Mobilizing stakeholders for implant removals in Burkina Faso using landscape assessment data.

BACKGROUND: Successful efforts to encourage uptake of subdermal contraceptive implants, with a lifespan of three to five years, necessitate planning to ensure that quality removal services are available when desired. In Burkina Faso, implant use has tripled over the past 8 years and now comprises almost half of the contraceptive method mix. Population Monitoring for Action (PMA) surveys identified barriers to obtaining quality removal when desired, particularly when the implant is not palpable, or providers lack needed skills or supplies. The Expanding Family Planning Choices (EFPC) project supported ministries of health in four countries with evaluation and strengthening of implant removal services. METHODS: An implant removal landscape assessment was conducted at 24 health facilities in three regions of Burkina Faso with high implant use that included provider observations of implant removal, interviews with providers and health facility managers, and facility readiness surveys. The project used landscape data to mobilize stakeholders through a series of participatory workshops to develop a collaborative roadmap and commit to actions supporting quality implant removals. RESULTS: Landscape findings revealed key gaps in provision of quality removal services, including high levels of provider confidence for implant insertion and removal (82% and 71%, respectively), low competence performing simple and difficult removals (19.2% and 11.1%, respectively), inadequate supplies and equipment (no facilities had all necessary materials for removal), lack of difficult removal management systems, and a lack of standard data collection tools for removal. Exposure to the data convinced stakeholders to focus on removals rather than expanding insertion services. While not all roadmap commitments were achieved, the process led to critical investments in quality implant removals. CONCLUSION: Landscape data revealed that facilities lack needed supplies and equipment, and providers lack skills needed to perform quality implant removals, limiting client reproductive choice. Disseminating this data enabled stakeholders to identify and commit to evidence-based priority actions. Stakeholders have since capitalized on program learnings and the roadmap, including following MOH guidance for implant removal supplies and health provider training. Our experience in Burkina Faso offers a replicable model of how data can direct collective action to improve quality of contraceptive implant removals.

Retinal changes after fluocinolone acetonide implant (ILUVIEN®) for DME: SD-OCT imaging assessment using ESASO classification.

INTRODUCTION: A detailed understanding of the anatomical and structural changes occurring in the retina following intravitreal fluocinolone acetonide implantation may help improve the management and prognosis of persistent or recurrent diabetic macular edema (DME). METHODS: Overall, 45 eyes (from 35 patients) with refractory center-involved DME received an intravitreal fluocinolone acetonide implant. They were monitored at baseline and at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months for best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central foveal thickness (CFT), and the seven retinal parameters used in the classification of diabetic maculopathy recently developed at the European School for Advanced Studies in Ophthalmology (ESASO). RESULTS: Within 6 months of implantation, significant improvements were evident in BCVA, CFT, maculopathy stage, and the percentage of eyes with: intraretinal cysts; CFT > 30% above the upper normal value; and disrupted or absent ellipsoid zone (EZ) and/or external limiting membrane (ELM). Significant improvements were still maintained at 36 months post-implantation. At month 36, early treatment with the implant (i.e., after < 6 previous intravitreal injections for DME) trended toward being more effective than later treatment in improving BCVA, CFT, maculopathy stage, and the percentage of eyes with CFT > 30% above the upper normal value. However, statistical significance was not achieved. CONCLUSION: In persistent or recurrent DME, fluocinolone acetonide implantation can be effective in improving maculopathy stage and reducing the percentage of eyes with: intraretinal cysts; CFT > 30% above the upper normal value; and disrupted or absent EZ and/or ELM. It can also increase BCVA and reduce CFT.

Optimization of radial extrusion and pellet coating processes using PAT approaches.

FDA's initiative Pharmaceutical CGMPs for the 21st century opened the door for introduction of several risk based approaches in pharmaceutical industry. One significant advancement that has emerged is the implementation of process analytical technology (PAT), which has opened doors for understanding and controlling complex technological processes. Two such processes, radial extrusion and pellet coating, offer a solid foundation for the application of PAT tools due to their numerous critical process parameters. The aim of the first part of the study was to optimize the neutral pellet production to produce the pellets with properties desired for successful film coating using design of experiments (DoE). In the second part the optimized pellets underwent film coating and the coating quantity was predicted in real or near real-time using in-line and at-line NIR probes and the performance of both probes was compared. The desired properties of the pellets, narrow particle size distribution, high sphericity and high process yield, were successfully achieved. Models for film coating quantity prediction using in-line and at-line NIR probe were successfully calibrated and tested by coating two additional batches. Despite the limited sample size for model calibration, at-line NIR exhibited excellent prediction performance and enabled accurate determination of process end-point. The coating quantity determined by UV/VIS spectroscopy in both test batches deviated by less than 2.0 % from the target value. However, the in-line NIR probe, primarily due to its inferior spectral resolution, displayed a slightly lower quality of the calibrated model and notable overprediction for the tested batches.

