Clinical and economic burden of immune tolerance induction in entire patients with hemophilia A: Insights from a real-world Korean setting.

INTRODUCTION: The most notable challenge facing hemophilia A treatment is the development of inhibitors against factor VIII, resulting in increased clinical and socioeconomic burdens due to the need for expensive bypassing agents (BPAs). Although immune tolerance induction (ITI) is currently the primary approach for inhibiting and reducing the inhibitors, the lengthy duration of ITI necessitates the continued use of BPA to manage bleeding episodes. In this study, we aimed to obtain real-world evidence on the clinical and economic aspects and associated burdens experienced by patients with hemophilia A with inhibitors undergoing ITI in Korea. METHODS: Claims data from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2020, were used in this study. The study cohort comprised patients with hemophilia A undergoing ITI, who were categorized into three groups: successful, failed, or continuation of ITI. We evaluated clinical and economic burdens, including monthly healthcare visits, medication costs, and total medical expenses. RESULTS: The study involved 33 cases of ITI across 32 patients. Excluding seven continuation cases where success could not be determined at the observation point, the estimated success rate of ITI was 80.8 %. The median duration of ITI for all patients was 25.7 months. While no significant disparities were noted in the ITI duration between successful and unsuccessful cases (24.51 vs. 25.66 months), substantial discrepancies were observed in the duration of BPA usage (11.10 vs. 25.66 months) and the number of prescribed BPAs (1.79 vs. 2.97). CONCLUSION: Successful ITI reduced both clinical and economic burdens, resulting in decreased monthly medication expenses and overall medical costs.

Multicenter assessment and longitudinal study of the prevalence of antibodies and related adaptive immune responses to AAV in adult males with hemophilia.

Adeno-associated virus (AAV) based gene therapy has demonstrated effective disease control in hemophilia. However, pre-existing immunity from wild-type AAV exposure impacts gene therapy eligibility. The aim of this multicenter epidemiologic study was to determine the prevalence and persistence of preexisting immunity against AAV2, AAV5, and AAV8, in adult participants with hemophilia A or B. Blood samples were collected at baseline and annually for ≤3 years at trial sites in Austria, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United States. At baseline, AAV8, AAV2, and AAV5 neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) were present in 46.9%, 53.1%, and 53.4% of participants, respectively; these values remained stable at Years 1 and 2. Co-prevalence of NAbs to at least two serotypes and all three serotypes was present at baseline for ~40% and 38.2% of participants, respectively. For each serotype, ~10% of participants who tested negative for NAbs at baseline were seropositive at Year 1. At baseline, 38.3% of participants had detectable cell mediated immunity by ELISpot, although no correlations were observed with the humoral response. In conclusion, participants with hemophilia may have significant preexisting immunity to AAV capsids. Insights from this study may assist in understanding capsid-based immunity trends in participants considering AAV vector-based gene therapy.

A hemophilia A mouse model for the in vivo assessment of emicizumab function.

The bispecific antibody emicizumab is increasingly used for hemophilia A treatment. However, its specificity for human factors IX and X (FIX and FX) has limited its in vivo functional analysis to primate models of acquired hemophilia. Here, we describe a novel mouse model that allows emicizumab function to be examined. Briefly, FVIII-deficient mice received IV emicizumab 24 hours before tail-clip bleeding was performed. A second infusion with human FIX and FX, administered 5 minutes before bleeding, generated consistent levels of emicizumab (0.7-19 mg/dL for 0.5-10 mg/kg doses) and of both FIX and FX (85 and 101 U/dL, respectively, after dosing at 100 U/kg). Plasma from these mice display FVIII-like activity in assays (diluted activated partial thromboplastin time and thrombin generation), similar to human samples containing emicizumab. Emicizumab doses of 1.5 mg/kg and higher significantly reduced blood loss in a tail-clip-bleeding model using FVIII-deficient mice. However, reduction was incomplete compared with mice treated with human FVIII concentrate, and no difference in efficacy between doses was observed. From this model, we deducted FVIII-like activity from emicizumab that corresponded to a dose of 4.5 U of FVIII per kilogram (ie, 9.0 U/dL). Interestingly, combined with a low FVIII dose (5 U/kg), emicizumab provided enough additive activity to allow complete bleeding arrest. This model could be useful for further in vivo analysis of emicizumab.

The national blueprint for future factor VIII inhibitor clinical trials: NHLBI State of the Science (SOS) Workshop on factor VIII inhibitors.

