Assessment of three antibiotic combination regimens against Gram-negative bacteria causing neonatal sepsis in low- and middle-income countries.

Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) are a major cause of neonatal sepsis in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Although the World Health Organization (WHO) reports that over 80% of these sepsis deaths could be prevented through improved treatment, the efficacy of the currently recommended first- and second-line treatment regimens for this condition is increasingly affected by high rates of drug resistance. Here we assess three well known antibiotics, fosfomycin, flomoxef and amikacin, in combination as potential antibiotic treatment regimens by investigating the drug resistance and genetic profiles of commonly isolated GNB causing neonatal sepsis in LMICs. The five most prevalent bacterial isolates in the NeoOBS study (NCT03721302) are Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, E. coli, Serratia marcescens and Enterobacter cloacae complex. Among these isolates, high levels of ESBL and carbapenemase encoding genes are detected along with resistance to ampicillin, gentamicin and cefotaxime, the current WHO recommended empiric regimens. The three new combinations show excellent in vitro activity against ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae and E. coli isolates. Our data should further inform and support the clinical evaluation of these three antibiotic combinations for the treatment of neonatal sepsis in areas with high rates of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria.

Colistin versus polymyxin B: A pragmatic assessment of renal and neurological adverse effects and effectiveness in multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections.

OBJECTIVES: Our study aimed to evaluate the real-world data on renal and neurological adverse effects and effectiveness of colistimethate sodium (CMS) and polymyxin B (PMB). MATERIALS AND METHODS: An observational prospective study was performed on inpatients receiving CMS and PMB for multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections. CMS dose was titrated to renal function, and serum creatinine was assessed daily. The incidence of nephrotoxicity, the primary outcome, was evaluated based on an increase in serum creatinine from baseline as well as by the Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss of kidney function, and End-stage renal disease criteria. Neurological adverse effects were assessed based on clinical signs and symptoms, and the causality and severity were assessed by the Naranjo scale and modified Hartwig-Siegel scale, respectively. The effectiveness of polymyxin therapy was ascertained by a composite of microbiological eradication of causative bacteria and achievement of clinical cure. Thirty-day all-cause mortality was also determined. RESULTS: Between CMS and PMB, the incidence of nephrotoxicity (59.3% vs. 55.6%, P = 0.653) or neurotoxicity (8.3% vs. 5.6%, P = 0.525) did not significantly differ. However, reversal of nephrotoxicity was significantly more with patients receiving CMS than PMB (48.4% vs. 23.3%, P = 0.021). Favorable clinical outcomes (67.6% vs. 37%, P < 0.001) and microbiological eradication of causative bacteria (73.1% vs. 46.3%, P = 0.001) were significantly more with CMS than PMB. Patients treated with CMS had lower all-cause mortality than those with PMB treatment (19.4% vs. 42.6%, P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: There is no significant difference in the incidence of renal and neurotoxic adverse effects between CMS and PMB when CMS is administered following renal dose modification. CMS shows better effectiveness and lower mortality compared to PMB.

Capturing Value Attributes in the Economic Evaluation of Ceftazidime with Avibactam for Treating Severe Aerobic Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections in the United Kingdom.

INTRODUCTION: Antimicrobial resistance remains a serious and growing threat to public health, both globally and in the UK, leading to diminishing effectiveness of antimicrobials. Despite a clear need for new antimicrobials, the clinical pipeline is insufficient, driven by high research and development costs and limited expected returns on investment. To counteract this, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and National Health Service (NHS) England have launched a reimbursement mechanism, de-linked from volume of sales, that aims to reduce economic risk by recognising the broader population-level value of antimicrobials. The objective of this study was to quantify the value of ceftazidime-avibactam for treating gram-negative infections in the UK considering some of these broader value elements unique to antimicrobials. METHODS: A previously developed dynamic disease transmission and cost-effectiveness model was applied to assess the value of introducing ceftazidime-avibactam to UK treatment practice in the management of gram-negative hospital-acquired infections in line with the licenced indications for ceftazidime-avibactam. Model inputs were parameterised using sources aligned to the UK perspective. RESULTS: The introduction of ceftazidime-avibactam into a two-line treatment sequence saved over 2300 lives, leading to a gain of 27,600 life years and 22,000 quality-adjusted life years (QALY) at an additional cost of £17 million, over a ten-year transmission period. Ceftazidime-avibactam was associated with a net monetary benefit of £642 million at willingness to pay threshold of £30,000 per QALY; even at a lower threshold of £20,000 per QALY, the net monetary benefit is £422 million. DISCUSSION: Increasing the diversity of antimicrobial treatments through the introduction of an additional antimicrobial, in this instance ceftazidime-avibactam, was associated with substantial clinical and economic benefits, when considering broader population-level value. Despite revealing considerable benefits, the value of ceftazidime-avibactam is only partially reflected in this analysis. Further efforts are required to fully operationalise the spectrum, transmission, enablement, diversity and insurance (STEDI) value framework and accurately reflect the population-level value of antimicrobials.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of polymyxin B and proposed dosing regimens in elderly patients with multi-drug-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections.

