A new computational fluid dynamics based noninvasive assessment of portacaval pressure gradient.

Accurate assessment of portacaval pressure gradient (PCG) in patients with portal hypertension (PH) is of great significance both for diagnosis and treatment. This study aims to develop a noninvasive method for assessing PCG in PH patients and evaluate its accuracy and effectiveness. This study recruited 37 PH patients treated with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). computed tomography angiography was used to create three dimension (3D) models of each patient before and after TIPS. Doppler ultrasound examinations were conducted to obtain the patient's portal vein flow (or splenic vein and superior mesenteric vein). Using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation, the patient's pre-TIPS and post-TIPS PCG was determined by the 3D models and ultrasound measurements. The accuracy of these noninvasive results was then compared to clinical invasive measurements. The results showed a strong linear correlation between the PCG simulated by CFD and the clinical invasive measurements both before and after TIPS (R2 = 0.998, P < 0.001 and R2 = 0.959, P < 0.001). The evaluation accuracy of this noninvasive method reached 94 %, and the influence of ultrasound result errors on the numerical accuracy was found to be marginal if the error was less than 20 %. Furthermore, the information about the hemodynamic environment in the portal system was obtained by this numerical method. Spiral flow patterns were observed in the portal vein of some patients. In a conclusion, this study proposes a noninvasive numerical method for assessing PCG in PH patients before and after TIPS. This method can assist doctors in accurately diagnosing patients and selecting appropriate treatment plans. Additionally, it can be used to further investigate potential biomechanical causes of complications related to TIPS in the future.

Morphometric assessment of the left inferior phrenic vein in patients with portal hypertension.

The left inferior phrenic vein (LIPV) is a major drainage vessel of gastric varices and serves as an important conduit in endovascular treatment for gastric varices. The narrowing of LIPV has been empirically demonstrated and sometimes hinders catheter insertion for the treatment of gastric varices. We herein investigated the morphology of narrowed LIPV in patients with portal hypertension. Venograms of LIPV on 25 patients with gastric varices (15 males; 10 females; age range, 45-79 years with a mean of 67 years) were retrospectively reviewed, the following four parameters were measured: the diameter of LIPV, the diameter of narrowed LIPV, the narrowing rate, and the distance to narrowed LIPV from the left renal vein. On all 25 venograms, a narrowing was detected just above the common trunk with the left adrenal vein. The diameter of LIPV was 9.0 ± 4.2 mm, the diameter of narrowed LIPV was 5.1 ± 2.3 mm, the narrowing rate was 40.6 ± 16.0%, and the distance to narrowed LIPV from the left renal vein was 20.0 ± 7.4 mm. This anatomical information about the narrowing of LIPV may contribute to the safe and efficacious treatment of gastric varices.

The severity of portal hypertension by a non-invasive assessment: acoustic structure quantification analysis of liver parenchyma.

BACKGROUND: Acoustic structure quantification (ASQ) has been applied to evaluate liver histologic changes by analyzing the speckle pattern seen on B-mode ultrasound. We aimed to assess the severity of portal hypertension (PHT) through hepatic ultrasonography. METHODS: Sixty patients diagnosed with PHT and underwent surgical treatment with portosystemic shunts were enrolled. Portal pressure (PP) was measured intraoperatively. Patients were divided into subgroups according to the severity of gastroesophageal varices and Child-Pugh class. Three difference ratio (Cm2) values on ASQ histogram mode were analyzed for their relationships with PP, degree of gastroesophageal varices and Child-Pugh liver function. Thirty healthy volunteers matched with the patients for gender and age were enrolled as controls. Comparisons among groups and correlation of the parameters with PP were analyzed. Area under the receive operating characteristic curve was used to evaluate the predicting value of ASQ parameters. RESULTS: In the patients, the ASQ parameters peak Cm2 (Cm2max), mean Cm2 (Cm2mean) and the highest occurred Cm2 value of the obtained red curve (RmaxCm2) were all greatly increased (P < 0.0001, P < 0.0001, P = 0.027). Multiple comparisons indicated that, regardless of Child-Pugh class and degree of gastroesophageal varices, the patients had significantly increased Cm2max and Cm2mean compared with the controls (all P < 0.0001). No differences among subgroups were observed. Cm2max was significantly statistically correlated with PP (r = 0.3505, P < 0.01), degree of varices (r = 0.4998, P < 0.0001). Youden's index for Cm2max with a cut-off value of 140.3 for predicting the presence of PHT, gastroesophageal varices and liver function equal to or worse than Child-Pugh class B were 0.8, 0.91 and 0.84, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: ASQ analysis of ultrasonographic images may have a role in the evaluation of the severity of PHT by detecting liver histologic changes in the speckle pattern caused by cirrhosis.