Análise de impacto orçamentário de dispositivos contraceptivos na saúde suplementar brasileira / Budget impact analysis of contraceptive devices on Brazilian supplementary health

Objetivo: Analisar o impacto orçamentário da adoção de dispositivos contraceptivos reversíveis de longa duração em uma operadora de plano de saúde localizada no Sul do Brasil. Especificamente, analisamos a incorporação do implante subdérmico de etonogestrel (Implanon®) como alternativa ao sistema intrauterino de levonorgestrel (DIU Mirena® ou DIU Kyleena®), ao longo de um período de 15 anos. Métodos: Realizamos uma análise do impacto orçamentário incremental, considerando a inclusão gradual do implante subdérmico de etonogestrel. Foram considerados dados de uma operadora de planos de saúde com mais de 600.000 beneficiários. O horizonte temporal de 15 anos permitiu uma avaliação abrangente dos efeitos financeiros. Resultados: Identificamos 5.345 pacientes elegíveis para a utilização de contraceptivos reversíveis de longa duração. No cenário em que somente o sistema intrauterino de levonorgestrel era adotado, projetou-se um impacto orçamentário total de R$ 746.379.857,80 ao longo de 15 anos. No cenário alternativo, com a incorporação gradual do implante subdérmico, o impacto orçamentário total foi calculado em R$ 689.800.196,83. Isso resultou em um impacto orçamentário incremental negativo de -R$ 56.579.660,97 ao longo do período. Conclusão: A análise de impacto orçamentário realizada indica um potencial benefício financeiro ao adotar o implante subdérmico de etonogestrel como alternativa ao sistema intrauterino de levonorgestrel para contracepção. Esse achado sugere possíveis reduções de custos na área de saúde suplementar no Brasil, reforçando a importância de avaliar opções economicamente viáveis.

Objective: To analyze the budgetary impact of the adoption of long-acting reversible contraceptive devices in a health plan operator located in southern Brazil. Specifically, we analyzed the incorporation of the etonogestrel subdermal implant (Implanon®) as an alternative to the levonorgestrel intrauterine system (Mirena® IUD or Kyleena® IUD), over a period of 15 years. Methods: We performed an analysis of the incremental budgetary impact, considering the gradual inclusion of the etonogestrel subdermal implant. Data from a health plan operator with more than 600,000 beneficiaries were considered. The 15-year time horizon allowed for a comprehensive assessment of the financial effects. Results: We identified 5,345 patients eligible for the use of long-acting reversible contraceptives. In the scenario where only the levonorgestrel intrauterine system was adopted, a total budget impact of BRL 746,379,857.80 was projected over 15 years. In the alternative scenario, with the gradual incorporation of the subdermal implant, the total budgetary impact was calculated at BRL 689,800,196.83. This resulted in a negative incremental budgetary impact of -R$56,579,660.97 over the period. Conclusion: The budget impact analysis carried out indicates a potential financial benefit in adopting the etonogestrel subdermal implant as an alternative to the levonorgestrel intrauterine system for contraception. This finding suggests possible cost reductions in the supplementary healthcare area in Brazil, reinforcing the importance of evaluating economically viable options.

Cost-Effectiveness of Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant in Naïve and Previously Treated Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema.

PURPOSE: To compare the direct costs associated with the dexamethasone intravitreal implant (DEX-i) in treatment-naïve and previously treated eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME) in a real clinical setting. METHODS: Retrospective and single-center study conducted in a real clinical scenario. Consecutive DME patients, either naïve or previously treated with vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors (anti-VEGF), who received treatment with one or more DEX-i between May 2015 and December 2020, and who were followed-up for a minimum of 12 months, were included in the study. The cost analysis was performed from the perspective of the Andalusian Regional Healthcare Service. The primary effectiveness endpoint was the probability of achieving an improvement in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) ≥ 15 ETDRS letters after 1 year of treatment. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of different improvements in BCVA was calculated. RESULTS: Forty-nine eyes, twenty-eight (57.1%) eyes from the treatment-naïve group and twenty-one (42.9%) from the previously treated group, were included in the analysis. The total cost of one year of treatment was significantly lower in the treatment-naïve eyes than in the previously treated eyes [Hodges-Lehmann median difference: EUR 819.1; 95% confidence interval (CI): EUR 786.9 to EUR 1572.8; p < 0.0001]. The probability of achieving a BCVA improvement of ≥15 letters at month 12 was significantly greater in the treatment-naïve group than in the previously treated group (rate difference: 0.321; 95% CI: 0.066 to 0.709; p = 0.0272). The Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel Odds Ratio of achieving a BCVA improvement of ≥15 letters at month 12 was 3.55 (95% CI: 1.09 to 11.58; p = 0.0309). In terms of ICER, the treatment-naïve group showed cost savings of EUR 7704.2 and EUR 5994.2 for achieving an improvement in BCVA ≥ 15 letters at month 12 and at any of the measured time points, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: DEX-i was found to be more cost-effective in treatment-naïve eyes than in those previously treated with anti-VEGF. Further studies are needed to determine the most cost-effective treatment based on patient profile.

Pregnancy and pregnancy outcomes in a prospective cohort study: Final results from the Nexplanon Observational Risk Assessment Study (NORA).