There are limited data on the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of polymyxin B in the elderly population. The objective of this study was to develop a population PK model of polymyxin B in elderly patients, determine factors that affect its PK parameters, and propose alternative dosing regimens. Critically ill elderly patients (age ≥65 years) who received intravenous polymyxin B for multi-drug-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections were enrolled. A population PK model was developed using Phoenix NLME software. Monte Carlo simulations were performed to optimize regimens attaining the PK/PD target of AUC24h/MIC >50 and target exposure of 50-100 mg‧h/L. Clinical efficacy and nephrotoxicity of polymyxin B treatment were also assessed. A total of 142 polymyxin B concentrations from 23 patients were available. A two-compartment model with first-order elimination was developed, and albumin was the significant covariate of PK parameters. However, albumin had only a slight effect on polymyxin B exposure. Simulation results indicated that two fixed regimens of 50 mg and 75 mg would be sufficient to reach the PK/PD targets when the minimum inhibitory concentrations was ≤0.5 mg/L. With the exception of 1.25 mg/kg for 58 kg, other weight-based regimens (1.25-1.5 mg/kg for 70 kg and 80 kg; twice daily) may result in at least 40% of predicted AUCss,24h >100 mg‧h/L. In conclusion, fixed maintenance dosing of 50 mg and 75 mg for polymyxin B may maximize efficacy while balancing nephrotoxicity concerns for elderly patients.

Neonatal multidrug-resistant gram-negative infection: epidemiology, mechanisms of resistance, and management.

Infants admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit, particularly those born preterm, are at high risk for infection due to the combination of an immature immune system, prolonged hospitalization, and frequent use of invasive devices. Emerging evidence suggests that multidrug-resistant gram-negative (MDR-GN) infections are increasing in neonatal settings, which directly threatens recent and ongoing advances in contemporary neonatal care. A rising prevalence of antibiotic resistance among common neonatal pathogens compounds the challenge of optimal management of suspected and confirmed neonatal infection. We review the epidemiology of MDR-GN infections in neonates in the United States and internationally, with a focus on extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacterales and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE). We include published single-center studies, neonatal collaborative reports, and national surveillance data. Risk factors for and mechanisms of resistance are discussed. In addition, we discuss current recommendations for empiric antibiotic therapy for suspected infections, as well as definitive treatment options for key MDR organisms. Finally, we review best practices for prevention and identify current knowledge gaps and areas for future research. IMPACT: Surveillance and prevention of MDR-GN infections is a pediatric research priority. A rising prevalence of MDR-GN neonatal infections, specifically ESBL-producing Enterobacterales and CRE, compounds the challenge of optimal management of suspected and confirmed neonatal infection. Future studies are needed to understand the impacts of MDR-GN infection on neonatal morbidity and mortality, and studies of current and novel antibiotic therapies should include a focus on the pharmacokinetics of such agents among neonates.

Assessment the efficacy of some various treatment methods, in vitro and in vivo, against Aeromonas hydrophila infection in fish with regard to side effects and residues.

