Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 20
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Urol Oncol ; 42(8): 246.e1-246.e5, 2024 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38679529

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: To investigate the actual cost of hematuria evaluation using nationally representative claims data, given that the workup for hematuria burdens the healthcare system with significant associated costs. We hypothesized that evaluation with contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) confers more cost to hematuria evaluation than renal ultrasound (US). METHODS: Using a national, privately insured database (MarketScan), we identified all individuals with an incident diagnosis of hematuria. We included patients who underwent cystoscopy and upper tract imaging within 3 months of diagnosis. We tabulated the costs of the imaging study as well as the total healthcare cost per patient. A multivariable model was developed to evaluate patient factors associated with total healthcare costs. RESULTS: We identified 318,680 patients with hematuria who underwent evaluation. Median costs associated with upper tract imaging were $362 overall, $504 for CT with contrast, $163 for US, $680 for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), $283 for CT without contrast, and $294 for retrograde pyelogram. Median cystoscopy cost was $283. Total healthcare costs per patient were highest when utilizing MRI and CT imaging. When adjusted for comorbidities, the use of any imaging other than ultrasound was associated with higher costs. CONCLUSIONS: In this nationally representative analysis, hematuria evaluation confers a significant cost burden, while the primary factor associated with higher costs of screening was imaging type. Based upon reduced cost of US-based strategies, further investigation should delineate its cost-effectiveness in the diagnosis of urological disease.


Assuntos
Bases de Dados Factuais , Hematúria , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Humanos , Hematúria/economia , Hematúria/diagnóstico por imagem , Hematúria/diagnóstico , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/economia , Idoso , Ultrassonografia/economia , Ultrassonografia/métodos , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/economia , Adulto Jovem , Cistoscopia/economia , Adolescente , Estados Unidos
2.
N Z Med J ; 133(1527): 71-82, 2020 12 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33332329

RESUMO

AIM: To evaluate prospectively a clinical pathway for investigation of haematuria that involves an initial screening using a urinary biomarker of bladder cancer (Cxbladder Triage™ (CxbT)) in combination with either a renal ultrasound or a computed tomography imaging. Only test-positive patients are referred for specialist assessment and flexible cystoscopy. METHODS: The clinical outcomes of 884 patients with haematuria who presented to their general practitioner were reviewed. Outcome measurements included the findings of laboratory tests, imaging, cystoscopies, specialist assessment and histology. RESULTS: Forty-eight transitional cell carcinomas (TCC) and three small cell carcinomas were diagnosed in the study cohort. The clinical pathway missed a solitary, small, low-risk TCC. When combined, imaging and CxbT had a sensitivity of 98.1% and a negative predictive value of 99.9% to detect a bladder cancer. Follow-up for a median of 21 months showed no further new cases of bladder cancer had occurred in the patient cohort. Review of all new bladder cancers diagnosed in the 15 months following the study showed that none had been missed by haematuria assessment using the clinical pathway. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of CxbT and imaging reliably identifies patients with haematuria who can be managed safely in primary care without the need for a secondary care referral and a flexible cystoscopy.


Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células de Transição/diagnóstico por imagem , Carcinoma de Células de Transição/urina , Procedimentos Clínicos , Hematúria/etiologia , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/urina , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Biomarcadores/urina , Carcinoma de Células de Transição/complicações , Cistite/complicações , Cistite/diagnóstico , Cistoscopia , Feminino , Hematúria/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Rim/diagnóstico por imagem , Cálculos Renais/complicações , Cálculos Renais/diagnóstico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Prospectivos , Doenças Prostáticas/complicações , Doenças Prostáticas/diagnóstico , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Ultrassonografia , Procedimentos Desnecessários , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/complicações , Infecções Urinárias/complicações , Infecções Urinárias/diagnóstico , Adulto Jovem
3.
Urology ; 133: 40-45, 2019 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31255539

