Application of a 4-h human patch test method for comparative and investigative assessment of skin irritation.

A human 4-h patch test has recently been developed for testing the irritation hazard potential of chemicals. The original method was developed for comparative irritation assessments relative to benchmark irritants using simple statistical tests. In this context, the method has been shown to be robust in intralaboratory testing over time. Recent interlaboratory testing has also established the consistency of the method in assessment of the relative irritation potential of selected chemicals. These data help to position the method as a suitable replacement for animal test methods in assessment of skin irritation hazard. In addition, the method has great utility for investigating different parameters of clinical skin irritation. Using kinetic response patterns and curve fitting analysis, we have compared the relative irritation potential of chemicals in greater detail, using as a basis the time required for test subjects to respond as well as the incidence of positive responses. Also, using the response to 20% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) as a benchmark, we've been able to examine the intersubject variation in clinical skin irritation responses. In general, subjects most reactive to 20% SDS, in terms of the exposure time required to produce a positive response, were relatively more sensitive to a 2nd irritant chemical as well. However, this was not an absolute correlation in that some test subjects showed divergent patterns of response. The method was also used to compare directly the relative skin reactivity of different populations, based on race (Caucasian versus Asian) or on neurosensory skin sensitivity. Our results using this acute exposure test method indicate little difference in visually assessed skin irritation among these diverse human subpopulations.

Skin irritation testing in man for hazard assessment--evaluation of four patch systems.

1. The limitations of the Draize rabbit skin irritation test for hazard evaluation for man are widely documented. Nevertheless it remains the prescribed method for determining acute skin irritations hazard. 2. While the use of human testing for risk assessment of irritants is well established, the use of predictive testing in man for hazard identification has not been explored widely, and this is the object of the research programme. 3. The experiment described in this report evaluates the sensitivity of four patch testing systems (Finn chamber, Hill Top patch, Van der Bend chamber, and Webril patch) using a total of six irritant substances. 4. Following preliminary range-finding experiments, test materials were applied to the upper outer arm for up to 4 h. Assessments were performed immediately after patch removal and at 1, 24, 48, and 72 h. 5. Webril and Hill Top patches generated the greatest levels of response, although responses with Finn and Van der Bend were observed. Hill Top patches are recommended for future development work. 6. The use of very small preliminary panels to predict the effects in larger panels using different volunteers was only of limited value as each volunteer was found to have different irritant thresholds.

Measurement of skin-fold thickness in the guinea pig. Assessment of edema-inducing capacity of cutting fluids, acids, alkalis, formalin and dimethyl sulfoxide.

The rabbit has been used for decades for predictive testing of skin irritancy, but in recent years, the guinea pig has been suggested as an alternative, especially for assessment of one of the components of the irritant reaction: edema (fluid accumulation). A method based on skin-fold measurements with Harpenden calipers has been developed and modified. In previous papers, experience with sodium lauryl sulphate, nonanoic acid and industrial solvents was reported. The present results concern the use of cutting fluids, buffered and unbuffered acid and alkaline solutions, formalin and dimethyl sulfoxide. This inexpensive and comparatively unsophisticated method afforded clear dose-response relationships and good discriminating power. The only exception was the acid and alkaline solutions, where no changes in skin-fold thickness were observed despite their documented irritant potential. The appearance of erythema (visual scoring) and the increase in skin-fold thickness, and their relationship, are discussed with some illustrative examples. The method described is now well standardized and is suited for predictive testing of the edema-inducing capacity of chemicals and products.

Histological assessment of skin damage by irritants: its possible use in the evaluation of a 'barrier cream'.

The histological changes induced by topical application of selected irritants are reported. The possible application of this methodology to the evaluation of the protective value of a silicone-containing barrier cream is discussed. Although this crude method only allows objectivity of the later stages of a toxic reaction, it gives useful information about the potential protective effect of a silicone-containing barrier cream.