Assessment of the Potential for Veverimer Drug-Drug Interactions.

Veverimer is a polymer being developed as a potential treatment of metabolic acidosis in patients with chronic kidney disease. Veverimer selectively binds and removes hydrochloric acid from the gastrointestinal tract, resulting in an increase in serum bicarbonate. Veverimer is not systemically absorbed, so potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs) are limited to effects on the absorption of other oral drugs through binding to veverimer in the gastrointestinal tract or increases in gastric pH caused by veverimer binding to hydrochloric acid. In in vitro binding experiments using a panel of 16 test drugs, no positively charged, neutral, or zwitterionic drugs bound to veverimer. Three negatively charged drugs (furosemide, aspirin, ethacrynic acid) bound to veverimer; however, this binding was reduced or eliminated in the presence of normal physiologic concentrations (100-170 mM) of chloride. Veverimer increased gastric pH in vivo by 1.5-3 pH units. This pH elevation peaked within 1 hour and had returned to baseline after 1.5-3 hours. Omeprazole did not alter the effect of veverimer on gastric pH. The clinical relevance of in vitro binding and the transient increase in gastric pH was evaluated in human DDI studies using two drugs with the most binding to veverimer (furosemide, aspirin) and two additional drugs with pH-dependent solubility effecting absorption (dabigatran, warfarin). None of the four drugs showed clinically meaningful DDI with veverimer in human studies. Based on the physicochemical characteristics of veverimer and results from in vitro and human studies, veverimer is unlikely to have significant DDIs. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Patients with chronic kidney disease, who are usually on many drugs, are vulnerable to drug-drug interactions (DDIs). The potential for DDIs with veverimer was evaluated based on the known site of action and physicochemical structure of the polymer, which restricts the compound to the gastrointestinal tract. Based on the findings from in vitro and human studies, we conclude that veverimer is unlikely to have clinically significant DDIs.

In vitro Comparative Quality Assessment of Different Brands of Furosemide Tablets Marketed in Northwest Ethiopia.

BACKGROUND: The use of ineffective and poor quality drugs endangers therapeutic treatment and may lead to treatment failure. For desired therapeutic effect, drugs should contain the appropriate amount of active pharmaceutical ingredient and the required physical characteristics. AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate quality as well as physicochemical bioequivalence of different brands of furosemide tablets marketed in Bahir Dar, Northwest Ethiopia. METHODS: Five different brands of furosemide tablets were purchased from community pharmacies in Bahir Dar city, Northwest Ethiopia. The quality control parameters of furosemide tablets were determined by identification, weight variation, disintegration, assay and dissolution tests and the results were compared with USP and BP pharmacopoeial standards. Difference (f1) and similarity (f2) factors were calculated to assess in vitro bioequivalence requirements. RESULTS: Identification test results revealed that all samples contained the stated active pharmaceutical ingredients. The results of weight variation tests indicated that all samples complied with USP specification limits. The active pharmaceutical ingredients quantitative assay showed that all the brands of furosemide tablets were between the 90% and 105% limit of label claim. Similarly, all samples fulfilled disintegration time (i.e., ≤30 min) and dissolution tolerance limits (i.e., Q ≥80% at 60 min). Hence, none of the samples were found to be counterfeit and/or substandard. Difference factor (f1) values were <15 and similarity factor (f2) values were >50 for all the tested brands of furosemide tablets. CONCLUSION: This study revealed that all the furosemide brands met the quality specification of weight variation, hardness, friability, dissolution, disintegration and assay. The study also indicated similarity in the dissolution profile of the brands of furosemide tablets with the innovator product. Hence, all of these generic brands could be substituted with the innovator product in clinical practice.

Reduced loop diuretic use in patients taking sacubitril/valsartan compared with enalapril: the PARADIGM-HF trial.

AIMS: To assess differences in diuretic dose requirements in patients treated with sacubitril/valsartan compared with enalapril in the Prospective comparison of ARNI with ACEI to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and morbidity in Heart Failure (PARADIGM-HF) trial. METHODS AND RESULTS: Overall, 8399 patients with New York Heart Association class II-IV heart failure and reduced LVEF were randomized to sacubitril/valsartan 200 mg bid or enalapril 10 mg twice daily. Loop diuretic doses were assessed at baseline, 6, 12, and 24 months, and furosemide dose equivalents were calculated via multiplication factors (2x for torsemide and 40x for bumetanide). Percentages of participants with reductions or increases in loop diuretic dose were determined. At baseline, 80.8% of participants were taking any diuretics (n = 6290 for loop diuretics, n = 496 for other diuretics); of those, recorded dosage data for loop diuretics were available on 5487 participants. Mean baseline furosemide equivalent doses were 48.2 mg for sacubitril/valsartan and 49.6 mg for enalapril (P = 0.25). Patients treated with sacubitril/valsartan were more likely to reduce diuretic dose and less likely to increase diuretic dose relative to those randomized to enalapril at 6, 12, 24 months post-randomization, with an overall decreased diuretic use of 2.0% (P = 0.02), 4.1% (P < 0.001), and 6.1% (P < 0.001) at 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively, with similar findings in an on-treatment analysis. CONCLUSION: Treatment with sacubitril/valsartan was associated with more loop diuretic dose reductions and fewer dose increases compared with enalapril, suggesting that treatment with sacubitril/valsartan may reduce the requirement for loop diuretics relative to enalapril in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.

