Brief Report: HIV Drug Resistance Assessment Among Women Who Seroconverted During the MTN-025/HOPE Open-Label Extension Dapivirine Vaginal Ring Trial.

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials of dapivirine (DPV) vaginal ring have shown it is safe, effective, and desired by women as an HIV prevention option. The risk of drug resistance is a potential concern for DPV ring users who acquire HIV. We conducted a comprehensive resistance evaluation of plasma samples from the women who seroconverted during the Microbicide Trials Network-025/HIV Open-label Prevention Extension (HOPE) study of DPV ring. METHODS: Plasma collected on the visit at which seroconversion was detected was tested by next-generation sequencing with unique molecular identifiers for non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) drug resistance mutations (DRM) present at ≥1% frequency. Bulk-cloned plasma-derived recombinant HIV was phenotyped in a TZM-bl-based assay for susceptibility to DPV and other NNRTI. HIV-1 RNA was retrospectively quantified in plasma samples collected before HIV seroconversion. RESULTS: Among 38 participants who seroconverted in HOPE, 7 (18%) had NNRTI DRM detected by next-generation sequencing with unique molecular identifiers including A98G, K103N, V106M, E138A, and V179D. Six of 7 samples with NNRTI DRM had <3-fold reduction in susceptibility to DPV. Only 1 sample with K103N and V179I polymorphism had 9-fold reduction in susceptibility to DPV, but this genotype occurred in an individual who did not use DPV ring, likely indicating transmitted resistance. Detection of NNRTI resistance was not higher in individuals who remained on DPV ring >3 months after acquiring HIV infection. CONCLUSIONS: NNRTI resistance among women who seroconverted during HOPE was infrequent and selection of DPV-specific mutations was not detected. DPV ring is considered a safe and effective option for HIV prevention in women.

Epidemiology of HIV drug resistance in low- and middle-income countries and WHO global strategy to monitor its emergence.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review summarises the latest information of the epidemiology of HIV drug resistance (HIVDR) in low- and middle-income countries and the updated WHO global strategy for HIVDR surveillance and monitoring. RECENT FINDINGS: Finding from recent national-representative surveys show a rise in pretreatment drug resistance (PDR) to reverse transcriptase inhibitors and especially to the class of nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Levels of PDR are especially high in infants <18 months and adults reporting prior exposure to antiretrovirals. Although viral suppression rates are generally high and increasing among adults on antiretroviral therapy, those with unsuppressed viremia have high levels of acquired drug resistance (ADR). Programmatic data on HIVDR to integrase-transfer-inhibitor resistance is scarce, highlighting the need to increase integrase-inhibitors resistance surveillance. As the landscape of HIV prevention, treatment and monitoring evolves, WHO has also adapted its strategy to effectively support countries in preventing and monitoring the emergence of HIVDR. This includes new survey methods for monitoring resistance emerging from patients diagnosed with HIV while on preexposure prophylaxis, and a laboratory-based ADR survey leveraging on remnant viral load specimens which are expected to strengthen dolutegravir-resistance surveillance. SUMMARY: Monitoring HIVDR remains pivotal to ensure countries attain and sustain the global goals for ending HIV as a public health threat by 2030.

An Open-Label Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Assessment of Tenofovir Gel and Oral Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate.

The Microbicide Trials Network-017 study was undertaken to characterize the safety, acceptability, pharmacokinetic (PK), and pharmacodynamic profile of the reduced-glycerin (RG) 1% tenofovir (RG-TFV) gel compared to oral emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (FTC/TDF). The study was a Phase 2, three-period, randomized sequence, open-label, expanded safety and acceptability crossover study. In each 8-week study period, HIV-1-uninfected participants were randomized to RG-TFV rectal gel daily or RG-TFV rectal gel before and after receptive anal intercourse (RAI) (or at least twice weekly in the event of no RAI), or daily oral FTC/TDF. A mucosal substudy was conducted at sites in the United States and Thailand. Samples were collected to evaluate PK and ex vivo biopsy challenge with HIV-1. A total of 195 men who have sex with men and transgender women were enrolled in the parent study and 37 in the mucosal substudy. As previously reported, both products were found to be safe and acceptable. Systemic TFV concentrations were significantly higher following oral exposure and daily rectal administration compared to RAI-associated product use (p < .001). All three routes of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) administration resulted in the inhibition of explant infection (p < .05), and there was a significant inverse correlation between explant HIV-1 p24 and tissue concentrations of TFV and FTC (p < .0001). Despite significant differences in systemic and mucosal drug concentrations, all three PrEP regimens were able to protect rectal explants from ex vivo HIV infection. These data suggest that there is a rationale for co-development of oral and topical antiretroviral PrEP for HIV prevention. Clinical Trial Registration number: NCT01687218.

