Assuntos
Consultores , Avaliação Geriátrica , Geriatras/normas , Conduta do Tratamento Medicamentoso/normas , Cuidado Transicional/normas , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Geriatras/tendências , Humanos , Masculino , Conduta do Tratamento Medicamentoso/tendências , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Cuidado Transicional/tendênciasRESUMO
The dramatic increase in prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) with ageing makes the recognition and correct referral of these patients of paramount relevance in order to implement interventions preventing or delaying the development of CKD complications and end-stage renal disease. Nevertheless, several issues make the diagnosis of CKD in the elderly cumbersome. Among these are age related changes in structures and functions of the kidney, which may be difficult to distinguish from CKD, and multimorbidity. Thus, symptoms, clinical findings and laboratory abnormalities should be considered as potential clues to suspect CKD and to suggest screening. Comprehensive geriatric assessment is essential to define the clinical impact of CKD on functional status and to plan treatment. Correct patient referral is very important: patients with stage 4-5 CKD, as well as those with worsening proteinuria or progressive nephropathy (i.e. eGFR reduction > 5 ml/year) should be referred to nephrologist. Renal biopsy not unfrequently may be the key diagnostic exam and should not be denied simply on the basis of age. Indeed, identifying the cause(s) of CKD is highly desirable to perform a targeted therapy against the pathogenetic mechanisms of CKD, which complement and may outperform in efficacy the general measures for CKD.
Assuntos
Avaliação Geriátrica , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde/normas , Avaliação das Necessidades/normas , Nefrologia/normas , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/diagnóstico , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Biópsia , Consenso , Feminino , Geriatras/normas , Humanos , Masculino , Nefrologistas/normas , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente/normas , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Prognóstico , Encaminhamento e Consulta/normas , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/epidemiologia , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/terapia , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
In any particular region, determining an adequate, quantifiable geriatrician full-time equivalent required to run geriatric medicine services comprehensively - that is spanning both inpatient and outpatient settings - remains an imperfect science. Whilst workforce planning may be addressed through 'demand versus supply' simulations, 'specialist-to-patient ratios' (SPRs) may be a useful additional workforce metric. There has never been a yardstick SPR, which 'defines' a satisfactory level of geriatrician manpower in any particular Australian hospital catchment. Here, a new methodology is proposed (tailored specifically to Australian geriatrics), illustrating how we may begin to transparently deduce such a national benchmark SPR. Allowing for some empiricism, the method presently favours an SPR approximating '0.4 full-time equivalent of geriatrician time per 10 000 head of population' in regions with 'average' population age distribution; this level of manpower may afford specialist assessment of targeted patients (widely capturing geriatric cases from acute to community settings). Further discussion on workforce planning methodologies is warranted.
Assuntos
Geriatras/provisão & distribuição , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde/organização & administração , Serviços de Saúde para Idosos/organização & administração , Mão de Obra em Saúde/organização & administração , Avaliação das Necessidades/organização & administração , Regionalização da Saúde/organização & administração , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Austrália , Benchmarking/organização & administração , Feminino , Avaliação Geriátrica , Geriatras/normas , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde/normas , Serviços de Saúde para Idosos/normas , Mão de Obra em Saúde/normas , Humanos , Masculino , Avaliação das Necessidades/normas , Regionalização da Saúde/normas , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
Native Hawaiian and other Pacific Islanders (NHOPI) experience significant health disparities compared with other racial groups in the United States. Lower life expectancy has resulted in small proportions of elders in the population distribution of NHOPI, yet the number of NHOPI elders is growing. This article presents data on NHOPI elders and discusses possible reasons for continuing health disparities, including historical trauma, discrimination, changing lifestyle, and cultural values. We outline promising interventions with NHOPI and make suggestions for future research.