Cost-effectiveness of sodium zirconium cyclosilicate for advanced chronic kidney patients in Singapore.

INTRODUCTION: Hyperkalaemia (HK) is prevalent among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and chronic heart failure, especially if they are treated with renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASi). This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of a newly developed anti-HK therapy, sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC), to the current standard of care for treating HK in advanced CKD patients from the Singapore health system perspective. METHODS: We adapted a global microsimulation model to simulate individual patients' potassium level trajectories with baseline potassium ≥5.5 mmol/L, CKD progression, changes in treatment, and other fatal and non-fatal events. Effectiveness data was derived from ZS-004 and ZS-005 trials. Model parameters were localised using CKD patients' administrative and medical records at the Singapore General Hospital Department of Renal Medicine. We estimated the lifetime cost and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of each HK treatment, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of SZC. RESULTS: SZC demonstrated cost-effectiveness with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratsio of SGD 45 068 per QALY over a lifetime horizon, below the willingness-to-pay threshold of SGD 90 000 per QALY. Notably, SZC proved most cost-effective for patients with less severe CKD who were concurrently using RAASi. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the findings, accounting for alternative parameter values and statistical uncertainty. CONCLUSION: This study establishes the cost-effectiveness of SZC as a treatment for HK, highlighting its potential to mitigate the risk of hyperkalaemia and optimise RAASi therapy. These findings emphasise the value of integrating SZC into the Singapore health system for improved patient outcomes and resource allocation.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of sodium zirconium cyclosilicate for hyperkalemia among patients with chronic kidney disease or heart failure in Kuwait.

INTRODUCTION: Our model was conducted from Kuwaiti payer's perspective to provide evidence on the cost-effectiveness of Sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC) versus patiromer to correct and maintain serum potassium (K+) in combination with renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASis) with different dose titration in patients with chronic kidney disease/heart failure (CKD/HF) with/without renal replacement therapy (RRT). METHODOLOGY: The model was developed as a patient-level, fixed-time increment stochastic simulation to simulate the complexity of disease, including multiple coexisting and competing conditional risks. This model was established to compare SZC versus patiromer as a treatment for hyperkalemia (HK) among adult populations with underlying conditions of advanced CKD stages 3a-5 or HF to correct and maintain serum K + over a lifetime horizon. The clinical outcomes of SZC and patiromer were demonstrated through arm-specific K + trajectories extracted from the HARMONIZE trial and OPAL-HK trial, respectively. The utility data was captured from different studies. Direct medical cost was captured from local data from Kuwaiti hospitals. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the uncertainty in the model. RESULTS: Within different scenarios of CKD/HF, SZC was a cost-saving option, with/without RRT, whether one-off administration or repeated administration, except for one-off treatment administration among the HF cohort, which generated an incremental cost effectiveness ratio of KWD 331/quality adjusted life year (QALY). The incremental QALY of SZC ranged from 0.007 to 0.202. In addition, the savings observed with SZC fall within a range of KWD -60 to KWD -1,235 at serum K+ ≥ 5.1 mmol/L. CONCLUSION: The evidence generated by our model recommends the inclusion of SZC as a treatment option to correct HK and maintain normal serum K + level for CKD/HF patients within the Kuwaiti healthcare system. The costs saved from reducing frequent HK episodes, RAASis discontinuation/down titration, major cardiovascular events, and hospitalization offset the drug acquisition cost of SZC.

A population-based cohort defined risk of hyperkalemia after initiating SGLT-2 inhibitors, GLP1 receptor agonists or DPP-4 inhibitors to patients with chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes.

Hyperkalemia is a common adverse event in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and type 2 diabetes and limits the use of guideline-recommended therapies such as renin-angiotensin system inhibitors. Here, we evaluated the comparative effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i), glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) on the risk of hyperkalemia. We conducted a population-based active-comparator, new-user cohort study using claims data from Medicare and two large United States commercial insurance databases (April 2013-April 2022). People with CKD stages 3-4 and type 2 diabetes who newly initiated SGLT-2i vs. DPP-4i (141671 patients), GLP-1RA vs. DPP-4i (159545 patients) and SGLT-2i vs. GLP-1RA (93033 patients) were included. The primary outcome was hyperkalemia diagnosed in inpatient or outpatient settings. Secondary outcomes included hyperkalemia diagnosed in inpatient or emergency department setting, and serum potassium levels of 5.5 mmol/L or more. Pooled hazard ratios and rate differences were estimated after propensity score matching to adjust for over 140 potential confounders. Initiation of SGLT-2i was associated with a lower risk of hyperkalemia compared with DPP-4i (hazard ratio 0.74; 95% confidence interval 0.68-0.80) and contrasted to GLP-1RA (0.92; 0.86-0.99). Compared with DPP-4i, GLP-1RA were also associated with a lower risk of hyperkalemia (0.80; 0.75-0.86). Corresponding absolute rate differences/1000 person-years were -24.8 (95% confidence interval -31.8 to -17.7), -5.0 (-10.9 to 0.8), and -17.7 (-23.4 to -12.1), respectively. Similar findings were observed for the secondary outcomes, among subgroups, and across single agents within the SGLT-2i and GLP-1RA classes. Thus, SGLT-2i and GLP-1RA are associated with a lower risk of hyperkalemia than DPP-4i in patients with CKD and type 2 diabetes, further supporting the use of these drugs in this population.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of sodium zirconium cyclosilicate for treating hyperkalemia among Chinese patients.

