Epidemiology and surgical management of 184 obturator hernias: a nationwide registry-based cohort study.

PURPOSE: We aimed describe the patient characteristics, surgical details, postoperative outcomes, and prevalence and incidence of obturator hernias. Obturator hernias are rare with high mortality and no consensus on the best surgical approach. Given their rarity, substantial data is lacking, especially related to postoperative outcomes. METHODS: The study was based on data from the nationwide Danish Hernia Database. All adults who underwent obturator hernia surgery in Denmark during 1998-2023 were included. The primary outcomes were demographic characteristics, surgical details, postoperative outcomes, and the prevalence and incidence of obturator hernias. RESULTS: We included 184 obturator hernias in 167 patients (88% females) with a median age of 77 years. Emergency surgeries constituted 42% of repairs, and 72% were laparoscopic. Mesh was used in 77% of the repairs, with sutures exclusively used in emergency repairs. Concurrent groin hernias were found in 57% of cases. Emergency surgeries had a 30-day mortality of 14%, readmission rate of 21%, and median length of stay of 6 days. Elective surgeries had a 30-day mortality of 0%, readmission rate of 10%, and median length of stay of 0 days. The prevalence of obturator hernias in hernia surgery was 0.084% (95% CI: 0.071%-0.098%), with an incidence of one per 400,000 inhabitants annually. CONCLUSIONS: This was the largest cohort study to date on obturator hernias. They were rare, affected primarily elderly women. The method of repair depends on whether the presentation is acute, and emergency repair is associated with higher mortality.

Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal technique versus open surgery with the ULTRAPRO Hernia System for the repair of female primary femoral hernias-an observational retrospective study.

Femoral hernias (FHs), predominantly seen in females, require surgery for cure. To date, surgical repair of primary FHs in female patients with either open surgery or laparoscopic operation has been poorly documented. We retrospectively investigated the treatment of female primary FHs with open surgery using the ULTRAPRO Hernia System (UHS procedure) or the laparoscopic procedure, namely, the transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) technique. A total of 41 female patients with primary FHs who had undergone UHS or TAPP were included in this study. The procedural parameters, post-surgical complications, treatment expense, and follow-up results were analyzed. The vast majority of patients (39/41) underwent elective operations: 15 received UHS (including 2 emergency cases) and 26 had TAPP (P = .08). The UHS group had a greater average age, due to the fact that FHs occur often in people with advanced age who tend to have systemic disease, limiting the use of general anesthesia required for TAPP. Compared with UHS, TAPP took a significantly shorter time to complete and patients undergoing TAPP had a dramatically shorter hospital stay. While no recurrence was observed in both groups, post-procedure pain and foreign body sensation were reported by significantly more patients in UHS group. The cost was greater with TAPP. Taken together, we concluded that both UHS and TAPP are effective in the management of female FHs. In view of the advantages and disadvantages between the open and the laparoscopic operation, surgeons can select a procedure according to their skills and patients' situation.

International guidelines for groin hernia management.