Aeromonas hydrophila is an opportunistic bacteria with an overwhelming impact on fish farming industry especially with upraising of drug resistant mutants. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the therapeutic and side effects of levofloxacin (LEV), chitosan-nanoparticles (CNPs), and fructooligosaccharides (FOS) in control of this infection in tilapia. A total of 160 Nile-tilapia divided into 8-groups; G1: negative-control, G2: infected-control, G3: non-infected-(levofloxacin (LEV) 10 mg/kg bwt), G4: non-infected-(chitosan-nanoparticles (CNPs) 1 g/kg ration), G5: non-infected-(fructooligosaccharides (FOS) 20 g/kg ration), G6: infected-LEV, G7: infected-CNPs and G8: infected-FOS for 7 days. MICs were (0.125 µg/ml and 1.25 mg/ml) for LEV and CNPs respectively. No mortalities or significant adverse effects were recorded in non-infected treated-groups while infected were (20%) LEV, (30%) CNPs, (40%) FOS and (70%) G2. Aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) decreased by LEV and CNPs than FOS while all increased total protein (TP) and albumin than G2. Malondialdehyde (MDA) significantly decreased and superoxide dismutase (SOD) and reduced glutathione (GSH) increased in all infected-treated groups than G2 in various degrees. Urea and creatinine descending order were FOS, LEV then CNPs decreased significantly than G2. LEV musculature residues, using HPLC, decreased gradually till the 5th day; 621.00 ± 0.66, 270.00 ± 0.48 then 64.00 ± 0.40, and 471.00 ± 0.79, 175.00 ± 0.52 ppb then not detected at 1st, 3rd, and 5th days of withdrawal in non-infected and infected groups respectively. Finally, LEV and CNPs were superior as bactericidal, decreasing mortalities and enzyme activities while CNPs and FOS increased performance, non-specific immunity, and antioxidant biomarkers.

Burden of carbapenem non-susceptible infections in high-risk patients: systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Owing to their resistance to an important class of antibiotics, the prevention and treatment of carbapenem-resistant (CR)/non-susceptible Gram-negative (GN) infections has become an important public health objective. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of published literature to evaluate the burden of CR GN infections, focusing on high-risk patients such as transplant recipients, or patients with cancer, renal impairment, or sepsis. METHODS: MEDLINE®, Cochrane Central, and Embase® were searched between 2010 and March 2019. Abstracts and full-text articles were screened in duplicate. Random effects meta-analysis was conducted when reported outcomes were sufficiently similar. RESULTS: Twenty-six publications were eligible. Meta-analyses found increased mortality associated with CR infections among high-risk patients in both unadjusted analysis (8 studies; summary unadjusted odds ratio [OR]: 5.85; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.69, 9.26; I2 = 19.8%) and adjusted analysis (5 studies; summary hazard ratio [HR]: 4.67; 95% CI: 2.18, 9.99; I2 = 77.7%), compared to patients with carbapenem-susceptible (CS) infections or no infection. Increased mortality was also seen in subgroup analyses by length of follow-up (either short-term or long-term) or causative pathogen. A limited number of studies found that CR GN infections increased the risk for mechanical ventilation, adverse events such as graft failure or acute rejection in solid organ transplant recipients, increased renal failure or nephrotoxicity, and an increase in readmissions and costs, though the findings reported in the literature were not consistent. CONCLUSION: This systematic literature review and meta-analysis indicates that CR GN infections in high-risk patients are associated with increased mortality, emphasizing the need for antimicrobial stewardship and infection control in hospitals which treat high-risk patients and for the development of effective antimicrobials with favorable efficacy and safety profiles for the treatment of CR GN infections.