First Assessment of Acquired HIV-1 Drug Resistance and Mutation Patterns in Suriname.

HIV drug resistance testing is fundamental in clinical patient management, but data on HIV-1 drug-resistant mutations (DRMs) is scarce in the Caribbean and in Suriname limited to one survey on transmitted resistance. The aim of this study was to address this gap, to gain insight in acquired HIV drug resistance (ADR) prevalence and mutation patterns, and to improve HIV-1 treatment outcome of people living with HIV (PLHIV) in Suriname. A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted from July 2018 through January 2019 among treatment-experienced PLHIV (n = 72), with either treatment failure or antiretroviral therapy restart. Genotypic drug resistance testing was performed and DRM impact on drug effectiveness was examined. Genotypic drug resistance testing revealed 97.2% HIV-1 subtype B, 2.8% B/D recombinants and a ADR prevalence of 63.2% in treatment failure patients, with a predominance of nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) mutations. The most common DRMs were M184V (23.6%) and K103N (18.8%). A high level of non-DRM polymorphisms was observed in both the reverse transcriptase (RT) and protease (PR) gene. Interesting deviations from the existing mutation datasets were noted at position E248 and R83 of the RT gene and L63 and V77 in the PR gene. Full susceptibility to all examined drugs was 54.2%, while high-level drug resistance was estimated at 37.5%, which seems promising for treatment outcomes for PLHIV in Suriname, although cross-resistance to next-generation NNRTIs was already estimated for nearly a quarter of the patients. The meager 2.9% of PR DRMs rendered protease inhibitors as an effective rescue HIV-1 treatment.

A More Efficient Causal Mediator Model Without the No-Unmeasured-Confounder Assumption.

Mediator models have been developed primarily under the assumption of no-unmeasured-confounding. In many situations, this assumption is violated and may lead to the identification of mediator variables that actually are statistical artifacts. The rank preserving model (RPM) is an alternative approach to estimate controlled direct and mediator effects. It is based on the structural mean models framework and a no-effect-modifier assumption. The RPM assumes that unobserved confounders do not interact with treatment or mediators. This assumption is often more plausible to hold than the no-unmeasured-confounder assumption. So far, models using the no-effect-modifier assumption have been rarely used, which might be due to its low power and inefficiency in many scenarios. Here, a semi-parametric nonlinear extension, the nRPM, is proposed that overcomes this inefficiency using thin plate regression splines that both increase the predictive power of the model and decrease the misspecification present in many situations. In a simulation study, it is shown that the nRPM provides estimates that are robust against the violation of the no-effect-modifier assumption and that are substantively more efficient than those of the RPM. The model is illustrated using a data set on CD4 cell counts in a context of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).

Clinical Impact and Cost-effectiveness of Genotype Testing at Human Immunodeficiency Virus Diagnosis in the United States.

BACKGROUND: US guidelines recommend genotype testing at human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) diagnosis ("baseline genotype") to detect transmitted drug resistance (TDR) to nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), and protease inhibitors. With integrase strand inhibitor (INSTI)-based regimens now recommended as first-line antiretroviral therapy (ART), the of baseline genotypes is uncertain. METHODS: We used the Cost-effectiveness of Preventing AIDS Complications model to examine the clinical impact and cost-effectiveness of baseline genotype compared to no baseline genotype for people starting ART with dolutegravir (DTG) and an NRTI pair. For people with no TDR (83.8%), baseline genotype does not alter regimen selection. Among people with transmitted NRTI resistance (5.8%), baseline genotype guides NRTI selection and informs subsequent ART after adverse events (DTG AEs, 14%). Among people with transmitted NNRTI resistance (7.2%), baseline genotype influences care only for people with DTG AEs switching to NNRTI-based regimens. The 48-week virologic suppression varied (40%-92%) depending on TDR. Costs included $320/genotype and $2500-$3000/month for ART. RESULTS: Compared to no baseline genotype, baseline genotype resulted in <1 additional undiscounted quality-adjusted life-day (QALD), cost an additional $500/person, and was not cost-effective (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio: $420 000/quality-adjusted life-year). In univariate sensitivity analysis, clinical benefits of baseline genotype never exceeded 5 QALDs for all newly diagnosed people with HIV. Baseline genotype was cost-effective at current TDR prevalence only under unlikely conditions, eg, DTG-based regimens achieving ≤50% suppression of transmitted NRTI resistance. CONCLUSIONS: With INSTI-based first-line regimens in the United States, baseline genotype offers minimal clinical benefit and is not cost-effective.

Liver safety assessment in clinical trials of new agents for chronic hepatitis B.

