Cost-effectiveness of testosterone treatment utilising individual patient data from randomised controlled trials in men with low testosterone levels.

BACKGROUND: Testosterone is safe and highly effective in men with organic hypogonadism, but worldwide testosterone prescribing has recently shifted towards middle-aged and older men, mostly with low testosterone related to age, diabetes and obesity, for whom there is less established evidence of clinical safety and benefit. The value of testosterone treatment in middle-aged and older men with low testosterone is yet to be determined. We therefore evaluated the cost-effectiveness of testosterone treatment in such men with low testosterone compared with no treatment. METHODS: A cost-utility analysis comparing testosterone with no treatment was conducted following best practices in decision modelling. A cohort Markov model incorporating relevant care pathways for individuals with hypogonadism was developed for a 10-year-time horizon. Clinical outcomes were obtained from an individual patient meta-analysis of placebo-controlled, double-blind randomised studies. Three starting age categories were defined: 40, 60 and 75 years. Cost utility (quality-adjusted life years) accrued and costs of testosterone treatment, monitoring and cardiovascular complications were compared to estimate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves for selected scenarios. RESULTS: Ten-year excess treatment costs for testosterone compared with non-treatment ranged between £2306 and £3269 per patient. Quality-adjusted life years results depended on the instruments used to measure health utilities. Using Beck depression index-derived quality-adjusted life years data, testosterone was cost-effective (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio <£20,000) for men aged <75 years, regardless of morbidity and mortality sensitivity analyses. Testosterone was not cost-effective in men aged >75 years in models assuming increased morbidity and/or mortality. CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE RESEARCH: Our data suggest that testosterone is cost-effective in men <75 years when Beck depression index-derived quality-adjusted life years data are considered; cost-effectiveness in men >75 years is dependent on cardiovascular safety. However, more robust and longer-term cost-utility data are needed to verify our conclusion.

Symptomatic benefits of testosterone treatment in patient subgroups: a systematic review, individual participant data meta-analysis, and aggregate data meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Testosterone replacement therapy is known to improve sexual function in men younger than 40 years with pathological hypogonadism. However, the extent to which testosterone alleviates sexual dysfunction in older men and men with obesity is unclear, despite the fact that testosterone is being increasingly prescribed to these patient populations. We aimed to evaluate whether subgroups of men with low testosterone derive any symptomatic benefit from testosterone treatment. METHODS: We did a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate characteristics associated with symptomatic benefit of testosterone treatment versus placebo in men aged 18 years and older with a baseline serum total testosterone concentration of less than 12 nmol/L. We searched major electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Science Citation Index, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) and clinical trial registries for reports published in English between Jan 1, 1992, and Aug 27, 2018. Anonymised individual participant data were requested from the investigators of all identified trials. Primary (cardiovascular) outcomes from this analysis have been published previously. In this report, we present the secondary outcomes of sexual function, quality of life, and psychological outcomes at 12 months. We did a one-stage individual participant data meta-analysis with a random-effects linear regression model, and a two-stage meta-analysis integrating individual participant data with aggregated data from studies that did not provide individual participant data. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42018111005. FINDINGS: 9871 citations were identified through database searches. After exclusion of duplicates and publications not meeting inclusion criteria, 225 full texts were assessed for inclusion, of which 109 publications reporting 35 primary studies (with a total 5601 participants) were included. Of these, 17 trials provided individual participant data (3431 participants; median age 67 years [IQR 60-72]; 3281 [97%] of 3380 aged ≥40 years) Compared with placebo, testosterone treatment increased 15-item International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-15) total score (mean difference 5·52 [95% CI 3·95-7·10]; τ2=1·17; n=1412) and IIEF-15 erectile function subscore (2·14 [1·40-2·89]; τ2=0·64; n=1436), reaching the minimal clinically important difference for mild erectile dysfunction. These effects were not found to be dependent on participant age, obesity, presence of diabetes, or baseline serum total testosterone. However, absolute IIEF-15 scores reached during testosterone treatment were subject to thresholds in patient age and baseline serum total testosterone. Testosterone significantly improved Aging Males' Symptoms score, and some 12-item or 36-item Short Form Survey quality of life subscores compared with placebo, but it did not significantly improve psychological symptoms (measured by Beck Depression Inventory). INTERPRETATION: In men aged 40 years or older with baseline serum testosterone of less than 12 nmol/L, short-to-medium-term testosterone treatment could provide clinically meaningful treatment for mild erectile dysfunction, irrespective of patient age, obesity, or degree of low testosterone. However, due to more severe baseline symptoms, the absolute level of sexual function reached during testosterone treatment might be lower in older men and men with obesity. FUNDING: National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Technology Assessment Programme.

