RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Recently, the results of two economic evaluations were published both of which seemingly demonstrate the cost-effectiveness of sofosbuvir-based regimens for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C genotype 1 infection in Germany. Both analyses were sponsored by the manufacturer of sofosbuvir and use a different methodology: Whereas one evaluation is based on a conventional cost-utility analysis, the other rests upon the efficiency-frontier method used by the German Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG). The purpose of this study is to reanalysis the results of both economic evaluations in combination. DESIGN: Reanalysis of published decision modelling results. SETTING: Primary care in Germany. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with chronic hepatitis C genotype 1 infection (treatment-naïve and -experienced, cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic). INTERVENTIONS: Sofosbuvir, other anti-hepatitis C virus drugs, and no treatment. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Cost per unit of health benefit and cost per quality-adjusted life year. RESULTS: Reanalysis of the results of both economic evaluations in combination reveals an unclear rationale for choosing the selected cost-effectiveness methods as well as a potential publication bias, favoring the product of the manufacturer. Based on the reanalysis, sofosbuvir is not cost-effective in treatment-experienced non-cirrhotic patients, potentially lacks cost-effectiveness in treatment-experienced cirrhotic patients, and is only partially cost-effective in treatment-naïve non-cirrhotic patients. Taken together, these results indicate a lack of cost-effectiveness in three quarters of the German patient population. CONCLUSIONS: Two economic evaluations on sofosbuvir suggest, in combination, that sofosbuvir cannot be considered a cost-effective treatment in three quarters of the German patient population.
Assuntos
Antivirais/economia , Hepacivirus/genética , Hepatite C Crônica/economia , Sofosbuvir/economia , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Genótipo , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Hepacivirus/efeitos dos fármacos , Hepatite C Crônica/epidemiologia , Hepatite C Crônica/virologia , Humanos , Interferon-alfa/economia , Interferon-alfa/uso terapêutico , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Ribavirina/economia , Ribavirina/uso terapêutico , Sofosbuvir/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Novel oral regimes have been approved for treating hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in adolescents due to their superior effectiveness and safety. However, its economic outcome is still unclear in this population. The current analysis investigates the cost-effectiveness of novel oral regimens compared with that of pegylated interferon α with ribavirin (PR) therapies in adolescents in the context of the United States and China. METHODS: A Markov model was developed to measure the economic and health outcomes of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LS) for genotypes 1 and 4, sofosbuvir/ribavirin (SR) for genotype 2, and ledipasvir/sofosbuvir/ribavirin (LSR) for genotype 3 HCV infection compared with the outcomes of PR treatment. Clinical costs and utility inputs were gathered from published sources. Lifetime discounted quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were measured. The uncertainty was facilitated by 1-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: In the United States, the ICERs of LS strategy were $14,699 and $14,946/QALY for genotypes 1 and 4 HCV infection, respectively; the ICER of SR strategy for genotype 2 was $42,472/QALY; and the ICER of LSR for genotype 3 was $49,409/QALY in comparison with the PR strategy. In Chinese adolescents, LS for genotypes 1 and 4, SR for genotype 2, and LSR for genotype 3 were the dominant alternatives to the PR strategy. The results were robust to sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Novel oral regimes for adolescents with HCV infection are likely to be cost-effective in the context of the United States and China.
Assuntos
Antivirais/economia , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Análise Custo-Benefício , Quimioterapia Combinada/economia , Hepatite C Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Administração Oral , Adolescente , Benzimidazóis/economia , Benzimidazóis/uso terapêutico , Criança , China , Fluorenos/economia , Fluorenos/uso terapêutico , Genótipo , Hepacivirus/efeitos dos fármacos , Hepacivirus/genética , Humanos , Interferon-alfa/economia , Interferon-alfa/uso terapêutico , Cadeias de Markov , Polietilenoglicóis/economia , Polietilenoglicóis/uso terapêutico , Proteínas Recombinantes/economia , Proteínas Recombinantes/uso terapêutico , Ribavirina/economia , Ribavirina/uso terapêutico , Sofosbuvir/economia , Sofosbuvir/uso terapêutico , Estados UnidosAssuntos
Fibrose/epidemiologia , Hepatite B/epidemiologia , Hepatite D/epidemiologia , Vírus Delta da Hepatite/isolamento & purificação , Hepatopatias/virologia , Adulto , Doença Crônica , Feminino , Fibrose/mortalidade , Carga Global da Doença , Antígenos de Superfície da Hepatite B/imunologia , Vírus da Hepatite B/isolamento & purificação , Hepatite D/complicações , Hepatite D/tratamento farmacológico , Hepatite D/mortalidade , Vírus Delta da Hepatite/imunologia , Humanos , Incidência , Interferon-alfa/economia , Interferon-alfa/uso terapêutico , Lipopeptídeos/uso terapêutico , Hepatopatias/epidemiologia , Hepatopatias/imunologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Piperidinas/uso terapêutico , Prevalência , Piridinas/uso terapêutico , Fatores de Risco , Superinfecção/complicações , Uzbequistão/epidemiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Because of the lack of evidence regarding long-term effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of first-generation direct-acting antivirals for chronic hepatitis C (CHC) treatment in Brazil, we performed a cost-utility analysis comparing standard dual therapy (peginterferon plus ribavirin [pegIFN/RBV]), boceprevir, and telaprevir for CHC patients. METHODS: We developed a state-transition Markov model simulating the progression of CHC. Long-term outcomes included remaining life expectancy in life-years (LYs), quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Short-term outcomes included sustained virological response rates (SVR). Direct