Influence of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Medical Management and on Healthcare Delivery of Immune-Mediated Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases during the First Pandemic Period February to July 2020: A Systematic Review.

(1) Background and Objectives: The COVID-19 pandemic influenced the management of patients with immune-mediated rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (imRMDs) in various ways. The goal of our systematic review was to determine the influence of the first period of the COVID-19 pandemic (February 2020 to July 2020) on the management of imRMDs regarding the availability of drugs, adherence to therapy and therapy changes and on healthcare delivery. (2) Materials and Methods: We conducted a systematic literature search of PubMed, Cochrane and Embase databases (carried out 20-26 October 2021), including studies with adult patients, on the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on the management of imRMDs. There were no restrictions regarding to study design except for systematic reviews and case reports that were excluded as well as articles on the disease outcomes in case of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Two reviewers screened the studies for inclusion, and in case of disagreement, a consensus was reached after discussion. (3) Results: A total of 5969 potentially relevant studies were found, and after title, abstract and full-text screening, 34 studies were included with data from 182,746 patients and 2018 rheumatologists. The non-availability of drugs (the impossibility or increased difficulty to obtain a drug), e.g., hydroxychloroquine and tocilizumab, was frequent (in 16-69% of patients). Further, medication non-adherence was reported among patients with different imRMDs and between different drugs in 4-46% of patients. Changes to preexisting medication were reported in up to 33% of patients (e.g., reducing the dose of steroids or the cessation of biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs). Physical in-office consultations and laboratory testing decreased, and therefore, newly implemented remote consultations (particularly telemedicine) increased greatly, with an increase of up to 80%. (4) Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic influenced the management of imRMDs, especially at the beginning. The influences were wide-ranging, affecting the availability of pharmacies, adherence to medication or medication changes, avoidance of doctor visits and laboratory testing. Remote and telehealth consultations were newly implemented. These new forms of healthcare delivery should be spread and implemented worldwide to routine clinical practice to be ready for future pandemics. Every healthcare service provider treating patients with imRMDs should check with his IT provider how these new forms of visits can be used and how they are offered in daily clinical practice. Therefore, this is not only a digitalization topic but also an organization theme for hospitals or outpatient clinics.

Interpreting hydroxychloroquine blood levels for medication non-adherence: a pharmacokinetic study.

OBJECTIVE: Characterise the relationship between hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) blood levels and the number of missed doses, accounting for dosage, dose timing and the large variability in pharmacokinetics (PK) between patients. METHODS: We externally validated a published PK model and then conducted dosing simulations. We developed a virtual population of 1000 patients for each dosage across a range of body weights and PK variability. Using the model, 10 Monte Carlo simulations for each patient were conducted to derive predicted whole blood concentrations every hour over 24 hours (240 000 HCQ levels at steady state). To determine the impact of missed doses on levels, we randomly deleted a fixed proportion of doses. RESULTS: For patients receiving HCQ 400 mg daily, simulated random blood levels <200 ng/mL were exceedingly uncommon in fully adherent patients (<0.1%). In comparison, with 80% of doses missed, approximately 60% of concentrations were <200 ng/mL. However, this cut-off was highly insensitive and would miss many instances of severe non-adherence. Average levels quickly dropped to <200 ng/mL after 2-4 days of missed doses. Additionally, mean levels decreased by 29.9% between peak and trough measurements. CONCLUSIONS: We propose an algorithm to optimally interpret HCQ blood levels and approximate the number of missed doses, incorporating the impact of dosage, dose timing and pharmacokinetic variability. No single cut-off has adequate combinations of both sensitivity and specificity, and cut-offs are dependent on the degree of targeted non-adherence. Future studies should measure trough concentrations to better identify target HCQ levels for non-adherence and efficacy.

Assessment of hydroxychloroquine blood levels in Sjögren's disease patients: drug adherence and clinical associations.

Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) has been used to treat Sjögren's disease (SjD) patients. However, there are no studies evaluating drug adherence through HCQ blood levels, pharmacy refill (PR) and medication adherence questionnaires. The relationship of HCQ blood levels with glandular/extraglandular disease parameters was also poorly assessed. This cross-sectional observational study included 74 adult SjD patients, who were receiving a stable HCQ dose (4-5.5 mg/kg/day, actual weight) for at least 3 months before study inclusion. HCQ blood levels were quantified by high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry. Adherence was assessed by PR and Medida de Adesão aos Tratamentos (MAT) questionnaire. The following parameters were evaluated: Xerostomia Inventory, Ocular Surface Disease Index, EULAR (European League Against Rheumatism) Sjögren's Syndrome Disease Activity Index, EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index, Schirmer's I test and non-stimulated/stimulated salivary flow rates. HCQ blood levels were 775.3(25.0-2,568.6)ng/mL. Eleven patients (14.9%) had HCQ blood levels < 200ng/mL (non-adherent group); 11(14.9%), 200-499ng/mL (sub-therapeutic levels group); and 52(70.2%), ≥ 500ng/mL (adherent group). PR classified incorrectly all non-adherent/sub-therapeutic patients and 2/52(3.9%) adherent patients. Using MAT, the overall misclassification was 24/52(46.2%) in the adherent group, and were correctly identified 9/11(81.8%) patients in non-adherent and 7/11(63.6%) in sub-therapeutic groups. MAT sensitivity and specificity to identify non-adherent/sub-therapeutic patients were 72.7% and 53.9%, respectively. The three groups were comparable regarding glandular/extraglandular disease parameters (p > 0.05). The assessment of HCQ blood levels is a promising tool for evaluating drug adherence in SjD. This is particularly crucial as one-third of patients exhibited non-adherence/sub-therapeutic levels, and neither PR nor MAT reliably identified these patients.

Hydroxychloroquine use is associated with reduced mortality risk in older adults with rheumatoid arthritis.

BACKGROUND: There is little robust data about the cardiovascular safety of hydroxychloroquine in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), who often have cardiovascular comorbidities. We examined the association between use of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in patients with RA and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). METHODS: In a retrospective cohort of Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥ 65 years with RA, we identified patients who initiated HCQ (users) and who did not initiate HCQ (non-users) between January 2015-June 2017. Each HCQ user was matched to 2 non-users of HCQ using propensity score derived from patient baseline characteristics. The primary outcome was the occurrence of MACE, defined as acute admissions for stroke, myocardial infarction, or heart failure. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality and the composite of MACE and all-cause mortality. Cox proportional hazards model was used to compare outcomes between HCQ users to non-users. RESULTS: The study included 2380 RA patients with incident HCQ use and matched 4633 HCQ non-users over the study period. The mean follow-up duration was 1.67 and 1.63 years in HCQ non-users and users, respectively. In multivariable models, use of HCQ was not associated with the risk of MACE (hazard ratio 1.1; 95% CI: 0.832-1.33). However, use of HCQ was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality (HR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.45-0.64) and the composite of all-cause mortality and MACE (HR 0.67; 95% CI: 0.58-0.78). CONCLUSION: HCQ use was independently associated with a lower risk of mortality in older adults with RA but not with incidence of MACE events. Key Points • Using an incident user design (to avoid the biases of a prevalent user design) and a population-based approach, we examined the effect of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) on the risk of major cardiovascular events (MACE) in older patients with RA. • We did not find an association between HCQ use and incident MACE. We did, however, find a significant association with the composite outcome (MACE and all-cause mortality) driven by a significant reduction in all-cause mortality with HCQ use.

The assessment of fetal cardiac functions in pregnancies with autoimmune diseases: a prospective case-control study.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the effect of the inflammatory process on fetal cardiac functions in pregnant women with autoimmune diseases (AID). METHODS: This prospective study included 36 pregnant women with diagnosed AID. Nineteen systemic lupus erythematosus, 12 antiphospholipid syndrome, 5 Sjögren's syndrome, and 72 healthy pregnancies were included. Fetal cardiac functions were evaluated with pulsed-wave, tissue Doppler, and M-mode echocardiography. RESULTS: Sociodemographic data were similar in both groups. Significant increases were found in tricuspid E (43.5 ± 0.9, p<0.001) and A (59.2 ± 2.2, p<0.001) and E/A (0.74 ± 0.03, p<0.001), E'/A' (0.64 ± 0.15, p<0.001), E/E' (6.5 ± 0.6, p<0.001), and left ventricular myocardial performance index (0.54 ± 0.03, p=0.005). We demonstrated a significant decrease in tricuspid E' (6.7 ± 0.6, p<0.001) and S' (6.9 ± 1, p<0.001) and in TAPSE (7.7 ± 0.5, p=0.002). We also found a significantly prolonged PR interval (130 ± 8, p<0.001). There was a significant increase in E' (6.8, p=0.033) and a significant decrease in E/E' ratio (6.4, p=0.027) in the group using hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) compared to non-users. CONCLUSIONS: We found that pregnancy with autoimmune diseases affects fetal heart functions. Additionally, hydroxychloroquine may positively affect the heart of AID fetuses. This information might be useful to clinicians in the follow-up of cardiovascular diseases.