OBJECTIVES: To monitor pregnancy occurrence and outcomes among Nexplanon users in the United States during standard clinical practice. STUDY DESIGN: The Nexplanon Observational Risk Assessment (NORA) study was a large prospective cohort study conducted in the United States (US). Study participants with a newly inserted Nexplanon implant were recruited by health care professionals (HCPs) who had completed the Nexplanon clinical training. Via a survey, study participants were followed up at 6-month intervals for 36 months and 6 months after implant removal. Reported unintended pregnancies were validated and classified as noninsertion, preinsertion, during-use, or postremoval. RESULTS: Four hundred and twenty-eight HCPs in 47 states recruited 7364 Nexplanon users. Pregnancies included one noninsertion, eight preinsertion, three during-use, and 14 postremoval pregnancies; of these 26 pregnancies, 22 resulted in the birth of a healthy child, two resulted in an induced abortion, one resulted in a spontaneous abortion, and one resulted in an ectopic pregnancy. Six pregnancies occurred during-use (n = 3) or within 7 days following implant removal (n = 3), yielding a Pearl Index of 0.04 (95% CI, 0.02-0.09). CONCLUSIONS: Nexplanon is an effective contraceptive in real-world users; the Pearl Index was 0.02 (95% CI, 0.00-0.06) for during-use pregnancies, and 0.04 when including pregnancies that occurred within 7 days following implant removal. IMPLICATIONS: This large real-world-use study indicates that Nexplanon is as effective as shown in the preapproval clinical trials.

Early-switch versus late-switch in patients with diabetic macular edema: a cost-effectiveness study.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of early- versus late-switch to the intravitreal-dexamethasone implant (DEX-i) in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) who did not adequately respond to vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors (anti-VEGF). METHODS: Retrospective analysis of a multicenter Clinical Data Registry. The registry included DME eyes who received 3 intravitreal anti-VEGF injections (early-switch) or > 3 intravitreal anti-VEGF injections (late-switch) before switching to DEX-i injections. The primary outcome was to estimate the incremental cost needed to obtain a best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improvement ≥ 0.1 or a central-retinal thickness CRT ≤ 250 µm. RESULTS: The analysis included 108 eyes, 32 (29.6%) and 76 (70.4%) in the early- and late-switch groups, respectively. Early-switch strategy was associated with a cost saving of €3,057.8; 95% CI: €2,406.4-3,928.4, p < 0.0001). Regarding incremental-cost-effectiveness ratio, late-switch group was associated with an incremental cost of €25,735.2 and €13,533.2 for achieving a BCVA improvement ≥ 0.1 at month 12 and at any of the time-point measured, respectively. At month 12, 38 (35.2%) eyes achieved a BCVA improvement ≥ 0.1. At month 12, 52 (48.1) eyes had achieved a CRT ≤ 250 micron. As compared to baseline, the mean (95% CI) CRT reduction was - 163.1 (- 212.5 to - 113.7) µm and - 161.6 (- 183.8 to - 139.3) µm in the early-switch and late-switch groups, respectively, p = 0.9463. CONCLUSIONS: In DME eyes, who did not adequately respond to anti-VEGF, switching to DEX-i at early stages (after the first 3-monthly injections) was found to be more cost-effective than extending the treatment to 6-monthly injections of anti-VEGF.

Economic Aspects in the Management of Diabetic Macular Edema in Italy.

Background: Diabetic Macular Edema (DME) is the most common cause of vision loss in diabetic patients. Currently, the Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor inhibitors (anti-VEGFs) are used as the first line of DME treatment and corticosteroid implants are usually used as a second-line treatment. These implants are a safe and effective therapeutic option that can improve the quality of life of DME patients by reducing the intravitreal injections number. We determined the economic impact related to DME, also from the social perspective, and the consequences of the increased use of the dexamethasone implant. Methods: The analysis compares two scenarios: the first based on the current rate of recourse to the therapeutic alternatives available in the Italian healthcare setting (as is) and the second based on the assumption of an increased recourse to dexamethasone implants (to be). The results are expressed both in terms of the resource absorption associated with the two scenarios and in terms of the cost differential yielded by their comparison. Results: The increased use of the dexamethasone implant allows considerable savings in terms of healthcare professionals' time, follow-up and productivity lost by patients/caregivers. These savings would reduce healthcare costs for the management of DME patients in Italy by €2,058,238 in 5 years. Conclusions: To optimize the healthcare resources allocation, it is necessary to implement treatments that yield not only cost reductions but also a clinical benefit for patients. The dexamethasone implant use is an example of DME management that generates value for patients, health system and society.

Anterior chamber changes assessment by Scheimpflug analysis after intravitreal dexamethasone implantation.

PURPOSE: To evaluate structural changes in the anterior chamber and intraocular pressure (IOP) changes following intravitreal dexamethasone implantation. METHODS: Forty-two eyes of 42 patients that received intravitreal dexamethasone implant for the management of macular edema secondary to diabetic retinopathy or branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) were included in the study. IOP was measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry. Anterior chamber depth (ACD) and iridocorneal angle (ICA) was measured by a Scheimflug camera (Sirius, CSO, Italy) the day before the injection of the dexamethasone implant and on postoperative day 1, first week, and first month. RESULTS: Mean IOP was 15.14 ± 2.77 mmHg before the procedure and, 15.67 ± 3.70 mmHg, 15.86 ± 3.11 mmHg, 16.21 ± 2.75 mmHg on day 1, first week, and first month following intravitreal dexamethasone implantation, respectively. Mean ICA and ACD were significantly higher in pseudophakic eyes compared to phakic eyes. However, there was no statistically significant change in ICA before and after the procedure (on postoperative day 1, first week, and first month) among both phakic and pseudophakic patients (p = 0.783). Similarly, ACD remained unchanged after the procedure (on postoperative day 1, first week, and first month) compared to the initial measurement (p = 0.802). CONCLUSION: This study confirmed that there was an increase in IOP. However, these changes were not accompanied with a change in ACD or ICA.

