Population Pharmacokinetics and Dosing Optimization of Gentamicin in Critically Ill Patients Undergoing Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy.

PURPOSE: Appropriate gentamicin dosing in continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) patients remains undefined. This study aimed to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model of gentamicin in CRRT patients and to infer the optimal dosing regimen for gentamicin. METHODS: Fourteen CRRT patients dosed with gentamicin were included to establish a population PK model to characterize the variabilities and influential covariates of gentamicin. The pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target attainment and risk of toxicity for different combinations of gentamicin regimens (3-7 mg/kg q24h) and CRRT effluent doses (30-50 mL/h/kg) were evaluated by Monte Carlo simulation. The probability of target attainment (PTA) was determined for the PK/PD indices of the ratio of drug peak concentration/minimum inhibitory concentration (Cmax/MIC > 10) and the ratio of area under the drug concentration-time curve/MIC over 24 h (AUC0-24h/MIC > 100), and the risk of toxicity was estimated by drug trough concentration thresholds (1 and 2 mg/L). RESULTS: A one-compartment model adequately described the PK characteristics of gentamicin. Covariates including body weight, age, gender, and CRRT modality did not influence the PK parameters of gentamicin based on our dataset. All studied gentamicin regimens failed to achieve satisfactory PTAs for pathogens with an MIC ≥2 mg/L. A good balance of PK/PD target attainment and risk of toxicity (>2 mg/L) was achieved under 7 mg/kg gentamicin q24h and 40 mL/kg/h CRRT dose for an MIC ≤1 mg/L. CRRT dose intensity had a significant impact on the target attainment of AUC0-24h/MIC >100 and risk of toxicity. CONCLUSION: A combination of 7 mg/kg gentamicin q24h and 40 mL/kg/h CRRT dose might be considered as a starting treatment option for CRRT patients, and drug monitoring is required to manage toxicity.

Optimizing gentamicin dosing in different pediatric age groups using population pharmacokinetics and Monte Carlo simulation.

INTRODUCTION: The use of once daily dosing of aminoglycosides in pediatrics is increasing but studies on dose optimization targeting the pediatric population are limited. This study aimed to derive a population pharmacokinetic model of gentamicin and apply it to design optimal dosing regimens in pediatrics. METHODS: Population pharmacokinetics of gentamicin in pediatrics was described from a retrospective chart review of plasma gentamicin concentration data (peak/ trough levels) of pediatric patients (1 month - 12 years), admitted to non-critically ill pediatrics. Monte Carlo simulations were performed on the resulting pharmacokinetic model to assess the probability of achieving a Cmax/MIC target of 10 mg/L over a range of gentamicin MICs of 0.5-2 mg/L and once daily gentamicin dosing regimens. RESULTS: A two-compartment model with additive residual error best described the model with weight incorporated as a significant covariate for both clearance and volume of distribution. Monte Carlo simulations demonstrated a good probability of target attainment even at a MIC of 2 mg/L, where neonates required doses of 6-7 mg/kg/day and older pediatrics required lower daily doses of 4-5 mg/kg/day while maintaining trough gentamicin concentration below the toxicity limit of 1 mg/L. CONCLUSION: Once daily dosing is a reasonable option in pediatrics that allows target attainment while maintaining trough gentamicin level below the limits of toxicity.

Stimulus Responsive Ocular Gentamycin-Ferrying Chitosan Nanoparticles Hydrogel: Formulation Optimization, Ocular Safety and Antibacterial Assessment.

PURPOSE: The present study was designed to study the gentamycin (GTM)-loaded stimulus-responsive chitosan nanoparticles to treat bacterial conjunctivitis. METHODS: GTM-loaded chitosan nanoparticles (GTM-CHNPs) were prepared by ionotropic gelation method and further optimized by 3-factor and 3-level Box-Behnken design. Chitosan (A), sodium tripolyphosphate (B), and stirring speed (C) were selected as independent variables. Their effects were observed on particle size (PS as Y1), entrapment efficiency (EE as Y2), and loading capacity (LC as Y3). RESULTS: The optimized formulation showed the particle size, entrapment efficiency, and loading capacity of 135.2±3.24 nm, 60.18±1.65%, and 34.19±1.17%, respectively. The optimized gentamycin-loaded chitosan nanoparticle (GTM-CHNPopt) was further converted to the stimulus-responsive sol-gel system (using pH-sensitive carbopol 974P). GTM-CHNPopt sol-gel (NSG5) exhibited good gelling strength and sustained release (58.99±1.28% in 12h). The corneal hydration and histopathology of excised goat cornea revealed safe to the cornea. It also exhibited significant (p<0.05) higher ZOI than the marketed eye drop. CONCLUSION: The finding suggests that GTM-CHNP-based sol-gel is suitable for ocular delivery to enhance the corneal contact time and improved patient compliance.