Investigational agents that reduce or eliminate covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) or enhance host immunity against hepatitis B virus (HBV)-infected hepatocytes are intended to induce a durable off-treatment clearance of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) (referred to as functional cure). The aim of this paper was to highlight challenges in interpreting liver safety data in clinical trials of these agents when given alone or in combination regimens. The incidence, grading and management of spontaneous serum ALT flares in untreated chronic HBV patients are reviewed along with a summary of serum ALT flares observed during the registration trials for peginterferon and nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Recommendations regarding the detection, management and interpretation of liver safety biomarker data in future clinical trials as well as suggested inclusion and exclusion criteria for phase 1/2 vs phase 3 studies are provided. Criteria to help classify liver safety signals as being due to the intended therapeutic response, emergence of drug-resistant HBV virions, or idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury are provided along with a review of the role of an expert hepatic adjudication panel in assessing a compound's hepatotoxicity profile. Finally, an algorithmic approach to the differential diagnosis and recommended medical evaluation and management of individual clinical trial patients that develop a liver safety signal is provided along with the rationale to collect and test research blood samples for future mechanistic studies.

Healthcare resource utilization and costs in patients with HIV-1 who switched first-line antiretroviral therapy.

Objectives: This study compared healthcare utilization and costs associated with switching the first-line protease inhibitor (PI) or non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) based antiretroviral (ARV) regimen due to reasons other than virologic failure among patients with HIV-1. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of commercial and Medicare Advantage with Part D enrollees in two US administrative claims databases. The study population comprised adults with HIV-1 infection initiating antiretroviral therapy (ART) on PI- or NNRTI-containing regimens from 1 January 2006 to 31 December 2015. Patients with a subsequent change in anchor agent were assigned to the switch cohort; the non-switch cohort was constructed using propensity score matching of three non-switching patients for each patient in the switch cohort. Patient characteristics and per patient per month healthcare resource utilization and costs were compared between the cohorts during the pre-switch, switch (15 days before and after switching) and post-switch periods. Costs during the switch period were also estimated with a multivariable-adjusted model. Results: The matched study population consisted of 1204 patients who switched their first-line PI- or NNRTI-based regimen and 3612 patients who did not. Compared with the non-switch cohort, patients who switched had higher healthcare resource utilization during the pre-switch, switch and post-switch periods. Mean unadjusted non-ART costs in the switch cohort were nearly double ($2944 versus $1530, p < .001), more than double ($2562 versus $1215, p < .001) and 1.5 times higher ($1473 versus $968, p < .001) than costs in the non-switch cohort in the pre-switch, switch and post-switch periods, respectively. Conclusions: Patients with HIV-1 who initiated PI- or NNRTI-based regimens and switched ARTs for reasons other than virologic failure used more healthcare resources and incurred greater costs relative to patients in the non-switch cohort. This study highlights the importance of initiating patients on appropriate first-line ART to avoid the need to switch due to reasons other than virologic failure.

Homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance index trajectories in HIV-infected patients treated with different first-line antiretroviral regimens.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the trajectories of the homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) index in a cohort of HIV-1 infected patients during their first-line antiretroviral (ART) regimen. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of naïve patients who started ART from 2007 at the Infectious Diseases Unit of the San Raffaele Hospital, Milan. We included patients treated with two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs, tenofovir, abacavir, lamivudine or emtricitabine), and one anchor drug (ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor [PI/r], non-NRTI [NNRTI], or integrase strand transfer inhibitor [InSTI]), and with HOMA-IR assessed both before and after the start of ART. Univariate and multivariate mixed linear models estimated HOMA-IR changes during ART. RESULTS: Among 618 patients included in the study, 218 received InSTI-, 210 PI/r-, and 190 NNRTI-based regimens. Median follow-up was 27.4 (16.3-41.2) months. Adjusted mean change in HOMA-IR index was significantly higher (P = .041) in patients treated with InSTI-based regimens [0.160 (95% CI: 0.003-0.321) units per year] compared with NNRTI-based regimens [-0.005 (95% CI: -0.184-0.074) units per year]; no difference was observed between patients treated with NNRTI- and PI/r-based regimens or between INSTI-based and PI/r-based regimens. CONCLUSION: InSTI-based first-line ARTs were independently associated with greater increases in HOMA-IR index.

Assessment of antiretroviral third agent virologic durability after initiation of first antiretroviral regimen.