Clinical characteristics and treatment patterns with histrelin acetate subcutaneous implants vs. leuprolide injections in children with precocious puberty: a real-world study using a US claims database.

OBJECTIVES: Gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogs are the treatment of choice for central precocious puberty (CPP). This study characterizes patients treated with histrelin implant or leuprolide injection. METHODS: A US claims database was used to identify patients aged ≤20 years with ≥1 histrelin or leuprolide claim (index treatment) between April 2010 and November 2017 and continuous enrollment ≥3 months before and ≥12 months after the index treatment date. RESULTS: Overall, 4,217 patients (histrelin, n=1,001; leuprolide, n=3,216) were identified. The percentage of patients with CPP diagnosis was greater in the histrelin (96.5%) vs. leuprolide (68.8%; p<0.0001) cohort. In patients with CPP (histrelin, n=966; leuprolide, n=2,214), mean age at treatment initiation was similar for histrelin (9.0 ± 2.0 years) and leuprolide (9.1 ± 2.3 years), with >50% of patients aged 6-9 years. Mean treatment duration was significantly longer for histrelin (26.7 ± 14.8 months) vs. leuprolide (14.1 ± 12.1 months; p<0.0001), and was longer in younger patient groups. More patients switched from leuprolide to histrelin (12.3%) than vice versa (3.6%; p<0.0001). Median annual total treatment costs were slightly lower for the histrelin cohort ($23,071 [interquartile range, $16,833-$31,050]) than the leuprolide cohort ($27,021 [interquartile range, $18,314-$34,995]; p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CPP treated with histrelin had a longer duration of treatment, lower rates of index treatment discontinuation, and lower annual treatment costs vs. those treated with leuprolide.

Implante subdérmico de etonogestrel na prevenção da gravidez não planejada por mulheres adultas em idade reprodutiva entre 18 e 49 anos / Subdermal etonogestrel implant for prevention of unplanned pregnancy by adult women in reproductive age between 18 and 49 years old

