The Rise and Risks of Medicare Advantage "Affinity Plans".

This Viewpoint discusses the proliferation of Medicare Advantage plans targeting specific groups of individuals and whether these plans will improve quality of care for beneficiaries.

Sprint Team Approach Yields Rapid Improvement in Leapfrog Quality Indicators.

GOAL: Patient safety and quality care are two critical areas that every healthcare organization strives to grow and improve upon. At Scripps Health, specific efforts reviewed for this article were implemented to reduce hospital-acquired conditions and hospital readmissions that are components of Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services programs and Leapfrog Hospital Survey scores. METHODS: Sprint teams, a novel approach to rapidly develop a checklist for lower-performing care improvement areas, were implemented after an internal review of existing tools and an evidence-based literature review. These areas included catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs), central-line associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs), Clostridioides difficile (C. diff.) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and heart failure readmissions, surgical site infections and handwashing, bar coding, and the computerized physician order entry components of Leapfrog scoring. The checklist for each area served as a teaching tool for staff and a guideline for case review to ensure that standard work was routinely performed. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The sprint teams showed dramatic results in the initial focus areas. From a baseline standardized infection ratio (SIR) of 1.141 for CLABSIs, the sprint team reduced the SIR to 0.885 in Year 1 of the program and to 0.687 in Year 2. For CAUTIs, the SIR decreased from a baseline of 1.391 in Year 1 to 0.720 in Year 2. C. diff. infections fell from 0.422 to 0.315 in Year 1 and to 0.260 in Year 2. While the MRSA SIR did not improve during the first year, the MRSA reduction sprint team showed success in Year 2 with a decrease in the SIR from 0.537 to 0.245. Readmission reduction sprint teams focused on heart failure, COPD, and total hip and knee complications. The teams also achieved positive results in reducing readmissions by following checklists and reviewing each readmission case for justification. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS: Rapid change can be safely and effectively implemented with multidisciplinary sprint teams. Developed with an evidence-based, case review approach, sprint team checklists can help to standardize processes for the review of any infections or readmissions that occur in the inpatient arena.

Feasibility of quality indicators on prehospital advanced airway management in a physician-staffed emergency medical service: survey-based assessment of the provider point of view.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine the feasibility of quality indicators (QIs) for prehospital advanced airway management (PAAM) from a provider point of view. DESIGN: The study is a survey based feasibility assessment following field testing of QIs for PAAM. SETTING: The study was performed in two physician staffed emergency medical services in Switzerland. PARTICIPANTS: 42 of the 44 emergency physicians who completed at least one case report form (CRF) dedicated to the collection of the QIs on PAAM between 1 January 2019 and 31 December 2021 participated in the study. INTERVENTION: The data required to calculate the 17 QIs was systematically collected through a dedicated electronic CRF. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were provider-related feasibility criteria: relevance and acceptance of the QIs, as well as reliability of the data collection. Secondary outcomes were effort to collect specific data and to complete the CRF. RESULTS: Over the study period, 470 CRFs were completed, with a median of 11 per physician (IQR 4-17; range 1-48). The median time to complete the CRF was 7 min (IQR 3-16) and was considered reasonable by 95% of the physicians. Overall, 75% of the physicians assessed the set of QIs to be relevant, and 74% accepted that the set of QIs assessed the quality of PAAM. The reliability of data collection was rated as good or excellent for each of the 17 QIs, with the lowest rated for the following 3 QIs: duration of preoxygenation, duration of laryngoscopy and occurrence of desaturation during laryngoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: Collection of QIs on PAAM appears feasible. Electronic medical records and technological solutions facilitating automatic collection of vital parameters and timing during the procedure could improve the reliability of data collection for some QIs. Studies in other services are needed to determine the external validity of our results.

Evaluating the Quality of Virtual Urgent Care: Barriers, Motivations, and Implementation of Quality Measures.