Longitudinal Patterns in Testosterone Prescribing After US FDA Safety Communication in 2014.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to describe changes in testosterone prescribing following a 2014 US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) safety communication and how changes varied by physician characteristics. METHODS: Data were extracted from a 20% random sample of Medicare fee-for-service administrative claims data from 2011 through 2019. The sample included 1,544,604 unique male beneficiaries who received evaluation and management (E&M) services from 58,819 unique physicians that prescribed testosterone between 2011 and 2013. Patients were categorized based on presence of coronary artery disease (CAD) and non-age-related hypogonadism. Physician characteristics were identified in the OneKey database and included specialty and affiliations with teaching hospitals, for-profit hospitals, hospitals in integrated delivery networks, and hospitals in the top decile of case mix index. Linear segmented models described how testosterone prescriptions changed following a 2014 FDA safety communication and how changes were associated with physician and organizational characteristics. RESULTS: Among 65,089,560 physician-patient-quarter-year observations, mean (standard deviation) age ranged from 72.16 (5.84) years for observations without CAD or non-age-related hypogonadism to 75.73 (6.92) years with CAD and without non-age-related hypogonadism. Following the safety communication, immediate changes in off-label testosterone prescription levels fell by 0.22 percentage points (pp) (95% confidence interval [CI] -0.33 to -0.11) for patients with CAD and by -0.16 pp (95% CI -0.19 to -0.16) for patients without CAD. A similar change was noticed in on-label prescribing levels. Off-label testosterone prescription quarterly trend, however, increased for patients with CAD and without CAD; on-label testosterone prescription trends declined for both groups. Declines in off-label prescribing were larger when treated by primary care physicians vs. non-primary care physicians, and physicians affiliated with teaching compared to nonteaching hospitals. Physician and organizational characteristics were not associated with changes in on-label prescribing. CONCLUSION: On-label and off-label testosterone therapy declined following the FDA safety communication. Certain physician characteristics were associated with changes in off-label, but not on-label, prescribing.

Assessment of glucose homeostasis in young adult female ß-thalassemia major patients (ß-TM) with acquired hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (AHH) never treated with sex steroids compared to eugonadal ß-TM patients with spontaneous menstrual cycles.