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To model the risk of radiation-induced malignancy from computed tomography urography (CTU) in evaluation of gross hematuria and contrast this with the benefits of urinary tract cancer detection when compared to renal ultrasound. METHODS: A PUBMED-based literature search was performed to identify model inputs. Estimates of radiation-induced malignancy rates were obtained from the Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation VII report with dose extrapolation using the linear no-threshold model. RESULTS: Male gender and age over 50 years were associated with a relative risk of upper tract malignancy of 2.04 and 2.95, respectively. The risk of upper tract malignancy missed by renal ultrasound ranged from 0.055% in females under 50 to 0.51% in males over 50. Risk of CTU-induced malignancy with associated loss of life expectancy ranged from 0.25% and 0.027 years in females under 50 to 0.08% and 0.0054 years in males over 50. For CTU to be superior to renal ultrasound, an undiagnosed upper tract malignancy would have to carry a loss of life expectancy of 49.2 years in females under 50, 13.4 years in males under 50, 2.6 years in females over 50, and 1.1 years in males over 50. CONCLUSION: In low-risk patients, CTU for evaluation of gross hematuria may carry a significant risk of radiation-induced secondary malignancy relative to the diagnostic benefit offered over renal ultrasound.


Assuntos
Hematúria/diagnóstico por imagem , Rim/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Induzidas por Radiação/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Induzidas por Radiação/etiologia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Urografia/efeitos adversos , Urografia/métodos , Neoplasias Urológicas/diagnóstico por imagem , Feminino , Hematúria/etiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição de Risco , Ultrassonografia/efeitos adversos
4.
Urology ; 122: 83-88, 2018 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30138684

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess geographic variation in cystoscopy rates among women vs men with suspected bladder cancer, lending insight into gender-specific differences in cystoscopic evaluation. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of all fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries within 306 Hospital Referral Regions (HRRs) who received care in 2014. For each HRR, we calculated the age- and race-adjusted cystoscopy rate for women and men as our primary outcome. The rate was the number of beneficiaries who underwent cystoscopy for bladder cancer symptoms (using procedure and ICD-9 diagnosis codes) divided by all beneficiaries in the HRR. We used the coefficient of variation to compare relative variability of cystoscopy rates. RESULTS: Overall, 173,551 women (n = 14.8 million) and 286,090 men (n = 11.5 million) underwent cystoscopy in 2014. While women received less cystoscopies compared to men (mean 11.0 vs 23.5 per 1000, P < .001), there was greater variation in cystoscopy rates among women (coefficient of variation 27.5 vs 23.5, P = .010). When restricting to ICD-9 codes for hematuria only, women continued to demonstrate greater variation in cystoscopy rates (coefficient of variation 27.8 vs 24.2, P = .022). Findings were robust across larger HRR sizes-thereby removing some random variation seen in smaller HRRs-as well as across years 2010, 2011, 2012, and 2013. CONCLUSION: Cystoscopy rates are lower in women than men, likely due to their lower bladder cancer incidence. However, there is greater variation in cystoscopy rates among women with symptoms of bladder cancer. This may reflect increased provider uncertainty whether to refer and work-up women with suspected bladder cancer.


Assuntos
Cistoscopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/estatística & dados numéricos , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hematúria/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/diagnóstico por imagem , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos Transversais , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/métodos , Planos de Pagamento por Serviço Prestado/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Hematúria/etiologia , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Fatores Sexuais , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/complicações , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/epidemiologia
5.
Urol Oncol ; 34(10): 437-51, 2016 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27641313

RESUMO

RATIONALE: Assessment of patients with asymptomatic microhematuria (aMh) has been a challenge to urologists for decades. The aMh is a condition with a high prevalence in the general population and also an established diagnostic indicator of bladder cancer. Acknowledging aMh needs to be assessed within a complex context, multiple guidelines have been developed to identify individuals at high risk of being diagnosed with bladder cancer. MATERIAL & METHODS: This structured review and consensus of the International Bladder Cancer Network (IBCN) identified and examined 9 major guidelines. These recommendations are partly based on findings from a long-term study on the effects of home dipstick testing, but also on the assumption that early detection of malignancy might be beneficial. RESULTS: Despite similar designs, these guidelines differ in a variety of parameters including definition of aMh, rating of risks, use of imaging modalities, and the role of urine cytology. In addition, recommendations for further follow-up after negative initial assessment are controversial. In this review, different aspects for aMh assessment are analyzed based upon the evidence currently available. DISCUSSION: We question whether adherence to the complicated algorithms as recommended by most guidelines is practical for routine use. Based upon a consensus, the authors postulate a need for better tools. New concepts for risk assessment permitting improved risk stratification and prepone cystoscopy before refined imaging procedures (computed tomography scan and magnetic resonance imaging) are suggested.


