Innovative approaches to biologic development on the trail of CT-P13: biosimilars, value-added medicines, and biobetters.

The biosimilar concept is now well established. Clinical data accumulated pre- and post-approval have supported biosimilar uptake, in turn stimulating competition in the biologics market and increasing patient access to biologics. Following technological advances, other innovative biologics, such as "biobetters" or "value-added medicines," are now reaching the market. These innovative biologics differ from the reference product by offering additional clinical or non-clinical benefits. We discuss these innovative biologics with reference to CT-P13, initially available as an intravenous (IV) biosimilar of reference infliximab. A subcutaneous (SC) formulation, CT-P13 SC, has now been developed. Relative to CT-P13 IV, CT-P13 SC offers clinical benefits in terms of pharmacokinetics, with comparable efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity, as well as increased convenience for patients and reduced demands on healthcare system resources. As was once the case for biosimilars, nomenclature and regulatory pathways for innovative biologics require clarification to support their uptake and ultimately benefit patients.

Prediction of treatment failure during infliximab induction therapy in inflammatory bowel disease patients based on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling.

BACKGROUND: In infliximab (IFX) treatment for Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), it is difficult to predict treatment failure during the induction phase. In the present study for optimal IFX treatment, we attempted to estimate serum IFX concentration and clinical response in individual patients during the induction phase to predict the indication of therapeutic effect and the possibility of treatment failure in the maintenance phase. METHODS: We estimated pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) parameters and predicted the serum IFX concentration and clinical response using a PK/PD model and Markov chain Monte Carlo Bayesian analysis method during the induction phase. Then, we determined whether the indication of therapeutic effect between predicted and observed clinical response were matched during the maintenance phase. RESULTS: Data obtained from 15 patients were analyzed. The correlation between predicted and observed values of serum IFX concentration (Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient, 0.700; P < 0.0001, n = 68) and clinical response of CD patients (0.790; P < 0.0001, n = 25) and UC patients (0.702; P = 0.0004, n = 21) were significantly high. The indication of therapeutic effect at the final time point of each patient (from day 115 to day 203) were successfully predicted in 14 of 15 patients (93.3%). CONCLUSIONS: This study presents prediction of serum IFX concentration and clinical response in individual patients during induction therapy, with presumption of the indication of therapeutic effect and the treatment failure in the maintenance phase. Our results show the possibility of optimizing IFX therapy during the induction phase.

Assessment of Placental Disposition of Infliximab and Etanercept in Women With Autoimmune Diseases and in the Ex Vivo Perfused Placenta.

Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors are increasingly applied during pregnancy without clear knowledge of the impact on placenta and fetus. We assessed placental transfer and exposure to infliximab (n = 3) and etanercept (n = 3) in women with autoimmune diseases. Furthermore, we perfused healthy term placentas for 6 hours with 100 µg/mL infliximab (n = 4) or etanercept (n = 5). In pregnant women, infliximab transferred into cord blood but also entered the placenta (cord-to-maternal ratio of 1.6 ± 0.4, placenta-to-maternal ratio of 0.3 ± 0.1, n = 3). For etanercept, a cord-to-maternal ratio of 0.04 and placenta-to-maternal ratio of 0.03 was observed in one patient only. In ex vivo placenta perfusions, the extent of placental transfer did not differ between the drugs. Final concentrations in the fetal compartment for infliximab and etanercept were 0.3 ± 0.3 and 0.2 ± 0.2 µg/mL, respectively. However, in placental tissue, infliximab levels exceeded those of etanercept (19 ± 6 vs. 1 ± 3 µg/g, P < 0.001). In conclusion, tissue exposure to infliximab is higher than that of etanercept both in vivo as well as in ex vivo perfused placentas. However, initial placental transfer, as observed ex vivo, does not differ between infliximab and etanercept when administered in equal amounts. The difference in placental tissue exposure to infliximab and etanercept may be of clinical relevance and warrants further investigation. More specifically, we suggest that future studies should look into the occurrence of placental TNF inhibition and possible consequences thereof.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of infliximab compared to standard clinical treatment with infliximab: study protocol for a randomised, controlled, open, parallel-group, phase IV study (the NOR-DRUM study).

BACKGROUND: Infliximab (INX) and other tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) have revolutionised the treatment of several immune mediated inflammatory diseases. Still, many patients do not respond sufficiently to therapy or lose efficacy over time. The large interindividual variation in serum drug concentrations on standard doses and the development of anti-drug antibodies are thought to be major reasons for treatment failures. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), an individualised treatment strategy based on systematic assessments of serum drug concentrations, has been proposed as a clinical tool to optimise efficacy of INX treatment. TDM seems reasonable both from a clinical and an economical point of view, but the effectiveness of this treatment strategy has not yet been demonstrated in randomised clinical trials. The NORwegian DRUg Monitoring study (NOR-DRUM) aims to assess the effectiveness of TDM, both with regard to the achievement of remission in patients starting INX treatment (part A) as well as to maintain disease control in patients on INX treatment (part B). METHODS: The NOR-DRUM study is a randomised, open, controlled, parallel-group, comparative, multi-centre, national, superiority, phase IV study with two separate parts, NOR-DRUM A and NOR-DRUM B. Patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, spondyloarthritis, ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease and psoriasis are included. In both study parts participants are randomised 1:1 to either TDM of infliximab (intervention group) or to standard treatment with infliximab without knowledge of drug levels or ADAb status (control group). NOR-DRUM A will include 400 patients starting INX therapy. The primary outcome is remission at 30 weeks. In NOR-DRUM B, 450 patients on maintenance treatment with INX will be included. The primary endpoint is occurrence of disease worsening during the 52-week study period. DISCUSSION: As the first trial to assess the effectiveness, safety and cost-effectiveness of TDM in patients receiving TNFi for a range of immune mediated inflammatory diseases, we hope that the NOR-DRUM study will contribute to the advancement of evidence based personalised treatment with biological medicines. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03074656. Registered on 090317.

Implementation of infliximab standardized doses after pharmacokinetic modelization in a cohort of patients with Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND: According to infliximab (IFX) license in Crohn's disease (CD), infusion doses are based on patient's body-weight. Dose banding providing standardized doses (SD) has been implemented in parenteral chemotherapy in order to optimize aseptic unit capacity and reduce drug expenditure, duration of hospital stay and costs without decreasing efficacy. MATERIAL AND METHOD: The first part was a single-center retrospective analysis of consecutive CD patients receiving IFX maintenance therapy to determine standardized doses covering more than 50% of infusions. The second part was a prospective cohort study assessing the impact of SD compared to body-weight doses (BWD) on admission duration and costs. RESULTS: Six IFX SD covering more than 90% of infusion doses were implemented for dose banding. According to the Monte-Carlo simulation, there was no significant difference between IFX SD and BWD maintenance regimens. When assessed prospectively in 116 patients (75 patients treated with SD and 41 with BWD) corresponding to 128 infusions, hospitalization duration was shortened by 70 min per patient (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: According to a pharmacokinetic model, IFX SD has a pharmacokinetic profile close to BWD and is associated with reduced length of hospitalization in a cohort of patients with CD. IFX SD implementation could optimize infusion units functioning and, save time and costs without decreasing efficacy.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of infliximab in spondyloarthritis. A review of the literature.

Available evidence indicates that a therapeutic drug monitoring strategy leads to major cost savings related to the anti-tumour necrosis factor-α therapy in both inflammatory bowel disease and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, with no negative impact on efficacy. However, although the systematic use of therapeutic drug monitoring could potentially be beneficial and economically acceptable to drug dose optimization, it is not justifiable for all drugs. Infliximab (IFX) is a chimeric monoclonal immunoglobulin G1 targeting tumour necrosis factor. It has been approved for the treatment of immuno-inflammatory diseases, including RA, ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis, Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. IFX's pharmacokinetics is highly variable and influences clinical response in chronic inflammatory diseases. Clinical response increases with IFX trough concentrations in RA, ankylosing spondylitis, inflammatory bowel disease and psoriatic patients. Target concentrations predictive of good clinical response were proposed in RA, Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. The purpose of this article is to review the current literature surrounding IFX serum concentrations and their related parameters with disease activity in patients with spondyloarthritis. Gathering information about the efficacy of IFX in patients with spondyloarthritis and relating IFX serum concentrations to disease activity were the main goals of this study.

Success and safety of high infliximab trough levels in inflammatory bowel disease.