Population pharmacokinetics of gentamicin in haemodialysis patients: modelling, simulations and recommendations.

PURPOSE: The usual recommended dose for gentamicin is 3 to 7 mg/kg/day for patients with a normal renal function while 1.7 mg/kg/day is recommended for patients undergoing chronic haemodialysis. The objectives of this study were to develop a population pharmacokinetics model (POPPK) for gentamicin, designed for patients undergoing dialysis, and to investigate the best dosing scheme for different MIC clinical breakpoints using Monte Carlo simulations. METHODS: In this monocentric prospective interventional open clinical study, 23 patients (141 gentamicin samples) were included. The covariates investigated were weight, creatinine, dialysis (yes/no), dialysis flow and dialysis duration. The POPPK model was developed in Pmetrics and 1000 time-concentration profiles were simulated for 9 doses between 2 and 10 mg/kg/day, with an inter-dose period of 24, 48 or 96 h to predict the probability of having both a serum peak > 8*MIC and a trough < 1 mg/L for MIC values between 0.25 and 4 mg/L. RESULTS: A two-compartment model including the dialysis on the elimination constant and bodyweight on the volume of distribution best described the data. A 30-min gentamicin infusion of 2 mg/kg/day (for MIC = 1 mg/L) or 8 mg/kg/day (for MIC = 4 mg/L) just before dialysis eliminated by two dialysis sessions before the next administration (dose interval of at least 96 h) led to a peak > 8*MIC for > 90% of the simulations and a trough concentration < 1 mg/L at 96 h for 92% and 34% respectively. CONCLUSION: The gentamicin dose generally used to treat infections in dialysis patients is insufficient and might be increased to 3-8 mg/kg/day just before dialysis, taking into account the type of infection.

Dose Optimization of Gentamicin in Critically Ill Neonates.

BACKGROUND: Appropriate dosing of gentamicin in critically ill neonates is still debated. OBJECTIVE: To assess the peak concentration (Cmax) and area-under-the-time-concentration curve (AUC0-24) of gentamicin and to simulate the recommended doses using the Monte Carlo method. METHODS: This was a retrospective study on critically ill neonates carried over a one-year period. The demographic characteristics, dosage regimen and gentamicin concentrations were recorded for each neonate. Using Bayesian pharmacokinetic modeling, Cmax and AUC0-24 were predicted. Dose recommendations for the target Cmax (µg/ml) of 12 were obtained, and Monte Carlo simulation (100,000 iterations) was used for predicting the pharmacokinetic parameters and recommended doses for various birth weight categories. RESULTS: Eighty-two critically ill neonates (with an average gestational age of 33.7 weeks; and birth weight of 2.1 kg) were recruited. Higher Cmax and AUC0-24 values were predicted in premature neonates, with greater cumulative AUCs in extremely preterm neonates. The average administered dose was 4 mg/kg/day and 75% of the participants had Cmax greater than 12 µg/ml following a single dose, and 85% were found to be at steady state. On the contrary, only 25% of the study population had the recommended AUC0-24 (above 125 µg-hr/ml). Simulation tests indicate that 90% of the critically ill neonates would achieve recommended Cmax with doses ranging between 5 and 6 mg/kg/day. CONCLUSION: Currently used dose of 4 mg/kg/day is adequate to maintain Cmax in a large majority of the study population, with one-fourth population reporting the recommended AUC0-24. Increasing the dose to 5-6 mg/kg/day will more likely help to achieve both the recommended Cmax and AUC0-24 values.

Assessment of visual sensation, psychiatric profile and quality of life following vestibular schwannoma surgery in patients prehabituated by chemical vestibular ablation.