BACKGROUND: Experts estimate virtual urgent care programs could replace approximately 20% of current emergency department visits. In the absence of widespread quality guidance to programs or quality reporting from these programs, little is known about the state of virtual urgent care quality monitoring initiatives. OBJECTIVE: We sought to characterize ongoing quality monitoring initiatives among virtual urgent care programs. APPROACH: Semi-structured interviews of virtual health and health system leaders were conducted using a pilot-tested interview guide to assess quality metrics captured related to care effectiveness and equity as well as programs' motivations for and barriers to quality measurement. We classified quality metrics according to the National Quality Forum Telehealth Measurement Framework. We developed a codebook from interview transcripts for qualitative analysis to classify motivations for and barriers to quality measurement. KEY RESULTS: We contacted 13 individuals, and ultimately interviewed eight (response rate, 61.5%), representing eight unique virtual urgent care programs at primarily academic (6/8) and urban institutions (5/8). Most programs used quality metrics related to clinical and operational effectiveness (7/8). Only one program reported measuring a metric related to equity. Limited resources were most commonly cited by participants (6/8) as a barrier to quality monitoring. CONCLUSIONS: We identified variation in quality measurement use and content by virtual urgent care programs. With the rapid growth in this approach to care delivery, more work is needed to identify optimal quality metrics. A standardized approach to quality measurement will be key to identifying variation in care and help focus quality improvement by virtual urgent care programs.

Accreditation of stroke programs at the MENA + region; between aspiration and reality.

INTRODUCTION: Despite global progress in stroke care, challenges persist, especially in Low- and Middle-Income countries (LMIC). The Middle East and North Africa Stroke and Interventional Neurotherapies Organization (MENA-SINO) Stroke Program Accreditation Initiative aims to improve stroke care regionally. MATERIAL & METHOD: A 2022 survey assessed stroke unit readiness in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) + region, revealing significant regional disparities in stroke care between high-income and low-income countries. Additionally, it demonstrated interest in the accreditation procedure and suggested that regional stroke program accreditation will improve stroke care for the involved centers. CONCLUSION: An accreditation program that is specifically tailored to the regional needs in the MENA + countries might be the solution. In this brief review, we will discuss potential challenges faced by such a program and we will put forward a well-defined 5-step accreditation process, beginning with a letter of intent, through processing the request and appointment of reviewers, the actual audit, the certification decisions, and culminating in granting a MIENA-SINO tier-specific certificate with recertification every 5 years.

The Effectiveness of the Case Manager-Centered Collaborative Care Model with Computer-Assisted Assessment on Quality Indicators for the Care of Dementia.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to investigate the influence of case management and its corresponding computer-assisted assessment system on the quality improvement of dementia care. METHODS: This observational study enrolled 2029 patients and their caregivers at Changhua Christian Hospital in Taiwan. Physicians who made the diagnosis of dementia would introduce the patient and caregiver dyad to the case manager-centered collaborative care team after obtaining agreement. The achievement rates of 11 quality indicators (QIs) comprising timely diagnostic evaluations, regular screens of cognition and neuropsychiatric symptoms, caregiver support, and proper medication prescriptions were counted. Different timeframes (≤4 months, 4 months-1 year, 1-2 years, 2-3 years, or ≥3 years) from diagnosis of dementia to collaborative care intervention were compared. RESULTS: A significantly higher attainment rate was achieved for patients with earlier entry into the collaborative team model, including QIs about timely diagnosis and regular screening, and caregiver support. The QIs regarding dementia medication prescriptions and documentation of the risk of antipsychotics remained similar regardless of the time of entry into the model. The completion rates of QIs also improved after the information system was launched. CONCLUSIONS: Physician-case manager co-management in the setting of a collaborative care model with a computer-assisted assessment system helps improve QI achievement for dementia care.

Assessing the excess costs of the in-hospital adverse events covered by the AHRQ's Patient Safety Indicators in Switzerland.

There currently exists no comprehensive and up-to date overview on the financial impact of the different adverse events covered by the Patient Safety Indicators (PSIs) from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. We conducted a retrospective case-control study using propensity score matching on a national administrative data set of 1 million inpatients in Switzerland to compare excess costs associated with 16 different adverse events both individually and on a nationally aggregated level. After matching 8,986 cases with adverse events across the investigated PSIs to 26,931 controls, we used regression analyses to determine the excess costs associated with the adverse events and to control for other cost-related influences. The average excess costs associated with the PSI-related adverse events ranged from CHF 1,211 (PSI 18, obstetric trauma with instrument) to CHF 137,967 (PSI 10, postoperative acute kidney injuries) with an average of CHF 27,409 across all PSIs. In addition, adverse events were associated with 7.8-day longer stays, 2.5 times more early readmissions (within 18 days), and 4.1 times higher mortality rates on average. At a national level, the PSIs were associated with CHF 347 million higher inpatient costs in 2019, which corresponds to about 2.2% of the annual inpatient costs in Switzerland. By comparing the excess costs of different PSIs on a nationally aggregated level, we offer a financial perspective on the implications of in-hospital adverse events and provide recommendations for policymakers regarding specific investments in patient safety to reduce costs and suffering.