Information on the virologic durability of modern antiretroviral regimens is important to clinicians. We aimed to describe virologic durability of first-line integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI)-, nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-, or protease inhibitor (PI)-based antiretroviral regimens. This was a retrospective study of antiretroviral-naïve patients that initiated first-line antiretroviral regimens with two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and an INSTI, NNRTI, or PI between January 2006 and June 2016. The outcome was time to virologic failure, which was assessed by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox regression models. There were 780 patients (median age = 37 years [interquartile range (IQR) = 30-45], 93.3% male, 56.2% Caucasian, median HIV duration = 1.8 years [IQR = 0.4-5.4], baseline log10 viral load [VL]=4.6 [IQR = 4.1-5.1], and baseline CD4+ cell count = 320 cells/µl [IQR = 217-440]). In total, 189/780 were on a third agent INSTI, 339/780 on a third agent NNRTI, and 252/780 on a third agent PI. Kaplan-Meier survival probability revealed longer time to virologic failure for INSTI, followed by NNRTI then PI (p < 0.001). Multivariable Cox regression revealed that being on an INSTI regimen (aHR = 0.27; 95%CI = 0.18-0.41) or NNRTI regimen (aHR = 0.64; 95%CI = 0.47-0.87) versus PI regimen, frequent VL testing (per year), (aHR = 0.64; 95%CI = 0.47-0.87), and duration of ART (aHR = 0.22; 95%CI = 0.17-0.30) (years) were inversely associated with time to virologic failure, and log10 of baseline VL (aHR = 1.94; 95%CI = 1.58-2.39 per log10) increased risk. Virologic failure was delayed and virologic durability prolonged for INSTI- compared to NNRTI- and PI-based regimens, supporting current antiretroviral therapy guidelines.

Tenofovir alafenamida en pacientes con diagnóstico de VIH / Tenofovir alafenamide in patients diagnosed with HIV

CONTEXTO CLÍNICO: En Argentina cada año se reportan aproximadamente 6.500 casos nuevos de infección por virus de inmunodeficiencia humana (VIH), lo que corresponde a una tasa de 13,3 cada 100.000 habitantes y una tasa de mortalidad en el año 2015 del 3,5 por 100.000 habitantes. Los objetivos del tratamiento antirretroviral (TARV) son retrasar la progresión de la enfermedad, restaurar y/o preservar la función del sistema inmunológico, la supresión de la replicación del VIH y prevenir la transmisión del virus. TECNOLOGÍA: Tenofovir alafenamida (TAF) es un inhibidor de la transcriptasa inversa análogo de nucleótidos (INTI) y un profármaco fosfonamidato de tenofovir (análogo de 2'-desoxiadenosina monofosfato). TAF ingresa pasivamente a la célula y, debido a su mayor estabilidad plasmática y activación intracelular mediante hidrólisis por la catepsina A, es más eficaz que tenofovir disoproxilo para concentrar tenofovir en las células mononucleares de sangre periférica, como linfocitos y otras células diana del VIH. OBJETIVO: El objetivo del presente informe es evaluar la evidencia disponible acerca de la eficacia, seguridad y aspectos relacionados a las políticas de cobertura del uso de tenofovir alafenamida en pacientes con diagnóstico de virus de inmunodeficiencia humano. MÉTODOS: Se realizó una búsqueda en las principales bases de datos bibliográficas, en buscadores genéricos de internet, y financiadores de salud. Se priorizó la inclusión de revisiones sistemáticas (RS), ensayos clínicos controlados aleatorizados (ECAs), evaluaciones de tecnologías sanitarias (ETS), evaluaciones económicas, guías de práctica clínica (GPC) y políticas de cobertura de diferentes sistemas de salud. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 2 metanálisis, 6 GPC, y 17 informes de políticas de cobertura de TAF en pacientes con diagnóstico de VIH. CONCLUSIONES: Evidencia de alta calidad muestra que tenofovir alafenamida (TAF) potenciado presenta similar tasa de supresión viral y resistencia genotípica al fumarato de disoproxilo de tenofovir (TDF), con una tendencia a presentar un mejor perfil de seguridad a nivel de la densidad mineral ósea y función renal en pacientes con diagnóstico de VIH sin tratamiento previo. Existe consenso entre las principales guías de práctica clínica y financiadores en recomendar la utilización de regímenes que contengan TAF en pacientes con un clearance de creatinina mayor a 30 ml/min sin tratamiento previo en combinación con otros agentes, siempre que el costo no supere el precio de las drogas de tratamiento antirretroviral habitualmente utilizadas. A diferencia de TAF, TDF debe ser utilizado en pacientes con un clearance de creatinina mayor a 50-60 ml/min. No se encontraron estudios de costo-efectividad o de impacto presupuestario en Latinoamérica. El precio de Genvoya© (elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine y tenofovir alafenamida) en Argentina es inferior a su comparador Stribild© (elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine y tenofovir disoproxil fumarato). Estas presentaciones permiten un régimen simplificado de tratamiento, lo que se traduce en una mayor adherencia terapéutica.

Dolutegravir for first-line antiretroviral therapy in low-income and middle-income countries: uncertainties and opportunities for implementation and research.