Burden of disease and real-world treatment patterns of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus in the Australian OPAL dataset.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the demographics, disease burden and real-world management of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in Australian community practice. METHODS: Patients with a physician diagnosis of SLE and at least 1 visit between 1 January 2009 and 31 March 2021 were identified in the OPAL dataset, an aggregated collection of data extracted from the electronic medical records of patients managed by 112 Australian rheumatologists. Demographics, basic clinical features and prescribed medications were described, with medication combinations used as a surrogate of disease severity. RESULTS: Of 5133 patients with a diagnosis of lupus, 4260 (83%) had SLE. Of these SLE patients, almost 90% of patients were female, with a median age of 49 years [IQR 37-61] at first-recorded visit. Of the 2285 SLE patients whose most recent visit was between 1 January 2019 and 31 March 2021, 52.5% had mild disease, 29.9% had moderate-severe disease and 7.4% had very severe disease. Visit frequency increased with disease severity. Most patients (85.8%) were treated with hydroxychloroquine, typically prescribed as first line-of-therapy. CONCLUSION: In this large real-world Australian cohort of patients with SLE, a substantial burden of disease was identified, with a significant proportion (almost one-third of patients) considered to have moderate to severe disease based on medication use. This study provides a greater understanding of the path from symptom onset to treatment and the heterogeneous presentation of patients with SLE who are treated in community practice in Australia. Key messages • Most published studies describing patients with SLE are derived from specialist lupus centres, typically in the hospital setting, therefore little is known about the characteristics of patients with SLE who are receiving routine care in community clinics. • The OPAL dataset is a large collection of clinical data from the electronic medical records of rheumatologists predominantly practising in private community clinics, which is where the majority (73-80%) of adult rheumatology services are conducted in Australia [1-3] . Since data from community care has not been widely available for SLE research, this study contributes important insight into this large and under-reported patient population. • To improve access to care and effective treatments, and reduce the burden of SLE in Australia, a greater understanding of the characteristics and unmet needs of patients with SLE managed in the community setting is required.

Characterization of adverse events to hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, azithromycin and tocilizumab in patients hospitalized due to COVID-19 in a Peruvian Social Health Insurance hospital. / Caracterización de los eventos adversos a hidroxicloroquina, ivermectina, azitromicina y tocilizumab en pacientes hospitalizados por la COVID-19 en un hospital del Seguro Social de Salud del Perú.

OBJECTIVE.: To characterize the adverse events (AEs) related to the off-label use of hydroxychloroquine (HQ), azithromycin (AZI), tocilizumab (TOB) and ivermectin (IVM) for the treatment of COVID-19 in hospitalized patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS.: We conducted a secondary cross-sectional analysis of the Peruvian Social Health Insurance (EsSalud) pharmacovigilance system database of AE notifications to HQ, AZI, TOB and IVM in the Edgardo Rebagliati Martins National Hospital from April to October 2020. Information was collected from digital medical records. We estimated AE reporting rates and evaluated their characteristics by drug type, time of occurrence, type by the affected organ-system, severity and causality. RESULTS.: We identified 154 notifications describing a total of 183 AE possibly related to HQ, AZI, TOB and IVM; the reporting rate was 8%. The median time of AE occurrence was 3 days (IQR: 2-5). Most were cardiovascular events; prolongation of the QT interval was the most frequent. Hepatobiliary AEs were mainly associated with TOB. Most cases were moderate, however, 10.4% were severe. CONCLUSIONS.: We found AEs potentially associated with the use of HQ, AZI, TOB and IVM against COVID-19; cardiovascular events were the most frequent. Although AZI, HQ and IVM have known safety profiles, their use against COVID-19 could increase the occurrence of AE due to the risk factors inherent to this infection. Surveillance systems must be improved, especially those for TOB.

OBJETIVOS.: Caracterizar los eventos adversos (EA) asociados a hidroxicloroquina (HQ), azitromicina (AZI), tocilizumab (TOB) e ivermectina (IVM) prescritos como «fuera de etiqueta¼ en el tratamiento de pacientes hospitalizados por la COVID-19. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS.: Se realizó un análisis secundario transversal de la base de datos del sistema de farmacovigilancia del Seguro Social de Salud del Perú (EsSalud) de las notificaciones de EA a HQ, AZI, TOB e IVM provenientes del Hospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati Martins de abril a octubre del 2020. Se revisaron las historias clínicas digitales, se estimaron las tasas de reporte de EA y se evaluaron sus características por tipo de fármaco, tiempo de aparición, tipo por órgano-sistema afectado, gravedad y causalidad. RESULTADOS.: Se identificaron 154 notificaciones que describen un total de 183 EA posiblemente relacionados con HQ, AZI, TOB e IVM, siendo 8% la tasa de reporte de EA. La mediana de tiempo de aparición de EA fue de 3 días (RIC: 2-5). La mayoría fueron cardiovasculares, destacándose la prolongación del intervalo QT. Se observaron EA hepatobiliares principalmente asociados a TOB. La mayoría de los casos fueron moderados, no obstante, el 10,4% fue grave. CONCLUSIONES.: Se identificaron EA potencialmente asociados al uso de HQ, AZI, TOB e IVM contra la COVID-19, siendo los más frecuentes los de tipo cardiovasculares. A pesar de que la AZI, HQ e IVM poseen perfiles conocidos de seguridad, su empleo en la COVID-19 podría incrementar la aparición de EA por los factores de riesgo propios de esta infección. Se sugiere reforzar la vigilancia, especialmente, de TOB.

