Long-Term Clinical Assessment of Two Modifications of Tunnel Technique in Treatment of Cairo Recession Type 1 in Lower Jaw.

AIM: The aim of this study is to compare long-term results after using an MCAT (Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel) with an SCTG (Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft) or an MCAT with CM (Collagen Matrices) in the treatment of Cairo recession Type 1 in mandibular single-rooted teeth. MATERIAL AND METHOD: The study encompassed 80 recessions in 18 patients for whom an MCAT was combined with CM on one side of the mandible and with an SCTG on the contralateral one. The following clinical parameters were measured: gingival recession height (GR) and width (RW), probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), width of keratinized tissue (KT), gingival thickness (GT), and mean (MRC). RESULTS: The MRC on the CM- and SCTG-treated sides was 55.25% and 82.35%, respectively. The SCTG side had a significantly greater improvement in MRC, GR, RW, KT, and GT compared to the CM side. The five-year results were stable relative to one-year observations. CONCLUSIONS: Both methods of treatment enable the achievement of stable long-term clinical results. Application of subepithelial connective tissue grafts is more effective relative to clinical parameters.

Comparative assessment between bio-adhesive material and silk suture in regard to healing, clinical attachment level and width of keratinized gingiva in gingival recession defects cases.

The objective of this study was to compare the silk suture with a cyanoacrylate adhesive to stabilize the free gingival graft in conjunction with Er: YAG laser-assisted recipient site preparation to augment the keratinized tissue in gingival recession cases. This randomized trial comprised of 300 recession defects patients. All the included patients were diagnosed using Miller class I and II gingival recession defects classification. Group I sites were treated with a free gingival graft (FGG) harvested using an Er: YAG laser and further sutured with silk. Group II sites were stabilized with isoamyl 2 cyanoacrylate bio-adhesive material. Clinical parameters, such as gingival recession depth, clinical attachment level, gain in gingival tissue thickness, and width of keratinized gingiva were recorded at baseline, and at third month, sixth month, and 12th month postoperatively. The mean changes in gingival recession from months 3 to 6 and months and 6 to 12 were significant (p < 0.05) in both groups. However, the improvement in recession depth was better in group II than in group I. The mean change in clinical attachment level did not differ significantly between the groups at the different time intervals. However, values tended to be higher in group II than in group I. The width of the keratinized gingiva tended to be higher from baseline to 3 months, baseline to 6 months, baseline to 12 months, 3 to 6 months, and from 6 to 12 months in group II as compared with group I (p > 0.05). Cyanoacrylate could be used as a substitute to silk sutures to stabilize FGGs. Cyanoacrylate was easy to apply, consumed less operating time, and was considered equally efficacious for stabilizing FGGs.

Soft tissue grafting to improve the attached mucosa at dental implants: A review of the literature and proposal of a decision tree.

BACKGROUND: Scientific data and clinical observations appear to indicate that an adequate width of attached mucosa may facilitate oral hygiene procedures thus preventing peri-implant inflammation and tissue breakdown (eg, biologic complications). Consequently, in order to avoid biologic complications and improve long-term prognosis, soft tissue conditions should be carefully evaluated when implant therapy is planned. At present the necessity and time-point for soft tissue grafting (eg, prior to or during implant placement or after healing) is still controversially discussed while clinical recommendations are vague. OBJECTIVES: To provide a review of the literature on the role of attached mucosa to maintain periimplant health, and to propose a decision tree which may help the clinician to select the appropriate surgical technique for increasing the width of attached mucosa. RESULTS: The available data indicate that ideally, soft tissue conditions should be optimized by various grafting procedures either before or during implant placement or as part of stage-two surgery. In cases, where, despite insufficient peri-implant soft tissue condition (ie, lack of attached mucosa or movements caused by buccal frena), implants have been uncovered and/or loaded, or in cases where biologic complications are already present (eg, mucositis, peri-implantitis), the treatment appears to be more difficult and less predictable. CONCLUSION: Soft tissue grafting may be important to prevent peri-implant tissue breakdown and should be considered when dental implants are placed. The presented decision tree may help the clinician to select the appropriate grafting technique.