INTRODUCTION: Inhibitor formation is a major complication of haemophilia for which clinical trials are planned. Despite emerging novel haemostatic agents, challenges of rare disease trials are limited subjects and lack of an organized research organization with strategic resources and partnerships. AIM: The charge to Working Group 1 was to establish scientific priorities and innovative implementation strategies to conduct inhibitor prevention and eradication trials. To determine feasibility of trial design and strategic resources and partnerships to be leveraged, two clinical trial concepts were considered. RESULTS: For the Inhibitor Prevention Trial, we considered adaptive design with early stopping rules, dynamic randomization and Master Protocol models to reduce sample size; and registries to provide concurrent controls and natural history data. For the Inhibitor Eradication Trial using gene therapy, an adaptive design was considered in a small number of subjects, and, if safe and meeting regulatory requirements, enrolment would be expanded. A Haemophilia Clinical Trials Group (HCTG) infrastructure was envisioned, with uniform procedures and standardized outcomes, data collection and assays, within which trial concepts would be developed, vetted and prioritized by a Steering Committee, and submitted to NIH and other research sponsors for review and funding. Mechanistic studies would be embedded within the trials, early stage investigators trained and mentored, and the research infrastructure established within the haemophilia centre (HTC) network and supported by partnerships with foundations, community, federal partners and industry. CONCLUSION: The success of inhibitor trials will depend on innovative trial design and an organized HCTG research infrastructure, leveraged through community partnerships.

Inhibitor clinical burden of disease: a comparative analysis of the CHESS data.

BACKGROUND: Patients with hemophilia and inhibitors generally face greater disease burden compared to patients without inhibitors. While raising awareness of relative burden may improve the standard of care for patients with inhibitors, comparative data are sparse. Analyzing data drawn from the Cost of Haemophilia across Europe - a Socioeconomic Survey (CHESS) study, the aim of this study was to compare the clinical burden of disease in patients with severe hemophilia with and without inhibitors. Hemophilia specialists (N = 139) across five European countries completed an online survey between January-April 2015, providing demographic, clinical and 12-month ambulatory/secondary care activity data for 1285 patients. Patients with hemophilia who currently presented with inhibitors and those who never had inhibitors were matched on baseline characteristics via propensity score matching. Outcomes were compared between the two cohorts using a paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed-rank or McNemar's test. RESULTS: The proportion of patients who currently presented with inhibitors was 4.5% (58/1285). Compared to PS-matched patients without inhibitors, patients with inhibitors experienced more than twice the mean annual number of bleeds (mean ± standard deviation, 8.29 ± 9.18 vs 3.72 ± 3.95; p < .0001) and joint bleeds (2.17 ± 1.90 vs 0.98 ± 1.15; p < .0001), and required more hemophilia-related (mean ± standard deviation, 1.79 ± 1.83 vs 0.64 ± 1.13) and bleed-related hospitalizations (1.86 ± 1.88 vs 0.81 ± 1.26), hemophilia-related consultations (9.30 ± 4.99 vs 6.77 ± 4.47), and outpatient visits (22.09 ± 17.77 vs 11.48 ± 16.00) (all, p < .001). More than one-half (53.5%) experienced moderate/severe pain necessitating medication compared to one-third (32.8%) of patients without inhibitors (p = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with hemophilia and inhibitors exhibited greater clinical burden and higher resource utilization compared to their peers without inhibitors. Strategies for improving the standard of care may alleviate burden in this population.

Haemophilia care in Latin America: Assessment and perspectives.

INTRODUCTION: The study is the first application of the Principles of Haemophilia Care for Europe (PHCE) in other regions of the world, specifically in Latin America. OBJECTIVE: To identify strengths in the care of haemophilia, and the aspects that should be improved. METHODS: The information was obtained through a questionnaire designed according to the PHCE and answered by specialists in mid-2016. The countries included were as follows: Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Mexico, Panama, Dominican Republic and Venezuela. RESULTS: In most countries, there is a central organization for haemophilia care supported by local groups. The existence of a national registry of people with haemophilia (PWH) was verified in eight countries. Centres of integrated care are located in large cities. In the majority of countries, there was no evidence of the participation of multiple actors in the decision-making. The supply of factor concentrates presents constraints, although it is reported as adequate in half of the countries. In most countries, home treatment is available under special conditions. In most countries, there are restrictions on the use of prophylaxis. The coordination of specialized and emergency services depends on each centre. Unrestricted treatment of inhibitors is performed in most countries. In all countries, there are human resources training programmes; however, clinical and health services researches are not widely developed. CONCLUSION: The study identifies the initial situation of principles of care, as well as the alternatives that must be implemented to achieve improvements in the quality of life of PWH in the region.