Objectives: Hyperkalemia most commonly develops in chronic kidney disease (CKD) or heart failure (HF) patients. Sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC) is a new selective potassium (K+) binder for treating hyperkalemia. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of SZC vs. usual care for the treatment of hyperkalemia among CKD patients or HF patients in China. Methods: Individual patient microsimulation models were constructed to simulate a CKD cohort until the initiation of renal replacement therapy (RRT) and a HF cohort across the lifetime horizon. K+ levels were based on two phase 3 clinical trials. Health state utility and event incidence rates were retrieved from literature. Drug costs and healthcare utilization costs were obtained from negotiated price, literature, and expert interviews. Costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were both discounted at 5%. The main outcomes were overall costs, QALYs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). The willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold in China is CNY 80,976-242,928/QALY, which is one to three times the gross domestic product per capita. Sensitivity analyses were performed to characterize the models' uncertainty. Results: In the HF cohort, the base case results revealed that SZC was associated with 2.86 QALYs and the total cost was CNY 92671.58; usual care was associated with 1.81 QALYs and CNY 54101.26. In the CKD cohort, SZC was associated with 3.23 QALYs and CNY 121416.82 total cost; usual care was associated with 2.91 QALYs and CNY 111464.57. SZC resulted in an ICER of CNY 36735.87/QALY for the HF cohort and CNY 31181.55/QALY for the CKD cohort, respectively. The one-way and probability sensitivity analyses found that the results were robust. Conclusion: SZC is a cost-effective treatment compared to usual care in HF and CKD patients. SZC is an important novel treatment option for managing patients with hyperkalemia in China.

Financial Implication of Sodium Zirconium Cyclosilicate Therapy in Patients with Systolic Heart Failure and Hyperkalemia.

Sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC), a newly-introduced potassium binder, can be used to manage hyperkalemia especially in patients with chronic kidney disease and in those on medical therapy which may raise serum potassium levels. The medication may incur additional costs but may in turn have a significant benefit in the effect of maintaining guideline-directed medical therapy for heart failure. We aimed to investigate the financial impact of SZC therapy in patients with systolic heart failure.Patients with systolic heart failure who received SZC for hyperkalemia between July 2020 and March 2023 were included. In-hospital medical costs were compared between the patients who discontinued SZC and those who continued SZC. For the continue group, the cost of SZC was added. All patients were followed for 2 years or until May 2023.A total of 36 patients (median age 81 years, 56% male, median left ventricular ejection fraction 43%) were included. Total medical costs were significantly lower in the continue group (n = 12) compared to the discontinue group (n = 24) (3.1 [3.1, 6.2] versus 12.1 [3.8, 48.6] × 104 JPY per month, P = 0.039). In the continue group, serum potassium levels were decreased, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor doses were up-titrated, and the left ventricular ejection fraction was increased, whereas these parameters remained unchanged or worsened in the discontinue group.SZC may have the potential to assist in the up-titration of potassium-sparing heart failure-specific medications, prevent readmissions, and minimize medical costs, by preventing recurrent hyperkalemia in patients with systolic heart failure.

Impact of Sodium Zirconium Cyclosilicate Plus Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Inhibitor Therapy on Short-Term Medical Costs in Hyperkalemia: OPTIMIZE II Real-World Study.