Assessment of clinically significant portal hypertension by two-dimensional shear wave elastography.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: To evaluate two-dimensional shear wave elastography (2DSWE) in parallel with transient elastography (TE) for diagnosing clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) and high-risk varices (HRV) in patients with chronic liver disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients with suspicion of compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD) [liver stiffness measurement (LSM) ≥ 10 kPa by TE, or morphological signs suggestive of cACLD on imaging], with no history of liver decompensation, underwent hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurement, transjugular liver biopsy and esophagogastroduodenoscopy, which served as the reference methods for diagnosing CSPH, cACLD and HRV. All patients underwent LSM and spleen stiffness measurements (SSM) by 2DSWE and TE. RESULTS: Seventy-six (76) patients were included (78% men, mean age 62 years, body mass index 28.3 kg/m2 , 36.8% alcoholic, 30.3% non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, 14.5% viral hepatitis). Of them, 80.3%, 69.7%, 52.6% and 22.4% had cACLD, cirrhosis, CSPH and HRV respectively. LSM performed better than SSM in diagnosing CSPH and HRV. For CSPH, AUROCs (0.926 vs. 0.866), optimal cut-offs (20.1 vs. 20.2 kPa) and sensitivity/specificity (80.5%/94.3% vs. 77.5% /86.1%) were comparable for 2DSWE and TE. Ruling-out of CSPH by 2DSWE (LSM at cut-off with ≥90% sensitivity (13.5 kPa) and platelets ≥ 150 x 109 /L) performed comparably to TE, with 1/24 cases falsely classified as negative. For HRV, AUROCs were similar (0.875 2DSWE, 0.851 TE) with similar optimal LSM cut-offs enabling 100% sensitivity and ruling-out HRV. CONCLUSION: Liver stiffness measurement by 2DSWE appears to perform equally well as TE for diagnosing CSPH and ruling-out HRV in compensated chronic liver disease.

Angiographic diagnosis for accurate assessment of congenital porto-systemic shunt and extrahepatic portal vein obstruction in children.

BACKGROUND: Congenital porto-systemic shunt (CPSS) is a rare disease and can cause fatal complications. Accurate angiographic assessment is mandatory for proper treatment. Although technically difficult, we developed assessment techniques and assessed their accuracy. One technique came from evaluating patients with extrahepatic portal vein obstruction (EHPVO). METHODS: We conducted a single center retrospective study to evaluate the efficacy of angiographic diagnostic procedure for the assessment of CPSS and EHPVO, and its impact on patients' subsequent interventions and clinical course. Eight patients with CPSS and two patients with EHPVO who underwent diagnostic angiography were included. Assessment of the intrahepatic portal vein was performed in all patients. The route of the shunt, and portal vein pressure under shunt occlusion, were also evaluated for patients with CPSS. Evaluation was first attempted with a balloon angiographic catheter (standard method). Three additional techniques were performed as needed: (i) direct wedge-catheter injection without balloon inflation, (ii) use of occlusion balloon in two patients, and (iii) hybrid angiography with sheath placement directly into the superior mesenteric vein. RESULTS: The standard method was sufficient in four patients. On the other hand, all three techniques were required in two patients each. One lost contact during follow up, but all other patients underwent optimal intervention. There were no complications related to the angiographic procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Use of direct wedge-catheter injection without balloon inflation, occlusion balloon, and hybrid catheterization improved the diagnostic yield in patients with CPSS or EHPVO.