OBJECTIVE: A prospective trial suggests target infliximab trough levels of 3-7 µg/mL, yet data on additional therapeutic benefits and safety of higher trough levels are scarce. AIM: To explore whether high infliximab trough levels (≥7 µg/mL) are more effective and still safe. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this cohort study of 183 patients (109 Crohn's disease and 74 ulcerative colitis) on infliximab maintenance treatment at a tertiary referral center we correlated fecal calprotectin and C-reactive protein to trough levels (426 samples) at different time points during treatment. Rates of infections were compared in quadrimesters (four-month periods) with high trough levels to quadrimesters with trough levels <7 µg/mL during 420 patient-years. RESULTS: Fecal calprotectin and C-reactive protein (median [interquartile range]) were lower in patients with high trough levels (fecal calprotectin 66 mg/kg [30-257]; C-reactive protein 3 mg/L [3-3]) compared to trough levels below 7 µg/mL (fecal calprotectin 155 mg/kg [72-474]; C-reactive protein 3 mg/L [3-14.5]) (p < .001). High trough levels were superior also after excluding samples with trough levels <3 µg/mL from analysis. No differences in rates of infections were observed in quadrimesters with high trough levels (16/129 [12.4%]) compared to quadrimesters with trough levels <7 µg/mL (32/344 [9.3%]) (p = .32). Maintaining high trough levels resulted in 32% (interquartile range: 2-54%) increase of infliximab consumption. CONCLUSION: High infliximab trough levels provide better control of inflammation in inflammatory bowel disease without increasing the risk of infection.

Infliximab Maintenance Dosing in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: an Example for In Silico Assessment of Adaptive Dosing Strategies.

Infliximab is an anti-tumour necrosis factor alpha monoclonal antibody used to treat inflammatory diseases. Many patients fail during induction and others respond initially but relapse during maintenance therapy. Although anti-drug antibodies (ADA) are associated with some clinical failures, there is evidence that some failures may be due to subtherapeutic exposure. Adapting doses based on clinical outcomes and trough concentrations can improve response and reduce the proportion that develop ADA, but identification of appropriate doses in the presence of time-varying patient factors is complicated. Several adaptive dosing strategies (label recommendations versus therapeutic drug monitoring with an established stepwise algorithm or proportional dose adjustments or Bayesian population pharmacokinetic model-based dosing) were simulated on a virtual population (constructed with time-varying covariates and random effects on individual pharmacokinetic parameters) using R to assess their relative performance. Strategies were evaluated on their ability to maintain trough infliximab concentrations above an established target, 3 mg/L, during maintenance phase. Model-based dosing was superior in maintaining target trough concentrations, showing individuals in maintenance achieving concentrations above the target faster and a lower proportion of individuals who developed ADA. Model-based dosing results were consistent across a range of baseline covariate groups. This in silico assessment of adaptive dosing strategies demonstrated that, when challenged with dynamic covariate and random effect changes occurring in individual pharmacokinetic parameters, model-based approaches were superior to other strategies. Model-based dosing has not been tested clinically; however, the potential benefits of model-based dosing for infliximab suggest that it should be investigated to reduce subtherapeutic exposure.

Infliximab Dosing Strategies and Predicted Trough Exposure in Children With Crohn Disease.

OBJECTIVES: Standard infliximab maintenance dosing of 5 mg/kg every 8 weeks may be inadequate to consistently achieve sufficient drug exposure to minimize loss of response or treatment failure in pediatric Crohn disease (CD). We aimed to determine the predicted infliximab trough concentrations in children with CD during maintenance therapy and the percentage of patients achieving target trough concentration >3 µg/mL. METHODS: A Monte Carlo simulation analysis was constructed using a published population pharmacokinetic model based on data from 112 children in the REACH trial. We assessed maintenance dosing strategies of 5, 7.5, and 10 mg/kg at dosing intervals of every 4, 6, and 8 weeks for children that differed by age, weight, albumin level, and concomitant immunomodulator therapy. RESULTS: Based on the index case of a 10-year-old with CD receiving standard infliximab dosing with concomitant immunomodulator therapy, the median (interquartile range) simulated infliximab trough concentration at week 14 was 1.3 (0.5-2.7) µg/mL and 2.4 (1.0-4.8) µg/mL for albumin levels of 3 and 4 g/dL, respectively. Among 1000 simulated children in the model, trough concentration >3 µg/mL at week 14 was achieved 21% and 41% of the time for albumin levels of 3 and 4 g/dL, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Standard infliximab maintenance dosing in children with CD is predicted to frequently result in inadequate exposure, especially when albumin levels are low. Optimized dosing strategies for individual patients are needed to achieve sufficient drug exposure during infliximab maintenance therapy.

