Endoscopic grading of gastric atrophy and histological gastritis staging on risk assessment for early gastric cancer: A case-control study.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the predictive value of endoscopic grading of gastric atrophy using Kimura-Takemoto classification, histological grading systems of operative link on gastritis assessment (OLGA) and operative link on gastric intestinal metaplasia (OLGIM) on risk stratification for early gastric cancer (EGC) and other potential risk factors of EGC. METHODS: A single-center, case-control study was retrospectively conducted including 68 patients with EGC treated with endoscopic submucosal dissection and 68 age- and sex-matched control subjects. Kimura-Takemoto classification, OLGA and OLGIM systems, and other potential risk factors were evaluated between the two groups. RESULTS: Of the 68 EGC lesions, 22 (32.4%) were well differentiated, 38 (55.9%) were moderately differentiated, and 8 (11.8%) were poorly differentiated, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed O-type Kimura-Takemoto classification (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 3.282, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.106-9.744, P = 0.032) and OLGIM stage III/IV (AOR 17.939, 95% CI 1.874-171.722, P = 0.012) were significantly related to a higher risk of EGC. Especially, O-type Kimura-Takemoto classification within 6-12 months before EGC diagnosis (AOR 4.780, 95% CI 1.650-13.845, P = 0.004) was independently associated with EGC risk. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the three systems for EGC were comparable. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic Kimura-Takemoto classification and histological OLGIM stage III/IV are independent risk factors for EGC, which may reduce the need for biopsies in risk stratification of EGC. Further multicenter prospective studies of large sizes are needed.

The application of new gastric cancer screening score system for gastric cancer screening and risk assessment of gastric precancerous lesions in China.

Objective: To evaluate the value of new gastric cancer screening score system for risk assessment of gastric precancerous lesions.Methods: A total of 520 patients were enrolled after the examination of endoscopy at Endoscopy Center, Department of Gastroenterology, from June 2018 to December 2021. The patients were divided into three groups according to age, gender, serum helicobacter pylori antibody test, pepsinogen I (PGI), pepsinogen II (PGII), pepsinogen I/II ratio (PGR) and gastrin-17 test results before endoscopy: Group A defined as low-risk group (0-11 points), Group B defined as middle-risk group (12-16 points), Group C defined as high-risk group (17-23 points). The detection rates of gastric cancer and atrophic gastritis in three groups were analyzed. According to the range and degree of atrophy/intestinal metaplasia, patients were divided into five groups on the basis of OLGA/OLGIM staging system. The levels of PG I, PG II and PGR were compared between different groups, and the correlation between new gastric cancer screening score system and OLGA/OLGIM staging system were evaluated. Statistical analysis was accomplished by ANOVA, chi-square test and Gamma coefficient analysis.Results: A total of 520 patients were enrolled. 268 patients were classified into group A,222 patients into group B and 30 patients into group C, respectively. According to the pathological results, 281 cases were non-atrophic gastritis, 230 cases atrophic gastritis and 9 cases gastric cancer. For OLGA staging system, 281 patients were divided into stage-0 group, 121 patients into stage-I group, 72 patients into stage-II group, 33 patients into stage-III group and 13 patients into stage-IV groups. The PGI and PGR level correlated inversely with the rising OLGA stages (F = 3.028, p = .016, F = 6.036, p < .001). For OLGIM staging system, 252 patients were divided into stage-0 group, 137 patients into stage-I group, 80 patients into stage-II group, 36 patients into stage-III group and 15 patients into stage-IV group. The PGR level correlated inversely with the rising OLGIM stages (F = 3.466, p＝.007). The detection rates of gastric cancer and atrophic gastritis in Group C were much higher than other groups. (X2 = 14.727, p < .001; X2 = 51.280, p < .001). Gamma coefficient analysis showed significant correlations between OLGA/OLGIM and the new gastric cancer screening score system (p < .001).Conclusions: The new gastric cancer screening score system is closely linked with histological OLGA/OLGIM staging system in the risk assessment of gastric precancerous lesions. The role of new gastric cancer screening score system in future gastric precancerous lesions screening and high risk population identifying was promising.