Developing an initial set of quality indicators for chiropractic care: a scoping review.

BACKGROUND: Quality indicators are standardized, evidence-based measures of health care quality. Currently, there is no basic set of quality indicators for chiropractic care published in peer-reviewed literature. The goal of this research is to develop a preliminary set of quality indicators, measurable with administrative data. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review searching PubMed/MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Index to Chiropractic Literature databases. Eligible articles were published after 2011, in English, developing/reporting best practices and clinical guidelines specifically developed for, or directly applicable to, chiropractic care. Eligible non-peer-reviewed sources such as quality measures published by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and the Royal College of Chiropractors quality standards were also included. Following a stepwise eligibility determination process, data abstraction identified specific statements from included sources that can conceivably be measured with administrative data. Once identified, statements were transformed into potential indicators by: 1) Generating a brief title and description; 2) Documenting a source; 3) Developing a metric; and 4) Assigning a Donabedian category (structure, process, outcome). Draft indicators then traversed a 5-step assessment: 1) Describes a narrowly defined structure, process, or outcome; 2) Quantitative data can conceivably be available; 3) Performance is achievable; 4) Metric is relevant; 5) Data are obtainable within reasonable time limits. Indicators meeting all criteria were included in the final set. RESULTS: Literature searching revealed 2562 articles. After removing duplicates and conducting eligibility determination, 18 remained. Most were clinical guidelines (n = 10) and best practice recommendations (n = 6), with 1 consensus and 1 clinical standards development study. Data abstraction and transformation produced 204 draft quality indicators. Of those, 57 did not meet 1 or more assessment criteria. After removing duplicates, 70 distinct indicators remained. Most indicators matched the Donabedian category of process (n = 35), with 31 structure and 4 outcome indicators. No sources were identified to support indicator development from patient perspectives. CONCLUSIONS: This article proposes a preliminary set of 70 quality indicators for chiropractic care, theoretically measurable with administrative data and largely obtained from electronic health records. Future research should assess feasibility, achieve stakeholder consensus, develop additional indicators including those considering patient perspectives, and study relationships with clinical outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Open Science Framework, https://osf.io/t7kgm.

Analysis of surgical quality indicators after certification as a Hernia Center.

Certifications are an increasingly used tool of quality management in the health care system. The primary goal is to improve the quality of treatment due to implemented measures based on a defined catalog of criteria and standardization of the treatment processes. However, the extent to which this affects medical and health-economic indicators is unknown. Therefore, the study aims to examine the possible effects of the certification as a Reference Center for Hernia Surgery on the treatment quality and reimbursement dimensions. The observation and recording periods were defined as 3 years before (2013-2015) and 3 years after certification as a "Reference Center for Hernia Surgery" (2016-2018). Possible changes due to the certification were examined based on multidimensional data collection and analysis. In addition, the aspects of structure, process and result quality, and the reimbursement situation were reported. One thousand three hundred and nineteen cases before and one thousand four hundred and three cases after certification were included. After the certification, the patients were older (58.1 ± 16.1 vs. 64.0 ± 16.1 years, p < 0.01), had a higher CMI (1.01 vs. 1.06), and a higher ASA score (< III 86.9 vs. 85.5%, p < 0.01). The interventions became more complex (e.g., recurrent incisional hernias 0.5% vs. 1.9%, p < 0.01). The mean length of hospital stay was significantly reduced for incisional hernias (8.8 ± 5.8 vs. 6.7 ± 4.1 days, p < 0.001). The reoperation rate for incisional hernias also decreased significantly from 8.24 to 3.66% (p = 0.04). The postoperative complication rate for inguinal hernias was significantly reduced (3.1 vs. 1.1%, p = 0.002). The reimbursement of the hernia center increased by 27.6%. There were positive changes in process and outcome quality and reimbursement after the certification, which supports the effectivity of certifications in hernia surgery.

High-volume facilities are not always low risk: comparing risk-standardized mortality rates versus facility volume as quality measures in surgical neuro-oncology.