INTRODUCTION: Patients receiving cardiorenal-protective renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASis) are at increased risk of developing hyperkalemia, which is associated with increased medical costs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of adding sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC) therapy on 3-month medical costs in patients who experienced hyperkalemia while receiving RAASi therapy. METHODS: The retrospective OPTIMIZE II study used medical and pharmacy claims data from IQVIA PharMetrics® Plus. Patients aged ≥ 18 years who received SZC (≥ 60 day supply over 3 months' follow-up) and continued RAASi between July 2019 and December 2021 (Continue RAASi + SZC cohort) were 1:1 exact and propensity score matched with patients who discontinued RAASi after hyperkalemia diagnosis and did not receive SZC (Discontinue RAASi + no SZC cohort). The primary outcome was hyperkalemia-related medical costs to payers over 3 months; all-cause medical and pharmacy costs were also analyzed. RESULTS: In the Continue RAASi + SZC (n = 467) versus Discontinue RAASi + no SZC (n = 467) cohort, there were significant reductions in mean per-patient hyperkalemia-related medical costs (reduction of $2216.07; p = 0.01) and all-cause medical costs (reduction of $6102.43; p < 0.001); mean hyperkalemia-related inpatient medical costs and all-cause inpatient and emergency department medical costs were significantly reduced. The reduction in all-cause medical cost in the Continue RAASi + SZC cohort offset an increase in the mean per-patient all-cause pharmacy cost (increase of $3117.71; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: RAASi therapy has well-established cardiorenal benefits. In OPTIMIZE II, management of RAASi-induced hyperkalemia with SZC was associated with lower hyperkalemia-related and all-cause medical costs than RAASi discontinuation without SZC, demonstrating medical cost savings with maintaining RAASi therapy with SZC.

A cost-effectiveness analysis of patiromer in the UK: evaluation of hyperkalaemia treatment and lifelong RAASi maintenance in chronic kidney disease patients with and without heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients with and without heart failure (HF) often present with hyperkalaemia (HK) leading to increased risk of hospitalisations, cardiovascular related events and cardiovascular-related mortality. Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor (RAASi) therapy, the mainstay treatment in CKD management, provides significant cardiovascular and renal protection. Nevertheless, its use in the clinic is often suboptimal and treatment is frequently discontinued due to its association with HK. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of patiromer, a treatment known to reduce potassium levels and increase cardiorenal protection in patients receiving RAASi, in the UK healthcare setting. METHODS: A Markov cohort model was generated to assess the pharmacoeconomic impact of patiromer treatment in regulating HK in patients with advanced CKD with and without HF. The model was generated to predict the natural history of both CKD and HF and quantify the costs and clinical benefits associated with the use of patiromer for HK management from a healthcare payer's perspective in the UK. RESULTS: Economic evaluation of patiromer use compared to standard of care (SoC) resulted in increased discounted life years (8.93 versus 8.67) and increased discounted quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) (6.36 versus 6.16). Furthermore, patiromer use resulted in incremental discounted cost of £2,973 per patient and an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of £14,816 per QALY gained. On average, patients remained on patiromer therapy for 7.7 months, and treatment associated with a decrease in overall clinical event incidence and delayed CKD progression. Compared to SoC, patiromer use resulted in 218 fewer HK events per 1,000 patients, when evaluating potassium levels at the 5.5-6 mmol/l; 165 fewer RAASi discontinuation episodes; and 64 fewer RAASi down-titration episodes. In the UK, patiromer treatment was predicted to have a 94.5% and 100% chance of cost-effectiveness at willingness-to-pay thresholds (WTP) of £20,000/QALY and £30,000/QALY, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the value of both HK normalisation and RAASi maintenance in CKD patients with and without HF. Results support the guidelines which recommend HK treatment, e.g., patiromer, as a strategy to enable the continuation of RAASi therapy and improve clinical outcomes in CKD patients with and without HF.

Social determinants of patiromer adherence and abandonment: An observational, retrospective, real-world claims analysis.

