Measuring Costs of Cardiovascular Disease Prevention for Patients with Familial Hypercholesterolemia in Administrative Claims Data.

INTRODUCTION: Familial hypercholesterolemia is a common genetic condition that significantly increases an individual's risk of cardiovascular events such as heart attack, stroke, and cardiac death and is a candidate for population-wide screening programs. Economic analyses of strategies to identify and treat familial hypercholesterolemia are limited by a lack of real-world cost estimates for screening services and medications for reducing cardiovascular risk in this population. METHODS: We estimated the cost of lipid panel testing in patients with hyperlipidemia and the cost of statins, ezetimibe, and PCKS9 inhibitors in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia from a commercial claims database and report costs and charges per panel and prescription by days' supply. RESULTS: The mean cost for a 90-day supply for statins was $183.33, 2.3 times the mean cost for a 30-day supply at $79.35. PCSK9 inhibitors generated the highest mean costs among medications used by patients with familial hypercholesterolemia. CONCLUSIONS: Lipid testing and lipid-lowering medications for cardiovascular disease prevention generate substantial real-world costs which can be used to improve cost-effectiveness models of familial hypercholesterolemia screening and care management.

Perceptions and Barriers on the Use of Proprotein Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 Inhibitors in Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia (From a Survey of Primary Care Physicians and Cardiologists).

Heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) results in significant elevations in LDL-C and premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Current guidelines recommend add-on proprotein subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor (PCSK9i) therapy for additional LDL-C lowering beyond statins. Data are sparse, however, regarding treatment patterns and barriers relating to PCSK9i in HeFH patients. We examined physician attitudes, use, and barriers for treatment in patients with HeFH. We surveyed 1,000 physicians (500 primary care providers [PCPs] and 500 cardiologists in the US regarding their preferred treatments, experience and barriers associated with using PCSK9is. Cardiologists compared to PCPs were more likely to rank a PCSK9i as most important for an HeFH patient needing additional LDL-C lowering (68.6% vs. 64.8%; p <0.05), as well as prescribing and having a patient on a PCSK9i. PCPs vs. cardiologists were less likely (odds ratio [OR] [95% confidence interval] = 0.46 [0.34-0.63]), private vs. academic practice more likely (OR = 1.53 [1.02-2.28]), and those who would prescribe a PCSK9i in an HeFH patient with (OR = 3.86 [2.57-5.78]) or without (OR = 1.96 [1.40-2.72]) ASCVD needing additional LDL-C reduction beyond a statin were more likely to actually prescribe a PCSK9i. Those practicing in an urban vs. rural setting were less likely (OR = 0.56 [0.34-0.93]), and those indicating they would prescribe a PCKS9i in an HeFH patient with (OR = 2.80 [1.74-4.49]) or without (OR = 1.43 [1.02-2.02]) ASCVD needing additional LDL-C lowering beyond a statin were more likely to face difficulty prescribing a PCSK9i (all p <0.05 to p <0.01). Greater physician education and assistance among both cardiologists and PCPs are needed to address the gaps in understanding and treatment regarding PCSK9is.

A Retrospective Chart Review Evaluating Efficacy, Tolerability, and Cost of Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 Inhibitors (PCSK9i) in Older Adults.

INTRODUCTION: Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors (PCSK9i) are proven to have profound lowering of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in patients with clinical atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease or familial hypercholesterolemia. AIM: The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate PCSK9i utilization in older adults, with a focus on efficacy outcomes within 6 months of initiation. Secondary outcomes included tolerability, out-of-pocket expenses (OPE), and barriers to initiation of therapy. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients ≥ 65 years prescribed PCSK9i therapy by a pharmacist-run lipid clinic within a cardiology practice. RESULTS: A total of 136 older adults were prescribed PCSK9i therapy for a Food and Drug Administration-approved indication between September 2015 and March 2019 with 98 patients included in the analyses. In terms of efficacy, 51 patients who took ≥ 3 doses of PCSK9i with baseline and follow-up lipid panels were assessed. On average, LDL-C reduced by 60% (169-67 mg/dL, p < 0.001). For tolerability, 15 patients reported treatment-emergent side effects, resulting in 10 therapy discontinuations. For the cost analysis, 72 patients reported anticipated OPE for 1 month of therapy. Ultimately 17 patients were approved for manufacturer patient assistance with $0 OPE and 31 patients utilized insurance coverage to obtain therapy reporting a median OPE of $9 United States Dollars ($0-$450). The main barrier to initiation was high OPE. CONCLUSIONS: PCSK9i are effective at lowering LDL-C in older adults. Tolerability was high among patients without a history of statin intolerance. PCSK9i remain high-cost medications to both insurance companies and patients in terms of cost-sharing responsibilities.