Needs assessment for novel Gram-negative antibiotics in US hospitals: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Evidence-based needs assessments for novel antibiotics against highly-resistant Gram-negative infections (GNIs) are scarce. We aimed to use real-world data from an electronic health record repository to identify treatment opportunities in US hospitals for GNIs resistant to all first-line drugs. METHODS: For this retrospective cohort study, population estimates with an unmet need for novel Gram-negative antibiotics were quantified using the Cerner Health Facts database (2009-15), aggregating episodes of infection in US hospitals with pathogens displaying difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR; resistance to carbapenems, other ß-lactams, and fluoroquinolones) and episodes involving empirical coverage with reserve drugs (colistin or polymyxin B and aminoglycosides). Episodes displaying extended-spectrum cephalosporin resistance (ECR) were also estimated. Episodes were multiplied by site-specific and fixed 14-day treatment durations for conservative and liberal days-of-therapy (DOT) estimates and stratified by site and taxon. Hospital type-specific DOT rates were reliability adjusted to account for random variation; cluster analyses quantified contribution from outbreaks. FINDINGS: Across 2 996 271 inpatient encounters and 134 hospitals, there were 1352 DTR-GNI episodes, 1765 episodes involving empirical therapy with colistin or polymyxin B, and 16 632 episodes involving aminoglycosides. Collectively, these yielded 39·0 (conservative estimate) to 138·2 (liberal estimate) DOT per 10 000 encounters for a novel DTR-GNI-targeted drug, whereas greater treatment opportunities were identified for ECR (six times greater) and ß-lactam susceptible GNIs (70 times greater). The most common DTR-GNI site and pathogen was lower respiratory (14·3 [43·3%] of 33 DOT per 10 000 encounters) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (522 [38·1%] of 1371 episodes), whereas Enterobacteriaceae urinary-tract infections dominated the ECR or carbapenem-sparing niche (59·0% [5589 of 9535 episodes]) equating to 210·7 DOT per 10 000 encounters. DTR Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Burkholderia spp, and Achromobacter spp represented less than 1 DOT per 10 000 encounters each. The estimated need for DTR-GNI-targeted antibiotics saw minor contributions by outbreaks and varied from 0·5 to 73·1 DOT per 10 000 encounters by hospital type. INTERPRETATION: Suspected or documented GNIs with no or suboptimal treatment options are relatively infrequent. Non-revenue-based strategies and innovative trial designs are probably essential to the development of antibiotics with improved effectiveness for these GNIs. FUNDING: Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration; Intramural Research Program, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and the National Cancer Institute.

Attributable burden in patients with carbapenem-nonsusceptible gram-negative respiratory infections.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to describe the clinical and economic burden attributable to carbapenem-nonsusceptible (C-NS) respiratory infections. METHODS: This retrospective matched cohort study assessed clinical and economic outcomes of adult patients (aged ≥18 years) who were admitted to one of 78 acute care hospitals in the United States with nonduplicate C-NS and carbapenem-susceptible (C-S) isolates from a respiratory source. A subset analysis of patients with principal diagnosis codes denoting bacterial pneumonia or other diagnoses was also conducted. Isolates were classified as community- or hospital-onset based on collection time. A generalized linear mixed model method was used to estimate the attributable burden for mortality, 30-day readmission, length of stay (LOS), cost, and net gain/loss (payment minus cost) using propensity score-matched C-NS versus C-S cohorts. RESULTS: For C-NS cases, mortality (25.7%), LOS (29.4 days), and costs ($81,574) were highest in the other principal diagnosis, hospital-onset subgroup; readmissions (19.4%) and net loss (-$9522) were greatest in the bacterial pneumonia, hospital-onset subgroup. Mortality and readmissions were not significantly higher for C-NS cases in any propensity score-matched subgroup. Significant C-NS-attributable burden was found for both other principal diagnosis subgroups for LOS (hospital-onset: 3.7 days, P = 0.006; community-onset: 1.5 days, P<0.001) and cost (hospital-onset: $12,777, P<0.01; community-onset: $2681, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Increased LOS and cost burden were observed in propensity score-matched patients with C-NS compared with C-S respiratory infections; the C-NS-attributable burden was significant only for patients with other principal diagnoses.

A Decision Tree Using Patient Characteristics to Predict Resistance to Commonly Used Broad-Spectrum Antibiotics in Children With Gram-Negative Bloodstream Infections.

