Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 669
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 23(10): 2046-2056, 2021 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34109562

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To report healthcare resource use and associated costs in controlled versus uncontrolled carcinoid syndrome (CS) in patients with neuroendocrine tumours. METHODS: A cross-sectional, non-interventional multicentre study was conducted with retrospective data analysis. Resource use was compared between two patient groups: those with controlled CS (> 12 months with no uncontrolled CS episodes) and uncontrolled CS (< 12 months since last uncontrolled episode). Patients were matched for age, sex, and origin and grade of tumour. When no matching patients were available, data from deceased patients were used. Information on healthcare resource use came from review of medical records, patient history and physician reports. Working capacity was assessed using the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment General Health questionnaire. RESULTS: Twenty-six university hospitals in Spain participated, between July 2017 and April 2018. 137 patients were enrolled; 104 were analysed (2 groups of 52). Patients with uncontrolled CS had 10 times more emergency department (ED) visits (mean 1.0 vs 0.10 visits; P = 0.0167), were more likely to have a hospital admission (40.4% vs 19.2%; P = 0.0116) and had longer hospital stays (mean 7.87 vs 2.10 days; P = 0.0178) than those with controlled CS. This corresponded to higher annual hospitalisation costs (mean €5511.59 vs €1457.22; P = 0.028) and ED costs (€161.25 vs €14.85; P = 0.0236). The mean annual total healthcare costs were 60.0% higher in patients with uncontrolled than controlled CS (P = NS). CONCLUSION: This study quantifies higher health resource use, and higher hospitalisation and ED costs in patients with uncontrolled CS. Better control of CS may result 3in lower medical costs.


Assuntos
Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde/economia , Síndrome do Carcinoide Maligno/economia , Absenteísmo , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos Transversais , Custos Diretos de Serviços , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/economia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Universitários/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Síndrome do Carcinoide Maligno/patologia , Síndrome do Carcinoide Maligno/terapia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tumores Neuroendócrinos/economia , Tumores Neuroendócrinos/patologia , Tumores Neuroendócrinos/terapia , Presenteísmo/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Espanha , Trabalho/estatística & dados numéricos
3.
J Perinat Med ; 49(7): 818-829, 2021 Sep 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33827151

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: In Germany, cesarean section (CS) rates more than doubled within the past two decades. For analysis, auditing and inter-hospital comparison, the 10-Group Classification System (TGCS) is recommended. We used the TGCS to analyze CS rates in two German hospitals of different levels of care. METHODS: From October 2017 to September 2018, data were prospectively collected. Unit A is a level three university hospital, unit B a level one district hospital. The German birth registry was used for comparison with national data. We performed two-sample Z tests and bootstrapping to compare aggregated (unit A + B) with national data and unit A with unit B. RESULTS: In both datasets (national data and aggregated data unit A + B), Robson group (RG) 5 was the largest contributor to the overall CS rate. Compared to national data, group sizes in RG 1 and 3 were significantly smaller in the units under investigation, RG 8 and 10 significantly larger. Total CS rates between the two units differed (40.7 vs. 28.4%, p<0.001). The CS rate in RG 5 and RG 10 was different (p<0.01 for both). The most relative frequent RG in both units consisted of group 5, followed by group 10 and 2a. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis allowed us to explain different CS rates with differences in the study population and with differences in the clinical practice. These results serve as a starting point for audits, inter-hospital comparisons and for interventions aiming to reduce CS rates.


Assuntos
Cesárea/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais de Distrito/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Universitários/estatística & dados numéricos , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Benchmarking , Cesárea/normas , Auditoria Clínica , Feminino , Alemanha , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais de Distrito/normas , Hospitais Universitários/normas , Humanos , Padrões de Prática Médica/normas , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Gravidez , Estudos Prospectivos
4.
Transfusion ; 61(7): 2019-2024, 2021 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33745158

RESUMO

Disparities are prevalent in numerous areas of healthcare. We sought to investigate whether there were racial/ethnic disparities among pregnant women with the most severe form of alloimmunization who require intrauterine transfusions (IUT). We reviewed patients who underwent IUT for alloimmunization at a single fetal treatment center between 2015 and 2020. This "IUT cohort" was compared to an "Alloimmunization cohort": patients seen at our institution with a diagnosis of alloimmunization during pregnancy, who did not receive IUT. We collected maternal demographics including self-identified race/ethnicity and primary language, transfusion, and antibody characteristics. The cohorts were compared using unpaired t-tests, Mann-Whitney tests, and Fischer's exact tests, as appropriate. The IUT cohort included 43 patients and the alloimmunization cohort included 1049 patients. Compared to the alloimmunization cohort, there were significantly more patients of Latina descent in the IUT cohort (23.3% vs. 3.4%, p < .0001), and more non-English speakers (18.6% vs. 4.6%, p = .001). Twenty-one percent (9/43) of patients had immigrated to the United States, all of whom had pregnancies or miscarriages in their country of origin. A third of patients had new antibodies identified on serial screens during the current pregnancy. Significantly more women of Latina ethnicity and non-English speakers required IUTs compared to the cohort of women with alloimmunization. Insufficient access to care prior to arriving in the United States and among racial and ethnic minorities in the United States may contribute to these findings. Providers should be cognizant of potential, racial, and ethnic inequalities among women receiving intrauterine transfusions.