Use of Low-Density Lipoprotein-Lowering Therapies Before and After PCSK9 Inhibitor Initiation.

Background Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors (PCSK9i) are used to reduce low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol. PCSK9i use after initiation, as well as persistence with or alterations to other LDL-lowering therapy after PCSK9i initiation, is not well understood. Methods and Results We conducted a retrospective study of alirocumab or evolocumab (PCSK9i) new users from July 2015 to December 2017 in the MarketScan Early View database of US commercial insurance beneficiaries. We determined the prevalence of PCSK9i interruption (≥30-day gap in supply) and LDL-lowering therapy use in the year after PCSK9i initiation. The average age of 6151 patients initiating PCSK9i therapy was 63 years, 44.4% were women, and 76.8% had atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Overall, 52.2% (95% CI, 50.8%-53.7%) of patients had an interruption in PCSK9i therapy in the first year after treatment initiation and 62.5% remained on PCSK9i therapy at 1-year postinitiation. Also, 27.7% of patients were taking a statin at the time of PCSK9i initiation, with only 22.4% on statin therapy at 1 year after PCSK9i initiation. Ezetimibe use decreased from 20.9% at the time of PCSK9i initiation to 12.0% a year later. By 1 year after PCSK9i initiation, 44.0% of patients had experienced an interruption in all LDL-lowering therapies, and 26.6% were no longer on any LDL-lowering therapies. Conclusions After PCSK9i initiation, statins were often discontinued, whereas more than half of patients experienced an interruption in PCSK9i therapy. These results suggest that many new PCSK9i users may remain at high risk for cardiovascular events because of interruptions in LDL-lowering therapy.

Trends and Factors Associated With Insurer Approval of Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 Inhibitor Prescriptions.

OBJECTIVES: Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors (PCSK9is)-innovative yet costly cholesterol-lowering agents-have been subject to substantial prior authorization (PA) requirements and low approval rates. We aimed to investigate trends in insurer approval and reasons for rejection for PCSK9i prescriptions as well as associations between patients' demographic, clinical, pharmacy, payer, and PCSK9i-specific plan/coverage factors and approval. METHODS: We examined trends in PCSK9i approval rates and reasons for rejection using medical and prescription claims from 2015 to 2017 for individuals who received a PCSK9i prescription. We used multinomial logistic regression to estimate quarterly risk-adjusted approval rates for initial PCSK9i prescriptions and approval for any PCSK9i prescription within 30, 90, and 180 days of the initial PCSK9i prescription. For a 2016 subsample for whom we had PCSK9i-specific plan policy data, we examined factors associated with approval including PCSK9i-specific plan formulary coverage, step therapy requirements, and number of PA criteria. RESULTS: The main sample included 12 309 patients (mean age 64.8 years [SD = 10.8], 52.1% female, 51.5% receiving Medicare) and was similar in characteristics to the 2016 subsample (n = 6091). Approval rates varied across quarters but remained low (initial prescription, 13%-23%; within 90 days, 28%-44%). Over time, rejections owing to a lack of formulary coverage decreased and rejections owing to PA requirements increased. Lack of formulary coverage and having ≥11 PA criteria in the plan policy were associated with lower odds of PCSK9i prescription approval. CONCLUSIONS: These findings confirm ongoing PCSK9i access issues and offer a baseline for comparison in future studies examining the impact of recent efforts to improve PCSK9i access.

Comparative aspects of the care of familial hypercholesterolemia in the "Ten Countries Study".