A new first-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimen containing dolutegravir is being rolled out in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). In studies from predominantly high-income settings, dolutegravir-based regimens had superior efficacy, tolerability, and durability compared with existing first-line regimens. However, several questions remain about the roll out of dolutegravir in LMICs, where most people with HIV are women of reproductive age, tuberculosis prevalence can be high, and access to viral load and HIV drug resistance testing is limited. Findings from cohort studies suggest that dolutegravir is safe when initiated in pregnancy, but more data are needed to determine the risk of adverse birth outcomes when dolutegravir-based regimens are initiated before conception. Increasing access to viral load testing to monitor the effectiveness of dolutegravir remains crucial, but the best strategy to manage patients with viraemia is unclear. Furthermore, evidence to support the effectiveness of dolutegravir when given with tuberculosis treatment is scarce, particularly in programmatic settings in LMICs. Lastly, whether nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor resistance will affect the long-term efficacy of dolutegravir-based regimens in first-line, and potentially second-line, ART is unknown. Clinical trials, cohorts, and surveillance of HIV drug resistance will be necessary to answer these questions and to maximise the benefits of this new regimen.

Quantifying the fitness cost of HIV-1 drug resistance mutations through phylodynamics.

Drug resistant HIV is a major threat to the long-term efficacy of antiretroviral treatment. Around 10% of ART-naïve patients in Europe are infected with drug-resistant HIV type 1. Hence it is important to understand the dynamics of transmitted drug resistance evolution. Thanks to routinely performed drug resistance tests, HIV sequence data is increasingly available and can be used to reconstruct the phylogenetic relationship among viral lineages. In this study we employ a phylodynamic approach to quantify the fitness costs of major resistance mutations in the Swiss HIV cohort. The viral phylogeny reflects the transmission tree, which we model using stochastic birth-death-sampling processes with two types: hosts infected by a sensitive or resistant strain. This allows quantification of fitness cost as the ratio between transmission rates of hosts infected by drug resistant strains and transmission rates of hosts infected by drug sensitive strains. The resistance mutations 41L, 67N, 70R, 184V, 210W, 215D, 215S and 219Q (nRTI-related) and 103N, 108I, 138A, 181C, 190A (NNRTI-related) in the reverse trancriptase and the 90M mutation in the protease gene are included in this study. Among the considered resistance mutations, only the 90M mutation in the protease gene was found to have significantly higher fitness than the drug sensitive strains. The following mutations associated with resistance to reverse transcriptase inhibitors were found to be less fit than the sensitive strains: 67N, 70R, 184V, 219Q. The highest posterior density intervals of the transmission ratios for the remaining resistance mutations included in this study all included 1, suggesting that these mutations do not have a significant effect on viral transmissibility within the Swiss HIV cohort. These patterns are consistent with alternative measures of the fitness cost of resistance mutations. Overall, we have developed and validated a novel phylodynamic approach to estimate the transmission fitness cost of drug resistance mutations.

Cost-utility analysis of the fixed-dose combination of dolutegravir/abacavir/lamivudine as initial treatment of HIV+ patients in Spain.

OBJECTIVE: Fixed-dose combinations of antiretroviral drugs have meant an important step forward in simplifying treatment and improving compliance and has led to an increased effectiveness of therapy, a viral load decrease and improving the quality of life of patients. The single-table formulation of dolutegravir with abacavir and lamivudine (DTG/ABC/3TC) is a highly efficacious and well-tolerated once-daily regimen for HIV-infected patients. The objective of the study was to assess the incremental cost-utility ratio of the fixed-dose combination of (DTG/ABC/3TC) versus the combinations emtricitabine/tenofovir/efavirenz (FTC/TDF/EFV), and darunavir/r (DRV/r) or raltegravir (RAL) with emtricitabine/tenofovir (FTC/TDF) or abacavir/lamivudine (ABC/3TC) as initial antiretroviral therapy in patients infected with HIV-1 from the perspective of the Spanish National Health System. METHOD: The ARAMIS model, which uses a microsimulation approach to simulate the individual changes in each patient from the start of treatment to death through a Markov chain of descriptive health states of the disease, was adapted to Spain. The alternatives used for comparison were the fixed-dose combination of emtricitabine/tenofovir/efavirenz (FTC/TDF/EFV), and the fixed- dose combinations of emtricitabine/tenofovir (FTC/TDF) or abacavir/lamivudine (ABC/3TC) with darunavir/r (DRV/r) or raltegravir (RAL). The probability of achieving virological suppression by the treatments included in the model was obtained from clinical trials SINGLE, SPRING-2 and FLAMINGO and the costs were expressed in € (2015). The model use the perspective of the Spanish National Health System, with a lifetime horizon and a discount rate of 3% was applied to cost and effectiveness. RESULTS: Treatment initiation with DTG/ABC/3TC was dominant when it was compared with treatment initiation with all the comparators: vs. FTC/TDF/EFV (-67 210.71€/QALY), vs. DRV/r + FTC/TDF or ABC/3TC (-1 787 341.44€/QALY), and vs. RAL + FTC/TDF or ABC/3TC (-1 005 117.13€/QALY). All the sensitivity analyses performed showed the consistency of these findings. CONCLUSIONS: With the premises considered, treatment initiation with DTG/ABC/3TC STR appears to be the most cost-effective option in ARTnaïve HIV infected patients from the Spanish Health System perspective.

