Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 20
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Natl Cancer Inst ; 113(3): 282-291, 2021 03 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33227816

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Whether social determinants of health are associated with survival in the context of pediatric oncology-targeted immunotherapy trials is not known. We examined the association between poverty and event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) for children with high-risk neuroblastoma treated in targeted immunotherapy trials. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 371 children with high-risk neuroblastoma treated with GD2-targeted immunotherapy in the Children's Oncology Group trial ANBL0032 or ANBL0931 at a Pediatric Health Information System center from 2005 to 2014. Neighborhood poverty exposure was characterized a priori as living in a zip code with a median household income within the lowest quartile for the cohort. Household poverty exposure was characterized a priori as sole coverage by public insurance. Post hoc analyses examined the joint effect of neighborhood and household poverty using a common reference. All statistical tests were 2-sided. RESULTS: In multivariable Cox regressions adjusted for disease and treatment factors, household poverty-exposed children experienced statistically significantly inferior EFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.28 to 2.82, P = .001) and OS (HR = 2.79, 95% CI = 1.63 to 4.79, P < .001) compared with unexposed children. Neighborhood poverty was not independently associated with EFS or OS. In post hoc analyses exploring the joint effect of neighborhood and household poverty, children with dual-poverty exposure (neighborhood poverty and household poverty) experienced statistically significantly inferior EFS (HR = 2.21, 95% CI = 1.48 to 3.30, P < .001) and OS (HR = 3.70, 95% CI = 2.08 to 6.59, P < .001) compared with the unexposed group. CONCLUSIONS: Poverty is independently associated with increased risk of relapse and death among neuroblastoma patients treated with targeted immunotherapy. Incorporation of social and environmental factors in future trials as health-care delivery intervention targets may increase the benefit of targeted therapies.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Imunoterapia/economia , Neuroblastoma/tratamento farmacológico , Neuroblastoma/economia , Pobreza/estatística & dados numéricos , Anticorpos Monoclonais/administração & dosagem , Anticorpos Monoclonais/economia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/economia , Ensaios Clínicos Fase III como Assunto , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Imunoterapia/métodos , Imunoterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Lactente , Isotretinoína/administração & dosagem , Isotretinoína/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto , Neuroblastoma/mortalidade , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Características de Residência/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
2.
JAMA Netw Open ; 3(9): e2015656, 2020 09 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32876684

RESUMO

Importance: Strides to improve survival in metastatic melanoma have been made with the use of immunotherapeutic agents in the form of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Objective: To examine the factors associated with immunotherapy receipt in patients with metastatic melanoma in the era of immune checkpoint inhibitors and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used data on 9882 patients with metastatic melanoma diagnosed from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2016, from the National Cancer Database. Patients who did not have documentation regarding immunotherapy receipt were excluded. Data analysis was performed from July 1, 2019, to December 15, 2019. Exposure: Receipt of immunotherapy. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the association of receipt of immunotherapy as first-line therapy with sociodemographic factors. The secondary outcome was overall survival by receipt of immunotherapy. Results: A total of 9512 patients (mean [SD] age, 65.1 [14.4] years; 6481 [68.1%] male; 9217 [96.9%] White) met the criteria for treatment analysis. A total of 3428 (36.0%) received immunotherapy, and 6084 (64.0%) did not. Increasing age (odds ratio [OR], 0.98; 95% CI, 0.97-0.98; P < .001) and increasing Charlson-Deyo comorbidity index (OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.80-0.92; P < .001) were associated with lower odds of receiving immunotherapy on regression analysis. Diagnosis in Medicaid expansion states (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.05-1.27; P = .003), treatment at an academic or integrated cancer network program (OR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.45-1.75; P < .001), and residence within the highest quartile of high school graduation rate zip code area (OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.09-1.56; P = .003) were associated with an increased likelihood of receiving immunotherapy. Median overall survival was 10.1 months (95% CI, 9.6-10.6 months) among all patients. Patients who received first-line immunotherapy had a median overall survival of 18.4 months (95% CI, 16.6-20.1 months) compared with 7.5 months (95% CI, 7.0-7.9 months) (P < .001) among patients who did not. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, patients who received immunotherapy for metastatic melanoma had improved overall survival. Residence in Medicaid expansion states, younger age, low comorbidity index, care at academic medical centers or integrated network cancer programs, and residence in zip codes within the highest quartile of high school graduation were associated with an increased likelihood of receiving immunotherapy. Recognizing sociodemographic associations with treatment receipt is important to identify potential barriers to treatment.