Real-time determination of gastric juice pH with EndoFaster® for atrophic gastritis assessment.

BACKGROUND: In patients with atrophic gastritis involving gastric body mucosa the pH value of gastric juice is distinctly increased, so that pH assessment would allow predict this precancerous lesion. We tested whether EndoFaster® - a device allowing real-time pH measure and H. pylori diagnosis - may optimize the need of taking gastric biopsies. METHODS: In this prospective, multicentre study, the accuracy of EndoFaster® for ruling out gastric atrophy involving corporal mucosa was assessed. Real-time pH and ammonium determination was performed by aspirating 3-6 ml gastric juice during endoscopy. Histology performed on 5 standard gastric biopsies was used as gold standard. RESULTS: A total of 1008 consecutive patients were observed in 12 centres. At histology, gastric body mucosa atrophy/metaplasia was detected in 65 (6.4%) cases, and a pH value >4.5 in the gastric juice was observed in 150 patients. The values of EndoFaster® performance in predicting the presence of atrophic gastritis were as follow: 51% sensitivity, 84% specificity, 18% PPV, 96% NPV, and 82% accuracy. The NPV value was not distinctly affected by neither ongoing proton pump inhibitor therapy nor H. pylori infection. By considering also data of ammonium concentrations, the values of EndoFaster® in detecting extensive atrophy on gastric mucosa were 74% sensitivity, 84% specificity, 24% PPV, 98% NPV, and 83% accuracy. CONCLUSION: The very high NPV of EndoFaster® might allow to safely rule out presence of atrophic gastritis, reducing the need of taking gastric biopsies in unselected patients managed in clinical practice.

[The value of OLGA staging system in risk assessment of gastric precancerous states and precancerous lesions].

Objective: To investigate the role of operative link on gastritis assessment (OLGA) staging system in risk assessment of gastric precancerous states and precancerous lesions. Methods: A total of 682 patients undergoing gastroscopy from January to July 2016 at the First Hospital of Jiaxing were enrolled. According to the results of gastroscopy and pathology, patients were divided into five groups by OLGA staging system, respectively. The differences of atrophic progression/reversion rate, detection rates of intraepithelial neoplasia and gastric cancer among different OLGA groups during 5-year follow-up were compared. Results: A total of 437 patients completed endoscopic follow-up, including 207 cases in Stage-0, 158 cases in Stage-Ⅰ, 47 cases in Stage-Ⅱ, 18 cases in Stage-Ⅲ and 7 cases in Stage-Ⅳ. There were 24 cases of atrophy progression, 78 cases of atrophy reversion, 5 cases of intraepithelial neoplasia and 2 cases of gastric cancer. The atrophy progression rate correlated with the rising OLGA stages(χ2=19.14, P<0.001);The rate of atrophy reversion in high-risk group was significantly lower than that in low-risk group(χ2=4.96, P=0.026); The detection rate of intraepithelial neoplasia and gastric cancer in high-risk group was significantly higher than that in low-risk group(χ2=29.63, 11.60, both P<0.05). Conclusions: Histological OLGA staging system is helpful to realize the risk stratification assessment of gastric precancerous states and precancerous lesions. It has practical significance to formulate individualized endoscopic/histological follow-up plan for OLGA high-risk group.

Serum pepsinogen levels and OLGA/OLGIM staging in the assessment of atrophic gastritis types.