medical costs were obtained from Brazilian databases. A lifelong time horizon was considered and a 5% annual discount rate was applied for costs and clinical outcomes. A willingness-to-pay threshold of approximately $20 000 per QALY was used. We performed multiple sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: For short- and long-term scenarios, therapy with boceprevir was dominated by telaprevir, which was more effective than standard dual therapy (75.0% vs 40.4% SVR rate, 13.47 vs 12.59 LYs, and 9.74 vs 8.49 QALYs, respectively) and was also more expensive ($15 742 vs $5413). The corresponding ICERs were $29 854/SVR, $11 803/LY, and $8277/QALY. Based on our model, triple therapy with telaprevir was the most cost-effective treatment for the Brazilian health system. Despite a lack of data regarding the Brazilian population, we incorporated as many applicable parameters as possible. CONCLUSIONS: Telaprevir is more effective and cost-effective than boceprevir. Our model may be applied for other settings with a few adjustments in the input parameters.
Assuntos
Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Hepatite C Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Oligopeptídeos/uso terapêutico , Prolina/análogos & derivados , Antivirais/administração & dosagem , Antivirais/efeitos adversos , Brasil , Análise Custo-Benefício , Custos de Medicamentos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hepatite C Crônica/economia , Humanos , Interferon-alfa/administração & dosagem , Interferon-alfa/economia , Interferon-alfa/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Cadeias de Markov , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Oligopeptídeos/administração & dosagem , Oligopeptídeos/economia , Prolina/administração & dosagem , Prolina/economia , Prolina/uso terapêutico , Prática de Saúde Pública/economia , Prática de Saúde Pública/estatística & dados numéricos , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Ribavirina/administração & dosagem , Ribavirina/economia , Ribavirina/uso terapêutico , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of sunitinib versus interferon-alfa for the treatment of advanced and/or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in Singapore. METHODS: A partitioned survival model with three health states (progression-free, progressive disease, and death) was developed from a healthcare payer perspective over a 10-year time horizon. Survival curves from the pivotal trial of sunitinib versus interferon-alfa were extrapolated beyond the trial period to estimate the underlying progression-free survival and overall survival parametric distributions. Health state utilities were derived from the literature and direct costs were sourced from local public healthcare institutions. The sunitinib dose in the model reflected local prescribing practices whereby a combination of 50 mg (28 percent) and 37.5 mg (72 percent) strengths are used. RESULTS: The base-case analysis comparing sunitinib versus interferon-alfa resulted in an incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) of SGD191,061 (USD139,757) per quality-adjusted life-year gained. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the ICER was most sensitive to variations in the utility value assumed for the progression-free health state and the price of sunitinib. CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of any price reduction, sunitinib had an exceedingly high ICER and was not considered a cost-effective use of healthcare resources in Singapore's context for the first-line treatment of advanced RCC. The findings from our evaluation will be useful to inform local healthcare decision making and resource allocations for tyrosine kinase inhibitors when appraised alongside comparative clinical effectiveness data and payer affordability considerations.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma de Células Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Interferon-alfa/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Sunitinibe/uso terapêutico , Antineoplásicos/economia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/economia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma de Células Renais/mortalidade , Carcinoma de Células Renais/patologia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Gastos em Saúde , Recursos em Saúde/economia , Recursos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Interferon-alfa/economia , Neoplasias Renais/mortalidade , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Cadeias de Markov , Modelos Econométricos , Metástase Neoplásica , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Singapura , Sunitinibe/economia , Análise de SobrevidaRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIM: For genotype 2 chronic hepatitis C (CHC), the efficacy and safety of sofosbuvir plus ribavirin therapy (SOF + RBV) was better than pegylated interferon plus ribavirin therapy (PR) at a greater drug cost. This study investigated the cost-effectiveness of SOF + RBV compared with PR for treatment-naïve genotype 2 CHC in South Korea. METHODS: Using a decision analytic Markov model, a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing SOF + RBV with PR or no treatment for treatment-naïve genotype 2 CHC was performed with probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity analyses from the payer's perspective in 2017. Three cohorts of patients aged 40-49, 50-59, and 60-69 years were simulated to progress through the fibrosis stages F0-F4 to end-stage liver disease, hepatocellular carcinoma, or death. Published and calculated data on the clinical efficacy of the regimen, health-related quality of life, costs, and transition probabilities were used. RESULTS: While the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for PR was dominant over no treatment, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for SOF + RBV were $20 058 for the patients in their 40s, $19 662 for those in their 50s, and $22 278 for those in their 60s compared with PR. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated an 89.0% probability for the SOF + RBV to be cost-effective at a willingness to pay of $29 754.4 (per-capita gross domestic product in 2017) for the patients in their 40s and 94.1% and 89.1% for the patients in their 50s and 60s, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The SOF + RBV is a cost-effective option for genotype 2 treatment-naïve CHC patients, especially for the patients with liver cirrhosis in Korea.