Subcutaneous furosemide for the treatment of heart failure: a state-of-the art review.

The prevalence of heart failure (HF) is on the rise. By 2030, over eight million Americans (46% increase from current prevalence) will have heart failure. In the USA, approximately 30 billion dollars is spent annually on heart failure and this number will likely double in 2030. Thus, HF represents a significant economic burden. Acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) is a clinical spectrum, which refers to increasing symptoms and signs of heart failure prompting an emergency room visit or hospitalization. In ADHF, inpatient administration of intravenous diuretic is the standard of care due to the variability in the absorption of oral diuretics. Within 30 days, 25-30% of these patients are readmitted with recurrent ADHF. Recent efforts have focused in reducing HF readmission, and thereby decreasing costs; hence, innovative outpatient treatment options have emerged. Subcutaneous furosemide use will potentially overcome the need to place intravenous lines, reduce associated expenses, and enable management of ADHF at home. This review presents data on the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of subcutaneous furosemide, scientific evidence on the use of this therapy in the palliative and hospice population, and its experimental use as an outpatient therapy and/or as a bridge from inpatient to home.

In vivo assessment of novel furosemide gastro-mucoadhesive delivery system based on a kind of anion ion-exchange fiber.

A novel gastro-mucoadhesive delivery system based on a kind of anion ion-exchange fiber has been developed. Furosemide (FM), which is site-specifically absorbed from the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract, was used as model drug. A novel-modified dissolution system, which can also be called "flow through diffusion cell," was used to study the drug release from the drug fibers. The GI transit studies of the FM fiber complexes in rats and gamma imaging studies in volunteers were carried out to evaluate the gastro-mucoadhesive behavior of the fiber. The pharmacokinetic profile and parameters of the FM suspension and FM fiber in fasted and fed rats were measured, respectively. Studies on rats and volunteers provided evidence for the validity of the hypothesis that the drug fiber provided better gastro-mucoadhesive properties in vivo.

Statistical evaluation of the regulatory guidelines for use of furosemide in race horses.

The pharmacokinetic behavior of furosemide concentrations in performance horses is of great interest to the equine industry and equine researchers. Specifically, such information is useful for the evaluation of the existing guidelines in several racing jurisdictions and for the possible development of new guidelines for varying time periods after administration. We studied several approaches within the framework of nonlinear mixed effects models to increase the accuracy of evaluating these guidelines. Theoretical properties of the proposed methods were examined and the variances of the resulting estimators compared. Their numerical performances were further evaluated through simulations. Finally, we applied these methods to a furosemide concentration profile data set and used our findings to address certain important practical issues.

Assessment of pharmaceutical quality of furosemide tablets from multinational markets.

This report describes results of a collaborative study in which samples of the 40-mg strength of furosemide tablets were evaluated following a common protocol based on British (BP), European (Ph. Eur.), and US Pharmacopoeial (USP) specifications. Several tests, including identification, uniformity of mass, and dissolution, were performed. In total, excluding Lasix lots, results for 162 lots obtained from 115 manufacturers or suppliers were submitted. Also, 23 laboratories identified and submitted data for 34 lots of Lasix products available in their countries. There were no reported abnormalities in the physical test requirements of the products analyzed. The summaries (n, mean, and 95% CI) of the assay results for the "standard sample" (a common sample), Lasix lots from participating countries, and for all other furosemide products, respectively, are as follows: 30, 99.8%, 96-104; 33, 100.0%, 94-106; and 162, 99.6, 94-105. About half (approximately 62%) of the reported uniformity of mass results based on tablet weights were in the range 150-175 mg/tablet. However, there appears to be notable variability in tablet weights that would result in significant differences in the ratios (0.14 to 0.40) of active ingredient to excipient. The reported disintegration times ranged from 0 (instantaneous) to 18 min, with most less than 1 min. The drug dissolution testing was conducted with phosphate buffer at pH 5.8 (USP recommended). Another test was conducted with acetate buffer at pH 4.6 (noncompendial). There appears to be remarkable similarity in overall percentage of drug release from the three types of products (standard sample, Lasix lots, and other products). Although apparently there is a very wide spread in dissolution characteristics of the products tested, the analyses of variance did not detect differences among the products tested and, to this extent, would not indicate differences in bioavailability characteristics for most of these products. It is observed that about 20-38% of the variability in dissolution testing is not product related (i.e., it is from the dissolution testing itself), while the remaining 62-80% variability is product related (manufacturing, formulation, etc). The results of this multinational collaborative study showed that most of the furosemide products available in different countries met the required pharmaceutical quality standards, including drug-release characteristics. Based on an extensive statistical analysis, the main concern from the study was that the high variability in drug dissolution testing would require wide tolerance standards (e.g., pharmacopoeial standards). This may result in lack of needed discriminating ability of the test in revealing the impacts of formulation and manufacturing changes on in vitro, and perhaps in vivo, drug-release characteristics.