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of information on the health care of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the health care of FH in countries of the Asia-Pacific region and Southern Hemisphere. METHODS: A series of questionnaires were completed by key opinion leaders from selected specialist centers in 12 countries concerning aspects of the care of FH, including screening, diagnosis, risk assessment, treatment, teaching/training, and research; the United Kingdom (UK) was used as the international benchmark. RESULTS: The estimated percentage of patients diagnosed with the condition was low (overall <3%) in all countries, compared with ∼15% in the UK. Underdetection of FH was associated with government expenditure on health care (Ï° = 0.667, P < .05). Opportunistic and systematic screening methods, and the Dutch Lipid Clinic Network criteria were most commonly used to detect FH; genetic testing was infrequently used. Noninvasive imaging of coronary calcium and/or carotid plaques was underutilized in risk assessment. Patients with FH were generally not adequately treated, with <30% of patients achieving guideline recommended low-density lipoprotein cholesterol targets on conventional therapies. Treatment gaps included suboptimal availability and use of lipoprotein apheresis and proprotein convertase subtilsin-kexin type 9 inhibitors. A deficit of FH registries, training programs, and publications were identified in less economically developed countries. The demonstration of cost-effectiveness for cascade screening, genetic testing, and specialized treatments were significantly associated with the availability of subsidies from the health care system (Ï° = 0.571-0.800, P < .05). CONCLUSION: We identified important gaps across the continuum of care for FH, particularly in less economically developed countries. Wider implementation of primary and pediatric care, telehealth services, patient support groups, education/training programs, research activities, and health technology assessments are needed to improve the care of patients with FH in these countries.

Application of PCSK9 Inhibitors in Practice.

PCSK9i (protein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors) are set to revolutionize the treatment of hypercholesterolemia in the management of atherosclerotic risk, but numerous reports have detailed unprecedented barriers to access for these drugs. To overcome these challenges, our group created a model to facilitate provision of this new therapy for patients who qualify according to Food and Drug Administration criteria. This report details the real-world follow-up experience of PCSK9i use in a large patient cohort structured to ensure rigor in data collection, analysis, and interpretation. The 271 patients approved and actively followed in our PCSK9i clinic between July 2015 and August 2018 represent a 97% approval rate from insurance, with 28% of prescriptions requiring at least one appeal. Over 50% of patients were statin intolerant. On average, there was a median lapse of 15 days between initial visit and insurance approval. PCSK9i therapy was affordable for most patients, with an average monthly out-of-pocket expense of $58.05 (median $0). Only 2.3% of patients were unable to initiate or continue therapy because of cost. Reductions from baseline in LDL (low-density lipoprotein) cholesterol and Lp(a) (lipoprotein [a])were comparable to published reports with median reductions of 60% and 23% at 1 year, respectively. PCSK9i therapy was well-tolerated overall, though 9% of patients reported adverse events, and 5% of patients discontinued due mostly to musculoskeletal and flu-like symptoms. Our practice model demonstrates that PCSK9i therapy can be accessed easily and affordably for the majority of eligible patients, resulting in dramatic improvement in lipid profile results. Moreover, our registry data suggest that results from the prospective clinical trials of PCSK9i on LDL and Lp(a) reduction and on tolerability are applicable to a real-world cohort.

Lipid-lowering therapy with PCSK9-inhibitors in the real-world setting: Two-year experience of a regional lipid clinic.

AIM: PCSK9 inhibitors (PCSK9i) effectively lower cholesterol levels in randomized trials with reduction in cardiovascular outcomes and favorable safety profile. However, the access to PCSK9i is limited due to high cost and data regarding the use of PCSK9i in real-world practice is limited. METHODS: Data on all patients submitted for approval of PCSK9i at a regional lipid clinic, outside of clinical trials. Patients' profile, approval rates, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reduction rates, and adverse events were evaluated. RESULTS: Recommendation for PCSK9i was given to 133 patients; 16 did not receive insurance approval and additional 16 were approved but did not initiate therapy. Of the 101 treated patients (47% females; mean age 61 ± 11 years), 52 had probable/definite familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) (peak LDL-C level 305 ± 87 mg/dL vs non-FH 204 ± 39 mg/dL) and 62% had an established cardiovascular disease. Statin intolerance was reported by 77%. Follow-up lipid panel was available in 66/101 patients: mean LDL-C reduction was 59% ± 19. Subjects with heterozygous FH had similar LDL-C decrease than those with non-FH (59% ± 22 vs 60% ± 14, P = .792). LDL-C < 100 mg/dL was achieved by 76%, LDL-C < 70 mg/dL by 58% and LDL-C < 40 mg/dL by 18% of those with follow-up data. Side effects were reported by 10%, mainly musculoskeletal complaints and flu-like symptoms, and 15% have discontinued treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Patient selection by a regional lipid clinic resulted in a high real-world PCSK9i insurance approval, with efficacy and safety comparable to randomized clinical trials. Cost and medication nonadherence are potential barriers to successful implementation of therapy in routine clinical care.