BACKGROUND: Hyperkalemia is a frequent and serious complication in chronic kidney disease (CKD) that can impede continuation of beneficial evidence-based therapies. Recently, novel therapies such as patiromer have been developed to treat chronic hyperkalemia, but their optimal utility hinges on adherence. Social determinants of health (SDOH) are critically important and can impact both medical conditions and treatment prescription adherence. This analysis examines SDOH and their influence on adherence to patiromer or abandonment of prescriptions for hyperkalemia treatment. METHODS: This was an observational, retrospective, real-world claims analysis of adults with patiromer prescriptions and 6- and 12-months pre- and post-index prescription data in Symphony Health's Dataverse during 2015-2020, and SDOH from census data. Subgroups included patients with heart failure (HF), hyperkalemia-confounding prescriptions, and any CKD stages. Adherence was defined as >80% of proportion of days covered (PDC) for ≥60 days and ≥6 months, and abandonment as a portion of reversed claims. Quasi-Poisson regression modeled the impact of independent variables on PDC. Abandonment models used logistic regression, controlling for similar factors and initial days' supply. Statistical significance was p<0.05. RESULTS: 48% of patients at 60 days and 25% at 6 months had a patiromer PDC >80%. Higher PDC was associated with older age, males, Medicare/Medicaid coverage, nephrologist prescribed, and those receiving renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors. Lower PDC correlated with higher out-of-pocket cost, unemployment, poverty, disability, and any CKD stage with comorbid HF. PDC was better in regions with higher education and income. CONCLUSIONS: SDOH (unemployment, poverty, education, income) and health indicators (disability, comorbid CKD, HF) were associated with low PDC. Prescription abandonment was higher in patients with prescribed higher dose, higher out-of-pocket costs, those with disability, or designated White. Key demographic, social, and other factors play a role in drug adherence when treating life-threatening abnormalities such as hyperkalemia and may influence patient outcomes.

Economic impact of the use of patiromer in chronic kidney disease or heart failure for the treatment of chronic hyperkalemia in Spain.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic hyperkalemia has negative consequences in the medium and long term, and determines the suspension of nephro and cardioprotective drugs, such as renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASi). There is an alternative to the suspension or dose reduction of these treatments: the administration of potassium chelators. The aim of this study is to estimate the economic impact of the use of patiromer in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) or heart failure (HF) and hyperkalemia in Spain. MATERIALS AND METHOD: The annual economic impact of the use of patiromer has been estimated from the perspective of the Spanish society. Two scenarios were compared: patients with CKD or HF and hyperkalemia treated with and without patiromer. The costs have been updated to 2020 euros, using the Health Consumer Price Index. Direct healthcare costs related to the use of resources (treatment with RAASi, CKD progression, cardiovascular events and hospitalization due to hyperkalemia), direct non-healthcare costs (informal care: costs derived from time dedicated by patient's relatives), the indirect costs (productivity loss), as well as an intangible cost (due to premature mortality) were considered. A deterministic sensitivity analysis was performed to validate the robustness of the study results. RESULTS: The mean annual cost per patient in the scenario without patiromer is €9,834.09 and €10,739.37 in CKD and HF, respectively. The use of patiromer would lead to cost savings of over 30% in both diseases. The greatest savings in CKD come from the delay in the progression of CKD. While in the case of HF, 80.1% of these savings come from premature mortality reduction. The sensitivity analyses carried out show the robustness of the results, obtaining savings in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: The incorporation of patiromer allows better control of hyperkalemia and, as a consequence, maintain treatment with RAASi in patients with CKD or HF. This would generate a 32% of annual savings in Spain (€3,127 in CKD; €3,466 in HF). The results support the positive contribution of patiromer to health cost in patients with only CKD or in patients with only HF.

Justification for initiating patiromer when restricted by prior authorization and clinical guidance in a US health care system.

BACKGROUND: In the Veterans Health Administration, patiromer is a formulary medication restricted by prior authorization and criteria-for-use (CFU). Historically, patiromer approval was restricted by step therapy, requiring prescribers to trial sodium polystyrene sulfonate (SPS). OBJECTIVE: To describe clinical scenarios leading to patiromer initiation by characterizing patient experience with primary hyperkalemia treatment modalities, especially SPS. METHODS: All veterans who initiated patiromer between January 1, 2016, and February 28, 2021, with chronic kidney disease and dispensed SPS during the 3 months preceding patiromer were included. A structured chart-review process was used to abstract prior authorization drug request notes to characterize patiromer approval and patient experience with primary pharmacotherapy. Results were reported with descriptive frequencies and proportions. RESULTS: Three hundred thirty-one veterans met inclusion criteria. Primary justification for patiromer initiation included continuation of patiromer initiated outside the Veterans Health Administration or during inpatient stay (5.7%) and SPS inventory shortage (25.4%). CFU justification was mentioned in 83.7% of notes and, among those with CFU justification, SPS treatment was documented in 68.7%. Clinician statements indicating that SPS was ineffective occurred in 65 (41.7%) and statements of safety concerns (either observed or potential) in 37 (23.7%) veterans. CONCLUSIONS: Patiromer approval is multifactorial, and clinicians often opted to avoid long-term SPS use because of safety concerns, lack of consistent availability, and concerns about its appropriateness for longterm hyperkalemia management. DISCLOSURES: Drs Patel and Sauer received funding from Otsuka Canada Pharmaceutical Inc. to study the use of patiromer in the VHA. This material is the result of work supported with resources and the use of facilities at the VA Salt Lake City Health Care System. The views expressed in this manuscript are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the US government. Drs Qualls and Pinnell are supported by the VA Advanced Fellowship Program in Medical Informatics with the Office of Academic Affiliations. This work was funded through a partnered research mechanism. Otsuka Canada Pharmaceutical Inc. was not involved in development or review of this manuscript.

