RESUMO
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Telemedicine quickly became integrated into healthcare caused by the Coronavirus 19 (COVID-19) pandemic. Rapid use of telemedicine into healthcare systems was supported by the World Health Organization and other prominent national organizations to reduce transmission of the virus while continuing to provide access to care. In this review, we explored the effect of this swift change in care and its impact on older adults with cancer. RECENT FINDINGS: Older adults are susceptible to the COVID-19 virus caused by various risk factors, such as comorbidity, frailty, decreased immunity, and cancer increases vulnerability to infection, hospitalization, and mortality. We found three major themes emerged in the literature published in the past 18 months, including access to care, telemedicine modes of communication, and the use of technology by older adults with cancer. These findings have brought insight into issues regarding healthcare disparities. SUMMARY: The utilization of telemedicine by older adults with cancer has potential future benefits with the integration of technology preparation prior to the patient's initial visit and addressing known health disparities. The hybrid model of care provides in-person and or remote access to clinicians which may allow older adults with cancer the flexibility needed to obtain quality cancer care.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Neoplasias , Telemedicina , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Telemedicina/organização & administração , Neoplasias/terapia , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Idoso , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/organização & administração , Oncologia/organização & administração , SARS-CoV-2 , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Geriatria/organização & administração , PandemiasRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Nursing homes have suffered in a particularly pronounced way from the effects of COVID-19 so it is very convenient to know the evolution in them of the disease and the impact of SARS-CoV2 vaccination The objective of this study was to analyze COVID-19 pandemic evolution from the start of the second wave to the end of the vaccination campaign at the nursing homes. A coordination program between Primary Care and Geriatrics and Public Health services was activated. METHODS: 2,668 seniors were followed at 39 nursing homes. Data from new cases, active cases, mortality and place of treatment of COVID-19 were collected. A descriptive analysis was performed with the measurement of the absolute number of positive SARS-CoV-2 cases and the frequency distribution. RESULTS: Between August 7th 2020 and February 26th 2021, 30 outbreaks occurred at 21 nursing homes. 300 people tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 (11% of total residents). The daily average of active cases was 27,166 were hospitalized (55%). 66 patients died (22% of those infected), 54 of them (78%) at the hospital. 1,984 PCR tests were performed. The temporary profile of new cases did not follow a distribution "in waves" as in the community. Thirty-seven days after the start of the second dose of vaccination, there were no active cases until March 1st, when new cases were under study for possible vaccine leakage. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of COVID-19 at nursing homes after the first wave of the pandemic has apparently been lower. The transmission in these centers has followed a different distribution than at community. Mass vaccination has achieved the practical disappearance of the disease.
OBJETIVO: Los centros residenciales han sufrido de una manera especialmente acusada los efectos de la COVID-19 por lo que es muy conveniente conocer la evolución en ellos de la enfermedad y el impacto de la vacunación frente al SARS-CoV2. El objetivo de este estudio fue conocer la evolución de la pandemia de COVID-19 desde el comienzo de la segunda ola hasta el final del proceso de vacunación en las residencias de personas mayores de un área sanitaria, en la cual se activó un programa de coordinación entre Atención Primaria y los servicios de Geriatría y Salud Publica. METODOS: Se siguió a 2.668 personas mayores en 39 residencias. Se recogieron datos de casos nuevos, activos, fallecidos y lugar de tratamiento de la COVID-19. Se realizó un análisis descriptivo con la medición del número absoluto de casos positivo de SARS-CoV-2 y la distribución de frecuencias. RESULTADOS: Entre el 7 de agosto de 2020 y el 26 de febrero de 2021 se produjeron 30 brotes en 21 residencias. Se detectaron 300 casos positivos de SARS-CoV-2 (11% de los residentes totales). La media diaria de casos activos fue 27. Fueron hospitalizados 166 (55%). Fallecieron 66 pacientes (22% de los infectados), 54 de ellos (78%) en el hospital. Se realizaron 1.984 test PCR. El perfil temporal de aparición de casos nuevos no siguió una distribución "en olas" como en la comunidad. Treinta y siete días después del inicio de la segunda dosis de vacunación, no existieron casos activos hasta el 1 de marzo en que aparecieron nuevos casos en estudio por posible escape vacunal. CONCLUSIONES: La incidencia de la COVID-19 en las residencias de personas mayores tras la primera ola de la pandemia es aparentemente inferior. La transmisión en estos centros sigue una distribución diferente a la de la comunidad. El efecto de la vacunación masiva consigue la práctica desaparición de la enfermedad.
Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Geriatria/organização & administração , Casas de Saúde/organização & administração , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Atenção Primária à Saúde/organização & administração , Saúde Pública/métodos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/transmissão , Seguimentos , Geriatria/métodos , Instituição de Longa Permanência para Idosos/organização & administração , Humanos , Incidência , Colaboração Intersetorial , Masculino , Atenção Primária à Saúde/métodos , Espanha/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: To characterize the experience of converting a geriatrics clinic to telehealth visits in early stages of a pandemic. DESIGN: An organizational case study with mixed methods evaluation from the first 8 weeks of converting a geriatrics clinic from in-person visits to video and telephone visits. SETTING: Veteran's Health Administration in Northern California Participants Community-dwelling older Veterans receiving care at VA Palo Alto Geriatrics clinic. Veterans had a mean age of 85.7 (SD = 6.8) and 72.1% had cognitive impairment. INTERVENTION: Veterans with face-to-face appointments were converted to video or telephone visits to mitigate exposure to community spread of COVID-19. MEASUREMENTS: Thirty-two patient evaluations and 80 clinician feedback evaluations were completed. This provided information on satisfaction, care access during pandemic, and travel and time savings. RESULTS: Of the 62 scheduled appointments, 43 virtual visits (69.4%) were conducted. Twenty-six (60.5%) visits were conducted via video, 17 (39.5%) by telephone. Virtual visits saved patients an average of 118.6 minutes each. Patients and providers had similar, positive perceptions about telehealth to in-person visit comparison, limiting exposure, and visit satisfaction. After the telehealth appointment, patients indicated greater comfort with using virtual visits in the future. Thirty-one evaluations included comments for qualitative analysis. We identified 3 main themes of technology set-up and usability, satisfaction with visit, and clinical assessment and communication. CONCLUSION: During a pandemic that has limited the ability to safely conduct inperson services, virtual formats offer a feasible and acceptable alternative for clinically-complex older patients. Despite potential barriers and additional effort required for telehealth visits, patients expressed willingness to utilize this format. Patients and providers reported high satisfaction, particularly with the ability to access care similar to in-person while staying safe. Investing in telehealth services during a pandemic ensures that vulnerable older patients can access care while maintaining social distancing, an important safety measure.
Assuntos
Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial/organização & administração , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Geriatria/organização & administração , Telemedicina/organização & administração , Serviços de Saúde para Veteranos Militares/organização & administração , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , COVID-19/epidemiologia , California/epidemiologia , Demência/terapia , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos de Casos Organizacionais , Atenção Primária à Saúde/organização & administração , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Telefone , Comunicação por VideoconferênciaRESUMO
Older people living in nursing homes fulfil the criteria to be considered as geriatric patients, but they often do not have met their health care needs. Current deficits appeared as a result of COVID-19 pandemic. The need to improve the coordination between hospitals and nursing homes emerged, and in Madrid it materialized with the implantation of Liaison Geriatrics teams or units at public hospitals. The Sociedad Española de Geriatría y Gerontología has defined the role of the geriatricians in the COVID-19 pandemic and they have given guidelines about prevention, early detection, isolation and sectorization, training, care homes classification, patient referral coordination, and the role of the different care settings, among others. These units and teams also must undertake other care activities that have a shortfall currently, like nursing homes-hospital coordination, geriatricians visits to the homes, telemedicine sessions, geriatric assessment in emergency rooms, and primary care and public health services coordination. This paper describes the concept of Liaison Geriatrics and its implementation at the Autonomous Community of Madrid hospitals as a result of COVID-19 pandemic. Activity data from a unit at a hospital with a huge number of nursing homes in its catchment area are reported. The objective is to understand the need of this activity in order to avoid the current fragmentation of care between hospitals and nursing homes. This activity should be consolidated in the future.
Assuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , Geriatria/organização & administração , Instituição de Longa Permanência para Idosos/organização & administração , Casas de Saúde/organização & administração , Pandemias , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/legislação & jurisprudência , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/organização & administração , Avaliação Geriátrica , Geriatras/organização & administração , Geriatras/provisão & distribuição , Administração de Serviços de Saúde , Instituição de Longa Permanência para Idosos/classificação , Hospitais Públicos/organização & administração , Humanos , Casas de Saúde/classificação , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Isolamento de Pacientes , Atenção Primária à Saúde/organização & administração , Administração em Saúde Pública , Encaminhamento e Consulta/organização & administração , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , Estudos Soroepidemiológicos , Espanha/epidemiologia , Telemedicina/organização & administraçãoRESUMO
The Covid- 19 pandemic has brought immense challenges to almost every country as it spreads throughout their populations. Foremost among these challenges is the heightened awareness of inequalities in society and the immense toll that the virus has on the most vulnerable. Globally, older people are the most at risk of getting the virus and dying from the it. Yet, although age is a significant contributor, it is its interaction with other factors, chronic conditions, poverty, and race that makes it a strong determinant. These factors reflect disparities and systemic social injustices that interact to increase the vulnerability of older adults. This paper discusses the many roles that social work, with its focus on social change, injustice, and vulnerable groups can intervene at many levels of practice and with specific groups to alleviate these fundamental disparities.
Assuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , Geriatria/organização & administração , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Serviço Social/organização & administração , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Etarismo/psicologia , Cuidadores/psicologia , Demência/epidemiologia , Tecnologia Digital/organização & administração , Serviços de Assistência Domiciliar/organização & administração , Instituição de Longa Permanência para Idosos/organização & administração , Humanos , Casas de Saúde/organização & administração , Pandemias , Pobreza , Racismo , SARS-CoV-2 , Isolamento Social , Justiça Social , Fatores SocioeconômicosRESUMO
China is in a stage of rapid aging of its population, and its old-age dependency ratio has been increasing for decades. The acceleration of aging of the population and the increasing old-age dependency ratio will significantly increase the pressure on social security and public services, highlight the need for the effective supply of labor, and weaken the demographic dividend, which will continue to affect social vitality, the power to innovate, and potential economic growth rates. Promoting social engagement has been widely recognized as an effective strategy to address these challenges. Such an approach not only promotes the development of social productivity, but it also alleviates the social burden. Actively promoting the social engagement of the elderly is an important task in gerontology in China. Although the development of social engagement of the elderly is on the rise, the infrastructure and institutions to provide social engagement need to be enhanced. Improving social engagement in China is not just the responsibility of older adults themselves but also of the country and society as a whole. In the future, the entire society will fully understand the special role of older adults and increase their value through social engagement to achieve active and healthy aging in China.
Assuntos
Geriatria/organização & administração , Política de Saúde/tendências , Promoção da Saúde/organização & administração , Envelhecimento Saudável/psicologia , Participação Social , Adaptação Psicológica , Idoso , China , Geriatria/métodos , Geriatria/tendências , Promoção da Saúde/métodos , Promoção da Saúde/tendências , Humanos , Dinâmica PopulacionalAssuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , Geriatria/organização & administração , Perda Auditiva/epidemiologia , Pessoas com Deficiência Auditiva , Serviço Social/organização & administração , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Doença Crônica , Comorbidade , Comunicação em Saúde/métodos , Comunicação em Saúde/normas , Letramento em Saúde , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/organização & administração , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Humanos , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Língua de Sinais , Isolamento SocialAssuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , Geriatria/organização & administração , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Serviço Social/organização & administração , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , COVID-19/psicologia , Comorbidade , Infecções por HIV/psicologia , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/organização & administração , Humanos , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Isolamento Social , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Populações Vulneráveis/psicologia , Populações Vulneráveis/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
The designation of "age friendly" has clearly engaged the attention of scholars and leading experts in the field of aging. A search of PubMed references citing the term produced 15 results in the 5-year period from 2006 to 2011; that number increased to 572 in the period from 2015 to 2019. The work, notably led by the World Health Organization with the initiation of age-friendly cities and age-friendly communities, has now sparked a movement for the creation of age-friendly health systems and age-friendly public health systems. Now more than ever, in an era of pandemics, it seems wise to create an ecosystem where each of the age-friendly initiatives can create synergies and additional momentum as the population continues to age. Work of a global nature is especially important given the array of international programs and scientific groups focused on improving the lives of older adults along with their care and support system and our interconnectedness as a world community. In this article, we review the historical evolution of age-friendly programs and describe a vision for an age-friendly ecosystem that can encompass the lived environment, social determinants of health, the healthcare system, and our prevention-focused public health system.