Noninvasive assessment of clinically significant portal hypertension using ΔT1 of the liver and spleen and ECV of the spleen on routine Gd-EOB-DTPA liver MRI.

PURPOSE: To analyze the predictive value of ΔT1 of the liver and spleen as well as the extracellular volume fraction (ECV) of the spleen as noninvasive biomarkers for the determination of clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) on routine Gd-EOB-DTPA liver MRI. METHOD: 195 consecutive patients with known or suspected chronic liver disease from 9/2018 to 7/2019 with Gd-EOB-DTPA liver MRI and abdominal T1 mapping were retrospectively included. Based on the presence of splenomegaly with thrombocytopenia, ascites and portosystemic collaterals, the patients were divided into noCSPH (n = 113), compensated CSPH (cCSPH, ≥1 finding without ascites; n = 55) and decompensated CSPH (dCSPH, ascites ± other findings; n = 27). T1 times were measured in the liver, spleen and abdominal aorta in the unenhanced and contrast-enhanced T1 maps. Native T1 times and ΔT1 of the liver and spleen as well as ECV of the spleen were compared between groups using the Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn's post hoc test. Furthermore, cutoff values for group differentiation were calculated using ROC analysis with Youden's index. RESULTS: ΔT1 of the liver was significantly lower in patients with cCSPH and dCSPH (p < 0.001) compared to patients with noCSPH. In the ROC analyses for differentiation between noCSPH and CSPH (cCSPH + dCSPH), a cutoff of < 0.67 for ΔT1 of the liver (AUC = 0.79) performed better than ΔT1 (AUC = 0.69) and ECV (AUC = 0.63) of the spleen with cutoffs of > 0.29 and > 41.9, respectively. CONCLUSION: ΔT1 of the liver and spleen in addition to ECV of the spleen allow for determination of CSPH on routine Gd-EOB-DTPA liver MRI.

Magnetic resonance parametric mapping of the spleen for non-invasive assessment of portal hypertension.

OBJECTIVES: In patients with advanced liver disease, portal hypertension is an important risk factor, leading to complications such as esophageal variceal bleeding, ascites, and hepatic encephalopathy. This study aimed to determine the diagnostic value of T1 and T2 mapping and extracellular volume fraction (ECV) for the non-invasive assessment of portal hypertension. METHODS: In this prospective study, 50 participants (33 patients with indication for trans-jugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) and 17 healthy volunteers) underwent MRI. The derivation and validation cohorts included 40 and 10 participants, respectively. T1 and T2 relaxation times and ECV of the liver and the spleen were assessed using quantitative mapping techniques. Direct hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) and portal pressure measurements were performed during TIPS procedure. ROC analysis was performed to compare diagnostic performance. RESULTS: Splenic ECV correlated with portal pressure (r = 0.72; p < 0.001) and direct HVPG (r = 0.50; p = 0.003). No significant correlations were found between native splenic T1 and T2 relaxation times with portal pressure measurements (p > 0.05, respectively). In the derivation cohort, splenic ECV revealed a perfect diagnostic performance with an AUC of 1.000 for the identification of clinically significant portal hypertension (direct HVPG ≥ 10 mmHg) and outperformed other parameters: hepatic T2 (AUC, 0.731), splenic T2 (AUC, 0.736), and splenic native T1 (AUC, 0.806) (p < 0.05, respectively). The diagnostic performance of mapping parameters was comparable in the validation cohort. CONCLUSION: Splenic ECV was associated with portal pressure measurements in patients with advanced liver disease. Future studies should explore the diagnostic value of parametric mapping accross a broader range of pressure values. KEY POINTS: • Non-invasive assessment and monitoring of portal hypertension is an area of unmet interest. • Splenic extracellular volume fraction is strongly associated with portal pressure in patients with end-stage liver disease. • Quantitative splenic and hepatic MRI-derived parameters have a potential to become a new non-invasive diagnostic parameter to assess and monitor portal pressure.