Assuntos
Antivirais/administração & dosagem , Antivirais/economia , Genótipo , Hepacivirus/genética , Hepatite C Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Hepatite C Crônica/virologia , Ribavirina/administração & dosagem , Ribavirina/economia , Sofosbuvir/administração & dosagem , Sofosbuvir/economia , Idoso , Análise Custo-Benefício , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Hepatite C Crônica/economia , Humanos , Interferon-alfa/administração & dosagem , Interferon-alfa/economia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Polietilenoglicóis/administração & dosagem , Polietilenoglicóis/economia , Proteínas Recombinantes/administração & dosagem , Proteínas Recombinantes/economia , República da Coreia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The global market for protein drugs has the highest compound annual growth rate of any pharmaceutical class but their availability, especially outside of the US market, is compromised by the high cost of manufacture and validation compared to traditional chemical drugs. Improvements in transgenic technologies allow valuable proteins to be produced by genetically-modified animals; several therapeutic proteins from such animal bioreactors are already on the market after successful clinical trials and regulatory approval. Chickens have lagged behind mammals in bioreactor development, despite a number of potential advantages, due to the historic difficulty in producing transgenic birds, but the production of therapeutic proteins in egg white of transgenic chickens would substantially lower costs across the entire production cycle compared to traditional cell culture-based production systems. This could lead to more affordable treatments and wider markets, including in developing countries and for animal health applications. RESULTS: Here we report the efficient generation of new transgenic chicken lines to optimize protein production in eggs. As proof-of-concept, we describe the expression, purification and functional characterization of three pharmaceutical proteins, the human cytokine interferon α2a and two species-specific Fc fusions of the cytokine CSF1. CONCLUSION: Our work optimizes and validates a transgenic chicken system for the cost-effective production of pure, high quality, biologically active protein for therapeutics and other applications.
Assuntos
Animais Geneticamente Modificados/genética , Biotecnologia/métodos , Galinhas/genética , Citocinas/genética , Animais , Animais Geneticamente Modificados/metabolismo , Reatores Biológicos/economia , Biotecnologia/economia , Galinhas/metabolismo , Citocinas/economia , Citocinas/metabolismo , Humanos , Interferon-alfa/economia , Interferon-alfa/genética , Interferon-alfa/metabolismo , Fator Estimulador de Colônias de Macrófagos/economia , Fator Estimulador de Colônias de Macrófagos/genética , Fator Estimulador de Colônias de Macrófagos/metabolismo , Proteínas Recombinantes/economia , Proteínas Recombinantes/genética , Proteínas Recombinantes/metabolismoRESUMO
Sunitinib has been shown to offer clinical benefits during the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma. However, molecular targeting drugs are expensive and can have a significant impact on medical expenses. The purpose of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of sunitinib as a first-line therapy compared with interferon-alpha (IFN-α) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients. A Markov model was used to show the clinical courses of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who received sunitinib or IFN-α. The transition probabilities and utilities employed in this Markov model were derived from two sources. This study focused on the perspective of public healthcare payer, as only direct medical costs were estimated from the treatment schedule for metastatic renal cell cancer. In the cost-effectiveness analysis, outcomes were valued in terms of life years (LYs) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). We calculated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) during the cost-effectiveness analysis. The results were tested using Monte Carlo simulations. Sunitinib and IFN-α treatment resulted in LYs of 2.40 years and 2.03 years, QALYs of 1.58 and 1.25, and expected costs of 13,572,629 yen and 6,083,002 yen, respectively. As a result, the ICER associated with replacing IFN-α with sunitinib was 22,695,839 yen/QALYs. Our results suggest that compared with IFN-α, sunitinib prolongs LYs and QALYs, but the increases in quality achieved by sunitinib are more expensive than those produced by IFN-α.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma de Células Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Análise Custo-Benefício , Indóis/economia , Indóis/uso terapêutico , Interferon-alfa/economia , Interferon-alfa/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Pirróis/economia , Pirróis/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Japão , Cadeias de Markov , Terapia de Alvo Molecular , Método de Monte Carlo , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , SunitinibeRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this systematic review was to conduct a comprehensive assessment of economic evaluations of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in middle- and high-income countries. METHODS: A literature search was conducted in Embase, MEDLINE (via PubMed) and the Cochrane library on March 3, 2018 to identify economic evaluations of chronic myeloid leukemia that met the inclusion criteria. Data on such parameters as patient characteristics, cost components, and main outcomes were extracted from eligible studies. RESULTS: The literature review retrieved 798 studies, 17 of which fulfilled the eligibility criteria. Eight studies included an economic analysis on newly diagnosed patients with CML. Seven studies investigated people with CML who were resistant or intolerant to standard-dose imatinib. One article focused on chronic phase (CP)-CML patients who experienced failure with first-line treatment for interferon-α. The last study investigated advanced stages of CML patients. Most studies (n = 70.6%) were conducted in high-income countries. Only five studies (n = 29.4%) were performed in middle-income countries. Most studies used a Markov model. The time horizon varied from six months to life-time. CONCLUSIONS: Despite high costs, the included studies indicate that imatinib regimens are cost effective in newly diagnosed patients with CP-CML. For people with CML who are resistant or intolerant to standard-dose imatinib, dasatinib is likely to be a more cost-effective strategy in middle-income countries. More studies are necessary to assess the long-term efficacy and cost effectiveness of novel treatment options.