Cardiovascular Risks of Hydroxychloroquine vs Methotrexate in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis.

BACKGROUND: Hydroxychloroquine is often used as a first-line treatment of rheumatoid arthritis despite limited evidence on its cardiovascular risk. OBJECTIVES: We conducted a cardiovascular safety evaluation comparing hydroxychloroquine to methotrexate among patients with rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: Using Medicare data (2008-2016), we identified 54,462 propensity score-matched patients with rheumatoid arthritis, aged ≥65 years, who initiated hydroxychloroquine or methotrexate. Primary outcomes were sudden cardiac arrest or ventricular arrythmia (SCA/VA) and major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE). Secondary outcomes were cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, and hospitalized heart failure (HF). We also examined treatment effect modification by history of HF. RESULTS: Hydroxychloroquine was not associated with risk of SCA/VA (HR: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.79-1.35) or MACE (HR: 1.07; 95% CI: 0.97-1.18) compared with methotrexate. In patients with history of HF, hydroxychloroquine initiators had a higher risk of MACE (HR: 1.30; 95% CI: 1.08-1.56), cardiovascular mortality (HR: 1.34; 95% CI: 1.06-1.70), all-cause mortality (HR: 1.22; 95% CI: 1.04-1.43), myocardial infarction (HR: 1.74; 95% CI: 1.25-2.42), and hospitalized HF (HR: 1.29; 95% CI: 1.07-1.54) compared to methotrexate initiators. Cardiovascular risks were not different in patients without history of HF except for an increased hospitalized HF risk (HR: 1.57; 95% CI: 1.30-1.90) among hydroxychloroquine initiators. CONCLUSIONS: In older patients with rheumatoid arthritis, hydroxychloroquine and methotrexate showed similar SCA/VA and MACE risks; however, hydroxychloroquine initiators with history of HF had higher risks of MACE, cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, and myocardial infarction. An increased hospitalized HF risk was observed among hydroxychloroquine initiators regardless of an HF history.

Emerging Therapies for COVID-19: The Value of Information From More Clinical Trials.

OBJECTIVES: The COVID-19 pandemic necessitates time-sensitive policy and implementation decisions regarding new therapies in the face of uncertainty. This study aimed to quantify consequences of approving therapies or pursuing further research: immediate approval, use only in research, approval with research (eg, emergency use authorization), or reject. METHODS: Using a cohort state-transition model for hospitalized patients with COVID-19, we estimated quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and costs associated with the following interventions: hydroxychloroquine, remdesivir, casirivimab-imdevimab, dexamethasone, baricitinib-remdesivir, tocilizumab, lopinavir-ritonavir, interferon beta-1a, and usual care. We used the model outcomes to conduct cost-effectiveness and value of information analyses from a US healthcare perspective and a lifetime horizon. RESULTS: Assuming a $100 000-per-QALY willingness-to-pay threshold, only remdesivir, casirivimab-imdevimab, dexamethasone, baricitinib-remdesivir, and tocilizumab were (cost-) effective (incremental net health benefit 0.252, 0.164, 0.545, 0.668, and 0.524 QALYs and incremental net monetary benefit $25 249, $16 375, $54 526, $66 826, and $52 378). Our value of information analyses suggest that most value can be obtained if these 5 therapies are approved for immediate use rather than requiring additional randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (net value $20.6 billion, $13.4 billion, $7.4 billion, $54.6 billion, and $7.1 billion), hydroxychloroquine (net value $198 million) is only used in further RCTs if seeking to demonstrate decremental cost-effectiveness and otherwise rejected, and interferon beta-1a and lopinavir-ritonavir are rejected (ie, neither approved nor additional RCTs). CONCLUSIONS: Estimating the real-time value of collecting additional evidence during the pandemic can inform policy makers and clinicians about the optimal moment to implement therapies and whether to perform further research.

Effect of common maintenance drugs on the risk and severity of COVID-19 in elderly patients.