BACKGROUND: As rates of multidrug-resistant gram-negative infections rise, it is critical to recognize children at high risk of bloodstream infections with organisms resistant to commonly used empiric broad-spectrum antibiotics. The objective of the current study was to develop a user-friendly clinical decision aid to predict the risk of resistance to commonly prescribed broad-spectrum empiric antibiotics for children with gram-negative bloodstream infections. METHODS: This was a longitudinal retrospective cohort study of children with gram-negative bacteria cared for at a tertiary care pediatric hospital from June 2009 to June 2015. The primary outcome was a bloodstream infection due to bacteria resistant to broad-spectrum antibiotics (ie, cefepime, piperacillin-tazobactam, meropenem, or imipenem-cilastatin). Recursive partitioning was used to develop the decision tree. RESULTS: Of 689 episodes of gram-negative bloodstream infections included, 31% were resistant to broad-spectrum antibiotics. The decision tree stratified patients into high- or low-risk groups based on prior carbapenem treatment, a previous culture with a broad-spectrum antibiotic resistant gram-negative organism in the preceding 6 months, intestinal transplantation, age ≥3 years, and ≥7 prior episodes of gram-negative bloodstream infections. The sensitivity for classifying high-risk patients was 46%, and the specificity was 91%. CONCLUSION: A decision tree offers a novel approach to individualize patients' risk of gram-negative bloodstream infections resistant to broad-spectrum antibiotics, distinguishing children who may warrant even broader antibiotic therapy (eg, combination therapy, newer ß-lactam agents) from those for whom standard empiric antibiotic therapy is appropriate. The constructed tree needs to be validated more widely before incorporation into clinical practice.

Assessment and Management of Infection in Alcoholic Hepatitis.

Severe alcoholic hepatitis (SAH) is a condition characterized by jaundice and liver failure that develops after heavy and prolonged alcohol consumption. Infection frequently complicates the natural history of the disease and is independently associated with mortality. Objective recognition and recording of infection are therefore essential in the evaluation of therapeutic interventions and for antibiotic stewardship. This review will evaluate infections that complicate SAH at admission and beyond. Factors that associate with the development of infection will be identified and clinical and laboratory techniques available to identify infection will be discussed. Common pathogens and frequently used antibiotics will be reviewed and recommendations will be made for the management of infection for SAH patients. New techniques to assess infection earlier and more precisely may improve diagnosis and treatment of this important driver of mortality in SAH.

Cefepime/sulbactam as an enhanced antimicrobial combination therapy for the treatment of MDR Gram-negative infections.

BACKGROUND: ß-Lactam (BL)/ß-lactamase inhibitor (BLI) combinations are widely used for the treatment of Gram-negative infections. Cefepime has not been widely studied in combination with BLIs. Sulbactam, with dual BL/BLI activity, has been partnered with very few BLs. We investigated the potential of cefepime/sulbactam as an unorthodox BL/BLI combination against MDR Gram-negative bacteria. METHODS: In vitro activity of cefepime/sulbactam (1:1, 1:2 and 2:1) was assessed against 157 strains. Monte Carlo simulation was used to predict the PTA with a number of simulated cefepime combination regimens, modelled across putative cefepime/sulbactam breakpoints (≤16/≤0.25 mg/L). RESULTS: Cefepime/sulbactam was more active (MIC50/MIC90 8/8-64/128 mg/L) compared with either drug alone (MIC50/MIC90 128 to >256 mg/L). Activity was enhanced when sulbactam was added at 1:1 or 1:2 (P<0.05). Reduction in MIC was most notable against Acinetobacter baumannii and Enterobacterales (MIC 8/8-32/64 mg/L). Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling highlighted that up to 48% of all isolates and 73% of carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii with a cefepime/sulbactam MIC of ≤16/≤8 mg/L may be treatable with a high-dose, fixed-ratio (1:1 or 1:2) combination of cefepime/sulbactam. CONCLUSIONS: Cefepime/sulbactam (1:1 or 1:2) displays enhanced in vitro activity versus MDR Gram-negative pathogens. It could be a potential alternative to existing BL/BLI combinations for isolates with a cefepime/sulbactam MIC of 16/8 mg/L either as a definitive treatment or as a carbapenem-sparing option.

Fight Against Antimicrobial Resistance: We Always Need New Antibacterials but for Right Bacteria.