The socioeconomic burden of patients affected by hemophilia with inhibitors.

Hemophilia is associated with a high financial burden on individuals, healthcare systems, and society. The development of inhibitors significantly increases the socioeconomic burden of the diseases. This study aimed to review and describe the burden of hemophilia with inhibitors, providing a reference scenario to assess the impact of new products in the real word. Two systematic literature reviews were performed to collect data on (i) health economics and (ii) health-related quality of life evidences in hemophilic patients with inhibitors. The costs associated with patients with hemophilia and inhibitors are more than 3 times greater than the costs incurred in those without inhibitors, with an annual cost per patient that can be higher than €1 000 000. The costs of bypassing agents account for the large majority of the total healthcare direct costs for hemophilia treatment. The quality of life is more compromised in patients with hemophilia and inhibitors compared to those without inhibitors, in particular the physical domains, whereas mental domains were comparable to that of the general population. The development of an inhibitor has a high impact on costs and quality of life. New treatments have the potential to change positively the management and socioeconomic burden of hemophilia with inhibitors.

Methodologies for data collection in congenital haemophilia with inhibitors (CHwI): critical assessment of the literature and lessons learned from recombinant factor VIIa.

AIMS: To systematically review the effectiveness of on-demand treatment with recombinant coagulation factor VIIa (rFVIIa) in congenital haemophilia with inhibitors and, if feasible, perform a meta-analysis of the data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Publications from Embase® , MEDLINE® , MEDLINE® In-Process and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched. Selected publications were reviewed for inclusion by two independent expert reviewers. Discrepancies were reconciled by a third independent reviewer. Data from selected studies were extracted using a predefined grid to ensure uniform and comparable results were captured. RESULTS: A systematic search (cut-off date of 2 May 2016) identified 20 studies (13 observational; seven randomized controlled trials). All studies were of sufficient quality to include in this analysis and comprised 1221 participants, with 5981 bleeds in 746 individuals treated with rFVIIa. Haemostatic overall effectiveness of the individual studies identified ranged from 68% to 100% at ≤12 hours, 86% to 96% at 13-24 hours and 76% to 99% at 24-48 hours with rFVIIa <100 µg/kg, with similar rates reported for the ≥250 µg/kg dose. However, heterogeneity between the studies precluded pooling of results. CONCLUSIONS: Data from the individual studies confirmed that rFVIIa is an effective therapy for the on-demand treatment of bleeds in congenital haemophilia with inhibitors. However, the high levels of heterogeneity between studies precluded pooling of results for a valid, reliable or precise summary measure. There remains a need to implement standardized clinical definitions and measurements for the effectiveness and safety of haemophilia therapies in future clinical trials.

Long-term clinical and economic outcomes in previously untreated paediatric patients with severe haemophilia A: A nationwide real-world study with 700 person-years.

AIM: For previously untreated patients (PUPs) with severe haemophilia A in Finland for the past 2 decades, the standard practice has been to start early primary prophylaxis. We evaluated the long-term clinical outcomes and costs of treatment with high-dose prophylaxis in PUPs from birth to adolescence, including immune tolerance induction (ITI). METHODS: From the medical records of all PUPs born between June 1994 and May 2013 in Finland, we retrospectively extracted data on clinical outcomes and healthcare use. Using linear mixed models, we analysed longitudinal clinical outcome data. To analyse skewed cost data, including zero costs, we applied hurdle regression. RESULTS: All 62 patients received early regular prophylaxis; totally, they have had treatment for nearly 700 patient-years. The median age of starting home treatment was 1.1 years. The mean (SD) annual treatment costs (€ per kg) were 4391€ (3852). For ages 1-3, ITI comprised over half of the costs; in other groups, prophylactic FVIII treatment dominated. With these high costs, however, clinical outcomes were desirable; median (IQR) ABR was low at 0.19 (0.07-0.46) and so was AJBR at 0.06 (0-0.24). Thirteen (21%) patients developed a clinically significant inhibitor, 10 (16%) with a high titre. All ITIs were successful. The mean costs for ITI were 383 448€ (259 085). The expected ITI payback period was 1.81 (95% CI 0.62-12.12) years. CONCLUSIONS: Early high-dose prophylaxis leads to excellent long-term clinical outcomes, and early childhood ITI therapy seems to turn cost-neutral generally already in 2 years.