BACKGROUND: We assessed the validity of using serum pepsinogen tests (sPGTs) to differentiate autoimmune atrophic gastritis (AAG) from environmental atrophic gastritis (EAG). We also investigated the correlation and prognostic value between disease stage, according to Operative Link for Gastritis Assessment (OLGA)/Operative Link on Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia Assessment (OLGIM), and sPGT results in patients with gastric atrophy. METHODS: We enroled 115 patients in this prospective study: 95 with atrophic gastritis (16 with AAG and 79 with EAG) and 20 non-atrophic gastritis. These patients, along with 32 control patients, underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Atrophy and intestinal metaplasia of the gastric biopsy specimens were staged according to the OLGA/OLGIM staging systems. RESULTS: The median (IQR) age of the patients (83 females (56.5%)) was 58 (46-67) years. Patients in the AAG group represented histologically advanced stages. The AAG group had lower pepsinogen (PG) I and II levels, as well as a lower PGI/PGII ratio, compared with the EAG group (p<0.01, p<0.05 and p<0.01, respectively). The optimal PGI/PGII ratio for predicting AAG was ≤1.9 (100% sensitivity and 100% specificity), and that for predicting EAG was ≤9.2 (47.5% sensitivity and 90.6% specificity). The OLGA/OLGIM stage was negatively correlated with the PGI level and PGI/PGII ratio. In the AAG group, four of five patients with low-grade dysplasia had OLGA/OLGIM stage III-IV disease. CONCLUSIONS: sPGT may provide valuable information for differentiating advanced-stage AAG from EAG, and in patients with atrophic gastritis, use of sPGTs and OLGA/OLGIM staging together may predict gastric cancer risk.

A single vial is enough in the absence of endoscopic suspected intestinal metaplasia - less is more!

Background: For the correct staging of chronic atrophic gastritis (AG) and gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM) at least 4 biopsies are recommended: 2 from the antrum/incisura and 2 from the body sent in two different vials. As virtual chromoendoscopy with narrow-band-imaging (NBI) is valid both in the diagnosis and staging of GIM, it is reasonable to question the need to separate biopsy samples in all procedures. Aims: To evaluate if biopsy samples can be placed in the same vial without implications in the diagnosis and follow-up of the patient, if during gastroscopy no typical endoscopic pattern of GIM with NBI is observed. Methods: Multicentre prospective study of a consecutive sample of patients (n = 183) submitted to gastroscopy using NBI with no superficial neoplastic lesions and no suggestive areas of GIM. Biopsies of both antrum/incisure and body were performed in all patients and samples were placed in the same vial for histologic assessment [according to OLGA (operative link for gastritis assessment) and OLGIM (operative link for gastric intestinal metaplasia)], blinded to endoscopic features. Results: In all patients, OLGA and OLGIM calculation was possible as the pathologists could distinguish biopsy samples from antrum/incisure from those of gastric body. The negative predictive value was 100% for advanced stages of GIM or AG as 179 (98%) patients presented OLGIM 0 and only 4 (2%) presented OLGIM I. Regarding AG, 150 (82%) presented OLGA 0, 23 (13%) OLGA I and 10 (6%) OLGA II. Conclusion: In the absence of a typical endoscopic pattern of GIM using NBI, it is effective to place biopsies' specimens in the same vial (for Helicobacter pylori diagnosis) or even to abstain from biopsies as no single patient with significant changes seems to be missed. This change in clinical practice can have a significant impact on endoscopy costs.

Non-invasive method for the assessment of gastric acid secretion.

Methods for the measure of gastric acid secretion include invasive and non-invasive tests. The gold-standard to measure the acid output is the collection of gastric after in basal condition (Basal Acid Output, B.A.O.) and after an i.m. injection of pentagastrin (Maximal Acid Output, M.A.O.). However, direct measurement of gastric acid production is out of order in clinical practice, but many GI symptoms are claimed to be related with acid disorders and empirically cured. Hypochlorhydria is associated with precancerous conditions such as chronic atrophic gastritis (CAG). Acid measurement with non-invasive methods (pepsinogens) is supported by international guidelines.

Systematic review with meta-analysis: diagnostic performance of the combination of pepsinogen, gastrin-17 and anti-Helicobacter pylori antibodies serum assays for the diagnosis of atrophic gastritis.