Assuntos
Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/uso terapêutico , Imunoterapia , Melanoma , Metástase Neoplásica , Demografia , Feminino , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Imunoterapia/métodos , Imunoterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Melanoma/epidemiologia , Melanoma/patologia , Melanoma/terapia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Metástase Neoplásica/patologia , Metástase Neoplásica/prevenção & controle , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Análise de Sobrevida , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
4.
JAMA Netw Open ; 2(5): e193242, 2019 05 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31050778

RESUMO

Importance: Commercial epicutaneous peanut immunotherapy (EPIT) and peanut oral immunotherapy (POIT) may offer significant quality-of-life improvements for patients with peanut allergy, but the cost-effectiveness of commercial peanut immunotherapies is uncharacterized. Objective: To evaluate critical inputs associated with the cost-effectiveness of EPIT and POIT from a societal perspective. Design, Setting, and Participants: Economic evaluation in which microsimulations with Markov modeling were performed evaluating virtual children aged 4 years over an 80-year time horizon. The base-case costs included a caregiver-reported willingness to pay of $3839 annually for safe and effective food allergy treatment. Estimates of predictive biomarkers or oral challenges were incorporated after the first year of therapy with additional analyses of immunotherapy risk reduction of anaphylaxis and probability of sustained unresponsiveness (SU) to peanut after 4 years. Exposures: Children received EPIT, POIT, or no immunotherapy treatment (n = 10 000 per treatment strategy). Main Outcomes and Measures: Rates of therapy-associated adverse reactions and quality-of-life improvements associated with changes in eliciting or tolerated peanut doses were modeled along with quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), anaphylaxis, therapy-associated anaphylaxis, and fatalities. Results: In the base-case analysis without SU to peanut, the EPIT strategy cost less than POIT (mean [SD] cost, $154 662 [$46 716] vs $163 524 [$56 800]) and had fewer total episodes of anaphylaxis (mean [SD], 1.33 [1.55] vs 3.83 [5.02] episodes) and fewer episodes of therapy-associated anaphylaxis (mean [SD], 0.62 [1.30] vs 3.10 [4.94] episodes) but had lower QALY accumulation (mean [SD], 26.932 [2.241] vs 26.945 [2.320] QALYs). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $216 061 for EPIT and $255 431 for POIT. Models were sensitive to therapy cost, SU rates, health state utility, and risk reduction of anaphylaxis. With health state utility sensitivity analyses, the ceiling value-based cost (willingness-to-pay threshold $100 000/QALY) was between $1568 and $6568 for EPIT and between $1235 and $5235 for POIT. If high rates of SU to peanut can be achieved in longer-term models, EPIT and POIT could produce savings in terms of both cost and QALY. Conclusions and Relevance: In this simulated analysis, findings showed that EPIT and POIT may be cost-effective under some assumptions. Further research is needed to understand the degree of health state utility improvement associated with each therapy, degree of protection against anaphylaxis, and rates of SU.


Assuntos
Anafilaxia/economia , Dessensibilização Imunológica/economia , Dessensibilização Imunológica/estatística & dados numéricos , Imunoterapia/economia , Imunoterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Hipersensibilidade a Amendoim/tratamento farmacológico , Hipersensibilidade a Amendoim/economia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Arachis/imunologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Análise Custo-Benefício/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem
6.
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) ; 47(1): 64-72, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30245286