Variation in Lipid-Lowering Therapy Use in Patients With Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol ≥190 mg/dL: Insights From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry-Practice Innovation and Clinical Excellence Registry.

BACKGROUND: Patients with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) ≥190 mg/dL are at high risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease events. Treatment guidelines recommend intensive treatment in these patients. Variation in the use of lipid-lowering therapies (LLTs) in these patients in a national sample of cardiology practices is not known. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using data from the American College of Cardiology National Cardiovascular Data Registry-Practice Innovation and Clinical Excellence registry, we assessed the proportion of patients with LDL-C ≥190 mg/dL (n=49 447) receiving statin, high-intensity statin, LLT associated with ≥50% LDL-C lowering, ezetimibe, or a PCSK9 (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9) inhibitor between January 2013 and December 2016. We assessed practice-level rates and variation in LLT use using median rate ratio (MRR) adjusted for patient and practice characteristics. MRRs represent the likelihood that 2 random practices would differ in treatment of identical patients with LDL-C ≥190 mg/dL. The proportion of patients receiving a statin, high-intensity statin, LLT associated with ≥50% LDL-C reduction, ezetimibe, or PCSK9 inhibitor were 58.5%, 31.9%, 34.6%, 8.5%, and 1.5%, respectively. Median practice-level rates and adjusted MRR for statin (56% [interquartile range, 47.3%-64.8%]; MRR, 1.20 [95% confidence interval [CI], 1.17-1.23]), high-intensity statin (30.2% [interquartile range, 12.1%-41.1%]; MRR, 2.31 [95% CI, 2.12-2.51]), LLT with ≥50% LDL-C lowering (31.8% [interquartile range, 15.3%-45.5%]; MRR, 2.12 [95% CI, 1.95-2.28]), ezetimibe (5.8% [interquartile range, 2.8%-9.8%]; MRR, 2.42 [95% CI, 2.21-2.63]), and PCSK9 inhibitors (0.16% [interquartile range, 0%-1.9%]; MRR, 2.38 [95% CI, 2.04-2.72]) indicated significant gaps and >200% variation in receipt of several of these medications for patients across practices. Among those without concomitant atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, even larger treatment gaps were noted (proportion of patients on a statin, high-intensity statin, LLT with ≥50% LDL-C reduction, ezetimibe, or PCSK9 inhibitor were 50.8%, 25.25%, 26.8%, 4.9%, and 0.74%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Evidence-based LLT use remains low among patients with elevated LDL-C with significant variation in care. System-level interventions are needed to address these gaps and reduce variation in care of these high-risk patients.

Assessment of the 1% of Patients with Consistent < 15% Reduction in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol: Pooled Analysis of 10 Phase 3 ODYSSEY Alirocumab Trials.

PURPOSE: Clinical trials of statins and other lipid-lowering therapies (LLTs) often report large inter-individual variations in their effects on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). We evaluated apparent hyporesponsiveness to the proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor alirocumab (defined as < 15% LDL-C reduction from baseline at all timepoints) using data from 10 Phase 3 trials (3120 hypercholesterolemic patients). METHODS: This report assessed the LDL-C percent reduction from baseline at weeks 4-104 (depending on study), and alirocumab serum levels and antidrug antibodies, in patients with apparent hyporesponsiveness. RESULTS: Among the 3120 patients evaluated, 98.9% responded to alirocumab, and 33 (1.1%) had < 15% LDL C reduction at all measured timepoints. Pharmacokinetics data indicated that 13/33 apparent hyporesponders had not received alirocumab; no pharmacokinetics data were available for 14/33, and 6/33 had detectable alirocumab. For the six patients with confirmed alirocumab receipt, the degree of adherence to pre-study concurrent LLTs could not be determined after study start; one of these patients had persistent antidrug antibodies. CONCLUSIONS: Apparent hyporesponsiveness to alirocumab appeared to be due to lack of receipt of alirocumab determined by serum alirocumab levels, possible lack of adherence to concurrent LLTs, a theoretical and rare possibility of biological non-responsiveness due to persistent antidrug antibodies, or other causes, as yet unidentified.