BACKGROUND: Maintenance drugs are used to treat chronic conditions. Several classes of maintenance drugs have attracted attention because of their potential to affect susceptibility to and severity of COVID-19. METHODS: Using claims data on 20% random sample of Part D Medicare enrollees from April to December 2020, we identified patients diagnosed with COVID-19. Using a nested case-control design, non-COVID-19 controls were identified by 1:5 matching on age, race, sex, dual-eligibility status, and geographical region. We identified usage of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI), angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARB), statins, warfarin, direct factor Xa inhibitors, P2Y12 inhibitors, famotidine and hydroxychloroquine based on Medicare prescription claims data. Using extended Cox regression models with time-varying propensity score adjustment we examined the independent effect of each study drug on contracting COVID-19. For severity of COVID-19, we performed extended Cox regressions on all COVID-19 patients, using COVID-19-related hospitalization and all-cause mortality as outcomes. Covariates included gender, age, race, geographic region, low-income indicator, and co-morbidities. To compensate for indication bias related to the use of hydroxychloroquine for the prophylaxis or treatment of COVID-19, we censored patients who only started on hydroxychloroquine in 2020. RESULTS: Up to December 2020, our sample contained 374,229 Medicare patients over 65 who were diagnosed with COVID-19. Among the COVID-19 patients, 278,912 (74.6%) were on at least one study drug. The three most common study drugs among COVID-19 patients were statins 187,374 (50.1%), ACEI 97,843 (26.2%) and ARB 83,290 (22.3%). For all three outcomes (diagnosis, hospitalization and death), current users of ACEI, ARB, statins, warfarin, direct factor Xa inhibitors and P2Y12 inhibitors were associated with reduced risks, compared to never users. Famotidine did not show consistent significant effects. Hydroxychloroquine did not show significant effects after censoring of recent starters. CONCLUSION: Maintenance use of ACEI, ARB, warfarin, statins, direct factor Xa inhibitors and P2Y12 inhibitors was associated with reduction in risk of acquiring COVID-19 and dying from it.

Assessment of Recovery Time, Worsening, and Death among Inpatients and Outpatients with COVID-19, Treated with Hydroxychloroquine or Chloroquine plus Azithromycin Combination in Burkina Faso.

OBJECTIVES: Our study aimed to assess the statistical relationship between the use of chloroquine phosphate or hydroxychloroquine plus azithromycin (CQ/HCQ + AZ) and virological recovery, disease worsening, and death among out- and inpatients with COVID-19 in Burkina Faso. METHODS AND DESIGNS: This was a retrospective observational study that compared outcomes in terms of time to recovery, worsening, and death in patients who received CQ/HCQ + AZ and those who did not using a multivariable Cox or Poisson model before and after propensity matching. RESULTS: Of the 863 patients included in the study, about 50% (432/863) were home-based follow-up patients and 50% were inpatients. Of these, 83.3% (746/863) received at least 1 dose of CQ/HCQ + AZ and 13.7% (118/863) did not. There were no significant differences in associated time to recovery for patients receiving any CQ/HCQ + AZ (adjusted HR 1.44; 95% CI 0.76-2.71). Similarly, there was no significant association between CQ/HCQ + AZ use and worsening (adjusted IRR 0.80; 95% CI 0.50-1.50). However, compared with the untreated group, the treated group had a lower risk of death (adjusted HR 0.20; 95% CI 0.10-0.44). CONCLUSIONS: The study provided valuable additional information on the use of CQ/HCQ in patients with COVID-19 and did not show any harmful outcomes of CQ/HCQ + AZ treatment.

Predictors of Initial Hydroxychloroquine Receipt Among Medicaid Beneficiaries With Incident Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

OBJECTIVE: Although hydroxychloroquine/chloroquine (HCQ/CQ) form the cornerstone of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) treatment, not all patients receive this, which may contribute to disparities in outcomes. The present study was undertaken to investigate factors associated with first dispensing of HCQ/CQ. METHODS: Using Medicaid insurance claims from 2000 to 2010, we identified individuals ages 18-65 years with incident SLE (≥3 SLE International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes separated by ≥30 days without prior SLE codes or HCQ/CQ use for 24 months). The primary outcome was first dispensing of HCQ/CQ within 24 months of the first SLE code. We used Cox proportional hazards regression models to examine the association between sociodemographic factors, comorbidities, health care utilization, and medication use and HCQ/CQ dispensing within 24 months of diagnosis. RESULTS: We identified 9,560 Medicaid beneficiaries with incident SLE; 41% received HCQ (n = 3,949) or CQ (n = 14) within 24 months of diagnosis. Younger patients were more likely to receive HCQ/CQ. Black, Asian, Hispanic, and American Indian/Alaska Native individuals were more likely to receive HCQ/CQ than White individuals. Alcohol and nicotine use, chronic pain, diabetes mellitus, and end-stage renal disease were associated with lower dispensing. Appointments and preventive care services were associated with higher rates, and more hospitalizations with lower rates. CONCLUSION: Only 41% of Medicaid beneficiaries with SLE received HCQ/CQ within 24 months of diagnosis. Greater outpatient and preventive care increased receipt. All non-White race/ethnicities had higher rates of first dispensing. Time to initial HCQ/CQ dispensing may not explain racial/ethnic disparities in adverse outcomes, highlighting the need to consider other care quality-related issues and medication adherence challenges.