Assuntos
Países Desenvolvidos/economia , Leucemia Mielogênica Crônica BCR-ABL Positiva/economia , Leucemia Mielogênica Crônica BCR-ABL Positiva/epidemiologia , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Dasatinibe/economia , Dasatinibe/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Mesilato de Imatinib/economia , Mesilato de Imatinib/uso terapêutico , Renda , Interferon-alfa/economia , Interferon-alfa/uso terapêutico , Leucemia Mielogênica Crônica BCR-ABL Positiva/tratamento farmacológico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/uso terapêutico , Qualidade de Vida , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de VidaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C is the second fastest growing infectious disease in China. The standard-of-care for chronic hepatitis C in China is Pegylated interferon plus ribavirin (PR), which is associated with tolerability and efficacy issues. An interferon- and ribavirin-free, all-oral regimen comprising daclatasvir (DCV) and asunaprevir (ASV), which displays higher efficacy and tolerability, has recently been approved in China. OBJECTIVES: This study is to estimate the cost-effectiveness of DCV+ASV (24 weeks) for chronic hepatitis C genotype 1b treatment-naïve patients compared with PR regimen (48 weeks) in China. METHODS: A cohort-based Markov model was developed from Chinese payer perspective to project the lifetime outcomes of treating 10,000 patients with an average age of 44.5 with two hypothetical regimens, DCV+ASV and PR. Chinese-specific health state costs and efficacy data were used. The annual discount rate was 5%. Base-case analysis and sensitivity analysis were conducted. RESULTS: For HCV Genotype 1b treatment-naïve patients, DCV+ASV proved to be dominant over PR, with a cost saving of ¥33,480(5,096 USD) and gains in QALYs and life years of 1.29 and 0.85, respectively. The lifetime risk of compensated cirrhosis, decompensated cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma and liver-related death was greatly reduced with DCV+ASV. Univariate sensitivity analysis demonstrated that key influencers were the discount rate, time horizon, initial disease severity and sustained virological response rate of DCV+ASV, with all scenarios resulting in additional benefit. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis demonstrated that DCV+ASV has a high likelihood (100%) of being cost-effective. CONCLUSION: DCV+ASV is not only an effective and well-tolerated regimen to treat chronic HCV genotype 1b infection treatment-naïve patients, but also is more cost-effective than PR regimen. DCV+ASV can benefit both the public health and reimbursement system in China.
Assuntos
Antivirais/administração & dosagem , Hepatite C Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Hepatite C Crônica/economia , Imidazóis/administração & dosagem , Isoquinolinas/administração & dosagem , Sulfonamidas/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Antivirais/economia , Carbamatos , China/epidemiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Análise Custo-Benefício , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Genótipo , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Imidazóis/economia , Interferon-alfa/administração & dosagem , Interferon-alfa/economia , Isoquinolinas/economia , Masculino , Cadeias de Markov , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Método de Monte Carlo , Polietilenoglicóis/administração & dosagem , Polietilenoglicóis/economia , Probabilidade , Pirrolidinas , Qualidade de Vida , Proteínas Recombinantes/administração & dosagem , Proteínas Recombinantes/economia , Ribavirina/administração & dosagem , Ribavirina/economia , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Sulfonamidas/economia , Resultado do Tratamento , Valina/análogos & derivadosRESUMO
Hepatitis C infection imposes a high economic burden globally. It has been estimated that in 2012, the healthcare cost of Hepatitis C virus (HCV) was $6.5 billion. Furthermore, it has been projected that the cost will reach at $9.1 billion by the year 2024.Frequency of hepatitis C in Pakistan is significantly higher (4.5%) when compared to the populations like India (0.7%), Nepal (1.0), Myanmar (2.5%), Iran (0.8%), China (1%) and Afghanistan (1.1%). The current standard of care for chronic infection with hepatitis C virus is 24 or 48 weeks of therapy with Pegylated interferon-alfa-2a (Peg INF) +Ribavirin (RV) or Interferon alfa-2a (INF) + RV. The objective of this study was to determine that which combination is more effective and the gain in sustained virologic response (SVR) is worth the incremental cost. In total 84 patients were enrolled who received current standard treatment of care for chronic infection with HCV either 24 or 48 weeks of therapy with Peg INF + RV or INF + RV. A pharmacoeconomic analysis was done including fixed and variable cost (comprising concomitant therapies, emergency visits and hospital admissions) of both treatment regimens were calculated and compared with the SVR accomplished by the patients. It was concluded that the Peg INF + RV is cost effective as compared with conventional INF + RV for the treatment of adult patients infected with HCV genotype 3a under a varied array of possibilities regarding treatment costs and effectiveness.