AIMS: Preoperative chemical vestibular ablation can reduce vestibular symptoms in patients who have gone through vestibular schwannoma resection. The goal of this study was to determine whether chemical vestibular prehabituation influences the patients' post-operative perception of visual stimulation, mental status and quality of life. We also tried to find out whether increases of optokinetic nystagmus, measured by routine electronystagmography, correlate with subjective symptoms. METHODS: We preoperatively administered (2 months prior to surgery) 0.5 - 1.0 mL of 40 mg/mL nonbuffered gentamicin in three intratympanic instillations in 11 patients. Head impulse and caloric tests confirmed reduction of vestibular function in all patients. The control group consisted of 21 patients. Quality of life in both groups was evaluated using the Glasgow Benefit Inventory, the Glasgow Health Status Inventory and the Dizziness Handicap Inventory questionnaires. Visual symptoms and optokinetic sensation were evaluated using a specific questionnaire developed by our team and by measuring gains preoperatively and postoperatively in both groups using routine electronystagmography. The psychological profile was evaluated using the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale and the Generalised Anxiety Disorder Assessment questionnaires. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between both groups with regards to the results of the questionnaires. Patients who received preoperative gentamicin were less sensitive to visual stimulation (P<0.10) and many of them had a significantly higher gain in the optokinetic nystagmus than the control group in the preoperative stage. CONCLUSION: Pre-treatment with gentamicin helps to lower anxiety levels in patients and improves their general postoperative status. Pre-treated patients are also less sensitive to optokinetic stimulation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03638310.

Is computer-assisted aminoglycoside dosing managed by a pharmacist a safety tool of pharmacotherapy?

This pilot prospective study verified the hypothesis that use of computer-assisted therapeutic drug monitoring of aminoglycosides by pharmacists leads to better safety therapeutic outcomes and cost avoidance than only concentration measurement and dose adjustments based on a physician's experience. Two groups of patients were enrolled according to the technique of monitoring. Patients (Group 1, n=52) underwent monitoring by a pharmacist using pharmacokinetic software. In a control group (Group 2, n=11), plasma levels were measured but not interpreted by the pharmacist, only by physicians. No statistically significant differences were found between the groups in factors influenced by therapy. However, the results are not statistically significant but a comparison of the groups showed a clear trend towards safety and cost avoidance, thus supporting therapeutic drug monitoring. Safety limits were achieved in 76 % and 63 % of cases in Groups 1 and 2, respectively. More patients achieved both concentrations (peak and trough) with falling eGFR in Group 1. In present pilot study, the pharmacist improved the care of patients on aminoglycoside therapy. A larger study is needed to demonstrate statistically significantly improved safety and cost avoidance of aminoglycoside therapy monitoring by the pharmacist using pharmacokinetic software.

Optimizing gentamicin conventional and extended interval dosing in neonates using Monte Carlo simulation - a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Although aminoglycosides are routinely used in neonates, controversy exists regarding empiric dosing regimens. The objectives were to determine gentamicin pharmacokinetics in neonates, and develop initial mg/kg dosing recommendations that optimized target peak and trough concentration attainment for conventional and extended-interval dosing (EID) regimens. METHODS: Patient demographics and steady-state gentamicin concentration data were retrospectively collected for 60 neonates with no renal impairment admitted to a level III neonatal intensive care unit. Mean pharmacokinetics were calculated and multiple linear regression was performed to determine significant covariates of clearance (L/h) and volume of distribution (L). Classification and regression tree (CART) analysis identified breakpoints for significant covariates. Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) was used to determine optimal dosing recommendations for each CART-identified sub-group. RESULTS: Gentamicin clearance and volume of distribution were significantly associated with weight at gentamicin initiation. CART-identified breakpoints for weight at gentamicin initiation were: ≤ 850 g, 851-1200 g, and > 1200 g. MCS identified that a conventional dose of gentamicin 3.5 mg/kg given every 48 h or an EID of 8-9 mg/kg administered every 72 h in neonates weighing ≤ 850 g, and every 24 and 48 h, respectively, in neonates weighing 851-1200 g, provided the best probability of attaining conventional (peak: 5-10 mg/L and trough: ≤ 2 mg/L) and EID targets (peak:12-20 mg/L, trough:≤ 0.5 mg/L). Insufficient sample size in the > 1200 g neonatal group precluded further investigation of this weight category. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides initial gentamicin dosing recommendations that optimize target attainment for conventional and EID regimens in neonates weighing ≤ 1200 g. Prospective validation and empiric dose optimization for neonates > 1200 g is needed.