Population pharmacokinetics of infliximab in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: potential implications for dosing in clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: Infliximab (IFX) is effective in the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). Currently, IFX is administered at fixed doses and intervals; however, costs are high and optimisation is necessary. Several publications indicate that IFX should be dosed on trough levels ≥3.0 mg/L. For optimising IFX dosing, the use of a pharmacokinetic model is important. Population pharmacokinetics of IFX have been described earlier; however, these models were not used for dose optimising. AIMS: To develop a pharmacokinetic model for IFX in IBD patients that can be used for dose-optimisation of IFX and to predict serum trough levels in this population. METHODS: An observational retrospective study was performed in 42 IFX-treated IBD patients. Serum samples were drawn before infusion at T = 0, 2, 6, 14, 22 and 54 weeks and analysed for IFX and antibodies against IFX (ATI). Relevant covariates were recorded and a population pharmacokinetic model was developed. RESULTS: Individual plots created using the final model showed good correspondence between observed and model predicted values. Serum levels were influenced by ATI, disease activity, sex and albumin. Our results show that in patients without ATI target trough levels ≥3.0 mg/L can be achieved by increasing dosing intervals from 8 to 12 weeks combined with a dose increase. This results in a reduction of 33% in concomitant costs. CONCLUSIONS: In IBD patients without ATI, trough level dosing based on longer intervals can reduce IFX therapy-related visits to the hospital with one-third. Trough level based dose intensification should always be justified by disease activity parameters.

A pharmacokinetic approach to model-guided design of infliximab schedules in ulcerative colitis patients.

BACKGROUND: Infliximab, an anti-tumour necrosis factor approved for treatment of Crohn´s disease and ulcerative colitis, is administered at predefined interdose intervals. On insufficient response or loss of response, treatment can be intensified. The lack or loss of response is likely related to complex pharmacokinetics of infliximab. AIMS: To explore optimal dosing strategies of infliximab in treatment-naïve patients with ulcerative colitis through predictive Monte Carlo simulations based on a validated population PK model. METHODS: A population of 2,000 treatment-naïve patients was generated by Montecarlo simulation. Six dosing strategies for maintenance therapy were simulated on this population. Strategies 1 and 2 consisted on 5 mg/kg and 6 mg/kg doses, respectively, and 8 weeks inter-dose interval. Strategies 3 and 4 used Individualized doses, adjusted to albumin level, sex and body weight, and a fix interdose interval of 8 weeks to achieve a target trough concentration of 5 mg/L or 6 mg/L, respectively. Strategies 5 and 6 used a fix dose of 5 mg/kg and individualized inter-dose intervals, adjusted to the same covariates, to achieve a target concentration, of 5 mg/L or 6 mg/L, respectively. RESULTS: Strategies 2-6 reached trough levels statistically higher than strategy 1 (p < 0.05). Strategy 5 proved to be the best dosing strategy. It was associated with a higher proportion of responder patients than strategy 1 (62 % vs. 40 %) without reaching higher peak concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: Optimization of maintenance treatment of colitis with infliximab by a pharmacokinetic approach could benefit infliximab-naive patients with ulcerative colitis.

Assessment of the Influence of Inflammation and FCGR3A Genotype on Infliximab Pharmacokinetics and Time to Relapse in Patients with Crohn's Disease.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Infliximab is a monoclonal anti-tumor necrosis factor-α (anti-TNFα) antibody that profoundly modified the treatment of Crohn's disease (CD). The polymorphism of Fc fragment of IgG, low affinity IIIa, receptor (CD16a) [FCGR3A] influences the biological response to infliximab in patients with CD. Our aim was to study its influence on infliximab pharmacokinetics and risk of relapse after infliximab discontinuation. METHODS: In 111 CD patients in remission, infliximab was discontinued and its concentrations were measured for 30 months or until relapse. Infliximab pharmacokinetics were described using monocompartmental population modeling. RESULTS: The elimination rate of infliximab increased with C-reactive protein (CRP) [p = 0.00018] and was 16 % higher in FCGR3A-158V/V patients than in F carriers (p = 0.0028). Risk of relapse was higher in patients with baseline CRP ≥5 mg/L than in those with a lower value (p = 0.0000029). In addition, there was a first-order interaction between CRP and the FCGR3A genotype; in patients with high CRP, risk of relapse was higher for V/V patients than for F carriers (hazard ratio 4.80 and 2.84 for V/V and F carriers, respectively; p = 0.013). CONCLUSION: Both increased inflammation and FCGR3A-158V/V genotype are associated with increased infliximab elimination and risk of relapse after infliximab discontinuation in patients with CD.