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Component resolved diagnosis (CRD) allows to precisely identify the sensitization to specific molecules of a given allergenic source, resulting in an important improvement in clinical management, particularly of polysensitized subjects. This will end in the correct prescription of allergen immunotherapy (AIT) for respiratory allergy and in adequate avoidance diets or prescription of self-injectable adrenaline in food allergy. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this multicenter, real life study is to evaluate the percentage change of the diagnostic-therapeutic choice in polysensitized patients with respiratory allergy and in patients with food allergy, after using CRD compared to a first level diagnosis, along with an economic analysis of the patient's overall management according to the two different approaches. METHODS: An overall number of 462 polysensitized patients, as suggested by skin prick tests (SPT), and with clinical symptoms related to a respiratory (275 pts) or food (187 pts) allergy, were recruited. All patients underwent CRD for specific IgE against food or inhalant recombinant molecules, which were chosen according to medical history and positivity to SPT. The first diagnostic-therapeutic hypothesis, based only on medical history and SPT, was recorded for each patient while the final diagnostic-therapeutic choice was based on the results from CRD. The rate of change of the diagnostic-therapeutic choice from the first hypothesis to the final choice was statistically evaluated. The economic impact of CRD on the overall management of the allergic patients was analyzed to evaluate whether the increase in the diagnostic costs would be compensated and eventually exceeded by savings coming from the improved diagnostic-therapeutic appropriateness. RESULTS: An approximate 50% change (k index 0.54) in the prescription of AIT for respiratory allergy as well as a change in the prescription of self-injectable adrenaline (k index 0.56) was measured; an overall saving of financial resources along with a higher diagnostic-therapeutic appropriateness was also detected. CONCLUSION: There is moderate agreement concerning prescription of AIT and self-injectable adrenaline before and after performing CRD: this highlights the usefulness of CRD, at least in polysensitized patients, in indicating the risk assessment and therefore the correct therapy of respiratory and food allergy, which results in a cost-saving approach.


Assuntos
Asma/diagnóstico , Uso de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/diagnóstico , Imunoterapia/economia , Patologia Molecular/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Asma/epidemiologia , Asma/terapia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos de Coortes , Custos e Análise de Custo , Epinefrina/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/epidemiologia , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/terapia , Humanos , Imunoterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Lactente , Itália/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Melhoria de Qualidade , Testes Cutâneos
7.
Eur J Cancer ; 105: 33-40, 2018 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30384014

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Since 2011, significant progress was observed in metastatic melanoma (MM), with the commercialisation of seven immunotherapies or targeted therapies, which showed significant improvement in survival. In France, in 2004, the cost of MM was estimated at €1634 per patient; this cost has not been re-estimated since. This study provided an update on survival and cost in real-life clinical practice. METHODS: Clinical and economic data (treatments, hospitalisations, radiotherapy sessions, visits, imaging and biological exams) were extracted from the prospective MelBase cohort, collecting individual data in 955 patients in 26 hospitals, from diagnosis of metastatic disease until death. Survival was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Costs were calculated from the health insurance perspective using French tariffs. For live patients, survival and costs were extrapolated using a multistate model, describing the 5-year course of the disease according to patient prognostic factors and number of treatment lines. RESULTS: Since the availability of new drugs, the mean survival time of MM patients has increased to 23.6 months (95%confidence interval [CI] :21.2;26.6), with 58% of patients receiving a second line of treatment. Mean management costs increased to €269,682 (95%CI:244,196;304,916) per patient. Drugs accounted for 80% of the total cost. CONCLUSION: This study is the first that evaluated the impact of immunotherapies and targeted therapies both on survival and cost in real-life conditions. Alongside the introduction of breakthrough therapies in the first and subsequent lines, MM has been associated with a significant increase in survival but also in costs, raising the question of financial sustainability.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Melanoma/tratamento farmacológico , Terapias em Estudo/economia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antineoplásicos/economia , Estudos de Coortes , Análise Custo-Benefício , Custos de Medicamentos , Feminino , França , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Custos Hospitalares , Humanos , Imunoterapia/economia , Imunoterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Melanoma/economia , Melanoma/mortalidade , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Terapia de Alvo Molecular/economia , Terapia de Alvo Molecular/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Prospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Terapias em Estudo/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto Jovem
8.
Bull Math Biol ; 80(9): 2349-2377, 2018 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30073567