Quantitative assessment of portal hypertension with bi-parametric dual-frequency hepatic MR elastography in mouse models.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the potential of bi-parametric dual-frequency hepatic MR elastography (MRE) for predicting portal pressure (PP) in mouse models of portal hypertension (PHTN) with the presence of varying hepatic fibrosis. METHODS: We studied 73 wild-type male mice, including 22 mice with hepatic congestion, 20 mice with cholestatic liver injury, and 31 age-matched sham mice. Hepatic shear stiffness (SS) and volumetric strain (VS) were calculated by 3D MRE acquired at 80 and 200 Hz. We measured PP immediately after MRE. Liver fibrosis was verified by hydroxyproline assay. We predicted PP by fitting generalized linear models with single- and dual-frequency SS and VS, respectively. The relationship between predicted and actual PP was evaluated by Spearman's correlation. We compared the prediction accuracy of portal hypertension for all models with DeLong tests at a significance level of 0.05. RESULTS: Animals with congestive or cholestatic liver disease developed significant PHTN and hepatic fibrosis to varying degrees. In both models, SS increased, while VS decreased significantly compared with shams. All bi-parametric models had high diagnostic accuracy for PHTN. The dual-frequency models (AUCs: 0.90 [81-95%], 0.91 [81-95%]) had substantially or significantly higher accuracy than single-frequency ones (AUCs: 0.83 [71-91%], and 0.78 [66-87%]). The predicted PP of dual-frequency models also showed stronger correlations with actual PP than single-frequency predictions. CONCLUSIONS: The bi-parametric dual-frequency model improved the diagnostic accuracy of liver MRE in diagnosing PHTN in preclinical models. This technical advance has the potential to monitor PHTN progression and treatment efficacy in the presence of varying fibrosis. KEY POINTS: • Bi-parametric hepatic MR elastography can predict portal pressure. • The prediction models of shear stiffness and volumetric strain with dual-frequency measurements demonstrate high diagnostic accuracy (AUCs > 0.9) in two different portal hypertension mouse models with varying fibrosis.

[Experimental studies for noninvasive assessment of portal vein pressure based on contrast enhanced subharmonic sonographic imaging].

Portal hypertension (PHT) is a common complication of liver cirrhosis, which could be measured by the means of portal vein pressure (PVP). However, there is no report about an effective and reliable way to achieve noninvasive assessment of PVP so far. In this study, firstly, we collected ultrasound images and echo signals of different ultrasound contrast agent (UCA) concentrations and different pressure ranges in a low-pressure environment based on an in vitro simulation device. Then, the amplitudes of the subharmonics in the echo signal were obtained by ultrasound grayscale image construction and fast Fourier transform (FFT). Finally, we analyzed the relationship between subharmonic amplitude (SA) and bionic portal vein pressure (BPVP) through linear regression. As a result, in the pressure range of 7.5-45 mm Hg and 8-20 mm Hg, the linear correlation coefficients (LCC) between SA and BPVP were 0.927 and 0.913 respectively when the UCA concentration was 1∶3 000, and LCC were 0.737 and 0.568 respectively when the UCA concentration was 1∶6 000. Particularly, LCC was increased to 0.968 and 0.916 respectively while the SAs of two UCA concentrations were used as the features of BPVP. Therefore, the results show a good performance on the linear relationship between SA and BPVP, and the LCC will be improved by using SAs obtained at different UCA concentrations as the features of BPVP. The proposed method provides reliable experimental verification for noninvasive evaluation of PVP through SA in clinical practice, which could be a guidance for improving the accuracy of PVP assessment.

Noninvasive imaging assessment of portal hypertension.

Portal hypertension (PH) is a spectrum of complications of chronic liver disease (CLD) and cirrhosis, with manifestations including ascites, gastroesophageal varices, splenomegaly, hypersplenism, hepatic hydrothorax, hepatorenal syndrome, hepatopulmonary syndrome and portopulmonary hypertension. PH can vary in severity and is diagnosed via invasive hepatic venous pressure gradient measurement (HVPG), which is considered the reference standard. Accurate diagnosis of PH and assessment of severity are highly relevant as patients with clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) are at higher risk for developing acute variceal bleeding and mortality. In this review, we discuss current and upcoming noninvasive imaging methods for diagnosis and assessment of severity of PH.