Assuntos
Hematúria/diagnóstico por imagem , Hematúria/epidemiologia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Avaliação de Sintomas/normas , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/epidemiologia , Doenças Assintomáticas , Biomarcadores/urina , Consenso , Cistoscopia , Hematúria/patologia , Hematúria/urina , Humanos , Prevalência , Medição de Risco/métodos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Ultrassonografia , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/complicações , Urina/citologia , Urografia
6.
Urology ; 95: 34-8, 2016 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27318261

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess the costs associated with incidental extraurinary findings on computed tomography urogram (CTU) in patients with asymptomatic microscopic hematuria. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed to identify all CTUs performed for asymptomatic microscopic hematuria at our institution from 2012 to 2014. All genitourinary (GU) and incidental extraurinary findings were documented. Further clinical follow-up to May 2015 was reviewed to determine if any referrals, tests, imaging, and/or procedures were ordered based on the initial CTU. Cost estimates were determined using the Medicare physician reimbursement rate. RESULTS: Two hundred two patients were evaluated with CTU for asymptomatic microscopic hematuria. GU malignancy was documented in 2 patients (0.99%), both renal masses suspicious for renal cell carcinoma. Sixty patients were found to have kidney stones, of which 26 had stones ≥5 mm. Incidental extraurinary findings were found in 150 (74.3%) patients, requiring further imaging costs of $17,242 or $85.35 per patient screened. Twelve patients required a total of 20 procedures for a cost of $54,655. The total cost related to extraurinary findings was $140,290 or $694.50 per initial patient screened. CONCLUSION: The incidental extraurinary findings detected on CTU can lead to expensive and invasive testing and treatment. Whereas costs associated with further workup were high, the overall outcomes in both GU and non-GU cancer diagnosis were low. Future analysis should focus on limiting the cost and invasiveness of our evaluation for this condition.


Assuntos
Doenças Assintomáticas , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Hematúria/diagnóstico por imagem , Hematúria/economia , Achados Incidentais , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/economia , Urografia/economia , Urografia/métodos , Feminino , Hematúria/etiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos
7.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 204(6): 1160-7, 2015 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26001224

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The purposes of this study of patients who underwent CT for hematuria were to understand how radiologists' recommendations regarding incidental findings affect their management, assess long-term outcomes from important incidental findings, and calculate estimates of downstream costs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of 1295 patients who underwent CT for hematuria from 2004 to 2006 at our institution. Incidental findings outside the urinary tract were recorded and imaging reports categorized on the basis of recommendations, interpretations, and actions of radiologists. Patients with important incidental findings were followed for 6-8 years. Costs related to incidental findings were estimated and tallied. RESULTS: Two hundred fourteen important findings were found in 143 of 1295 patients, with 93 patients undergoing clinical follow-up, including 30 patients who underwent invasive procedures leading to 154 hospital days and 16 operations (group 1). In 63 patients, no invasive procedures were performed (group 2). Costs were higher in group 1 than in group 2, and the average per-patient cost for all 1295 patients was $385. In group 1, 95% of recommendations were followed compared with 80% in group 2. There was probable therapeutic benefit in 25 of 143 (17%) patients. There were serious complications in six of 143 (4.2%) patients, including death in two of 143 (1.4%). CONCLUSION: Radiologists' recommendations were generally followed for important incidental findings. These recommendations can direct the most cost-efficient and effective care for incidental findings. Although some patients with incidental findings had probable benefit, others incurred morbidity or mortality. A small number of invasive procedures resulted in substantial costs in this symptomatic population. Costs averaged over the entire population were higher than have been previously reported.


