Neuroestimulación/neuromodulación sacra en incontinencia fecal y/o urinaria / Sacral neurostimulation/neuromodulation in fecal and/or urinary incontinence

CONTEXTO: La incontinencia urinaria (IU), o trastorno del vaciado vesical, se define como la incapacidad de mantener un control de la micción. Los trastornos del vaciado vesical se dividen en cuatro tipos generalmente, éstos son: IU de urgencia (generalmente asociado al síndrome de vejiga hiperactiva); IU de esfuerzo (pérdida de orina asociado al ejercicio, al toser o estornudar); IU mixta (combinación de las dos previas) y finalmente la IU por rebosamiento o retención urinaria no obstructiva. Las estimaciones de prevalencia de estas afectaciones varían debido a las diferencias en las definiciones, pero se ha reportado hasta un 55% en mujeres adultas. La IU de urgencia y la de esfuerzo son los tipos más frecuentes de IU crónica, con una prevalencia del 31% en mujeres mayores de 75 años y de 24 a 45% en mujeres mayores de 30 años, respectivamente. Tanto los hombres como las mujeres se ven afectados, siendo las mujeres más propensas a experimentar la incontinencia. TECNOLOGÍA: La neuromodulación sacra consiste en un generador de pulsos implantable que suministra impulsos eléctricos controlados. El dispositivo utilizado para conseguir la estimulación cuenta con un generador el cual está conectado a cables que conectan con los nervios sacros, generalmente a nivel de la raíz de S3. Dos componentes externos del dispositivo ayudan a controlar la estimulación eléctrica: um magneto de control es accionado por el paciente para prender y apagar el dispositivo y una consola programadora puede ser utilizada por el médico para ajustar los pulsos del generador. Los pacientes deben poder operar el dispositivo y llevar un diario de evacuaciones. OBJETIVO: El objetivo del presente informe es evaluar la evidencia disponible acerca de la eficacia, seguridad y aspectos relacionados a las políticas de cobertura del uso de neuroestimulación/ neuromodulador em incontinencia fecal y/o urinaria. MÉTODOS: Se realizó una búsqueda en las principales bases de datos bibliográficas, en buscadores genéricos de internet, y financiadores de salud. Se priorizó la inclusión de revisiones sistemáticas (RS), ensayos clínicos controlados aleatorizados (ECAs), evaluaciones de tecnologías sanitarias (ETS), evaluaciones económicas, guías de práctica clínica (GPC) y políticas de cobertura de diferentes sistemas de salud. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron cinco RS, tres estudios prospectivos no controlados, cinco GPC, una evaluación económica, y 26 informes de políticas de cobertura neuromodulación sacra en incontinencia fecal y/o urinaria. CONCLUSIÓN: Evidencia de moderada calidad sugiere que la terapia con neuromodulación sacra, en comparación con otras alternativas terapéuticas, podría reducir el número de eventos de incontinencia urinaria y mejorar la calidad de vida de adultos que han fallado a otras líneas de tratamiento conservador, estos resultados fueron observados en el corto y mediano plazo. Evidencia de moderada calidad sugiere que la terapia con neuromodulación sacra, en comparación con la estimulación del tibial posterior, podría reducir el número de eventos de incontinencia fecal en adultos que han fallado a otras líneas de tratamiento conservador, estos resultados fueron observados en el corto y mediano plazo. Evidencia de muy baja calidad no permite evaluar la eficacia y seguridad de neuromodulación sacra en pacientes pediátricos con incontinencia fecal. Evidencia de muy baja calidad, proveniente de dos series de casos, no permiten sacar conclusiones acerca de la eficacia y seguridad de la neuroestimulación sacra en pacientes adultos com coexistencia de incontinencia fecal y urinaria. Las guías de práctica clínica que han sido relevadas sobre incontinencia fecal o incontinência urinaria contemplan a la neuromodulación sacra como una alternativa terapéutica en tercera línea de tratamiento. Las políticas de cobertura que han sido relevadas en América Latina no mencionan la cobertura de esta tecnología. Los financiadores públicos de Francia, Australia, Estados Unidos, Reino Unido y los privados de Estados Unidos que han sido relevados brindan cobertura de esta tecnología para las dos indicaciones evaluadas. No se hallaron estudios económicos realizados en Argentina que permitan conocer la costo-efectividad y/o el impacto presupuestario de esta tecnología.

Mirabegron or tolterodine for the treatment of overactive bladder in Japan: Which drug is more cost-effective as the first-line treatment?