A decade-long clinical experience on the prophylactic use of activated prothrombin complex concentrate in acquired haemophilia A: a case series from a tertiary care centre.

: In acquired haemophilia A (AHA), risk for recurrent bleeding exists until the inhibitor is detectable. Thus, patients with persisting inhibitor may benefit from prophylaxis with activated prothrombin complex concentrate (aPCC). Potential thromboembolic complications and cost are also factors to consider. Today, no high level evidence or clear recommendations are available on aPCC prophylaxis in AHA. Recently, a small prospective study demonstrated a favourable outcome with short-term, daily administered aPCC infusion. Here we report a retrospective case series of 19 patients with AHA to demonstrate our practice on aPCC prophylaxis. In our practice, clinical bleeding tendency guided our decision on the initiation of aPCC prophylaxis. In patients with serious bleeding tendency, aPCC infusion was prolonged beyond bleeding resolution in a twice-weekly or thrice-weekly regimen. Serious bleeding phenotype included a single episode of life-threatening bleeding or recurrent, severe haemorrhages. Patients who did not present such events were treated on-demand. The preventive dose of aPCC was equal with the lowest effective therapeutic dose. Prophylaxis was continued until the inhibitor disappeared. Eleven patients received aPCC prophylaxis. In nine cases, prophylaxis lasted beyond two months. No severe bleeding developed spontaneously and no thromboembolic complication occurred in the median 16 weeks (interquartile range 9-34) duration of prophylaxis. Eight patients of the nonprophylaxis group did not present any severe haemorrhage. According to our experience, we consider prophylaxis with aPCC effective and well tolerated for patients with AHA and serious bleeding tendency, until the acquired inhibitor persists.

Haemophilia care in Europe - A survey of 37 countries.

INTRODUCTION: The European Haemophilia Consortium (EHC) is an international non-profit organization representing 45 national patients' organizations in Europe. Every 3 years, the EHC circulates a survey to its national member organizations to assess the state of haemophilia care. AIM: The purpose of this exercise is to ascertain information about the organization of haemophilia care and treatment availability at national levels. Furthermore, the survey provides a basis from which the EHC are able to monitor the unmet need and stability of care/treatment access in the individual member countries. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Surveys are distributed to EHC member organizations in English and Russian. Patient organizations are encouraged to share the survey with local clinicians to ensure accuracy of responses. The data collected are in part consistent to provide a longitudinal overview for treatment access, but topical items are included such as ageing. Subsequently, completed surveys are transposed into a database for analysis and reporting. RESULTS: Thirty-seven responses were received from the 45 countries approached, representing an 82% response rate from members. Findings suggest increased access to treatment and some improvement in certain areas of care. However, access to treatment has declined or remained largely unchanged in some countries. CONCLUSION: The survey has been a successful exercise in enabling a greater understanding of the current Haemophilia care landscape across Europe. However, there remain unmet needs in various aspects of patient care, and specific examples include psychosocial care and general preparedness for an ageing haemophilia population.

Estimating the potential cost of a high dose immune tolerance induction (ITI) therapy relative to the cost of a combined therapy of a low dose ITI therapy with bypassing agent prophylaxis.

INTRODUCTION: The International Immune Tolerance Study (I-ITI) demonstrated comparable success rates between low (FVIII 50 IU/kg/TIW) and high dose (FVIII 200 IU/kg/day) regimens. While costlier, the high dose ITI regimen achieved shorter time-to-treatment success with fewer bleeding episodes compared to the low dose ITI regimen. Adding bypassing agent prophylaxis (BAP) to a low dose ITI regimen may reduce bleeding while still being less costly than high dose ITI. AIM AND METHODS: An economic model was developed to compare high dose ITI to low dose ITI with BAP. All model inputs were derived from clinical trials. The I-ITI study indicated a median time to negative inhibitor titre of 4.6 and 9.2 months and average number of bleeds/patient of 4.2 and 9.9 for the high and low dose regimens respectively. Based on the BAP trials, aPCC (85 U/kg/TIW) and rFVIIa (90 µg/kg/day) achieved a 62% and 45% reduction in bleeding frequency respectively. Cost analysis was from a US third party payer perspective and limited to drug costs. One-way, two-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: Costs of low dose ITI with aPCC prophylaxis until negative inhibitor titre is achieved was 24.0% less compared to high dose ITI. Low dose ITI with rFVIIa prophylaxis cost 46.5% more compared to high dose ITI. Model results were robust in the majority of the sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: A low dose ITI regimen with aPCC prophylaxis may be cost saving compared to a high dose ITI regimen with the potential to reduce morbidity by lowering the risk for breakthrough bleeds.