BACKGROUND: Acquired ypogonadotropic hypogonadism (AHH) is the most prevalent endocrine complication in thalassemia major (TM). STUDY DESIGN: Considering the detrimental effect of estrogen deficiency on glucose metabolism, the ICET-A Network promoted a retrospective study on the long-term effects of estrogen deficiency on glucose homeostasis in female ß-TM patients with HH without hormonal replacement therapy (HRT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventeen ß-TM patients with AHH (4 had arrested puberty; Tanners' breast stage 2-3), never treated with sex steroids, and 11 eugonadal ß-TM patients with spontaneous menstrual cycles at the time of referral were studied. A standard 3-h OGTT was performed in the morning, after an overnight fast. Six-point plasma glucose and insulin level determinations, indices of insulin secretion and sensitivity, early-phase insulin insulinogenic index (IGI), HOMA-IR and ß-cell function (HOMA-ß), oral disposition index (oDI), glucose and insulin areas under the OGTT curves were evaluated. RESULTS: Abnormal glucose tolerance (AGT) or diabetes was observed in 15 (88.2%) of 17 patients with AHH and 6 (54.5%) of 11 patients with eumenorrhea. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P: 0.048). However, the group of eugonadal patients was younger compared to AHH patients (26.5 ± 4.8 years vs. 32.6 ± 6.2 years ; P: 0.010). Advanced age,  severity of iron overload, splenectomy, increased ALT levels and reduced IGF-1 levels were the main clinical and laboratory risk factors for glucose dysregulation observed in ß-TM with AHH compared to eugonadal ß-TM patients with spontaneous menstrual cycles. CONCLUSION: These data further support the indication for an annual assessment of OGTT in patients with ß-TM. We believe that a registry of subjects with hypogonadism is necessary for a better understanding of the long-term consequences of this condition and  refining treatment options.

Comparative assessment of outcomes and adverse effects using two different intramuscular testosterone therapy regimens: 100 mg IM weekly or 200 mg IM biweekly.

This study aimed to compare the change in levels of several laboratory values and the development of adverse events using two commonly used intramuscular testosterone therapy regimens. Men were included if they were 18 years or older and received one of the following testosterone therapy regimens: 100 mg intramuscular once weekly or 200 mg intramuscular once every other week. Primary outcomes were relative changes in total testosterone, free testosterone, estradiol, prostate-specific antigen, and hematocrit at 6 months after initiation of testosterone therapy. Secondary outcomes were any significant rises in estradiol, hematocrit, prostate-specific antigen, and any other treatment-related adverse events requiring cessation of testosterone therapy. A total of 263 men were enrolled. In a subanalysis of men who had a baseline hematocrit below 54% before intramuscular testosterone therapy initiation, we found the following: men who received 100 mg weekly injections were significantly less likely to have hematocrit levels rising above 54% (1/102 (1%) vs. 4/51 (8%); p = 0.023). No significant differences were recorded in the increase in total testosterone, free testosterone, prostate-specific antigen, and estradiol levels between both groups. A higher average serum testosterone over the dosing interval seen with the 200 mg regimen appears to be associated with a higher risk of erythrocytosis.

Society for Endocrinology guidelines for testosterone replacement therapy in male hypogonadism.

Male hypogonadism (MH) is a common endocrine disorder. However, uncertainties and variations in its diagnosis and management exist. There are several current guidelines on testosterone replacement therapy that have been driven predominantly by single disciplines. The Society for Endocrinology commissioned this new guideline to provide all care providers with a multidisciplinary approach to treating patients with MH. This guideline has been compiled using expertise from endocrine (medical and nursing), primary care, clinical biochemistry, urology and reproductive medicine practices. These guidelines also provide a patient perspective to help clinicians best manage MH.

Androgen Misuse and Abuse.

Androgens are potent drugs requiring prescription for valid medical indications but are misused for invalid, unproven, or off-label reasons as well as being abused without prescription for illicit nonmedical application for performance or image enhancement. Following discovery and first clinical application of testosterone in the 1930s, commercialization of testosterone and synthetic androgens proliferated in the decades after World War II. It remains among the oldest marketed drugs in therapeutic use, yet after 8 decades of clinical use, the sole unequivocal indication for testosterone remains in replacement therapy for pathological hypogonadism, organic disorders of the male reproductive system. Nevertheless, wider claims assert unproven, unsafe, or implausible benefits for testosterone, mostly representing wishful thinking about rejuvenation. Over recent decades, this created an epidemic of testosterone misuse involving prescription as a revitalizing tonic for anti-aging, sexual dysfunction and/or obesity, where efficacy and safety remains unproven and doubtful. Androgen abuse originated during the Cold War as an epidemic of androgen doping among elite athletes for performance enhancement before the 1980s when it crossed over into the general community to become an endemic variant of drug abuse in sufficiently affluent communities that support an illicit drug industry geared to bodybuilding and aiming to create a hypermasculine body physique and image. This review focuses on the misuse of testosterone, defined as prescribing without valid clinical indications, and abuse of testosterone or synthetic androgens (androgen abuse), defined as the illicit use of androgens without prescription or valid indications, typically by athletes, bodybuilders and others for image-oriented, cosmetic, or occupational reasons.