INTRODUCTION: Worldwide, more than 20 million patients undergo groin hernia repair annually. The many different approaches, treatment indications and a significant array of techniques for groin hernia repair warrant guidelines to standardize care, minimize complications, and improve results. The main goal of these guidelines is to improve patient outcomes, specifically to decrease recurrence rates and reduce chronic pain, the most frequent problems following groin hernia repair. They have been endorsed by all five continental hernia societies, the International Endo Hernia Society and the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery. METHODS: An expert group of international surgeons (the HerniaSurge Group) and one anesthesiologist pain expert was formed. The group consisted of members from all continents with specific experience in hernia-related research. Care was taken to include surgeons who perform different types of repair and had preferably performed research on groin hernia surgery. During the Group's first meeting, evidence-based medicine (EBM) training occurred and 166 key questions (KQ) were formulated. EBM rules were followed in complete literature searches (including a complete search by The Dutch Cochrane database) to January 1, 2015 and to July 1, 2015 for level 1 publications. The articles were scored by teams of two or three according to Oxford, SIGN and Grade methodologies. During five 2-day meetings, results were discussed with the working group members leading to 136 statements and 88 recommendations. Recommendations were graded as "strong" (recommendations) or "weak" (suggestions) and by consensus in some cases upgraded. In the Results and summary section below, the term "should" refers to a recommendation. The AGREE II instrument was used to validate the guidelines. An external review was performed by three international experts. They recommended the guidelines with high scores. The risk factors for inguinal hernia (IH) include: family history, previous contra-lateral hernia, male gender, age, abnormal collagen metabolism, prostatectomy, and low body mass index. Peri-operative risk factors for recurrence include poor surgical techniques, low surgical volumes, surgical inexperience and local anesthesia. These should be considered when treating IH patients. IH diagnosis can be confirmed by physical examination alone in the vast majority of patients with appropriate signs and symptoms. Rarely, ultrasound is necessary. Less commonly still, a dynamic MRI or CT scan or herniography may be needed. The EHS classification system is suggested to stratify IH patients for tailored treatment, research and audit. Symptomatic groin hernias should be treated surgically. Asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic male IH patients may be managed with "watchful waiting" since their risk of hernia-related emergencies is low. The majority of these individuals will eventually require surgery; therefore, surgical risks and the watchful waiting strategy should be discussed with patients. Surgical treatment should be tailored to the surgeon's expertise, patient- and hernia-related characteristics and local/national resources. Furthermore, patient health-related, life style and social factors should all influence the shared decision-making process leading up to hernia management. Mesh repair is recommended as first choice, either by an open procedure or a laparo-endoscopic repair technique. One standard repair technique for all groin hernias does not exist. It is recommended that surgeons/surgical services provide both anterior and posterior approach options. Lichtenstein and laparo-endoscopic repair are best evaluated. Many other techniques need further evaluation. Provided that resources and expertise are available, laparo-endoscopic techniques have faster recovery times, lower chronic pain risk and are cost effective. There is discussion concerning laparo-endoscopic management of potential bilateral hernias (occult hernia issue). After patient consent, during TAPP, the contra-lateral side should be inspected. This is not suggested during unilateral TEP repair. After appropriate discussions with patients concerning results tissue repair (first choice is the Shouldice technique) can be offered. Day surgery is recommended for the majority of groin hernia repair provided aftercare is organized. Surgeons should be aware of the intrinsic characteristics of the meshes they use. Use of so-called low-weight mesh may have slight short-term benefits like reduced postoperative pain and shorter convalescence, but are not associated with better longer-term outcomes like recurrence and chronic pain. Mesh selection on weight alone is not recommended. The incidence of erosion seems higher with plug versus flat mesh. It is suggested not to use plug repair techniques. The use of other implants to replace the standard flat mesh in the Lichtenstein technique is currently not recommended. In almost all cases, mesh fixation in TEP is unnecessary. In both TEP and TAPP it is recommended to fix mesh in M3 hernias (large medial) to reduce recurrence risk. Antibiotic prophylaxis in average-risk patients in low-risk environments is not recommended in open surgery. In laparo-endoscopic repair it is never recommended. Local anesthesia in open repair has many advantages, and its use is recommended provided the surgeon is experienced in this technique. General anesthesia is suggested over regional in patients aged 65 and older as it might be associated with fewer complications like myocardial infarction, pneumonia and thromboembolism. Perioperative field blocks and/or subfascial/subcutaneous infiltrations are recommended in all cases of open repair. Patients are recommended to resume normal activities without restrictions as soon as they feel comfortable. Provided expertise is available, it is suggested that women with groin hernias undergo laparo-endoscopic repair in order to decrease the risk of chronic pain and avoid missing a femoral hernia. Watchful waiting is suggested in pregnant women as groin swelling most often consists of self-limited round ligament varicosities. Timely mesh repair by a laparo-endoscopic approach is suggested for femoral hernias provided expertise is available. All complications of groin hernia management are discussed in an extensive chapter on the topic. Overall, the incidence of clinically significant chronic pain is in the 10-12% range, decreasing over time. Debilitating chronic pain affecting normal daily activities or work ranges from 0.5 to 6%. Chronic postoperative inguinal pain (CPIP) is defined as bothersome moderate pain impacting daily activities lasting at least 3 months postoperatively and decreasing over time. CPIP risk factors include: young age, female gender, high preoperative pain, early high postoperative pain, recurrent hernia and open repair. For CPIP the focus should be on nerve recognition in open surgery and, in selected cases, prophylactic pragmatic nerve resection (planned resection is not suggested). It is suggested that CPIP management be performed by multi-disciplinary teams. It is also suggested that CPIP be managed by a combination of pharmacological and interventional measures and, if this is unsuccessful, followed by, in selected cases (triple) neurectomy and (in selected cases) mesh removal. For recurrent hernia after anterior repair, posterior repair is recommended. If recurrence occurs after a posterior repair, an anterior repair is recommended. After a failed anterior and posterior approach, management by a specialist hernia surgeon is recommended. Risk factors for hernia incarceration/strangulation include: female gender, femoral hernia and a history of hospitalization related to groin hernia. It is suggested that treatment of emergencies be tailored according to patient- and hernia-related factors, local expertise and resources. Learning curves vary between different techniques. Probably about 100 supervised laparo-endoscopic repairs are needed to achieve the same results as open mesh surgery like Lichtenstein. It is suggested that case load per surgeon is more important than center volume. It is recommended that minimum requirements be developed to certify individuals as expert hernia surgeon. The same is true for the designation "Hernia Center". From a cost-effectiveness perspective, day-case laparoscopic IH repair with minimal use of disposables is recommended. The development and implementation of national groin hernia registries in every country (or region, in the case of small country populations) is suggested. They should include patient follow-up data and account for local healthcare structures. A dissemination and implementation plan of the guidelines will be developed by global (HerniaSurge), regional (international societies) and local (national chapters) initiatives through internet websites, social media and smartphone apps. An overarching plan to improve access to safe IH surgery in low-resource settings (LRSs) is needed. It is suggested that this plan contains simple guidelines and a sustainability strategy, independent of international aid. It is suggested that in LRSs the focus be on performing high-volume Lichtenstein repair under local anesthesia using low-cost mesh. Three chapters discuss future research, guidelines for general practitioners and guidelines for patients. CONCLUSIONS: The HerniaSurge Group has developed these extensive and inclusive guidelines for the management of adult groin hernia patients. It is hoped that they will lead to better outcomes for groin hernia patients wherever they live. More knowledge, better training, national audit and specialization in groin hernia management will standardize care for these patients, lead to more effective and efficient healthcare and provide direction for future research.