Contemporary issues in the management of von Willebrand disease.

Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common inherited bleeding disorder. Bleeding scores in VWD, focused in particular on mucosal bleeding, can be very useful in the diagnosis and validation of different types of treatment. The results of an extended prospective study with a large amount of information on clinical phenotype and implications in treatment are reviewed in this article. Treatment of mucosal and joint bleeding in severe VWD remains difficult in some patients. Due to the lack of data on the use of prophylaxis in these patients it is difficult to establish optimal treatment regimens. An overview of the literature, with a focus on the ongoing PRO.WILL study, is provided here. Furthermore, understanding the changes in von Willebrand factor (VWF) levels during pregnancy is very important for establishing the optimal management strategy for pregnancy and delivery in women with VWD. A recently published prospective observational cohort study in women with and without VWD during the postpartum period provides important data that should allow the improvement of postpartum treatment protocols.

The burden of inhibitors in haemophilia patients.

The burden of disease in haemophilia patients has wide ranging implications for the family and to society. There is evidence that having a current inhibitor increases the risk of morbidity and mortality. Morbidity is increased by the inability to treat adequately and its consequent disabilities, which then equates to a poor quality of life compared with non-inhibitor patients. The societal cost of care, or `burden of inhibitors', increases with the ongoing presence of an inhibitor. Therefore, it is clear that successful eradication of inhibitors by immune tolerance induction (ITI) is the single most important milestone one can achieve in an inhibitor patient. The type of factor VIII (FVIII) product used in ITI regimens varies worldwide. Despite ongoing debate, there is in vitro and retrospective clinical evidence to support the use of plasma-derived VWF-containing FVIII concentrates in ITI regimens in order to achieve early and high inhibitor eradication success rates.

TRUST trial: BAY 86-6150 use in haemophilia with inhibitors and assessment for immunogenicity.

INTRODUCTION: The most serious and challenging complication of haemophilia treatment is development of inhibitors to replacement factors VIII or IX. Innovative therapies currently being explored for patients with haemophilia and inhibitors include BAY 86-6150, a modified recombinant activated factor VII (FVIIa). Immunogenicity remains a substantial barrier in this endeavour. AIM: To present safety and efficacy results of the BAY 86-6150 study in patients with inhibitors and report detailed analysis of epitope mapping in a patient who developed anti-BAY 86-6150 antibodies. METHODS: Patients aged 12-62 years with moderate or severe haemophilia A or B were eligible for the phase 3 TRUST trial if they had a history of high-titre inhibitors. Four escalating doses of BAY 86-6150 (6.5, 20, 50, 90 µg kg-1 ) were planned with ≥10 patients per dose level. Bleeding episodes were treated with BAY 86-6150. Development of anti-BAY 86-6150 antibodies was considered a serious adverse event. RESULTS: TRUST was discontinued after one patient in the 6.5-µg kg-1 cohort developed anti-BAY 86-6150 neutralizing antibodies following three exposures. The anti-BAY 86-6150 antibodies cross-reacted with and neutralized wild-type FVIIa (WT-FVIIa). Post hoc epitope mapping using peripheral blood mononuclear cells from the responding patient found that none of the 14 peptides unique to BAY 86-6150 were recognized by the patient's T cells, but strong responses were detected against 2 WT-FVIIa peptides. CONCLUSION: In the single patient with haemophilia A who developed anti-BAY 86-6150 antibodies, results of T-cell epitope mapping indicated BAY 86-6150 was no more immunogenic than WT-FVIIa.

Predicting the outcomes of using longer-acting prophylactic factor VIII to treat people with severe hemophilia A: a hypothetical decision analysis.