OBJECTIVES: To assess the cost-effectiveness of mirabegron 50 mg relative to tolterodine extended release 4 mg for the treatment of overactive bladder if used as the first-line treatment in Japan. METHODS: A Markov model was developed to simulate the cost-effectiveness of the mirabegron first-line treatment (and tolterodine second-line) versus tolterodine first-line treatment (and mirabegron second-line) taken for 5 years from the randomized European-Australian study (SCORPIO trial) and single technology appraisal assessment report by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated with utility value by quality-adjusted life year with cost using the medical fee and the drug price tariff in 2016. For the study of transition of treatment status, our analytical model was established. The transition probabilities of severity states were calculated based on the probabilities for the mean numbers of incontinence episodes/day and micturition episodes/day in mirabegron-treated and tolterodine-treated patients in the single technology appraisal assessment report. RESULTS: The 5-year expected effect per patient was 3.860 quality-adjusted life years for first-line mirabegron and 3.839 quality-adjusted life years for first-line tolterodine. The 5-year expected cost per patient was ¥526 191 for first-line mirabegron, and ¥472 390 for first-line tolterodine. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was ¥2 565 927/quality-adjusted life year. This value was below the willingness-to-pay threshold of ¥5 million/quality-adjusted life year. In more severe states, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio exceeded ¥5 million. CONCLUSIONS: First-line mirabegron appears to be more cost-effective than first-line tolterodine. In patients with severe symptoms, first-line mirabegron is not economically preferable.

Development of an overactive bladder assessment tool (BAT): A potential improvement to the standard bladder diary.

AIMS: To develop a comprehensive patient-reported bladder assessment tool (BAT) for assessing overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms, bother, impacts, and satisfaction with treatment. METHODS: Subjects were consented and eligibility was confirmed by a recruiting physician; subjects were then scheduled for in-person interviews. For concept elicitation and cognitive interviews, 30 and 20 subjects, respectively, were targeted for recruitment from US sites. All interviews were conducted face-to-face, audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, anonymized, and analyzed using a qualitative data analysis software program. A draft BAT was created based on the results of the concept elicitation interviews and further revised based on cognitive interviews as well as feedback from an advisory board of clinical and patient-reported outcome (PRO) experts. RESULTS: Nocturia, daytime frequency, and urgency were reported by all subjects (n = 30, 100.0%), and incontinence was reported by most subjects (n = 25, 83.3%). The most frequently reported impacts were waking up to urinate (n = 30, 100.0%), embarrassment/shame (n = 24, 80.0%), stress/anxiety (n = 23, 76.7%), and lack of control (n = 23, 76.7%). Following analysis, item generation, cognitive interviews, and advisory board feedback, the resulting BAT contains four hypothesized domains (symptom frequency, symptom bother, impacts, and satisfaction with treatment) and 17 items with a 7-day recall period. CONCLUSIONS: The BAT has been developed in multiple stages with input from both OAB patients and clinical experts following the recommended processes included in the FDA PRO Guidance for Industry. Once fully validated, we believe it will offer a superior alternative to use of the bladder diary and other PROs for monitoring OAB patients in clinical trials and clinical practice.

An investigation of factors predicting the type of bladder antimuscarinics initiated in Medicare nursing homes residents.

BACKGROUND: To examine factors predicting type of bladder antimuscarinics (BAM) initiated in nursing home (NH) residents. METHODS: Incident BAM initiators following NH admission were identified by constructing a retrospective cohort from Medicare files and Minimum Data Set (MDS). Participants included all residents 65 years and older admitted in Medicare-certified NH between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2008 who were prescribed BAM and had continuous Medicare (Part A, B, and D) enrollment. Patient characteristics, medications, and comorbidities were derived from Medicare enrollment and claims. NH characteristics and health status were derived from MDS assessments. The outcome was defined as type of BAM initiated after admission (selective, non-selective extended release, non-selective immediate release). Multinomial logistic regression using generalized estimating equation methodology determined which factors predicted the type of BAM initiated. RESULTS: Twelve thousand eight hundred ninety-nine NH residents initiating BAM therapy were identified; 13.38% of new users were prescribed selective BAM, 45.56% non-selective extended release, and 41.07% non-selective immediate release medications. In both sexes, significant predictors of BAM included region of nursing home, body mass index, cognitive performance score, frailty measures, activities of daily living, and measures of bladder continence. In women, history of fracture and fall-related injuries were significant predictors of type of BAM use, while race and indicators of balance were significant predictors of type of BAM use in men. Non-pharmacological continence management strategies were not predictive of type of BAM initiation. CONCLUSIONS: Several factors are important in predicting type of BAM initiation in both women and men, but other factors are sex-specific. Some observed factors predicting the type of BAM initiated, such as other medications use, body mass index, or provider-related factors are potentially modifiable and could be used in targeted interventions to help optimize BAM use in this population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable.

Intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA injections for refractory neurogenic detrusor overactivity incontinence: do we need urodynamic investigation for outcome assessment?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if urinary continence in patients with refractory neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO) incontinence after intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA injections is sufficient for appropriate outcome assessment or if urodynamic investigation (UDI) is needed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A consecutive series of 148 patients undergoing intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA injections for refractory NDO incontinence were prospectively evaluated. Patients underwent UDI before and at 6 weeks after onabotulinumtoxinA injections. The primary outcome was the prevalence of maximum storage detrusor pressure (Pdetmax storage) of >40 cmH2 O in continent patients at 6 weeks after treatment. The secondary outcomes were treatment effects on other clinical and video-urodynamic variables. RESULTS: At 6 weeks after intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA injections, 98 of the 148 patients (66%) with NDO incontinence were continent. Of these patients, 18 (18%, confidence interval 12-27%) had a Pdetmax storage of >40 cmH2 O. Gender, underlying neurological disorder, and high Pdetmax storage before treatment appear to increase the risk of poor urodynamic outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Urinary continence is not sufficient for outcome assessment after intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA injections, as high intravesical pressures threatening the upper urinary tract may be missed in a relevant proportion of continent patients. Therefore, we strongly recommend UDI as a routine part of the follow-up.