Antimicrobial resistance in bacteria is frightening, especially resistance in Gram-negative Bacteria (GNB). In 2017, the World Health Organization (WHO) published a list of 12 bacteria that represent a threat to human health, and among these, a majority of GNB. Antibiotic resistance is a complex and relatively old phenomenon that is the consequence of several factors. The first factor is the vertiginous drop in research and development of new antibacterials. In fact, many companies simply stop this R&D activity. The finding is simple: there are enough antibiotics to treat the different types of infection that clinicians face. The second factor is the appearance and spread of resistant or even multidrug-resistant bacteria. For a long time, this situation remained rather confidential, almost anecdotal. It was not until the end of the 1980s that awareness emerged. It was the time of Vancomycin-Resistance Enterococci (VRE), and the threat of Vancomycin-Resistant MRSA (Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus). After this, there has been renewed interest but only in anti-Gram positive antibacterials. Today, the threat is GNB, and we have no new molecules with innovative mechanism of action to fight effectively against these bugs. However, the war against antimicrobial resistance is not lost. We must continue the fight, which requires a better knowledge of the mechanisms of action of anti-infectious agents and concomitantly the mechanisms of resistance of infectious agents.

Economic burden of antibiotic resistance in ESKAPE organisms: a systematic review.

Background: Antibiotic resistance (ABR) is one of the biggest threats to global health. Infections by ESKAPE (Enterococcus, S. aureus, K. pneumoniae, A. baumannii, P. aeruginosa, and E. coli) organisms are the leading cause of healthcare-acquired infections worldwide. ABR in ESKAPE organisms is usually associated with significant higher morbidity, mortality, as well as economic burden. Directing attention towards the ESKAPE organisms can help us to better combat the wide challenge of ABR, especially multi-drug resistance (MDR). Objective: This study aims to systematically review and evaluate the evidence of the economic consequences of ABR or MDR ESKAPE organisms compared with susceptible cases or control patients without infection/colonization in order to determine the impact of ABR on economic burden. Methods: Both English-language databases and Chinese-language databases up to 16 January, 2019 were searched to identify relevant studies assessing the economic burden of ABR. Studies reported hospital costs (charges) or antibiotic cost during the entire hospitalization and during the period before/after culture among patients with ABR or MDR ESKAPE organisms were included. The costs were converted into 2015 United States Dollars. Disagreements were resolved by a third reviewer. Results: Of 13,693 studies identified, 83 eligible studies were included in our review. The most studied organism was S. aureus, followed by Enterococcus, A. baumannii, E. coli, E. coli or/and K. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa, and K. pneumoniae. There were 71 studies on total hospital cost or charge, 12 on antibiotic cost, 11 on hospital cost or charge after culture, 4 on ICU cost, 2 on hospital cost or charge before culture, and 2 on total direct and indirect cost. In general, ABR or MDR ESKAPE organisms are significantly associated with higher economic burden than those with susceptible organisms or those without infection or colonization. Nonetheless, there were no differences in a few studies between the two groups on total hospital cost or charge (16 studies), antibiotic cost (one study), hospital cost before culture (one study), hospital cost after culture (one study). Even, one reported that costs associated with MSSA infection were higher than the costs for similar MRSA cases. Conclusions: ABR in ESKAPE organisms is not always, but usually, associated with significantly higher economic burden. The results without significant differences may lack statistical power to detect a significant association. In addition, study design which controls for severity of illness and same empirical antibiotic therapy in the two groups would be expected to bias the study towards a similar, even negative result. The review also highlights key areas where further research is needed.

Clinical and economic impact of generic versus brand name meropenem use in an intensive care unit in Colombia

Abstract Background: Recent studies suggest that sustained use of generic antibiotics may be associated with clinical failure and emergence of antibacterial resistance. The present study was designed to determine the clinical outcome between the use of generic meropenem (GM) and brand-name meropenem (BNM). Additionally, this study evaluated the economic impact of GM and BNM to determine if the former represents a cost-effective alternative to the latter. Methods: Patients treated between January 2011 and May 2014 received GM while patients treated between June 2014 and March 2017 received BNM. Mortality was compared between groups. Total infection cost was defined by the cost of antimicrobial consumption, length of stay, and laboratory and imaging exams until infection resolution. Findings: A total of 168 patients were included; survival rate for the 68 patients treated with GM was 38% compared to 59% in the patients treated with BNM. Multivariate analysis showed that the variables most strongly-associated with mortality were cardiovascular disease (OR 18.18, 95% CI 1.25-262.3, p = 0.033) and treatment with generic meropenem (OR 18.45, 95% CI 1.45-232.32, p = 0.024). On the other hand, total infection cost did not show a significant difference between groups (BNM $10,771 vs. GM $11,343; p = 0.91). Interpretation: The present study suggests that patients treated with GM have a risk of death 18 times higher compared to those treated with BNM. Furthermore, economic analysis shows that GM is not more cost effective than BNM. Summary: More studies measuring clinical outcomes are needed to confirm the clinical equivalence of brand-name versus generic antibiotics, not only for meropenem but also for other molecules.