Essentials No randomized trials have compared long-acting factor VIII (FVIII) with currently used products. A comparison was undertaken using a decision model to predict FVIII use and number of bleeds. In the base case, longer acting FVIII reduced factor use by 17% while resulting in similar bleeds. The value of longer acting FVIII will be largely determined by existing regimens and unit price. Click to hear Prof. Makris's presentation on new treatments in hemophilia SUMMARY: Background Recently, factor VIII (FVIII) products with longer half-lives, such as recombinant FVIII Fc fusion protein (rFVIIIFc), have become available. Use of longer-acting FVIII products will largely depend on effectiveness and cost; no direct evaluations have compared these parameters between conventional and longer-acting FVIII therapies. Objectives To present a hypothetical decision analysis, combining evidence from multiple sources to estimate bleeding frequency, resource use and cost of longer-acting prophylactic products, such as rFVIIIFc, vs. conventional recombinant FVIII (rFVIII). Patients/Methods The decision model used published pharmacokinetic parameters, bleeding frequency vs. time information below a 1-IU dL-1 FVIII trough level, and adherence. Prophylactic treatment scenarios were modelled for a hypothetical patient with severe hemophilia A (<1 IU/dL) receiving rFVIIIFc or rFVIII. Results Infusing twice weekly with rFVIIIFc 42.7 IU kg-1 per dose required less clotting factor than infusing every 56 h with rFVIII 33.75 IU kg-1 per dose; annual bleeding rates were similar. Base case analysis suggested that total FVIII costs were equated when rFVIIIFc cost 1.18 times more per IU than rFVIII, assuming similar adherence. Other modelled scenarios produced similar results, although differences in FVIII consumption were particularly sensitive to assumptions regarding frequency and dose of the rFVIII and rFVIIIFc regimens. For example, decreasing rFVIII from 33.75 IU kg-1 to 30 IU kg-1 per dose decreased the price factor to 1.05. Conclusions Longer-acting FVIII products may reduce FVIII consumption and infusion frequency without compromising hemostatic effect; this should be considered along with other factors (e.g. adherence and underlying FVIII regimen) when evaluating a suitable price for these agents.

Immune tolerance induction in patients with haemophilia a and inhibitors: effectiveness and cost analysis in an European Cohort (The ITER Study).

INTRODUCTION: Although immune tolerance induction (ITI) is considered the first choice treatment to eradicate inhibitors in haemophilia A patients, little is known about outcomes determinants and cost magnitude. AIM AND METHODS: A retrospective, multicentre study was conducted to assess the relationship between ITI outcome, clinical and treatment characteristics and cost of ITI treatment in haemophilia A patients. Data from 12 months before inhibitor diagnosis to 12 months after ITI completion were collected. Treatment cost was calculated in the third-party perspective and expressed as mean € per patient-month. Cox regression models were used to identify predictors of better outcome and the time taken to achieve tolerance. RESULTS: Seventy-one patients, aged 0.4-41 years (median: 3.8 years) at ITI start, were enrolled. Undetectable inhibitor was achieved in 84.5% of patients and inhibitor eradication with normal factor VIII (FVIII) pharmacokinetics in 74.2%. Median time to successful tolerance was 10.7 months (range 2.0-90.0 months). Peak inhibitor level on ITI was a significant predictor of ITI success. Breakthrough bleeding event incidence during ITI was associated with time to success. The mean cost of treatment for the time period between inhibitor diagnosis and ITI start was €3188 per patient-month (92.1% for bypassing agents), and €60 078 during ITI (76.8% for FVIII use in ITI). CONCLUSION: Immune tolerance induction in this patient cohort was successful in 84.5% of patients with a mean cost of €60 000 per patient-month. This high cost is dwarfed by comparison with the prospect of lifelong care of an inhibitor patient, in addition to gains in life expectancy and health-related quality of life.

Evaluation of safety and effectiveness of factor VIII treatment in haemophilia A patients with low titre inhibitors or a personal history of inhibitor. Patient Data Meta-analysis of rAFH-PFM Post-Authorization Safety Studies.