Risk factors for injuries associated with damage claims following groin hernia repair.

PURPOSE: Surgical repair of groin hernia should be carried out with minimal complication rates, and it is important to have regular quality control and accurate means of assessment. The Swedish healthcare system has a mutual insurance company (LÖF) that receives claims from patients who have suffered healthcare-related damage or malpractice. The Swedish Hernia Register (SHR) currently covers around 98% of all Swedish groin hernia operations. The aim of this study was to analyse damage claims following groin hernia repair surgery and link these with entries in the SHR, in order to identify risk factors and causes of injuries and malpractice associated with hernia repair. METHODS: Data on all 48,574 groin hernia operations registered in the SHR between 2008 and 2010 were compared and linked with data on claims made to the Swedish National Patient Injury Insurance (LÖF). RESULTS: Of the 130 damage claims received by LÖF, 26 dealt with bleeding, 20 with testicular injury and 7 with intestinal lesions. Eighty (62%) of the complications were considered malpractice according to the Swedish Patient Injury Act. Acute and recurrent surgery, sutured repair and general anaesthesia were associated with a significantly increased risk for a damage claim independently the patients were compensated or not. Females filed claims in greater proportion than males. There was no significant difference in background factors between claims accepted by LÖF and compensated and those who were rejected compensation. CONCLUSION: Risk factors for filing a damage claim included acute surgery, operation for recurrence, sutured repair and general anaesthesia, whereas local anaesthesia reduced the risk.

