Prediction of treatment failure during infliximab induction therapy in inflammatory bowel disease patients based on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling.

BACKGROUND: In infliximab (IFX) treatment for Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), it is difficult to predict treatment failure during the induction phase. In the present study for optimal IFX treatment, we attempted to estimate serum IFX concentration and clinical response in individual patients during the induction phase to predict the indication of therapeutic effect and the possibility of treatment failure in the maintenance phase. METHODS: We estimated pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) parameters and predicted the serum IFX concentration and clinical response using a PK/PD model and Markov chain Monte Carlo Bayesian analysis method during the induction phase. Then, we determined whether the indication of therapeutic effect between predicted and observed clinical response were matched during the maintenance phase. RESULTS: Data obtained from 15 patients were analyzed. The correlation between predicted and observed values of serum IFX concentration (Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient, 0.700; P < 0.0001, n = 68) and clinical response of CD patients (0.790; P < 0.0001, n = 25) and UC patients (0.702; P = 0.0004, n = 21) were significantly high. The indication of therapeutic effect at the final time point of each patient (from day 115 to day 203) were successfully predicted in 14 of 15 patients (93.3%). CONCLUSIONS: This study presents prediction of serum IFX concentration and clinical response in individual patients during induction therapy, with presumption of the indication of therapeutic effect and the treatment failure in the maintenance phase. Our results show the possibility of optimizing IFX therapy during the induction phase.

Proactive Vs Reactive Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Infliximab in Crohn's Disease: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in a Simulated Cohort.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is increasingly performed for Infliximab (IFX) in patients with Crohn's disease (CD). Reactive TDM is a cost-effective strategy to empiric IFX dose escalation. The cost-effectiveness of proactive TDM is unknown. The aim of this study is to assess the cost-effectiveness of proactive vs reactive TDM in a simulated population of CD patients on IFX. METHODS: We developed a stochastic simulation model of CD patients on IFX and evaluated the expected health costs and outcomes of a proactive TDM strategy compared with a reactive strategy. The proactive strategy measured IFX concentration and antibody status every 6 months, or at the time of a flare, and dosed IFX to a therapeutic window. The reactive strategy only did so at the time of a flare. RESULTS: The proactive strategy led to fewer flares than the reactive strategy. More patients stayed on IFX in the proactive vs reactive strategy (63.4% vs 58.8% at year 5). From a health sector perspective, a proactive strategy was marginally cost-effective compared with a reactive strategy (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $146,494 per quality-adjusted life year), assuming a 40% of the wholesale price of IFX. The results were most sensitive to risk of flaring with a low IFX concentration and the cost of IFX. CONCLUSIONS: Assuming 40% of the average wholesale acquisition cost of biologic therapies, proactive TDM for IFX is marginally cost-effective compared with a reactive TDM strategy. As the cost of infliximab decreases, a proactive monitoring strategy is more cost-effective.

Clinical relevance of detecting anti-infliximab antibodies with a drug-tolerant assay: post hoc analysis of the TAXIT trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical relevance of antidrug antibodies (ADAs) measured using a drug-tolerant assay in a post hoc analysis of the Trough Concentration (TC) Adapted Infliximab Treatment (TAXIT) randomised controlled trial. DESIGN: ADA in serum samples (n=221) of 76 patients enrolled in TAXIT, who presented with an infliximab TC <3 µg/mL at screening, were reanalysed after optimisation and at the end of the study using a drug-tolerant ADA assay. Patients underwent dose escalation to achieve therapeutic TCs between 3 µg/mL and 7 µg/mL prior to randomisation. Patients were grouped into quartiles (Q1-4) according to ADA concentration at screening. RESULTS: Using a drug-tolerant assay, the immunogenicity detection rate increased from 21% (drug-sensitive assay) to 63% at screening, from 0% to 51% after optimisation and from 3% to 42% at the end of TAXIT. Patients in ADA Q4 required a higher cumulative infliximab dose (2390 (880-2998) mg) to achieve target TCs, resulting in a higher drug cost (€10 712 (4120-13 596)) compared with ADA-negative patients (€2060 (1648-3296)) and patients in ADA Q1/Q2 (€2060 (1648-4120)/€2060 (1751-3296), p<0.001). However, all but one patient belonging to ADA Q4 were also ADA-positive using a drug-sensitive assay. CONCLUSIONS: Upon dose intensification, low concentration ADAs, not detectable using a drug-sensitive assay, disappear in more than half of the patients over time and are clinically non-relevant. In contrast, high concentration ADAs which are typically also detected in a drug-sensitive assay, persist over time and necessitate a higher cumulative dose and drug cost. In the latter group, proactive drug switching may be more cost-efficient. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTER: 2011-002061-38; Post-results.