Assuntos
Transfusão de Sangue Intrauterina/estatística & dados numéricos , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/etnologia , Histocompatibilidade Materno-Fetal/imunologia , Troca Materno-Fetal/imunologia , Aborto Espontâneo/etnologia , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Conjuntos de Dados como Assunto , Emigrantes e Imigrantes/estatística & dados numéricos , Etnicidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hispânico ou Latino/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Universitários/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Imunoglobulina G/imunologia , Isoanticorpos/sangue , Isoanticorpos/imunologia , Paridade , Gravidez , Grupos Raciais/estatística & dados numéricos , Imunoglobulina rho(D)/sangue , São Francisco , Classe Social
5.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand ; 65(6): 755-760, 2021 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33619727

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The initial wave of the Covid-19 pandemic has hit Italy, and Lombardy in particular, with violence, forcing to reshape all hospitals' activities; this happened even in pediatric hospitals, although the young population seemed initially spared from the disease. "Vittore Buzzi" Children's Hospital, which is a pediatric/maternal hospital located in Milan (Lombardy Region), had to stop elective procedures-with the exception of urgent/emergent ones-between February and May 2020 to leave space and resources to adults' care. We describe the challenges of reshaping the hospital's identity and structure, and restarting pediatric surgery and anesthesia, from May on, in the most hit area of the world, with the purpose to avoid and contain infections. Both patients and caregivers admitted to hospital have been tested for Sars-CoV-2 in every case. METHODS: Observational cohort study via review of clinical charts of patients undergoing surgery between 16th May and 30th September 2020, together with SARS-CoV -2 RT-PCR testing outcomes, and comparison to same period surgeries in 2019. RESULTS: An increase of approximately 70% in pediatric surgeries (OR 1.68 [1.33-2.13], P < .001) and a higher increase in the number of surgeries were reported (OR 1.75 (1.43-2.15), P < .001). Considering only urgent procedures, a significant difference in the distribution of the type of surgery was observed (Chi-squared P-value < .001). Sars-CoV-2-positive patients have been 0.8% of total number; 14% of these was discovered through caregiver's positivity. CONCLUSION: We describe our pathway for safe pediatric surgery and anesthesia and the importance of testing both patient and caregiver.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Anestesia/organização & administração , Agendamento de Consultas , Teste de Ácido Nucleico para COVID-19 , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Hospitais Pediátricos/organização & administração , Hospitais Universitários/organização & administração , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Centro Cirúrgico Hospitalar/organização & administração , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/estatística & dados numéricos , Centros de Atenção Terciária/organização & administração , Adolescente , Teste de Ácido Nucleico para COVID-19/estatística & dados numéricos , Cuidadores , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos de Coortes , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/estatística & dados numéricos , Emergências/epidemiologia , Feminino , Número de Leitos em Hospital/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Pediátricos/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Universitários/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Urbanos/organização & administração , Hospitais Urbanos/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Transmissão de Doença Infecciosa do Paciente para o Profissional/prevenção & controle , Itália/epidemiologia , Masculino , Nasofaringe/virologia , Pacientes , SARS-CoV-2/isolamento & purificação , Avaliação de Sintomas , Centros de Atenção Terciária/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto Jovem
6.
JAMA Netw Open ; 4(2): e2036297, 2021 02 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33533928

RESUMO

Importance: Given that 40% of hand function is achieved with the thumb, replantation of traumatic thumb injuries is associated with substantial quality-of-life benefits. However, fewer replantations are being performed annually in the US, which has been associated with less surgical expertise and increased risk of future replantation failures. Thus, understanding how interfacility transfers and hospital characteristics are associated with outcomes warrants further investigation. Objective: To assess the association of interfacility transfer, patient characteristics, and hospital factors with thumb replantation attempts and success. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used data from the US National Trauma Data Bank from 2009 to 2016 for adult patients with isolated traumatic thumb amputation injury who underwent revision amputation or replantation. Data analysis was performed from May 4, 2020, to July 20, 2020. Exposures: Interfacility transfer, defined as transfer of a patient from 1 hospital to another to obtain care for traumatic thumb amputation. Main Outcomes and Measures: Replantation attempt and replantation success, defined as having undergone a replantation without a subsequent revision amputation during the same hospitalization. Multilevel logistic regression models were used to assess the associations of interfacility transfer, patient characteristics, and hospital factors with replantation outcomes. Results: Of 3670 patients included in this analysis, 3307 (90.1%) were male and 2713 (73.9%) were White; the mean (SD) age was 45.8 (16.5) years. A total of 1881 patients (51.2%) were transferred to another hospital; most of these patients were male (1720 [91.4%]) and White (1420 [75.5%]). After controlling for patient and hospital characteristics, uninsured patients were less likely to have thumb replantation attempted (odds ratio [OR], 0.61; 95% CI, 0.47-0.78) or a successful replantation (OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.49-0.84). Interfacility transfer was associated with increased odds of replantation attempt (OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.13-1.59), with 13% of the variation at the hospital level. Interfacility transfer was also associated with increased replantation success (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.03-1.47), with 14% of variation at the hospital level. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study, interfacility transfer and particularly hospital-level variation were associated with increased thumb replantation attempts and successes. These findings suggest a need for creating policies that incentivize hospitals with replantation expertise to provide treatment for traumatic thumb amputations, including promotion of centralization of replantation care.