Objetivo: Las combinaciones a dosis fijas de medicamentos antirretrovirales han significado un importante paso adelante en la simplificación del tratamiento y la mejora del cumplimiento, así como hacia una mayor eficacia de la terapia, una disminución de la carga viral y una mejora de la calidad de vida de los pacientes. La formulación de un comprimido único una vez al día con dosis fijas de dolutegravir, abacavir y lamivudina (DTG/ABC/3TC) para pacientes infectados con VIH es un régimen altamente eficaz y bien tolerado. El objetivo del estudio fue evaluar la relación coste- utilidad incremental de la combinación de dosis fija de (DTG/ABC/3TC) versus las combinaciones de emtricitabina/tenofovir/efavirenz (TDF/FTC/EFV) y darunavir/r (DRV/r) o raltegravir (RAL) con emtricitabina/tenofovir (FTC/TDF) o abacavir/lamivudina (ABC/3TC) como tratamiento antirretroviral inicial en pacientes infectados con VIH-1 desde la perspectiva del Sistema Nacional de Salud Español.Método: Se adaptó en España el modelo ARAMIS. Este utiliza un enfoque de microsimulación para emular los cambios individuales en cada paciente desde el inicio del tratamiento hasta su muerte mediante una cadena de Markov de estados de salud descriptivos de la enfermedad. Las alternativas empleadas para la comparación fueron la combinación de dosis fijas de emtricitabina/tenofovir/efavirenz (TDF/FTC/EFV) y las combinaciones de dosis fijas de emtricitabina/tenofovir (FTC/TDF) o abacavir/lamivudina (ABC/3TC) con darunavir/r (DRV/r) o raltegravir (RAL). La probabilidad de lograr la supresión virológica mediante los tratamientos incluidos en el modelo se ha obtenido de ensayos clínicos individuales, SPRING2 y FLAMINGO, y los costes fueron expresados en € (2015). El uso del modelo de la perspectiva del Sistema Nacional de Salud español, con un horizonte de vida útil y una tasa de descuento del 3% se, aplicó a coste y efectividad.Resultados: El inicio de tratamiento con DTG/ABC/3TC fue dominante cuando se comparó con el inicio del tratamiento con el resto de comparadores: frente a TDF/FTC/EFV (-67.210,710 € / AVAC) vs DRV/r FTC/TDF o ABC/3TC (-1,787,341.44 € / AVAC) y vs RAL FTC/TDF o ABC/3TC (-1,005,117.13 € / AVAC). Todos los análisis de sensibilidad realizados demostraron la consistencia de estos hallazgos.Conclusiones: Con las premisas consideradas, el inicio del tratamiento con la combinación a dosis fijas de DTG/ABC/3TC parece ser la opción más rentable para el tratamiento de pacientes infectados con el VIH desde la perspectiva del Sistema Nacional de Salud español.

Boosted protease inhibitor monotherapy versus boosted protease inhibitor plus lamivudine dual therapy as second-line maintenance treatment for HIV-1-infected patients in sub-Saharan Africa (ANRS12 286/MOBIDIP): a multicentre, randomised, parallel, open-label, superiority trial.

BACKGROUND: Despite satisfactory efficacy of WHO-recommended second-line antiretroviral treatment for patients with HIV in low-income countries, the need for simplified, low-cost, and less-toxic maintenance strategies remains high. We compared boosted protease inhibitor monotherapy with dual therapy with boosted protease inhibitor plus lamivudine in patients on second-line antiretrovial therapy (ART). METHODS: We did a multicentre, randomised, parallel, open-label, superiority, trial in the HIV services of five hospitals in sub-Saharan Africa (Yaoundé, Cameroon; Dakar, Senegal; and Bobo Dioulasso, Burkina Faso). We recruited patients from the long-term, post-trial cohort of the ANRS 12169/2LADY study that compared the efficacy of three second-line combinations based on boosted protease inhibitors. Participants for our study were HIV-1 infected with multiple mutations including M184V, at first-line failure, aged 18 years and older, on boosted protease inhibitor plus two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI) for at least 48 weeks with at least 48 weeks follow-up in the 2LADY trial, with two viral load measurements of less than 200 copies per mL in the previous 6 months, CD4 counts of more than 100 cells per µL, adherence of at least 90%, and no change to ART in the past 3 months. We randomly assigned participants (1:1) to receive either monotherapy with their boosted protease inhibitor (once-daily darunavir 800 mg [two 400 mg tablets] boosted with ritonavir 100 mg [one tablet] or coformulation of lopinavir 200 mg with ritonavir 50 mg [two tablets taken twice per day]) or to boosted protease inhibitor plus once-daily lamivudine 300 mg (one 300 mg tablet or two 150 mg tablets). Computer-generated randomisation was stratified by study site and viral load at screening (< 50 copies per mL, and 50-200 copies per mL), and concealed from study personnel throughout the inclusion period. After randomisation, treatment allocation was not masked from clinicians or patients]. Patients had follow-up visits at weeks 4 and 12, and every 3 months until 96 weeks; if viral load exceeded 500 copies per mL at any visit, NRTI (tenofovir and lamivudine) were reintroduced into treatment. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants who had treatment failure at 96 weeks in the intention-to-treat analysis, where treatment failure was defined as one of the following: a confirmed viral load of more than 500 copies per mL, reintroduction of NRTI, or interruption of boosted protease inhibitor. We designed the study to detect a difference of 12% between groups in the primary outcome, with an expected 20% of patients having treatment failure in the monotherapy group. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01905059. FINDINGS: Between March 5, 2014, and Jan 26, 2015, 265 participants were assigned to receive monotherapy (133) or boosted protease inhibitor plus lamivudine (132). At week 48, an independent data safety monitoring board reviewed data, and advised discontinuation of the monotherapy group because the number of failures had exceeded the expected 20%; therefore results here are for week 48. At this point, treatment failure occurred in four (3·0%; 95% CI 0·8-7·6) of 132 participants on dual therapy and 33 (24·8%; 17·7-33·0) of 133 participants on monotherapy (relative risk 8·2, 95% CI 3·0-22·5; odds ratio 10·6, 95% CI 3·6-42·1). The difference between groups (21·8%, 95% CI 13·9-29·7; p<0·0001) showed superiority of dual therapy compared with monotherapy. We recorded 46 severe adverse events of grade 3 or 4 (29 in the monotherapy group, 17 in the boosted protease inhibitor plus lamivudine group); one event in the montherapy group (intoxication resulting from co-administration of ritonavir-boosted lopinavir with an ergotamine derivate) was deemed related to study drug. Two participants in the monotherapy group and one in the dual therapy group died, all from causes not related to study drugs or procedures (one from complications from gastric cancer surgery, one in a work accident, and one from a lung disease of unknown cause). INTERPRETATION: After viral suppression with boosted protease inhibitor plus NRTI in second-line ART, maintenance therapy with boosted protease inhibitor plus lamivudine was associated with a high rate of success, despite the presence of M184V mutations at first-line treatment failure. Results indicated that boosted protease inhibitor monotherapy cannot be recommended for these patients. FUNDING: Agence National de Recherche sur le Sida et les hépatites and Janssen Pharmaceutica.

A spatio-temporal assessment of simian/human immunodeficiency virus (SHIV) evolution reveals a highly dynamic process within the host.

The process by which drug-resistant HIV-1 arises and spreads spatially within an infected individual is poorly understood. Studies have found variable results relating how HIV-1 in the blood differs from virus sampled in tissues, offering conflicting findings about whether HIV-1 throughout the body is homogeneously distributed. However, most of these studies sample only two compartments and few have data from multiple time points. To directly measure how drug resistance spreads within a host and to assess how spatial structure impacts its emergence, we examined serial sequences from four macaques infected with RT-SHIVmne027, a simian immunodeficiency virus encoding HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT), and treated with RT inhibitors. Both viral DNA and RNA (vDNA and vRNA) were isolated from the blood (including plasma and peripheral blood mononuclear cells), lymph nodes, gut, and vagina at a median of four time points and RT was characterized via single-genome sequencing. The resulting sequences reveal a dynamic system in which vRNA rapidly acquires drug resistance concomitantly across compartments through multiple independent mutations. Fast migration results in the same viral genotypes present across compartments, but not so fast as to equilibrate their frequencies immediately. The blood and lymph nodes were found to be compartmentalized rarely, while both the blood and lymph node were more frequently different from mucosal tissues. This study suggests that even oft-sampled blood does not fully capture the viral dynamics in other parts of the body, especially the gut where vRNA turnover was faster than the plasma and vDNA retained fewer wild-type viruses than other sampled compartments. Our findings of transient compartmentalization across multiple tissues may help explain the varied results of previous compartmentalization studies in HIV-1.

Tenofovir associado a entricitabina (TDF/FTC 300/200mg) como profilaxia pré-exposição (PrEP) para populações sob maior risco de adquirir o vírus da imunodeficiência humana (HIV) / Tenofovir associated with emtricitabine (TDF / FTC 300 / 200mg) as pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for populations at increased risk of acquiring human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)

CONTEXTO: A resposta brasileira à epidemia de aids é resultante de um longo processo de atuação do governo brasileiro que garante desde 1996 acesso universal ao tratamento antirretroviral. Contudo, apesar dos inúmeros avanços ocorridos na redução da morbimortalidade nos últimos anos, o número de novos casos de aids vem se mantendo praticamente inalterado. No Brasil, a epidemia de aids é concentrada em determinados segmentos populacionais, que apresentam uma maior prevalência de infecção pelo HIV, quando comparados à população em geral, e respondem pela maioria de casos novos da infecção. Assim, para essas populações sob maior risco de infecção pelo HIV faz-se necessário a construção de estratégias de prevenção focalizadas como forma de impactar a epidemia. TECNOLOGIA: Profilaxia pré-exposição (PrEP) oral, na forma de tenofovir associado a entricitabina (TDF/FTC 300/200mg). Consiste no uso de antirretrovirais previamente à exposição de risco. INDICAÇÃO: Redução de risco em adquirir a infecção pelo HIV, entre pessoas sob risco aumentado. PERGUNTA: O uso de tenofovir associado a entricitabina (TDF/FTC 300/200mg) quando comparado ao uso de placebo reduz o risco de infecção pelo HIV entre pessoas sob alto risco? EVIDÊNCIAS CIENTÍFICAS: As evidências científicas disponíveis demostram que o uso de PrEP reduz o risco de infecção pelo HIV, comparado a placebo, com eficácia >70% (RR=0,30, 95% IC: 0,21-0,45, p= 0,001). Sua eficácia está diretamente relacionada à adesão ao medicamento. Os eventos adversos foram similares entre o grupo placebo e o que usou PrEP. Casos de resistência aos medicamentos foram encontrados entre aqueles que iniciaram PrEP durante a fase aguda da infecção, mas a incidência de resistência durante o uso de PrEP foi baixa. Não foi encontrada associação entre uso de PrEP e mudanças no comportamento sexual. O uso de PrEP demonstrou segurança e eficácia, para a redução de risco em adquirir a infecção pelo HIV, entre pessoas sob risco aumentado, quando comparado ao uso de placebo. RECOMENDAÇÃO DA CONITEC: A CONITEC recomendou a incorporação da associação de tenofovir e entricitabina (TDF/FTC 300/200mg) como profilaxia pré-exposição (PrEP) para populações sob risco aumentado de infecção pelo HIV no SUS, condicionada à aprovação do registro na ANVISA para essa indicação e à apresentação de um plano de acompanhamento anual das pessoas que receberão a profilaxia, de forma que sua incorporação possa ser reavaliada dentro de um prazo de tempo de, no máximo, 2 anos. CONSULTA PÚBLICA: Por meio da Consulta Pública nº 05 foram recebidas 147 contribuições distribuídas entre os formulários destinados a experiência e opinião e os para contribuições técnico-científicas. O nível de concordância com a recomendação inicial favorável à incorporação do medicamento como profilaxia pré-exposição (prep) para populações sob risco aumentado de adquirir o vírus da imunodeficiência humana (HIV) no SUS foi alto, abrangendo quase a totalidade das contribuições técnico-científica e 77% das contribuições de experiência e opinião. Entre as discordantes ou parcialmente concordantes não foram identificadas contribuições que trouxessem evidências científicas novas às já incluídas nesse parecer técnico-científico ou contestações às evidências científicas identificadas e que embasam a proposta de incorporação do medicamento com finalidade profilática. A maioria das experiências profissionais relatadas convergem com a proposta de incorporação elaborada nesse parecer. RECOMENDAÇÃO FINAL: Deliberou-se por unanimidade recomendar a incorporação da associação de tenofovir e entricitabina (TDF/FTC 300/200mg) como profilaxia pré-exposição (prep) para populações sob risco aumentado de adquirir o vírus da imunodeficiência humana (HIV) no SUS, condicionada à aprovação da inclusão da indicação para profilaxia pré-exposição ao HIV no registro do medicamento pela ANVISA e reavaliação do plano de acompanhamento anual das pessoas que receberão a profilaxia, em até 2 anos. DECISÃO: Incorporar o tenofovir associado a entricitabina (TDF/FTC 300/200mg) como profilaxia pré-exposição (PrEP) para populações sob maior risco de adquirir o vírus da imunodeficiência humana (HIV), no âmbito do Sistema Único de Saúde ­ SUS, dada pela Portaria nº 21, publicada no DOU nº 101, do dia 29 de maio de 2017, seção 1, pág. 73.(AU)