Hyperkalaemia and potassium binders: Retrospective observational analysis looking at the efficacy and cost effectiveness of calcium polystyrene sulfonate and sodium zirconium cyclosilicate.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Hyperkalaemia is a common medical emergency in patients admitted to hospital. There is a limited evidence base supporting some of the commonly applied treatment strategies. Although, NICE has recommended the use of sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC) (TA599) and patiromer (TA623) in both acute and chronic hyperkalaemia, there is a limited evidence base for their use in acute hyperkalaemia in the hospital setting, particularly when compared to the present standard of care calcium polystyrene sulfonate (CPS). METHODS: A retrospective review of the electronic patient record system across our hospital over a 6-month period identified 138 patients who received either SZC (65 patients) or CPS (73 patients) to manage hyperkalaemia, investigating their efficacy and cost effectiveness. Results were analysed using simple descriptive statistics. Based on the results a naïve cost comparison between the two drugs was made. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: CPS and SZC both effectively reduced plasm potassium concentrations in patients with hyperkalaemia (6.07 and 6.03 mmol/L respectively) by 1.17 mmol/L and 1.24 mmol/L taking a similar amount of time to work (2.97 days vs. 3 days). The principle causes of hyperkalaemia identified were acute kidney injury, medication, and chronic kidney disease. Cost comparison analysis which took into account raw product price and time needed to dispense medications revealed that CPS has slightly better cost effectiveness compared to SZC albeit at a cost of increased staff input. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Both CPS and SZC were equally effective at lowering acutely raised potassium concentrations. The cost difference between the two products appears to be small. Claims regarding the benefits of newer agents over older established medications need to be properly explored in randomized trials rather than being based on small scale non-comparative studies.

Cost effectiveness of sodium zirconium cyclosilicate for the treatment of hyperkalaemia in patients with CKD in Norway and Sweden.

BACKGROUND: Hyperkalaemia is common in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and is associated with a range of adverse outcomes. Historically, options for management of chronic hyperkalaemia in the outpatient setting have been limited. Novel oral potassium binders provide a safe, effective therapy for maintenance of normokalaemia in patients with CKD, but despite being approved for reimbursement in many countries, prescription data indicate uptake has been slower than anticipated. This analysis aimed to demonstrate the value to patients and the healthcare system of the potassium binder sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC) for treatment of hyperkalaemia in patients with CKD in Norway and Sweden. METHODS: A published simulation model reflecting the natural history of CKD was adapted to the Norwegian and Swedish settings and used to predict long-term health economic outcomes of treating hyperkalaemia with SZC versus usual care. RESULTS: SZC was highly cost effective compared to usual care in Norway and Sweden, with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of €14,838/QALY in Norway and €14,352/QALY in Sweden, over a lifetime horizon. The acquisition cost of SZC was largely offset by cost savings associated with reductions in hyperkalaemia events and hospitalisations; a modest overall increase in costs was predominantly attributable to costs associated with gains in life years compared with usual care. SZC remained cost effective in all scenarios examined. CONCLUSIONS: SZC was estimated to be cost effective for treating hyperkalaemia. Consequently, improving access to a clinically effective, safe and cost-effective therapy, such as SZC, may result in considerable benefits for CKD patients with hyperkalaemia.

A cost-effectiveness analysis of patiromer for the treatment of hyperkalemia in chronic kidney disease patients with and without heart failure in Spain.

AIMS: Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASi) therapy is commonly used to reduce the risk of death and to slow down disease progression in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), heart failure (HF) and hypertension. However, the cardio-renal benefits of RAASi therapy are also associated with an increased risk of hyperkalemia (HK), which may lead to dose reduction or discontinuation of therapy. Patiromer has demonstrated to reduce the risk of HK, which enables to maintain optimal doses of RAASi therapy. This study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of patiromer for the management of HK in CKD patients with and without HF in Spain. METHODS: A Markov model was developed to evaluate the costs and benefits of patiromer for the management of HK in patients with CKD stages 3-4 with and without HF treated with RAASi over a lifetime horizon. The main outcomes included total direct costs (€2021), quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), life-years gained (LYG) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Deterministic one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of the results. RESULTS: Patiromer was more effective compared to no patiromer (5.76 vs 5.57 QALYs; 7.73 vs 7.50 LYG), and resulted in an incremental cost of €3,574, yielding an ICER of €19,092/QALY gained and of €15,236/LYG. Sensitivity analyses suggested that the results were robust to changes in most input parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Patiromer is a cost-effective intervention in maintaining normokalemia and enabling optimal RAASi therapy in patients with CKD stages 3-4 with and without HF in Spain.