Pharmacoepidemiology of testosterone: Impact of reimbursement policy on curbing off-label prescribing.

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the impact on testosterone prescribing over 3 years following the 2015 tightening of Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) criteria. DESIGN: Analysis of testosterone prescribing data from PBS and private (non-PBS) sources between 2012 and 2018 covering 2015 change in PBS prescribing criteria. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: New and total PBS testosterone prescriptions estimating usage by quarter analyzed by product type, patient age-group, indication and prescriber type. Total national testosterone prescriptions (private plus PBS) was verified from an independent data supplier (IQVIA). RESULTS: PBS usage peaked in 2014 declining by 30% in 2017-8 with PBS prescribing covering a fall from 97.6% by usage in 2014 to 74% in 2017-18 of all testosterone prescribing. The tighter 2015 PBS restrictions sustained the selective reduction in GP initiation of prescriptions for middle-aged men without pathological hypogonadism whereas specialist initiations and prescription for adult hypogonadism or pediatric/prepubertal indications were largely unaffected. CONCLUSIONS: The tightening of PBS criteria from 1 April 2015 to curb off-label prescribing remained effective and selective over 3 years yet total national testosterone prescribing continued with little change, reflecting a shift to private prescriptions. The continuation of off-label testosterone prescribing for unproven indications suggests that long-term androgen dependence is created in men without pathological hypogonadism who commence testosterone. This highlights the need to avoid prescribing testosterone to men without pathological hypogonadism in the absence of sound evidence of efficacy and safety, the latter including the little unrecognized risks of long-term androgen dependency when trying to quit.

The prevalence and demographic determinants of blood donors receiving testosterone replacement therapy at a large USA blood service organization.

BACKGROUND: Blood donors receiving testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) often require therapeutic phlebotomy due to erythrocytosis. Red blood cells (RBCs) donated by eligible TRT donors are approved for collection and transfusion. This study was aimed at defining the prevalence and demographic determinants of TRT donors at a large USA blood service organization. STUDY DESIGN: Donation data from TRT donors and matched controls was collected from a de-identified electronic donor database across 16 blood centers in 2017-2018. Demographic determinants included race, sex, age, hemoglobin (Hb), body mass index (BMI), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and the frequency of donations in the 2-year period. RESULTS: TRT donors comprised 1.6% of the donor population and produced 2.2% of RBC units during 2018. TRT donors were likely to be middle-aged white or Hispanic men, with high prevalence of obesity (50.8% of TRT donors had BMI ≥30 kg/m2 compared with 36.2% in controls) and intensive donation frequency (1 to 29 donations in 2 years vs. 1 to 12 in controls). TRT donors had significantly (p < 0.0001) higher MAP and Hb compared with controls (MAP 99.9 ± 9.81 vs. 96.5 ± 10.1 mmHg; Hb 17.8 ± 1.44 vs. 15.6 ± 1.37 g/dL). One year of donations was associated with significant decreases in MAP and Hb for TRT donors. CONCLUSIONS: TRT is associated with high prevalence of erythrocytosis and obesity that may explain the intensive donation frequency, high MAP, and Hb. Frequent phlebotomies had a moderately positive effect on blood pressure and Hb levels. Potential implications of TRT on the quality of the RBC products require further evaluation.

Trends and Patterns of Testosterone Therapy among U.S. Male Medicare Beneficiaries, 1999 to 2014.