RESUMO

Immune interventions consisting in repeated injections are broadly used as they are thought to improve the quantity and the quality of the immune response. However, they also raise several questions that remain unanswered, in particular the number of injections to make or the delay to respect between different injections to achieve this goal. Practical and financial considerations add constraints to these questions, especially in the framework of human studies. We specifically focus here on the use of interleukin-7 (IL-7) injections in HIV-infected patients under antiretroviral treatment, but still unable to restore normal levels of [Formula: see text] T lymphocytes. Clinical trials have already shown that repeated cycles of injections of IL-7 could help maintaining [Formula: see text] T lymphocytes levels over the limit of 500 cells/[Formula: see text]L, by affecting proliferation and survival of [Formula: see text] T cells. We then aim at answering the question: how to maintain a patients level of [Formula: see text] T lymphocytes by using a minimum number of injections (i.e., optimizing the strategy of injections)? Based on mechanistic models that were previously developed for the dynamics of [Formula: see text] T lymphocytes in this context, we model the process by a piecewise deterministic Markov model. We then address the question by using some recently established theory on impulse control problem in order to develop a numerical tool determining the optimal strategy. Results are obtained on a reduced model, as a proof of concept: the method allows to define an optimal strategy for a given patient. This method could be applied to optimize injections schedules in clinical trials.


Assuntos
Infecções por HIV/imunologia , Infecções por HIV/terapia , Interleucina-7/administração & dosagem , Algoritmos , Fármacos Anti-HIV/uso terapêutico , Contagem de Linfócito CD4 , Linfócitos T CD4-Positivos/imunologia , Terapia Combinada , Simulação por Computador , Relação Dose-Resposta Imunológica , Esquema de Medicação , Infecções por HIV/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Imunoterapia/métodos , Imunoterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Interleucina-7/uso terapêutico , Cadeias de Markov , Conceitos Matemáticos , Modelos Imunológicos , Proteínas Recombinantes/administração & dosagem , Proteínas Recombinantes/uso terapêutico
9.
Eur J Cancer ; 75: 313-322, 2017 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28264791

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Despite the efficacy of innovative treatments for metastatic melanoma, their high costs has led to disparities in cancer care among different European countries. We analysed the availability of these innovative therapies in Europe and estimated the number of patients without access to first-line recommended treatment per current guidelines of professional entities such as the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), the European Association of Dermato-Oncology (EADO), and European Dermatology Forum (EDF). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Web-based online survey was conducted in 30 European countries with questions about the treatment schedules from 1st May 2015 to 1st May 2016: number of metastatic melanoma patients, registration and reimbursement of innovative medicines (updated data, as of 1st October 2016), percentage of patients treated and availability of clinical studies and compassionate-use programmes. RESULTS: The recommended BRAF inhibitor (BRAFi) + MEK inhibitor (MEKi) combination was both registered and fully reimbursed in 9/30 (30%) countries, and in 13/30 (43%) (all from Eastern Europe) not reimbursed. First-line immunotherapy with anti-PD1 antibodies was registered and fully reimbursed in 14/30 (47%) countries, while in 13/30 (43%) (all from Eastern Europe) not reimbursed. It was estimated that in Europe 19,600 patients with metastatic melanoma are treated, and 5238 (27%) do not have access to recommended first-line therapy. Significant correlation was found between human development index (HDI, UNDP report 2015), (r = 0.662; p < 0.001), health expenditure per capita (r = 0.695; p < 0.001) and the Mackenbach score of health policy performance (r = 0.765; p < 0.001) with the percentage of patients treated with innovative medicines and a number of reimbursed medicines. CONCLUSIONS: Great discrepancy exists in metastatic melanoma treatment across Europe. It is crucial to increase the awareness of national and European policymakers, oncological societies, melanoma patients' associations and pharma industry.