Assuntos
Amputação Traumática/cirurgia , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Transferência de Pacientes/estatística & dados numéricos , Reimplante , Polegar/lesões , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Certificação , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Traumatismos dos Dedos/cirurgia , Número de Leitos em Hospital/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Comunitários/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais de Ensino/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Universitários/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Seguro Saúde , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Corpo Clínico Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicare , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multinível , Razão de Chances , Cirurgiões Ortopédicos/provisão & distribuição , Centros de Traumatologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
7.
Arch Cardiovasc Dis ; 114(5): 364-370, 2021 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33541832

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak had a direct impact on adult cardiac surgery activity, which systematically necessitates a postoperative stay in intensive care. AIM: To study the effect of the COVID-19 lockdown on cardiac surgery activity and outcomes, by making a comparison with the corresponding period in 2019. METHODS: This prospective observational cohort study compared adult cardiac surgery activity in our high-volume referral university hospital from 9 March to 10 May 2020 versus 9 March to 10 May 2019. Data were collected in our local certified database and a national database sponsored by the French society of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. The primary study endpoints were operative mortality and postoperative complications. RESULTS: With 105 interventions in 2020, our activity dropped by 57% compared with the same period in 2019. Patients were at higher risk, with a significantly higher EuroSCORE II score (3.8±4.5% vs. 2.0±1.8%; P<0.001) and higher rates of active endocarditis (7.6% vs. 2.9%; P=0.047) and recent myocardial infarction (9.5% vs. 0%; P<0.001). The weight and priority of the interventions were significantly different in 2020 (P=0.019 and P<0.001, respectively). The rate of acute aortic syndromes was also significantly higher in 2020 (P<0.001). Operative mortality was higher during the lockdown period (5.7% vs. 1.7%; P=0.038). The postoperative course was more complicated in 2020, with more postoperative bleeding (P=0.003), mechanical circulatory support (P=0.032) and prolonged mechanical ventilation (P=0.005). Only two patients (1.8%) developed a positive status for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 after discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Adult cardiac surgery was heavily affected by the COVID-19 lockdown. A further modulation plan is necessary to improve outcomes and reduce postponed operations to decrease operative mortality and morbidity.


Assuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos , Hospitais com Alto Volume de Atendimentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Pandemias , Quarentena , SARS-CoV-2 , Idoso , Conversão de Leitos/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/mortalidade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/estatística & dados numéricos , Comorbidade , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/mortalidade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , França/epidemiologia , Cardiopatias/epidemiologia , Cardiopatias/cirurgia , Hospitais Universitários/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Utilização de Procedimentos e Técnicas , Estudos Prospectivos , Sala de Recuperação/estatística & dados numéricos , Tempo para o Tratamento , Listas de Espera
8.
J Surg Res ; 259: 326-331, 2021 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33127064

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: As a result of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, many Pediatric Surgery Fellowship programs were forced to convert their normal in-person interviews into virtual interviews. This study sought to determine the perceived value of virtual interviews for Pediatric Surgery Fellowship. METHODS: An anonymous survey was distributed to the applicants and faculty at a university-affiliated, free-standing children's hospital with a Pediatric Surgery fellowship program that conducted one of three interview days using a virtual format. RESULTS: All applicants who responded to the survey had at least one interview that was converted to a virtual interview. Faculty (75%) and applicants (87.5%) preferred in-person interviews over virtual interviews; most applicants (57%) did not feel they got to know the program as well with the virtual format. Applicants and faculty felt that virtual interviews could potentially be used as a screening tool in the future (7/10 Likert) but did not recommend they be used as a complete replacement for in-person interviews (3.5-5/10 Likert). Applicants were more likely than faculty to report that interview type influenced their final rank list (5 versus 3/10 Likert). CONCLUSIONS: Faculty and applicants preferred in-person interviews and did not recommend that virtual interviews replace in-person interviews. As the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic continues, more virtual interviews will be necessary, and innovations may be necessary to ensure an optimal interview process. TYPE OF STUDY: Survey. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A.