BACKGROUND: The combination of pepsinogen, gastrin-17 and anti-H. pylori antibodies serological assays (panel test) is a non-invasive tool for the diagnosis of atrophic gastritis. However, the diagnostic reliability of this test is still uncertain. AIM: To assess the diagnostic performance of the serum panel test for the diagnosis of atrophic gastritis. METHODS: Medline via PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library databases and abstracts of international conferences proceedings were searched from January 1995 to December 2016 using the primary keywords "pepsinogens," "gastrin," "atrophic gastritis," "gastric precancerous lesions." Studies were included if they assessed the accuracy of the serum panel test for the diagnosis of atrophic gastritis using histology according to the updated Sydney System as reference standard. RESULTS: Twenty studies with a total of 4241 subjects assessed the performance of serum panel test for the diagnosis of atrophic gastritis regardless of the site in the stomach. The summary sensitivity was 74.7% (95% confidence interval (CI), 62.0-84.3) and the specificity was 95.6% (95%CI, 92.6-97.4). With a prevalence of atrophic gastritis of 27% (median prevalence across the studies), the negative predictive value was 91%. Few studies with small sample size assessed the performance of the test in detecting the site of atrophic gastritis. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of pepsinogen, gastrin-17 and anti-H. pylori antibodies serological assays appears to be a reliable tool for the diagnosis of atrophic gastritis. This test may be used for screening subjects or populations at high risk of gastric cancer for atrophic gastritis; however, a cost-effectiveness analysis is needed.

The potential value of serum pepsinogen for the diagnosis of atrophic gastritis among the health check-up populations in China: a diagnostic clinical research.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to assess the validity of the measurement of pepsinogen as a screening test for chronic atrophic gastritis (AG) in health check-up populations in China. METHODS: Patients from consecutive regular health check-up were enrolled from January 2014 to June 2015. Endoscopy, combined with monitoring the Helicobacter pylori (Hp) infections, and measuring the serum pepsinogen (PG) were used to determine the diagnostic accuracy of PG for the screening of atrophic gastritis. Histopathology was assessed by the Operative Link on Gastritis Assessment (OLGA) system. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS statistical software. RESULTS: The total Hp infection rate was 40%. Based on pathology, the 996 participants were divided into three groups: non-atrophic (NAG), mild-moderate atrophic (MAG): stage I and II of the OLGA classification, and severe atrophic (SAG): stage III and IV of the OLGA classification. Compared with NAG and MAG groups, PGR decreased significantly in SAG group (p < 0.05). PGI and PGII levels were significantly elevated in Hp-positive group, while the PGR was markedly decreased (p < 0.01). When MAG and SAG groups were combined and compared with NAG group, the best cutoff value for atrophy diagnosis was PGI ≤50.3 ng/ml; the cutoff value in Hp-negative group was absolutely higher than in Hp-positive group. When NAG and MAG groups were combined and compared with the SAG group, the best cutoff value for diagnosis of severe atrophy was at PGR ≤4.28. The cutoff values in Hp-negative and Hp-positive groups were calculated at PGR ≤6.28 and ≤4.28, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Pepsinogens play an important role in the identification of patients with atrophic gastritis and severe AG. Use of different cutoff values of PG for Hp-negative and Hp-positive groups may offer greater efficacy in the diagnosis of AG.

The correlation between histological gastritis staging- 'OLGA/OLGIM' and serum pepsinogen test in assessment of gastric atrophy/intestinal metaplasia in China.

BACKGROUND: Serum pepsinogen (PG) test, as an indicator of gastric mucosal atrophy, reflects the functional and morphologic status of gastric mucosal and it is suggested to serve as a useful predictive marker for patients with gastric cancer (GC). The available classifications of gastritis, known as the Operative Link on Gastritis Assessment (OLGA) and Operative Link on Gastritis Intestinal Metaplasia (OLGIM), integrating the severity and topography of atrophy/intestinal metaplasia (IM), have been gradually accepted and used in screening for GC in recent years. GOALS: To assess whether serum pepsinogen test, including PGI, PGII, PGI/PGII and gastrin-17 (G-17) could reflect the extent and topography of gastric mucosal atrophy/IM. Furthermore, to discuss the relationship between OLGA/OLGIM staging system and serum pepsinogen test in assessment of gastric atrophy/IM. METHODS: The OLGA/OLGIM ranks the gastric staging according to both the topography and the severity of gastric atrophy/IM. A retrospective study was conducted with 331 patients who underwent endoscopy with consecutive biopsy sampling and reassessed according to OLGA/OLGIM staging system. Serum pepsinogen test, including PGI, PGII, PGI/PGII and G-17, as well as serological Helicobacter pylori (Hp) antibody were also measured. Results were presented as gastritis stage, serum pepsinogen level and Hp status. Baseline characteristics were compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA) test for continuous data and Pearson's χ2 test for categorical data. A logistic regression model was used for the correlation analysis between OLGA/OLGIM and serological pepsinogen test. RESULTS: A total of 177 non-atrophic gastritis and 154 atrophic gastritis were analyzed, among which 40 were antrum atrophy, 32 were corpus atrophy and 82 were pan-atrophy. All patients were assessed applying the OLGA/OLGIM criteria with a mean age of 54.7 ± 10.8 years. Patients among OLGA/OLGIM Stage III-IV were presented with a lower level of serum PGI and PGI/PGII (p < .05), especially for Stage IV (p = .01). For both Hp-positive patients and Hp-negative patients according to OLGA system, PGI/PGII level correlated inversely with the rising stage (p = .022; p = .028). As for OLGIM system, similar difference can be seen in PGI/PGII level in either Hp-positive patients, or Hp-negative patients (p = .036; p = .013). In addition, the percentage of G-17 <1 pmol/L combined with PG-negative in antrum atrophy group was much higher than that of non-atrophy group and corpus atrophy group (25 versus 15.8 versus 6.3%) (p = .029). The proportion of G-17 > 15 pmol/L combined with PG-positive was apparently higher in corpus atrophy group, compared with other two groups (25 versus 11.3 versus 8.1%) (p = .023). Logistic regression modeling showed there exist significant connections between OLGA/OLGIM stages and serum pepsinogen test in patient stratification for gastric mucosal atrophy assessment (p < .001, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Serum pepsinogen test has a strong correlation with OLGA/OLGIM gastritis stage and could provide important information in assessment of atrophy/intestinal metaplasia.

Operative link on gastritis assessment stage is an appropriate predictor of early gastric cancer.

AIM: To assess the predictive value of Operative Link on Gastritis Assessment (OLGA) and Operative Link on Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia Assessment (OLGIM) stages in gastric cancer. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted with 71 patients with early gastric cancer (EGC) and 156 patients with non-EGC. All patients underwent endoscopic examination and systematic biopsy. Outcome measures were assessed and compared, including the Japanese endoscopic gastric atrophy (EGA) classification method and the modified OLGA method as well as the modified OLGIM method. Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) status was determined for all study participants. Stepwise logistic regression modeling was performed to analyze correlations between EGC and the EGA, OLGA and OLGIM methods. RESULTS: For patients with EGC and patients with non-EGC, the proportions of moderate-to-severe EGA cases were 64.8% and 44.9%, respectively (P = 0.005), the proportions of OLGA stages III-IV cases were 52.1% and 22.4%, respectively (P < 0.001), and the proportions of OLGIM stages III-IV cases were 42.3% and 19.9%, respectively (P < 0.001). OLGA stage and OLGIM stage were significantly related to EGA classification; specifically, logistic regression modeling showed significant correlations between EGC and moderate-to-severe EGA (OR = 1.95, 95% CI: 1.06-3.58, P = 0.031) and OLGA stages III-IV (OR = 3.14, 95%CI: 1.71-5.81, P < 0.001), but no significant correlation between EGC and OLGIM stages III-IV (P = 0.781). H. pylori infection rate was significantly higher in patients with moderate-to-severe EGA (75.0% vs 54.1%, P = 0.001) or OLGA/OLGIM stages III-IV (OLGA: 83.6% vs 55.8%, P < 0.001; OLGIM: 83.6% vs 57.8%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: OLGA classification is optimal for EGC screening. A surveillance program including OLGA stage and H. pylori infection status may facilitate early detection of gastric cancer.