Assessment of a biofluid mechanics-based model for calculating portal pressure in canines.

BACKGROUND: Portal hypertension is a severe complication caused by various chronic liver diseases. The standard methods for detecting portal hypertension (hepatic venous pressure gradient and free portal pressure) are available in only a few hospitals due to their technical difficulty and invasiveness; thus, non-invasive measuring methods are needed. This study aimed to establish and assess a novel model to calculate free portal pressure based on biofluid mechanics. RESULT: Comparison of each dog's virtual and actual free portal pressure showed that a biofluid mechanics-based model could accurately predict free portal pressure (mean difference: -0.220, 95% CI: - 0.738 to 0.298; upper limit of agreement: 2.24, 95% CI: 1.34 to 3.14; lower limit of agreement: -2.68, 95% CI: - 3.58 to - 1.78; intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.96 to 0.99; concordance correlation coefficient: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.93 to 0.99) and had a high AUC (0.984, 95% CI: 0.834 to 1.000), sensitivity (92.3, 95% CI: 64.0 to 99.8), specificity (91.7, 95% CI: 61.5 to 99.8), positive likelihood ratio (11.1, 95% CI: 1.7 to 72.8), and low negative likelihood ratio (0.08, 95% CI: 0.01 to 0.6) for detecting portal hypertension. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that the biofluid mechanics-based model was able to accurately predict free portal pressure and detect portal hypertension in canines. With further research and validation, this model might be applicable for calculating human portal pressure, detecting portal hypertensive patients, and evaluating disease progression and treatment efficacy.

MR elastography, T1 and T2 relaxometry of liver: role in noninvasive assessment of liver function and portal hypertension.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the correlation between liver stiffness as measured on MR elastography and T1 and T2 relaxation times from T1 and T2 mapping with clinical parameters of liver disease, including the MELD score, MELD-Na and ALBI grade, and endoscopically visible esophageal varices. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 223 patients with known or suspected liver disease underwent MRI of the liver with T1 mapping (Look-Locker sequence) and 2D SE-EPI MR elastography (MRE) sequences. 139 of these patients also underwent T2 mapping with radial T2 FS sequence. Two readers measured liver stiffness, T1 relaxation times and T2 relaxation times, and assessed qualitative features such as presence or absence of cirrhosis, ascites, spleen length, and varices on conventional MRI images. A third reader collected the clinical data (MELD score, MELD-Na Score, ALBI grade, and results of endoscopy in 78 patients). RESULTS: Significant moderate correlation was found between MELD score and all three imaging techniques for both readers (MRE, r = 0.35 and 0.28; T1 relaxometry, r = 0.30 and 0.29; T2 relaxometry, r = 0.45, and 0.37 for reader 1 and reader 2 respectively). Correlation with MELD-Na score was even higher (MRE, r = 0.49 and 0.40; T1, r = 0.45 and 0.41; T2, r = 0.47 and 0.35 for reader 1 and reader 2 respectively). Correlations between MRE and ALBI grade was significant and moderate for both readers: r = 0.39 and 0.37, higher than T1 relaxometry (r = 0.22 and 0.20) and T2 relaxometry (r = 0.17, and r = 0.24). Significant moderate correlations were found for both readers between MRE and the presence of varices on endoscopy (r = 0.28 and 0.30). MRE and T1 relaxometry were significant predictors of varices at endoscopy for both readers (MRE AUC 0.923 and 0.873; T1 relaxometry AUC = 0.711 and 0.675 for reader 1 and reader 2 respectively). Cirrhotic morphology (AUC = 0.654), spleen length (AUC = 0.610) and presence of varices in the upper abdomen on MRI (AUC of 0.693 and 0.595) were all significant predictors of endoscopic varices. Multivariable logistic regression model identified that spleen length and liver MRE were significant independent predictors of endoscopic varices for both readers. CONCLUSION: MR elastography, T1 and T2 relaxometry demonstrated moderate positive correlation with the MELD score and MELD-Na Score. Correlation between MRE and ALBI grade was superior to T1 and T2 relaxometry methods. MRE performed better than T1 and T2 relaxometry to predict the presence of varices at endoscopy. On multivariate analyses, spleen length and MRE were the only two significant independent predictors of endoscopic varices.