Assuntos
Antivirais/economia , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Hepatite C/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos de Coortes , Custos de Medicamentos , Quimioterapia Combinada/economia , Farmacoeconomia , Feminino , Hepatite C/economia , Humanos , Interferon alfa-2/economia , Interferon alfa-2/uso terapêutico , Interferon-alfa/economia , Interferon-alfa/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Paquistão , Polietilenoglicóis/economia , Polietilenoglicóis/uso terapêutico , Estudos Prospectivos , Proteínas Recombinantes/economia , Proteínas Recombinantes/uso terapêutico , Ribavirina/economia , Ribavirina/uso terapêutico , Resposta Viral Sustentada , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
PURPOSE: New direct-acting antiviral (DAA) drugs have revolutionized the treatment of hepatitis C in recent years. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to analyse the cost effectiveness of combinations of different DAAs compared with ribavirin and peginterferon-α-2a, taking into account rebates from tender negotiations. METHODS: We used a compartmental model specifically developed for Norway to simulate hepatitis C and complications with and without different DAAs. All costs were based on Norwegian fees and estimates, estimating healthcare sector costs for the year 2016. We performed Monte Carlo simulations on uncertain input parameters to facilitate probabilistic sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: For patients diagnosed with genotype 1, the combination of paritaprevir, ritonavir, ombitasvir and dasabuvir was cost effective compared with eight other available alternatives, given a cost-effectiveness threshold of 70,000 per quality-adjusted life-year. For genotype 2, the combination of sofosbuvir and ribavirin was the most effective and cost-effective alternative for all patients. Among available alternatives for patients with genotype 3, sofosbuvir in combination with peginterferon and ribavirin was the most cost-effective alternative, although the combination of daclatasvir and sofosbuvir was somewhat more effective. CONCLUSIONS: For each of the hepatitis C genotypes 1, 2 and 3, there were combinations of DAAs that were cost effective in a Norwegian setting. As a result of recent tender negotiations in Norway, treating all diagnosed patients with hepatitis C with the most cost-effective DAAs will result in lower total expenditure on these medications compared with 2015.
Assuntos
Antivirais/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício/estatística & dados numéricos , Quimioterapia Combinada/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hepatite C/economia , Adulto , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Hepatite C/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Interferon-alfa/economia , Interferon-alfa/uso terapêutico , Modelos Econômicos , Método de Monte Carlo , Noruega , Polietilenoglicóis/economia , Polietilenoglicóis/uso terapêutico , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Proteínas Recombinantes/economia , Proteínas Recombinantes/uso terapêutico , Ribavirina/economia , Ribavirina/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Financial constraints, social taboos and beliefs in alternative medicine are common reasons for delaying or not considering treatment for hepatitis C in India. The present study was planned to analyze the impact of non-banking interest free loan facility in patients affected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) in North India. METHODS: This one year observational, retrospective study was conducted in Department of Gastroenterology (January 2012-December 2013), Dayanand Medical College and Hospital Ludhiana, to evaluate the impact of program titled "Sambhav" (which provided non-banking financial assistance and counselor services) on treatment initiation and therapeutic compliance in HCV patients. Data of fully evaluated patients with chronic hepatitis, and/or cirrhosis due to HCV infection who were treated with Peginterferon alfa and ribavirin (RBV) combination during this duration (2012-2013) was collected from patient medical records and analyzed. In the year 2012, eligible patients who were offered antiviral treatment paid for treatment themselves, while in 2013, 'Sambhav' program was launched and this provided interest free financing by non-banking financial company (NBFC) for the treatment of HCV in addition to free counselor services for disease management. The treatment initiation and compliance rates were compared between the patients (n = 585) enrolled in 2013 who were offered 'Sambhav' assistance and those enrolled in 2012 (n = 628) when 'Sambhav' was not available. RESULTS: Introduction of Sambhav program improved the rates of treatment initiation (59% in 2013 vs. 51% in 2012, P=.004). Of the 585 eligible patients offered 'Sambhav' assistance in 2013, 233 patients (39.8%) applied but 106/233 (45.4%) received assistance. Antiviral therapy was started in 93/106 (87.7%) of these patients, while only 52 (42.5%) of 127 patients whose applications were rejected underwent treatment. Compliance to antiviral therapy also improved with the introduction of 'Sambhav' program (87.7% vs. 74.1%, P=.001). CONCLUSION: 'Sambhav' program had significant impact on the initiation of antiviral therapy by overcoming the financial hurdles. The free counselor services helped to mitigate social taboos and imparted adequate awareness about the disease to the patients. Initiatives like 'Sambhav' can be utilized for improving healthcare services in developing countries, especially for chronic diseases.