Assuntos
Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Melanoma/terapia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/terapia , Terapias em Estudo/estatística & dados numéricos , Acrilonitrila/análogos & derivados , Acrilonitrila/economia , Acrilonitrila/provisão & distribuição , Compostos de Anilina/economia , Compostos de Anilina/provisão & distribuição , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/economia , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Feminino , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/economia , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/economia , Humanos , Imunoterapia/economia , Imunoterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Melanoma/economia , Melanoma/epidemiologia , Receptor de Morte Celular Programada 1/antagonistas & inibidores , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas B-raf/antagonistas & inibidores , Mecanismo de Reembolso/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Cutâneas/economia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/epidemiologia , Terapias em Estudo/economia
10.
J Zhejiang Univ Sci B ; 16(7): 640-50, 2015 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26160722

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The specialty of allergy developed quickly in western countries because of the rapid increase of allergic diseases, whereas it developed relatively slowly in China. The prevalence of allergen sensitization and allergic diseases in Zhejiang Province of China is high and improving the medical services for these diseases is critically needed. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the working status of the diagnosis and treatment of allergic diseases, including doctor resources, diagnostic methods, and allergen-specific immunotherapy in patients of Zhejiang Province, and to provide instructions for the strategic development of subspecialties of allergic diseases. METHODS: First we defined the doctors who treat allergic diseases, and designed a comprehensive questionnaire to collect personal and hospital information for these doctors. The questionnaires were distributed to hospitals with different ranks and from different areas in the province. The general condition of doctor's resources, carryout of diagnostic methods, and allergen-specific immunotherapy were described and variations in the different specialties, hospitals, and areas were further analyzed. RESULTS: Doctors in their thirties with bachelor's degrees were the mainstream for diagnosing and treating allergic diseases. The main specialties of the doctor resources were the specialties of Ear, Nose and Throat (ENT), Respirology, Pediatrics, and Dermatology. The Pediatrics specialty had a more reasonable infrastructure of doctor resources with more young doctors working in this subspecialty. The development of allergy subspecialty varied within hospitals at different levels or from different areas. The carryout of the skin prick test (SPT), serum specific IgE (ssIgE), and subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) was best performed in provincial hospitals, while sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) was prescribed most commonly in municipal hospitals. The performance of SPT and ssIgE in Hangzhou, Jiaxing, and Wenzhou areas was much better than that in other places. The performance of SCIT and SLIT was best in Wenzhou. CONCLUSIONS: Our survey revealed a very initial and unbalanced development for the allergy subspecialty in Zhejiang Province. Doctor resources for allergic diseases were mainly from the specialties of ENT, Respirology, and Pediatrics, and the performance of diagnosis and treatment was mainly focused on provincial and municipal hospitals. Continuous education of allergies could be extended to primary healthcare centers and more efforts should be directed to those areas with poor medical resources.


Assuntos
Alergia e Imunologia , Competência Clínica/estatística & dados numéricos , Setor de Assistência à Saúde , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hipersensibilidade/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidade/terapia , Adulto , Alergia e Imunologia/estatística & dados numéricos , China/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Hipersensibilidade/epidemiologia , Imunoterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Recursos Humanos
11.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 92(4): 721-31, 2015 Jul 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26104927

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Quality cancer care is best delivered through a multidisciplinary approach requiring awareness of current evidence for all oncologic specialties. The highest impact journals often disseminate such information, so the distribution and characteristics of oncology studies by primary intervention (local therapies, systemic therapies, and targeted agents) were evaluated in 10 high-impact journals over a 20-year period. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Articles published in 1994, 2004, and 2014 in New England Journal of Medicine, Lancet, Journal of the American Medical Association, Lancet Oncology, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Annals of Oncology, Radiotherapy and Oncology, International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, Annals of Surgical Oncology, and European Journal of Surgical Oncology were identified. Included studies were prospectively conducted and evaluated a therapeutic intervention. RESULTS: A total of 960 studies were included: 240 (25%) investigated local therapies, 551 (57.4%) investigated systemic therapies, and 169 (17.6%) investigated targeted therapies. More local therapy trials (n=185 [77.1%]) evaluated definitive, primary treatment than systemic (n=178 [32.3%]) or targeted therapy trials (n=38 [22.5%]; P<.001). Local therapy trials (n=16 [6.7%]) also had significantly lower rates of industry funding than systemic (n=207 [37.6%]) and targeted therapy trials (n=129 [76.3%]; P<.001). Targeted therapy trials represented 5 (2%), 38 (10.2%), and 126 (38%) of those published in 1994, 2004, and 2014, respectively (P<.001), and industry-funded 48 (18.9%), 122 (32.6%), and 182 (54.8%) trials, respectively (P<.001). Compared to publication of systemic therapy trial articles, articles investigating local therapy (odds ratio: 0.025 [95% confidence interval: 0.012-0.048]; P<.001) were less likely to be found in high-impact general medical journals. CONCLUSIONS: Fewer studies evaluating local therapies, such as surgery and radiation, are published in high-impact oncology and medicine literature. Further research and attention are necessary to guide efforts promoting appropriate representation of all oncology studies in high-impact, broad-readership journals.