Clinical cure rate and cost-effectiveness of carbapenem-sparing beta-lactams vs. meropenem for Gram-negative infections: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and cost-effectiveness analysis.

The increasing incidence of infections caused by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)/AmpC-producing bacteria leads to increasing use of carbapenems and risk of carbapenem resistance. Treatment success of carbapenem-sparing beta-lactams (CSBs) for ESBL infections is unclear. The aim of this study was to appraise the clinical cure rate and estimate the cost-effectiveness of meropenem vs. CSBs (piperacillin-tazobactam, temocillin, ceftazidime-avibactam, and ceftolozane-tazobactam) for urinary tract infections (UTIs) or intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) due to ESBL/AmpC-producing bacteria. A systematic literature search of the Cochrane library, EMBASE, PubMed, and Web of Science was conducted to identify studies assessing the clinical cure rate of the antibiotics. To assess the cost-effectiveness of CSBs vs. meropenem, a combined decision analytic and Markov model was probabilistically analysed over a 5-year period. The main outcome was presented as the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio and evaluated with a threshold of €20 000 per life year gained (LYG). From 656 identified articles, 17 and 14 studies were included in the qualitative synthesis and quantitative synthesis, respectively. A clinical cure of ceftazidime-avibactam and ceftolozane-tazobactam was comparable to meropenem in patients with complicated IAIs (cIAIs) due to ESBL (Risk ratio [RR]=1·04, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0·95-1·13). Both temocillin and ceftolozane-tazobactam were deemed cost-effective compared to meropenem with €157·58 and €13 398·34 per LYG, respectively, in patients with UTIs due to ESBL. However, only ceftazidime-avibactam (plus metronidazole) was cost-effective for the treatment of IAIs, with €16 916·77 per LYG. These results show that several CSBs can be considered as viable candidates for the treatment of UTIs and IAIs caused by ESBL.

Clinical and economic impact of generic versus brand name meropenem use in an intensive care unit in Colombia.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies suggest that sustained use of generic antibiotics may be associated with clinical failure and emergence of antibacterial resistance. The present study was designed to determine the clinical outcome between the use of generic meropenem (GM) and brand-name meropenem (BNM). Additionally, this study evaluated the economic impact of GM and BNM to determine if the former represents a cost-effective alternative to the latter. METHODS: Patients treated between January 2011 and May 2014 received GM while patients treated between June 2014 and March 2017 received BNM. Mortality was compared between groups. Total infection cost was defined by the cost of antimicrobial consumption, length of stay, and laboratory and imaging exams until infection resolution. FINDINGS: A total of 168 patients were included; survival rate for the 68 patients treated with GM was 38% compared to 59% in the patients treated with BNM. Multivariate analysis showed that the variables most strongly-associated with mortality were cardiovascular disease (OR 18.18, 95% CI 1.25-262.3, p = 0.033) and treatment with generic meropenem (OR 18.45, 95% CI 1.45-232.32, p = 0.024). On the other hand, total infection cost did not show a significant difference between groups (BNM $10,771 vs. GM $11,343; p = 0.91). INTERPRETATION: The present study suggests that patients treated with GM have a risk of death 18 times higher compared to those treated with BNM. Furthermore, economic analysis shows that GM is not more cost effective than BNM. SUMMARY: More studies measuring clinical outcomes are needed to confirm the clinical equivalence of brand-name versus generic antibiotics, not only for meropenem but also for other molecules.

[Etiological significance and antibioticosensetivity of certain microorganisms in aggravation of chronical bronchopulmonary pathology in workers of diverse economic sectors.]

