Predictors of masked hypertension among treated hypertensive patients: an interesting association with orthostatic hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Masked hypertension (MH) entails an increased cardiovascular risk. Therefore, it is important to identify those individuals who would benefit the most from out-of-office blood pressure (BP) measurement. We sought to determine the prevalence and identify predictors of MH among adult hypertensive patients under treatment. METHODS: Treated hypertensive patients aged ≥ 18 years underwent office (duplicate sitting and standing BP in 1 visit) and home BP measurements (duplicate measurements for 4 days in the morning, afternoon, and evening; at least 16 measurements) and completed a questionnaire regarding risk factors and history of cardiovascular disease. MH was defined as normal office BP (<140/90mm Hg) with elevated home BP (≥135/85mm Hg, average of all readings discarding first day measurements). Patients with a systolic BP rise upon standing ≥5mm Hg were considered to have orthostatic hypertension (OHT). Variables indentified as relevant predictors of MH were entered into a multivariable logistic regression analysis model. RESULTS: Three hundred and four patients were included (mean age = 66.7 ±13.8; 67.4% women). The prevalence of MH in the whole population was 12.4% and was 20.9% among patients with office-controlled hypertension. Factors independently associated with MH were age (odds ratio (OR) = 1.08, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.03-1.14), high-normal office systolic BP (OR = 5.61, 95% CI = 1.39-22.57), history of peripheral artery disease (PAD) (OR = 8.83, 95% CI = 1.5-51.84), moderate alcohol consumption (OR = 0.08, 95% CI = 0.01-0.73), and OHT (OR = 3.65, 95% CI = 1.27 to 10.51). CONCLUSIONS: Easily measurable parameters such as age, office systolic BP, history of PAD, and OHT may help to detect a population at risk of MH that would benefit from home BP monitoring.

Assessment of prevalence and pathological response to orthostatic provocation in patients with multiple sclerosis.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of pathologic response to orthostatic challenge in patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) and the difference of the response in patients in relapse and remission. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We included 112 RRMS patients; group 1 included 53 patients in a relapse and group 2, 59 patients in remission. The head up tilt table test was used to provoke an orthostatic reaction. RESULTS: 71 (63%) patients (60.4% and 66% of relapse and remission subjects respectively) had a pathological response to orthostatic provocation. Syncope was found in 9 (17%) patients in group 1 compared to 22 (37.3%) in group 2 (p=0.014). Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) was found in 17 (32%) patients in group 1 compared to 4 (6.8%) in group 2 (p=0.001). There was a significantly negative correlation between the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) and POTS (-0.201; p=0.034) and a positive correlation between the EDSS and syncope (0.190; p=0.044). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of distinct types of orthostatic autonomic dysfunction in different phases of RRMS seems to be in direct correlation with the EDSS. Furthermore, certain autonomic dysfunctions of orthostasis, more specifically syncope and POTS, tend to be increased in remission and relapse respectively.