A decision tree for soft tissue grafting.

Periodontal plastic surgery is commonly performed for esthetic and physiologic reasons, such as alleviating root sensitivity, root caries, and cervical abrasion and facilitating plaque control at the affected site. Currently, there is a lack of information regarding the most appropriate treatment method for the various clinical situations encountered. The aims of this paper are to review and discuss the various clinical situations that require soft tissue grafting and to attempt to provide recommendations for the most predictable technique. Using MEDLINE and The Cochrane Library, a review of all available literature was performed. Papers published in peer-reviewed journals written in English were chosen and reviewed to validate the decision-making process when planning for soft tissue grafting. A decision tree was subsequently developed to guide clinicians to choose the most appropriate soft tissue grafting procedure by taking into consideration the following clinical parameters: etiology, purpose of the procedure, adjacent interproximal bone level, and overlying tissue thickness. The decision tree proposed serves as a guide for clinicians to select the most appropriate and predictable soft tissue grafting procedure to minimize unnecessary mistakes while providing the ultimate desired treatment outcome.

Qualitative assessment of connective tissue graft with epithelial component. A microsurgical periodontal plastic surgical technique for soft tissue esthetics.

Connective tissue grafts have been used successfully in the treatment of gingival recession. In the mid 80s and late 90s, the periodontal literature presented various techniques such as free gingival grafts, pedicle flaps, subepithelial connective tissue grafts, acellular dermal matrix grafts, and guided tissue regeneration to cover denuded root surfaces. Currently, connective tissue grafting is a reliable treatment for esthetic root coverage. This paper presents a qualitative assessment of a surgical technique that uses a connective tissue graft, including a portion of epithelium in the shape of the defect. This procedure enhances the healing of the covered root surface, increases the thickness of the soft tissue and improves esthetics. The criteria used for evaluation were: color, volume, texture, and blending. This evaluation demonstrated encouraging results from an esthetic viewpoint.

Morbidity and economic complications following mucogingival surgery in a hemophiliac HIV-infected patient: a case report.

BACKGROUND: This report describes the surgical treatment of a gingival recession in a hemophiliac HIV-infected patient. To our knowledge, mucogingival surgery has not been described previously in these patients. METHODS: Under the supervision of the patient's hematologist, a subepithelial connective tissue graft procedure was carried out to treat the recession. The treatment was performed after substitution therapy with factor VIII concentrate, supported by local antifibrinolytic treatment with epsilonaminocaproic acid. RESULTS: One week after surgery, the grafted zone showed a normal healing, but an area of necrosis appeared at the donor palatal site with spontaneous bleeding. The administration of factor VIII concentrate had to be prolonged to arrest the hemorrhage. In total, 44,500 units of factor VIII concentrate were used, the cost of which reached around $20,000. After 1 month the donor site had re-epithelialized by secondary intention. The root coverage was around 85% successful. CONCLUSIONS: Because of the surgical risk and the high economic cost in the use of the factor VIII concentrate, we do not recommend performing mucogingival surgery in HIV-infected hemophiliacs unless it is absolutely necessary. Prevention and early treatment must be the goal in the management of these patients.

Intra- and inter-examiner reproducibility in keratinized tissue width assessment with 3 methods for mucogingival junction determination.