Prescribing Patterns of Hydroxychloroquine and Glucocorticoids Among Lupus Patients After New-Onset End-Stage Renal Disease.

OBJECTIVE: Optimal strategies for managing lupus medications after end-stage renal disease (ESRD) have not been addressed. The objective was to identify the current US-wide prescribing patterns of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and oral glucocorticoids (GS) among systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients with incident ESRD enrolled in the US Renal Data System (USRDS) registry. METHODS: We identified incident ESRD patients age ≥18 years with SLE as a primary cause of ESRD between January 2006 and June 2013. Patients who were started on dialysis at ESRD onset and enrolled in Medicare Part D within 93 days as required by Medicare were included. RESULTS: Among the 2,654 new-onset ESRD patients with Part D, the median duration of follow-up was 761 days (interquartile range [IQR] 374-1,375). At baseline, 1,076 patients (41%) were not receiving HCQ or GS, 220 (8%) were prescribed HCQ alone, 509 (19%) were prescribed both HCQ and GS, and 849 (32%) were prescribed GS alone. Of the 1,983 patients who either never received or discontinued HCQ after ESRD onset, 667 (34%) continued GS to the end of the follow-up period. The median GS dose was lower for patients taking HCQ (14 mg [IQR 9-21]) compared to patients who were never prescribed HCQ (15 mg [IQR 9-27]) or patients who discontinued HCQ after ESRD (17 mg [IQR 10-27]; P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Approximately one-third of patients with lupus nephritis and new-onset ESRD received GS monotherapy at high doses. As GS-related complications contribute to hospitalizations and deaths in SLE ESRD, changing these prescribing practices may improve morbidity and mortality outcomes.

Outpatient prescription patterns of COVID-19 drugs in the metropolitan area of Mexico City.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to describe the use of drugs with apparent efficacy in ambulatory patients with confirmed COVID-19 and the relationship of Google Trends searches with prescriptions and the total number of COVID-19 cases in Mexico City. METHODS: Between March 2020 and February 2021, we surveyed 350 patients confirmed to have COVID-19 across 3 hospitals in Mexico City for their ambulatory prescriptions. We analysed the correlation between prescription patterns of 4 drugs with apparent efficacy against COVID-19, Google Trends searches for these drugs, and the overall number of confirmed COVID-19 cases in Mexico City. RESULTS: We included 350 patients, of whom 59% were women with a median age of 38 years (interquartile range, 29-51), and 72% had a bachelor's degree or higher. There were ambulatory medical prescriptions in 172 (49%) patients, and self-prescriptions were reported in 99 (28%) patients. The prescription rate was high for hydroxychloroquine/azithromycin (19%) and dexamethasone (25%). There was a decrease in the prescription of hydroxychloroquine (P < 0.001) and a strong positive correlation between hydroxychloroquine (r = 0.66; 95% confidence interval, 0.11-0.90; P = 0.02) prescription and online searches for hydroxychloroquine. There was a strong positive correlation between online searches for azithromycin, dexamethasone, ivermectin, and vitamin D and the number of confirmed COVID-19 cases. CONCLUSIONS: During the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a high proportion of prescriptions for hydroxychloroquine/azithromycin and dexamethasone despite their unproven efficacy. Analysis of Google Trends showed a strong correlation between the overall number of confirmed COVID-19 cases and searches for such drugs, suggesting a higher rate of prescriptions. Analysis of online searches could thus help to actively survey public health behaviours in the future.