Assuntos
Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hematúria/diagnóstico por imagem , Hematúria/economia , Achados Incidentais , Papel do Médico , Radiologia/economia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/economia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Alabama/epidemiologia , Comorbidade , Feminino , Hematúria/epidemiologia , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Radiologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Encaminhamento e Consulta/economia , Encaminhamento e Consulta/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores de Risco , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/estatística & dados numéricos , Revisão da Utilização de Recursos de Saúde
8.
Br J Radiol ; 85(1017): 1303-6, 2012 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22573297

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: We set out to determine the prevalence of unsuspected findings from CT urography (CTU) performed for haematuria and to evaluate the economic implications associated with the subsequent management of these findings. METHODS: We analysed the results of 778 consecutive CTU scans performed in a haematuria clinic between 2008 and 2010. We excluded cases where diagnosis of an abnormality had been made prior to CTU. Costs incurred during the follow-up of unsuspected findings were calculated following guidance set out in the NHS Costing Manual 2009/10. RESULTS: 778 CTU scans were performed for patients attending a haematuria clinic from 2008 to 2010. 455 men and 323 women underwent CTU scan; they had a median age of 62 years. 56% of scans were found to have unexpected extra-urinary findings (587 abnormalities in 439 scans). Common findings included diverticular disease (138, 17.7%), adrenal masses [85, 10.9%; 40 (5.1%) of which were indeterminate], lung abnormalities (67, 8.6%), gall bladders containing calculi (44, 5.7%), adnexal cysts (25, 7.7% of women) and aortic aneurysms (18, 2.3%). These findings led to a total of 136 outpatient appointments, 88 radiological investigations and 11 procedures (4 of which were major). The overall cost incurred was £47,366, or £60 per patient. CONCLUSION: CTU is associated with a high rate of unsuspected findings. There is an economic implication to performing CT scanning in this setting, in which further unanticipated investigation and treatment cost is approximately £60 per patient.


Assuntos
Hematúria/diagnóstico por imagem , Hematúria/economia , Achados Incidentais , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/economia , Urografia/economia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Hematúria/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/estatística & dados numéricos , Reino Unido/epidemiologia , Urografia/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto Jovem
9.
BJU Int ; 99(1): 111-6, 2007 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17034493

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess the value of three-dimensional (3D) vs two-dimensional (2D) ultrasonography (US) in the diagnostic evaluation of the urinary bladder in patients with haematuria. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 42 patients with painless haematuria and/or irritative voiding symptoms were examined with 2D- and 3D-US. US was done with an Acuson Sequoia unit (Siemens Medical Sol. Mountain View, CA, USA) and the Perspective(R) 3D technique, to assess the presence of bladder lesions, including bladder cancer, bladder wall hypertrophy with trabeculation and diverticula, mucosal bladder folds or re-growth of the prostate mimicking a bladder tumour. The imaging findings were compared with cystoscopy and/or bladder biopsy. RESULTS: In 21 of the 42 patients (50%) cystoscopy with bladder biopsy revealed bladder cancer. Overall, 3D-US gave a correct diagnosis for 36 of 42 patients (86%). All 21 bladder cancers were correctly diagnosed, and 15 (71%) of the 21 benign bladder lesions were correctly identified. By contrast, 2D-US findings gave suspected bladder cancer in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: 3D-US is significantly more accurate than standard 2D-US in the diagnostic evaluation of patients with haematuria. Thus, this diagnostic technique might be useful for routine evaluation of the urinary bladder.