Assuntos
Internato e Residência/organização & administração , Entrevistas como Assunto/métodos , Seleção de Pessoal/métodos , Especialidades Cirúrgicas/educação , Comunicação por Videoconferência , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Docentes/estatística & dados numéricos , Bolsas de Estudo/organização & administração , Hospitais Pediátricos/organização & administração , Hospitais Pediátricos/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Universitários/organização & administração , Hospitais Universitários/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Internato e Residência/estatística & dados numéricos , Entrevistas como Assunto/estatística & dados numéricos , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Seleção de Pessoal/organização & administração , Seleção de Pessoal/estatística & dados numéricos , Distanciamento Físico , Especialidades Cirúrgicas/organização & administração , Centro Cirúrgico Hospitalar/organização & administração , Centro Cirúrgico Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e Questionários/estatística & dados numéricos
9.
Arch Environ Occup Health ; 76(1): 37-44, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32469291

RESUMO

Smoking at workplace (WP) is common among healthcare workers. A cross-sectional study was conducted upon resident physicians and nurses to determine the prevalence of WP smoking and its associated factors. A questionnaire was used to collect socio-demographic and occupational data, smoking history, nicotine dependence, and attitude toward smoking and its control in WP. More than one-fifths (22.7%) of residents and nurses were current WP smokers. Significant independent predictors are having shift work, high nicotine dependence, and having positive attitude toward smoking with AOR (95% CI): 29.4 (4.9-177.1), 18.2 (3.3-101.1), and 0.16 (0.02-0.84), respectively. The prevalence of smoking among resident physicians and nurses in Mansoura University Hospital is relatively high. Enforcement of WP smoking-free policies is required together with encouragement of positive attitude toward smoking cessation.


Assuntos
Fumar Cigarros/epidemiologia , Hospitais Universitários/estatística & dados numéricos , Internato e Residência/estatística & dados numéricos , Enfermeiras e Enfermeiros/estatística & dados numéricos , Local de Trabalho/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Saúde Ocupacional , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Tabagismo/epidemiologia
10.
Scand J Public Health ; 49(3): 260-267, 2021 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32308135

RESUMO

Aims: The purpose of this study was to analyse the prevalence of hospital visits and nature of injuries caused by intimate partner violence (IPV) against women and associated costs. Methods: All visits to Landspitali National University Hospital by women 18 years or older subjected to IPV, inflicted by a current or former male partner during 2005-2014, were observed and analysed. Information was obtained on number, date and time of visits and admissions, place of occurrence, patients' and perpetrators' age and relationship, number of perpetrators, medical diagnosis, aetiology, injury severity and cost. Results: The number of new hospital visits due to IPV was 1454, of which 92.6% were to the Emergency Department. The average age of the women was 34 years and 3.2% were admitted. According to the Injury Severity Score, physical injuries were mostly minor (92.4%) and mainly located on the upper body (64.3%) - namely, face, head and neck (37.1%) and upper limbs (27.2%). The majority of injuries were superficial (76.2%) and punching (29.7%), shoving (17.8%), kicking (10.5%) and attempted strangulation (9.8%) were the most common types of aetiology. Repeated new visits were 37.8%. The total cost for the hospital relating to IPV was €783,330. Conclusions: The total number of new visits resulting from IPV was 1454, and prevalence was 1.69 per 1000 women in the capital area over the research period. The majority of women were shown to have minor physical injuries of a superficial nature, located on the upper body. Although a low percentage of women were admitted, the associated cost for visits and admissions was substantial.


Assuntos
Hospitais Universitários/estatística & dados numéricos , Violência por Parceiro Íntimo/estatística & dados numéricos , Ferimentos e Lesões/epidemiologia , Ferimentos e Lesões/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Custos e Análise de Custo , Feminino , Hospitalização/economia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Universitários/economia , Humanos , Islândia/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Índices de Gravidade do Trauma , Adulto Jovem
11.
J Tissue Viability ; 30(1): 28-35, 2021 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32859473

RESUMO

AIMS: Given the utility of ultrasonography in assessing pressure injury, some ultrasonographic findings have already been used as indicators of deep tissue pressure injury. Despite reports showing that a cloud-like ultrasonographic pattern reflected the presence of deep tissue necrosis, identifying cloud-like patterns was difficult given the presence of similar findings, such as a cobblestone-like pattern. This case series reports patients with pressure injuries who presented with a cloud-like (five cases) and cobblestone-like (four cases) pattern during ultrasonography. METHODS: This study was conducted at a Japanese university hospital. Participants included patients who underwent routine examination by an interdisciplinary pressure injury team. Pressure injury severity was assessed using the DESIGN-R® scoring system and the wound size were measured using ImageJ software based on the wound photograph. RESULTS: Among the five cases showing a cloud-like pattern upon ultrasonography, all exhibited an increase in the total DESIGN-R® score, while three exhibited an increase in wound size. On the other hand, all four cases showing a cobblestone-like pattern displayed no increase in the total DESIGN-R® score and a decrease in wound size. CONCLUSION: This study suggested that distinguishing between cloud-like and cobblestone-like ultrasonography patterns is necessary for determining the presence or absence of deep tissue pressure injury. In order to comprehensively assess pressure injuries with ultrasonography, future studies should be conducted in a large number of participants.


Assuntos
Úlcera por Pressão/diagnóstico por imagem , Ultrassonografia/métodos , Pesos e Medidas/instrumentação , Ferimentos e Lesões/classificação , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Hospitais Universitários/organização & administração , Hospitais Universitários/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Japão , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Úlcera por Pressão/classificação , Ultrassonografia/estatística & dados numéricos , Cicatrização/fisiologia
13.
Evid. actual. práct. ambul ; 24(1): e002113, 2021. tab
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS | ID: biblio-1179134

RESUMO

Antecedentes. La continuidad del cuidado (CoC) suele describir en qué medida los pacientes ven al mismo profesional a lo largo del tiempo. Constituye un elemento necesario para garantizar la longitudinalidad en la atención, elemento clave dela atención primaria y de la medicina familiar en particular, entendido como el cuidado centrado en la persona a lo largo del tiempo, independientemente del tipo de problema consultado. Esta ha sido vinculada con una serie de beneficios para los pacientes y algunos indicadores duros de utilización de servicios de salud, por ejemplo visitas a la central de emergencias(CE), internaciones hospitalarias y mortalidad. En Argentina y América Latina no habíamos podido identificar estudios que dieran cuenta del nivel local de CoC o de su impacto en la utilización de los servicios de salud. Objetivo. Cuantificar los niveles de CoC de los afiliados de un Seguro de Salud de un Hospital Universitario Privado y describir su asociación con la utilización de servicios de salud, tales como consultas a la CE e internaciones hospitalarias. Métodos. Estudio observacional, descriptivo, de cohorte retrospectiva; realizado sobre la totalidad de afiliados que hubieran realizado al menos dos consultas programadas con un médico de atención primaria entre 2015 y 2016.Las mediciones principales consistieron dos indicadores: el índice del proveedor usual de cuidados y el índice de continuidad del cuidado (UPC y COC, respectivamente, por sus iniciales en inglés) -cuyos valores oscilan entre 0 y 1, y se interpretan como: el paciente siempre fue atendido por diferentes médicos vs siempre por el mismo médico-y el recuento de visitas a la CE e internaciones hospitalarias. Resultados. Fueron identificados 112.062 pacientes con una mediana de edad de 59 (P5-P95;4 a 87) años. Las medianas(P5-P95) de los indicadores de continuidad, UPC y COC, fueron 0,66 (0,25 a 1) y 0,33 (0,04 a 1), respectivamente. Se observó una asociación inversa y estadísticamente significativa entre los indicadores de CoC y la cantidad de visitas a la CE, evidenciada por una razón de incidencia decreciente de consultas contra quintilos crecientes de COC (tomando como referencia el quintilo más bajo de continuidad). Esta asociación no pudo demostrarse para las internaciones. Conclusiones. Los niveles de CoC alcanzados y su impacto en la utilización de servicios de salud reflejan valores semejantes a los de otros estudios publicados fuera de nuestra región y podrían aportar elementos útiles para delinear estrategias tendientes a la mejora de la calidad de la atención médica. (AU)


Background. Continuity of care (CoC) usually describes the extent to which patients see the same professional over time. It is a necessary element to ensure continuity of care, a key element of primary care and family medicine, in particular, understood as person-centred care over time, regardless of the type of problem consulted. It has been linked to a series of benefits for patients as well as to hard indicators of health services utilization (e.g. emergency room [ER] visits, hospitalizations) and mortality. In Argentina and Latin America, we have not been able to identify studies that account for the local level of CoC and its impact. Objective. To quantify the CoC levels among members of a private university hospital's health insurance scheme and to describe its association with the use of health services, such as ER visits and hospitalizations. Methods. Observational, descriptive, retrospective cohort study; conducted on the total number of members who hadmade at least two schedurivled consultations with a primary care physician between 2015 and 2016.The main outcomes were two indicators: the usual provider continuity index and the continuity of care index (UPC and COC, respectively) -both range between 0 and 1, and are interpreted as: the patient was always treated by different doctorsvs. always by the same doctor- and the number of visits to the ER and hospitalizations. Results. A total of 112,062 patients with a median age of 59 (P5-P95, 4 to 87) years were identified. The median (P5-P95) of the continuity indicators, UPC and COC, was 0.66 (0.25 to 1) and 0.33 (0.04 to 1), respectively. A significant inverse association was observed between the CoC indicators and the number of ER visits, evidenced by adecreasing incidence rate of consultations versus increasing quintiles of CoC (taking the lowest quintile of continuity as a reference). This association was not observed for hospitalizations. Conclusions. The levels of CoC reached and their impact on the use of health services reflect similar values to those of other studies published outside our region and could provide useful elements for outlining strategies aimed at improvingthe quality of medical care. (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Argentina , Relações Médico-Paciente , Atenção Primária à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Assistência Centrada no Paciente , Medicina de Família e Comunidade , Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Universitários/estatística & dados numéricos , Seguro Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos
14.
Croat Med J ; 61(5): 429-439, 2020 Oct 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33150761

RESUMO

AIM: To prospectively determine the number of patients with sepsis and septic shock in a medical intensive care unit (ICU) using the Sepsis-3 definition; to analyze patients' characteristics, clinical signs, diagnostic test results, treatment and outcomes; and to define independent risk factors for ICU mortality. METHODS: This prospective observational study enrolled all patients with the diagnosis of sepsis treated in the medical ICU of "Sestre Milosrdnice" University Hospital Center, Zagreb, between April 2017 and May 2018. RESULTS: Out of 116 patients with sepsis, 54.3% were female. The median age was 73.5 years (IQR 63-82). The leading source of infection was the genitourinary tract (56.9%), followed by the lower respiratory tract (22.4%). A total of 35.3% of the patients experienced septic shock. Total ICU mortality for sepsis was 37.9%: 63.4% in patients with septic shock and 24.0% in patients without shock. Independent risk factors for ICU mortality were reduced mobility level (odds ratio [OR] 11.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.45-50.91), failure to early recognize sepsis in the emergency department (OR 6.59, 95% CI 1.09-39.75), higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score at admission (OR 2.37, 95% CI 1.59-3.52), and inappropriate antimicrobial treatment (OR 9.99, 95% CI 2.57-38.87). CONCLUSION: While reduced mobility level and SOFA score are predetermined characteristics, early recognition of sepsis and the choice of appropriate antimicrobial treatment could be subject to change. Raising awareness of sepsis among emergency department physicians could improve its early recognition and increase the number of timely obtained specimens for microbial cultures.


Assuntos
Mortalidade Hospitalar , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Sepse/epidemiologia , Choque Séptico/epidemiologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Comorbidade , Croácia/epidemiologia , Feminino , Hospitais Universitários/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Sepse/diagnóstico , Sepse/terapia , Choque Séptico/diagnóstico , Choque Séptico/terapia
16.
Strahlenther Onkol ; 196(12): 1068-1079, 2020 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32914236

RESUMO

PURPOSE: COVID-19 infection has manifested as a major threat to both patients and healthcare providers around the world. Radiation oncology institutions (ROI) deliver a major component of cancer treatment, with protocols that might span over several weeks, with the result of increasing susceptibility to COVID-19 infection and presenting with a more severe clinical course when compared with the general population. The aim of this manuscript is to investigate the impact of ROI protocols and performance on daily practice in the high-risk cancer patients during this pandemic. METHODS: We addressed the incidence of positive COVID-19 cases in both patients and health care workers (HCW), in addition to the protective measures adopted in ROIs in Germany, Austria and Switzerland using a specific questionnaire. RESULTS: The results of the questionnaire showed that a noteworthy number of ROIs were able to complete treatment in SARS-CoV­2 positive cancer patients, with only a short interruption. The ROIs reported a significant decrease in patient volume that was not impacted by the circumambient disease incidence, the type of ROI or the occurrence of positive cases. Of the ROIs 16.5% also reported infected HCWs. About half of the ROIs (50.5%) adopted a screening program for patients whereas only 23.3% also screened their HCWs. The range of protective measures included the creation of working groups, instituting home office work and protection with face masks. Regarding the therapeutic options offered, curative procedures were performed with either unchanged or moderately decreased schedules, whereas palliative or benign radiotherapy procedures were more often shortened. Most ROIs postponed or cancelled radiation treatment for benign indications (88.1%). The occurrence of SARS-CoV­2 infections did not affect the treatment options for curative procedures. Non-university-based ROIs seemed to be more willing to change their treatment options for curative and palliative cases than university-based ROIs. CONCLUSION: Most ROIs reported a deep impact of SARS-CoV­2 infections on their work routine. Modification and prioritization of treatment regimens and the application of protective measures preserved a well-functioning radiation oncology service and patient care.