BACKGROUND: Although the need for "adequate" amount of keratinized tissue (KT) for periodontal health is questionable, the mucogingival junction (MGJ) often serves as a measurement landmark in periodontal evaluations. Limited information is available on the reproducibility of KT width (KTW) assessment. The purpose of this study was to assess intra- and inter-examiner reproducibility in measuring KTW by using 3 different methods to identify MGJ location. METHODS: Fifteen patients provided 17 teeth which had undergone a gingival augmentation procedure (connective tissue graft; surgery group) and an equal number of contralateral, non-treated teeth (control group). At the midbuccal aspect of each tooth, KTW was assessed by 2 independent examiners after MGJ identification by the visual (VM), functional (FM), and visual with histochemical staining (HM) method. Data analysis was based on intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) and 3-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for differences between replicate measurements. RESULTS: KTW was significantly different between treated and control teeth. No significant differences in KTW were found in relation to method for MGJ determination and examiner. Intra- and inter-examiner reproducibility was high, regardless of treatment status or method for MGJ determination (ICC = 0.92 - 0.99). Standard deviations of the difference between replicate measurements ranged from 0.46 mm for VM to 0.21 mm for HM. CONCLUSIONS: Intra- and inter-examiner reproducibility has been shown to be substantially consistent when different methods for MGJ determination are used to measure the apico-coronal dimension of the gingiva. The level of reproducibility does not seem to be affected whether or not the mucogingival complex has been surgically altered by a gingival augmentation procedure.

Soft tissue correction of a single-tooth pontic space: a comparative quantitative volume assessment.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Various augmentation procedures are recommended for the correction of localized alveolar ridge defects. However, no study has quantitatively evaluated the results of these procedures to date. PURPOSE: This study compared 2 soft tissue augmentation surgeries commonly used to alter contours of single-tooth pontic space by quantifying 3-dimensional volume changes with the optical projection Moiré method at 1 and 3.5 months after surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-four patients required surgery. Each patient had a localized alveolar ridge defect, corresponding to a mesial-distal width of 1 single tooth. The defect of 12 patients was corrected with a subepithelial connective tissue graft; the remaining 12 patients were treated by receiving a free full-thickness gingival graft, which included epithelium and connective tissue with fatty tissue. Six unoperated defects of 6 patients formed the control group. For each defect, an impression was made before treatment, at 1 and 3.5 months after surgery to measure the volume changes on the dental casts with a validated projection Moiré system. Volume change was assessed relative to the preoperative dimension at the buccal and crestal aspects of the single-tooth pontic space. RESULTS: At 3.5 months postsurgery, mean volumetric gain for the connective tissue group with 159 mm(3) (SD +/- 80) was significantly greater (P =.027) than for free full-thickness gingival graft group with 104 mm(3) (SD +/- 31). CONCLUSION: The applied projection Moiré method proved its applicability in assessing 3-dimensional volume changes of pontic spaces with a single-tooth width. Volumetric assessment after 1 and 3.5 months revealed significantly greater volume gain with the subepithelial connective tissue graft in comparison to the free full-thickness gingival graft.

Potential of gingival connective tissue to induce keratinization of an alveolar mucosal flap: a long-term histologic and clinical assessment. Case report.

A maxillary canine and premolar showed a 3.0- to 4.0-mm-deep and 3.0- to 4.0-mm-wide recession defect with 2.0- to 3.0-mm zone of attached gingiva. The denuded root surfaces were covered with nonkeratinized alveolar mucosa in a slightly modified bridge flap technique. The coronal displacement of a nonkeratinized alveolar mucosal flap onto a bed of collagenous gingival connective tissue resulted in the development of keratinized epithelium in the previously nonkeratinized mucosa. This was caused by the inductive stimuli of the underlying tissue and observed in the 6-month specimen. The alveolar mucosa displayed its transformed epithelial structural pattern only in segments, achieving full differentiation of its basal complex over a 10-year period, as demonstrated clinically and histologically.

Quantitative assessment of free gingival grafts with and without periosteum and osseous perforation.

Forty free gingival grafts were performed on 5 adult Rhesus monkeys as follows: 10 grafts were placed on recipient sites with periosteum; 10 grafts on periosteum and perforated cortical plate; 10 grafts on bared bone; and 10 grafts on perforated bared bone. All free autografts (7 X 5 X 1 mm) were taken from the palatal mucosa and were sutured in place. Clinical evaluation and photographs were taken at 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24 weeks postoperatively. At 24 weeks, a device was used to measure quantitatively the amount of force necessary to pull the graft 2 mm away from the underlying bone. Biopsy of two grafts of each type were taken for histologic examination. The following conclusions were drawn: 1. There was no difference in the survival or healing pattern of grafts placed on periosteum and grafts placed on bared bone.