It has been shown that in patients with upper respiratory diseases of occupational etiology gram negative flora prevail (38% of cases). They are followed by yeast-like fungi (up to 36% of cases), gram positive flora - 26%. The most effective antibacterial agents for treating golden staphilococcus in patients of the group studied are cefotaxime, sparfloxacine, levofloloxacine. Cefotoxime, ceftriaxon, ciprofloxacine are used against intestinal bacteria. Cefepim, ceftazidim are used against non-fermenting gram negative bacteria. C.Albicans can be treated with amfotericine and fluconazol.

A Novel Algorithm to Analyze Epidemiology and Outcomes of Carbapenem Resistance Among Patients With Hospital-Acquired and Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Carbapenem resistance is a growing concern. Applying a novel algorithm, we examined epidemiology and outcomes of carbapenem resistance among gram-negative pathogens in hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). METHODS: In a retrospective cohort design within the Premier Research database (2009-2016), all hospitalized adult patients with a gram-negative organism in a respiratory or blood culture specimen who fit criteria for HAP/VAP based on International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification, codes were included in the study. RESULTS: Among 8,969 patients with HAP/VAP, 1,059 isolates (11.8%) were carbapenem-resistant (CR) organisms. Patients with CR organisms were more likely female (41.4% vs 33.2%; P < .001) and medical admissions (33.8% vs 27.4%, P < .001) than those with carbapenem-susceptible (CS) organisms. Patients with carbapenem resistance had higher comorbidity burden than those with carbapenem susceptibility (median [interquartile range] Charlson Comorbidity Index score, 3 [1-4] vs 2 [1-4]; P < .001). Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the most common gram-negative pathogen overall (24.9%) and among CS organisms (23.5%), and was second to Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (44.0%) among CR organisms (35.3%). Acinetobacter baumannii accounted for 11.8% of CR organisms and 2.5% of CS organisms (P < .001). Patients with carbapenem resistance were more likely than those with carbapenem susceptibility to receive inappropriate empiric therapy (25.8% vs 10.0%; P < .001). Carbapenem resistance did not affect adjusted mortality (22.9% CR vs 21.6% CS) or postinfection length of stay (except among survivors of VAP), but it was associated with excess costs ($8,921; 95% CI, 3,864-13,977). CONCLUSIONS: Using administrative data, our novel algorithm identified patients with pneumonia at high risk for death, consistent with HAP/VAP. Among them, carbapenem resistance occurred in 12% of all cases and was associated with substantial excess in hospital costs.

Impact of an infectious diseases specialist-led antimicrobial stewardship programmes on antibiotic use and antimicrobial resistance in a large Korean hospital.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of an infectious diseases specialist (IDS)-led antimicrobial stewardship programmes (ASPs) in a large Korean hospital. An interrupted time series analysis assessing the trends in antibiotic use and antimicrobial resistance rate of major pathogens between September 2015 and August 2017 was performed in an 859-bed university-affiliated hospital in Korea. The restrictive measure for designated antibiotics led by an IDS reduced carbapenems usage by -4.57 days of therapy (DOT)/1,000 patient-days per month in general wards (GWs) (95% confidence interval [CI], -6.69 to -2.46; P < 0.001), and by -41.50 DOT/1,000 patient-days per month in intensive care units (ICUs) (95% CI, -57.91 to -25.10; P < 0.001). Similarly, glycopeptides usage decreased by -2.61 DOT/1,000 patient-days per month in GWs (95% CI, -4.43 to -0.79; P = 0.007), and -27.41 DOT/1,000 patient-days per month in ICUs (95% CI, -47.03 to -7.79; P = 0.009). Use of 3rd generation cephalosporins, beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitors, and fluoroquinolones in GWs showed change comparable with that of carbapenems or glycopeptides use. Furthermore, trends of antimicrobial resistance rate of Staphylococcus aureus to gentamicin in GWs, Staphylococcus aureus to ciprofloxacin and oxacillin in ICUs, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa to imipenem in ICUs decreased in slope in the intervention period. The in-hospital mortality rate per 1,000 patient-days among ICU patients remained stable between the pre-intervention and intervention periods. In conclusion, an IDS-led ASPs could enact a meaningful reduction in antibiotic use, and a decrease in antibiotic resistance rate, without changing mortality rates in a large Korean hospital.