Traditional suburethral sling operations for urinary incontinence in women.

BACKGROUND: Stress urinary incontinence constitutes a significant health and economic burden to society. Traditional suburethral slings are one of the surgical operations used to treat women with symptoms of stress urinary incontinence. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effects of traditional suburethral slings on stress or mixed incontinence in comparison with other management options. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Incontinence Group Specialised Register (searched 3 June 2010) and the reference lists of relevant articles. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised or quasi-randomised trials that included traditional suburethral slings for the treatment of stress or mixed urinary incontinence. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: At least three reviewers independently extracted data from included trials onto a standard form and assessed trial methodological quality. The data abstracted were relevant to predetermined outcome measures. Where appropriate, we calculated a summary statistic: a relative risk for dichotomous data and a weighted mean difference for continuous data. MAIN RESULTS: We included 26 trials involving 2284 women. The quality of evidence was moderate for most trials and there was generally short follow-up ranging from 6 to 24 months.One medium-sized trial compared traditional suburethral sling operations with oxybutynin in the treatment of women with mixed urinary incontinence. Surgery appeared to be more effective than drugs in treating participant-reported incontinence (n = 75, risk ratio (RR) 0.18, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.08 to 0.43).One trial found that traditional slings were more effective than transurethral injectable treatment (RR for clinician-assessed incontinence within a year 0.21, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.21)Seven trials compared slings with open abdominal retropubic colposuspension. Participant-reported incontinence was lower with the slings after one year (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.90), but not when assessed by clinicians. Colposuspension, however, was associated with fewer peri-operative complications, shorter duration of use of indwelling catheter and less long-term voiding dysfunction. One study showed there was a 20% lower risk of bladder perforation with the sling procedure but a 50% increase in urinary tract infection with the sling procedure compared with colposuspension. Fewer women developed prolapse after slings (compared with after colposuspension) in two small trials but this did not reach statistical significance.Twelve trials addressed the comparison between traditional sling operations and minimally invasive sling operations. These seemed to be equally effective in the short term (RR for incontinence within first year 0.97, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.20) but minimally invasive slings had a shorter operating time, fewer peri-operative complications (other than bladder perforation) and some evidence of less post-operative voiding dysfunction and detrusor symptoms.Six trials compared one type of traditional sling with another. Materials included porcine dermis, lyophilised dura mater, fascia lata, vaginal wall, autologous dermis and rectus fascia. Participant-reported improvement rates within the first year favoured the traditional autologous material rectus fascia over other biological materials (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.98). There were more complications with the use of non-absorbable Gore-Tex in one trial.Data for comparison of bladder neck needle suspension with suburethral slings were inconclusive because they came from a single trial with a small specialised population.No trials compared traditional suburethral slings with anterior repair, laparoscopic retropubic colposuspension or artificial sphincters. Most trials did not distinguish between women having surgery for primary or recurrent incontinence when reporting participant characteristics.For most of the comparisons, clinically important differences could not be ruled out. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Traditional slings seem to be as effective as minimally invasive slings, but had higher rates of adverse effects. This should be interpreted with some caution however, as the quality of evidence for the studies was variable, follow-up short and populations small, particularly for identifying complication rates. Tradional sling procedures appeared to confer a similar cure rate in comparison to open retropubic colposuspension, but the long-term adverse event profile is still unclear. A brief economic commentary (BEC) identified two studies suggesting that traditional slings may be more cost-effective compared with collagen injection but not cost-effective when compared with minimally invasive sling operations. Reliable evidence to clarify whether or not traditional suburethral slings may be better or worse than other surgical or conservative management options is lacking.

Older People's Preferences for Side Effects Associated with Antimuscarinic Treatments of Overactive Bladder: A Discrete-Choice Experiment.

INTRODUCTION: Understanding the importance older people attribute to the different side effects associated with oral antimuscarinic treatments for overactive bladder (OAB) could help inform prescribers, healthcare policy makers and the drug industry. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to quantify the importance of the most prevalent cognitive and side effects of oral antimuscarinic treatments for OAB in older people. METHODS: We conducted a discrete-choice experiment (DCE) with the assistance of an interviewer with community-dwelling and hospitalized older people aged >65 years. The DCE involved two hypothetical drugs for imaginary OAB, with three levels of four side effects for each drug, and the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Overactive Bladder and EuroQol 5-Dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaire were also administered. Data were analysed using a conditional logit model. RESULTS: In total, 276 older people participated in the study. The median age was 75 years (interquartile range [IQR] 69-80), 63% were women and 21% had OAB syndrome. The most unwanted side effect in the choice of antimuscarinics for OAB was severe cognitive effects, followed by severe constipation, severe blurred vision, severe dry mouth, moderate cognitive effects and moderate constipation. Severe cognitive effects were at least 1.7 times as important as severe constipation. Exploratory subgroup analysis showed that none of the attributes was found to be significant in people who scored as anxious or depressed on the EQ-5D, and preferences about cognitive effects, constipation and blurred vision were equal in people with and without OAB. CONCLUSION: Older people attribute more importance to loss of cognitive function as a possible side effect of antimuscarinic treatment than to the three most prevalent possible side effects of this treatment.