CONTEXTO: A gravidez não intencional se caracteriza como um problema de saúde pública e abrange de forma ampla a gravidez não planejada e a gravidez não desejada. A taxa global de gravidez não intencional tem apresentado declínio nos últimos anos em todo o mundo. No Brasil, estima-se que mais da metade das gravidezes podem ser consideradas como não planejadas. A contracepção é a prevenção intencional da gravidez e é capaz de reduzir a mortalidade materna e neonatal. Contudo, muitas mulheres que desejam evitar a gravidez não utilizam contraceptivos, usam de forma inconsistente ou incorreto. O aconselhamento sobre os métodos contraceptivos e a educação sexual são estratégias que auxiliam a evitar a gravidez não intencional. O SUS disponibiliza uma variedade de métodos contraceptivos, reversíveis ou permanentes, além de ações e políticas voltadas para a saúde sexual e o planejamento familiar. TECNOLOGIA: Implante contraceptivo subdérmico de etonogestrel (IMPLANON NXT®). PERGUNTA: O uso do implante subdérmico de etonogestrel por mulheres adultas em idade reprodutiva é eficaz na prevenção de gravidez não planejada, custo-efetivo, e apresenta maior adesão ou satisfação comparadas aos contraceptivos oferecidos pelo SUS? EVIDÊNCIAS CLÍNICAS: O conjunto da evidência clínica de eficácia, adesão e segurança do implante subdérmico de etonogestrel para mulheres adultas em idade reprodutiva, maiores de 18 anos, é proveniente de três ensaios clínicos e cinco estudos de coorte, que foram avaliados como de baixa a moderada qualidade metodológica. O implante subdérmico de etonogestrel demonstrou maior eficácia contraceptiva e maior taxa de continuação de uso no decorrer de três anos frente ao DIU de cobre, embora as suas taxas de eficácia e continuação de uso também sejam elevadas. Ao final de um ano, o implante de etonogestrel demonstrou maior taxa de satisfação do que o DIU de cobre, embora a sua taxa de satisfação também seja elevada. De um modo geral, alterações no peso corporal e no índice de massa corporal foram maiores entre as usuárias do implante de etonogestrel e do injetável trimestral de acetato de medroxiprogesterona quando comparado ao DIU de cobre, embora para alguns autores estes achados não possuem significância clínica. O distúrbio do sangramento está entre as principais causas para a descontinuação de uso do implante subdérmico de etonogestrel, seguido por ganho de peso, e a expulsão do dispositivo e o distúrbio do sangramento estão entre as principais causas para a descontinuação de uso do DIU de cobre. Não foram encontrados estudos que preenchessem os critérios de inclusão da pergunta de pesquisa e que comparassem o implante subdérmico de etonogestrel frente aos demais contraceptivos reversíveis disponíveis no SUS. AVALIAÇÃO ECONÔMICA: Análise de custo-efetividade, com horizonte temporal de três anos, na perspectiva do SUS, comparou o implante subdérmico de etonogestrel frente ao DIU de cobre, aos injetáveis mensal e trimestral, à pílula e à minipílula disponível no SUS. Frente ao DIU de cobre, o implante resultou em uma razão de custo-efetividade incremental (RCEI) de R$ 6.356,07 por gravidez não planejada. O implante de etonogestrel foi dominante frente aos demais contraceptivos disponíveis no SUS. Em suas análises de sensibilidade, os resultados se mantiveram e o custo do implante de etonogestrel se destacou entre as variáveis que mais impactam no modelo. Foram identificadas algumas incertezas nos parâmetros, que podem estar impactando consideravelmente nos resultados, desfavorecendo os comparadores. ANÁLISE DE IMPACTO ORÇAMENTÁRIO: Na perspectiva da população por demanda aferida, o demandante estimou um incremento de R$5.924.413 no primeiro ano, para uma população de 3.869.561, e uma economia de R$4.426.700 no quinto ano, para uma população de 3.911.195. Ao final de cinco anos, uma economia de R$ 6.780.627,00. Na perspectiva epidemiológica da população, foi estimado um incremento de R$40.890.518 no primeiro ano, para uma população de 26.707.854, e uma economia de R$30.553.251, para uma população de 26.995.213. Ao final de cinco anos, uma economia de R$ 46.800.143,00. Para se chegar a estes valores, o demandante contabilizou os gastos com os métodos contraceptivos e com a gravidez não planejada, e subtraiu os valores entre cenários sem e com o implante subdérmico, considerando uma possível incorporação. As incertezas descritas podem estar subestimando o impacto orçamentário incremental, favorecendo a intervenção. Em cenários alternativos, desconsiderando os gastos com gravidez não planejada, estes valores podem variar de R$ 183.017.788,83 a R$ 1.263.195.588,17 ao final de cinco anos. MONITORAMENTO DO HORIZONTE TECNOLÓGICO: Foi detectado um anel vaginal de etinilestradiol associado com segestrone, indicado para mulheres adultas e em idade reprodutiva. RECOMENDAÇÃO PRELIMINAR DA CONITEC: A Conitec, em sua 93ª Reunião Ordinária, realizada no dia 09 de dezembro de 2020, deliberou que a matéria fosse disponibilizada em consulta pública com recomendação preliminar desfavorável à incorporação do implante subdérmico de etonogestrel para prevenção da gravidez não planejada por mulheres adultas em idade reprodutiva entre 18 e 49 anos no SUS. Considerou-se que as evidências são favoráveis ao implante de etonogestrel, mas que a ampla população proposta pelo demandante juntamente com o impacto orçamentário estimado dificultaria a incorporação desta tecnologia no SUS. ANÁLISE DE IMPACTO ORÇAMENTÁRIO DE ACORDO COM O SEGMENTO POPULACIONAL DELINEADO PELA SVS E PELA SAPS: A Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde (SVS) e a Secretaria de Atenção Primária à Saúde (SAPS) propuseram, na 92ª Reunião da Conitec, delinear um segmento da população que mais se beneficiaria com a possível incorporação do implante subdérmico de etonogestrel. De acordo com o levantamento, esta população seria compreendida por: mulheres usuárias de drogas; mulheres em situação de rua; mulheres vivendo com HIV; mulheres em idade fértil e em uso de talidomida; mulheres privadas de liberdade; mulheres cis trabalhadoras do sexo e mulheres em idade fértil em tratamento com tuberculose e em uso de aminoglicosídeos. Desta forma, o quantitativo apresentado desta população foi de 356.381 indivíduos. Desconsiderando os custos da gravidez não planejada, o percentual de uso do implante subdérmico de etonogestrel no cenário base e atualizando os custos de alguns métodos contraceptivos, o novo cenário apresentou um incremento de R$ 1.747.690,30 no primeiro ano e de R$ 5.580.520,95 no quinto ano. Ao final de cinco anos, o impacto orçamentário incremental de uma possível incorporação do implante subdérmico de etonogestrel no SUS para o segmento populacional proposto foi de R$ 17.710.388,26. CONSULTA PÚBLICA: A consulta pública (CP) nº 01/2021 foi realizada entre os dias 12/01/2021 a 01/02/2021. Foram recebidas 191 contribuições, sendo 72 pelo formulário para contribuições técnico-científico e 119 pelo formulário para contribuições sobre experiência ou opinião de pacientes, familiares, amigos ou cuidadores de pacientes, profissionais de saúde ou pessoas interessadas no tema. De um modo geral, os participantes da CP discordaram da recomendação preliminar da Conitec. As contribuições versaram sobre a eficácia, a efetividade e a segurança do implante de etonogestrel, além dassuas altastaxas de continuação e satisfação das usuárias. O desejo de se ampliar os contraceptivos disponíveis no SUS e de favorecer o planejamento familiar também foi mencionado. Outro ponto muito destacado foi acerca do benefício do implante hormonal para um grupo mais vulnerável da população. A redução no número de gravidez não planejada também foi amplamente considerada nas participações, e os seus custos foram atribuídos de forma intercalada entre indivíduo, SUS e sociedade. Por fim, conclui-se que as contribuições recebidas na CP sobre o implante subdérmico de etonogestrel para prevenção da gravidez não planejada por mulheres adultas em idade reprodutiva, entre 18 e 49 anos, foram importantes e evidenciaram o desejo de que este método pudesse ser disponibilizado a um subgrupo mais vulnerável da população. RECOMENDAÇÃO FINAL DA CONITEC: Os membros do Plenário presentes na 95ª Reunião Ordinária da Conitec, no dia 03 de março de 2021, deliberaram, por maioria simples, sem nenhuma declaração de conflito de interesses, recomendar a incorporação, condicionada à criação de programa específico, do implante subdérmico de etonogestrel na prevenção da gravidez não planejada por mulheres em idade fértil: em situação de rua; com HIV/AIDS e em uso de dolutegravir; em uso de talidomida; privadas de liberdade; cis trabalhadoras do sexo; e em tratamento de tuberculose, usando aminoglicosídeos. Considerou-se que as evidências são favoráveis ao implante de etonogestrel e que o segmento da população delineada pela SVS e pela SAPS seria a que mais se beneficiaria do implante subdérmico de etonogestrel. Foi assinado o Registro de Deliberação nº 594/2021. DECISÃO: Incorporar o implante subdérmico de etonogestrel, condicionada à criação de programa específico, na prevenção da gravidez não planejada para mulheres em idade fértil: em situação de rua; com HIV/AIDS em uso de dolutegravir; em uso de talidomida; privadas de liberdade; trabalhadoras do sexo; e em tratamento de tuberculose em uso de aminoglicosídeos, no âmbito do Sistema Único de Saúde ­ SUS, conforme Portaria nº 13, publicada no Diário Oficial da União nº 74, seção 1, página 235, em 22 de abril de 2021.