PURPOSE: We explored the Medicare database (1999 to 2014) to provide a comprehensive assessment of testosterone therapy patterns in the older U.S. male population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We estimated annual age-standardized incidence (new users) and prevalence (existing users) of testosterone therapy according to demographic characteristics, comorbidities and potential indications. RESULTS: There were 392,698 incident testosterone therapy users during 88 million person-years. Testosterone therapy users were predominantly younger, white nonHispanic, and located in South and West U.S. Census regions. On average testosterone therapy use increased dramatically during 2007 to 2014 (average annual percent change 15.5%), despite a decrease in 2014. In 2014 the most common recorded potential indications for any testosterone therapy were hypogonadism (48%), fatigue (18%), erectile dysfunction (15%), depression (4%) and psychosexual dysfunction (1%). Laboratory tests to measure circulating testosterone concentrations for testosterone therapy were infrequent with 35% having had at least 1 testosterone test in the 120 days preceding testosterone therapy, 4% the recommended 2 pre-testosterone therapy tests, and 16% at least 1 pre-testosterone therapy test and at least 1 post-testosterone therapy test. CONCLUSIONS: Testosterone therapy remains common in the older U.S. male population, despite a recent decrease. Although testosterone therapy prescriptions are predominantly for hypogonadism, a substantial proportion appear to be for less specific conditions. Testosterone tests among men prescribed testosterone therapy appear to be infrequent.

Testosterone Therapy in Relation to Prostate Cancer in a U.S. Commercial Insurance Claims Database.

BACKGROUND: We conducted a study to assess whether testosterone therapy (TT) alters prostate cancer risk using a large U.S. commercial insurance research database. METHODS: From the HealthCore Integrated Research Database (HIRD), we selected men ages 30 years or greater who were new users of TT during 2007 to 2015. We selected two comparison groups: (i) unexposed (matched 10:1) and (ii) new users of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor (PDE5i). Incident prostate cancer was defined as diagnosis of prostate cancer within 4 weeks following prostate biopsy. Propensity scores and inverse probability of treatment weights were used in Poisson regression models to estimate adjusted incidence rates, incidence rate ratios (IRR), and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Subgroup analyses included stratification by prostate cancer screening, hypogonadism, and follow-up time. RESULTS: The adjusted prostate cancer IRR was 0.77 (95% CI, 0.68-0.86) when comparing TT with the unexposed group and 0.85 (95% CI, 0.79-0.91) in comparison with the PDE5i group. Inverse associations between TT and prostate cancer were observed in a majority of subgroup analyses, although in both comparisons estimates generally attenuated with increasing time following initial exposure. Among TT users, duration of exposure was not associated with prostate cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Men who received TT did not have a higher rate of prostate cancer compared with the unexposed or PDE5i comparison groups. The inverse association between TT and prostate cancer could be the result of residual confounding, contraindication bias, or undefined biological effect. IMPACT: This study suggests that limited TT exposure does not increase risk of prostate cancer in the short term.

Recurrent Rathke's Cleft Cysts: Incidence and Surgical Management in a Tertiary Pituitary Center over 2 Decades.