Optimizing Gentamicin Dosing in Pediatrics Using Monte Carlo Simulations.

Gentamicin is known to have concentration-dependent bactericidal activity, and its nephrotoxic effect is well described. We developed a population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model to optimize gentamicin dosing in pediatrics. Data were retrospectively collected for pediatric patients 1 month to 12 years of age, admitted to general pediatric wards or intensive care units and received gentamicin for suspected or proven Gram-negative infections at King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. A total of 306 gentamicin peak and trough concentrations sets from 107 patients were analyzed with mean (±standard deviation) patient age and weight of 4.5 ± 3.5 years and 16.7 ± 10.8 kg, respectively. Gentamicin pharmacokinetics were adequately described with a one compartment system (R = 0.82, bias = 1.75% and precision = 88% for population predictions and R = 0.94, bias = 5% and precision = 29% for individual predictions). The gentamicin pharmacokinetic parameters were as follows: volume of distribution = 8.9 L, total body clearance = 2.8 L/h for a 20-kg patient. Monte Carlo simulations showed that doses of 5-6 mg/kg/dose once daily are adequate only to treat infections with Gram-negative organisms having minimal inhibitory concentration less than 1 µg/mL. While, at minimal inhibitory concentration of 1 µg/mL, higher doses (7-8 mg/kg/dose once daily) are needed to maximize the efficacy of gentamicin. However, at minimal inhibitory concentration of 2 µg/mL, even a 10 mg/kg dose showed poor target attainment (52%). The finding of this study highlights the need to reevaluate the current breakpoints of gentamicin and also to assess the safety of higher doses of gentamicin in pediatrics.

No role for patient body weight on renal function assessment for drug dosing.

Objectives: To evaluate the ability of body-weight-driven renal function assessment (RFA) formulae to predict on-target elimination rate ranges for gentamicin in patients with varying degrees of renal function. Methods: A 6 year retrospective pharmacokinetic study was conducted at a university teaching hospital. Results: A total of 85 patients met the inclusion criteria and 127 pharmacokinetic files were analysed from patients on medical-surgical wards (53%) and medical-surgical ICUs (13%) receiving intravenous gentamicin for treatment, as well as those for patients receiving it for surgical prophylaxis (34%). Each RFA formula was examined against standard dosing tables for gentamicin. A table of acceptable elimination rates was generated using a traditional peak of 8 mg/L and trough between 0.5 and 2 mg/L associated with each of the dosing interval extensions. The ability of each RFA formula to select on-target elimination rates was evaluated. The RFA formula assuming a normalized body weight of 72 kg and a modified creatinine reagent adjustment factor of 90% provided the most accurate on-target elimination rate selection. This method was superior to dosing interval selection based on the Modification in Diet Renal Disease (MDRD) formula, Sanford's guide method, as well as the Cockcroft-Gault formulae using total body weight, ideal body weight or lean body weight ( P < 0.0001). Conclusions: Based on the use of gentamicin as a surrogate guide for renally adjusted drugs, these results support dosing interval selection based on a normalized body weight method and a formula reagent adjustment factor of 90% within the Cockcroft-Gault formula.

Population pharmacokinetic modelling, Monte Carlo simulation and semi-mechanistic pharmacodynamic modelling as tools to personalize gentamicin therapy.