Cost-Effectiveness of Treating Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease and Prior Hyperkalemia with Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Inhibitor and Patiromer: A Swiss Public Healthcare Perspective.

INTRODUCTION: Hyperkalemia is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Patiromer (Veltassa®) is an oral potassium binder indicated for the treatment of hyperkalemia in adults. We evaluated the impact of patiromer on the Swiss healthcare resources when used in patients with CKD and hyperkalemia who were on renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor (RAASi) treatment. METHODS: We built a decision tree and calculated the number needed to treat (NNT) to prevent hyperkalemia, hospitalization, and death based on published aggregated data. The decision tree was populated with available data from relevant patiromer clinical trials and data were applied to create a simple model showing the expected effectiveness of adding patiromer to the treatment of patients with medium-to-severe stage CKD on RAASi compared to RAASi only. Adapting the model to the Swiss healthcare system allowed us to estimate the impact of the new treatment on healthcare expenditures from a payer as well as a Swiss public healthcare perspective. RESULTS: Patiromer reduced the absolute risk for recurrent hyperkalemia by 48% within 8 weeks, resulting in an NNT of 2.1 [95% CI 1.4, 3.7]. If one assumes that 90%, 50%, or 10% of all moderate-to-severe hyperkalemic events lead to hospitalization, the NNT to prevent one hospitalization would be 2.5, 4.4, and 22.2, respectively. On the basis of the death rate of patients with mild or moderate-to-severe hyperkalemia, and the prevalence of mild or moderate-to-severe hyperkalemia in the treatment and control groups, the NNT was 78.7 [95% CI 64.0, 99.3] to prevent one death. Patiromer resulted in expected cost offsets of CHF 303 (1 CHF = 0.95 EUR as of 2022) per patient over 8 weeks in Switzerland. CONCLUSION: Patiromer used for the treatment of CKD reduces hyperkalemia recurrence leading to improved patient care. This results in substantial offset costs for the Swiss healthcare system.

Hyperkalaemia in the emergency department: Epidemiology, management and monitoring of treatment outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the epidemiology, treatment and monitoring of treatment outcomes of patients presenting to the ED with hyperkalaemia. METHODS: We undertook a retrospective observational study in a mixed adult/paediatric ED over five 3-month periods. Consecutive patients were included if they had an initial serum or blood gas potassium ≥6.0 mmol/L. Patients were excluded if their principal diagnosis was diabetic ketoacidosis, their blood sample was haemolysed or the blood gas result was inconsistent with a subsequent serum potassium. Data were extracted from electronic medical records and two senior emergency registrars independently assessed available ECGs. Moderate and severe hyperkalaemia were potassium 6.0-6.4 and ≥6.5 mmol/L, respectively. RESULTS: Overall, 392 patients were included (mean age 73.7 years, triage category 1 or 2 28.3%, admitted 91.3%). Three hundred and twenty-one (81.9%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 77.6-85.5%) patients took one or more medications that predispose to hyperkalaemia and 335 (85.5%, 95% CI 81.5-88.7%) had one or more predisposing comorbidities. Two hundred and seventy-one (69.1%, 95% CI 64.3-73.6%) patients had moderately severe and 121 (30.9%, 95% CI 26.4-35.7%) had severe hyperkalaemia. Two hundred and fifty-nine (66.1%, 95% CI 61.1-70.7%) patients were administered at least one medication in ED to lower the potassium concentration and 51 (13.0%, 95% CI 9.9-16.8%) were dialysed. One hundred and eighty-seven patients received intravenous insulin: 40 (21.4%) had documented biochemical hypoglycaemia, but 45 (24.1%) had no post-insulin blood glucose level documented. Hyperkalaemia-associated ECG changes were uncommon. CONCLUSION: Most ED patients with hyperkalaemia have identifiable clinical and medication-related risk factors. Variations in care were widespread and monitoring for iatrogenic adverse events was suboptimal.