[Population-based gastric cancer screening in Zhuanghe, Liaoning, from 1997 to 2011].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility of gastric cancer screening for the susceptible population in the high-risk areas of China and to optimize the screening programme. METHODS: By using the two-round screening method i.e. serum pepsinogen test combined with gastric mucosa biopsy, large-scale population screening programs were carried out in Zhuanghe, Liaoning province. All adults or residents above 35 years old with a positive family history of gastric cancer or gastrointestinal symptoms were targeted. RESULTS: Three large-scale population screenings were developed over the past 15 years. All together, 13078 participants accepted the two-round screening, and 108 gastric cancer cases were detected. Among them, the detection rate of early gastric cancer was 56.82%, 51.22% and 82.61%, respectively. The pathologically confirmed gastric cancer cases were immediately arranged to have early surgical treatment, and meanwhile, the follow-up files for the patients were established. With a consecutive and regular 10-year postoperative follow-up, the 5-year survival rate for these early gastric cancer patients reached 90.48%. Effectiveness and health economic evaluation confirmed that there are good specificity and sensitivity for the two round screening programs. It is cost-effective. As the primary screening method serum PG test can improve the screening examination rate and concentrate the gastric cancer risk populations. CONCLUSIONS: It is feasible to develop the gastric cancer screening program among the susceptible population in high-risk areas in our country, and the two-round screening method is of practical value. Research for early detection of gastric cancer should be further enhanced, and multidisciplinary and multicenter cooperation should be organized. It is necessary to extend the implementation the gastric cancer screening and to further improve the early detection programme, in order to make a breakthrough based on the present practice.

Management of precancerous conditions and lesions in the stomach (MAPS): guideline from the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE), European Helicobacter Study Group (EHSG), European Society of Pathology (ESP), and the Sociedade Portuguesa de Endoscopia Digestiva (SPED).

Atrophic gastritis, intestinal metaplasia, and epithelial dysplasia of the stomach are common and are associated with an increased risk for gastric cancer. In the absence of guidelines, there is wide disparity in the management of patients with these premalignant conditions. The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE), the European Helicobacter Study Group (EHSG), the European Society of Pathology (ESP) and the Sociedade Portuguesa de Endoscopia Digestiva (SPED) have therefore combined efforts to develop evidence-based guidelines on the management of patients with precancerous conditions and lesions of the stomach (termed MAPS). A multidisciplinary group of 63 experts from 24 countries developed these recommendations by means of repeat online voting and a meeting in June 2011 in Porto, Portugal. The recommendations emphasize the increased cancer risk in patients with gastric atrophy and metaplasia, and the need for adequate staging in the case of high grade dysplasia, and they focus on treatment and surveillance indications and methods.

Operative Link for Gastritis Assessment gastritis staging incorporates intestinal metaplasia subtyping.

Both sulfomucin-type intestinal metaplasia (ie, types II and III intestinal metaplasia, colonic-type intestinal metaplasia) and gastritis in Operative Link for Gastritis Assessment stages III and IV are associated with an increased risk of intestinal-type gastric cancer. This study aimed to verify the hypothesis that gastritis in Operative Link for Gastritis Assessment stages III and IV (both consistently associated with an increased cancer risk) is associated per se with types II and III intestinal metaplasia. Two hundred consecutive cases of atrophic gastritis (Operative Link for Gastritis Assessment stages I, II, III, and IV) were considered (50 cases for each stage). All cases were stained with high iron diamine, and intestinal metaplasia was subtyped accordingly (type I [ie, small-intestinal type] and types II and III). Helicobacter pylori status was also considered, distinguishing H pylori-positive versus H pylori-negative versus H pylori-eradicated patients. A significant association was found between intestinal metaplasia subtype and the Operative Link for Gastritis Assessment stage of gastritis (the higher the stage, the more the colonic-type of intestinal metaplasia, and vice versa; Wilcoxon, P = .001). The strength of the association between Operative Link for Gastritis Assessment stages and the 3 intestinal metaplasia subtypes was confirmed by logistic regression analysis (P < .001; odds ratio, 4.84; 95% confidence interval, 2.97-7.88). Intestinal metaplasia subtyping also correlated with the patient's age (Kruskal-Wallis, P = .001) and H pylori status (Fisher exact, P < .001). Operative Link for Gastritis Assessment staging incorporates the prognostic message obtainable from histochemical gastric mucin subtyping.