Population pharmacokinetic modelling, Monte Carlo simulation and semi-mechanistic pharmacodynamic modelling are all tools that can be applied to personalize gentamicin therapy. This review summarizes and evaluates literature knowledge on the population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of gentamicin and identifies areas where further research is required to successfully individualize gentamicin therapy using modelling and simulation techniques. Thirty-five studies have developed a population pharmacokinetic model of gentamicin and 15 studies have made dosing recommendations based on Monte Carlo simulation. Variability in gentamicin clearance was most commonly related to renal function in adults and body weight and age in paediatrics. Nine studies have related aminoglycoside exposure indices to clinical outcomes. Most commonly, efficacy has been linked to a Cmax/MIC ≥7-10 and a AUC24/MIC ≥70-100. No study to date has shown a relationship between predicted achievement of exposure targets and actual clinical success. Five studies have developed a semi-mechanistic pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model to predict bacteria killing and regrowth following gentamicin exposure and one study has developed a deterministic model of aminoglycoside nephrotoxicity. More complex semi-mechanistic models are required that consider the immune response, use of multiple antibiotics, the severity of illness, and both efficacy and toxicity. As our understanding grows, dosing of gentamicin based on sound pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic principles should be applied more commonly in clinical practice.

Gentamicin versus ceftriaxone for the treatment of gonorrhoea (G-TOG trial): study protocol for a randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: Gonorrhoea is a common sexually transmitted infection which causes genital pain and discomfort; in women it can also lead to pelvic inflammatory disease and infertility, and in men to epididymo-orchitis. Current treatment is with ceftriaxone, but there is increasing evidence of antimicrobial resistance which is reducing its effectiveness against gonorrhoea. A small, but increasing, number of patients have already been found to have highly resistant strains of gonorrhoea which has been associated with clinical failure. This trial aims to determine whether gentamicin is not clinically worse than ceftriaxone in the treatment of gonorrhoea. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a blinded, two-arm, multicentre, noninferiority randomised trial. Patients are eligible if they are aged 16-70 years with a diagnosis of genital, pharyngeal and/or rectal gonorrhoea. Exclusion criteria are: known concurrent sexually transmitted infection(s) (excluding chlamydia); bacterial vaginosis and/or Trichomonas vaginalis infection; contraindications or an allergy to gentamicin, ceftriaxone, azithromycin or lidocaine; pregnancy or breastfeeding; complicated gonorrhoeal infection; weight under 40 kg; use of ceftriaxone, gentamicin or azithromycin within the preceding 28 days. Randomisation is to receive a single intramuscular injection of either gentamicin or ceftriaxone, all participants receive 1 g oral azithromycin as standard treatment. The estimated sample size is 720 participants (noninferiority limit 5%). The primary outcome is clearance of Neisseria gonorrhoeae at all infected sites by a negative Nucleic Acid Amplification Test, 2 weeks post treatment. Secondary outcomes include clinical resolution of symptoms, frequency of adverse events, tolerability of therapy, relationship between clinical effectiveness and antibiotic minimum inhibitory concentration for N. gonorrhoeae, and cost-effectiveness. DISCUSSION: The options for future treatment of gonorrhoea are limited. Results from this randomised trial will demonstrate whether gentamicin is not clinically worse than ceftriaxone for the treatment of gonorrhoea. This will inform clinical practice and policy for the treatment of gonorrhoea when current therapy with cephalosporins is no longer effective, or is contraindicated. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number - ISRCTN51783227 , Registered on 18 September 2014. Current protocol version 2.0 17 June 2015.

Integrated pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling to evaluate antimicrobial prophylaxis in abdominal surgery.

OBJECTIVES: To use Monte Carlo simulation with an integrated pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) model to evaluate guideline-recommended antimicrobial prophylaxis (AP) regimens with anaerobic coverage in abdominal surgery. METHODS: AP regimens were tested in simulated subjects undergoing elective abdominal surgery using relevant PK models and pathogen distributions in surgical site infections (SSIs). Predicted cumulative target attainment was the percentage of simulated subjects with free (unbound) antimicrobial plasma concentrations above the MICs for potential SSI pathogens. RESULTS: Cefazolin plus metronidazole covered SSI aerobes in 70% and the Bacteroides fragilis group in 99% of subjects, whereas cefoxitin only covered aerobes and anaerobes in 63% and 27% of cases, respectively. The broad-spectrum ceftriaxone plus metronidazole covered aerobes in 82% and anaerobes in 99% of simulations, while ertapenem covered aerobes in 88% and anaerobes in 90% of cases. Clindamycin covered the B. fragilis group in only 11% of cases. For cefazolin, 2 g doses maintained target attainment in simulated subjects from 80 to 120 kg, whereas 1 g doses were associated with lower target attainment against potential Gram-negative pathogens even in those <80 kg. For gentamicin, 3 mg/kg doses were comparable to the suggested 5 mg/kg, but superior to the traditional 1.5 mg/kg. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the use of PK-PD to inform decisions regarding AP in abdominal surgery. In this case, the findings support avoiding cefoxitin, avoiding clindamycin for anaerobic coverage, selecting 2 g doses of cefazolin even in patients <80 kg and using 3 mg/kg doses of gentamicin.