Assuntos
Bibliometria , Cirurgia Geral/estatística & dados numéricos , Oncologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias/terapia , Publicações/estatística & dados numéricos , Radioterapia (Especialidade)/estatística & dados numéricos , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Antineoplásicos Hormonais/uso terapêutico , Quimiorradioterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Terapia Combinada/estatística & dados numéricos , Intervalos de Confiança , Indústria Farmacêutica/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Imunoterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Disseminação de Informação , Fator de Impacto de Revistas , Terapia de Alvo Molecular/estatística & dados numéricos , Razão de Chances , Probabilidade , Publicações/tendências , Radioterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Análise de Regressão , Projetos de Pesquisa/estatística & dados numéricos , Apoio à Pesquisa como Assunto/estatística & dados numéricos , Apoio à Pesquisa como Assunto/tendências , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
13.
Cancer Invest ; 28(1): 46-53, 2010 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19995227

RESUMO

We analyzed the utilization trend for immunotherapy as initial treatment in the United States and estimated the cost impact of three cancers for which the majority of newly approved immunotherapies were indicated: non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), metastatic breast cancer (MBC), and metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC). Utilization was highly concentrated, with four cancers accounting for 70-80% of use. On the basis of the pattern in 2004 (22.9% NHL, 3.2% MCRC, and 3.3% MBC), immunotherapy was associated with $285, $73, and $12 million cost increase for NHL, MCRC, and MBC, respectively. Costs for these cancers would have exceeded $1.82 billion had 50% of eligible patients received immunotherapy.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Mama/terapia , Neoplasias Colorretais/terapia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/tendências , Imunoterapia , Linfoma não Hodgkin/terapia , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/economia , Anticorpos Monoclonais/economia , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Mama/economia , Neoplasias da Mama/imunologia , Neoplasias da Mama/secundário , Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorretais/economia , Neoplasias Colorretais/imunologia , Neoplasias Colorretais/secundário , Custos de Medicamentos/tendências , Feminino , Humanos , Imunoterapia/economia , Imunoterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Imunoterapia/tendências , Linfoma não Hodgkin/diagnóstico , Linfoma não Hodgkin/economia , Linfoma não Hodgkin/imunologia , Masculino , Modelos Econômicos , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/tendências , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Sistema de Registros , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
15.
J Laryngol Otol ; 119(10): 799-805, 2005 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16259657

RESUMO

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a common condition which is treated using different modalities, including immunotherapy. The aim of this study was to survey the current management strategies among ENT consultants in the UK in treating AR, and their views on immunotherapy. The study design was a postal questionnaire survey and the setting a university teaching hospital. Participants were consultant members of the British Association of Otolaryngologists - Head and Neck Surgeons (BAO-HNS). The main outcome measures were common treatment modalities adopted by the survey group to treat AR, and the number of consultants practising immunotherapy. The majority (81.1 per cent) of the consultants surveyed practise medical therapy with or without surgery. Immunotherapy is advised by 26 per cent of ENT consultants, but only 6.6 per cent currently administer immunotherapy.