Self-assessment of treatment compliance with antimuscarinic drugs and lower urinary tract condition among women with urinary incontinence.

AIM: Our aim was to determine the efficiency of the Medication Compliance Self-Report Inventory (MASRI) in self-reporting antimuscarinic drug treatment compliance among women with urinary incontinence (UI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study assessed 347 women aged 18-65 (averaging 49.7) years with more than one urinary incontinence (UI) episode per day. Treatment compliance was tested at the beginning and at weeks 4, 8, and 12 using the MASRI, the Brief Medication Questionnaire (BMQ), and visual pill counts. The MASRI's constructive, concurrent, and discriminate validity was studied in comparison with an external standard that uses the chi-square and Spearman coefficient. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to identify optimum MASRI cutoffs that would predict noncompliance. Furthermore, the functional condition of the lower urinary tract was tested using voiding diaries, uroflowmetry, and cystometry. RESULT: The correlation between the percentage of noncompliant women according to the MASRI, and individuals with a belief barrier with respect to the BMQ screen was r = 0.81 (p ≤0.05), r = 0.84 (p ≤0.05), and r = 0.79 (p ≤0.05). The correlation between the percentage of noncompliant women according to the MASRI and of women who missed >20% of their doses according to the Regimen Screen of the BMQ was r = 0.79, p ≤0.05, r = 0.82, p ≤0.01, r = 0.77, and p ≤0.05 at the control points. Finally, the percentage of noncompliant patients who self-reported correctly according to the MASRI data compared with the BMQ was 95.6%, 95.7%, and 96.6% at the control points. CONCLUSION: The MASRI entails acceptable validity for accurately predicting treatment compliance with antimuscarinic drugs among women who have had UI for >3 months.

Economic impact of onabotulinumtoxinA for overactive bladder with urinary incontinence in Europe.

BACKGROUND: Overactive bladder (OAB) is a common condition that has a significant impact on patients' health-related quality-of-life and is associated with a substantial economic burden to healthcare systems. OnabotulinumtoxinA has a well-established efficacy and safety profile as a treatment for OAB; however, the economic impact of using onabotulinumtoxinA has not been well described. METHODS: An economic model was developed to assess the budget impact associated with OAB treatment in France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK, using onabotulinumtoxinA alongside best supportive care (BSC)-comprising incontinence pads and/or anticholinergic use and/or clean intermittent catheterisation (CIC)-vs BSC alone. The model time horizon spanned 5 years, and included direct costs associated with treatment, BSC, and adverse events. RESULTS: Per 100,000 patients in each country, the use of onabotulinumtoxinA resulted in estimated cost savings of €97,200 (Italy), €71,580 (Spain), and €19,710 (UK), and cost increases of €23,840 in France and €284,760 in Germany, largely due to day-case and inpatient administration, respectively. Projecting these results to the population of individuals aged 18 years and above gave national budget saving estimates of €9,924,790, €27,458,290, and €48,270,760, for the UK, Spain, and Italy, respectively, compared to cost increases of €12,160,020 and €196,086,530 for France and Germany, respectively. Anticholinergic treatment and incontinence pads were the largest contributors to overall spending on OAB management when onabotulinumtoxinA use was not increased, and remained so in four of five scenarios where onabotulinumtoxinA use was increased. This decreased resource use was equivalent to cost offsets ranging from €106,110 to €176,600 per 100,000 population. CONCLUSIONS: In three of five countries investigated, the use of onabotulinumtoxinA, in addition to BSC, was shown to result in healthcare budget cost savings over 5 years. Scenario analyses showed increased costs in Germany and France were largely attributable to the treatment setting rather than onabotulinumtoxinA acquisition costs.

Mirabegron for the treatment of overactive bladder: cost-effectiveness from US commercial health-plan and Medicare Advantage perspectives.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The first class of oral pharmacologic treatments for overactive bladder (OAB) are antimuscarinics that are associated with poor persistence, anticholinergic adverse events, and increased anticholinergic burden (ACB) with risk of cognitive impairment. Mirabegron, a ß3-adrenoceptor agonist, is an oral treatment that does not contribute to ACB and has early evidence of improved persistence. The objective of the analysis was to assess the cost-effectiveness of mirabegron for OAB vs six antimuscarinics in the US. METHODS: A Markov state-transition model assessed US commercial health-plan and Medicare Advantage perspectives over a 3-year time horizon in an OAB patient population. Transition probabilities between five micturition and five incontinence severity states were derived from a network meta-analysis of 44 trials of oral OAB treatments. Therapy beginning with an oral OAB agent could discontinue or switch to another oral agent and could be followed by tibial nerve stimulation, sacral neuromodulation, or onabotulinumtoxinA. The primary outcome was cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). Utilities were mapped from incontinence and micturition frequencies as well as demographics. Based on analysis of data from a large healthcare system, elevated ACB was associated with increased healthcare utilization and probability of cognitive impairment. RESULTS: From both commercial and Medicare Advantage perspectives, mirabegron was the most clinically effective treatment, while oxybutynin was the least expensive. Tolterodine immediate release (IR) was also on the cost-effectiveness frontier. The analysis estimated costs per QALY of $59,690 and $66,347 for mirabegron from commercial health plan and Medicare Advantage perspectives, respectively, compared to tolterodine IR. Other antimuscarinics were dominated. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis estimated that mirabegron is a cost-effective treatment for OAB from US commercial health plan and Medicare Advantage perspectives, due to fewer projected adverse events and comorbidities, and data suggesting better persistence.

Prevalence of the geriatric syndromes and frailty in older men living in the community: The Concord Health and Ageing in Men Project.

AIM: To describe the age at which the geriatric syndromes and frailty become common in community-dwelling men. METHODS: The Concord Health and Ageing in Men Project involves a population-based sample of 1705 community-dwelling men aged 70 and over from a defined geographic region in Sydney. Data were obtained by physical performance tests, clinical examinations, and questionnaire to determine the prevalence of the following conditions by five-year age group. RESULTS: Poor mobility, recurrent falls, urinary incontinence, dementia and frailty phenotype were all uncommon (less than 10%) in men in their 70s, but the prevalence of each of these conditions exceeded 10% in men aged 85-89. The prevalence of Frailty Index-defined frailty, multimorbidity, polypharmacy and instrumental activities of daily living dependence was constantly high in all age groups. CONCLUSIONS: The different health-care needs of the 'old old' aged 85 years and older should be accounted for in health service planning.

Health Resource Utilization and Cost for Patients with Incontinent Overactive Bladder Treated with Anticholinergics.

BACKGROUND: Overactive bladder (OAB) is a common medical condition with significant economic and humanistic burden. Inadequately managed OAB may exacerbate or result in comorbidities such as depression, falls, and urinary tract infections, which can further increase the burden to the health care system. Anticholinergics are often prescribed for management of OAB with urinary incontinence ("wet" OAB). However, research has shown that patient adherence and persistence to anticholinergic therapy is poor, with approximately 80% of patients ultimately failing their first prescribed anticholinergic medication within the first year. While there has been a fair amount of research on the economic burden of OAB, the real-world impact of initiating anticholinergic therapy in patients with wet OAB has not been well studied. OBJECTIVE: To compare falls/fractures, anxiety/depression, health care resource utilization, and health care costs between a cohort of patients with wet OAB who initiated anticholinergic therapy and a matched cohort of patients without OAB. METHODS: This study was a retrospective medical and pharmacy claims analysis. Cases were members of a primary care-based, multispecialty physician medical group located in California. Cases were eligible for inclusion if they were prescribed anticholinergic therapy between January 2008 and May 2012 based on pharmacy claims, had a diagnosis of OAB, and reported having ≥ 1 urinary incontinence episode per day. Wet OAB cases were matched to non-OAB controls in a 1:3 ratio based on sex, age, and observation time. Medical and pharmacy claims data were used to analyze patient comorbidities, as well as track health care resource utilization (HRU) and direct payer costs. RESULTS: After initiating anticholinergic therapy, wet OAB patients had a 46% higher adjusted risk of experiencing falls/fractures (P < 0.001) and a 33% higher adjusted risk of experiencing depression/anxiety (P = 0.022) than non-OAB patients. Wet OAB was significantly associated with increased HRU rates of hospital admissions, outpatient visits, prescriptions filled, and diagnostic tests performed. After adjustment for covariates, total health care cost was 33% higher for wet OAB patients than non-OAB patients, resulting in an increased cost of $1,746 per member per year. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this research suggest OAB patients who initiate anticholinergic therapy and still experience incontinence are at a greater risk for comorbidities such as falls/fractures and depression/anxiety, and use significantly more health care resources, than patients without OAB. Programs to improve patient monitoring and referrals, the appropriate use of alternative treatments within guidelines, and adherence to evidence-based practice parameters may improve clinical outcomes and decrease HRU for these patients. DISCLOSURES: This study was sponsored by Allergan, Irvine, California, which reviewed and approved the final manuscript. At the time of the study, Yehoshua had received a fellowship at the University of Arizona, which was funded by Allergan. Yehoshua, Joshi, and Campbell are employees of Allergan. Vasaveda has received consulting fees from Allergan, Medtronic, and Boston Scientific. Chancelor has received consulting fees from Allergan and Medtronic. All authors met the ICMJE authorship criteria. Neither honoraria nor payments were made for authorship. Study design was created by Yehoshua, Pulicharam, Malone, and Armstrong. Pulicharam took the lead in data collection, along with Chancellor and Campbell, and data interpretation was performed by Chancellor, Vasavada, Malone, and Armstrong. The manuscript was written by Yehoshua and revised by Joshi and Yehoshua, with assistance from the other authors.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of onabotulinumtoxinA (BOTOX(®)) for the management of urinary incontinence in adults with neurogenic detrusor overactivity: a UK perspective.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the cost effectiveness of onabotulinumtoxinA (BOTOX(®), 200 units [200 U]) for the management of urinary incontinence (UI) in adults with neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO) due to subcervical spinal cord injury or multiple sclerosis that is not adequately managed with anticholinergic drugs (ACHDs). PERSPECTIVE: UK National Health Service (NHS) perspective. METHODS: A Markov state-transition model was developed, which compared onabotulinumtoxinA + best supportive care (BSC) with BSC alone (comprising behavioural therapy and pads, alone or in combination with clean intermittent catheterization and possibly with ACHDs). Non-responders were eligible for invasive procedures. Health states were defined according to the reduction in UI episodes. Efficacy data and estimates of resource utilization were pooled from 468 patients on onabotulinumtoxinA in two phase III clinical trials. Drug costs (2013) and administration costs (NHS Reference Costs 2011-2012) were obtained from published sources. The time horizon of the model was 5 years, and costs and benefits were discounted at 3.5%. Scenario, one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSAs) were conducted to explore uncertainties around the assumptions. RESULTS: In the base case, treatment with onabotulinumtoxinA + BSC over 5 years was associated with an increase in costs of £1,689 and an increase in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) of 0.4, compared with BSC alone, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £3,850 per QALY gained. Sensitivity analyses showed that utility values had the greatest influence on model results. PSA suggests that onabotulinumtoxinA + BSC had a 100 % probability of being cost effective at a willingness to pay of <£20,000. CONCLUSION: For adult patients with NDO who are not adequately managed with ACHDs, onabotulinumtoxinA + BSC appears to be a cost-effective use of resources in the UK NHS.

Efectividad y seguridad de la oxibutinina o tolterodina comparado con darifenacina, solifenacina, fesoterodina y placebo para el tratamiento de la incontinencia / Effectiveness and safety of oxybutynin or tolterodine compared to darifenacin, solifenacin, fesoterodine and placebo for the treatment of incontinence

Introducción: Alrededor del 16% al 45% de los adultos tiene síntomas de vejiga hiperactiva, que se manifiestan con urgencia para orinar, aumento en la frecuencia de micciones o incontinencia urinaria de urgencia, o ambos, denominado síndrome de vejiga hiperactiva. Los fármacos anticolinérgicos son los tratamientos más comunes para el tratamiento farmacológico y entre ellos la oxibutinina y la tolterodina. Esta evaluación tecnológica se desarrolló en el marco de la actualización integral del Plan Obligatorio de Salud para el año 2015. Objetivo: evaluar la efectividad y seguridad de la oxibutinina o la tolterodina para la incontinencia urinaria, comparadas con otros medicamentos antimuscarínicos como: solifenacina, darifenacina, fesoterodina para informar la toma de decisiones. Metodología: la evaluación fue realizada de acuerdo al protocolo definido previamente por el grupo desarrollador. Se realizó una búsqueda sistemática en MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects y LILACS, sin restricciones de idioma y limitada a revisiones sistemáticas publicadas en los últimos cinco años. Las búsquedas electrónicas fueron hechas entre octubre y noviembre de 2014 y se complementaron mediante búsqueda manual en bola de nieve y una consulta con expertos temáticos. La tamización de referencias se realizó por dos revisores de forma independiente y los desacuerdos fueron resueltos por consenso. La selección de estudios fue realizada mediante la revisión en texto completo de las referencias preseleccionadas, verificando los criterios de elegibilidad. La calidad de los estudios fue valorada con la herramienta AMSTAR. Las características de los estudios fueron extraídas a partir de las publicaciones originales. Se realizó una síntesis narrativa de las estimaciones del efecto para las comparaciones y desenlaces de interés a partir de los estudios de mejor calidad con AMSTAR. Resultados: se seleccionó una revisión sistemática que incluyó un total de 86 ensayos clínicos (31,249 pacientes) con medicamentos muscarínicos incluyendo a la Oxibutinina y la Tolterodina. Se realizaron comparaciones directas entre medicamentos y comparaciones intratecnología (dosis y presentaciones). Cuando se comparó la Tolterodina versus la Oxibutinina, no se encontró diferencia estadisticamente significativa en los desenlaces de calidad de vida, la percepción de cura o mejora y cuantificación de los síntomas. Cuando se comparó solifenacina versus tolterodina, se encontró diferencia estadisticamente significativa en los mismos desenlaces a favor de la solifenacina, e igual se reportó en la comparación fesoterodina versus tolterodina, a favor de la fesoterodina. Respecto a seguridad se comparó tolterodina versus oxibutinina y el retiro por eventos adversos fue más frecuente en el grupo de la oxibutinina RR 0.52 IC95% 0.40 a 0.66. En la comparación de soliferacina versus oxibutinina el retiro por eventos adversos fue más frecuente en el grupo de oxibutinina RR 0.45 IC95% 0.22 a 0.91 y al comparar la fesoterodina versus la tolterodina el retiro por eventos adversos fue más frecuente en el grupo de la fesoterodina RR 1.45 IC95% 1.07 a 1.98. Conclusiones: Efectividad: No se evidenció diferencia en efectividad entre la Oxibutinina y Tolterodina en los desenlaces de calidad de vida y la percepción de cura o mejora. Para la comparación de efectividad entre Oxibutinina versus Darifenacina y Solifenacina, no se reportaron resultados. La Solfenacina y Fesoterodina son más efectivas que la Tolterodina, en los desenlaces de calidad de vida y la percepción de cura o mejora. Seguridad: Tolterodina fue más seguro que la Oxibutinina, respecto al abandono por eventos adversos. La comparación entre Darifenacina versus oxibutinina no reportó resultados. Solifenacina fue más seguro que la oxibutinina, respecto al abandono por eventos adversos. Tolterodina fue más seguro que Fesoterodina, respecto al abandono por eventos adversos y boca seca.(AU)

Cost-effectiveness analysis of solifenacin versus oxybutynin immediate-release in the treatment of patients with overactive bladder in the United Kingdom.

OBJECTIVE: To carry out a cost-utility analysis comparing initial treatment with solifenacin 5 mg/day vs oxybutynin immediate-release (IR) 15 mg/day for the treatment of patients with overactive bladder (OAB) from the perspective of the U.K. National Health Service (NHS). METHODS: A Markov model with six health states was developed to follow a cohort of OAB patients treated with either solifenacin or oxybutynin during a 1-year period. Costs and utilities were accumulated as patients transited through the health states in the model and a drop-out state. Some of the solifenacin patients were titrated from 5 mg to 10 mg/day at 8 weeks. A proportion of drop-out patients were assumed to continue treatment with tolterodine ER. Utility values were obtained from a Swedish study and pad use was based on a multinational clinical trial. Adherence rates for individual treatments were derived from a U.K. database study. For pad use and utility values, the drop-out state was split between those patients who were no longer receiving treatment and those on second-line therapy. Patients on second-line therapy who drop-out were referred for a specialist visit. Results were expressed in terms of incremental cost-utility ratios. RESULTS: Total annual costs for solifenacin and oxybutynin were £504.30 and £364.19, respectively. First-line drug use represents 49% and 4% of costs and pad use represent 23% and 40% of costs for solifenacin and oxybutynin, respectively. Differences between cumulative utilities were small but were greater for solifenacin (0.7020 vs. 0.6907). The baseline incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was £12,309/QALY. CONCLUSION: Under the baseline assumptions, solifenacin would appear to be cost-effective with an incremental cost-utility of less than £20,000/QALY. However, small differences in utility between the alternatives and the large number of drop-outs means that the results are sensitive to small adjustments in the values of utilities assigned to the drop-out state.

[European Association of Urology guidelines on assessment and nonsurgical management of urinary incontinence]. / Guía clínica de la Asociación Europea de Urología sobre la evaluación y el tratamiento no quirúrgico de la incontinencia urinaria.

CONTEXT: The previous European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines on urinary incontinence comprised a summary of sections of the 2009 International Consultation on Incontinence. A decision was made in 2010 to rewrite these guidelines based on an independent systematic review carried out by the EAU guidelines panel, using a sustainable methodology. OBJECTIVE: We present a short version of the full guidelines on assessment, diagnosis, and nonsurgical treatment of urinary incontinence, with the aim of increasing their dissemination. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Evidence appraisal included a pragmatic review of existing systematic reviews and independent new literature searches, based on Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome questions. Appraisal of papers was carried out by an international panel of experts, who also collaborated on a series of consensus discussions, to develop concise structured evidence summaries and action-based recommendations using a modified Oxford system. EVIDENCE SUMMARY: The full version of the guidelines is available online (http://www.uroweb.org/guidelines/online-guidelines/). The guidelines include algorithms that refer the reader back to the supporting evidence, and they are more immediately useable in daily clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS: These new guidelines present an up-to-date summary of the available evidence, together with clear clinical algorithms and action-based recommendations based on the best available evidence. Where such evidence does not exist, they present a consensus of expert opinion.

Estimating the cost-effectiveness of onabotulinumtoxinA for neurogenic detrusor overactivity in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Urinary incontinence (UI) secondary to a neurogenic pathology, including spinal cord injury and multiple sclerosis, is termed neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO). Patients with NDO experience decreased quality of life and are at risk for upper urinary tract damage. Two recent trials demonstrated that onabotulinumtoxinA significantly reduced UI, improved urodynamic parameters, and improved quality of life relative to placebo. However, the economic impact of onabotulinumtoxinA treatment for UI due to NDO in the United States remains unknown. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this analysis was to evaluate whether the benefit observed in NDO patients receiving onabotulinumtoxinA provides good value for money. METHODS: We developed a Markov state transition model to estimate population outcomes and costs for anticholinergic-refractory NDO patients who received either onabotulinumtoxinA or best supportive care (use of incontinence pads with either an anticholinergic drug, clean intermittent self-catheterization, or both). Nonresponding patients (<50% reduction in UI episodes at 6 weeks) were eligible to receive invasive procedures, including augmentation cystoplasty or sacral neuromodulation. Patients could transition through 6 health states, 3 defined based on response to initial treatment, 2 capturing patients who underwent invasive procedures, and death. Time in each health state was adjusted for patient quality of life and summed to estimate quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). The model included direct medical costs related to initial and subsequent drug and invasive treatments, physician visits, and catheterization. Outcomes and costs were summed and compared across intervention groups by using the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER; cost per QALY). The time horizon of the model was 3 years, and results were discounted at 3%. Scenario, 1-way, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to test the robustness of the model results. RESULTS: In the base case, onabotulinumtoxinA increased QALYs by 0.059 and costs by $1466 compared with best supportive care, which resulted in an estimated ICER of $24,720/QALY. OnabotulinumtoxinA also decreased mean UI episodes per person-year by 398, resulting in a cost of $4 per UI episode avoided. Model results were most sensitive to the probability of treatment response. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated that at a willingness to pay of $50,000/QALY, onabotulinumtoxinA has a 97% probability of being cost-effective. In subgroup analyses of each etiology, onabotulinumtoxinA yielded an ICER of $32,268/QALY in multiple sclerosis and $2182 in spinal cord injury. CONCLUSION: OnabotulinumtoxinA seems to be a cost-effective intervention for UI due to NDO compared with best supportive care.