Patient-reported adverse events after hernia surgery and socio-economic status: A register-based cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to assess how socio-economic background influences perception of an adverse postoperative event after hernia surgery, and to see if this affects the pattern of seeking healthcare advice during the early postoperative period. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients aged 15 years or older with a primary unilateral inguinal or femoral hernia repair recorded in the Swedish Hernia Register (SHR) between November 1 and December 31, 2002 were sent a questionnaire inquiring about adverse events. Data on civil status, income, level of education and ethnic background were obtained from Statistics Sweden. RESULTS: Of the 1643 patients contacted, 1440 (87.6%) responded: 1333 (92.6%) were men and 107 (7.4%) women, mean age was 59 years. There were 203 (12.4%) non-responders. Adverse events were reported in the questionnaire by 390 (27.1%) patients. Patients born in Sweden and patients with high income levels reported a significantly higher incidence of perceived adverse events (p < 0.05). Patients born in Sweden and females reported more events requiring healthcare contact. There was no association between registered and self-reported outcome and civil status or level of education. CONCLUSION: We detected inequalities related to income level, gender and ethnic background. Even if healthcare utilization is influenced by socio-economic background, careful information of what may be expected in the postoperative period and how adverse events should be managed could lead to reduced disparity and improved quality of care in the community at large.

Is surgical repair of an asymptomatic groin hernia appropriate? A review.

PURPOSE: Groin herniorrhaphy is the most common operation performed by general surgeons. Annually, more than 20 million groin hernias are repaired worldwide. The general approach towards groin hernias is surgical repair regardless of the presence of symptoms. The rationale to recommend surgery for asymptomatic groin hernias is prevention of visceral strangulation. The goal of this review is to evaluate the appropriateness of surgery in patients with asymptomatic groin hernias. METHODS: The review was based on an extensive literature search of Pubmed, Medline and the Cochrane Library. RESULTS: The risk of incarceration is approximately 4 per 1,000 patients with a groin hernia per year. Risk factors for incarceration are age above 60 years, femoral hernia site and duration of signs less than 3 months. Morbidity and mortality rates of emergency groin hernia repair are higher in patients who are older than 49 years, have a delay between onset of symptoms and surgery of more than 12 h, have a femoral hernia, have nonviable bowel and have an ASA-class of 3 or 4. The recurrence rate after tension-free mesh repair in the management of emergency groin hernias is comparable to that of elective repair. There is no difference in pain and quality of life after elective repair compared to watchful waiting. There is no advantage in cost-effectiveness of elective repair compared to watchful waiting. CONCLUSION: Watchful waiting for asymptomatic groin hernias is a safe and cost-effective modality in patients who are under 50 years old, have an ASA class of 1 or 2, an inguinal hernia, and a duration of signs of more than 3 months.

[Experiences from more than 2,100 hernia repair operations. How has the therapy changed in the last 15 years?]. / Erfahrungen aus über 2100 Hernienreparationen. Wie hat sich die Therapie in den letzten 15 Jahren verändert?

INTRODUCTION: Inguinal hernia (IH) surgery has changed fundamentally during the last 25 years due to tension-free repair, minimally-invasive approaches and growing influence of economy in medical decision making. Aim of the study was the documentation and analysis of changes in IH surgery during the last 15 years in our patient cohort. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients undergoing elective or emergency inguinal/femoral hernia repair from January 1995 to December 2009 were included in the study. Analysis of patient data was carried out by prospective online recording. RESULTS: A total of 1,908 patients with 2,124 IHs were treated in the study period and the number of IH repairs decreased continuously. The number of recurrent hernias peaked in 2005-2009 with 16.4%. The average preoperative hospital stay decreased from 2.4 to 0.4 days and the postoperative hospital stay from 7.0 to 3.3 days. The percentage of suture repairs declined from 54.9% in 1995 to 4.1% in 2009 and the percentage of open tension-free repairs rose to 52.9% in 1998. In the following years the majority of repairs were performed by minimally invasive procedures but in 2009 the percentage of conventional hernia repairs exceeded the rate of minimally invasive repairs. CONCLUSION: The main reason for these changes is the implementation of diagnosis-related groups which hampers inpatient repair of "simple" inguinal hernias, favors short hospital stay and does not adequately reimburse minimally invasive repairs.

[Repairs of inguinofemoral and ventral hernias--review]. / A lágyéktáji és hasfali sérvek laparoscopos mutétei - áttekintés.

In this article the author reviews the results, technology and latest achievements in the history of laparoscopic hernia repair. In conclusion, having considered the advantages and disadvantages, laparoscopic hernia repair offers the best results in terms of early rehabilitation, early and long-term postoperative pain and a very low recurrence rate (less than 1% and 5%). In the hands of experienced laparoscopic surgeons, it remains the gold standard for hernia repairs indisputably.