Assuntos
Envelhecimento , Ecossistema , Planejamento Ambiental , Geriatria/organização & administração , Promoção da Saúde , Assistência Centrada no Paciente/organização & administração , Características de Residência , Idoso , Cidades , Humanos , Qualidade de Vida , Meio Social , População UrbanaAssuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , Geriatria/organização & administração , Serviço Social/organização & administração , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Etarismo/psicologia , Tecnologia Digital/métodos , Meio Ambiente , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Humanos , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Meio Social , Isolamento SocialAssuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , Geriatria/organização & administração , Serviços de Assistência Domiciliar/organização & administração , Serviço Social/organização & administração , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Etarismo/psicologia , Serviços de Assistência Domiciliar/economia , Serviços de Assistência Domiciliar/normas , Humanos , Pandemias , República da Coreia/epidemiologia , SARS-CoV-2 , Isolamento SocialRESUMO
Scant attention has been paid to intersecting vulnerabilities experienced by Black, Latinx, and older adults of color (BLOAC) that increase COVID-19 related risks. Structural inequities have resulted in disproportionate rates of chronic conditions and limited access to care. Media coverage, focused on COVID-19 mortality among institutionalized older adults (OA), has overlooked community-dwelling OA, leaving their unique risks unaddressed in research and intervention efforts. Key vulnerabilities impacting noninstitutionalized BLOAC exacerbating adverse health outcomes during COVID-19 are discussed, and recommendations are given for gerontological social work (GSW) education, training, and practice to meet the needs of BLOAC during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Assuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , Geriatria/organização & administração , Grupos Minoritários/psicologia , Serviço Social/organização & administração , Adaptação Psicológica , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Etarismo/psicologia , COVID-19/psicologia , Geriatria/educação , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Humanos , Pandemias , Racismo/psicologia , SARS-CoV-2 , Isolamento Social , Serviço Social/educação , Fatores SocioeconômicosRESUMO
It has long been the goal of many gerontological social work scholars to increase the ability and opportunity for people to be engaged in paid and unpaid work throughout the life course. Yet the COVID-19 pandemic is revealing and exacerbating the financial insecurity of many older adults. In this paper, we review information related to older workers and how they might be affected by this pandemic and its aftermath, paying particular attention to the most socioeconomically and physically vulnerable older workers. We also offer first-hand experiences from our careers working with and conducting scholarship on older workers, paying particular attention to recent actions by many in the Senior Community Service Employment Program (SCSEP) network to provide paid sick leave to its low-income, older adult participants. We conclude with implications for social work scholarship and teaching, noting the uptick in technology use among older adults and the disparities that remain, as well as teaching that integrates discussions on the lifelong and cumulative effects of inequalities and marginalization and the need for additional researcher, student, and community collaborations.
Assuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , Emprego/organização & administração , Geriatria/organização & administração , Serviço Social/organização & administração , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Etarismo/psicologia , Emprego/economia , Emprego/psicologia , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Humanos , Pandemias , Pobreza , SARS-CoV-2 , Licença Médica/economia , Isolamento SocialRESUMO
During the COVID-19 pandemic, nursing homes and assisted living facilities have accounted for over 20% of all infections, adult day care and other congregate sites have closed, and traditional home care agencies are facing staff shortages. In this environment, self-direction of home and community-based services, where the participant can hire their own staff and manage a budget that can be used for a broad range of goods and services including home modifications and assistive devices, is seen as a promising intervention. Using self-direction participants can minimize the number of people who enter their homes and pay close family and friends who were already providing many hours of informal care, and now may be unemployed. The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services is encouraging this approach. This commentary presents information on how states have responded using the new CMS Toolkit by expanding who can be a paid caregiver, increasing budgets and broadening the kinds of items that can be purchased with budgets to include items like personal protective equipment and supports for telehealth. This Commentary concludes with policy and research questions regarding how the delivery of long-term services and supports (LTSS) may change as the world returns to"normal".
Assuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S./organização & administração , Geriatria/organização & administração , Serviços de Assistência Domiciliar/organização & administração , Serviço Social/organização & administração , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Etarismo/psicologia , Cuidadores/organização & administração , Serviços de Assistência Domiciliar/economia , Serviços de Assistência Domiciliar/normas , Humanos , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Isolamento Social , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
The novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is impacting health globally, whereas older adults are highly susceptible and more likely to have adverse health outcomes. In Bangladesh, the elderly population has been increasing over the past few decades, who often live with poor socioeconomic conditions and inadequate access to healthcare services. These disparities are likely to increase amid COVID-19, which may result in high mortality and morbidity among Bangladeshi older adults. We recommend that multifaceted interventions should be adopted for strengthening social care and health systems approach to ensure wellbeing, promote preventive measures, and facilitate access to healthcare among older adults in Bangladesh. Such multipronged measures would require policy-level commitment and collaborative efforts of health and social care providers and institutions to protect health and wellbeing among this vulnerable population during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Assuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , Geriatria/organização & administração , Serviços de Saúde para Idosos/organização & administração , Serviço Social/organização & administração , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Bangladesh/epidemiologia , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/organização & administração , Humanos , Doenças não Transmissíveis/epidemiologia , Pandemias , Serviços Preventivos de Saúde/organização & administração , SARS-CoV-2 , Isolamento Social , Telemedicina/organização & administraçãoAssuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , Geriatria/organização & administração , Serviço Social/organização & administração , Populações Vulneráveis , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Envelhecimento , Cuidadores/organização & administração , Pessoas com Deficiência , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Humanos , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Isolamento Social , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaAssuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , Geriatria/organização & administração , Rede Social , Previdência Social/organização & administração , Serviço Social/organização & administração , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Relações Familiares/etnologia , Gana/epidemiologia , Humanos , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Isolamento SocialRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The American College of Emergency Physicians' geriatric emergency department (GED) guidelines recommend additional staff and geriatric equipment, which may not be financially feasible for every ED. Data from an accredited Level 1 GED was used to report equipment costs and to develop a business model for financial sustainability of a GED. METHODS: Staff salaries including the cost of fringe benefits were obtained from a Midwestern hospital with an academic ED of 80,000 annual visits. Reimbursement assumptions included 100% Medicare/Medicaid insurance payor and 8-hour workdays with 4.5 weeks of leave annually. Equipment costs from hospital invoices were collated. Operational and patient safety metrics were compared before and after the GED. RESULTS: A geriatric nurse practitioner in the ED is financially self-sustaining at 7.1 consultations, a pharmacist is self-sustaining at 7.7 medication reconciliation consultations, and physical and occupational therapist evaluations are self-sustaining at 5.7 and 4.6 consults per workday, respectively. Total annual equipment costs for mobility aids, delirium aids, sensory aids, and personal care items for the GED was $4,513. Comparing the 2 years before and after, in regard to operational metrics the proportions of patients with lengths of stay > 8 hours and patients placed in observation did not change. In regard to patient safety, the rate of falls decreased from 0.60/1,000 patient visits to 0.42/1,000 in the ED observation unit and 0.42/1,000 to 0.36/1,000 in the ED. ED recidivism at 7 and 30 days did not change. Estimated cost savings from the reduction in falls was $80,328. CONCLUSION: The additional equipment and personnel costs for comprehensive geriatric assessment in the ED are potentially financially justified by revenue generation and improvements in patient safety measures. A geriatric ED was associated with a decrease in patient falls in the ED but did not decrease admissions or ED recidivism.
Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/economia , Avaliação Geriátrica/métodos , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Análise Custo-Benefício , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/organização & administração , Feminino , Geriatria/economia , Geriatria/organização & administração , Hospitalização/economia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare , Mecanismo de Reembolso/organização & administração , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados UnidosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Population ageing is a reality for which national health systems are not adapted. The World Health Organisation has already raised awareness about the implementation of specific measures, from undergraduate training to dedicated elderly care units, to tackle this situation. In this article, the aim is to analyse the potential benefits of geriatric monitoring on elderly neurosurgical patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A descriptive analysis was performed in this medical centre, comparing the information collected from elderly patients (over 75 years of age) admitted into the neurosurgical department during 2periods: June 2015 to February 2017, in which a shared geriatric monitoring was implemented, and between October 2013 and May 2015, equivalent period, in which only the geriatrician performed the evaluation of the patients' general condition, before referring them to other social-healthcare units. A number of factors were considered, including mean age, gender, the neurosurgical condition that led to admission, mean stay, infectious complications, acute confusional syndrome, admission into an intensive care unit, need for support from other medical departments, reoperations, mortality during hospitalisation, referral to social-health units, readmission within a month, and mortality within a year. RESULTS: A total of 173 patients on shared monitoring were compared to 189 patients from the previous period. Both groups had similar demographic characteristics. During the analysis, a significant reduction was observed in shared monitoring as regards, mean hospitalisation, infectious complications, admissions into an intensive care unit, the need for support from other medical departments, readmissions within a month, and mortality within a year. CONCLUSIONS: On patients of over 75 years of age, shared geriatric-neurosurgical monitoring reduces mean hospitalisation, morbidity, the need for support from other medical departments, early readmission, and mortality within a year. This strategy prioritises patient care, reduces costs, and rationalises resources.
Assuntos
Geriatria , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Tempo de Internação , Neurocirurgia , Readmissão do Paciente , Idoso , Geriatria/organização & administração , Hospitalização , Humanos , Morbidade , Neurocirurgia/organização & administraçãoRESUMO
Las personas mayores con fractura de cadera tienen un aumento del riesgo de mortalidad de 5 a 8 veces por todas las causas, y un riesgo mucho mayor de institucionalización por pérdida funcional, ya que solo el 50% de los pacientes que sobreviven, recuperan la actividad de la vida diaria previa a la fractura. Las intervenciones para prevenir dichos resultados, incluyendo una segunda fractura, se transforma en el objetivo principal en estos pacientes. El modelo de atención de ortogeriatría es un enfoque de atención multidimensional para los pacientes que sufren una fractura de cadera, que por lo general, es secundario a una caída desde su propia altura, conocida como fractura por fragilidad. Este modelo de atención desarrollado por geriatras y traumatólogos con la asistencia de un equipo multidisciplinario, incluye una evaluación integral perioperatoria y un equipo de enfermería centrada en la función premórbida del paciente, la cognición, las comorbilidades, que permite crear un plan individualizado, para ser monitorizado y asegurar su cumplimiento, los primeros dos años después de la fractura. Este esquema de trabajo ha demostrado mejorar el retorno a la función previa y la disminución de la mortalidad, con un costo reducido o un aumento de utilidad expresada en calidad de vida, por lo que es la atención más rentable para los pacientes que sufren una fractura de cadera.
Older people with hip fracture have an increased risk of mortality 5 to 8 times, for all causes and a much higher risk of institutionalization due to functional loss, because only 50% of patients who survive, recover the activity of daily life before the fracture. Interventions to prevent such results, including a second fracture, become the principal objective in these patients. The orthogeriatric care model, is a multidimensional approach for patients who suffer a hip fracture, which is usually secondary to a fall from their own height, known as a fragility fracture. This model of care developed by geriatricians and traumatologists with help of a multidisciplinary team, includes a comprehensive perioperative assessment and a nursing team focused on the premorbid patient state, cognition, comorbidities, which allows creating an individualized plan, to be monitored and ensure compliance, the first 2 years. This work scheme has been shown to improve the return of the function and the reduction of mortality at a reduced cost or an expressed utility in quality of life, making it the most cost-effective care for patients suffering from a hip fracture.