The severity of endoscopic gastric atrophy could help to predict Operative Link on Gastritis Assessment gastritis stage.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The aims of the present study were to evaluate the role of moderate-to-severe endoscopic gastric atrophy (EGA) on predicting Operative Link on Gastritis Assessment (OLGA) gastritis stage, and to assess the association of high-stage OLGA gastritis with gastric neoplasia in patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was carried out on 280 dyspeptic outpatients. EGA was assessed according to the Kimura-Takemoto classification. Gastritis stage was established according to the OLGA staging system and gastric neoplasia was assessed according to the Vienna classification. The pathologists who read the specimens were kept blind to the endoscopic results. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 46.1 years (range 20-78 years) with a male-to-female ratio of 1:1. High-stage gastritis (e.g. stage III or IV) was confirmed in 13 (4.6%) patients. All of these patients were more than 40 years-of-age (P = 0.01), had Helicobacter pylori infection (P = 0.0006) and moderate-to-severe EGA (P < 0.001). Low-grade dysplasia was found in seven patients: 4/13 (30.7%) with high-stage gastritis versus 3/267 (1.1%) with low-stage gastritis (P < 0.001). Six of these patients had moderate-to-severe EGA (P = 0.048). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of this endoscopic finding in high-stage gastritis diagnosis were 100%, 57.7%, 10.3% and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: OLGA high-stage gastritis was associated with gastric dysplasia and was mostly diagnosed in patients with moderate-to-severe EGA. The absence of this endoscopic finding could effectively rule out the possibility of having high-stage gastritis.

Serological assessment of gastric intestinal metaplasia and atrophy using pepsinogen-I, pepsinogen-II and gastrin-17 levels in a low incidence area of gastric cancer endemic for H. pylori infection.

BACKGROUND: Intestinal metaplasia (IM), a precursor of gastric cancer (GC), may be amenable to non-invasive assessment. AIMS: We evaluated the diagnostic utility of serum PG-I, PG-II, PG-I/PG-II ratio and gastrin-17 (G-17) to detect IM and atrophy. METHODS: The study was conducted at a tertiary care center located in low-incidence area of GC, endemic for H. pylori. The evaluation was designed as a prospective case-control study. Patients with GC and dyspepsia were evaluated by endoscopy, histology for IM (H&E, PAS and Alcian blue stains) and H. pylori (H&E and Giemsa stains), rapid urease test and IgG antibody (positive results in any two assays). Serum levels of PG-I, PG-II and G-17 were estimated using ELISA. RESULTS: Of the 98 patients with GC and 62 with dyspepsia, 35 (36%) and 9 (14%) had IM, respectively (p = 0.004). Patients with IM (n = 44) had lower PG-UPG-II ratio than those without IM (n = 116; median 4.4, 0.37-23.6 vs. 6.3, 0.19-38.6, respectively; p = 0.005). A cut-off value of PG-I/PG-II ratio of 6.0 had 64% sensitivity and 52% specificity for detecting IM (area under ROC curve 0.64). 26/44 (60%) patients with IM and 52/98 (53%) with GC had PG-I/PG-II ratio < 6. Serum G-17 was comparable among patients with and without IM. CONCLUSIONS: Though the PG-I/PG-II ratio was lower in patients with IM, only 60% had a lower ratio suggesting that this test and G-17 may not be useful to detect IM in low-incidence areas of GC, endemic for H. pylori infection.

Eradication of gastric cancer and more efficient gastric cancer surveillance in Japan: two peas in a pod.