[Prosthetic mesh for hernia repair: which mesh for which indication? Analysis of the Committee for the Assessment of Devices and Health Technologies of the French National Authority for Health (HAS). Assessment of prosthetic meshes for hernia repair]. / Implants de réfection de paroi : lequel, dans quelle indication ? Analyse de la Commission d'évaluation des produits et prestations de la Haute Autorité de santé (HAS). Evaluation des implants de réfection de paroi.

UNLABELLED: The Committee for the Assessment of Devices and Health Technologies (CEPP), one of the specialist committees of the French National Authority for Health (HAS), reassessed the use of prosthetic mesh for hernia repair in 2008. Mesh use is reimbursed by French national health insurance for use in adult and pediatric surgery. This reassessment had two primary purposes: (a) to define the indications and clinical situations justifying the use of mesh, and to describe the technical requirements; (b) to define the conditions of prescriptions and of use and to contribute to decisions for the renewal of inscription. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of published data and manufacturers' licenses and applied the judgment of a multidisciplinary working group of involved healthcare professionals. The CEPP first analyzed the different sorts of prosthetic mesh according to operative indications; they then compared the performance of each prosthesis based on comparative data from the literature or based on expert opinion when there was no available comparative data. The committee recommended three types of prosthesis: flat patch mesh, three-dimensional mesh (plug), and double-sided patch. Additional studies were recommended to confirm the benefits of selected products. The cost of meshes has been integrated into the reimbursement of each Diagnostic Related Group (DRG) and is no longer included in the List of Reimbursable Products and Services (Liste des produits et prestations remboursables [LPPR]); the High Authority for Health (HAS) recommends the selection of those prostheses evaluated by the CEPP in order to optimize the quality and cost of health care.

Inguinal hernia repair.

In excess of 100,000 inguinal hernia repairs are performed in the UK each year (Devlin & Kingsnorth 1998). It is the most commonly performed general surgical procedure and is routinely undertaken in patients receiving local anaesthesia in the day case setting. The Royal College of Surgeons has recommended that > 50% inguinal hernias are undertaken on day cases, although at present this figure is only 30% (RCSE 1993). This article defines hernias and describes the aetiology and surgical treatment of inguinal and femoral hernia. The differences between the traditional and laparoscopic repair of hernias are explored as well as the use of materials such as polypropylene mesh to enhance the repair. The need for thromboprophylaxis and antibiotic therapy are outlined together with patient discharge advice.

Association of hospital ownership with patient transfers to outpatient care under a prospective payment system in Taiwan.

Case payment, a prospective payment system akin to diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) has in-built incentives for hospitals to transfer inpatients to their own ambulatory care units following early discharge. This study used nation-wide inpatient claims data on a total of 100,730 patients treated in 2000 in (Taiwan): cesarean section (59,364 cases), femoral/inguinal hernia operation (18,675 cases), and hemorrhoidectomy (22,691 cases), all reimbursed by case payment, to explore the relationship between hospital ownership and patient transfers to outpatient treatment. For all three diagnoses, for-profit (FP) hospitals not only had lower lengths of stay (LOS) compared to public hospitals, but also showed very high odds of patient transfer to their own outpatient units, after controlling for institutional variables, (hospital level, teaching status, and geographic location), hospital competitive environment (the Herfindal-Hirschman index), and patient variables (gender, age, length of stay, and number of secondary diagnoses, a proxy for severity of illness). Similar, though slightly lower odds were observed with not-for-profit (NFP) hospitals relative to public hospitals. The findings support the property rights theory, suggesting that in Taiwan, institutional profit maximization motives may be driving patient transfers under the case payment diagnoses, rather than medical care needs. In NFP hospitals, their physician compensation mechanism, driven largely by care volumes provided by each physician, appears to be driving the disproportionately greater likelihood of patient transfer to outpatient care.

Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernia repair. A 7-year two-center experience in 3017patients.