Pharmacotherapy for overactive bladder: minimally invasive treatment -- botulinum toxins.

INTRODUCTION: Considered by many a 'revolution' in the treatment of intractable overactive bladder (OAB) and with an increasing number of centers including it in their practice worldwide, botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT/A) injected into the bladder wall is a treatment of significant potential. In anticipation of the results of multicenter, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging studies, this is a critical review of the available literature on the use of botulinum toxins in the treatment of either neurogenic or idiopathic OAB. AREAS COVERED: The review is based on the English-language literature published by Medline on the use of botulinum toxins in neurogenic or idiopathic detrusor overactivity/OAB since the seminal publication in 2000. The reader is exposed to the cumulative data as well as to a more critical insight on the clinical efficacy of single and repeat injections of the most widely used formulations, the injection techniques, including different doses, dilutions and injection sites, the mechanism of action, the side effects and the cost-effectiveness of the treatment. EXPERT OPINION: Despite the markedly heterogeneous methodologies, published studies suggest that BoNT/A is effective when a number of outcomes are considered, and is considered safe. As results of large registration studies are awaited, additional research on the optimization of clinical practice parameters such as benefit-risk ratio, injection technique, predictors of response and long-term safety, as well as on the mechanism of action and the cost-effectiveness of the treatment, would be welcome.

Solifenacin in the treatment of overactive bladder syndrome in Italian patients: pharmacoeconomic evaluation.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the pharmacoeconomic performance of treatment with solifenacin, a new antimuscarinic with selectivity for the bladder, when compared to tolterodine and placebo, in Italian patients with overactive bladder (OAB). METHODS: The evaluation was performed using a Markov model. The time horizon of the simulation was 52 weeks, with 1-week cycles. The model simulated outcomes and costs of the treatment with solifenacin (5 mg/day), tolterodine ER (4 mg/day) and no treatment in a cohort representative of the Italian population with OAB. The analysis was conducted mainly from the perspective of the patient, since drugs for the treatment of OAB are not included in the Italian reimbursement list. A supplementary scenario explored the consequences of a hypothetical reimbursement decision by the Italian Health Service to reimburse half of the current retail price in incontinent and responding OAB patients only. RESULTS: Both treatments produced a reduction in symptoms and improvement in patients' quality of life, with an cost increase of about euro 540-640/patient/year with solifenacin and euro 680-780/patient/year with tolterodine. In a cost/utility analysis, solifenacin dominated tolterodine as it resulted in both more effective and less costly treatment; the cost/utility ratio with respect to no treatment was in the range euro 7,600-18,600/Quality-adjusted life year. The overall expenditure of the hypothesised reimbursement decision was estimated to be about 23 million euros, with a cost/utility ratio of about euro 600-2,400/Quality-adjusted life year, indicating an efficient allocation of health resources. CONCLUSIONS: While both tolterodine and solifenacin appear to be cost/effective in Italy, the latter has proven to be superior.

Survey assessment of continuation of and satisfaction with pharmacological treatment for urinary incontinence.

PURPOSE: To evaluate treatment satisfaction and compliance with pharmacologic therapy in urinary incontinence patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An online survey was returned by 1447 individuals from a nationwide panel of adults who had previously reported treatment for incontinence symptoms and agreed to participate in survey research. Data on demographics, incontinence severity, treatment compliance, and satisfaction were obtained. Logistic regression was used to estimate crude and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for characteristics associated with pharmacologic treatment dissatisfaction and discontinuation. RESULTS: The sample was predominantly female (87%) and white (93%) with a mean age of 56 years. On average, patients urinated 10 times/day and experienced 16 wetting accidents in the week preceding survey. Overall, 25% reported being somewhat or very dissatisfied with treatment. Those who reported a severe effect of incontinence on their lives were most likely to be dissatisfied (OR = 2.82, 95% CI = 1.89-4.23). Discontinuation of drug treatment was reported by 45% of study subjects, with major reasons being poor efficacy (in 41.3% of discontinuations), side effects (22.4%), and cost (18.7%). Predictors for discontinuation included young age (OR = 1.8, 95% CI = 1.2-2.8), experiencing symptoms for 10 or more years (OR = 1.5, 95% CI = 1.1-2.0), and experiencing more than 16 wetting accidents in the last week (OR = 1.6, 95% CI = 1.3-2.1). CONCLUSIONS: This online survey of self-selected incontinence patients indicated that almost half of those who have received drug treatment for incontinence had discontinued primarily because of lack of efficacy, side effects, and cost concerns. Our findings suggest a substantial degree of unmet need from current therapy among those with incontinence.