Assessment of the National French recommendations regarding the dosing regimen of 8mg/kg of gentamicin in patients hospitalised in intensive care units.

INTRODUCTION: To assess the French National Agency for Medicines and Health Products Safety (ANSM) guidelines concerning the peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of gentamicin when using a loading dose of 8mg/kg administered in patients hospitalised in the intensive care unit (ICU). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective observational cohort study conducted in one ICU. RESULTS: During the study period, 34 patients with a median simplified acute physiology score 2 of 54 [44-70] received a median dose of 8 [7.9-8.1] mg/kg of gentamicin. The median Cmax was 17.5 [15.4-20.7] mg/L and no patient had a Cmax>30mg/L. Twenty-four of 34 patients (71%) had a Cmax>16mg/L. Following multivariate analysis, the only factor associated with Cmax<16mg/L was a positive fluid balance 24hours before gentamicin administration (per 1000mL increment) (OR: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.18-0.77, P=0.008). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that a Cmax>30mg/L [which corresponds to approximately 8 times the minimal inhibiting concentrations (MIC) breakpoints for Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacteriaceae with intermediate sensitivity] of gentamicin as recommended by ANSM guidelines seems impossible to obtain with a loading dose of 8mg/kg in the ICU. A loading dose of 8mg/kg should probably not be used in the empiric antibiotic treatment of infection due to non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli and Enterobacteriaceae with intermediate sensitivity whose MIC breakpoint is 4mg/L. A Cmax>16mg/L was not reached in almost 30% of patients, particularly in the group with a positive fluid balance who require higher doses than currently recommended.

Extended-interval gentamicin administration in neonates: a simplified approach.

OBJECTIVE: Gentamicin dosing is highly variable and remains complicated in the neonatal population. Traditional dosing in our unit resulted in an excessive number of elevated trough serum gentamicin levels. We hypothesized that one uniform gentamicin dose for neonates of all gestational ages will reduce the incidence of elevated trough levels from 50 to 10%. STUDY DESIGN: Our prospective, randomized, controlled trial enrolled eligible neonates into two groups, according to gestational age (⩽34 6/7 (group I) and >35 0/7 weeks (group II)). Patients in the study arm received a dose of gentamicin 5 mg kg(-1) intravenous (i.v.) every 36 h, whereas patients in the control arm received traditional dosage. Patients were monitored for resolution of infection, serum gentamicin levels and adverse effects. We confirmed our findings in a follow-up study. Fisher's exact and Mann-Whitney tests were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: We enrolled 96 neonates, 50 in group I (n=25 per arm) and 46 in group II (n=23 per arm). Elevated trough levels were reduced by 66% in group I (P=0.61) and 100% in group II (P=0.0015). In the study arm of both groups, 48/49 neonates had Cmin serum gentamicin concentration (SGC) <2 mg l(-1) and the majority had a trough SGC <1 mg l(-1) (P<0.0001). The study dose resulted in maximum gentamicin levels in the goal range and a 50% reduction in dosage modifications. There were no treatment failures or adverse effects. Our follow-up study phase confirmed these results. CONCLUSION: A standardized gentamicin dosage of 5 mg kg(-1) i.v. every 36 h to neonates of all gestational ages was safe and resulted in SGCs in goal therapeutic ranges. The implications of this simplified gentamicin dosage are to reduce health-care costs by less frequent dosing of gentamicin and reducing medication errors in physician prescribing from complicated dosing schemes.