BACKGROUND: This report reviews our experience with 3530 transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernia repairs in 3017 patients (513 bilateral) over the 7-year period from May 1992 to July 1999. We have continually audited our practice and modified the techniques in response. METHODS: Unless contraindicated, laparoscopic TAPP repair is considered the procedure of choice at our institution for all reducible inguinal hernias. We initially stapled an 11 x 6 cm polypropylene mesh in the preperitoneal space but now place a 15 x 10 cm mesh in the preperitoneal space with sutured peritoneal closure. RESULTS: There have been a total of 22 recurrences, of which 17 were identified in the first 325 repairs (5%) using the 11 x 6 cm mesh. Five recurrences occurred in the later 3205 repairs (0.16%) (median follow up of 45 months). There was one 30-day death unrelated to the procedure. There have been seven conversions (four due to irreducibility, two due to extensive adhesions, one due to bleeding). Bladder perforations have occurred in seven cases, of which six were recognized immediately and treated laparoscopically without sequelae. There have been seven cases of small bowel obstruction from herniation through the peritoneal closure. Sutured repair of the peritoneum has reduced the incidence of this complication. Four patients had mesh infections, of whom three were treated conservatively. The incidence of postoperative seroma and hematoma was 8%. Median operation time remains at 40 min with a mean hospitalization of 0.9 nights. Sixty percent of TAPP hernia repairs are now performed on the Day Surgical Unit with a 3% admission rate. Median return to normal activities is 7 days. Forty percent of patients require no postoperative analgesia. These figures remain the same whether the hernia is primary, recurrent, unilateral, or bilateral. Consultants performed most operations early in the series, but latterly surgical trainees have performed the majority of these procedures under supervision. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic TAPP hernia repair is technically difficult, but in the hands of a well-trained surgeon, it is safe and effective with a high degree of patient satisfaction. The low recurrence rate compares favorably to other tension-free mesh hernia repairs.

Quality assessment of 26,304 herniorrhaphies in Denmark: a prospective nationwide study.

BACKGROUND: Groin hernia repair is one of the most frequent operations, but there is no consensus about surgical or anaesthetic technique. Furthermore, no nationwide studies have been done. Our aim was to investigate outcome results of groin hernia surgery to improve quality of treatment. METHODS: We prospectively recorded 26304 groin hernia repairs done in Denmark from Jan 1, 1998, to June 30, 2000, in a nationwide Danish hernia database. FINDINGS: 93% of all groin herniorrhaphies done in Denmark in the 30 months of the study were recorded in the database. Kaplan-Meier estimates of reoperation rates 30 months after anterior mesh repair and laparoscopic repair were significantly lower than after sutured posterior wall repairs in primary inguinal hernia (2.2% and 2.6% vs 4.4%; p<0.0001). Reoperation rates were also lower with anterior mesh repair (6.1%; p<0.0001) and laparoscopic repair (3.4%; p<0.0001) than with sutured posterior wall repair (10.6%) after recurrent hernia. Use of Lichtenstein mesh repair increased from 33% in January, 1998, to 62% in June, 2000, whereas use of laparoscopic repair remained constant at about 5%. Kaplan-Meier estimates of reoperation rates were 2.8% in the first 15 months and 1.6% in the second (p=0.03). For elective repairs, only 59% of patients were treated on an outpatient basis, and only 18% had local anaesthesia. INTERPRETATION: Mesh repairs have a lower reoperation rate than conventional open repairs. Systematic prospective recording of treatment and outcome variables in a national clinical database improved the overall quality of surgical care. However, there is a large potential for cost savings and more efficient patient care with extended use of mesh techniques, outpatient surgery, and local anaesthesia.

Feasibility of local infiltration anaesthesia for recurrent groin hernia repair.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the the feasibility of and patients' satisfaction with day case repair of recurrent inguinal hernias under unmonitored local anaesthesia. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Public service university hospital, Denmark. SUBJECTS: All patients with a reducible recurrent inguinal or femoral hernia unselectedly referred for elective repair during the 4-year period 1 September 1994 to 31 August 1998. INTERVENTIONS: Data were collected prospectively and consecutively from standardised, detailed files, a questionnaire 4 weeks postoperatively, and the Copenhagen Hospitals electronic patient data management system. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Feasibility of local anaesthesia in the day case setting, patient satisfaction and morbidity. RESULTS: 215 consecutive operations for recurrent hernias were performed under unmonitored local anaesthesia. No conversion to general anaesthesia took place and no patients developed urinary retention. After 207 operations, the patients were discharged on the day of operation (96%), and the median time from the end of operation to discharge was 90 minutes (IQR 75-140). After 6 operations (3%), patients had complications that required surgical intervention. The 4-week questionnaire was returned after 208 operations (97%). 30 patients were dissatisfied, mainly because of intraoperative pain (17 patients, 8%). No mortality or cardiopulmonary morbidity was recorded during the first 30 days postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Open day-case repair of recurrent inguinal hernias can safely be conducted under unmonitored local anaesthesia with minimal morbidity. Intraoperative pain is the main topic that requires improvement.