Factors Associated With Delayed Contraceptive Implant Removal in Ethiopia.

BACKGROUND: In 2009, the Government of Ethiopia initiated the implant scale-up initiative, which expanded contraceptive access by training health extension workers (HEWs) to insert single-rod etonogestrel contraceptive implants (Implanon) at rural health posts. Removals were provided by referrals to higher levels of the health system. However, little was known about whether women were getting their implants removed at the recommended 3-year postinsertion date or what barriers they faced to removal. METHODS: Between June and July 2016, 1,860 Ethiopian women, who had a 1-rod etonogestrel implant inserted by either an HEW or another health care provider between 3 and 6 years prior, were surveyed. We describe the characteristics of the sample and use multivariable logistic regression to predict factors associated with keeping implants inserted beyond 3 years. RESULTS: Women who had received their implants from HEWs were significantly more likely to report keeping them inserted for more than 3 years (adjusted odds ratio=2.50; 95% confidence interval=1.19, 5.24), compared with those who got their implant from another health care provider. Women who reported distance to the facility or transportation as a barrier were also significantly more likely to keep their implant for more than 3 years. Married and educated women were less likely to keep their implants for an extended duration. Among women who had their implant for 3 years or less, women who had had it inserted by an HEW were significantly more likely to report that the provider was unable or refused to provide removal as a barrier. DISCUSSION: Efforts to expand lower level and community-based access to contraceptive implants that do not ensure reliable access to removals at the same level as insertions may lead to women using implants beyond the recommended duration.

What Goes In Must Come Out: A Mixed-Method Study of Access to Contraceptive Implant Removal Services in Ghana.

BACKGROUND: Access to quality removal services is a key component of informed choice in contraceptive implant use; however, limited data exist on users' access to removal services. In Ghana, implants are available across the country and are the most commonly used contraceptive method among married women. METHODS: From October 2017 and January 2018, we conducted a phone survey with a stratified random sample of 1,159 women who had obtained an implant from a public-sector Ghana Health Service clinic in 2 regions and 1,073 women who had an implant inserted through Marie Stopes International Ghana (MSIG) mobile outreach in 2 other regions. We also interviewed 50 women just after receiving an implant removal from MSIG. We conducted follow-up in-depth interviews with 20 implant acceptors and 15 implant providers across the 4 study regions. RESULTS: More than four-fifths of women in both service delivery contexts knew that their implant could be removed before its labeled duration. Nearly half of public sector clients and one-third of outreach clients reported that their provider only told them of removal access at the place of insertion. Among women obtaining their implant in the public and outreach sectors, respectively, 32% and 21% reported ever wanting it removed and 61% and 55% who attempted removal obtained a removal on the first attempt. An additional 17% in each context were successful in having their implant removed within 1 week of the first attempt. Most women obtained removal from the same place they received their insertion (81% public, 70% outreach). Most women reported their overall removal experience was very or somewhat easy (74% public, 68% outreach). Challenges included cost, provider availability, interactions with providers, and difficult removals. CONCLUSIONS: Access to implant removal is not universal in Ghana. Strengthening removal services in both the public and outreach sectors is needed to ensure comprehensive access.

Predictors of the usage of contraceptive implants among women of reproductive age in Ondo State, Southwest Nigeria.

BACKGROUND: A major characteristic of all developing countries is rapid population growth which is due to high fertility, birth rates and poor utilization of contraceptive methods. This study therefore assessed the predictors of contraceptive implants utilization among women of reproductive age in Ondo State, Nigeria. METHODS: A descriptive cross-sectional study design was used and a total of 230 women were selected by multi-stage sampling technique. Questionnaire administration was interviewer-based majority of the women could not read. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS version 23. Research questions and hypotheses were answered and tested with descriptive statistics (frequency, percentages), chi-square test of significance and binary logistic regression. Levels of significance was set at p ≤ 0.05. RESULTS: The prevalence of contraceptive utilization (any method) and contraceptive implant utilization were 92.2% and 31.1% respectively. Variables such as education (χ2 = 6.91, p = 0.03) and lack of counseling from providers (χ2 = 5.05, p = 0.03) were significantly associated with the utilization of contraceptive implant. These two variables were also the predictors of contraceptive implant utilization. Women with secondary and tertiary education have higher odds of utilizing contraceptive implants (OR = 1.21, 95% CI = 1.01-7.82, p = 0.04) and (OR = 2.53, 95% CI = 1.49-11.47, p = 0.03) compared to women who had primary or no education while those who claimed to be adequately counseled by providers are about two times more likely to use contraceptive implants (OR = 2.33, 95% CI = 1.08-5.51). CONCLUSION: This study showed the important role of education and health workers in providing information about contraceptive implants. Therefore, health workers' knowledge of family planning counseling and services should be constantly upgraded so as to improve their roles in educating, mobilizing, counseling the women regarding contraceptive implant insertion.