Assuntos
Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Aconselhamento/organização & administração , Hepatite C Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Interferon-alfa/uso terapêutico , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Polietilenoglicóis/uso terapêutico , Antivirais/economia , Conselheiros/organização & administração , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Hepatite C Crônica/economia , Humanos , Índia , Interferon-alfa/economia , Masculino , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/psicologia , Polietilenoglicóis/economia , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Proteínas Recombinantes/economia , Proteínas Recombinantes/uso terapêutico , Medicina Estatal , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Eradication of hepatitis C virus (HCV) using direct-acting agents (DAA) has been associated with a financial burden to health authorities worldwide. We aimed to evaluate the guideline-based treatment costs by DAAs from the perspective of the Brazilian Ministry of Health (BMoH). METHODS: The activity based costing method was used to estimate the cost for monitoring/treatment of genotype-1 (GT1) HCV patients by the following strategies: peg-interferon (PEG-IFN)/ribavirin (RBV) for 48 weeks, PEG-IFN/RBV plus boceprevir (BOC) or telaprevir (TEL) for 48 weeks, and sofosbuvir (SOF) plus daclastavir (DCV) or simeprevir (SIM) for 12 weeks. Costs were reported in United States Dollars without (US$) and with adjustment for purchasing power parity (PPP$). Drug costs were collected at the National Database of Health Prices and an overview of the literature was performed to assess effectiveness of SOF/DCV and SOF/SIM regimens in real-world cohorts. RESULTS: Treatment costs of GT1-HCV patients were PPP$ 43,176.28 (US$ 24,020.16) for PEG-IFN/RBV, PPP$ 71,196.03 (US$ 39,578.23) for PEG-IFN/RBV/BOC and PPP$ 86,250.33 (US$ 47,946.92) for PEG-IFN/RBV/TEL. Treatment by all-oral interferon-free regimens were the less expensive approach: PPP$ 19,761.72 (US$ 10,985.90) for SOF/DCV and PPP$ 21,590.91 (US$ 12,002.75) for SOF/SIM. The overview reported HCV eradication in up to 98% for SOF/DCV and 96% for SOF/SIM. CONCLUSION: Strategies with all oral interferon-free might lead to lower costs for management of GT1-HCV patients compared to IFN-based regimens in Brazil. This occurred mainly because of high discounts over international DAA prices due to negotiation between BMoH and pharmaceutical industries.
Assuntos
Antivirais/economia , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Hepatite C Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Brasil , Carbamatos , Custos e Análise de Custo , Custos de Medicamentos , Genótipo , Hepatite C Crônica/economia , Hepatite C Crônica/genética , Hepatite C Crônica/patologia , Humanos , Imidazóis/economia , Imidazóis/uso terapêutico , Interferon-alfa/economia , Interferon-alfa/uso terapêutico , Cirrose Hepática/patologia , Oligopeptídeos/economia , Oligopeptídeos/uso terapêutico , Prolina/análogos & derivados , Prolina/economia , Prolina/uso terapêutico , Pirrolidinas , Ribavirina/economia , Ribavirina/uso terapêutico , Simeprevir/economia , Simeprevir/uso terapêutico , Sofosbuvir/economia , Sofosbuvir/uso terapêutico , Valina/análogos & derivadosRESUMO
Approximately 10 million Pakistan's of population is a victim of Hepatitis C virus. A comparative study of two treatments for Hepatitis C being provided in private clinics and government hospitals was conducted to evaluate the cost effectiveness of these treatments. The quality adjusted life years (QALYs) for each treatment plan was determined with the help of health utilities, using EQ-5D scores. A comprehensive data collection form aided in scrutinizing the cause and effect of each treatment on the patient's quality of life. The total sample size for this study is 200 total from the public and private sectors. For both the treatment strategies, values for quality adjusted life years (QALYs), incremental cost effective ratio (ICER) and cost effective analysis (CEA) were calculated. The Hepatitis C virus 3a and 3b genotypic patients who were treated with pegylated interferon α-2a and ribavirin combination (strategy 2) showed an increased quality adjusted life years (QALYs) of two years, as compared to those who received interferon α-2a and ribavirin regimen (strategy 1). An incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) of Rs 144673.5 per quality adjusted life year (QALYs) was gained by patients treated with strategy 2. The therapy followed by the government sector (strategy 1) is relatively inexpensive accounting for Rs 654.5/quality adjusted life years (QALY) and therapy provided at the clinic sector (strategy 2) is relatively expensive Rs 5620.6/ quality adjusted life years (QALY). However, the cost effectiveness analysis for the pegylated interferon therapy is quite comparable with the other standard treatments; hence it can be called cost effective according to the quality adjusted life years (QALYs) gained and efficacy of the said therapy.