Acesso da população a medicamentos durante a pandemia do novo coronavírus / Access of the population to medicines during the pandemic of the new coronavirus / Acceso de la poblacióna medicamentos durante la pandemia del nuevo coronavirus

Introdução:Em 2020 a Organização Mundial da Saúde declarou a pandemia do novo coronavírus. Diante desse cenário vários estudos começaram a ser realizados em busca de uma terapia eficaz para o manejo clínico dos pacientes. A Cloroquina e a Hidroxicloroquina foram os primeiros medicamentos testados. A divulgação dos resultados iniciais fez aumentar a procura desses medicamentos em farmácias e drogarias. Objetivo:Avaliar o acesso da população a medicamentos na pandemia e o uso das "promessas terapêuticas":Cloroquina, Hidroxicloroquina e Ivermectina para prevenção e tratamento da COVID-19. Metodologia:Trata-se de um estudo descritivo exploratório de abordagem quantitativa, não probabilístico e por conveniência. A coleta de dados foi realizada online,via Google Formulários. Participaram 1.754 pessoas, resultando em 1.748 questionários válidos. A amostra foi distribuída em 3 grupos, de acordo com a pergunta de nº 11 do formulário de pesquisa: "Você já teve COVID-19?". Resultados:Dos 1.748 respondentes, 200 (11,4%) pertenciam ao grupo que "teve COVID-19", 1.041 (59,6%) ao grupo que não teve a doença, e 507 (29%) responderam não saber se foram infectados. No que diz respeito ao acesso a medicamentos na pandemia, 55,2% do total da amostra relatou não ter sido afetado, e 29% disseram ter tido o acesso afetado de alguma forma. Em relação ao uso das "promessas terapêuticas", 61% dos respondentes disse não ter feito uso com finalidade de prevenção, e sim para tratamento, já 52,6% da população do estudo disse que não fez uso de jeito nenhum, e 46,2% relatou que fez uso dos medicamentos mencionados para tratar a COVID-19. Conclusões:Constatou-se que a explosão na busca por medicamentos durante a pandemia não afetou o acesso da população. Além disso, a Cloroquina e a Hidroxicloroquina, não foram amplamente utilizadas para prevenção da doença (AU).

Introduction:In 2020the World Health Organization declared the new coronavirus pandemic. In view of this scenario, several studies began to be carried out in search of an effective therapy for the clinical management of patients. The release of initial results has increased demand for Chloroquine and Hydroxychloroquine in pharmacies and drugstores. Objective: To assess the population's access to medicines in the pandemic and the use of "therapeutic promises": Chloroquine, Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19. Methodology:Exploratory descriptive study with a quantitative approach, non-probabilistic and for convenience. Data collection was performed online, via Google Forms. 1,754 people participated, resulting in 1,748 valid questionnaires. The sample was divided into 3 groups, according to question #11 of the survey form: "Have you ever had COVID-19?". Results:Of the 1,748 respondents, 200 (11.4%) belonged to the group that "had COVID-19", 1,041 (59.6%) to the group that did not have the disease, and 507 (29%) answered not knowing if they were infected. With regard to access to medicines in the pandemic, 55.2% of the total sample reported not being affected, and 29% said their access was affected in some way. Regarding the use of "therapeutic promises", 61% of respondents said they did not use it for prevention purposes, but for treatment, while 52.6% of the study population said they did not use it at all, and 46, 2% used the medications mentioned to treat COVID-19. Conclusions:It wasfound that the explosion in the search for medicines during the pandemic did not affect the population's access. Furthermore, Chloroquine and Hydroxychloroquine have not been widely used for disease prevention (AU).

Introducción:En 2020, la Organización Mundial de la Salud declaró la nueva pandemia de coronavirus. Ante este escenario, se comenzaron a realizar varios estudios en busca de una terapia eficaz para el manejo clínico de lospacientes. La publicación de los resultados iniciales ha aumentado la demanda de cloroquina e hidroxicloroquina en farmacias y droguerías. Objetivo:Evaluar el acceso de la población a medicamentos en la pandemia y el uso de "promesas terapéuticas": cloroquina, hidroxicloroquina e ivermectina para la prevención y tratamiento de COVID-19. Metodología:Se trata de un estudio descriptivo exploratorio con enfoque cuantitativo, no probabilístico y por conveniencia. La recopilación de datos se realizó en línea, a través de Google Forms. Participaron 1.754 personas, resultando 1.748 cuestionarios válidos. La muestra se dividió en 3 grupos, de acuerdo con la pregunta # 11 del formulario de la encuesta: "¿Alguna vez ha tenido COVID-19?". Resultados: De los 1.748 encuestados, 200 (11,4%) pertenecían al grupo que "tenía COVID-19", 1.041 (59,6%) al grupo que no tenía la enfermedad y 507 (29%) respondieron sin saber si estaban infectados. Con respecto al acceso a medicamentos en la pandemia, el 55,2% del total de la muestra informó no estar afectado y el 29% dijo que su acceso se vio afectado de alguna manera. Con respecto al uso de "promesas terapéuticas", el 61% de los encuestados dijo que no lo usaba con fines de prevención, sino de tratamiento, mientras que el 52,6% de la población del estudio dijo que no lo usaba en absoluto, y el 46,2% informó que utilizaron los medicamentos mencionados para tratar COVID-19. Conclusiones: Se encontró que la explosión en la búsqueda de medicamentos durante la pandemia no afectó el acceso de la población. Además, la cloroquina y la hidroxicloroquina no se han utilizado ampliamente para la prevención de enfermedades (AU).