Free-of-charge long-acting reversible contraception: two-year discontinuation, its risk factors, and reasons.

BACKGROUND: Since 2013, the residents of the city of Vantaa, Finland, have been offered their first long-acting reversible contraceptive method (levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system, implant, and copper intrauterine device) free of charge. OBJECTIVE: The primary aim of this study was to assess the 2-year cumulative discontinuation rates of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods when provided free of charge for first-time users in a real-world setting. Additional aims were to describe factors associated with discontinuation and to evaluate the reasons for discontinuation. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective register-based cohort study of 2026 nonsterilized women aged 15 to 44 years, who initiated a free-of-charge long-acting contraceptive method in 2013-2014 in the city of Vantaa. Removals within 2 years after method initiation and reasons for discontinuation were obtained from electronic health records and from national registers. We calculated the 2-year cumulative incidence rates of discontinuation with 95% confidence intervals for each method. Furthermore, we assessed crude and adjusted incidence rate ratios of discontinuation with 95% confidence interval by Poisson regression models comparing implants and copper intrauterine device with levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine systems. RESULTS: During the 2 -year follow-up, 514 women discontinued, yielding a cumulative discontinuation rate of 28.3 per 100 women-years (95% confidence interval, 26.2-30.4). Among the 1199 women who initiated the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system, the cumulative discontinuation rate was 24.2 per 100 women-years (95% confidence interval, 21.7-26.9); among the 642 implant users, 33.3 per 100 women-years (95% confidence interval, 29.5-37.4); and among the 185 copper intrauterine device users, 37.8 per 100 women-years (95% confidence interval, 31.0-45.7). Compared with women aged 30 to 44 years, women aged 15 to 19 years (adjusted incidence rate ratio, 1.58; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-2.14) and 20 to 29 years (adjusted incidence rate ratio, 1.35; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-1.63) were more likely to discontinue. We observed a higher discontinuation rate in women who had given birth within the previous year (adjusted incidence rate ratio, 1.36; 95% confidence interval, 1.13-1.65), spoke a native language other than Finnish or Swedish (adjusted incidence rate ratio, 1.31; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-1.63), and had a history of a sexually transmitted infection (adjusted incidence rate ratio, 1.62; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-2.46). No association was found in marital status, overall parity, history of induced abortion, socioeconomic status, education level, or smoking status. The most common reason for discontinuation was bleeding disturbances, reported by 21% of women who discontinued the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system, by 71% who discontinued the implant, and by 41% who discontinued the copper intrauterine device. One in 4 women who discontinued the copper intrauterine device reported heavy menstrual bleeding, whereas only 1% who discontinued the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system and none who discontinued implants reported this reason. Abdominal pain was the reported reason for discontinuation in 20% of both intrauterine device users and in only 2% who discontinued implants. CONCLUSION: At 2 years, the use of implants and copper intrauterine devices was more likely to be discontinued than that of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system. Women younger than 30 years and those who gave birth in the preceding year, spoke a native language other than Finnish or Swedish, or had a history of sexually transmitted infections were more likely to discontinue. The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system was least likely to be removed owing to bleeding disturbances.

Scaling Up Access to Implants: A Summative Evaluation of the Implants Access Program.

The Implants Access Program (IAP) was a partnership between public and private organizations that aimed to increase access to contraceptive implants for women in low-income countries. The partnership began with 2 volume guarantee agreements that reduced the price of implants by approximately 50% and was complemented by efforts to address supply chain, service delivery, and knowledge and awareness barriers. We conducted a summative evaluation to identify key insights related to the IAP's relevance, effectiveness, and sustainability. We completed a desk review of program materials and published literature, followed by 42 in-depth interviews, including global stakeholders and country stakeholders in 3 case example countries: Kenya, Nigeria, and Uganda. The evaluation found evidence of increased access to implants including a 10-fold increase in procurement between 2010 and 2018 and an increase in prevalence of contraceptive implants during this same period. The IAP leveraged global family planning efforts taking place at the time, and its partnerships offered a business case for manufacturers to support increased access to implants. Enhanced supply chain visibility and coordination helped limit country-level stock-outs, and the IAP built on existing in-country delivery capacity. Although the IAP was able to address key challenges due to its effective collaboration and coordination at global and country levels, sustaining progress requires institutionalized mechanisms to continue global efforts and long-term assurances that the low price of implants will be maintained. Over 6 years, the IAP supported tremendous progress in increasing access to implants for women in low-income countries by building a public- and private-sector collaboration that focused on systems change in the family planning field. This partnership matched a unique response to a unique problem: building tools, systems, and capacity that can inform and support the introduction and scale-up of new and underutilized contraceptive methods.

