Utilization and Outcomes of BRCA Genetic Testing and Counseling in a National Commercially Insured Population: The ABOUT Study.

IMPORTANCE: BRCA genetic testing has substantial public health impact, yet little is known of the real-world experiences of the more than 100 000 Americans undergoing testing annually. OBJECTIVE: To identify factors associated with use of BRCA testing, assess whether delivery of genetic counseling and testing services adheres to professional guidelines, and measure the impact on patient-reported outcomes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The American BRCA Outcomes and Utilization of Testing (ABOUT) Study analyzed data from a consecutive national series of 11 159 women whose clinicians ordered BRCA testing between December 2011 and December 2012. Aetna mailed recruitment information across the United States to commercial health plan members whose clinicians had ordered BRCA testing. A total of 3874 women (34.7%) completed questionnaires. Deidentified clinician-reported data from all respondents and a random sample of 2613 nonrespondents were also analyzed. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The proportion of eligible participants who met testing criteria and respondents' report of receiving genetic counseling by a genetics clinician and its association with BRCA knowledge, understanding, and satisfaction were assessed. RESULTS: Among 3628 women respondents whose clinicians ordered comprehensive BRCA testing, most were white non-Hispanic (2502 [69.0%]), college educated (2953 [81.4%]), married (2751 [75.8%]), and had higher incomes (2011 [55.4%]). Approximately 16.4% (596) did not meet testing criteria. Mutations were identified in 161 (5.3%) of these women who received comprehensive testing. Only 1334 (36.8%) reported receiving genetic counseling from a genetics clinician prior to testing; the lowest rates (130 [12.3%]) were among patients of obstetrician/gynecologists. The most commonly reported reason for not receiving this clinical service was lack of clinician recommendation. Those who received it demonstrated greater knowledge about BRCA (mean score difference adjusted for demographics and clinician specialty, ß = 0.99 [95% CI, 0.83-1.14]; P < .001) and expressed greater understanding (ß = 0.47 [95% CI, 0.41-0.54]; P < .001) and satisfaction (ß = 2.21 [95% CI, 1.60-2.81]; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Despite improved patient knowledge, understanding, and satisfaction among patients who receive genetic counseling provided by a genetics clinician, as well as multiple guidelines emphasizing the importance of genetic counseling, most US women undergoing BRCA genetic testing do not receive this clinical service. Lack of physician recommendation is the most commonly reported reason. These findings demonstrate important gaps in clinical genetics services. Recently mandated coverage of genetic counseling services as a preventive service without patient cost sharing should contribute to improving clinical genetics services and associated outcomes in the future.

Impact of direct-to-consumer advertising for hereditary breast cancer testing on genetic services at a managed care organization: a naturally-occurring experiment.

PURPOSE: To describe the impact of Myriad Genetics, Inc.'s direct-to-consumer advertising (DTC-ad) campaign on cancer genetic services within two Managed Care Organizations, Kaiser Permanente Colorado (KPCO), Denver, Colorado, where the ad campaign occurred, and Henry Ford Health System (HFHS), Detroit, Michigan, where there were no advertisements. METHODS: The main outcome measures were the changes in number and pretest mutation probability of referrals approved for cancer genetic services at KPCO and HFHS during the campaign versus the year prior, and mutation probability of those undergoing testing. RESULTS: At KPCO, referrals increased 244% during the DTC-ad compared to the same time period a year earlier (P value<0.001). The proportion of referrals at high pretest probability of a mutation (10% or greater) dropped from 69% the previous year to 48% during the campaign (P value<0.001). There was no significant change in pretest mutation probability among women who underwent testing between the two time periods. HFHS reported no significant change between the two time periods for numbers or mutation probability of referrals, or for mutation probability of women tested. CONCLUSION: The DTC-ad caused significant increase in demand for cancer genetic services. In the face of potential future DTC-ad for inherited cancer risk, providers and payers need to consider the delivery of genetic services and genetic education for persons of all risk levels.

Functional evaluation and cancer risk assessment of BRCA2 unclassified variants.

The influence of germ line BRCA2 unclassified variants (UCV), including missense mutations and in-frame deletions and insertions on BRCA2 function and on cancer risk, has not been defined although these mutations account for 43% of all identified BRCA2 sequence alterations. To investigate the effects of UCVs on BRCA2 function, we compared mutant and wild-type forms of BRCA2 using assays of cellular survival and viability, homologous recombination repair, and genome instability. We confirm that the effects of known deleterious mutations can be distinguished from neutral polymorphisms and wild-type BRCA2 in these assays, and we characterize the influence of a series of UCVs on BRCA2 function. We also describe how the results from the assays can be combined with data from analysis of cosegregation of the UCVs with cancer, co-occurrence of the UCVs with other deleterious mutations, and interspecies sequence variation in a comprehensive framework in an effort to better distinguish between disease predisposing and neutral UCVs. This combined approach represents a useful means of addressing the functional significance and cancer relevance of UCVs in BRCA2.

Breast and ovarian cancer genetics and prevention.

Inherited breast and ovarian cancers account for 10% of all breast and ovarian cancers. Relative to sporadic breast and ovarian cancers, these cancers tend to occur at an earlier age and grow more aggressively. Women with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations (BRCA1/2 mutation) have a 65% to 85% cumulative lifetime risk of developing invasive breast cancer and a 15% to 65% cumulative lifetime risk of developing invasive ovarian cancer. Identification of patients with the mutation is therefore crucial, because preventive measures such as prophylactic bilateral mastectomy, prophylactic bilateral salpingpo-oophorectomy and chemoprevention with Tamoxifen can prevent breast and ovarian cancer. Likewise, genetic counseling prior to testing is important, considering the major impact of the test results on an individual's life.