Assessment and biological significance of JC polyomavirus in colorectal cancer in Tunisia.

PURPOSE: Several reports have indicated the presence of JC polyomavirus (JCV) in many human tumors, including colorectal cancers (CRCs). The presence of JCV infection in CRC patients has not been investigated in African countries. METHODS: We examined the prevalence and the biological significance of JCV in Tunisian CRC patients. The presence of JCV was assessed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in a series of 105 CRCs and 89 paired non-tumor colonic mucosa samples from Tunisian patients. Results were correlated with the clinicopathological features and immunohistochemical expression of ß-catenin, p53, and the proliferation marker Ki-67. RESULTS: JCV DNA was detected in 58.1% (61/105) of CRC and in only 14.6% (13/89) of paired non tumor colonic mucosa samples (p=0.03). The presence of JCV was significantly correlated with tumor differentiation (p=0.03). Moreover, JCV presence was significantly correlated with nuclear accumulation of ß-catenin (p=0.008) and p53 accumulation (p=0.0001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that tumor differentiation, ß-catenin and p53 accumulation were independent parameters significantly associated with the presence of JCV in CRC (p=0.04; p=0.05; p=0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: We support a role of JCV in colorectal carcinogenesis in Tunisian patients, especially of well differentiated morphology.

Comparison of low versus high tacrolimus levels in kidney transplantation: assessment of efficacy by protocol biopsies.

BACKGROUND: The use of calcineurin inhibitors is generally guided by drug blood levels. However, those levels are chosen based on clinical experience, lacking adequate titration studies. METHODS: In these analyses, we compared clinical and histologic endpoints in two groups of kidney transplant recipients: in the first (HiTAC, January 2000 to June 2002, n=245) tacrolimus levels were significantly higher than in the second (LoTAC, July 2002 to September 2004, n=330). This change in drug levels (15% reduction) was made in an attempt to reduce the incidence of polyoma virus nephropathy (PVAN). Other immunosuppressive medications were unchanged during these two time periods. RESULTS: The recipient and donor demographics were not statistically different between the two groups. Compared to HiTAC, at one year posttransplant LoTAC had: 1) lower incidence of PVAN (10.5% vs. 2.5%, P<0.0001); 2) lower fasting glucose levels; 3) higher iothalamate glomerular filtration rate (52+/-19 vs. 59+/-17 ml/min/m, P<0.0001); and 4) on protocol one-year biopsies, lower incidence and severity of interstitial fibrosis (67% vs. 45%, P=0.003) and tubular atrophy (82% vs., 66%, P=0.01). The incidence and severity of acute rejection episodes was similar between both groups (7.8% versus 7.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Modest reductions in tacrolimus exposure early posttransplant are associated with significant beneficial effects for the patient and the allograft without an increased immunologic risk.

Periodic assessment of urine and serum by cytology and molecular biology as a diagnostic tool for BK virus nephropathy in renal transplant patients.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the significance of polyomavirus (PV) viruria and viremia by morphologic, immunohistochemical and molecular analysis (multiplex nested-polymerase chain reaction) in renal transplant patients. STUDY DESIGN: Urine (n=328), serum (n= 53) and renal biopsies (n=24) from renal transplant patients (n=106) were studied. RESULTS: Decoy cells were found in 53 samples (16%) from 19 patients (18%); viral DNA was amplified in all urinary samples and disclosed BK virus (BKV) (n=24), JC virus (JCV) (n=16), and JCV and BKV DNA (n=13). BKV was the prevailing genotype in patients with a high frequency of decoy cell excretion (p = 0.001). JCV excretion correlated with a low number (p = 0.01) and BKV with a high number of decoy cells (p=0.003). PV DNA was amplified from 30/53 serum samples (56.6%); BKV was the prevailing genotype (p = 0.04). On 24 renal biopsies (18 from the decoy cell-negative and 6 from the decoy cell-positive group) PV nephropathy (PVN) was identified and BKV DNA amplified in 4 biopsies, all from the group with a high frequency of decoy cell excretion. PVN was not identified in renal biopsies from the decoy cell-negative group. CONCLUSION: PV infection is frequent in renal transplant patients. The BKV genotype in urine and serum is significantly related to a high frequency and high number of decoy cells. PVN occurs only in patients with BKV viremia and a high number and frequency of decoy cell excretion in urine. In the absence of decoy cells, PVN can be excluded. Cytologic analysis of urine is an important diagnostic tool for screening renal transplant patients at risk of PVN.