Assuntos
Imunoterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Rinite Alérgica Perene/terapia , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal/terapia , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Imunoterapia/efeitos adversos , Imunoterapia/métodos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Inquéritos e Questionários , Reino Unido
16.
J Drugs Dermatol ; 2(6): 649-54, 2003 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14711145

RESUMO

To compare the cost of several common modalities used to treat non-genital warts in immunocompetent patients, we identified studies published in English using standard search strategies and evaluated the literature for the following common non-genital wart therapies: cryotherapy with liquid nitrogen, carbon dioxide and pulsed-dye laser therapy, topical squaric acid, intralesional bleomycin, intralesional interferon alpha injections, and intralesional immunotherapy with Candida antigens. Standard treatment algorithms, compiled by dermatologists experienced in the treatment of patients with moderate wart burdens, were utilized for cost-comparison analyses. Based on the cost analysis model, the least expensive treatment option for non-genital warts were carbon dioxide laser therapy (157 dollars) and Candida antigen injections (190 dollars). The other treatment modalities examined ranged from 495 dollars (bleomycin) to 1227 dollars (interferon alpha). Although treatment with the carbon dioxide laser therapy is the least expensive, pain and post-procedure complications limit the use of this modality.


Assuntos
Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Verrugas/economia , Verrugas/terapia , Arkansas , Custos e Análise de Custo , Crioterapia/economia , Crioterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Fármacos Dermatológicos/economia , Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Imunoterapia/economia , Imunoterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Interferon-alfa/economia , Interferon-alfa/uso terapêutico , Terapia a Laser/economia , Terapia a Laser/estatística & dados numéricos , Modelos Econômicos
18.
Toxicon ; 36(11): 1503-6, 1998 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9792164

RESUMO

The immunotherapy was recently developed due to the improvement of purification techniques of antivenoms and results of the research in toxicology and pharmacology. The utilisation of highly purified IgG fragments leads to a better tolerance and a higher efficacy. Snake envenomations constitute in Africa, as in many tropical countries, an important public health problem. The annual incidence of snakebites reaches 1 million and the annual mortality is about 20,000 deaths. Less than 25% of the antivenom needs are effectively covered and, probably in most of envenomations, used at insufficient doses. The treatment of snakebites would be improved by better knowledge on snakebite epidemiology, standardisation of treatment and training medical staff, and development of new financial procedures for antivenom supply.


Assuntos
Imunoterapia , Mordeduras de Serpentes/terapia , África/epidemiologia , Antivenenos/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Fragmentos Fab das Imunoglobulinas/isolamento & purificação , Fragmentos Fab das Imunoglobulinas/uso terapêutico , Imunoterapia/economia , Imunoterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Incidência , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Mordeduras de Serpentes/economia , Mordeduras de Serpentes/epidemiologia , Venenos de Serpentes/imunologia , Falha de Tratamento
20.
Am J Public Health ; 70(2): 128-32, 1980 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7352606

RESUMO

Fewer than 20% of the 30,000 anti-rabies treatments administered in the United States each year are necessary. New Mexico established a comprehensive consultation-biologics program to assist physicians in making appropriate and systematic rabies treatment decisions. In 1978, 32 individuals received anti-rabies treatments as the result of 144 physician consultation requests. Dog and cat exposures accounted for 70 per cent of consultations and 63 per cent of the treatments. A seasonal peak of both consultations and treatments was observed in the summer and early autumn. The cost of biologics was $212 per treatment. Coordinated use of laboratory diagnostic services and animal control resources obviated the need for treatment in over 60 per cent of the 112 consultations not resulting in treatment. Experience in 1978 suggested that the system was probably responsible for a greater than five-fold reduction in the annual rate of anti-rabies treatments in New Mexico. Efficient physician utilization and high acceptability of the program may be attributed to maximization of private sector input into design and implementation of this public health program.


Assuntos
Imunoterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Administração em Saúde Pública/organização & administração , Vacina Antirrábica/uso terapêutico , Raiva/terapia , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Adulto , Animais , Mordeduras e Picadas/complicações , Criança , Custos e Análise de Custo , Educação Médica Continuada , Humanos , Imunoterapia/economia , New Mexico , Médicos de Família/educação , Raiva/transmissão , Vacina Antirrábica/efeitos adversos , Inquéritos e Questionários
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA