusion parameters is highly predictive of delayed graft function.

Background: Due to the current high demand for transplant tissue, an increasing proportion of kidney donors are considered extended criteria donors, which results in a higher incidence of delayed graft function (DGF) in organ recipients. Therefore, it is important to fully investigate the risk factors of DGF, and establish a prediction system to assess donor kidney quality before transplantation.Methods: A total of 333 donation after cardiac death kidney transplant recipients were included in this retrospective study. Both univariate and multivariate analyses were used to analyze the risk factors of DGF occurrence. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to analyze the predictive value of variables on DGF posttransplant.Results: The donor clinical scores, kidney histopathologic Remuzzi scores and hypothermic mechanical perfusion (HMP) parameters (flow and resistance index) were all correlated. 46 recipients developed DGF postoperatively, with an incidence of 13.8% (46/333). Multivariate logistic regression analysis of the kidney transplants revealed that the independent risk factors of DGF occurrence post-transplantation included donor score (OR = 1.12, 95% CI 1.06-1.19, p < 0.001), Remuzzi score (OR = 1.21, 95% CI 1.02-1.43, p = 0.029) and acute tubular injury (ATI) score (OR = 4.72, 95% CI 2.32-9.60, p < 0.001). Prediction of DGF with ROC curve showed that the area under the curve was increased to 0.89 when all variables (donor score, Remuzzi score, ATI score and HMP resistance index) were considered together.Conclusions: Combination of donor clinical information, kidney pre-implant histopathology and HMP parameters provide a more accurate prediction of DGF occurrence post-transplantation than any of the measures alone.

Effect of Perioperative Optimization of Arterial Oxygen Content and Perfusion Pressure on the Function of the Transplanted Kidney in the Retrospective Study of Excretory Function and Assessment of New Markers of Kidney Damage: IL-18, Neutrophil Gelatinase-Associated Lipocalin, and Clusterin.

INTRODUCTION: The concept of anesthesia, in which kidney perfusion is optimized, the use of nephrotoxic drugs is avoided, and general anesthesia with protective and preconditioning properties of the graft is applied, is a key element of the therapeutic strategy in kidney transplantation (KTx). MATERIAL AND METHOD: A total of 86 patients (mean age: 49.4 ± 14.0 years, 66% men) with end-stage renal disease who underwent KTx between 2012 and 2015 were included in this retrospective study. Our aim was to assess the effect of oxygen content in arterial blood and selected hemodynamic parameters on the graft function and the occurrence of delayed graft failure. RESULTS: No differences were found in baseline characteristics, indication for transplantation, and surgical technique used among study population. No correlation was found between oxygen delivery exponents and both standard markers of renal function and new biochemical markers (eg, IL-18, clusterin, and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin [NGAL]). DISCUSSION: In our study, hemodynamic parameters measured at scheduled intervals did not exceed the physiological range, which might have been the reason for the lack of correlation between the function of graft and the described hemodynamic conditions. At the same time, in the observed ranges of perfusion pressure during optimization of the oxygen content, no correlations were found with the postoperative function of the transplanted kidney. That observation could be a valuable conclusion for reducing the tendency of maintaining high blood pressure with the abuse of catecholamines, especially vasoconstrictors, and volume therapy, whose negative effect on tissue perfusion is unequivocal.

Assessment of Hemoglobin Levels in Patients Qualified for Kidney Transplantation in the Perioperative Period and Its Impact on the Occurrence of Delayed Graft Function.

BACKGROUND: Anesthesia in patients undergoing kidney transplantation (KTx) should be aimed at creating optimal hemodynamic conditions for the newly implanted kidney. Changes in of blood count, caused mainly by intraoperative hemodilution, may adversely affect the perioperative course by strengthening the pathologic mechanisms of ischemia-reperfusion syndrome. METHODS: A total of 86 patients (mean age: 49.4 ± 14.0 years, 66% men) with end-stage renal disease who underwent KTx between 2012 and 2015 were included in this retrospective study. Our aim was to assess the hemoglobin level and the effect of fluctuations caused by the implemented fluid therapy on graft function and the occurrence of delayed graft failure. RESULTS: There was no difference in baseline characteristics, indication for transplantation, and surgical technique used among study population. Among the whole observation group, no correlation was found between fluid therapy causing hemodilution with a decrease in hemoglobin concentration and the occurrence of delayed graft failure. CONCLUSIONS: In our observations, we paid special attention to the problem of hemodilution in patients undergoing KTx. It is important to emphasize the importance of proper preparation of the patient for KTx by earlier implementation of anemia therapy, thus preventing exacerbation of anemia in the postoperative period, especially because the perioperative use of blood products is associated with numerous complications and a worse prognosis for the newly implanted kidney.