BACKGROUND: Limited data exist pertaining to outcomes following surgery for recurrent Rathke's cleft cysts (RCC). OBJECTIVE: To determine treatment outcomes in patients undergoing reoperation for recurrent or residual RCCs. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 112 consecutive RCC operations in 109 patients between 1995 and 2017 was conducted. RESULTS: Eighteen patients underwent 21 RCC reoperations with a mean follow-up of 58 mo. Patient symptoms prior to reoperation included headaches (14, 66.7%) and vision loss (12, 57.1%). Thirteen of 18 patients (72.2%) required hormone supplementation prior to reoperation including 5 with diabetes insipidus (DI). Mean RCC diameter was 16 mm and 76% had suprasellar extension. Compared to index RCC cases, intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak repair was more common in reoperation cases (15/21, 71% vs 43/91, 47%, P = .05). There was 1 carotid artery injury without neurological sequelae, and 2 postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks (9.5%). Rates of transient hyponatremia (3/10, 30% vs 4/91, 4.4%, P = .04) and transient DI (5/10, 50% vs 17/91, 18.7%, P = .04) were higher in the reoperation vs index group. Improved headaches and vision were reported in 4/12 (33%) and 8/12 (61.5%) of RCC reoperation patients, respectively. Two patients developed new permanent DI. A higher proportion of reoperation patients had RCC squamous metaplasia (24% vs 5.4%, P = .02) or wall inflammation (42.9% vs 2.2%, P < .001) on pathological examination. CONCLUSION: Reoperation for RCCs is generally safe at tertiary pituitary centers and often results in improved vision. Hypopituitarism is less likely to improve following reoperation for recurrent RCCs. Several histopathological features may help characterize "atypical RCCs" with a higher likelihood of recurrence/progression.

Topical Testosterone Therapy Adherence and Outcomes Among Men With Primary or Secondary Hypogonadism.

BACKGROUND: Men with primary or secondary hypogonadism (HG) prescribed testosterone therapy (TTh) who terminate treatment early might not obtain the benefit of symptom relief. AIM: To estimate adherence to topical TTh and to compare baseline characteristics and follow-up outcomes between adherent and non-adherent patients in a population of commercially insured US men with primary or secondary HG. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of adult men with primary or secondary HG and initiating topical TTh from 2007 through 2014, with continuous coverage during 12-month baseline and follow-up periods, was identified from a large US health plan. Clinical conditions were assessed using International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification codes. Adherence to initial topical TTh was defined as proportion of days covered of at least 80%. Characteristics and outcomes were compared across adherent and non-adherent patients. OUTCOMES: Adherence to topical TTh, occurrence of HG-related clinical outcomes, and total health care costs. RESULTS: We identified 3,184 topical TTh initiators (mean age = 49 years), of whom 17% (n = 538) were adherent at 12 months. Factors positively associated with adherence included prescribing by specialists, a lower prevalence of certain comorbidities at baseline, residence in the Northeast, and an earlier start year of the topical TTh prescription. Adherence to topical TTh was associated with lower odds of having HG-associated clinical conditions (composite measure) over 12-month follow-up. In the subset of patients with available laboratory results, adherent patients had greater increases in testosterone levels compared with non-adherent patients. Increased pharmacy costs for adherent patients were partly offset by decreases in medical costs. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Adherence to topical testosterone is low but associated with positive outcomes, demonstrating the need for future efforts to focus on improving adherence in this population. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: Strengths of this study include the large number of analyzed patients and the routine care (rather than interventional trial) setting, which maximizes generalizability within the source population. Limitations are primarily a result of reliance on medical claims data, which lack clinical context and are subject to potential coding errors. Certain factors of potential importance for adherence, such as patient and provider preferences, were not available in the dataset. The study analyzed commercially insured US patients and our ability to generalize these results to the entire US population or other countries might be limited. CONCLUSION: Study findings provide further evidence for suboptimal topical TTh adherence among men treated for primary or secondary HG. Adherence is associated with greater improvement in total testosterone laboratory values and might be associated with a lower likelihood of having certain HG-related conditions. Grabner M, Hepp Z, Raval A, et al. Topical Testosterone Therapy Adherence and Outcomes Among Men With Primary or Secondary Hypogonadism. J Sex Med 2018;15:148-158.

Marketing and Testosterone Treatment in the USA: A Systematic Review.

