Impact of various iodine concentrations of iohexol and iodixanol contrast media on image reconstruction techniques in a vascular-specific contrast media phantom: quantitative and qualitative image quality assessment.

PURPOSE: The aim of our study is to investigate the impact of iodine quantification on image reconstruction when employing a vascular-specific contrast media phantom with varying iodine concentrations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 30-cm phantom simulating arterial and venous blood vessel diameters was manufactured. Small (9 mm) and medium (12 mm) cylinders contained iodine concentrations from 10 to 100% while large (21 mm) cylinders were in quartiles from 25 to 100% diluted in blood equivalent medium. Each phantom was filled with either iohexol 350 mgI/mL (Group A) or iodixanol 320 mgI/mL (Group B) and then scanned separately. For each group, tube potential (80-140 kVp) and current (50-400 mAs) were changed and all image series were reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP), hybrid-based iterative reconstruction (HBIR) and model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR). Mean opacification was measured in all groups. All data were compared employing an independent t test and Pearson's correlation. Visual grading characteristic (VGC) and Cohens' kappa analyses were performed. RESULTS: At 80 kVp, mean opacification using HBIR was significantly higher in Group B (2165 ± 1108 HU) than in Group A (2040 ± 1036 HU) (p < 0.009). At 140 kVp, MBIR and HBIR were greater in Group A (1704 ± 1033 HU and 1685 ± 1023 HU) versus Group B (1567 ± 1036 HU and 1567 ± 1034 HU) (p < 0.022). CNR using FBP, HBIR and MBIR was higher in Group B (46 ± 42 HU, 70 ± 163 HU and 83 ± 74 HU, respectively) than in Group A (43 ± 39 HU, 174 ± 130 HU and 80 ± 65 HU, respectively) (p < 0.0001-0.035). Qualitative image analysis demonstrated no difference in Cohen's kappa analysis. VGC was higher in Group A at all image reconstruction groups. CONCLUSION: Iohexol outperforms iodixanol in observer performance when assessing image reconstruction techniques and iodine concentrations in a vascular-specific contrast media phantom.

In Vitro and In Vivo Assessment of Nonionic Iodinated Radiographic Molecules as Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer Magnetic Resonance Imaging Tumor Perfusion Agents.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate 4 nonionic x-ray iodinated contrast agents (CAs), commonly used in radiographic procedures, as novel chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) agents by assessing their in vitro exchange properties and preliminary in vivo use as tumor enhancing agents. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The CEST properties, as function of pH (range, 5.5-7.9) and of radio frequency conditions (irradiation field strength range of 1-9 µT and time of 1-9 seconds), have been determined at 7 T and 310 K for 4 x-ray CAs commonly used in clinical settings, namely, iomeprol, iohexol, ioversol, and iodixanol. Their in vivo properties have been investigated upon intravenous injection in a murine HER2+ breast tumor model (n = 4 mice for each CA) using both computed tomography (CT) and MRI modalities. RESULTS: The prototropic exchange rates measured for the 4 investigated iodinated molecules showed strong pH dependence with base catalyzed exchange rate that was faster for monomeric compounds (20-4000 Hz in the pH range of 5.5-7.9). Computed tomography quantification showed marked (up to 2 mg I/mL concentration) and prolonged accumulation (up to 30 minutes postinjection) inside tumor regions. Among the 4 agents we tested, iohexol and ioversol display good CEST contrast properties at 7 T, and in vivo results confirmed strong and prolonged contrast enhancement of the tumors, with elevated extravasation fractions (74%-91%). A strong and significant correlation was found between CT and CEST-MRI tumor-enhanced images (R = 0.70, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The obtained results demonstrate that iohexol and ioversol, 2 commonly used radiographic compounds, can be used as MRI perfusion agents, particularly useful when serial images acquisitions are needed to complement CT information.

Renal function assessment in child and adolescent heart transplant recipients during routine cardiac catheterization.

CKD identification after pediatric heart transplantation (PHT) is limited by inaccuracies in estimates of GFR. We hypothesized that GFR can be measured by a modified iohexol clearance protocol in PHT recipients and that the CKiD formula provides a better estimate of GFR than other estimating equations. A cross-sectional study of PHT recipients, ages 2-18 yr, undergoing coronary angiography was undertaken. The angiography dose of iohexol was divided by the area under the curve from three iohexol levels post-infusion to calculate GFR. Agreement between iGFR and multiple estimating equations (eGFR) was assessed. In 31 subjects, median age was 15.0 yr (IQR 7.6, 16.6). Mean iGFR was 93.8 (s.d. 22.5) mL/min/1.73 m(2) ; 16 (52%) had an iGFR <90 mL/min/1.73 m(2) . The full CKiD formula (mean eGFR 88.9, s.d. 14.9) had low bias (-5.0), narrowest 95% limits of agreement (-42.0, 32.1), highest 30% (94%) and 10% (52%) accuracy, and highest correlation coefficient (0.576) relative to iGFR. We describe a novel modified iohexol clearance method to assess GFR after PHT. Over half of the cohort had an iGFR <90, suggesting CKD. The full CKiD formula performs best with respect to bias, accuracy, and correlation.

Retention mechanism assessment and method development for the analysis of iohexol and its related compounds in hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography.

Hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC) has emerged in recent years as a valuable alternative to reversed-phase liquid chromatography in the analysis of polar compounds. Research in HILIC is divided into two directions: the assessment of the retention mechanism and retention behavior, and the development of HILIC methods. In this work, four polar neutral analytes (iohexol and its related compounds A, B, and C) were analyzed on two silica and two diol columns in HILIC mode with the aim to investigate thoroughly the retention mechanisms and retention behavior of polar neutral compounds on these four columns. The adsorption and partition contribution to the overall HILIC retention mechanism was investigated by fitting the retention data to linear (adsorption and partition) and nonlinear (mixed-retention and quadratic) theoretical models. On the other hand, the establishment of empirical second-order polynomial retention models on the basis of D-optimal design made possible the estimation of the simultaneous influence of several mobile-phase-related factors. Furthermore, these models were also used as the basis for the application of indirect modeling of the selectivity factor and a grid point search approach in order to achieve the optimal separation of analytes. After the optimization goals had been set, the grids were searched and the optimal conditions were identified. Finally, the optimized method was subjected to validation.

Doxorubicin-loaded drug-eluting beads (DC Bead®) for use in transarterial chemoembolization: a stability assessment.

PURPOSE: Evaluation of doxorubicin stability over time when stored into the DC Bead embolic agent, in various containers, which are used for the delivery of the doxorubicin-loaded beads to the patients for up to 14 days under refrigerated conditions. METHODS: The doxorubicin was loaded through the ionic exchange mechanism into the calibrated polyvinyl alcohol-based hydrogel beads (DC Bead), with the loading process carried out either in the original DC Bead glass vials or within a polypropylene plastic syringe. The loaded samples were eluted at given time points and the extracted doxorubicin was analysed by high-performance liquid chromatography for concentration and chromatographic area response purity. RESULTS: The variance on the doxorubicin concentration of the samples stored in the syringes under refrigerated conditions was less than 10% over the 14 days period. The chromatographic purity of doxorubicin eluted from the DC Bead in their primary glass vial packaging was measured at 99.7%. The dissolution test showed that the elution rate and amount recovered from samples stored in vials were statistically similar between Day 0 and Day 14. The chromatographic purity of the doxorubicin loaded into DC Bead in presence of non-ionic contrast medium was >99.0% for 7 days under refrigerated conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Doxorubicin-loaded DC Bead® are shown to have adequate physicochemical stability over a period of 14 days when stored in syringes or vials under refrigerated conditions for up to 14 days. The admixtures of doxorubicin-loaded beads with contrast medium are stable for up to 7 days under refrigerated conditions.

Cost-effectiveness of iso- versus low-osmolality contrast media in outpatients with high risk of contrast medium-induced nephropathy.

INTRODUCTION: Contrast media can cause acute renal failure by direct toxic effects on the tubular cells and kidney ischemia. Diabetics and hospitalized patients have a greater risk of developing contrast-induced nephropathy than the general population. OBJECTIVE: The cost effectiveness of iso and low-osmolality contrast media was assessed in high risk outpatients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The analysis was based on a systematic literature review comparing the nephrotoxic effects of iso- to low-osmolality contrast media. Only direct costs were considered; these were obtained from the official tariff manual. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, efficiency curves and acceptability curves were calculated. Univariate sensitivity analyses were performed for costs and effects, as well as probabilistic analyses. Zero and 3% discounts were applied to results. The cost-effectiveness threshold was equal to the per capita GDP per life-year gained. RESULTS: Alternatives with Iopamidol and Iodixanol are preferable to the others, because both reduce risk of contrast-induced nephropathy and are less costly. The incremental cost-effectiveness of the Iodixanol alternative compared to the Iopamidol alternative is US$ 14,660 per additional life year gained; this is more than twice the threshold. CONCLUSION: The low-osmolality contrast medium, Iopamidol, appears to be cost-effective when compared with Iohexol or other low-osmolality contrast media (Iopromide, Iobitridol, Iomeprol, Iopentol and Ioxilan) in contrast-induced nephropathy, high-risk outpatients. The choice of the iso-osmolality contrast medium, Iodixanol, depends on its cost per vial and on the willingness to pay.

Cost-effectiveness of iso- versus low-osmolality contrast media in outpatients with high risk of contrast medium-induced nephropathy / Costo-efectividad de medios de contraste isoosmolales e hiposmolales en pacientes con alto riesgo de nefropatía inducida por medio de contraste

Introduction. Contrast media can cause acute renal failure by direct toxic effects on the tubular cells and kidney ischemia. Diabetics and hospitalized patients have a greater risk of developing contrast-induced nephropathy than the general population. Objective. The cost effectiveness of iso and low-osmolality contrast media was assessed in high risk outpatients. Materials and methods. The analysis was based on a systematic literature review comparing the nephrotoxic effects of iso- to low-osmolality contrast media. Only direct costs were considered; these were obtained from the official tariff manual. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, efficiency curves and acceptability curves were calculated. Univariate sensitivity analyses were performed for costs and effects, as well as probabilistic analyses. Zero and 3% discounts were applied to results. The cost-effectiveness threshold was equal to the per capita GDP per life-year gained. Results. Alternatives with Iopamidol and Iodixanol are preferable to the others, because both reduce risk of contrast-induced nephropathy and are less costly. The incremental cost-effectiveness of the Iodixanol alternative compared to the Iopamidol alternative is US$ 14,660 per additional life year gained; this is more than twice the threshold. Conclusion. The low-osmolality contrast medium, Iopamidol, appears to be cost-effective when compared with Iohexol or other low-osmolality contrast media (Iopromide, Iobitridol, Iomeprol, Iopentol and Ioxilan) in contrast-induced nephropathy, high-risk outpatients. The choice of the iso-osmolality contrast medium, Iodixanol, depends on its cost per vial and on the willingness to pay.

Introducción. Los medios de contraste pueden provocar falla renal aguda por toxicidad directa sobre las células tubulares e isquemia medular renal. Los pacientes diabéticos y los hospitalizados presentan mayor riesgo de desarrollar nefropatía inducida por medios de contraste que la población general. Objetivo. Establecer el costo-efectividad de los medios de contraste isosmolales e hiposmolales en pacientes con alto riesgo. Materiales and métodos. El análisis se basó en una revisión sistemática de la literatura científica, comparando los efectos nefrotóxicos de los medios isosmolales e hipoosmolales. Se consideraron sólo los costos directos, obtenidos del manual tarifario. Se calcularon las tasas del incremento del costo-efectividad, las curvas de eficiencia y de aceptabilidad. Se hicieron análisis univariados de sensibilidad para costos y efectos, así como probabilísticos. Se aplicaron tasas de descuento de 0 y 3 % a los resultados. Se usó como umbral de costo-efectividad por año de vida ganado, el producto interno bruto per cápita. Resultados. Las alternativas con Iopamidol y Iodixanol dominan a las demás porque reducen el riesgo de nefropatía inducida por contraste a un menor costo. La razón del incremento del costo-efectividad del iodixanol comparado con el iopamidol es de US$ 14.660 por año de vida ganado que más que duplica el umbral. Conclusión. El medio de baja osmolalidad, iopamidol, parece ser costo-efectivo comparado con iohexol u otros medios hiposmolares (iopromide, iobitridol, iomeprol, iopentol y ioxilan), en pacientes con alto riesgo de nefropatía inducida por contraste. La elección del medio hiposmolar, depende de la disponibilidad a pagar o del costo por ampolleta.

Development and evaluation of a liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry assay and its application for the assessment of renal function.

In the present study we evaluated two commonly used iodinated contrast agents, iohexol and iodixanol, as potential markers of impaired renal function. A reversed phase LC-MS method has been developed in order to separate and quantify the two substances. The assay was linear between 0.02 and 9.7 micromol/L for iohexol and between 0.4 and 49.3 micromol/L for iodixanol (r(2) > 0.998). The recovery during sample preparation ranged from 89.1 to 112.4%. The intra- and inter-assay RSD values were 3.06-13.6% for iohexol and 4.32-12.7% for iodixanol. The validated method was subsequently applied to 17 patients scheduled for angiographic procedure displaying normal and impaired renal function. A mixture of iohexol and iodixanol was intra-arterially injected and their corresponding plasma levels were determined periodically over a 24h period following administration. The elimination of both contrast agents followed by the LC-MS approach allowed us to discriminate between patients with normal and impaired renal function at 4, 8 and 24h after administration. Our preliminary results support the predictive value of iohexol and/or iodixanol clearance in a clinical environment to screen and identify patients at risk of developing CIN.

Comparative tolerability of contrast media used for coronary interventions.

Radiographic contrast media (CM) are necessary to provide x-ray absorption of the bloodstream; all other observed effects need to be regarded as adverse. Four types of CM are currently used in diagnostic and interventional cardiology: ionic high-osmolar CM (HOCM), either ionic or non-ionic low-osmolar CM (LOCM), and non-ionic iso-osmolar CM (IOCM). Focusing on the potential cardiovascular effects caused by the CM, there is a clear difference between HOCM and the LOCM or IOCM. HOCM have a poorer profile due to a higher incidence of hypotension and electrophysiological effects. To prevent contrast-induced nephropathy, HOCM should be avoided and patients should receive the minimal dose of LOCM or IOCM with intravenous hydration before and after the procedure. Clinical hyperthyroidism has been detected after CM use, but the condition appears, ultimately, to be self-limited and to occur mainly in elderly patients. When assessing the need for a CM in terms of improved patient safety, preventing serious complications should be the major factor determining the choice. CM should not be selected on the basis of minor adverse effects since these are, ultimately, of low clinical relevance. Thrombotic events, in contrast, carry a high clinical relevance and we consider that these should be the main issue governing current choice. Ionic LOCM appear to have better profile than other CM with respect to interaction with platelet function and coagulation. In relation to thrombotic events in randomised clinical studies, ionic CM have been associated, mainly, with favourable and some neutral results compared with non-ionic agents. Only one trial indicated a more pronounced antithrombotic effect of the non-ionic IOCM relative to the ionic LOCM. The antithrombotic advantages of ionic over non-ionic LOCM are, in part, balanced by a greater frequency of minor adverse effects such as nausea, vomiting or cutaneous rashes. A matter of concern is the delayed adverse effects observed with non-ionic IOCM. However, severe and life-threatening reactions are exceptional and there are probably no significant differences between IOCM and LOCM whether ionic or non-ionic. However, in patients with known allergies, non-ionic CM are to be recommended. On the basis of the available pre-clinical and clinical data, the ionic LOCM or the non-ionic IOCM are the agents to be recommended in percutaneous coronary interventions because of their antithrombotic advantages over non-ionic LOCM.

Environmental risk assessment for the widely used iodinated X-ray contrast agent iopromide (Ultravist).

Iodinated X-ray contrast media are diagnostic pharmaceuticals that are applied to enhance the contrast between organs or vessels examined and surrounding tissues during radiography. These substances are applied in doses up to ca. 200 g per person (corresponding to approx 100 g iodine) and are rapidly excreted. In the sewage system they contribute to the burden of adsorbable organic halogens (AOX). To assess the potential environmental impact of this release, studies on environmental fate and effects were conducted for a risk assessment of the frequently used X-ray contrast medium iopromide (brand name: Ultravist). A screening test for biological degradation (OECD Screening Test 301 E) led to iopromide being classified as not readily biodegradable. Therefore, the predicted environmental concentration (PEC) in surface water was calculated in a first step. The resulting concentration of 2 microgram/liter was then compared in a second step with the predicted no-effect concentration as derived from a battery of ecotoxicity tests. In short-term toxicity tests with bacteria (Vibrio fisheri, Pseudomonas putida), algae (Scenedesmus subspicatus), crustaceans (Daphnia magna), and fish (Danio rerio, Leuciscus idus) no toxic effects were detected at the highest tested concentration of 10 g/liter. In a chronic toxicity test with D. magna no effect was observed at the highest tested concentration of 1 g/liter. Using an assessment factor of 100 the ratio between the predicted environmental concentration (PEC) and the predicted no-effect concentration (PNEC) was calculated to be