Pre-emptive deceased-donor kidney transplant: A matched cohort study. / Una aproximación al trasplante renal anticipado de donante cadáver. Estudio de cohortes emparejadas.

INTRODUCTION: Currently, kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice for patients with kidney disease who require replacement therapy. Dialysis is a necessary step, but not mandatory prior to transplantation. There is the possibility of pre-emptive transplantation or transplantation in pre-dialysis, that is, without previous dialysis. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the result of our experience with a pre-emptive kidney transplant from a deceased donor. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective, observational, matched cohort study. We compared 66 pre-emptive with 66 non pre-emptive recipients, who received a first renal graft performed at our centre, matched by age and gender of donors and recipients, time of transplant, immunological risk, immunosuppression and cold ischaemia time. Early graft loss, incidence of acute rejection, delayed graft function, renal function at 12 and 36 months and graft and recipient survival were assessed in this period. RESULTS: The percentage of recipients who presented early graft loss, delayed graft function and acute rejection was similar in both groups. No differences were observed in their renal function at 12 and 36 months after transplantation, as well as the actuarial survival of patients (P=0.801) and grafts (P=0.693) in the studied period. The total calculated cost of the period on dialysis for the control group was 8,033,893.16 euros. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-emptive transplantation can yield comparable outcomes to those for post-dialysis kidney transplantation, and results in better quality of life for patients with end-stage kidney disease, as well as a reduced cost.

Liver Transplantation with "Hors Tour" Allocated Versus Standard MELD Allocated Grafts: Single-Center Audit and Impact on the Liver Pool in France.

BACKGROUND: The French transplant governing system defined "Rescue" (the so-called "Hors Tour") livers as those livers which were declined for the five top-listed patients. This study compares the outcomes following liver transplantation (LT) in patients who received a donor liver through a rescue allocation (RA) procedure or according to MELD score priority (standard allocation, SA) and evaluates the impact on the graft pool of a proactive policy to accept RA grafts. METHODS: Data from all consecutive patients who underwent LT with SA or RA grafts from 2011 to 2015 were compared in terms of short- and long-term outcomes. RESULTS: The 249 elective first LTs were performed with 64 (25.7%) RA and 185 (74.3%) SA grafts. RA grafts were obtained from older donors and were associated with a longer cold ischemia time. Recipients of RA livers were older and had lower MELD scores. The rates of delayed graft function, primary nonfunction, retransplantation, complications, and mortality were similar between the RA and SA groups. At 1 and 3 and 5 years, graft and patient survival rates were similar between the groups. These results were maintained after matching on recipient characteristics. Our proactive policy to accept RA grafts increased the liver pool for elective first transplantation by 25%. CONCLUSIONS: RA livers can be safely transplanted into selected recipients and significantly expand the liver pool.

Posttransplant Outcomes for cPRA-100% Recipients Under the New Kidney Allocation System.

