Possible modification of BRSK1 on the risk of alkylating chemotherapy-related reduced ovarian function.

STUDY QUESTION: Do genetic variations in the DNA damage response pathway modify the adverse effect of alkylating agents on ovarian function in female childhood cancer survivors (CCS)? SUMMARY ANSWER: Female CCS carrying a common BR serine/threonine kinase 1 (BRSK1) gene variant appear to be at 2.5-fold increased odds of reduced ovarian function after treatment with high doses of alkylating chemotherapy. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Female CCS show large inter-individual variability in the impact of DNA-damaging alkylating chemotherapy, given as treatment of childhood cancer, on adult ovarian function. Genetic variants in DNA repair genes affecting ovarian function might explain this variability. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: CCS for the discovery cohort were identified from the Dutch Childhood Oncology Group (DCOG) LATER VEVO-study, a multi-centre retrospective cohort study evaluating fertility, ovarian reserve and risk of premature menopause among adult female 5-year survivors of childhood cancer. Female 5-year CCS, diagnosed with cancer and treated with chemotherapy before the age of 25 years, and aged 18 years or older at time of study were enrolled in the current study. Results from the discovery Dutch DCOG-LATER VEVO cohort (n = 285) were validated in the pan-European PanCareLIFE (n = 465) and the USA-based St. Jude Lifetime Cohort (n = 391). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: To evaluate ovarian function, anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels were assessed in both the discovery cohort and the replication cohorts. Using additive genetic models in linear and logistic regression, five genetic variants involved in DNA damage response were analysed in relation to cyclophosphamide equivalent dose (CED) score and their impact on ovarian function. Results were then examined using fixed-effect meta-analysis. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Meta-analysis across the three independent cohorts showed a significant interaction effect (P = 3.0 × 10-4) between rs11668344 of BRSK1 (allele frequency = 0.34) among CCS treated with high-dose alkylating agents (CED score ≥8000 mg/m2), resulting in a 2.5-fold increased odds of a reduced ovarian function (lowest AMH tertile) for CCS carrying one G allele compared to CCS without this allele (odds ratio genotype AA: 2.01 vs AG: 5.00). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: While low AMH levels can also identify poor responders in assisted reproductive technology, it needs to be emphasized that AMH remains a surrogate marker of ovarian function. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Further research, validating our findings and identifying additional risk-contributing genetic variants, may enable individualized counselling regarding treatment-related risks and necessity of fertility preservation procedures in girls with cancer. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This work was supported by the PanCareLIFE project that has received funding from the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration under grant agreement no 602030. In addition, the DCOG-LATER VEVO study was funded by the Dutch Cancer Society (Grant no. VU 2006-3622) and by the Children Cancer Free Foundation (Project no. 20) and the St Jude Lifetime cohort study by NCI U01 CA195547. The authors declare no competing interests. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Assessment of Anti-Mullerian Hormone and Anti-Mullerian Hormone Type II Receptor Variants in Women with Repeated Implantation Failures.

Repeated implantation failure (RIF) is a common endocrine disease that causes female infertility and the etiology is unknown. The abnormal expression of key proteins and hormones at the maternal-fetal interface affected the maternal-fetal communication and leads to adverse pregnancy outcomes. The expression of anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) and AMH receptor II (AMHRII) was observed in the endometrium. This study aimed to investigate the expression of AMH and AMHRII at the human endometrium, decidual tissue, and blastocyst. Furthermore, the expression of AMH and AMHRII were examined in the RIF patients using immunohistochemistry and quantitative real-time PCR to test the AMHRII expression. The results demonstrated that AMH and AMHRII were present in healthy endometrium and AMHRII was highly expressed in mid-luteal phase. In addition, AMHRII expression was detected throughout the pregnancy and AMHRII's highest expression was in the second trimester. AMHRII was expressed in the blastocysts; however, AMH was not observed. The positive expression rate for AMHRII was significantly higher in the endometrium from RIF. Estrogen receptor (ER), insulin-like growth factor binding protein 1(IGFBP1), and prolactin (PRL) were significantly less expressed in RIF with high expression of AMHRII. The apoptosis was significantly higher in patients with high expression of AMHRII than in patients with normal expression of AMHRII. Our data suggests that AMHRII had an effect on RIF via the AMH and AMHRII signaling pathway. It participated in the development of RIF by interfering with endometrial decidualization and apoptosis.

A novel mathematical model of true ovarian reserve assessment based on predicted probability of poor ovarian response: a retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: To establish a mathematical model for assessing the true ovarian reserve based on the predicted probability of poor ovarian response (POR). METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, a total of 1523 GnRH-antagonist cycles in 2017 were firstly analyzed. The ovarian responses were calculated based on the number of retrieved oocytes. The continuous variables were converted into categorical variables according to cutoff values generated by the decision tree method. The optimal model was identified using forward stepwise multiple logistic regression with 5-fold cross-validation and further verified its performances using outer validation data. RESULTS: The predictors in our model were anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), antral follicle counts (AFC), basal follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), and age, in order of their significance, named AAFA model. The AUC, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of AAFA model in inner validation and outer validation data were 0.861 and 0.850, 0.603 and 0.519, 0.917 and 0.930, 0.655 and 0.570, and 0.899 and 0.915. Ovarian reserve of 16 subgroups was further ranked according to the predicted probability of POR and further divided into 4 groups of A-D using clustering analysis. The incidence of POR in the four groups was 0.038 (0.030-0.046), 0.139 (0.101-0.177), 0.362 (0.308-0.415), and 0.571 (0.525-0.616), respectively. The order of ovarian reserve from adequate to poor followed the order of A to D. CONCLUSION: We have established an easy applicable AAFA model for assessing true ovarian reserve and may have important implications in both infertile women and general reproductive women in Chinese or Asian population.

Ovarian aging: latest thoughts on assessment and management.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In the past few decades, women have been intentionally delaying pregnancy and ovarian aging has become one of the most detrimental factors of pregnancy achievement. This review will discuss contemporary methods of ovarian aging assessment and present an overview of current management strategies. RECENT FINDINGS: Antimullerian hormone (AMH) and antral follicle count (AFC) seem to be the most reliable predictors of ovarian aging appraisal. Nevertheless, they have not been shown to predict pregnancy achievement in assisted reproduction. Heritability has a high impact on ovarian aging. Employing several genetic approaches, it is now being widely investigated, but the task is far from being accomplished. Although multivariate models have not been proven to be superior to AFC, new data support the notion that chronological age and genetic markers inclusion may increase their reliability. Several strategies have been suggested to treat ovarian aging in assisted reproductive technology (ART) settings. None of the stimulation protocol manipulations have been found to be advantageous and individualization of treatment is still recommended. Ovarian priming by different androgen preparations has been shown to be promising but more randomized controlled trials are needed to support these findings. Except for oocyte donation other ART strategies have not shown a convincing benefit for ovarian aging. The new development of oocyte vitrification may well introduce opportunities for fertility preservation to women at risk of ovarian aging. SUMMARY: Proper assessment and detection of ovarian aging, employing current or developing predictors of ovarian reserve, especially genetic tests, may enable health providers to recommend, at appropriate biological time, early pregnancy achievement or fertility preservation in women at risk.