Assuntos
Hematúria/diagnóstico por imagem , Imageamento Tridimensional/instrumentação , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/diagnóstico por imagem , Idoso , Feminino , Hematúria/etiologia , Humanos , Imageamento Tridimensional/normas , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ultrassonografia
10.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 185(4): 1051-6, 2005 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16177432

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: We determined the prevalence of incidental extraurinary findings at MDCT urography in patients with hematuria and evaluated their impact on subsequent imaging costs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three hundred forty-four consecutive patients with hematuria were evaluated with MDCT urography. Incidental extraurinary findings were classified into three categories according to their clinical significance (high, moderate, and low). Medical records were reviewed, and the cost of additional imaging examinations was calculated using 2002 Medicare reimbursements. RESULTS: Extraurinary findings were detected in 259 patients (75.3%). Of these, 62 patients (18.0%) had highly clinically significant findings, including three cancers. Only 20 (32.3%) of the 62 patients with highly clinically significant findings underwent additional imaging for findings of high clinical significance; 10 (16.1%) were followed clinically, and 32 (51.6%) were not evaluated. The most prevalent highly clinically significant findings were pulmonary nodules and lymphadenopathy. Of the 344 patients studied, 116 (33.7%) had findings in which the highest level of clinical significance was moderate; 81 (23.5%) had findings of only low clinical significance. Nine patients (2.6%) underwent additional imaging for findings of moderate or low clinical significance. Overall, 29 patients (8.4%) underwent further imaging at a cost of $14,231 (average of $41.37 per patient). CONCLUSION: Although incidental extraurinary findings were common at MDCT urography, only a small percentage of patients were imaged further. MDCT urography, when used to evaluate patients with hematuria, detects extraurinary disease without a substantial increase in per-patient imaging costs.


Assuntos
Hematúria/diagnóstico por imagem , Achados Incidentais , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência
11.
Rofo ; 177(10): 1436-46, 2005 Oct.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16170715

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to prospectively compare intravenous pyelography (IVP) and combined unenhanced and excretory phase multidetector-row CT (MDCT) with respect to image quality, diagnostic certainty and diagnostic concordance with the final clinical diagnosis in patients with painless microhematuria. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Unenhanced MDCT, IVP and excretory phase MDCT were performed in 59 consecutive patients (21 women, 38 men, mean age 56 +/- 19 years, range 23 - 83 years) with painless microhematuria of unknown origin during a single examination with a single contrast media application (100 ml, non-ionic iodinated contrast media). Images were assessed by two experienced urogenital radiologists in consensus for image quality, diagnostic certainty of stone detection, obstruction, parenchymal lesions and morphological distinctive features. Imaging diagnoses of MDCT and IVP were compared with the final clinical diagnoses. In case of failure to detect an relevant pathology, the final clinical diagnosis was established after a mean follow-up period of 18 +/- 6 months (10 months to 2 years). Costs and radiation exposure of IVP and MDCT were compared. RESULTS: MDCT scan performed better than IVP in terms of image quality for all regarded variables. Image quality of MDCT was rated in all parameters as very good or good; the image quality of IVP differed in a wide range. MDCT and IVP reached a sensitivity of 100 % and 50 % for stone detection (n = 14, p = 0.008), respectively. Two bladder stones were not detected by IVU but correctly seen with MDCT. MDCT and IVP were unsatisfactory for detecting transitional cell carcinomas (n = 4, 2 of 4 detected with MDCT, 0 of 4 detected with IVU). One false positive transitional cell carcinoma was detected with IVP, none with MDCT. Additional relevant pathological changes (one teratoma, one abdominal aortic aneurysma and one abscess) were detected using MDCT but missed with IVP. In 38 of 59 patients (64 %) imaging and clinical follow-up over up to 24 months did not reveal any pathology to explain the microhematuria. The costs of the IVP (283 Euro) were lower compared with non-enhanced MDCT (380 Euro) or combined non-enhanced and contrast-enhanced MDCT (560 Euro). The radiation exposure was 23 - 27 mSv for MDCT and 2.3 mSv for IVP. CONCLUSION: MDCT performed better regarding image quality, subjective diagnostic certainty and diagnostic results with respect to stone detection. Since urolithiasis is a frequent cause of painless microhematuria MDCT is recommended as the initial imaging modality rather than IVU.