Perceived Barriers to Contraceptive Access and Acceptance among Reproductive-Age Women Receiving Opioid Agonist Therapy in Northeast Tennessee.

OBJECTIVES: Women with substance use disorders experience unique challenges to contraceptive obtainment and user-dependent method adherence, contributing to higher than average rates of unintended pregnancy. This study estimated the prevalence of barriers to contraception and their associations with contraceptive use and unwanted pregnancies among women receiving opioid agonist therapy (OAT) in northeast Tennessee. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was piloted among female patients aged 18 to 55 years from 2 OAT clinics. Logistic regression was used to evaluate associations between contraceptive barriers and current contraceptive use and previous unwanted pregnancies among women receiving OAT. RESULTS: Of 91 participants, most experienced previous pregnancies (97.8%), with more than half reporting unwanted pregnancies (52.8%). Although 60% expressed a strong desire to avoid pregnancy, ambivalence toward becoming pregnant was common (30.0%). Most experienced ≥1 barriers to contraceptive use or obtainment (75.8%), the most prevalent being aversion to adverse effects (53.8%), healthcare provider stigmatization (30.7%), scheduled appointment compliance (30.3%), and prohibitive cost (25.0%). Experience of any contraceptive barrier (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 8.64, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.03-36.79) and access to a contraceptive provider (AOR 5.01, 95% CI 1.34-18.77) were positively associated with current use of prescribed contraceptives, whereas prohibitive cost was negatively associated (AOR 0.28, 95% CI 0.08-0.94). CONCLUSIONS: Although most participants desired to avoid pregnancy, ambivalence or uncertainty of pregnancy intention was common. Most experienced barriers to contraception, which were more strongly associated with previous unwanted pregnancy than current contraceptive use. The provision of long-acting reversible contraceptives and contraceptive education at OAT clinics represents an opportunity to reduce the incidence of neonatal abstinence syndrome.

Comparison of two techniques used in routine care for the treatment of inflammatory macular oedema, subconjunctival triamcinolone injection and intravitreal dexamethasone implant: medical and economic importance of this randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Whether they are injected peri- or intraocularly, corticosteroids are still essential tools in the therapeutic arsenal for treating inflammatory macular oedema. A few years ago, however, only triamcinolone acetonide was available to ophthalmologists. While this compound was initially developed for rheumatological or dermatological use, it has been increasingly deployed in ophthalmology, despite still being off-label. In 2011, the system for delivery of dexamethasone from a biodegradable, injectable implant into the vitreous cavity obtained approval for use in inflammatory macular oedema. While the efficacy and safety of triamcinolone in macular oedema, including inflammatory oedema, have already been studied, there are currently no publications on subconjunctival triamcinolone injections, which are simple, effective and well tolerated. To date, the dexamethasone 700 µg implant has been authorized for the treatment of noninfectious intermediate and posterior uveitis, but there have been no studies to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the different peri- and intraocular strategies, including the treatment of inflammatory macular oedema. METHODS: This protocol is therefore designed to compare the efficacy and safety of peri- and intraocular corticosteroid injections in the treatment of inflammatory macular oedema. In this ongoing study, 142 patients will be included, and the oedematous eye will be randomised to treatment with either subconjunctival triamcinolone injection or an intravitreal implant containing 700 µg dexamethasone. Follow-up is planned for 6 months with monthly visits. Each visit will include visual acuity measurement, a slit lamp examination, fundoscopy, intraocular pressure measurement, laser flare measurement (if available) and spectral domain optical coherence tomography. DISCUSSION: The results of this trial will have a real impact on public health if it is shown that a Kenacort retard® (i.e. triamcinolone) injection costing just €2.84 and performed in the physician's office (with no additional overhead costs) is at least as effective as the dexamethasone 700 µg implant (Ozurdex®; costing approximately €960 with the injection performed in a dedicated room), with no increased side effects. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02556424. Registered on 22 September 2015.

How Have Intravitreal Anti-VEGF and Dexamethasone Implant Been Used in Italy? A Multiregional, Population-Based Study in the Years 2010-2016.

PURPOSE: To describe intravitreal anti-VEGF drug and dexamethasone use in four Italian regions. METHODS: Four regional claims databases were used to measure drug prevalence, compare dosing intervals to those recommended in the summary of product characteristics (SPC), and identify switchers. Bilateral treatment and diabetic macular edema (DME) coding algorithms were validated, linking claims with a sample of prospectively collected ophthalmological data. RESULTS: Overall, 41,836 patients received ≥1 study drug in 2010-2016 (4.8 per 10,000 persons). In 2016, anti-VEGF drug use ranged from 0.8 (Basilicata) to 5.7 (Lombardy) per 10,000 persons while intravitreal dexamethasone use ranged from 0.2 (Basilicata) to 1.4 (Lombardy) per 10,000 persons. Overall, 40,815 persons were incident users of study drugs. Among incident users with ≥1 year of follow-up (N = 30,745), 16.0% (N = 30,745), 16.0% (N = 30,745), 16.0% (. CONCLUSION: Study drug use increased over time in Lombardy, Basilicata, Calabria, and Sicily, despite a large heterogeneity in prevalence of use across regions. Drug treatment appeared to be partly in line with SPC, suggesting that improvement in clinical practice may be needed to maximize drug benefits.