Groin hernias in patients 50 years of age and above pattern and outcome of management in 250 consecutive patients.

A prospective survey of 250 elderly patients was carried out over a period of 5 years (1992-1996) to determine the pattern, outcome and prognostic factors of inguinal hernia repair in this groups of patients. The result showed that the mean age to be 61.5 years with male patients of 90%. Hernia was commonest on the right side in 49.6%, and bilateral in 15.2%. They were inguinal hernia and inguinoscrotal hernia in 63.2% and 31.2% and 31.2% respectively and femoral hernia in 5.6%. In 51.2% of the patients there were associated diseases. In 24.8% lower obstructive uropathy was diagnosed, of 5.6% presented in acute urinary retention and 3 cases of carcinoma of the prostate. Cardiopulmonary diseases in 19.6%. The hernia was incarcerated in 22.4%. More than half (55%) were operated under local or regional anaesthesia. In 22.4%, additional operative procedures were carried out, of which 62.6% of such patients had prostatectomy. They mean hospital stay was 4 days, 60% were operated as day surgery. Postoperative complications of scrotal haematoma/oedema in 16.4%, wound infections of 14.4%, postoperative hernia recurrence of 2.8% and death occurred in 1.6% of the patients. The outcome were significantly affected by the age, associated diseases, hernia complications such as incarceration or strangulation and the need for additional surgical procedures.

[Experience with the laparoscopic repair of inguinofemoral hernias]. / Inguinofemoralis sérvek laparoszkópos megoldásával szerzett tapasztalataink.

The authors have performed 110 inguinofemoral hernioplasties on 100 patients by transabdominal endoscopic method. There has been only one serious complication: a 50 years old man was reoperated on against a trocar-site bleeding and a postoperative adhesion-ileus. All patients recovered. The authors have got good experiences: postoperative pains are minimal, hospitality is short, ability to work comes back soon. Technics of the operation and cost-analysis are discussed here.

Emergency laparoscopy: a community hospital experience.

BACKGROUND: By now, laparoscopic surgery has achieved widespread acceptance among surgeons and, generally speaking, by the public. Therefore, we set out to evaluate whether this technique is a feasible method of treating patients with abdominal emergencies, traumatic or not. To assess the routine use of emergency laparoscopy in a community hospital setting, we undertook a retrospective analysis of an unrandomized experience (presence or absence of a surgeon with laparoscopic experience). METHODS: Between January 1993 and October 1998, 575 emergency abdominal surgical procedures were done in our department. In all, 365 (63.4%) were diagnostic and operative laparoscopy procedures (acute small bowel obstruction: 23 cases; hernia disease: one case; gastroduodenal ulcer disease: 15 cases; biliary system disease: 89 cases; pelvic disease: 237 cases). These cases represent almost 56% of all laparoscopic procedures done during the same period at our institution. Laparoscopy was not performed in patients with a history of a previous abdominal approach to malignant disease, a history of more than two major abdominal surgeries, or massive bowel distension; nor was it used in patients whose general conditions contraindicate this approach. RESULTS: The conversion rate was 6.8%. The morbidity and mortality rates were, respectively, 4.1% and 0.8%. A definitive diagnosis was provided in 95.3% of cases, with the possibility to treat 88.2% of them by laparoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: We consider the laparoscopic approach in patients with abdominal emergencies to be feasible and safe in experienced hands. It provides diagnostic accuracy as well as therapeutic capabilities. Sparing patients laparotomy reduces postoperative pain, improves recovery of GI function, reduces hospitalization, cuts health care costs, and improves cosmetic results. This approach promises to play a significant role in emergency abdominal situations and will certainly become increasingly important in today's health care environment.