Assuntos
Hematúria/diagnóstico por imagem , Aumento da Imagem/métodos , Tomografia Computadorizada Espiral/métodos , Cálculos Urinários/diagnóstico por imagem , Urografia/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Meios de Contraste/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Hematúria/etiologia , Humanos , Imageamento Tridimensional/métodos , Injeções Intravenosas , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dor/etiologia , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Cálculos Urinários/complicações
12.
J Urol ; 168(6): 2457-60, 2002 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12441939

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The ideal imaging study for evaluation of the upper urinary tract in patients with microhematuria has been debated. We prospectively compared the diagnostic yield of computerized tomography (CT) to excretory urography (IVP) in the initial evaluation of asymptomatic microhematuria. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between December 1998 and June 2001, 115 patients presenting with asymptomatic microhematuria underwent CT and IVP before cystoscopy. Helical CT images with 5 mm. adrenal and kidney slices with and without contrast material were followed by delayed 5 mm. ureteral contrast images through the bladder base. Each CT and IVP was examined by a radiologist who was blinded to the result of the other imaging study. Diagnostic yields of the imaging techniques were compared using the test of 2 proportions and chi-square analysis. RESULTS: Radiographic abnormalities were noted on CT or IVP in 38 patients. Sensitivity was 100% for CT and 60.5% for IVP, and specificity 97.4% for CT and 90.9% for IVP. CT accuracy was 98.3% compared to IVP accuracy which was 80.9% (p <0.001). A total of 40 nonurological diagnoses were made by CT, including 3 abdominal aortic aneurysms and 1 iliac artery aneurysm. No additional diagnoses were made by IVP. Fewer additional radiographic studies were recommended after CT than after IVP. CONCLUSIONS: The use of CT in the initial evaluation of asymptomatic microhematuria results in better diagnostic yield. In addition, more nonurological diagnoses can be made and less additional radiography is needed to confirm a diagnosis.


Assuntos
Hematúria/etiologia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Urografia , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagem , Custos e Análise de Custo , Feminino , Hematúria/diagnóstico por imagem , Hematúria/economia , Humanos , Aneurisma Ilíaco/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Renais/complicações , Neoplasias Renais/diagnóstico por imagem , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Prospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/economia , Cálculos Urinários/complicações , Cálculos Urinários/diagnóstico por imagem , Urografia/economia
14.
J Urol ; 167(2 Pt 1): 547-54, 2002 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11792916

RESUMO

PURPOSE: We report the results of a multicenter study of arterial, corticomedullary, nephrographic and excretory phase helical computerized tomography (CT) for detecting and characterizing abnormalities causing asymptomatic microscopic hematuria. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated 350 consecutive patients, including 216 men and 134 women 23 to 88 years old, with asymptomatic microscopic hematuria of undetermined cause at 4 medical centers. Patients with known urological pathology were excluded from study. We performed 4 helical CT sequences, including pre-enhancement phase imaging from kidney to symphysis pubis, arterial phase imaging of the kidney and lower pelvis, corticomedullary nephrographic phase imaging of the kidney and lower pelvis, and excretory phase imaging from kidney to symphysis pubis with 2 to 5 mm. collimation and 1 to 1.5 pitch. RESULTS: Of 171 proved lesions 158 were correctly diagnosed. There were 10 false-positive and 13 false-negative diagnoses, indicating 0.9239 sensitivity, 0.9441 specificity, 0.9404 positive and 0.9285 negative predictive values, (p <0.001). All cases of congenital renal lesions, calculous disease, ureteral lesion and neoplastic lesion of the bladder were correctly diagnosed, as were 40 of 41 inflammatory renal, 21 of 23 renal masses and 13 of 16 inflammatory bladder lesions. In 27 patients with renal calculi the study was limited to pre-enhancement spiral CT. CONCLUSIONS: A positive diagnosis rate of 45.1% (158 of 350 cases) for the causes of heretofore refractory cases of hematuria with high sensitivity and specificity attest to the effectiveness of our hematuria CT protocol and support its use.