Risk assessment of first upper gastrointestinal bleeding using computerized tomoscanning in esophageal varices patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension.

To evaluate the risk of first upper gastrointestinal bleeding by computerized tomoscanning (CT) for esophageal varices patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension.One hundred thirty two esophageal varices patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension who are also complicated with gastrointestinal bleeding were recruited as bleeding group, while another 132 patients without bleeding as non-bleeding group. The diameter of esophageal varices, number of vascular sections, and total area of blood vessels were measured by CT scanning. The sensitivity and specificity of these indicators were calculated, and Youden index was adjusted with the critical point.The diameter of esophageal varices was 7.83 ±â€Š2.76 mm in bleeding group, and 6.57 ±â€Š3.42 mm in non-bleeding group. The Youden index was 0.32 with the critical point 5.55 mm. The area under the receiver operating characteristics (AUROC) was 0.72. The number of venous vessels was 4.5 ±â€Š2 in bleeding group, whereas being 4 ±â€Š2 in non-bleeding group. The Youden index was 0.35 with a critical point 4, and the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.68. The blood vessel area was 1.73 ±â€Š1.15 cm in bleeding group, and 1.12 ±â€Š0.89 cm in non-bleeding group. The Youden index was 0.48 with the critical point being 1.03 cm, and corresponding AUC was 0.82.Among all 3 indicators of the total area, diameter, and number of sections of the esophageal varices, the total area of esophageal varices showed more accuracy as a potential and novel indicator for bleeding prediction.

Two-dimensional Shear Wave Elastography with Propagation Maps for the Assessment of Liver Fibrosis and Clinically Significant Portal Hypertension in Patients with Chronic Liver Disease: A Prospective Study.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the diagnostic performance of liver stiffness (LS) measurements on two-dimensional (2D) shear wave elastography (SWE) for the assessment of hepatic fibrosis using LS measurements on MR elastography (MRE) as the reference standard and the prediction of clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH). METHODS: In this prospective study, 101 patients with chronic liver disease or cirrhosis underwent both MRE and SWE. After exclusion of technical failure on MRE (n = 5), technical failure/unreliable measurement on SWE (n = 4), LS measurements obtained on SWE with the aid of propagation maps were correlated with those of the MRE using Pearson's correlation analysis. Diagnostic performances for significant fibrosis (≥F2: MRE of ≥2.99 kPa) or cirrhosis (F4: MRE of ≥3.63 kPa) and for the prediction of CSPH were assessed using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS: LS values on SWE showed a strong correlation with those on MRE (r = 0.846, P < 0.001). For the diagnosis of significant fibrosis or cirrhosis in patients with hepatitis B virus-related liver disease (n = 75), SWE showed areas under the ROC curves (AUC) of 0.975 and 0.912, respectively (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.910-997, and 0.824-0.965). For the prediction of CSPH, the AUC of SWE was 0.818 (95% CI, 0.712-0.898), and when an LS value of 11.5 kPa was applied as a cut-off, SWE showed a sensitivity of 81.5% and a specificity of 72.9%. CONCLUSION: LS measurements on 2D SWE were demonstrated to be well correlated with those obtained with MRE, and thus, may provide good diagnostic performance for the prediction of hepatic fibrosis and the presence of CSPH.

Establishment and assessment of the hepatic venous pressure gradient using biofluid mechanics (HVPGBFM): protocol for a prospective, randomised, non-controlled, multicentre study.

INTRODUCTION: Portal hypertension (PH) is a severe disease with a poor outcome. Hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG), the current gold standard to detect PH, is available only in few hospitals due to its invasiveness and technical difficulty. This study aimed to establish and assess a novel model to calculate HVPG based on biofluid mechanics. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a prospective, randomised, non-controlled, multicentre trial. A total of 248 patients will be recruited in this study, and each patient will undergo CT, blood tests, Doppler ultrasound and HVPG measurement. The study consists of two independent and consecutive cohorts: original cohort (124 patients) and validation cohort (124 patients). The researchers will establish and improve the HVPG using biofluid mechanics (HVPGBFM)model in the original cohort and assess the model in the validation cohort. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by the Scientific Research Projects Approval Determination of Independent Ethics Committee of Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine (approval number 2017-430 T326). Study findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03470389.