Rates of Spironolactone Initiation and Subsequent Hyperkalemia Hospitalizations in Patients with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction Following the TOPCAT trial: A Cohort Study of Medicare Beneficiaries.

BACKGROUND: The impact of the TOPCAT trial publication on spironolactone initiation and subsequent hospitalizations for hyperkalemia among patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) has not been evaluated empirically. METHODS AND RESULTS: We designed a cohort study using US Medicare fee-for-service data. Annual cohorts of patients with HFpEF from 2013 to 2018 were identified based on a validated claims-based phenotyping model. We determined spironolactone initiation in each annual cohort overall and within subgroups with hyperkalemia risk factors of baseline renin-angiotensin system inhibitors use, chronic kidney disease, and diabetes. We reported incidence rates of hospitalization for hyperkalemia within 6 months of treatment initiation. A total of 621,171 patients with HFpEF (mean age 80 ± 8 years, 62.9% female) were included. We identified 40,241 initiations of spironolactone with initiation rate/100 person-years of 16.8 (95% confidence interval [CI] 16.4-17.1) in 2013 and increasing to 19.9 (95% CI 19.4-20.5) in 2018. Among initiators, we identified a total of 164 hyperkalemia hospitalization with stable incidence rates per 1000 person-years between 2013 (12.0, 95% CI 8.8-16.1) and 2018 (10.6, 95% CI 6.2-17.0). These results were consistent for all subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: After the dissemination of TOPCAT findings, we noted a steady increase in the initiation of spironolactone, but not in hyperkalemia hospitalizations.

Assessment of Patiromer Monotherapy for Hyperkalemia in an Acute Care Setting.

Importance: Hyperkalemia is a common electrolyte disorder in hospitalized patients; however, the clinical usefulness of administering patiromer for reduction of serum potassium levels in this setting is unknown. Objective: To evaluate the outcomes associated with patiromer as monotherapy in patients with acute hyperkalemia in an acute care setting. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used electronic health record data from adult patients treated with patiromer for acute hyperkalemia in emergency departments, inpatient units, and intensive care units at an urban, academic medical center in the Bronx, New York, between January 30, 2018, and December 30, 2019. Data analysis was conducted between June 2020 and February 2021. Exposures: A single dose of oral patiromer (8.4 g, 16.8 g, or 25.2 g). Main Outcomes and Measure: The primary outcome was the mean absolute reduction in serum potassium level from baseline at 3 distinct time intervals after patiromer administration: 0 to 6 hours, greater than 6 to 12 hours, and greater than 12 to 24 hours. Key secondary outcomes were the incidence of hypokalemia and potassium reduction stratified by baseline potassium level and care setting. Results: Among 881 encounters of patiromer treatment, the mean (SD) age of patients was 67.4 (14.4) years; 463 encounters (52.6%) were for male patients, and most (338 [38.4%]) were for patients who identified as non-Hispanic Black. The mean (SD) baseline serum potassium level was 5.60 (0.35) mEq/L (to convert to mmol/L, multiply by 1.0), and within the first 6 hours after patiromer administration, the mean (SD) potassium reduction was 0.50 (0.56) mEq/L (P < .001). Both absolute and relative potassium reduction from baseline varied across baseline hyperkalemia severity but not by care setting. The lowest dose of patiromer (8.4 g) was used in 721 encounters (81.8%), and in 725 encounters (82.3%), no further doses of a potassium binder were required. Hypokalemia was noted in 2 encounters (0.2%) at 24 hours after patiromer administration. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of patients with acute, non-life-threatening hyperkalemia, a single dose of patiromer was associated with a significant decrease in serum potassium levels and a low incidence of hypokalemia. These findings suggest that patiromer monotherapy may be useful in an institutional setting for managing elevated potassium levels and minimizing the risk of hypokalemia associated with other potassium control measures.

Cost Consequence Analysis of the Management of Hyperkalemia by Patiromer and Optimization of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Inhibitors Therapy in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients in Saudi Arabia.

Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASi) have been shown to improve outcomes in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients but are associated with an increased risk of hyperkalemia in this vulnerable population. Hyperkalemia often leads to patients' downtitrating or discontinuing RAASi which can result in sub-optimal health outcomes. The objective is to evaluate the cost and health benefits of maintaining normokalemia using patiromer, an oral potassium binder while optimizing RAASi therapy in CKD patients in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The medium-to long-term costs and health outcomes of patients with CKD stage 3-4 and raised serum potassium levels (≥5.5 mmol/L) at baseline were estimated, from a Saudi Arabia payer perspective, using a Markov state-transition model simulating the natural progression of CKD depending on patients' serum potassium level and usage of RAASi at different dosages. The analysis demonstrated that appropriate management of hyperkalemia, enabling optimization of RAASi, leads to cost and health benefits. The cost of patiromer is offset by 68% due to a reduction in management costs associated with CKD progression, hyperkalemia-related hospitalization, and cardiovascular (CV) events. Over a 10-year time horizon, a pool of 300 patients treated with patiromer experience increased life-expectancy [+3.78 life-years (LYs)] and slower disease progression, with decreased time spent in end-stage renal disease (-9.59 LYs). Patiromer may deliver value to both CKD patients and payers in Saudi Arabia, leading to better health outcomes for the former and reduced cost of management of CKD progression and CV events at low additional costs for the latter.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Patiromer in Combination with Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Inhibitors for Chronic Kidney Disease in Sweden.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are commonly treated with renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASi) in order to delay progression of renal disease. However, research has shown that RAASi in CKD patients increases hyperkalaemia (HK) prevalence, which leads to RAASi discontinuation or dose reduction with the loss of benefits on the kidney. Patiromer is a novel therapy for HK treatment and may enable patients to remain on their RAASi regimen. This study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of patiromer from a Swedish healthcare perspective. METHODS: A Markov model was developed to evaluate the economic outcomes of patiromer versus no patiromer in HK patients with stage 3-4 CKD taking RAASi. The model consisted of six health states reflecting disease progression and hospitalisations. The analysis mainly considered clinical data from the OPAL-HK trial and national costs. The main outcomes of interest were incremental costs (euro [EUR] 2016) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), discounted at 3%, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Extensive uncertainty analyses were performed. RESULTS: In comparison to no patiromer, a patiromer patient gained 0.14 QALYs and an incremental cost of EUR 6109 (Swedish krona [SEK] 57,850), yielding an ICER of EUR 43,307 (SEK 410,072)/QALY gained. The results were robust to a range of sensitivity analyses. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of EUR 52,804 (SEK 500,000)/QALY, patiromer had a 50% chance of being cost-effective. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that patiromer may demonstrate value for money in Swedish patients with stage 3-4 CKD, by enabling RAASi treatment. However, there is a considerable degree of uncertainty.

Hyperkalemia treatment modalities: A descriptive observational study focused on medication and healthcare resource utilization.

Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor (RAASi) therapy has been shown to improve outcomes among patients with congestive heart failure, diabetes, or renal dysfunction. These patients are also at risk for the development of hyperkalemia (HK), often leading to down-titration and/or discontinuation of RAASi therapy. Patiromer is the first sodium-free, non-absorbed potassium (K+) binder approved for the treatment of hyperkalemia (HK) in over 50 years. We described the association between use of K+ binders (Patiromer and sodium polystyrene sulfonate [SPS]) and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor (RAASi), on healthcare resource utilization (HRU). The study population consisted of Medicare Advantage patients with HK (K+ ≥ 5.0 mmol/L) in Optum's Clinformatics® Data Mart between 1/1/2016-12/31/2017. Patiromer and (SPS) initiators, and HK patients not exposed to a K+ binder (NoKb) were included. The index date was the date of the first K+ binder dispensing or HK diagnosis. Outcomes assessed at 6 months post-index were: (1) K+ binder utilization, (2) RAASi continuation, and (3) HRU (pre- vs post-index). HRU change was analyzed using McNemar's statistical test. Study cohorts included 610 (patiromer), 5556 (SPS), and 21,282 (NoKb) patients. Overall baseline patient characteristics were: mean age 75 years; female 49%, low-income subsidy 29%, chronic kidney disease 48% (63% for patiromer cohort), and congestive heart failure 29%. At 6 months post-index, 28% (patiromer) and 2% (SPS) remained continuously exposed to the index K+ binder. RAASi continued for 78% (patiromer), 57% (SPS), and 57% (NoKb). The difference (pre- vs post-index) in hospitalized patients was: -9.4% (patiromer; P<0.05), -7.2% (SPS), and +16.8% (NoKb; P<0.001). Disparate K+ binder utilization patterns were observed. The majority of patiromer patients continued RAASi therapy while the percentage of SPS patients that continued RAASi therapy was lower, overlapping CIs were observed. Following continuous patiromer exposure, statistically significant reductions in hospital admissions and emergency department visits were observed, continuous SPS exposure observed no statistically significant reductions in either hospitalizations or ED visits, while NoKb patients with continuous exposure had statistically significant increases in both. Further research, with a larger sample size using comparative analytic methods, is warranted.