BACKGROUND: There is concern in the transplant community that outcomes for the most highly sensitized recipients might be poor under Kidney Allocation System (KAS) high prioritization. METHODS: To study this, we compared posttransplant outcomes of 525 pre-KAS (December 4, 2009, to December 3, 2014) calculated panel-reactive antibodies (cPRA)-100% recipients to 3026 post-KAS (December 4, 2014, to December 3, 2017) cPRA-100% recipients using SRTR data. We compared mortality and death-censored graft survival using Cox regression, acute rejection, and delayed graft function (DGF) using logistic regression, and length of stay (LOS) using negative binomial regression. RESULTS: Compared with pre-KAS recipients, post-KAS recipients were allocated kidneys with lower Kidney Donor Profile Index (median 30% versus 35%, P < 0.001) but longer cold ischemic time (CIT) (median 21.0 h versus 18.6 h, P < 0.001). Compared with pre-KAS cPRA-100% recipients, those post-KAS had higher 3-year patient survival (93.6% versus 91.4%, P = 0.04) and 3-year death-censored graft survival (93.7% versus 90.6%, P = 0.005). The incidence of DGF (29.3% versus 29.2%, P = 0.9), acute rejection (11.2% versus 11.7%, P = 0.8), and median LOS (5 d versus 5d, P = 0.2) were similar between pre-KAS and post-KAS recipients. After accounting for secular trends and adjusting for recipient characteristics, post-KAS recipients had no difference in mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.861.623.06, P = 0.1), death-censored graft failure (aHR: 0.521.001.91, P > 0.9), DGF (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.580.861.27, P = 0.4), acute rejection (aOR: 0.610.941.43, P = 0.8), and LOS (adjusted LOS ratio: 0.981.161.36, P = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: We did not find any statistically significant worsening of outcomes for cPRA-100% recipients under KAS, although longer-term monitoring of posttransplant mortality is warranted.

Development and implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol for renal transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Successful implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in kidney transplantation requires multidisciplinary consultation, education and attention to protocol. This study discusses the process implementation pathway of the ERAS protocol and its outcome. METHODS: A standardized ERAS protocol was designed for the renal transplant recipient and implemented in July 2017. Data collected prospectively of recipients transplanted from July 2017 to December 2018 were compared to prospectively collected data of recipients who were transplanted prior to ERAS implementation from January 2016 to July 2017 from our renal database. The parameters of interest included length of stay, incidence of delayed graft function and readmission rate. RESULTS: There was no difference in the demographics and the incidence of delayed graft function across both groups, although subgroup analysis suggested a significantly lower incidence of delayed graft function with kidneys donated after circulatory death in the cohort that were managed by the ERAS protocol. The median length of stay for patients on the ERAS protocol was 5 days (range 3-16 days). This was 2 days shorter than the median length of stay for patients not on the ERAS protocol (7 days; range 5-14, P < 0.001). This statistically significant difference in length of stay was consistent across all donor subgroups (living donor, donor after cardiac death and donation after brainstem death). Seventy-nine percent of the patients on the ERAS protocol were discharged on post-operative day 4. CONCLUSION: An ERAS protocol for renal transplant patients is feasible. Our data show that successful implementation of ERAS in kidney transplantation is possible and results in significant cost savings due to shorter length of stay.

Live Confocal Tissue Assessment With SYTO16/PI and WGA Staining Visualizes Acute Organ Damage and Predicts Delayed Graft Function in Kidney Transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of our prospective clinical trial was to test a tissue staining technique (real-time confocal analysis [RTCA]) as a rapid assessment tool for donor kidney quality and function in human kidney transplantation. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Tools for objective graft tissue viability assessment before kidney transplantation are lacking. RTCA has recently been established and tested in a pilot study using rodent kidneys. METHODS: RTCA was performed in kidney biopsies stained with SYTO16/PI and WGA. A score between -3 (100% nonviable) and +3 (100% viable) describes the sum of viable cells divided by the number of nonviable cells per examined area (glomerulus, proximal, and distal tubules). The primary study endpoint was the delayed graft function (DGF). RESULTS: Seventy-one kidney transplant recipients were transplanted. The median recipient and donor age were 58.5 and 57 years, respectively. Cold ischemia time was 13.6 ±â€Š4.7 hours; anastomosis time was 30.8 ±â€Š8.7 minutes (mean ±â€ŠSD). Overall, 23 (33.8%) patients developed DGF. The RTCA score was significantly lower in kidneys developing DGF -0.43 ±â€Š1.78 versus no DGF 0.91 ±â€Š2.17, P = 0.01. The Remuzzi score did not differ between DGF and no DGF, P = 0.13. Remuzzi score and RTCA score correlate inversely significantly; P = 0.004. In the multivariate analysis, solely RTCA score was revealed as a significant independent factor predicting DGF; P = 0.015, Wald = 5.95, odds ratio = 0.72, 95% confidence interval = 0.55 to 0.94. CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate that RTCA is feasible and clinically meaningful. The RTCA score predicts DGF and is a valid option to be applied in renal transplantation.