Assuntos
Antivirais/economia , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Custos de Medicamentos , Hepatite C/tratamento farmacológico , Hepatite C/economia , Antivirais/efeitos adversos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Quimioterapia Combinada , Genótipo , Hepacivirus/efeitos dos fármacos , Hepacivirus/genética , Hepatite C/diagnóstico , Hepatite C/epidemiologia , Custos Hospitalares , Hospitais Privados/economia , Hospitais Públicos/economia , Humanos , Interferon alfa-2/economia , Interferon alfa-2/uso terapêutico , Interferon-alfa/economia , Interferon-alfa/uso terapêutico , Paquistão/epidemiologia , Polietilenoglicóis/economia , Polietilenoglicóis/uso terapêutico , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Proteínas Recombinantes/economia , Proteínas Recombinantes/uso terapêutico , Ribavirina/economia , Ribavirina/uso terapêutico , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Carga ViralAssuntos
Antivirais/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Hepatite C Crônica/economia , Interferon-alfa/economia , Polietilenoglicóis/economia , Ribavirina/economia , Antivirais/administração & dosagem , Antivirais/efeitos adversos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Genótipo , Hepacivirus/efeitos dos fármacos , Hepacivirus/genética , Hepacivirus/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Hepatite C Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Hepatite C Crônica/patologia , Hepatite C Crônica/virologia , Humanos , Interferon-alfa/administração & dosagem , Interferon-alfa/efeitos adversos , Cooperação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Polietilenoglicóis/administração & dosagem , Polietilenoglicóis/efeitos adversos , Proteínas Recombinantes/administração & dosagem , Proteínas Recombinantes/efeitos adversos , Proteínas Recombinantes/economia , Ribavirina/administração & dosagem , Ribavirina/efeitos adversosRESUMO
This paper analyzes the Minister of Health's (MoH) procurement of medicines for hepatitis C from 2005 to 2015. Data sources were the Integrated General Services Administration (SIASG), to estimate annual expenditure for selected medicines of the MoH Clinical Protocols and Therapeutic Guidelines (PCDT) for Hepatitis C. All presentations and strengths recorded on SIASG were included. The unit prices were estimated based on the purchase with the highest volume each year. There was a 159.5 fold increase in expenditure of the selected medicines from 2005 to 2006, because procurement of those medicines became centralized. In 2007 there was 730% increase in spending due to the incorporation of pegainterferons alfa 2a and 2b. In 2012 the purchase of only two new direct-acting antivirals (DAA) accounted for 99% of total annual expenditure. In 2015 the adoption of a new DAA led to an increase of 230% (R$945 million) in MoH spending. The significant increase of MoH expenditure on medicines for hepatitis C from 2005 to 2015 was due to the increase of volumes purchased as well as the incorporation of alfapeginterferon and new DAAs. Ensuring universal access to treatment for hepatitis C will depend on the implementation of strategies that strengthen the MoH's bargaining power in price reduction negotiations with the manufacturers of monopoly medicines.
Assuntos
Antivirais/economia , Gastos em Saúde/tendências , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/economia , Hepatite C/tratamento farmacológico , Brasil , Custos de Medicamentos , Hepatite C/economia , Humanos , Interferon alfa-2 , Interferon-alfa/economia , Polietilenoglicóis/economia , Proteínas Recombinantes/economiaRESUMO
Resumo O artigo analisa as compras de medicamentos para hepatite C, feitas pelo Ministério da Saúde (MS), de 2005 a 2015. Os dados são do Sistema Integrado de Administração de Serviços Gerais (SIASG). Para estimar o gasto contratado anual selecionou-se medicamentos previstos nos Protocolos Clínicos e Diretrizes Terapêuticas para Hepatite C do MS e incluiu-se todas as apresentações e concentrações que apareceram no SIASG. Houve aumento de 159,5 vezes no gasto com os medicamentos selecionados de 2005 a 2006 porque esses produtos passaram a ser comprados de forma centralizada. Em 2007 houve aumento de 730% no gasto pela incorporação de alfapeginterferona 2a e 2b. Em 2012 a compra de dois novos antivirais de ação direta (AAD) representou 99% do gasto anual. Em 2015, a adoção de novos AAD provocou aumento de 230% (R$ 945 milhões) no gasto do MS. No período estudado houve aumento dos gastos do MS com os medicamentos para Hepatite C devido ao aumento do volume adquirido e à incorporação tecnológica de alfapeginterferona e de novos AAD. Garantir acesso universal ao tratamento da hepatite C depende da implementação de estratégias que aumentem o poder de barganha do MS em negociações de redução de preços de produtos em situação de monopólio.