Cost-effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine versus placebo for hand osteoarthritis: economic evaluation of the HERO trial.

Background: An economic evaluation alongside the Hydroxychloroquine Effectiveness in Reducing symptoms of hand Osteoarthritis (HERO) trial was undertaken to assess the cost-effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine compared with placebo for symptomatic treatment of hand osteoarthritis for patients with at least moderate hand pain and inadequate response to current therapies. Methods: A trial-based cost-utility analysis was undertaken from the perspective of the UK National Health Service and Personal Social Services over a 12-month time horizon, using evidence from 248 participants included in the HERO trial, conducted in England. Patient-level data were collected prospectively over a 12-month period, using participant-completed questionnaires and investigator forms, to collect healthcare utilisation, costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) using the EQ-5D-5L. The base-case analysis was conducted on an intention-to-treat basis and used multiple imputation methods to deal with missing data. Results were presented in terms of incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (incremental cost per QALY) and net health benefit, with uncertainty surrounding the findings explored using cost-effectiveness acceptability curves. Results: The base-case analysis estimated slightly lower costs on average (-£11.80; 95% confidence interval (CI) -£15.60 to -£8.00) and marginally fewer QALYs (-0.0052; 95% CI -0.0057 to -0.0047) for participants in the hydroxychloroquine group versus placebo group at 12 months. The resulting incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £2,267 per QALY lost indicated that although costs were saved, health-related quality of life was lost. Even assuming symmetrical preferences regarding losses and gains for health benefits, the findings do not fall within the cost-effective region. Similar findings arose for analyses conducted from the societal perspective and using complete cases only. Conclusions: This economic evaluation indicates that hydroxychloroquine is unlikely to provide a cost-effective pain relief option for improving health-related quality of life in adult patients with moderate-to-severe hand osteoarthritis.

Guía de práctica clínica para el tratamiento farmacológico de nefritis lúpica / Clinical practice guideline for the pharmacological treatment of lupus nephritis

La nefritis lúpica (NL) es un tipo de glomerulonefritis que se desarrolla como consecuencia del lupus eritematoso sistémico (LES), una enfermedad autoinmune sistémica de presentación clínica variable (1, 2). La NL se clasifica histológicamente en seis clases(I-VI) (3), las cuales poseen diferentes manifestaciones clínicas y expresan diferentes grados de gravedad del daño renal (1). En este documento no se abordará a pacientes con clase VI pues solo son tributarios a terapia de reemplazo renal. La NL se presenta aproximadamente en el 50 a 60% de las personas con LES, en quienes es una de las principales causas de morbimortalidad puesto que progresa a falla renal o muerte (1, 2). En suma, la prevalencia, gravedad y mortalidad de la NL son mayores en hispanos, afroamericanos, y asiáticos (4). El tratamiento farmacológico de la NL consta de las fases de inducción y mantenimiento (1). Entre los fármacos principalmente utilizados durante estas fases, se encuentran los antimaláricos, glucocorticoides (GC), inmunosupresores como micofenolato mofetilo (MMF) y ciclofosfamida (CYC) endovenosa, entre otros (1, 2). Sin embargo, la incidencia de respuesta renal completa suele ser baja (~20 a 30%) (1, 5, 6), y tanto las recaídas como los eventos adversos pueden ser frecuentes con estas terapias (1). Por ello, actualmente se ha propuesto el uso de diferentes dosis de dichos fármacos y otros inmunosupresores ya sea solos o en combinación. La evaluación de los beneficios y daños de estos fármacos permitirá conocer cuáles son las opciones más eficaces y seguras que logren inducir la remisión de la enfermedad, prevenir las recaídas, prevenir la progresión a falla renal y disminuir la mortalidad de los adultos con diagnóstico reciente de NL. Por ello, el Seguro Social de Salud (EsSalud) priorizó la realización de la presente guía de práctica clínica (GPC) para establecer lineamientos basados en evidencia con el fin de gestionar de la mejor manera los procesos y procedimientos asistenciales de la presente condición. Esta GPC fue realizada por la Dirección de Guías de Práctica Clínica, Farmacovigilancia y Tecnovigilancia del Instituto de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud e Investigación (IETSI) de EsSalud.