Detection of anti-infliximab antibodies in Slovak IBD patients and its costs saving effect.

OBJECTIVE: Management chronic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients is associated with diagnosis, targeted treatment and and individual approach. There is a group of patients which loss the response to the biologic treatment caused by insufficient levels of biologics or positive antibodies against these drugs. This study was aimed to determine the prevalence of patients with positive antibodies against the biological treatment and the costs saving probabilities of the antibodies detection during the treatment. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective study was based on examination of 183 IBD patients' sera (72 with Crohn's disease (CD) and 111 ulcerative colitis (UC)) treated with infiliximab. METHODS: Circulating serum infliximab concentrations and anti-infliximab antibodies (ATI) were quantified by ELISA methods. Costs associated with the treatment were analysed from the data of General Health Insurance Company, Slovakia. RESULTS: The average infliximab concentrations in groups of CD were 2.9 µg/mL, 38.9% of samples had a concentration ≤1 µg/mL. Group with UC had average infliximab levels of 3.19 µg/mL, 32.4% bellow ≤1 µg/mL. Positive ATI levels were detected in 52 patients, in 28 patients with CD (38.8%) and 24 patients with UC (21.6%). The average values of the antibodies were 387.75 U/ml in CD and 391.94 U/ml in UC group. More than 28% IBD patients were positive for ATI. After application of the results to the database of all IBD patients, finishing of the treatment with ATI could lead (after considering the ATI quantification costs) to possible annual savings of more than €2 million in Slovakian health-care system. CONCLUSIONS: Monitoring of infliximab and antibodies against infliximab and anti-TNF-α biologics may help optimize treatment strategies and costs for biological treatment.

Short article: The effect of implementation of a treatment algorithm for infliximab on remission rates and drug costs in inflammatory bowel disease patients.

INTRODUCTION: The effective, but expensive, drug infliximab is used in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Monitoring infliximab trough levels and anti-infliximab antibody (ATI) formation can lead to a more cost-effective use of infliximab therapy. The aim of our study was to investigate the effect of implementation of a treatment algorithm for infliximab in a single-centre IBD cohort, focussing on remission rates and drug costs. METHODS: IBD patients aged 18 years or older treated with infliximab were asked to participate in this study. Remission rates were assessed using faecal calprotectin levels and a validated questionnaire. Infliximab trough levels and ATIs were determined at baseline and at the third infliximab infusion. According to the advice given by the treatment algorithm, infliximab dosage adjustments were performed at the second infliximab infusion. RESULTS: Between January and December 2015 a total of 62 IBD patients in our centre were treated with infliximab, of whom 33 (53%) patients agreed to participate in this study. The number of patients in remission was 28 (85%) at baseline and there were 13 dose adaptations suggested by the treatment algorithm for the successive second infusion. Four patients possessed undetectable infliximab levels and positive ATI status at baseline. After the second infusion, there were 29 (88%) patients in remission at the third infusion. All of this resulted in an annual drug cost reduction of &OV0556;47 026 (7.4%). CONCLUSION: Our developed treatment algorithm of infliximab led to optimization of infliximab therapy in IBD patients by increasing remission rates and reducing drug costs.

Quantification of active infliximab in human serum with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry using a tumor necrosis factor alpha -based pre-analytical sample purification and a stable isotopic labeled infliximab bio-similar as internal standard: A target-based, sensitive and cost-effective method.

The therapeutic monoclonal antibody Infliximab (IFX) is a widely used drug for the treatment of several inflammatory autoimmune diseases. However, approximately 10% of patients develop anti-infliximab antibodies (ATIs) rendering the treatment ineffective. Early detection of underexposure to unbound IFX would result in a timely switch of therapy which could aid in the treatment of this disease. Streptavidin coated 96 well plates were used to capture biotinylated-tumor necrosis factor -alpha (b-TNF-α), which in turn was used to selectively extract the active form of IFX in human serum. After elution, IFX was digested using trypsin and one signature peptide was selected for subsequent analysis on liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). The internal standard used was a stable isotopic labeled IFX bio-similar. The assay was successfully validated according to European Medicines Agency (EMA) guidelines and was found to be linear in a range of 0.5-20µg/mL (r(2)=0.994). Lower limit of quantification for the assay (<20% CV) was 0.5µg/mL, requiring only 2µL of sample. Cross-validation against enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) resulted in a high correlation between methods (r(2)=0.95 with a ρc=0.83) and the accuracy was in line with previously published results. In conclusion, a sensitive, robust and cost-effective method was developed for the bio-analysis of IFX with LC-MS/MS by means of a target-based pre-analytical sample purification. Moreover, low volume and costs of consumables per sample promote its feasibility in (pre)clinical studies and in therapeutic drug monitoring. This method should be considered as first choice due to its accuracy and multiple degree of selectivity.

Drug levels, immunogenicity and assessment of active sacroiliitis in patients with axial spondyloarthritis under biologic tapering strategy.

The aim of the study was to assess drug levels, immunogenicity and sacroiliitis on MRI in patients with axial spondyloarthritis under biologic tapering strategy. Consecutive patients with axial spondyloarthritis who remained in low disease activity more than 1 year after dose tapering of infliximab and adalimumab were included. Plasma drug concentrations of TNF inhibitors and anti-drug antibodies were determined, and MRI of sacroiliac joints was evaluated. Of twenty patients included, eighteen had therapeutic drug levels, no patient had anti-drug antibodies, and no patient had active sacroiliitis on MRI. These data could support the biologic tapering strategy and their maintenance over time.

Agreement in assessment of infliximab and adalimumab levels in rheumatoid arthritis: interlaboratory and interassay comparison.

OBJECTIVES: Infliximab (IFX) and adalimumab (ADL) drug levels and anti-drug antibodies (ADA) are assessed using a variety of techniques, therefore, results cannot accurately be compared for clinical purposes. The aim of this study was to test two infliximab (IFX) and adalimumab (ADL) ELISA versions, for drug levels and ADA, to see whether they yield similar results. METHODS: ELISA versions [Promonitor® IFX R1 and R2 (V.1), Promonitor® IFX and Anti-IFX (V.2); Promonitor® ADL R1 and R2 (V.1), Promonitor® ADL and Anti-ADL (V.2) kits (Progenika Biopharma, Spain)] were used to measure drug levels and ADA in IFX (n=24) and ADL (n=24) rheumatoid arthritis-treated patients in three independent laboratories. Quantitative and qualitative agreements were evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), and Cohen's Kappa (κ) respectively. The Bland-Altman plots assessed differences between V.1 and V.2. RESULTS: Interlaboratory agreement (ICC/κ) with V.1 was poor for IFX (0.66/0.62) and ADL (0.69/0.52) drug levels; meanwhile, high agreement was found with V.2 for IFX (0.98/0.95) and ADL (0.094/1.00). Comparison between V.1 and V.2 in each laboratory resulted in systematically higher values in V.2 than in V.1 and poor agreement (ICC/κ ranges) for IFX (0.12-0.7/ 0.19-0.42) and ADL (0.69-0.89 /0.50-0.73). CONCLUSIONS: Qualitative measurements result in better agreement, as evidenced in our study. Greater agreement in V.2 compared with V.1 for IFX and ADL levels could be due to a better tune up. Further studies are required to standardise methods to establish therapeutic reference ranges.