Constructing vascularized hepatic tissue by cell-assembled viscous tissue sedimentation method and its application for vascular toxicity assessment.

In vitro Construction of the liver sinusoidal structure using artificial tissue is an important but worthwhile challenge, particularly for assessing the risk of diseases such as sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS). Current models are unsuitable for evaluating the toxicity because of lacking sinusoidal capillary. In this study, we developed a vascularized hepatic tissue (VHT) using a unique tissue engineering technique, the cell assembled viscous tissue by sedimentation (CAViTs) method. The "viscous bodies" created using the CAViTs method exhibited significant self-assembly within 6 h after seeding, promoting cell-cell interaction. The level of albumin secreted by the VHT was four times higher than that of 2D-coculture and maintained for 1 month. The gene expression pattern of the VHT was closer to that of total human liver, compared with the 2D system. Quantitative evaluations of the vascular structure of VHT treated with two typical SOS-inducing compounds, monocrotaline and retrorsine, revealed higher sensitivity (IC50 = 40.35 µM), 19.92 times higher than the cell-viability assay. Thus, VHT represents an innovative in vitro model that mimics the vessel network structure and could become a useful tool for the early screening of compounds associated with a risk of vascular toxicity. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Mimicking sinusoidal structures in in vitro liver model is important to consider from the perspective of predicting hepatotoxicity such like sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS). However, it was difficult to reconstruct the vascular structure within the hepatocyte-rich environment. In this study, we constructed a vascularized hepatic tissue in a high-throughput manner by a unique method using collagen and heparin, and evaluated its applicability to toxicity assessment. Vessel morphology analysis of the model treated by monocrotaline, which is a well-known SOS-inducing compound, could predict the toxicity with higher sensitivity. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report to provide vascularized hepatic tissues using sinusoidal endothelial cells at least for demonstrating applicability to the evaluation of SOS induction risk.

Defibrotide: An Oligonucleotide for Sinusoidal Obstruction Syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: To review the efficacy and safety of defibrotide as well as its pharmacology, mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics (PK), drug-drug interactions, dosing, cost considerations, and place in therapy. DATA SOURCES: A PubMed search was performed through August 2017 using the terms defibrotide, oligonucleotide, hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD), sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS), and hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Other data sources were from references of identified studies, review articles, and conference abstracts plus manufacturer product labeling and website, the Food and Drug Administration website, and clinicaltrials.gov. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: English-language trials that examined defibrotide's pharmacodynamics, mechanism, PK, efficacy, safety, dosing, and cost-effectiveness were included. DATA SYNTHESIS: Trials have confirmed the safety and efficacy of defibrotide for treatment of VOD/SOS in adult and pediatric HCT patients, with complete response rates and day +100 overall survival rates ranging from 25.5% to 76% and 35% to 64%, respectively. The British Committee for Standards in Haematology/British Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Guidelines recommend defibrotide prophylaxis in pediatric and adult HCT patients with risk factors for VOD/SOS; however, its prophylactic use in the United States is controversial. Although there are efficacy data to support this strategy, cost-effectiveness data have not shown it to be cost-effective. Defibrotide has manageable toxicities, with low rates of grade 3 to 4 adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: Defibrotide is the first medication approved in the United States for the treatment of adults and children with hepatic VOD/SOS, with renal or pulmonary dysfunction following HCT. Data evaluating defibrotide for VOD/SOS prevention are conflicting and have not shown cost-effectiveness.

Chemotherapy-induced Sinusoidal Injury (CSI) score: a novel histologic assessment of chemotherapy-related hepatic sinusoidal injury in patients with colorectal liver metastasis.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative neoadjuvant therapy for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) is increasing in use and can lead to chemotherapy-induced damage to sinusoidal integrity, namely sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS). SOS has been associated with an increased need for intraoperative blood transfusions, increased length of hospitalization post-surgery, decreased tumor response, and a shorter overall survival after resection due to liver insufficiency. It is critical for clinicians and pathologists to be aware of this type of liver injury, and for pathologists to include the status of the background, non-neoplastic liver parenchyma in their pathology reports. In this study, expression of CD34 by sinusoidal endothelial cells (SECs), increased expression of smooth muscle actin (SMA) by hepatic stellate cells (HSCs), and aberrant expression of glutamine synthetase (GS) by noncentrizonal hepatocytes were semiquantitatively evaluated in liver resection or biopsy specimens from patients with CRLM to determine their diagnostic value for assessing chemotherapy-induced sinusoidal injury (CSI). METHODS: The expression of each marker was compared among 22 patients with CRLM with histologically evident SOS (SOS+) and 8 patients with CRLM who had not undergone chemotherapy. Each case was given a histologic grade using the sinusoidal obstruction syndrome index score (SOS-I) to assess the likelihood of SOS. Cases were also given an immunohistochemical grade using the total CSI score calculated as the sum of CD34, SMA, and GS scores. RESULTS: Abnormal staining patterns for CD34 and SMA were significantly more frequent and extensive in SOS+ cases than in the controls (81.8% vs. 25%, P < 0.01; 72.7% vs. 25%, P = 0.03). Aberrant GS expression in midzonal and periportal hepatocytes was only observed in SOS+ cases (31.8% vs. 0%), but this difference did not reach statistical significance. The CSI score was significantly higher in the SOS+ cases when compared to controls (P < 0.01), and was associated with a higher SOS histologic grade (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The CSI score, calculated using an immunohistochemical panel consisting of CD34, SMA, and GS, may serve as an objective marker of chemotherapy-induced sinusoidal injury and could help diagnose this peculiar form of liver injury.