Assessment of Vestibulo-oculomotor Reflex in Ménière's Disease: Defining an Instrumental Profile.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze and compare, in two groups of patients affected by definite Ménière's disease (MD) but treated differently, the Video Head Impulse Test findings especially by putting them in relationship with canal paresis, hearing loss, and duration of the disease. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. PATIENTS: Seventy patients affected by unilateral definite MD (16 in Group 1 and 54 in Group 2) observed between March 2014 and May 2015 in a tertiary referral center were retrospectively studied and then divided into two groups: Group 1 was previously treated with intratympanic gentamicin, whereas Group 2 underwent only a conservative therapy. Instrumental tests included audiometry, caloric test, and Video Head Impulse Test. All the findings were statistically analyzed; significance was set at p = 0.005. INTERVENTION: Diagnostic. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: If MD is treated conservatively the high-frequency vestibulo-oculomotor reflex gain determined with Video Head Impulse Test is normal; it is pathological if MD is treated with gentamicin. RESULTS: High-frequency vestibulo-oculomotor reflex gain showed a statistically significant reduction in Group 1; at the same time, it showed no correlation in both groups with hearing loss, duration of disease or canal paresis. CONCLUSION: High-frequency vestibulo-oculomotor reflex is naturally preserved even in late stage MD if the patient has been treated conservatively; the dissociation between Caloric Test and Video Head Impulse Test findings could be considered an instrumental hallmark of MD. Gentamicin significantly reduces high-frequency vestibulo-oculomotor reflex gain: this reduction can be taken into account when determining the effectiveness of an ablative treatment.

Pre-packing of cost effective antibiotic cement beads for the treatment of traumatic osteomyelitis in the developing world - an in-vitro study based in Cambodia.

The developing world often lacks the resources to effectively treat the most serious injuries including osteomyelitis following open fractures or surgical fracture treatment. Antibiotic cement beads are a widely accepted method of delivering antibiotics locally to the infected area following trauma. This study is based in Cambodia, a low income country struggling to recover from a recent genocide. The study aims to test the effectiveness of locally made antibiotic beads and analyse their effectiveness after being gas sterilised, packaged and kept in storage Different antibiotic beads were manufactured locally using bone cement and tested against MRSA bacteria grown from a case of osteomyelitis. Each antibiotic was tested before and after a process of gas sterilisation as well as later being tested after storage in packaging up to 42 days. The gentamicin, vancomycin, amikacin and ceftriaxone beads all inhibited growth of the MRSA on the TSB and agar plates, both before and after gas sterilisation. All four antibiotics continued to show similar zones of inhibition after 42 days of storage. The results show significant promise to produce beads with locally obtainable ingredients in an austere environment and improve cost effectiveness by storing them in a sterilised condition.

Interventions for hidradenitis suppurativa: a Cochrane systematic review incorporating GRADE assessment of evidence quality.

More than 50 interventions have been used to treat hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), and so therapy decisions can be challenging. Our objective was to summarize and appraise randomized controlled trial (RCT) evidence for HS interventions in adults. Searches were conducted in Medline, Embase, CENTRAL, LILACS, five trials registers and abstracts from eight dermatology conferences until 13 August 2015. Two review authors independently assessed study eligibility, extracted data and assessed methodological quality. Primary outcomes were quality of life and adverse effects of the interventions. Twelve trials, from 1983 to 2015, investigating 15 different interventions met our inclusion criteria. The median trial duration was 16 weeks and the median number of participants was 27. Adalimumab 40 mg weekly improved the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) by 4·0 points, which equates to the minimal clinically important difference for the scale, compared with placebo (95% confidence interval -6·5 to -1·5 points). Evidence quality was reduced to 'moderate' because the results are based on only a single study. Adalimumab 40 mg every other week was ineffective in a meta-analysis of two studies comprising 124 participants. Infliximab 5 mg kg(-1) improved the DLQI score by 8·4 points after 8 weeks in a moderate-quality study completed by 33 of 38 participants. Etanercept 50 mg twice weekly was ineffective. Inclusion of a gentamicin sponge prior to primary closure did not improve outcomes. Other interventions, including topical and oral antibiotics, were investigated by relatively small studies, preventing treatment recommendations due to imprecision. More, larger RCTs are required to investigate most HS interventions, particularly oral treatments and surgical therapy. Moderate-quality evidence suggests that adalimumab given weekly and infliximab are effective, whereas adalimumab every other week is ineffective.