There is no prospective evidence on inhibitor recurrence among haemophilia A patients with low titre inhibitors or history of inhibitors, and whether or how therapeutic choices affect the risk of recurrence. The aims of this study were to synthesise safety data in patients with moderate-severe haemophilia A and with low titre inhibitors or inhibitor history enrolled in the rAHF PFM (ADVATE) - Post-Authorization Safety Studies (ADVATE-PASS) international programme. The study was conducted in clinics participating to the ADVATE PASS programme. The patient population consisted of patients entering the studies with low titre (≤ 5 BU) inhibitors or a positive personal history of inhibitors. Patients on Immune Tolerance Induction at study entry were excluded. Primary outcome was new or recurrent inhibitor titre > 5 BU. Secondary outcomes were any increase of inhibitor titre not reaching 5 BU; any unexplained change in treatment regimen. Primary analysis was done by two-stage random effects meta-analysis. Secondary analysis was done by a hierarchical Bayesian random effects logistic model. A total of 219 patients from seven studies were included. Of these 214 (97.7 %) patients had been previously treated for more than 50 exposure days. Two hundred ten patients had positive history for inhibitors, nine a baseline measurable titre. No patient presented a primary outcome event (95 % confidence interval [CI] 0-1.6 %). Six patients with previous history developed a low titre recurrence (overall rate 2.2, 95 %CI 0-4.8 %). When any increase of inhibitor titre or any treatment change was accounted for, overall 3.7 % (95 % CI 0 %-8.0 %) of patients experienced the outcome. In conclusion, the observed rate of events does not support the definition of this population as at high risk for inhibitor development.

Cost analysis of prophylaxis with activated prothrombin complex concentrate vs. on-demand therapy with activated factor VII in severe haemophilia A patients with inhibitors, in Spain.

OBJECTIVE: A cost analysis model was developed to compare annual cost of prophylaxis with activated prothrombin complex concentrate (aPCC) vs. on-demand therapy with activated recombinant factor VII (rFVIIa) in severe haemophilia A patients with inhibitors for the Spanish National Health System (NHS). METHODS: Model inputs were drug cost for prophylaxis (aPCC) and for on-demand treatment (rFVIIa or aPCC); bleeding episodes management (excluding bypassing agent cost); surgical costs and disease management (excluding bleeding episodes). Annual bleeding episodes treated on-demand was assumed to be 25, whereas breakthrough bleeds on prophylaxis was 8. Dose for prophylaxis was 75.72 U kg(-1) , three times per week. The total on-demand dose/bleeding episode was 679.66 µg kg(-1) (rFVIIa) and 235.28 U kg(-1) (aPCC). The average bleeding cost (€2998) considered different bleeding sites (62.5% joints, 28.6% muscles and soft tissues, 3.6% mucocutaneous tissues and 5.4% other areas). A 7.5% deduction was applied to ex-factory drug prices. Unitary costs (€2013) derived from local databases. Sensitivity analyses (SA) were performed. RESULTS: Annual cost of aPCC prophylaxis (€524,358) was 16% lower than on-demand treatment with rFVIIa (€627,876). Yearly drug costs were €497,017 for aPCC (€73,166 for on-demand treatment and €423,850 for prophylaxis), and €548,870 for rFVIIa. Disease management cost (€2645 per year) and surgical procedures (€708 per year) were common for both strategies. In the SA prophylactic treatment led to savings between €26,225 and €-1,008,960. CONCLUSION: Prophylaxis with aPCC reduces number of bleeding episodes in severe haemophilia A patients with inhibitors. aPCC prophylaxis resulted in savings in excess of €100,000 per-patient per year, being 16% less costly than on-demand treatment with rFVIIa, for the Spanish NHS.

Factor VIII alloantibody inhibitors: cost analysis of immune tolerance induction vs. prophylaxis and on-demand with bypass treatment.

Development of inhibitors (alloantibodies to exogenous factor VIII) is the most significant treatment complication in patients with haemophilia A. The only proven way to eradicate inhibitors is through immune tolerance induction (ITI), while bypassing agents are typically employed to treat or prevent bleeds in patients with high titre inhibitors. Costs of these approaches have not been well studied. The aim of this study was to compare lifetime costs of treating patients with severe haemophilia A with inhibitors using on-demand or prophylaxis treatment with bypassing agents and ITI. A decision-analytic model was developed to compare the treatment costs and outcomes. Quantitation of the reduction in bleeding events for patients on prophylaxis and after eradication of inhibitors when on ITI and relapse of inhibitors was derived from published studies. Costs were obtained from standard US costing sources and are reported in 2014 US dollars. Costs and outcomes were discounted 3% per annum. Lifetime costs of treating patients with inhibitors are lower for ITI vs. on-demand or prophylaxis. Patients are also projected to live longer, have greater quality-adjusted life-years, and have fewer bleeding events than patients treated on-demand. Treating patients via ITI to eradicate inhibitors may result in lower lifetime costs and greater life-years and quality-adjusted life-years than treating with bypassing agents.