Assuntos
Hematúria/diagnóstico por imagem , Nefropatias/diagnóstico por imagem , Doenças da Bexiga Urinária/diagnóstico por imagem , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Hematúria/etiologia , Humanos , Nefropatias/complicações , Neoplasias Renais/complicações , Neoplasias Renais/diagnóstico por imagem , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Radiografia , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Doenças da Bexiga Urinária/complicações
15.
Am Surg ; 67(6): 550-4; discussion 555-6, 2001 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11409803

RESUMO

Renal artery injury is a rare complication of blunt abdominal trauma. Increasing use of CT scans to evaluate blunt abdominal trauma identifies more blunt renal artery injuries (BRAIs) that may have otherwise been missed. We identified patients with BRAI to examine the incidence and to evaluate the current diagnosis and management strategies. Patients admitted from 1986 to 2000 at a regional Level I trauma center sustaining BRAI were evaluated. Patients undergoing revascularization or nonoperative management were followed for renovascular hypertension. Twenty-eight patients with BRAI were identified out of 36,938 blunt trauma admissions between 1986 and 2000 (incidence 0.08%). Most renal artery injuries were diagnosed by CT scans (93%) with seven confirmatory angiograms. Nine patients had nephrectomy (one bilateral), and three patients with unilateral injuries were revascularized. Sixteen were managed nonoperatively including one patient who had endovascular stent placement. Three patients died from shock and sepsis. Follow-up for all patients ranged from one month to 8 years. Two patients developed hypertension: one who was revascularized (33%) and one was managed nonoperatively (6%). The frequency of diagnosis of BRAI is increasing because of the increased use of CT. Nonoperative management of unilateral injuries can be successful with a 6 per cent risk for developing renovascular hypertension. The role of endovascular stenting is promising, and further study is necessary.


Assuntos
Traumatismos Abdominais/diagnóstico por imagem , Artéria Renal/lesões , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/diagnóstico por imagem , Traumatismos Abdominais/epidemiologia , Traumatismos Abdominais/terapia , Adulto , Angiografia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Hematúria/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Incidência , Laparotomia , Masculino , Nefrectomia , Diálise Renal , Estudos Retrospectivos , Stents , Tennessee/epidemiologia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/epidemiologia , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/terapia
16.
J Urol ; 141(5): 1095-8, 1989 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2709493

RESUMO

To develop criteria to determine which patients require radiographic assessment after blunt renal trauma, we studied prospectively 1,146 consecutive patients with either blunt (1,007) or penetrating (139) renal trauma between 1977 and 1987. Based on our preliminary results from 1977 to 1983, in which none of the 221 patients with blunt trauma and microscopic hematuria without shock had significant renal injuries, we designed a prospective study to determine if such patients could be managed safely without radiographic staging. During the last 10 years significant renal injuries were found in 44 patients (4.4 per cent) with blunt trauma and gross hematuria or microscopic hematuria associated with shock, and in 88 patients (63 per cent) with penetrating trauma. No significant injuries occurred in the 812 patients with blunt trauma and microscopic hematuria without shock, 404 of whom had complete radiographic assessment and 408 of whom did not. There were no delayed operations or significant sequelae related to the renal injury in these patients. We conclude that complete radiographic staging is mandatory in patients with penetrating trauma to the flank or abdomen and in patients with blunt trauma associated with either gross hematuria or microscopic hematuria and shock. However, patients with blunt trauma, microscopic hematuria and no shock who do not have associated major intra-abdominal injuries can be managed safely without excretory urography.


Assuntos
Rim/lesões , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/diagnóstico por imagem , Ferimentos Penetrantes/diagnóstico por imagem , Traumatismos Abdominais/diagnóstico por imagem , Emergências , Hematúria/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Radiografia , Choque Traumático/diagnóstico por imagem , Fatores de Tempo
17.
Eur J Radiol ; 8(3): 135-9, 1988 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3169023

RESUMO

Four to 20% positive findings were found in a review of 1913 excretory urographics. Possibly relevant findings were 20% in patients referred for infectious disease, 10% in hypertensive disease, 6% in hematuria and 4% in neoplasms. Urography influenced treatment mainly in the 2 groups with few positive findings. The costs for positive findings may be acceptable in patients with hematuria or suspicion of neoplasms, but are too high in the other groups. Until ultrasonography can replace intravenous urography as the first screening method in upper urinary tract disease, the patient selection for urography in infectious and hypertensive disease should be improved.