We provide a historical review and update on current thinking regarding the possibility of elimination of gastric cancer from Japan. Because Helicobacter pylori infection is the cause gastric cancer, its elimination forms the cornerstone of eradication of gastric cancer. However, simply eradicating H. pylori from the entire population will not immediately solve the problem because many patients with H. pylori infections have already developed the precursor lesion, atrophic gastritis. Cure of H. pylori in these high risk patients will only reduce the risk of subsequent cancer. In contrast, treatment of low risk patients will prevent cancer. Thus, to eliminate gastric cancer it is necessary to identify and treat all infected individuals. In addition, those at increased risk for gastric cancer (i.e., atrophic gastritis irrespective of age) should be considered for endoscopic surveillance to identify those cancers that develop at an early stage. We propose that severity and extent of atrophy be used to separate those expected to benefit from endoscopy and annual surveillance from those with little or no potential benefit. We suggest an algorithm for eradicating gastric cancer that incorporates H. pylori and atrophic gastritis testing, H. pylori therapy, and surveillance to institute a program of surveillance restricted to those who could benefit most (i.e., those with moderate or severe atrophy). This will also allow a much closer matching of surveillance capacity and surveillance need making surveillance more clinically- and cost-effective.

Assessment of atrophic gastritis using the OLGA system.

BACKGROUND: An international group of gastroenterologists and pathologists (Operative Link for Gastritis Assessment (OLGA)) proposed the staging system of atrophy. The aim of this study was to assess the severity of atrophic gastritis using the OLGA system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The subjects comprised 163 H. pylori-positive patients: 18 with early gastric cancers of the intestinal type (GC), 55 with atrophic gastritis (AG), 49 with gastric ulcers or scars (GU), and 41 with duodenal ulcers or scars (DU). Biopsies were taken from the lesser and greater curvatures of the antrum and middle body. The OLGA gastritis stage (0-IV) (the severity and topography of atrophy) was obtained by combining antral with body atrophy scores. The gastritis grade (the severity and topography of inflammation) was obtained by combining antral and body inflammation scores. RESULTS: Most (84%) of patients with GC showed stage III or IV. Gastritis stages were significantly higher in patients with GC than in those with AG, GU, and DU. Gastritis stage became higher with age. Gastritis grades were slightly higher in patients with AG than in others. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that higher stages are found in patients with GC using the OLGA staging system and that the high risk of GC can be recognized. It is simple to use and useful for the assessment of the severity of atrophic gastritis.

Clinical usefulness of gastric-juice analysis in 2007: the stone that the builders rejected has become the cornerstone.

BACKGROUND: Gastric juice is usually discarded during upper-GI endoscopy. OBJECTIVE: By using a novel device, the Mt 21-42, we evaluated the potential of this important organic fluid in clinical practice, exploring its contribution to the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection and atrophic gastritis of the oxyntic mucosa (AGOM). DESIGN AND PATIENTS: A multicenter study (17,907 patients; 10 endoscopy units) estimated the frequency of diagnosis of AGOM and H pylori infection in routine endoscopic practice. A prospective study (216 patients) at 1 of these units aimed to determine the real prevalence of these conditions and the possible benefits of gastric juice analysis. We considered gastric juice pH and ammonium concentration, endoscopic and histologic features, serologic parameters for atrophy and H pylori, gastric acid secretion, and costs. RESULTS: We found that H pylori infection and, even more markedly, AGOM were greatly underdiagnosed in routine endoscopic practice (20.1% and 0.8% vs 49.1% and 12.5% in the prospective study, respectively), because of the intrinsic limitations of the conventional tests and lack/inappropriateness of biopsy planning. Gastric-juice analysis proved to be a cheap, simple, and effective way to prevent such underdiagnosis and allowed detection of atrophic gastritis and H pylori in 96% and 98% of cases, and saved costs (cost-effectiveness ratio 209 vs 274-5047). CONCLUSIONS: Gastric juice provided a valuable source of clinicopathologic information that, properly analyzed, allowed detection of the main risk factors for gastric cancer (H pylori and atrophic gastritis), overcoming the diagnostic limitations associated with these conditions and also producing time and cost savings.