Noninvasive Assessment of Portal Hypertension Using Spectral Computed Tomography.

BACKGROUND: Early diagnosis of portal hypertension is imperative for timely treatment to reduce the mortality rate. However, there is still no adequate method to noninvasively and accurately assess the portal hypertension in routine clinical practice. PURPOSE: We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of parameters measured using dual energy spectral computed tomography (LightSpeed CT750 HD) in assessing portal venous pressure in patients with liver cirrhosis. STUDY: Forty-five patients with liver cirrhosis who underwent percutaneous transhepatic portal vein puncture as part of their treatment for liver disease were enrolled in this study. Measurement of direct portal venous pressure was performed preoperatively. All patients underwent dual energy spectral computed tomography within 3 days before their operations. RESULTS: The iodine concentrations of portal vein and hepatic parenchyma during the portal venous phase and the alanine aminotransferase level were found to be independently correlated with the direct portal venous pressure according to stepwise multivariate linear regression analysis (P<0.001, 0.004, and 0.024, respectively). In a receiver operating characteristic analysis, the area under the receiver operating characteristic of iodine concentrations of the portal vein (ICPV) for identifying clinically significant portal hypertension (≥10 mm Hg) was significantly higher than that of iodine concentrations of hepatic parenchyma (ICliver) and the alanine aminotransferase level (0.944, 0.825, and 0.301, respectively). The threshold ICPV of 58.27 yielded a sensitivity of 93.8%, specificity of 69.2%, positive predictive value of 88.2%, and negative predictive value of 81.8%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: ICPV values may be a useful tool in noninvasively assessing the portal venous pressure and identifying clinically significant portal hypertension in liver cirrhosis.

Invasive and non-invasive assessment of portal hypertension.

Portal hypertension is the central driver of complications in patients with chronic liver diseases and cirrhosis. The diagnosis of portal hypertension has important prognostic and clinical implications. In particular, screening for varices in patients with portal hypertension can effectively reduce the morbidity and mortality of variceal bleeding. In this article, we review the invasive and non-invasive methods to assess portal hypertension. Hepatic venous pressure gradient remains the gold standard to measure portal pressure but is invasive and seldom performed outside expert centers and research settings. In recent years, a number of non-invasive tests of fibrosis have shown good correlation with liver histology. They also show promise in identifying patients with portal hypertension and large varices. As a result, the latest Baveno VI consensus guidelines endorse the use of liver stiffness measurement by transient elastography and platelet count as initial assessment to select patients for varices screening. On the other hand, the performance of non-invasive tests in assessing the response to non-selective beta-blockers or transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting is either suboptimal or unclear.

Elastography methods for the non-invasive assessment of portal hypertension.

INTRODUCTION: The gold standard to assess the presence and severity of portal hypertension remains the hepatic vein pressure gradient, however the recent development of non-invasive assessment using elastography techniques offers valuable alternatives. In this review, we discuss the diagnostic accuracy and utility of such techniques in patients with portal hypertension due to cirrhosis. Areas covered: A literature search focused on liver and spleen stiffness measurement with different elastographic techniques for the assessment of the presence and severity of portal hypertension and oesophageal varices in people with chronic liver disease. The combination of elastography with parameters such as platelet count and spleen size is also discussed. Expert commentary: Non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis and portal hypertension is a validated tool for the diagnosis and follow-up of patients. Baveno VI recommended the combination of transient elastography and platelet count for ruling out varices needing treatment in patients with compensated advanced chronic liver disease. Assessment of aetiology specific cut-offs for ruling in and ruling out clinically significant portal hypertension is an unmet clinical need. The incorporation of spleen stiffness measurements in non-invasive algorithms using validated software and improved measuring scales might enhance the non-invasive diagnosis of portal hypertension in the next 5 years.