Incretin-based therapies in the management of type 2 diabetes: rationale and reality in a managed care setting.

In addition to the hypoglycemia and weight gain associated with many treatments for type 2 diabetes, alpha-glucosidase inhibitors, thiazolidinediones, metformin, sulfonylureas, and the glinides do not address all of the multiple defects existing in the pathophysiology of the disease. Cumulatively, these oral agents address the influx of glucose from the gastrointestinal tract, impaired insulin activity, and acute beta-cell dysfunction in type 2 diabetes; however, until recently, there were no means to deal with the inappropriate hyperglucagonemia or chronic beta-cell-decline characteristic of the disease. The recently introduced incretin-based therapies serve to address some of the challenges associated with traditionally available oral antidiabetic agents. In addition to improving beta-cell function, stimulating insulin secretion, and inhibiting glucagon secretion, these agents reduce appetite, thereby stabilizing weight and/or promoting weight loss in patients with type 2 diabetes. Of the incretin-based therapies, both the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors and the glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists stimulate insulin secretion and inhibit glucagon secretion. The subsequent review outlines evidence from selected clinical trials of the currently available GLP-1 receptor agonists, exenatide and liraglutide, and DPP-4 inhibitors, sitagliptin and saxagliptin. Earlier and more frequent use of these incretin-based therapies is recommended in the treatment of type 2 diabetes, based on their overall safety and ability to achieve the glycosylated hemoglobin level goal. As such, both the American Diabetes Association and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology (AACE/ACE) treatment algorithms recommend the use of incretin-based therapy in both treatment-naive and previously treated patients. The AACE/ACE guidelines clearly state that these agents should not be limited to third- or fourth-line therapy.

An assessment of the in vivo efficacy of the glycogen phosphorylase inhibitor GPi688 in rat models of hyperglycaemia.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Studies in cultured hepatocytes demonstrate glycogen synthase (GS) activation with glycogen phosphorylase (GP) inhibitors. The current study investigated whether these phenomena occurred in vivo using a novel GP inhibitor. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: An allosteric GP inhibitor, GPi688, was evaluated against both glucagon-mediated hyperglycaemia and oral glucose challenge-mediated hyperglycaemia to determine the relative effects against GP and GS in vivo. KEY RESULTS: In rat primary hepatocytes, GPi688 inhibited glucagons-mediated glucose output in a concentration dependent manner. Additionally GP activity was reduced and GS activity increased seven-fold. GPi688 inhibited glucagon-mediated hyperglycaemia in both Wistar (65%) & obese Zucker (100%) rats and demonstrated a long duration of action in the Zucker rat. The in vivo efficacy in the glucagon challenge model could be predicted by the equation; % glucagon inhibition=56.9+34.3[log ([free plasma]/rat IC50)], r=0.921). GPi688 also reduced the blood glucose of obese Zucker rats after a 7 h fast by 23%. In an oral glucose tolerance test in Zucker rats, however, GPi688 was less efficacious (7% reduction) than a glycogen synthase kinase-3 (GSK-3) inhibitor (22% reduction), despite also observing activation (by 45%) of GS in vivo. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Although GP inhibition can inhibit hyperglycaemia mediated by increased glucose production, the degree of GS activation induced by allosteric GP inhibitors in vivo, although discernible, is insufficient to increase glucose disposal. The data suggests that GP inhibitors might be more effective clinically against fasting rather than prandial hyperglycaemic control.