OBJECTIVE: Risk-standardized mortality rates (RSMRs) have recently been shown to outperform facility case volume as a proxy for surgical quality in lung and gastrointestinal cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate RSMR as a surgical quality metric in primary CNS cancer. METHODS: This retrospective observational cohort study used data from the National Cancer Database, a population-based oncology outcomes database sourced from more than 1500 institutions in the United States, and included adult patients 18 years of age and older who were diagnosed with glioblastoma, pituitary adenoma, or meningioma and were treated with surgery. For each group, RSMR quintiles and annual volume were calculated in a training set (2009-2013) and these thresholds were applied to the validation set (2014-2018). In this paper, the authors compared the effectiveness and efficiency of facility volume-based versus RSMR-based hospital centralization models and evaluated the overlap between the two systems. A patterns-of-care analysis was also performed to explore socioeconomic predictors of being treated at better-performing treating facilities. RESULTS: A total of 37,838 meningioma, 21,189 pituitary adenoma, and 30,788 glioblastoma patients were surgically treated from 2014 to 2018. There were substantial differences between RSMR and facility volume classification schemes among all tumor types. In an RSMR-based centralization model, an average of 36 patients undergoing glioblastoma surgery would need to relocate to a low-mortality hospital to prevent one 30-day mortality following surgery, whereas 46 would need to relocate to a high-volume hospital. For pituitary adenoma and meningioma, both metrics were inefficient in centralizing care to reduce surgical mortality. Additionally, overall survival for glioblastoma patients was better modeled in an RSMR classification scheme. Analyses to investigate the impact of care disparities found that Black and Hispanic patients, patients earning less than $38,000, and uninsured patients were more likely to be treated at high-mortality hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: RSMR is more effective and efficient than a traditional volume-based approach for preventing early postoperative death in glioblastoma surgery. These data have important implications for future quality-related studies in neurosurgical oncology and may be relevant for healthcare/insurance payments, hospital evaluation assessments, healthcare disparities, and the standardization of care across hospitals.

Nationwide Evaluation of Quality of Care Indicators for Individuals with Severe Mental Illness and Diabetes Mellitus, Following Israel's Mental Health Reform.

Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is more common among individuals with severe mental illness (SMI). We aimed to assess quality-of-care-indicators in individuals with SMI following the 2015 Israel's Mental-Health-reform. We analyzed yearly changes in 2015-2019 of quality-of-care-measures and intermediate-DM-outcomes, with adjustment for gender, age-group, and socioeconomic status (SES) and compared individuals with SMI to the general adult population. Adults with SMI had higher prevalences of DM (odds ratio (OR) = 1.64; 95% confidence intervals (CI): 1.61-1.67) and obesity (OR = 2.11; 95% CI: 2.08-2.13), compared to the general population. DM prevalence, DM control, and obesity rates increased over the years in this population. In 2019, HbA1c testing was marginally lower (OR = 0.88; 95% CI: 0.83-0.94) and uncontrolled DM (HbA1c > 9%) slightly more common among patients with SMI (OR = 1.22; 95% CI: 1.14-1.30), control worsened by decreasing SES. After adjustment, uncontrolled DM (adj. OR = 1.02; 95% CI: 0.96-1.09) was not associated with SMI. Cardio-metabolic morbidity among patients with SMI may be related to high prevalences of obesity and DM rather than poor DM control. Effective screening for metabolic diseases in this population and social reforms are required.

Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Ownership Type Yields Mixed Performances on Quality Measures.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) ownership type on IRF-Quality Reporting Program (IRF-QRP) measures. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, observational design. SETTING: We used 2 Centers for Medicare and Medicare publicly-available, facility-level data sources: (1) IRF compare files and (2) IRF rate setting files - final rule. Data from 2021 were included. PARTICIPANTS: The study sample included 1092 IRFs (N=1092). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We estimated the effects of IRF ownership type, defined as for-profit and nonprofit, on 15 IRF-QRP measures using general linear models. Models were adjusted for the following facility-level characteristics: (1) Centers for Medicare and Medicaid census divisions; (2) number of discharges; (3) teaching status; (4) freestanding vs hospital unit; and (5) estimated average weight per discharge. RESULTS: Ownership type was significantly associated with 9 out of the fifteen IRF-QRP measures. Nonprofit IRFs performed better with having lower readmissions rates within stay and 30-day post discharge. For-profit IRFs performed better for all the functional measures and with higher rates of returning to home and the community. Lastly, for-profit IRFs spent more per Medicare beneficiary. CONCLUSIONS: Ideally, IRF performance would not vary based on ownership type. However, we found that ownership type is associated with IRF-QRP performance scores. We suggest that future studies investigate how ownership type affects patient-level outcomes and the longitudinal effect of ownership type on IRF-QRP measures.

European quality indicators developed by the European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer: a first nationwide assessment for the Dutch setting.

PURPOSE: This observational study aims to assess the feasibility of calculating indicators developed by the European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer (ECIBC) for the Dutch breast cancer population. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with invasive or in situ breast cancer between 2012 and 2018 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR). Outcomes of the quality indicators (QI) were presented as mean scores and were compared to a stated norm. Variation between hospitals was assessed by standard deviations and funnel plots and trends over time were evaluated. The quality indicator calculator (QIC) was validated by comparing these outcomes with the outcomes of constructed algorithms in Stata. RESULTS: In total, 133,527 patients were included. Data for 24 out of 26 QIs were available in the NCR. For 67% and 67% of the QIs, a mean score above the norm and low or medium hospital variation was observed, respectively. The proportion of patients undergoing a breast reconstruction or neoadjuvant systemic therapy increased over time. The proportion treated within 4 weeks from diagnosis, having >10 lymph nodes removed or estrogen negative breast cancer who underwent adjuvant chemotherapy decreased. The outcomes of the constructed algorithms in this study and the QIC showed 100% similarity. CONCLUSION: Data from the NCR could be used for the calculation of more than 92% of the ECIBC indicators. The quality of breast cancer care in the Netherlands is high, as more than half of the QIs already score above the norm and medium hospital variation was observed. The QIC can be easy and reliably applied.

A Retrospective Study: Multimodal Analgesia Quality Measure Implementation and Patient Outcome Assessment.

Current research has demonstrated that nonopioid multimodal analgesia decreases perioperative opioid consumption, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and pain scores. However, no research has been conducted to examine the patient outcomes of Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 477. This study evaluates those outcomes following implementation of MIPS 477. The medical records of 400 adult patients who underwent elective and urgent laparoscopic gynecological procedures at a facility in the Mid-Atlantic region were reviewed. Data collection included patient characteristics, analgesics administered, pain scores at postanesthesia care unit (PACU) arrival and discharge, and antiemetic administration in PACU. This study's primary outcomes were postoperative pain scores, total intraoperative and postoperative opioid consumption, and PONV. Twenty-nine patients (7.8%) met the criteria as a control group, and 341 patients (92.2%) met the criteria as a treatment group. Pain scores were higher upon PACU arrival among the control group (P = .001). The total intraoperative morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) administered was less among the treatment group (P = .04). The treatment group had reduced total intraoperative MMEs and pain scores at PACU arrival. However, there was no statistical significance in PACU discharge pain score, total PACU MMEs, and PONV in both groups.

Cost Savings Associated With Implementing 4 Total Joint Replacement Electronic Clinical Quality Measures Nationally: 2020-2040.

BACKGROUND: Digital transformation using widely available electronic data is a key component to improving health outcomes and customer choice and decreasing cost and measurement burden. Despite these benefits, existing information on the potential cost savings from electronic clinical quality measures (eCQMs) is limited. METHODS: We assessed the costs of implementing 4 eCQMs related to total hip and/or total knee arthroplasty into electronic health record systems across healthcare systems in the United States. We used published literature and technical expert panel consultation to calculate low-, mid-, and high-range hip and knee arthroplasty surgery projections, and used empirical testing, literature, and technical expert panel consultation to develop an economic model to assess projected cost savings of eCQMs when implemented nationally. RESULTS: Low-, mid-, and high-range projected cost savings for year's 2020, 2030, and 2040 were calculated for 4 orthopedic eCQMs. Mid-range projected cost savings for 2020 ranged from $7.9 to $31.9 million per measure per year. A breakeven of between 0.5% and 5.1% of adverse events (measure dependent) must be averted for cost savings to outweigh implementation costs. CONCLUSIONS: All measures demonstrated potential cost savings. These findings suggest that eCQMs have the potential to lower healthcare costs and improve patient outcomes without adding to physician documentation burden. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' investment in eCQMs is an opportunity to reduce adverse outcomes and excess costs in orthopedics.

Quality indicators for systemic anticancer therapy services: a systematic review of metrics used to compare quality across healthcare facilities.