PCSK9 inhibitor valuation: A science-based review of the two recent models.

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) has been extensively evaluated. Prospective cohort studies, randomized controlled trials, biology, pathophysiology, genetics, and Mendelian randomization studies, have clearly taught us that LDL-C causes atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. The newest class of drugs to lower LDL-C, the proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) monoclonal antibodies, have been found to safely reduce LDL-C approximately 60% when added to high-intensity statin therapy. Because their cost is much greater than that of the currently available agents, their value has been questioned. In late August, 2017, two groups assessed the value of this class of drugs looking at cost-effectiveness; however, the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review and Fonarow and colleagues found disparate results when assessing PCSK9 valuation. Herein, we review the evolution of LDL-C from hypothesis to fact, and then attempt to adjudicate the 2 models, shedding light on the complex modeling process. We find that models of cost-effectiveness are helpful adjuncts to decision making, but that their conclusions depend on many assumptions. Ultimately, clinician judgment regarding their clinical benefit, balanced by some estimation of cost, may be more productive to target the right patients for whom the benefits can be well-justified.

Prior Authorization Requirements for Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 Inhibitors Across US Private and Public Payers.

BACKGROUND: Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors (PCSK9is) are an innovative treatment option for patients with familial hypercholesterolemia or clinical atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease who require further lowering of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. However, the high costs of these agents have spurred payers to implement utilization management policies to ensure appropriate use. We examined prior authorization (PA) requirements for PCSK9is across private and public US payers. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted an analysis of 2016 formulary coverage and PA data from a large, proprietary database with information on policies governing >95% of Americans with prescription drug coverage (275.3 million lives) within 3872 plans across the 4 major insurance segments (commercial, health insurance exchange, Medicare, and Medicaid). The key measures included administrative PA criteria (prescriber specialty, number of criteria in PA policy or number of fields on PA form, requirements for medical record submission, reauthorization requirements) and clinical/diagnostic PA criteria (approved conditions, required laboratories or other tests, required concomitant therapy, step therapy requirements, continuation criteria) for each of 2 Food and Drug Administration-approved PCSK9is. Select measures (eg, number of PA criteria/fields, medical record submission requirements) were obtained for 2 comparator cardiometabolic drugs (ezetimibe and liraglutide). Between 82% and 97% of individuals were enrolled in plans implementing PA for PCSK9is (depending on insurance segment), and one third to two thirds of these enrollees faced PAs restricting PCSK9i prescribing to a specialist. For patients with familial hypercholesterolemia, diagnostic confirmation via genetic testing or meeting minimum clinical scores/criteria was also required. PA requirements were more extensive for PCSK9is as compared with the other cardiometabolic drugs (ie, contained 3×-11× the number of PA criteria or fields on PA forms and more frequently involved the submission of medical records as supporting documentation). CONCLUSIONS: PA requirements for PCSK9is are greater than for selected other drugs within the cardiometabolic disease area, raising concerns about whether payer policies to discourage inappropriate use may also be restricting access to these drugs in patients who need them.

Rectal indomethacin or intravenous gabexate mesylate as prophylaxis for acute pancreatitis post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the results in our case series of AP ERCP over the last three years. The prophylaxis for acute pancreatitis (AP) post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) consists of rectal indomethacin, but some studies are not concordant. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We compared 241 ERCP performed from January 2014 to February 2015 with intravenous gabexate mesylate (Group A), with the 387 ERCP performed from March 2015 to December 2016 with rectal indomethacin (Group B) as prophylaxis for AP post-ERCP. RESULTS: There were 8 (3.31%) AP post-ERCP in Group A vs. 4 (1.03%) in Group B. CONCLUSIONS: Rectal indomethacin shows a better statistically significant performance than intravenous gabexate mesylate in the prophylaxis of AP post-ERCP, besides being cheaper.

Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 Inhibitor Therapy: Payer Approvals and Rejections, and Patient Characteristics for Successful Prescribing.

BACKGROUND: Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors (PCSK9i) are a novel class of medications for patients with familial hypercholesterolemia or clinical atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease requiring additional lipid lowering beyond dietary measures and statin use. Because of the drugs' high cost, rates of prescription approval by payers may be low. We aimed to identify payer approval and rejection rates for PCSK9i prescriptions and the potential factors influencing these rates. METHODS: This is a retrospective, descriptive cohort study using nationwide pharmacy claims linked to electronic medical records from a nationwide data warehouse. The data set includes >220 million patients from all 50 states and all payer types with 5140 distinct health plans. PCSK9i prescriptions were submitted for 51 466 patients in the pharmacy data set. The main outcome was approval or rejection of PCSK9i prescription claims. Factors associated with approval and rejection of these medications in the United States were assessed. RESULTS: Among patients who were prescribed a PCSK9i, 47.0% were approved for coverage by the payer. Variables that were associated with PCSK9i approval included age >65 years (P<0.01), history of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (P<0.01), prescription by a cardiologist or nonprimary care provider (P<0.01), statin intolerance (P=0.03), longer statin duration (P=0.01), and noncommercial payers (P<0.01). Higher low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were not associated with higher approval rates. Commercial third-party payers had the lowest approval rates (24.4%) and Medicare had the highest (60.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Rates of approval for PCSK9i therapy are low, even for patients who appear to meet labeled indications. Although a combination of clinical characteristics increases the likelihood of approval, payer type is the most significant factor.

Eligibility for alirocumab or evolocumab treatment in 1090 hypercholesterolemic patients referred to a regional cholesterol treatment center with LDL cholesterol ≥70 mg/dL despite maximal-tolerated LDL-cholesterol-lowering therapy.

BACKGROUND: Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors, Praluent (alirocumab [ALI]) and Repatha (evolocumab [EVO]) have been approved as adjuncts to the standard-of-care maximal-tolerated dose (MTD) of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLC)-lowering therapy (LLT), statin therapy, in heterozygous (HeFH) (ALI or EVO) or homozygous (EVO) familial hypercholesterolemia, or clinical atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD) where LDLC lowering is insufficient (both). Since LDLC lowering has been revolutionized by ALI and EVO, specialty pharmaceutical pricing models will be applied to a mass market. METHODS: We applied US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and insurance eligibility criteria for ALI and EVO to 1090 hypercholesterolemic patients serially referred over 3 years who then received ≥2 months maximal-tolerated dose of standard-of-care LDL cholesterol-lowering therapy (MTDLLT) with follow-up LDLC ≥70 mg/dL. MTDLLT did not include ALI or EVO, which had not been commercially approved before completion of this study. RESULTS: Of the 1090 patients, 140 (13%) had HeFH by clinical diagnostic criteria and/or CVD with LDLC >100 mg/dL despite ≥2 months on MTDLLT, meeting FDA insurance criteria for ALI or EVO therapy. Another 51 (5%) patients were statin intolerant, without HeFH or CVD. CONCLUSION: If 13% of patients with HeFH-CVD and LDLC >100 mg/dL despite MTDLLT are eligible for ALI or EVO, then specialty pharmaceutical pricing models (~$14,300/year) might be used in an estimated 10 million HeFH-CVD patients. Whether the health care savings arising from the anticipated reduction of CVD events by ALI or EVO justify their costs in populations with HeFH-CVD and LDLC >100 mg/dL despite MTDLLT remains to be determined.

Therapeutics: Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Augmentation Therapy.

Subjects with alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency who develop pulmonary disease are managed following general treatment guidelines, including disease management interventions. In addition, administration of intravenous infusions of alpha-1 proteinase inhibitor (augmentation therapy) at regular schedules is a specific therapy for individuals with AATD with pulmonary involvement.This chapter summarizes the manufacturing differences of commercially available formulations and the available evidence of the effects of augmentation therapy. Biologically, there is clear evidence of in vivo local antiprotease effects in the lung and systemic immunomodulatory effects. Clinically, there is cumulative evidence of slowing lung function decline and emphysema progression. The optimal dose of augmentation therapy is being revised as well as more individualized assessment of who needs this therapy.