Assuntos
Hematúria/diagnóstico por imagem , Hipertensão Renal/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Renais/diagnóstico por imagem , Infecções Urinárias/diagnóstico por imagem , Urografia , Adulto , Custos e Análise de Custo , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino
18.
Urology ; 31(6): 469-73, 1988 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3131945

RESUMO

Optimal management in renal trauma necessitates an adequate delineation of location and extent of the renal injury. However, as a result of the rapid rise in the costs of medical care, a complete and elaborate radiographic evaluation of all patients with suspected renal injury no longer seems justified. We reviewed our experience with 622 consecutive cases of renal injury to find the most economical diagnostic sequence with the clearest findings. An intravenous pyelography (IVP) still is the first and mostly the sole examination to do in patients with clinical or laboratory evidence of renal trauma. Microscopic hematuria alone is no longer an indication to perform urography. If indicated, an IVP should be performed as an emergency procedure in all cases and especially in the patient with multiple trauma. Children are more susceptible to renal trauma and require a higher index of suspicion. In the few patients with indeterminate findings on urography, renal angiography must be considered (especially when renal pedicle injury is suspected) or a computerized tomography (CT) scan (especially in the patient with multiple trauma). Ultrasound and CT examinations are not to be done on a routine basis in the initial assessment or the follow-up of renal trauma.


Assuntos
Rim/lesões , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Análise Custo-Benefício , Emergências , Feminino , Hematúria/diagnóstico por imagem , Hematúria/economia , Humanos , Rim/diagnóstico por imagem , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos , Artéria Renal/diagnóstico por imagem , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/economia , Ultrassonografia/economia , Urografia/economia
19.
J Urol ; 137(3): 449-51, 1987 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3820372

RESUMO

Fifteen years of personal experience have yielded 157 penetrating and 225 blunt urological injuries, including only 2 instances of simultaneous upper and lower tract involvement (0.5 per cent). A similar review of 2,750 cases from the urological literature has yielded only 17 patients with simultaneous upper and lower tract injuries (0.6 per cent). Blunt trauma was responsible in all but 1 of these 17 patients (95 per cent). Based upon these observations, it is suggested that comprehensive radiographic evaluation of traumatic hematuria or suspected occult urological trauma unnecessarily may be expensive and dilatory, and that evaluation may be limited routinely to the area of maximum injury.


Assuntos
Rim/lesões , Ureter/lesões , Uretra/lesões , Bexiga Urinária/lesões , Urografia , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/diagnóstico por imagem , Ferimentos Penetrantes/diagnóstico por imagem , Custos e Análise de Custo , Hematúria/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos
20.
Ann Emerg Med ; 15(3): 270-2, 1986 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3511789

RESUMO

Injuries to the lower genitourinary tract may occur with penetrating or severe blunt lower abdominal trauma. Commonly associated findings are pelvic fractures and gross hematuria or a bloody urethral discharge. Retrograde cystourethrography should be performed in all cases of penetrating trauma when lower genitourinary tract injury is suspected. We recommend retrograde urethrography in male patients with a pelvic fracture or significant lower abdominal or perineal trauma without a fracture when associated with gross hematuria, a bloody urethral discharge, inability to void, swelling, ecchymosis or hematoma of the perineum or penis, or a "high-riding" or boggy prostate. Cystography should follow urethrography after a urethral injury has been excluded.


Assuntos
Emergências , Ossos Pélvicos/lesões , Bexiga Urinária/diagnóstico por imagem , Feminino , Hematúria/diagnóstico por imagem , Hematúria/etiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Ruptura , Uretra/diagnóstico por imagem , Uretra/lesões , Bexiga Urinária/lesões , Urografia/economia , Doenças Urológicas/diagnóstico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA