Molecular identification and in vitro assessment of zoonotic-potential of a novel Orthobunyavirus isolated from broiler chicken in Malaysia.

We have previously isolated a novel avian Orthobunyavirus, Kedah Fatal Kidney Syndrome (KFKS) virus from a broiler farm in Kedah, Malaysia in 2020 with a severe kidney lesion in chickens. The virus was designated as KFKS2_CS virus. Sequence analysis of partial nucleocapsid (N) and nonstructural (NSs) sequence of this virus showed the highest sequence identity with previous KFKS1 from Malaysia (100%) and 97% with a zoonotic Umbre (UMB) virus, which was reported to cause encephalitis in immunocompromised humans in India. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that this virus was clustered together with previous KFKS1 virus from Malaysia, UMB and Cristoli viruses. This study aimed to assess the zoonotic potential of this KFKS2_CS virus in vitro by determining its ability to inhibit the production of interferon (IFN) in human glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) brain cells using reverse-transcriptase polymerase reaction (RT-PCR). This virus blocked the production of interferon-a in this human brain cells. In conclusion, this KFKS2_CS virus may have a zoonotic potential and become a public health concern in the future.

Disease-modifying therapies and cost-of-illness progression among people newly diagnosed with multiple sclerosis: a national register-based cohort study covering treatment initiation with interferons, glatiramer acetate or natalizumab.

OBJECTIVES: Disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) can slow disease progression in multiple sclerosis (MS). The objective of this study was to explore the cost-of-illness (COI) progression among newly diagnosed people with MS in relation to the first DMT received. DESIGN AND SETTING: A cohort study using data from nationwide registers in Sweden. PARTICIPANTS: People with MS (PwMS) in Sweden first diagnosed in 2006-2015, when aged 20-55, receiving first-line therapy with interferons (IFN), glatiramer acetate (GA) or natalizumab (NAT). They were followed up through 2016. OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcomes (in Euros, €) were: (1) secondary healthcare costs: specialised outpatient and inpatient care including out-of-pocket expenditure, DMTs including hospital-administered MS therapies, and prescribed drugs, and (2) productivity losses: sickness absence and disability pension. Descriptive statistics and Poisson regression were computed, adjusting for disability progression using the Expanded Disability Status Scale. RESULTS: 3673 newly diagnosed PwMS who were treated with IFN (N=2696), GA (N=441) or NAT (N=536) were identified. Healthcare costs were similar for the INF and GA groups, while the NAT group had higher costs (p value<0.05), owing to DMT and outpatient costs. IFN had lower productivity losses than NAT and GA (p value>0.05), driven by fewer sickness absence days. NAT had a trend towards lower disability pension costs compared with GA (p value>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Similar trends over time for healthcare costs and productivity losses were identified across the DMT subgroups. PwMS on NAT maintained their work capacity for a longer time compared with those on GA, potentially leading to lower disability pension costs over time. COI serves as an objective measure to explore the importance of DMTs in maintaining low levels of progression of MS over time.

Assessment of serum interleukin-28 as a biomarker to predict mortality in traumatic patients with sepsis.

BACKGROUND: Serious trauma due to various factors is a major global public issue, and sepsis is a major cause of trauma-associated mortality. Timely diagnosis and suitable treatment of post-traumatic sepsis are crucial to improve the hospital outcome of traumatic patients. IL-28 is a newly discovered member of IFN-λ family with multiple functions in inflammatory response. To date, its role in the pathogenic mechanisms of post-traumatic sepsis still remains unknown. METHODS: In total, 20 healthy controls, 55 traumatic patients without sepsis and 54 traumatic patients with sepsis were enrolled in this study. Serum IL-28A/B levels were investigated by ELISA. RESULTS: IL-28A/B levels were significantly increased in traumatic patients compared to healthy volunteers. Moreover, septic trauma patients displayed a significant increase in IL-28A/B levels compared with non-septic patients. In septic patients, IL-28A/B were negatively correlated with IFN-γ, IL-5, IL-13 and IL-17, and positively associated with IL-10. Moreover, IL-28A (AUC: 0.821, 95 %CI: 0.693-0.949) and IL-28B (AUC: 0.811, 95 %CI: 0.691-0.931) were both beneficial to predict increased mortality risk in septic trauma patients, though there was no statistical difference in the predictive value between them. CONCLUSIONS: Early serum levels of IL-28A/B were associated with the development of post-trauma sepsis and could be applied to assess the outcome of traumatic patients with sepsis. Thus, IL-28 may be a potential indicator for post-traumatic sepsis.

Grass Carp Reovirus VP56 Allies VP4, Recruits, Blocks, and Degrades RIG-I to More Effectively Attenuate IFN Responses and Facilitate Viral Evasion.

Grass carp reovirus (GCRV), the most virulent aquareovirus, causes epidemic hemorrhagic disease and tremendous economic loss in freshwater aquaculture industry. VP56, a putative fibrin inlaying the outer surface of GCRV-II and GCRV-III, is involved in cell attachment. In the present study, we found that VP56 localizes at the early endosome, lysosome, and endoplasmic reticulum, recruits the cytoplasmic viral RNA sensor retinoic acid-inducible gene I (RIG-I) and binds to it. The interaction between VP56 and RIG-I was detected by endogenous coimmunoprecipitation (co-IP), glutathione S-transferase (GST) pulldown, and subsequent liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and was then confirmed by traditional co-IPs and a novel far-red mNeptune-based bimolecular fluorescence complementation system. VP56 binds to the helicase domain of RIG-I. VP56 enhances K48-linked ubiquitination of RIG-I to degrade it by the proteasomal pathway. Thus, VP56 impedes the initial immune function of RIG-I by dual mechanisms (blockade and degradation) and attenuates signaling from RIG-I recognizing viral RNA, subsequently weakening downstream signaling transduction and interferon (IFN) responses. Accordingly, host antiviral effectors are reduced, and cytopathic effects are increased. These findings were corroborated by RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) and VP56 knockdown. Finally, we found that VP56 and the major outer capsid protein VP4 bind together in the cytosol to enhance the degradation of RIG-I and more efficiently facilitate viral replication. Collectively, the results indicated that VP56 allies VP4, recruits, blocks, and degrades RIG-I, thereby attenuating IFNs and antiviral effectors to facilitate viral evasion more effectively. This study reveals a virus attacking target and an escaping strategy from host antiviral immunity for GCRV and will help understand mechanisms of infection of reoviruses. IMPORTANCE Grass carp reovirus (GCRV) fibrin VP56 and major outer capsid protein VP4 inlay and locate on the outer surface of GCRV-II and GCRV-III, which causes tremendous loss in grass carp and black carp industries. Fibrin is involved in cell attachment and plays an important role in reovirus infection. The present study identified the interaction proteins of VP56 and found that VP56 and VP4 bind to the different domains of the viral RNA sensor retinoic acid-inducible gene I (RIG-I) in grass carp to block RIG-I sensing of viral RNA and induce RIG-I degradation by the proteasomal pathway to attenuate signaling transduction, thereby suppressing interferons (IFNs) and antiviral effectors, facilitating viral replication. VP56 and VP4 bind together in the cytosol to more efficiently facilitate viral evasion. This study reveals a virus attacking a target and an escaping strategy from host antiviral immunity for GCRV and will be helpful in understanding the mechanisms of infection of reoviruses.

Cost-effectiveness of ipilimumab versus high-dose interferon as an adjuvant therapy in resected high-risk melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant ipilimumab was found to improve the overall survival and reduce toxicity compared to high-dose interferon (HDI) in patients with resected, high-risk melanoma. However, the cost of ipilimumab is substantially higher than HDI. This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of ipilimumab as an adjuvant treatment in melanoma from a healthcare perspective. METHODS: We designed a Markov model simulating resected, high-risk melanoma patients receiving either ipilimumab or HDI. Transition probabilities, including risks of survival, disease progression, and toxicity, were ascertained from clinical trial data. Costs and quality of life measurements (health utilities) were extracted from the literature. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), defined as incremental costs divided by incremental quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), assessed cost-effectiveness. ICERs <$100,000/QALY were deemed cost-effective. We measured model uncertainty with one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: In our base case model, ipilimumab increased costs by $107,100 and increased effectiveness by 0.43 QALY, yielding an ICER of $392,600/QALY. Our model was moderately sensitive to the costs of ipilimumab, though the cost of ipilimumab would need to decrease by 44% for ipilimumab to become cost-effective compared to HDI. The model was not sensitive to survival, toxicity, or other costs. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that HDI would remain the cost-effective treatment option 96.2% of the time at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000/QALY. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant ipilimumab increases the survival and decreases the toxicity compared to HDI in resected, high-risk melanoma patients, though this would not be considered cost-effective due to the high price of ipilimumab.

Possible treatment and strategies for COVID-19: review and assessment.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is declared as an international emergency in 2020. Its prevalence and fatality rate are rapidly increasing but the medication options are still limited for this perilous disease. The emergent outbreak of COVID-19 triggered by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) keeps propagating globally. The present scenario has emphasized the requirement for therapeutic opportunities to relive and overcome this latest pandemic. Despite the fact, the deteriorating developments of COVID-19, there is no drug certified to have considerable effects in the medical treatment for COVID-19 patients. The COVID-19 pandemic requests for the rapid testing of new treatment approaches. Based on the evidence, hydroxychloroquine is the first medicine opted for the treatment of disease. Umifenovir, remdesivir, and fevipiravir are deemed the most hopeful antiviral agent by improving the health of infected patients. The dexamethasone is a first known steroid medicine that can save the lives of seriously ill patients, and it is shown in a randomized clinical trial by the United Kingdom that it reduced the death rate in COVID-19 patients. The current review recapitulates the existing evidence of possible therapeutic drugs, peptides, humanized antibodies, convulsant plasma, and vaccination that has revealed potential in fighting COVID-19 infections. Many randomized and controlled clinical trials are taking place to further validate these agent's safety and effectiveness in curing COVID-19.

Assessment of the Potential Adverse Events Related to Ribavirin-Interferon Combination for Novel Coronavirus Therapy.

PURPOSE: We aimed to analyze and evaluate the safety signals of ribavirin-interferon combination through data mining of the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), so as to provide reference for the rationale use of these agents in the management of relevant toxicities emerging in patients with novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19). METHODS: Reports to the FAERS from 1 January 2004 to 8 March 2020 were analyzed. The proportion of report ratio (PRR), reporting odds ratio (ROR), and Bayesian confidence interval progressive neural network (BCPNN) method were used to detect the safety signals. RESULTS: A total of 55 safety signals were detected from the top 250 adverse event reactions in 2200 reports, but 19 signals were not included in the drug labels. All the detected adverse event reactions were associated with 13 System Organ Classes (SOC), such as gastrointestinal, blood and lymph, hepatobiliary, endocrine, and various nervous systems. The most frequent adverse events were analyzed, and the results showed that females were more likely to suffer from anemia, vomiting, neutropenia, diarrhea, and insomnia. CONCLUSION: The ADE (adverse drug event) signal detection based on FAERS is helpful to clarify the potential adverse events related to ribavirin-interferon combination for novel coronavirus therapy; clinicians should pay attention to the adverse reactions of gastrointestinal and blood systems, closely monitor the fluctuations of the platelet count, and carry out necessary mental health interventions to avoid serious adverse events.

Cost-effectiveness of fingolimod versus interferon-ß1a for the treatment of pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis in Canada.

AIMS: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of fingolimod versus interferon (IFN)-ß1a at a dose of 30 µg per week for the treatment of relapsing pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis (POMS) in Canada. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A discrete-time Markov model was developed to compare fingolimod with IFN ß-1a over a time horizon of two years representing patients followed up to mean age of 18 years from a Canadian health care system perspective. Twenty-one health states based on the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) were considered: EDSS 0‒9 for relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS), EDSS 0‒9 for secondary progressive MS, and "Death." Relative treatment efficacy for fingolimod versus IFN-ß1a was estimated from the PARADIGMS study. Costs and resource use were obtained from published literature and Canadian sources. Utilities were estimated by mapping the Pediatric Quality of Life inventory data onto the Child Health Utility Index-9 Dimension using a published mapping algorithm. Future costs and benefits were discounted at 1.5% per annum. RESULTS: Compared with IFN ß-1a, fingolimod led to an increase in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) (0.125) with incremental costs (Canadian dollars [CAD] 2,977) and to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of CAD 23,886/QALY over a time horizon of two years representing patients followed up to mean age of 18 years. The monetary benefits of fingolimod treatment versus IFN ß-1a at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of CAD 50,000 per QALY gained were higher than the costs. One-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) both confirmed the robustness of the results. LIMITATIONS: The main limitations of this analysis primarily stem from the limited data availability in POMS. CONCLUSIONS: Fingolimod is cost effective compared with IFN ß-1a for the treatment of POMS over a time horizon of two years representing patients followed up to a mean age of 18 years in Canada.

Assessment of prognostic and diagnostic value of some biomarkers in hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is an increasing problem worldwide. Determining a prognosis is important for the management of HCC. AIM: We aimed to investigate the impact of interleukin (IL)-29, galectin-3, leptin, fibronectin and protease-activated receptor-1 on the prognosis and diagnosis of patients with HCC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 60 HCC patients (75% male) and 20 healthy volunteers (70% male) were enrolled in this prospective study. Serum samples were obtained during the first admission before any adjuvant or metastatic treatments were administered. Serum biomarkers were determined using ELISA kits. RESULTS: All patients had cirrhosis, and the Child - Pugh stages were as follows: 61.5% Child - Pugh A, 35.9% Child - Pugh B and 2.6% Child - Pugh C (61.7% hepatitis B virus, 11.7% hepatitis C virus, 6.7% hepatitis B virus + hepatitis C virus, 11.7% alcoholic and 8.3% cryptogenic). Fifty-three percent of the HCC patients died within a median of 7.5 months. The mean serum level of IL-29 in patients with HCC was higher than that in the control group (32.55 pg/ml vs 11.46 pg/ml, p < 0.015). Galectin-3 levels were significantly higher in the HCC group (6.7 ng/ml vs 1.38 ng/ml, p < 0.001). Fibronectin levels were higher in the control group than in the HCC group (260 635 ng/ml vs 257 353 ng/ml). However, the mean protease-activated receptor-1 and leptin levels were similar between the two groups (p > 0.05). The biomarkers were divided into two groups according to their median level. In the log rank analysis, biomarkers had no effect on survival (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: IL-29 and galectin-3 levels were significantly higher in HCC patients. Although IL-29 and galectin-3 can be used as diagnostic markers for HCC, they had no prognostic value in HCC patients.

Informe diário de evidências COVID-19: Busca realizada em 5 de agosto de 2020 / Daily evidence report COVID-19: Search conducted on August 5, 2020

O Informe Diário de Evidências é uma produção do Ministério da Saúde que tem como objetivo acompanhar diariamente as publicações científicas sobre tratamento farmacológico e vacinas para a COVID-19. Dessa forma, são realizadas buscas estruturadas em bases de dados biomédicas, referentes ao dia anterior desse informe. Não são incluídos estudos pré-clínicos (in vitro, in vivo, in silico). A frequência dos estudos é demonstrada de acordo com a sua classificação metodológica (revisões sistemáticas, ensaios clínicos randomizados, coortes, entre outros). Para cada estudo é apresentado um resumo com avaliação da qualidade metodológica. Essa avaliação tem por finalidade identificar o grau de certeza/confiança ou o risco de viés de cada estudo. Para tal, são utilizadas ferramentas já validadas e consagradas na literatura científica, na área de saúde baseada em evidências. Cabe ressaltar que o documento tem caráter informativo e não representa uma recomendação oficial do Ministério da Saúde sobre a temática. Foram encontrados 11 artigos e 6 protocolos.

Informe diário de evidências COVID-19: busca realizada em 7 de agosto de 2020 / COVID-19 daily evidence report: search conducted on August 7, 2020

O Informe Diário de Evidências é uma produção do Ministério da Saúde que tem como objetivo acompanhar diariamente as publicações científicas sobre tratamento farmacológico e vacinas para a COVID-19. Dessa forma, são realizadas buscas estruturadas em bases de dados biomédicas, referentes ao dia anterior desse informe. Não são incluídos estudos pré-clínicos (in vitro, in vivo, in silico). A frequência dos estudos é demonstrada de acordo com a sua classificação metodológica (revisões sistemáticas, ensaios clínicos randomizados, coortes, entre outros). Para cada estudo é apresentado um resumo com avaliação da qualidade metodológica. Essa avaliação tem por finalidade identificar o grau de certeza/confiança ou o risco de viés de cada estudo. Para tal, são utilizadas ferramentas já validadas e consagradas na literatura científica, na área de saúde baseada em evidências. Cabe ressaltar que o documento tem caráter informativo e não representa uma recomendação oficial do Ministério da Saúde sobre a temática. Foram encontrados 12 artigos e 4 protocolos.

Informe diário de evidências COVID-19: busca realizada em 20 de julho de 2020 / COVID-19 daily evidence report: search conducted on July 20, 2020

O Informe Diário de Evidências é uma produção do Ministério da Saúde que tem como objetivo acompanhar diariamente as publicações científicas sobre tratamento farmacológico e vacinas para a COVID-19. Dessa forma, são realizadas buscas estruturadas em bases de dados biomédicas, referentes ao dia anterior desse informe. Não são incluídos estudos pré-clínicos (in vitro, in vivo, in silico). A frequência dos estudos é demonstrada de acordo com a sua classificação metodológica (revisões sistemáticas, ensaios clínicos randomizados, coortes, entre outros). Para cada estudo é apresentado um resumo com avaliação da qualidade metodológica. Essa avaliação tem por finalidade identificar o grau de certeza/confiança ou o risco de viés de cada estudo. Para tal, são utilizadas ferramentas já validadas e consagradas na literatura científica, na área de saúde baseada em evidências. Cabe ressaltar que o documento tem caráter informativo e não representa uma recomendação oficial do Ministério da Saúde sobre a temática. Foram encontrados 14 artigos.

Informe diário de evidências COVID-19: busca realizada em 21 de julho de 2020 / COVID-19 daily evidence report: search conducted on July 21, 2020

O Informe Diário de Evidências é uma produção do Ministério da Saúde que tem como objetivo acompanhar diariamente as publicações científicas sobre tratamento farmacológico e vacinas para a COVID-19. Dessa forma, são realizadas buscas estruturadas em bases de dados biomédicas, referentes ao dia anterior desse informe. Não são incluídos estudos pré-clínicos (in vitro, in vivo, in silico). A frequência dos estudos é demonstrada de acordo com a sua classificação metodológica (revisões sistemáticas, ensaios clínicos randomizados, coortes, entre outros). Para cada estudo é apresentado um resumo com avaliação da qualidade metodológica. Essa avaliação tem por finalidade identificar o grau de certeza/confiança ou o risco de viés de cada estudo. Para tal, são utilizadas ferramentas já validadas e consagradas na literatura científica, na área de saúde baseada em evidências. Cabe ressaltar que o documento tem caráter informativo e não representa uma recomendação oficial do Ministério da Saúde sobre a temática. Foram encontrados 9 artigos e 10 protocolos.

Intervenciones farmacológicas para el tratamiento de la enfermedad por el coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) / Pharmacological interventions for treatment sick by the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19)

INTRODUCCIÓN: En diciembre del 2019 se identificó en Wuhan (China) una serie de pacientes con infecciones respiratorias que en algunos casos evolucionaban en una neumonía viral grave, entre el 1 al 5% de los casos requerían de cuidados intensivos. El 7 de enero del 2020, las autoridades chinas anunciaron a un "nuevo coronavirus" como el agente causante de estas infecciones. La OMS denomino a este virus Covid-19. Esta enfermedad se ha diseminado a todo el mundo, causando una gran repercusión social y económica. Actualmente no existe un tratamiento específico para la enfermedad, brindándose tratamiento de soporte para todos los casos. Se han administrado algunos fármacos específicos para tratar la enfermedad, pero no hay recomendaciones concluyentes. OBJETIVO: Revisar la literatura científica sobre las intervenciones farmacológicas para el tratamiento de la enfermedad por el coronavirus 2019 (COVID ­ 19). METODOLOGÍA: Se desarrolló una búsqueda electrónica en la base de datos Medline (a través de Pubmed). Para tal fin, se construyó una estrategia de búsqueda sistemática, utilizando términos del lenguaje natural y descriptores de lenguaje controlado, teniendo como fecha de búsqueda desde el 01 de diciembre de 2019 (mes donde se reportó los primeros casos de COVID-19 en China) hasta el 20 de marzo de 2020. Se incluyó únicamente estudios publicados en idioma español o inglés. RESULTADOS: Se identificaron 947 referencias potencialmente relevantes. Tras la remoción de duplicados, y lectura de títulos y resúmenes, se seleccionaron 43 referencias para lectura a texto completo. Finalmente, se seleccionaron 15 estudios que respondieron a la pregunta PICO de interés. CONCLUSIONES: No existe a la fecha, ninguna intervención farmacológica que haya demostrado ser efectivo y segura para tratamiento de COVID-19. La calidad de la evidencia para los desenlaces reportados por los ensayos clínicos donde se evaluó Favipiravir y Lopinavir/ritonavir fue calificada como baja (Es muy probable que nuevos estudios tengan un impacto importante en la confianza que se tiene en el resultado estimado y que estos puedan modificar el resultado. La calidad de la evidencia para los desenlaces reportados por el ensayos clínico donde se evaluó Hidroxicloroquina es Muy Baja (Cualquier resultado estimado es muy incierto). No se identificó evidencia concluyente respecto al uso de Lopinavir más interferón α2b, el único estudio encontrado correspondió a una serie de 10 pacientes. Asímismo, la evidencia encontrada respecto a la combinación de arbidol y lopinavir/ritonavir se basa en serie de casos, que son estudios con muchas limitaciones, por lo que sus resultados deben analizarse con cuidado. No se obtuvo evidencia concluyente sobre el uso de arbidol, esta se basa únicamente en series de casos, con un pequeño número de pacientes. No se obtuvo evidencia concluyente sobre el uso de interferón alfa, sólo se encontró un reporte de caso.(AU)

COVID-19 et interférons / COVID-19 and interferons

CONTEXTE: Le présent document ainsi que les constats et prises de position qu'il énonce ont été rédigés en réponse à une interpellation du ministère de la Santé et des Services sociaux dans le contexte de l'urgence sanitaire liée à la maladie à coronavirus (COVID-19) au Québec. Cette position est basée sur une recension sommaire de la documentation scientifique (Pubmed, littérature grise) identifiée par des professionnels en évaluation et pharmaciens de l'INESSS. Par ailleurs, son contenu ne repose pas sur une recherche exhaustive de la littérature et une évaluation de la qualité des études avec des outils standardisés. Dans les circonstances d'une telle urgence de santé publique, l'INESSS reste à l'affût de toutes nouvelles données susceptibles de faire évoluer sa position. Ainsi, des mises à jour sont prévues. POSITION DE L'INESSS: Compte tenu de l'état des connaissances actuelles, il n'est pas justifié d'administrer un interféron en monothérapie pour le traitement des patients ayant un diagnostic confirmé ou suspecté de COVID-19. -Tous les efforts devraient être déployés pour intégrer dans des protocoles de recherche les patients ayant un diagnostic confirmé qui recevront un interféron seul ou en association avec un autre traitement. -En absence de protocoles de recherche, leur usage devrait être restreint à des patients dont la condition clinique exige une hospitalisation dans un centre désigné, en respectant des critères de sélection et posologies pré définis dans le cadre d'un protocole. -Le recours aux traitements dont les données d'efficacité comportent un niveau élevé d'incertitude devrait être conditionnel au recueil d'informations portant sur des indicateurs précis. Cela permettrait de documenter l'utilisation et les effets cliniques de ces traitements en contexte réel de soins au Québec. INTERFÉRONS: Les observations cliniques chez les animaux et les humains ont montré que les infections causées par le MERS-CoV sont médiées par la réplication virale et la réponse immunitaire de l'hôte. Ces observations ont conduit à l'exploration de traitement en combinaison avec des interférons de type I ou II. L'interféron bêta (INFb) semble montrer la meilleure efficacité dans les cultures tissulaires. -Des améliorations cliniques avec l'IFNb ont été observées chez des mammifères infectés par une souche de MERS-CoV (Chan 2015). -Des essais sont en cours (MIRACLE Trial) afin d'évaluer la combinaison lopinavir-ritonavir et INFb chez des patients infectés par un MERS-CoV. Une étude clinique ayant pour objectif d'évaluer l'efficacité de l'association lopinavir/ritonavir-IFNb chez des patients hospitalisés à la suite d'une infection par le SARS-CoV-2 (ChiCTR2000029308) a également débuté en Chine. Cependant, il semble que cette combinaison est moins efficace que le remdésivir (Sheahan 2020, Martinez 2020).

Informe diário de evidências COVID-19: busca realizada em 5 de junho de 2020 / COVID-19 daily evidence report: search conducted on June 5, 2020

O Informe Diário de Evidências é uma produção do Ministério da Saúde que tem como objetivo acompanhar diariamente as publicações científicas sobre tratamento farmacológico e vacinas para a COVID-19. Dessa forma, são realizadas buscas estruturadas em bases de dados biomédicas, referente ao dia anterior desse informe. Não são incluídos estudos pré-clínicos (in vitro, in vivo, in silico). A frequência dos estudos é demonstrada de acordo com a sua classificação metodológica (revisões sistemáticas, ensaios clínicos randomizados, coortes, entre outros). Para cada estudo é apresentado um resumo com avaliação da qualidade metodológica. Essa avaliação tem por finalidade identificar o grau de certeza/confiança ou o risco de viés de cada estudo. Para tal, são utilizadas ferramentas já validadas e consagradas na literatura científica, na área de saúde baseada em evidências. Cabe ressaltar que o documento tem caráter informativo e não representa uma recomendação oficial do Ministério da Saúde sobre a temática. Foram encontrados 11 artigos e 7 protocolos.

Informe diário de evidências COVID-19: busca realizada em 3 de junho de 2020 / COVID-19 daily evidence report: search conducted on June 3, 2020

O Informe Diário de Evidências é uma produção do Ministério da Saúde que tem como objetivo acompanhar diariamente as publicações científicas sobre tratamento farmacológico e vacinas para a COVID-19. Dessa forma, são realizadas buscas estruturadas em bases de dados biomédicas, referente ao dia anterior desse informe. Não são incluídos estudos pré-clínicos (in vitro, in vivo, in silico). A frequência dos estudos é demonstrada de acordo com a sua classificação metodológica (revisões sistemáticas, ensaios clínicos randomizados, coortes, entre outros). Para cada estudo é apresentado um resumo com avaliação da qualidade metodológica. Essa avaliação tem por finalidade identificar o grau de certeza/confiança ou o risco de viés de cada estudo. Para tal, são utilizadas ferramentas já validadas e consagradas na literatura científica, na área de saúde baseada em evidências. Cabe ressaltar que o documento tem caráter informativo e não representa uma recomendação oficial do Ministério da Saúde sobre a temática. Foram encontrados 16 artigos.

Informe diário de evidências COVID-19: busca realizada em 5 de maio de 2020 / COVID-19 daily evidence report: search conducted on May 5, 2020

Essa é uma produção do Departamento de Ciência e Tecnologia (Decit) da Secretaria de Ciência, Tecnologia, Inovação e Insumos Estratégicos em Saúde (SCTIE) do Ministério da Saúde (Decit/SCTIE/MS), que tem como missão promover a ciência e tecnologia e o uso de evidências científicas para a tomada de decisão do SUS, tendo como principal atribuição o incentivo ao desenvolvimento de pesquisas em saúde no Brasil, de modo a direcionar os investimentos realizados em pesquisa pelo Governo Federal às necessidades de saúde pública. Informar sobre as principais evidências científicas descritas na literatura internacional sobre tratamento farmacológico para a COVID-19. Além de resumir cada estudo identificado, o informe apresenta também uma avaliação da qualidade metodológica e a quantidade de artigos publicados, de acordo com a sua classificação metodológica (revisões sistemáticas, ensaios clínicos randomizados, entre outros). Foram encontrados 10 artigos e 20 protocolos.

Population-based RNA profiling in Add Health finds social disparities in inflammatory and antiviral gene regulation to emerge by young adulthood.

Health in later life varies significantly by individual demographic characteristics such as age, sex, and race/ethnicity, as well as by social factors including socioeconomic status and geographic region. This study examined whether sociodemographic variations in the immune and inflammatory molecular underpinnings of chronic disease might emerge decades earlier in young adulthood. Using data from 1,069 young adults from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health (Add Health)-the largest nationally representative and ethnically diverse sample with peripheral blood transcriptome profiles-we analyzed variation in the expression of genes involved in inflammation and type I interferon (IFN) response as a function of individual demographic factors, sociodemographic conditions, and biobehavioral factors (smoking, drinking, and body mass index). Differential gene expression was most pronounced by sex, race/ethnicity, and body mass index (BMI), but transcriptome correlates were identified for every demographic dimension analyzed. Inflammation-related gene expression showed the most pronounced variation as a function of biobehavioral factors (BMI and smoking) whereas type I IFN-related transcripts varied most strongly as a function of individual demographic characteristics (sex and race/ethnicity). Bioinformatic analyses of transcription factor and immune-cell activation based on transcriptome-wide empirical differences identified additional effects of family poverty and geographic region. These results identify pervasive sociodemographic differences in immune-cell gene regulation that emerge by young adulthood and may help explain social disparities in the development of chronic illness and premature mortality at older ages.

Paradoxical association between blood modular interferon signatures and quality of life in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

OBJECTIVES: Blood transcriptomic IFN signature is a hallmark of SLE. The impaired health-related quality of life (HRQOL) observed in SLE is poorly related to disease activity. The aim of this study was to test how IFN signatures were associated with HRQOL in SLE patients. METHODS: Among consecutive patients, blood transcriptomic profiles were analysed with a modular framework comprising 3 IFN modules: M1.2, M3.4 and M5.12. Disease activity was evaluated by the SLEDAI score, and HRQOL was assessed with the SF-36 questionnaire, which includes eight domains: physical function, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role emotional, and mental health (MH) and physical component summary and mental component summary scores. RESULTS: A total of 57 SLE patients were evaluated, among whom 27 (47%) were clinically quiescent, 30 (53%) were flaring, and 19 (33%) had active lupus nephritis. All SF-36 domains were altered in SLE patients compared with the general French population (P < 0.0001). In multivariate analysis, taking into account flares, age, ethnicity, smoking and renal severity, social functioning was independently associated with the IFN score (P = 0.027). Analyses restrained to quiescent patients (n = 27) yielded greater associations between social functioning and the three IFN modules, and between MH and M3.4. Considering all quiescent visits (n = 51), the IFN score was independently correlated with social functioning (P = 0.022) and MH (P = 0.038). CONCLUSION: This unexpected paradoxical association between IFN signature and some specific HRQOL domains argues against a pivotal role of IFNs in the persistently altered HRQOL of SLE patients.