Assessment of immune cells in the uterine fluid at the time of the embryo transfer.

PROBLEM: Although endometrial receptivity is a key factor in influencing implantation in both naturally conceived and assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycles, very little is known about the endometrium milieu around the time of implantation. Previous studies have demonstrated the presence of several cytokines in the endometrium that affect implantation. However, there is lacking data about the presence of immune cell subtypes within the endometrium and in the uterine cavity at the time of implantation. METHOD OF STUDY: This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (# 225589). The study was designed as a prospective observational cohort study between May 2021 and December 2022 at a single academic-based fertility center. All patients underwent at least one In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) cycle and have frozen embryos. Twenty-four participants were recruited for this study which was conducted during the frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycle regardless of the outcome of previous cycles. Two samples were acquired from each subject, denoted as lower and upper. A trial transfer catheter was introduced under ultrasound guidance into the lower uterine segment. Upon removal, the tip was rinsed in IMDM medium containing 10% FBS (lower uterus). A transfer catheter was then loaded with the embryo that was placed in the upper uterus under ultrasound guidance. The tip of the transfer catheter was rinsed in separate aliquot of the above media (upper uterus). After centrifugation, pelleted cells were stained for the following surface markers: CD45, CD3, CD19, CD4, CD8, gamma delta TCR, CD25, CD127, CD66b, CD14, CD16, CD56 and acquired on Sony SP6800 Spectral Analyzer. RESULTS: Upon staining the pelleted cells, we were able to identify viable leukocytes from samples obtained from both, upper and lower uterus (0.125 × 106 cells ± SD 0.32), (0.123 × 106 cells ± SD 0.12), respectively. Among total viable cells, there was no significant difference in both percent and number of CD45+ cells between the upper and lower uterus (9.88% ± 6.98 SD, 13.67% ± 9.79 SD, p = .198) respectively. However, there was significantly higher expression of CD3+ (p = .006), CD19+ (p = .032) and CD14+ (p = .019) cells in samples collected from upper compared to lower uterus. Within all CD3+ cells, we found that gamma delta T cells (GDT) were the major population of T cells in both upper and lower uterus. In contrast, CD8+ T cells were significantly higher in the lower uterus when compared to the upper uterus (p = .009). There was no statistically significant difference in the expression of CD4+ T cells, T regulatory cells (CD4+CD25+CD127-), NK cells (CD56+), neutrophils (CD66b+) and FcγRIII+ cells (CD16+) between upper and lower uterus. CONCLUSIONS: We believe the immune milieu at the time of embryo transfer will affect implantation. Understanding the composition of immune cells will guide further research in identifying optimal immune milieus that favor implantation. Comprehensive analysis of endometrium is expected to lead to new diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to improve IVF outcomes.

Detailed endometrial immune assessment of both normal and adverse reproductive outcome populations.

PURPOSE: Using a comprehensive flow cytometric panel, do endometrial immune profiles in adverse reproductive outcomes such as repeat implantation failure (RIF) and repeat pregnancy loss (RPL) differ from each other and male-factor controls? METHODS: Six-hundred and twelve patients had an endometrial biopsy to assess the immunophenotype. History on presentation was used to subdivide the population into recurrent implantation failure (RIF) [n = 178], recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) [n = 155], primary infertility [n = 130] and secondary infertility [n = 114]. A control group was utilised for comparative purposes [n = 35] and lymphocyte subpopulations were described. RESULTS: Distinct lymphocyte percentage differences were noted across the populations. Relative to controls and RPL, patients with a history of RIF had significantly raised uterine NKs (53.2 vs 45.2 & 42.9%, p < 0.0001). All sub-fertile populations had increased percentage peripheral type NKs (p = 0.001), and exhibited increased CD69+ activation (p = 0.005), higher levels of B cells (p < 0.001), elevated CD4:CD8 ratio (p < 0.0001), lower T-regs (p = 0.034) and a higher proportion of Th1+ CD4s (p = 0.001). Patient aetiology confers some distinct findings, RPL; pNK, Bcells and CD4 elevated; RIF; uNK and CD56 raised while CD-8 and NK-T lowered. CONCLUSIONS: Flow cytometric endometrial evaluation has the ability to provide a rapid and objective analysis of lymphocyte subpopulations. The findings show significant variations in cellular proportions of immune cells across the patient categories relative to control tissue. The cell types involved suggest that a potential differential pro-inflammatory bias may exist in patients with a history of adverse reproductive outcomes. Immunological assessment in appropriate populations may provide insight into the underlying aetiology of some cases of reproductive failure.

Assessment of requirements for IL-15 and IFN regulatory factors in uterine NK cell differentiation and function during pregnancy.

In mouse and human, precursors of NK cell lineage home to decidualizing uteri. To assess the requirement for IL-15, an essential cytokine for NK differentiation in lymphoid tissue, on uterine NK (uNK) cell differentiation, implantation sites from IL-15(-/-) mice were analyzed histologically. IL-15(-/-) implantation sites had no uNK cells, no spiral-artery modification, and lacked the decidual integrity found in normal mice. IL-15(-/-) recipients of C57BL/6 marrow displayed similar pathology. However, implantation sites from recombination-activating gene-2(-/-)gamma(c)(-/-) (alymphoid) recipients of IL-15(-/-) marrow showed normal uNK cells, modified spiral arteries, and well-developed decidua basalis. Deletion of the IFN-regulatory factor (IRF)-1, but not IRF-2 (factors important in peripheral NK cell differentiation) limited but did not prevent uNK cell development. In situ hybridization localized IRF-1 largely to placental trophoblast cells. IRF-1(-/-) marrow transplanted into recombination-activating gene-2(-/-)gamma(c)(-/-) displayed competence for full uNK cell differentiation. IL-15 mRNA expression at implantation sites of IRF-1(-/-) and C57BL/6 was similar, suggesting that, unlike in bone marrow and spleen, IRF-1 does not regulate IL-15 in the pregnant uterus. Terminal differentiation of uNK cells was not promoted in pregnant IRF-1(-/-) mice by 5-day infusion of murine rIL-15, suggesting that IRF-1 deficiency rather than IL-15 deficiency limits uNK cell differentiation in these mice. Further, IRF-1 regulates placental growth, birth weight, and postnatal growth of offspring. These studies indicate that uNK cell development and maturation share some aspects with NK cell development in other tissues, but also display distinctive tissue-specific regulation.