PURPOSE: The number of systemic anticancer therapy (SACT) regimens has expanded rapidly over the last decade. There is a need to ensure quality of SACT delivery across cancer services and systems in different resource settings to reduce morbidity, mortality, and detrimental economic impact at individual and systems level. Existing literature on SACT focuses on treatment efficacy with few studies on quality or how SACT is delivered within routine care in comparison to radiation and surgical oncology. METHODS: Systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. EMBASE and MEDLINE were searched and handsearching was undertaken to identify literature on existing quality indicators (QIs) that detect meaningful variations in the quality of SACT delivery across different healthcare facilities, regions, or countries. Data extraction was undertaken by two independent reviewers. RESULTS: This review identified 63 distinct QIs from 15 papers. The majority were process QIs (n = 55, 87.3%) relating to appropriateness of treatment and guideline adherence (n = 28, 44.4%). There were few outcome QIs (n = 7, 11.1%) and only one structural QI (n = 1, 1.6%). Included studies solely focused on breast, colorectal, lung, and skin cancer. All but one studies were conducted in high-income countries. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this review highlight a significant lack of research on SACT QIs particularly those appropriate for resource-constrained settings in low- and middle-income countries. This review should form the basis for future work in transforming performance measurement of SACT provision, through context-specific QI SACT development, validation, and implementation.

Quality assessment in initial paediatric trauma care: Systematic review from prehospital care to the paediatric intensive care unit.

BACKGROUND: Trauma is the most common cause of death and disability in the paediatric population. There are a huge number of variables involved in the care they receive from health care professionals. AIM: The aim of this study was to review the available evidence of initial paediatric trauma care throughout the health care process with a view to create quality indicators (QIs). STUDY DESIGN: A systematic review was performed from Cochrane Library, Medline, Scopus and SciELO between 2010 and 2020. Studies and guidelines that examined quality or suggested QI were included. Indicators were classified by health care setting, Donabedian's model, risk of bias and the quality of the publication with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) assessment. RESULTS: The initial search included 686 articles, which were reduced to 22, with 15 primary and 7 secondary research articles. The snowball sampling technique was used to add a further seven guidelines and two articles. From these, 534 possible indicators were extracted, summarizing them into 39 and grouping the prehospital care indicators as structure (N = 5), process (N = 12) and outcome (N = 3) indicators and the hospital care indicators as structure (N = 4), process (N = 10) and outcome (N = 6) indicators. Most of the QIs have been extracted from US studies. They are multidisciplinary and in some cases are based on an adaptation of the QIs of adult trauma care. CONCLUSIONS: There was a clear gap and large variability between the indicators, as well as low-quality evidence. Future studies will validate indicators using the Delphi method. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Design a QI framework that may be used by the health system throughout the process. Indicators framework will get nurses, to assess the quality of health care, detect deficient areas and implement improvement measures.

Stepwise development of a quality assessment instrument for the medicines' pathway in nursing homes.

BACKGROUND: Quality of care in nursing homes (NHs), and especially the quality of the medicines' pathway, remains a concern. OBJECTIVES: To develop a quality assessment instrument to support NHs to evaluate the quality of their medicines' pathway, and to formulate recommendations for its implementation. METHODS: A stepwise approach was used. First, a performance questionnaire for coordinating physicians, pharmacists and head nurses was developed, alongside a set of quality indicators (QIs). Next, a feasibility study regarding the QIs was performed in 4 NHs, followed by two pilot studies to optimize the instrument (in 14 and 9 NHs, respectively). Focus groups were held to formulate recommendations for instrument implementation. RESULTS: The QI feasibility and first pilot study showed that the clarity and feasibility of QIs was insufficient. All QIs were therefore integrated in the performance questionnaire. The first pilot study also showed low response rates for certain questions in the performance questionnaire and resulted in a revision of questions with the aim to target the right type of healthcare professional, including quality coordinators and general practitioners. The final instrument targets all involved healthcare professionals (i.e. coordinating physicians, pharmacists, head nurses, general practitioners, and quality coordinators), and applies a sequential approach: a quick scan to set priorities, followed by a detailed scan to detect specific working points. The second pilot study showed appreciation for this approach. Last, five recommendations were made to promote the instrument's implementation. CONCLUSIONS: A series of feasibility and pilot studies allowed the stepwise optimization of a quality assessment instrument for the medicines' pathway in NHs and resulted in modifications to improve its clarity and feasibility. Participants' recommendations will promote the successful implementation of the quality assessment instrument.