Abstract This paper analyzes the Minister of Health's (MoH) procurement of medicines for hepatitis C from 2005 to 2015. Data sources were the Integrated General Services Administration (SIASG), to estimate annual expenditure for selected medicines of the MoH Clinical Protocols and Therapeutic Guidelines (PCDT) for Hepatitis C. All presentations and strengths recorded on SIASG were included. The unit prices were estimated based on the purchase with the highest volume each year. There was a 159.5 fold increase in expenditure of the selected medicines from 2005 to 2006, because procurement of those medicines became centralized. In 2007 there was 730% increase in spending due to the incorporation of pegainterferons alfa 2a and 2b. In 2012 the purchase of only two new direct-acting antivirals (DAA) accounted for 99% of total annual expenditure. In 2015 the adoption of a new DAA led to an increase of 230% (R$945 million) in MoH spending. The significant increase of MoH expenditure on medicines for hepatitis C from 2005 to 2015 was due to the increase of volumes purchased as well as the incorporation of alfapeginterferon and new DAAs. Ensuring universal access to treatment for hepatitis C will depend on the implementation of strategies that strengthen the MoH's bargaining power in price reduction negotiations with the manufacturers of monopoly medicines.
Assuntos
Humanos , Antivirais/economia , Hepatite C/tratamento farmacológico , Gastos em Saúde/tendências , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/economia , Polietilenoglicóis/economia , Proteínas Recombinantes , Brasil , Interferon-alfa/economia , Custos de Medicamentos , Hepatite C/economia , Interferon alfa-2RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIM: In Asia-Pacific where cost is a major concern, peginterferon plus ribavirin (PR) often remain as the standard of care in chronic hepatitis C (CHC) treatment, while the direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) are commonly recommended as retreatment. Newer DAAs can achieve a sustained virological response (SVR) of nearly 100% with pan-genotypic coverage, that is "Highly Effective DAAs." We aimed to investigate the most desirable cost range for the Highly Effective DAAs using Hong Kong as an example. METHODS: Markov modeling was performed using PR as the reference strategy. The cost-effectiveness of the Highly Effective DAAs was compared with sofosbuvir-PR (first-line and rescue) and boceprevir-PR therapies. A 50-year-old genotype 1b hepatitis C virus (HCV) infected treatment-naïve patient with METAVIR F3 was used as the base case scenario to reflect the commonest HCV genotype in Hong Kong. RESULTS: The use of PR would incur a lifetime cost of US$35,854 and effectiveness of 14.85 quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). Sofosbuvir-PR as first-line treatment was dominated by other regimes. If Sofosbuvir-PR rescue therapy was used, the drug cost of Highly Effective DAAs should be set below US$43,553, with a cost-effectiveness ratio (CER) of US$3035/QALY compared with PR. In regions where Boceprevir-PR was still used as first-line therapy, the desirable drug cost of Highly Effective DAAs would be below US$56,985 to achieve a CER of US$5427/QALY. CONCLUSIONS: The most desirable costs of the Highly Effective DAAs would be below US$43,553 if Sofosbuvir-PR rescue therapy is used and below US$56,985 if Boceprevir-PR therapy is used.
Assuntos
Antivirais/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Hepatite C Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Interferon-alfa/economia , Polietilenoglicóis/economia , Prolina/análogos & derivados , Ribavirina/economia , Sofosbuvir/economia , Antivirais/administração & dosagem , Combinação de Medicamentos , Genótipo , Hepacivirus/genética , Hepatite C Crônica/economia , Hepatite C Crônica/virologia , Hong Kong , Humanos , Interferon-alfa/administração & dosagem , Cadeias de Markov , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Polietilenoglicóis/administração & dosagem , Prolina/administração & dosagem , Prolina/economia , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Proteínas Recombinantes/administração & dosagem , Proteínas Recombinantes/economia , Ribavirina/administração & dosagem , Sofosbuvir/administração & dosagem , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is associated with high burden and healthcare costs. Virologic response achieved with antivirals is associated with progression avoidance. This study aimed to estimate the efficiency and clinical impact of antiviral strategies in CHB patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A Markov model estimated lifetime complications and direct costs in both, HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative cohorts. Strategy 1 (71% of treated population) and strategy 2 (100%), both based on pegylated interferon (peg-IFN) followed by oral tenofovir or entecavir, were compared to no treatment. Progression was based on HBV-DNA levels. Rescue therapy with oral antivirals was applied for peg-IFN failure. Disease costs (C, 2014) and utilities were obtained from literature. RESULTS: Compared to natural history, strategy 1 increased QALY (3.98 in HBeAg-positive, 2.16 in -negative cohort). With strategy 2, survival was up to 5.60 (HBeAg-positive) and 3.05 QALY (in HBeAg-negative). The model predicted avoidance of 128 and 86 carcinomas in HBeAg-positive and -negative patients with strategy 1, and up to 181 and 121 in HBeAg-positive and -negative for strategy 2. Total cost increased up to C102,841 (strategy 1) and C105,408 (strategy 2) in HBeAg-positive, and C85,858 and C93,754 in HBeAg-negative. A C1,581/QALY gained ratio was estimated versus the natural history for both strategies. In conclusion, increasing antiviral coverage would be efficient, reducing complications.