CONTEXT: Testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) is currently approved by the Food and Drug Administration only for classic hypogonadism, although off-label indications have resulted in a dramatic expansion in prescriptions in the USA. Marketing may significantly affect prescriber behavior. OBJECTIVE: To systematically review all available evidence on marketing and TRT in the USA. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched up to July 2017 for all relevant publications reporting on assessments of the TRT market size, economic costs associated with hypogonadism, trends in TRT prescriptions, drug discontinuation rates, and advertising and sales efforts in the USA. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Twenty retrospective studies were included in the final analysis. The market size for hypogonadism constitutes 5.6-76.8% of men in the USA, with the lower end of the range representing the strictest criteria for diagnosis. Men with a diagnosis of hypogonadism consume $14 118 in direct and indirect costs to the payer. Over the last 2 decades, TRT prescriptions have increased between 1.8- and 4-fold. After 1 yr, 80-85% of men discontinue TRT. There is an association between direct-to-consumer advertising and testosterone testing, TRT prescriptions, and TRT without testosterone testing. There is a high prevalence of misinformation on Internet advertising. CONCLUSIONS: Off-label indications have driven the dramatic expansion of TRT prescriptions over the last 2 decades. Direct-to-consumer advertising poses a unique challenge in the USA. Overtreatment can be avoided by applying strict diagnostic criteria for hypogonadism, which limits the addressable market for TRT. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this report, we reviewed the relationship between marketing and testosterone therapy in the USA. We found that many patients are prescribed testosterone without an appropriate diagnosis of hypogonadism, which may be related to the marketing efforts for off-label prescribing.

Endocrine Society of Australia position statement on male hypogonadism (part 1): assessment and indications for testosterone therapy.

INTRODUCTION: This article, Part 1 of the Endocrine Society of Australia's position statement on male hypogonadism, focuses on assessment of male hypogonadism, including the indications for testosterone therapy. (Part 2 will deal with treatment and therapeutic considerations.) MAIN RECOMMENDATIONS: Key points and recommendations are:Pathological hypogonadism arises due to diseases of the hypothalamus or pituitary gland (hypogonadotropic hypogonadism) or testes (hypergonadotropic hypogonadism). It is a clinical diagnosis with a pathological basis, confirmed by hormone assays.Hormonal assessment is based on measurement of circulating testosterone, luteinising hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) concentrations. Measurement of sex hormone-binding globulin levels can be informative, but use of calculated free testosterone is not recommended for clinical decision making.Testosterone replacement therapy is warranted in men with pathological hypogonadism, regardless of age.Currently, there are limited data from high-quality randomised controlled trials with clinically meaningful outcomes to justify testosterone treatment in older men, usually with chronic disease, who have low circulating testosterone levels but without hypothalamic, pituitary or testicular disease.Obesity, metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes are associated with lowering of circulating testosterone level, but without elevation of LH and FSH levels. Whether these are non-specific consequences of non-reproductive disorders or a correctable deficiency state is unknown, but clear evidence for efficacy and safety of testosterone therapy in this setting is lacking.Glucocorticoid and opioid use is associated with possibly reversible reductions in circulating testosterone level, without elevation of LH and FSH levels. Where continuation of glucocorticoid or opioid therapy is necessary, review by an endocrinologist may be warranted.Changes in management as result of the position statement: Men with pathological hypogonadism should be identified and considered for testosterone therapy, while further research is needed to clarify whether there is a role for testosterone in these other settings.

Management of Hypogonadism in Cardiovascular Patients: What Are the Implications of Testosterone Therapy on Cardiovascular Morbidity?

Testosterone replacement therapy is recommended for men with clinical androgen deficiency with decades of evidence supporting its use for treatment of sexual, physical, and psychological consequences of male hypogonadism. In this updated review, the authors discuss the implications of testosterone deficiency and conflicting evidence regarding testosterone replacement therapy and its effects on the cardiovascular system. Based on mounting evidence, the authors conclude that testosterone therapy can be safely considered in men with appropriately diagnosed clinical androgen deficiency and concurrent cardiovascular risk factors and even manifest cardiovascular disease after a thorough discussion of potential risks and with guideline-recommended safety monitoring.