Do pathologists agree with each other on the histological assessment of pT1b oesophageal adenocarcinoma?

Background: In early (T1) oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC), the histological profile of an endoscopic resection specimen plays a pivotal role in the prediction of lymph node metastasis and the potential need for oesophagectomy with lymphadenectomy. Objective: To evaluate the inter-observer agreement of the histological assessment of submucosal (pT1b) OAC. Methods: Surgical and endoscopic resection specimens with pT1b OAC were independently reviewed by three gastrointestinal pathologists. Agreement was determined by intraclass correlation coefficient for continuous variables, and Fleiss' kappa (κ) for categorical variables. Bland-Altman plots of the submucosal invasion depth were made. Results: Eighty-five resection specimens with pT1b OAC were evaluated. The agreement was good for differentiation grade (κ=0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.68-0.87), excellent for lymphovascular invasion (κ=0.88, 95% CI 0.76-1.00) and moderate for submucosal invasion depth using the Paris and Pragmatic classifications (κ=0.60, 95% CI 0.49-0.72 and κ=0.42, 95% CI 0.33-0.51, respectively). Systematic mean differences between pathologists were detected for the measurement of submucosal invasion depth, ranging from 297 µm to 602 µm. Conclusions: A substantial discordance was found between pathologists for the measurement of submucosal invasion depth in pT1b OAC. Differences may lead to an over- or underestimation of the lymph node metastasis risk, with grave implications for the treatment strategy. Review by a second gastrointestinal pathologist is recommended to improve differentiating between a favourable and an unfavourable histological profile.

External quality assessment for acid fast bacilli smear microscopy in eastern part of Ethiopia.

BACKGROUND: External quality assessment (EQA) of sputum smear microscopy is essential and indispensable component of any tuberculosis program. This study assessed the EQA of acid fast bacilli (AFB) smear microscopy through onsite evaluation, blinded rechecking and panel test. A one year study was conducted on eight health institution laboratories from December 2011 to December 2012. Onsite evaluation, blinded rechecking and panel tests were used to collect data. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 16. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and proportions of false readings were calculated. The level of agreement was measured using Kappa (κ) value. RESULTS: Problems observed during onsite evaluation include shortages of materials, disinfectant, and poor storage and working condition. A total of 578 slides were collected for blinded rechecking, of which 102 (17.6%) were reported as positive by peripheral laboratories. The panel test revealed an overall error of 17 (25.25%) of which 14 (17.5%) were minor errors [low false negative 6 (7.5%) and low false positive 8 (10%)], and 3 (3.75%) were major errors (high false positive). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) of the peripheral laboratories were 83.5, 97.8, 91.7, and 95.7, respectively. The false readings at the peripheral laboratories were 32 (5.5%). Agreement on reading the slides was observed on 546 (94.5%) slides (K = 0.84, SE = 0.054). CONCLUSIONS: Lack of reagents, supplies, favorable working environment and AFB related technical problems were identified in the peripheral laboratories. High false negative error was found to be the predominant major error. A continuous and strong EQA scheme should be implemented to avoid reporting errors and produce quality sputum results.

Design and validation of the biliary atresia research consortium histologic assessment system for cholestasis in infancy.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Pathologists participating in the National Institutes of Health-sponsored Biliary Atresia Research Consortium (BARC) developed and then evaluated a standardized system for histologic reporting of liver biopsies from infants with cholestasis. METHODS: A set of 97 anonymous liver biopsy samples was sent to 10 pathologists at BARC centers. A semiquantitative scoring system that had 16 histologic features was developed and then used by the pathologists, who had no knowledge of clinical history, imaging results, or laboratory data. Interobserver agreement was evaluated statistically. Agreement on scoring of each feature and on the pathologists' diagnosis, compared with the final clinical diagnosis, was evaluated by using weighted kappa statistics. RESULTS: There was moderate to substantial interobserver agreement in identification of bile plugs in ducts, giant-cell transformation, extramedullary hematopoiesis, and bile duct proliferation. The pathologists' diagnosis of obstruction in clinically proven cases of biliary atresia (BA) ranged from 79%-98%, with a positive predictive value of 90.7%. Histologic features that best predicted BA, on the basis of logistic regression, included bile duct proliferation, portal fibrosis, and absence of sinusoidal fibrosis (each P<.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The BARC histologic assessment system identified features of liver biopsies from cholestatic infants, with good interobserver agreement, that might be used in diagnosis and determination of prognosis. The system diagnosed BA with a high level of sensitivity and identified infants with biliary obstruction with reasonable interobserver agreement. However, distinguishing between BA and disorders such as total parenteral nutrition-associated liver disease and alpha(1)-antitrypsin deficiency is not possible without adequate clinical information.

Histologic assessment of Helicobacter pylori status after therapy: comparison of Giemsa, Diff-Quik, and Genta stains.

To compare the Giemsa, Diff-Quik, and Genta stains for detection of Helicobacter pylori in gastric biopsy specimens, we stained, coded, and randomized slides, which were then independently reviewed by two pathologists and one trainee. H. pylori was graded from 0 (absent) to 5 (maximal intensity). Negative cases were from recently cured patients to ensure that a background of chronic inflammation was present. The time required to complete the evaluation was tabulated. The pathologists interpreted 72 H. pylori-negative slides, of which 1 (1.3%), 2 (3%), and 3 (4%) were scored positive (each with the score of 1) with Diff-Quik, Genta, and Giemsa stains, respectively (P = ns). Of the 128 H. pylori-positive slides, 5 (4%) had false-negative results with Diff-Quik, 8 with Genta (6%), and 14 with Giemsa stains( 11%). No Grade 2 slides were missed by Genta or Diff-Quik stains, but 3 of 20 were missed by Giemsa stain. The combination of hematoxylin and eosin and Diff-Quik provides accuracy similar to that of the Genta stain but requires more processing time. No stain was excellent after therapy for detecting one or two bacteria per slide; this finding emphasizes the need for obtaining multiple biopsy specimen to exclude failure of H. pylori therapy.