Assuntos
COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Neoplasias/radioterapia , Pandemias , Recursos Humanos em Hospital/estatística & dados numéricos , SARS-CoV-2/isolamento & purificação , Agendamento de Consultas , Áustria/epidemiologia , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Teste para COVID-19/estatística & dados numéricos , Institutos de Câncer/estatística & dados numéricos , Comorbidade , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Hospitais Comunitários , Hospitais Universitários/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Incidência , Controle de Infecções/organização & administração , Máscaras/estatística & dados numéricos , Máscaras/provisão & distribuição , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Cuidados Paliativos/estatística & dados numéricos , Utilização de Procedimentos e Técnicas , Risco , Inquéritos e Questionários , Suíça/epidemiologia , Telemedicina/estatística & dados numéricos , Teletrabalho/estatística & dados numéricos
17.
JAMA Dermatol ; 156(10): 1074-1078, 2020 10 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32845288

RESUMO

Importance: Insurance companies use prior authorizations (PAs) to address inappropriate prescribing or unnecessary variations in care, most often for expensive medications. Prior authorizations negatively affect patient care and add costs and administrative burden to dermatology offices. Objective: To quantify the administrative burden and costs of dermatology PAs. Design, Setting, and Participants: The University of Utah Department of Dermatology employs 2 full-time and 8 part-time PA staff. In this cross-sectional study at a large academic department spanning 11 clinical locations, these staff itemized all PA-related encounters over a 30-day period in September 2016. Staff salary and benefits were publicly available. Data were analyzed between December 2018 and August 2019. Main Outcomes and Measures: Proportion of visits requiring PAs, median administrative time to finalize a PA (either approval or denial after appeal), and median cost per PA type. Results: In September 2016, 626 PAs were generated from 9512 patient encounters. Staff spent 169.7 hours directly handling PAs, costing a median of $6.72 per PA. Biologic PAs cost a median of $15.80 each and took as long as 31 business days to complete. The costliest PA equaled 106% of the associated visit's Medicare reimbursement rate. Approval rates were 99.6% for procedures, 78.9% for biologics, and 58.2% for other medications. After appeal, 5 of 23 (21.7%) previously denied PAs were subsequently approved. Conclusions and Relevance: Prior authorizations are costly to dermatology practices and their value appears limited for some requests. Fewer unnecessary PAs and appeals might increase practice efficiency and improve patient outcomes.


Assuntos
Dermatologia/economia , Eficiência Organizacional/economia , Autorização Prévia/economia , Dermatopatias/terapia , Estudos Transversais , Fármacos Dermatológicos/economia , Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapêutico , Dermatologia/organização & administração , Dermatologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Prescrições de Medicamentos/economia , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Eficiência Organizacional/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Universitários/economia , Hospitais Universitários/organização & administração , Hospitais Universitários/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Medicare/economia , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Cirurgia de Mohs/economia , Cirurgia de Mohs/estatística & dados numéricos , Autorização Prévia/estatística & dados numéricos , Mecanismo de Reembolso/economia , Mecanismo de Reembolso/estatística & dados numéricos , Dermatopatias/sangue , Dermatopatias/economia , Fatores de Tempo , Terapia Ultravioleta/economia , Terapia Ultravioleta/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos
18.
PLoS One ; 15(8): e0237159, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32760101

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Computerized Clinical Decision Support Systems (CCDSS) have become increasingly important in ensuring patient safety and supporting all phases of clinical decision making. The aim of this study is to evaluate, through a CCDSS, the rate of the laboratory tests overuse and to estimate the cost of the inappropriate requests in a large university hospital. METHOD: In this observational study, hospital physicians submitted the examination requests for the inpatients through a Computerized Physician Order Entry. Violations of the rules in tests requests were intercepted and counted by a CCDSS, over a period of 20 months. Descriptive and inferential statistics (Student's t-test and ANOVA) were made. Finally, the monthly comprehensive cost of the laboratory tests was calculated. RESULTS: During the observation period a total of 5,716,370 requests were analyzed and 809,245 violations were counted. The global rate of overuse was 14.2% ± 3.0%. The most inappropriate exams were Alpha Fetoprotein (85.8% ± 30.5%), Chlamydia trachomatis Nucleic Acid Amplification (48.7% ± 8.8%) and Alkaline Phosphatase (20.3% ± 6.5%). The monthly cost of over-utilization was 56,534€ for basic panel, 14,421€ for coagulation, 4,758€ for microbiology, 432€ for immunology exams. All the exams, generated an estimated avoidable cost of 1,719,337€ (85,967€ per month) for the hospital. CONCLUSIONS: The study confirms the wide variability in over-utilization rates of laboratory tests. For these reasons, the real impact of inappropriateness is difficult to assess, but the generated costs for patients, hospitals and health systems are certainly high and not negligible. It would be desirable for international medical communities to produce a complete panel of prescriptive rules for all the most common laboratory exams that is useful not only to reduce costs, but also to ensure standardization and high-quality care.


Assuntos
Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico/economia , Custos e Análise de Custo , Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Clínicas/economia , Utilização de Instalações e Serviços/estatística & dados numéricos , Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico/estatística & dados numéricos , Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Clínicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Utilização de Instalações e Serviços/economia , Hospitais Universitários/economia , Hospitais Universitários/estatística & dados numéricos
19.
World Neurosurg ; 144: e204-e209, 2020 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32827748

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has directly and indirectly impacted health care systems, including residency programs. Social distancing, cancellation of elective cases, and staff re-deployment have compromised clinical and academic teaching. We describe the neurosurgical experience at Emory University during the COVID-19 pandemic and the impact of COVID-19-related policies on resident experience. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all neurosurgical cases performed at Emory University Hospital between March 16, the day cancellation of elective cases was effective, and April 15, 2020, and the same period in the preceding 3 years. For the study period, we collected the number of cases and their distribution by subspecialty along with total hospital charges. RESULTS: Compared with an average of 606 cases performed during the study period over the past 3 years, only 145 neurosurgical cases were performed between March 16 and April 15, 2020, which corresponds to an 80% reduction in case volume and 66% decrease in hospital revenue in 2020. When divided by subspecialty, the most significant reduction was observed in functional (84%; P < 0.01) followed by spine (78%; P < 0.01) surgery, although all subspecialties were significantly impacted. Assessing junior resident experience, we observed a significant reduction in number of neurosurgical admissions (47%; P < 0.01) and bedside procedures (59%; P < 0.01) in the study period in 2020 compared with the past 3 years, with no significant reduction in number of consultations (17%; P > 0.1). CONCLUSIONS: Even at academic centers that were not hugely impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, prophylactic and preparedness measures still exhibited an unprecedented toll on neurosurgical resident and fellow experience.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Neurocirurgia/educação , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/estatística & dados numéricos , Georgia , Preços Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Universitários/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Neuroendoscopia/educação , Neuroendoscopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos/educação , Admissão e Escalonamento de Pessoal , Encaminhamento e Consulta/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/educação
20.
Emergencias ; 32(4): 227-232, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32691999

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of a coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) prevention and control program for health care workers in a tertiary care hospital emergency department (ED). MATERIAL AND METHODS: We recorded the number of confirmed COVID-19 workers in the ED on March 2, 2020, and April 12, 2020. Workers were screened if they had symptoms or were traced as contacts. Variables recorded were age, sex, staff position, work area, and reason for contact. We used the χ2 test to compare ED workers to workers in other areas of the health care system. RESULTS: Of the 3900 health care workers (279 in the ED), 1744 cases (92 in the ED) were included for analysis. A total of 736 workers (52 in the ED) had symptoms, and 151 had positive test results (9 from the ED). Two of the infections in the ED workers (22.2%) were attributed to patient contact and 7 (77.8%) to nonwork-related contact either in the workplace or in the community. The prevalence of COVID-19 among ED workers was 3.2% (9/279). The prevalence among other health system workers was 3.9% (142/3621). The differences in COVID-19 prevalence between the 2 groups was not significant. Nor was there a significant difference in the reasons for contact with the virus between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: Based on the prevalence of COVID-19 among ED workers and other health care workers, the reasons for risk of contact with the virus, and the time frame for gathering the data, we conclude that the prevention and control measures in the ED have been effective.


OBJETIVO: Evaluar la efectividad de un programa de prevención y control de infecciones (PCI) por COVID-19 en los trabajadores sanitarios (TS) del servicio de urgencias de un hospital terciario. METODO: Se recogió el número de casos confirmados de COVID-19 en TS del 2 de marzo al 12 de abril de 2020. Los TS fueron evaluados si presentaban síntomas o en el marco de estudios de contactos. Se recogió: edad, sexo, estamento, área trabajo y motivo contacto. Se comparó si existían diferencias entre los TS del SU y los del resto del Departamento de Salud (DS). RESULTADOS: De los 3.900 TS del DS (279 adscritos al SU), se evaluaron 1.744 TS (92 del SU). Presentaron síntomas 736 (52 del SU); 151 fueron confirmados COVID-19 (9 del SU). Dos casos del SU (22,2%) se atribuyeron a la asistencia sanitaria, y 7 (77,8%) a relaciones sociales en el lugar de trabajo o fuera de este. La prevalencia de TS con COVID-19 en el SU fue de un 3,2% (9/279), y en el resto de TS del 3,9% (142/3621). Entre los TS del SU y del resto del DS no hubo diferencias significativas en la prevalencia de afectados, ni entre los motivos de contacto. CONCLUSIONES: Teniendo en cuenta la prevalencia de TS con COVID-19 del SU respecto al resto del DS, el motivo del contacto de riesgo y su distribución en el tiempo, se puede considerar que el PCI orientado al SU fue efectivo.


Assuntos
Betacoronavirus , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoal de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Doenças Profissionais/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Centros de Atenção Terciária/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , COVID-19 , Infecções por Coronavirus/prevenção & controle , Infecções por Coronavirus/transmissão , Feminino , Hospitais Universitários/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doenças Profissionais/prevenção & controle , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Pneumonia Viral/prevenção & controle , Pneumonia Viral/transmissão , Prevalência , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , SARS-CoV-2 , Espanha/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA