Assessment of Isoniazid Preventive Therapy and Incidence of Tuberculosis among People Living with Human Immunodeficiency Virus Seeking Care in an Anti-retroviral Therapy Center, Puducherry.

BACKGROUND: One in three deaths among people living with human immunodeficiency virus (PLHIV) is due to Tuberculosis. Isoniazid preventive therapy (IPT) was implemented in antiretroviral therapy (ART) center Puducherry in July 2017. OBJECTIVES: We have determined the proportion of PLHIV who were eligible, initiated, completed IPT and also the incidence of tuberculosis before and after implementation of IPT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: It was a facility based longitudinal descriptive study. All PLHIV, aged 10 years and above, seeking care in ART Centers was included. The number of PLHIV eligible, initiated and completed IPT was summarized as proportion with 95% CI. RESULTS: Among the registered PLHIV (999), the proportion of PLHIV those were found eligible for IPT was 93% [95% CI (91.24%-94.67%)] and initiated on IPT was 92% [95% CI (90.20%-93.95%)]. Completion rate of IPT was 96.3% [95% CI (94.59%-97.63%)]. CONCLUSION: Initiation of IPT was relatively less among newly registered PLHIV as compared to older cohort of PLHIV.

Cost-effectiveness of latent tuberculosis infection testing and treatment with 6-week regimen among key population in rural communities in China: a decision analysis study.

PURPOSE: Several model studies suggested the implementation of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) testing and treatment could greatly reduce the incidence of tuberculosis (TB) and achieve the 2035 target of the "End TB" Strategy in China. The present study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of LTBI testing and TB preventive treatment among key population (≥ 50 years old) susceptible to TB at community level in China. METHODS: A Markov model was developed to investigate the cost-effectiveness of LTBI testing using interferon gamma release assay (IGRA) and subsequent treatment with 6-month daily isoniazid regimen (6H) (as a standard regimen for comparison) or 6-week twice-weekly rifapentine and isoniazid regimen (6-week H2P2) in a cohort of 10,000 adults with an average initial age of 50 years. RESULTS: In the base-case analysis, LTBI testing and treatment with 6H was dominated (i.e., more expensive with a lower quality-adjusted life year (QALY)) by LTBI testing and treatment with 6-week H2P2. LTBI testing and treatment with 6-week H2P2 was more effective than no intervention at a cost of $20,943.81 per QALY gained, which was below the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $24,211.84 per QALY gained in China. The one-way sensitivity analysis showed the change of LTBI prevalence was the parameter that most influenced the results of the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). CONCLUSION: As estimated by a Markov model, LTBI testing and treatment with 6-week H2P2 was cost-saving compared with LTBI testing and treatment with 6H, and it was considered to be a cost-effective option for TB control in rural China.

Cost-effectiveness of interferon-γ release assay for screening of latent tuberculosis infection in individuals with schizophrenia.

Schizophrenia is recognized as a significant risk factor for tuberculosis (TB). This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of interferon-γ release assay (IGRA) with preventive treatment for screening of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) in individuals with schizophrenia. A state transition model was developed from a healthcare payer perspective on a lifetime horizon. Ten strategies were compared by combining two different tests for LTBI, i.e. IGRA and tuberculin skin test (TST), and five different preventive treatments, i.e. 9-month isoniazid (9H), 3-month isoniazid and rifapentine (3HP) by directly observed therapy, 3HP by self-administered therapy, 3-month isoniazid and rifampin (3RH), and 4-month rifampin (4R). The main outcomes were costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), life expectancy life-years (LYs), incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, drug-sensitive tuberculosis (DS-TB) cases, and TB-related deaths. For both bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG)-vaccinated and non-BCG-vaccinated individuals, IGRA with 4R was the most cost-effective and TST with 3RH was the least effective. Among schizophrenic individuals in Japan, IGRA with 4R saved US$17.8 million, increased 58,981 QALYs and 935 LYs, and prevented 222 DS-TB cases and 75 TB-related deaths compared with TST with 3RH. In individuals with schizophrenia, IGRA with 4R is recommended for LTBI screening with preventive treatment to reduce costs, morbidity, and mortality from TB.

Pharmacokinetic assessment of rifampicin and des-acetyl rifampicin in carbon tetrachloride induced liver injury model in Wistar rats.

OBJECTIVES: Preclinical evidence is needed to assess drug-metabolite behaviour in compromised liver function for developing the best antitubercular treatment (ATT) re-introduction regimen in drug-induced liver injury (DILI). The pharmacokinetic behavior of rifampicin (RMP) and its active metabolite des-acetyl-rifampicin (DARP) in DILI's presence is unknown. To study the pharmacokinetic behavior of RMP and DARP in the presence of carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) plus ATT-DILI in rats. METHODS: Thirty rats used in the experiment were divided equally into six groups. We administered a single 0.5 mL/kg CCl4 intraperitoneal injection in all rats. Groups II, III, IV, and V were started on daily oral RMP alone, RMP plus isoniazid (INH), RMP plus pyrazinamide (PZA), and the three drugs INH, RMP, and PZA together, respectively, for 21-days subsequently. Pharmacokinetic (PK) sampling was performed at 0, 0.5, 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 h post-dosing on day 20. We monitored LFT at baseline on days-1, 7, and 21 and sacrificed the rats on the last day of the experiment. RESULTS: ATT treatment sustained the CCl4-induced liver injury changes. A significant rise in mean total bilirubin levels was observed in groups administered rifampicin. The triple drug combination group demonstrated 1.43- and 1.84-times higher area-under-the-curve values of RMP (234.56±30.66 vs. 163.55±36.14 µg h/mL) and DARP (16.15±4.50 vs. 8.75±2.79 µg h/mL) compared to RMP alone group. Histological and oxidative stress changes supported underlying liver injury and PK alterations. CONCLUSIONS: RMP metabolism inhibition by PZA, more than isoniazid, was well preserved in the presence of underlying liver injury.

Financial incentives for reduced alcohol use and increased isoniazid adherence during tuberculosis preventive therapy among people with HIV in Uganda: an open-label, factorial randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Alcohol use is common among people with HIV and is a risk factor for tuberculosis disease and non-adherence to isoniazid preventive therapy (IPT). Few interventions exist to reduce alcohol use and increase IPT adherence in sub-Saharan Africa. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that financial incentives conditional on point-of-care negative urine alcohol biomarker testing and positive urine isoniazid testing would reduce alcohol use and increase isoniazid adherence, respectively, in people with HIV who have latent tuberculosis infection and hazardous alcohol use. METHODS: We conducted an open-label, 2×2 factorial randomised controlled trial in Uganda. Eligible for the study were non-pregnant HIV-positive adults (aged ≥18 years) prescribed antiretroviral therapy for at least 6 months, with current heavy alcohol use confirmed by urine ethyl glucuronide (biomarker of recent alcohol use) and a positive Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Consumption (AUDIT-C; ≥3 for women, ≥4 for men) for the past 3 months' drinking, no history of active tuberculosis, tuberculosis treatment, or tuberculosis preventive therapy, and a positive tuberculin skin test. We randomly assigned participants (1:1:1:1) initiating 6 months of IPT to: no incentives (group 1); or incentives for recent alcohol abstinence (group 2), isoniazid adherence (group 3), or both (group 4). Escalating incentives were contingent on monthly point-of-care urine tests negative for ethyl glucuronide (groups 2 and 4), or positive on IsoScreen (biomarker of recent isoniazid use; groups 3 and 4). The primary alcohol outcome was non-hazardous use by self-report (AUDIT-C <3 for women, <4 for men) and phosphatidylethanol (PEth; past-month alcohol biomarker) <35 ng/mL at 3 months and 6 months. The primary isoniazid adherence outcome was more than 90% bottle opening of days prescribed. We performed intention-to-treat analyses. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03492216), and is complete. FINDINGS: From April 16, 2018, to Aug 2, 2021, 5508 people were screened, of whom 680 were randomly assigned: 169 to group 1, 169 to group 2, 170 to group 3, and 172 to group 4. The median age of participants was 39 years (IQR 32-47), 470 (69%) were male, 598 (90%) of 663 had HIV RNA viral loads of less than 40 copies per mL, median AUDIT-C score was 6 (IQR 4-8), and median PEth was 252 ng/mL (IQR 87-579). Among 636 participants who completed the trial with alcohol use endpoint measures (group 1: 152, group 2: 159, group 3: 161, group 4: 164), non-hazardous alcohol use was more likely in the groups with incentives for alcohol abstinence (groups 2 and 4) versus no alcohol incentives (groups 1 and 3): 57 (17·6%) of 323 versus 31 (9·9%) of 313, respectively; adjusted risk difference (aRD) 7·6% (95% CI 2·7 to 12·5, p=0·0025). Among 656 participants who completed the trial with isoniazid adherence endpoint measures (group 1: 158, group 2: 163, group 3: 168, group 4: 167), incentives for isoniazid adherence did not increase adherence: 244 (72·8%) of 335 in the isoniazid incentive groups (groups 3 and 4) versus 234 (72·9%) of 321 in the no isoniazid incentive groups (groups 1 and 2); aRD -0·2% (95% CI -7·0 to 6·5, p=0·94). Overall, 53 (8%) of 680 participants discontinued isoniazid due to grade 3 or higher adverse events. There was no significant association between randomisation group and hepatotoxicity resulting in isoniazid discontinuation, after adjusting for sex and site. INTERPRETATION: Escalating financial incentives contingent on recent alcohol abstinence led to significantly lower biomarker-confirmed alcohol use versus control, but incentives for recent isoniazid adherence did not lead to changes in adherence. The alcohol intervention was efficacious despite less intensive frequency of incentives and clinic visits than traditional programmes for substance use, suggesting that pragmatic modifications of contingency management for resource-limited settings can have efficacy and that further evaluation of implementation is merited. FUNDING: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. TRANSLATION: For the Runyankole translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Understanding patient-level costs of weekly isoniazid-rifapentine (3HP) among people living with HIV in Uganda.

BACKGROUND: Twelve weeks of weekly isoniazid and rifapentine (3HP) prevents TB disease among people with HIV (PWH), but the costs to people of taking TB preventive treatment is not well described.METHODS: We surveyed PWH who initiated 3HP at a large urban HIV/AIDS clinic in Kampala, Uganda, as part of a larger trial. We estimated the cost of one 3HP visit from the patient perspective, including both out-of-pocket costs and estimated lost wages. Costs were reported in 2021 Ugandan shillings (UGX) and US dollars (USD; USD1 = UGX3,587)RESULTS: The survey included 1,655 PWH. The median participant cost of one clinic visit was UGX19,200 (USD5.36), or 38.5% of the median weekly income. Per visit, the cost of transportation was the largest component (median: UGX10,000/USD2.79), followed by lost income (median: UGX4,200/USD1.16) and food (median: UGX2,000/USD0.56). Men reported greater income loss than women (median: UGX6,400/USD1.79 vs. UGX3,300/USD0.93), and participants who lived further than a 30-minute drive to the clinic had higher transportation costs than others (median: UGX14,000/USD3.90 vs. UGX8,000/USD2.23).CONCLUSION: Patient-level costs to receive 3HP accounted for over one-third of weekly income. Patient-centered approaches to averting or defraying these costs are needed.

Scale-Up of Rifapentine and Isoniazid for Tuberculosis Prevention Among Household Contacts in 2 Urban Centers: An Effectiveness Assessment.

BACKGROUND: Scaling up a shorter preventive regimen such as weekly isoniazid and rifapentine (3HP) for 3 months is a priority for tuberculosis (TB) preventive treatment (TPT). However, there are limited data on 3HP acceptability and completion from high-burden-TB countries. METHODS: We scaled up 3HP from 2018 to 2021 in 2 cities in Pakistan. Eligible participants were household contacts of persons diagnosed with TB disease. Participants were prescribed 3HP after ruling out TB disease. Treatment was self-administered. We analyzed the proportion who completed 3HP. RESULTS: In Karachi, we verbally screened 22 054 household contacts of all ages. Of these, 83% were clinically evaluated and 3% were diagnosed with TB. Of household contacts without TB disease, 59% initiated the 3HP regimen, of which 69% completed treatment. In Peshawar, we verbally screened 6389 household contacts of all ages. We evaluated 95% of household contacts, of whom 2% were diagnosed with TB disease. Among those without TB disease, 65% initiated 3HP, of which 93% completed. Factors associated with higher 3HP completion included residence in Peshawar (risk ratio [RR], 1.35 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 1.32-1.37]), index patient being a male (RR, 1.03 [95% CI: 1.01-1.05]), and index patient with extrapulmonary TB compared to bacteriologically positive pulmonary TB (RR, 1.10 [95% CI: 1.06-1.14]). The age of the index patient was inversely associated with completion. CONCLUSIONS: We observed a high level of acceptance and completion of 3HP in programs implemented in 2 cities in Pakistan, with differences observed across the cities. These findings suggest that 3HP can be effectively scaled up in urban settings to improve the reach and impact of TPT.

Cost-effectiveness of 3-months isoniazid and rifapentine compared to 9-months isoniazid for latent tuberculosis infection: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: We conducted a systematic review examining the cost effectiveness of a 3-month course of isoniazid and rifapentine, known as 3HP, given by directly observed treatment, compared to 9 months of isoniazid that is directly observed or self-administered, for latent tuberculosis infection. 3HP has shown to be effective in reducing progression to active tuberculosis and like other short-course regimens, has higher treatment completion rates compared to standard regimens such as 9 months of isoniazid. Decision makers would benefit from knowing if the higher up-front costs of rifapentine and of the human resources needed for directly observed treatment are worth the investment for improved outcomes. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, LILACS, and Web of Science up to February 2022 with search concepts combining latent tuberculosis infection, directly observed treatment, and cost or cost-effectiveness. Studies included were in English or French, on human subjects, with latent tuberculosis infection, provided information on specified anti-tubercular therapy regimens, had a directly observed treatment arm, and described outcomes with some cost or economic data. We excluded posters and abstracts, treatment for multiple drug resistant tuberculosis, and combined testing and treatment strategies. We then restricted our findings to studies examining directly-observed 3HP for comparison. The primary outcome was the cost and cost-effectiveness of directly-observed 3HP. RESULTS: We identified 3 costing studies and 7 cost-effectiveness studies. The 3 costing studies compared directly-observed 3HP to directly-observed 9 months of isoniazid. Of the 7 cost-effectiveness studies, 4 were modelling studies based in high-income countries; one study was modelled on a high tuberculosis incidence population in the Canadian Arctic, using empiric costing data from that setting; and 2 studies were conducted in a low-income, high HIV-coinfection rate population. In five studies, directly-observed 3HP compared to self-administered isoniazid for 9 months in high-income countries, has incremental cost-effectiveness ratios that range from cost-saving to $5418 USD/QALY gained. While limited, existing evidence suggests 3HP may not be cost-effective in low-income, high HIV-coinfection settings. CONCLUSION: Cost-effectiveness should continue to be assessed for programmatic planning and scale-up, and may vary depending on existing systems and local context, including prevalence rates and patient expectations and preferences.

Assessment of contextual factors shaping delivery and uptake of isoniazid preventive therapy among people living with HIV in Dar es salaam, Tanzania.

BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis has remained a leading cause of death among people living with HIV (PLHIV) globally. Isoniazid preventive therapy (IPT) is the recommended strategy by the World Health Organization to prevent TB disease and related deaths among PLHIV. However, delivery and uptake of IPT has remained suboptimal particularly in countries where HIV and TB are endemic such as Tanzania. This study sought to assess contextual factors that shape delivery and uptake of IPT in Dar es Salaam region, Tanzania. METHODOLOGY: We employed a qualitative case study design comprising of in-depth interviews with people living with HIV (n = 17), as well as key informant interviews with clinicians (n = 7) and health administrators (n = 7). We used thematic data analysis approach and reporting of the results was guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). RESULTS: Characteristics of IPT such as aligning the therapy to individual patient schedules and its relatively low cost facilitated its delivery and uptake. On the contrary, perceived adverse side effects negatively affected the delivery and uptake of IPT. Characteristics of individuals delivering the therapy including their knowledge, good attitudes, and commitment to meeting set targets facilitated the delivery and uptake of IPT. The process of IPT delivery comprised collective planning and collaboration among various facilities which facilitated its delivery and uptake. Organisational characteristics including communication among units and supportive leadership facilitated the delivery and uptake of IPT. External system factors including HIV stigma, negative cultural and religious values, limited funding as well as shortage of skilled healthcare workers presented as barriers to the delivery and uptake of IPT. CONCLUSION: The factors influencing the delivery and uptake of IPT among people living with HIV are multifaceted and exist at different levels of the health system. Therefore, it is imperative that IPT program implementers and policy makers adopt multilevel approaches that address the identified barriers and leverage the facilitators in delivery and uptake of IPT at both community and health system levels.

Re-evaluating the health impact and cost-effectiveness of tuberculosis preventive treatment for modern HIV cohorts on antiretroviral therapy: a modelling analysis using data from Tanzania.

BACKGROUND: Isoniazid preventive therapy (IPT) can prevent tuberculosis among people receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART). HIV programmes are now initiating patients on ART with higher average CD4 cell counts and lower tuberculosis risks under test-and-treat guidelines. We aimed to investigate how this change has affected the health impact and cost-effectiveness of IPT. METHODS: We constructed a tuberculosis-HIV microsimulation model parameterised using data from a large HIV treatment programme in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. We simulated long-term health and cost outcomes for the 211 748 individuals initiating ART between Jan 1, 2014, and Dec 31, 2020, under three scenarios: no IPT access; observed levels of IPT access (75%) and completion (71%); and full (100%) IPT access and completion. We stratified results by ART initiation year and starting CD4 cell count. FINDINGS: Observed levels of IPT access were estimated to have averted 12 800 (95% uncertainty interval 7300 to 21 600) disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) and saved US$23 000 (-2 268 000 to 1 388 000). Full IPT access would have averted 24 500 (15 100 to 38 300) DALYs and cost $825 000 (-1 594 000 to 4 751 000), equivalent to $23·4 per DALY averted. Lifetime health benefits of IPT were estimated to be greater for more recent ART cohorts, while lifetime costs were stable. In subgroup analyses, a higher CD4 cell count at ART initiation was associated with greater health gains from IPT (15 900 [10 300 to 22 500] DALYs averted by full IPT per 100 000 patients for CD4 count >500 cells per µL at ART initiation, versus 7400 [4500 to 11 600] for CD4 count <100 cells per µL) and lower incremental lifetime costs. INTERPRETATION: IPT remains highly cost-effective or cost-saving for recent ART cohorts. The health impact and cost-effectiveness of IPT are estimated to improve as patients initiate ART earlier in the course of infection. FUNDING: US National Institutes of Health.

Costs of Tuberculosis at 3 Treatment Centers, Canada, 2010-2016.

We estimated costs of managing different forms of tuberculosis (TB) across Canada by conducting a retrospective chart review and cost assessment of patients treated for TB infection, drug-susceptible TB (DS TB), isoniazid-resistant TB, or multidrug-resistant TB (MDR TB) at 3 treatment centers. We included 90 patients each with TB infection and DS TB, 71 with isoniazid-resistant TB, and 62 with MDR TB. Median per-patient costs for TB infection (in 2020 Canadian dollars) were $804 (interquartile range [IQR] $587-$1,205), for DS TB $12,148 (IQR $4,388-$24,842), for isoniazid-resistant TB $19,319 (IQR $7,117-$41,318), and for MDR TB $119,014 (IQR $80,642-$164,015). Compared with costs for managing DS TB, costs were 11.1 (95% CI 9.1-14.3) times lower for TB infection, 1.7 (95% CI 1.3-2.1) times higher for isoniazid-resistant TB, and 8.1 (95% CI 6.1-10.6) times higher for MDR TB. Broadened TB infection treatment could avert high costs associated with managing TB disease.

Drug resistant TB - latest developments in epidemiology, diagnostics and management.

AIM: The aim of this review is to inform the reader on the latest developments in epidemiology, diagnostics and management. EPIDEMIOLOGY: Drug-resistant Tuberculosis (DR-TB) continues to be a current global health threat, and is defined by higher morbidity and mortality, sequelae, higher cost and complexity. The WHO classifies drug-resistant TB into 5 categories: isoniazid-resistant TB, rifampicin resistant (RR)-TB and MDR-TB, (TB resistant to isoniazid and rifampicin), pre-extensively drug-resistant TB (pre-XDR-TB) which is MDR-TB with resistance to a fluoroquinolone and finally XDR-TB that is TB resistant to rifampicin, plus any fluoroquinolone, plus at least one further priority A drug (bedaquiline or linezolid). Of 500,000 estimated new cases of RR-TB in 2020, only 157 903 cases are notified. Only about a third of cases are detected and treated annually. DIAGNOSTICS: Recently newer rapid diagnostic methods like the GeneXpert, whole genome sequencing and Myc-TB offer solutions for rapid detection of resistance. TREATMENT: The availability of new TB drugs and shorter treatment regimens have been recommended for the management of DR-TB. CONCLUSION: Despite advances in diagnostics and treatments we still have to find and treat two thirds of the drug resistant cases that go undetected and therefore go untreated each year. Control of TB and elimination will only occur if cases are detected, diagnosed and treated promptly.

Assessment of the efficacy of clofazimine alone and in combination with primary agents against Mycobacterium tuberculosis in vitro.

OBJECTIVES: The chemotherapeutic regimens of patients with drug-susceptible (DS)- tuberculosis (TB) comprise four primary anti-TB drugs: rifampicin (RMP), isoniazid (INH), ethambutol (EMB) and pyrazinamide (PZA), administered for six-to-nine months. These drug regimens target the various microbial populations that include actively replicating (AR), slow-replicating (SR) and non-replicating (NR) organisms. Clofazimine (CFZ) has showed benefit in shortening DS-TB treatment in vivo from six to four months when used in combination with this regimen in murine models of experimental infection. However, its antimicrobial efficacy when used in combination with the primary drugs against the various microbial populations of Mycobacterium tuberculosis has not been demonstrated. METHODS: In the current in vitro study, the inhibitory and bactericidal activities of CFZ in combination with the primary anti-TB drugs, RMP, INH and EMB against the AR and SR organisms in planktonic and biofilm-forming cultures, respectively, were evaluated by fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) and fractional bactericidal concentration index (FBCI) determinations, using the Loewe Additivity Model. RESULTS: In planktonic cultures, CFZ demonstrated synergistic growth inhibitory activity in combination with RMP and INH individually and collectively. With respect to bactericidal activity, CFZ exhibited synergistic activity only in a two-drug combination with RMP. However, in biofilm-forming cultures, all CFZ-containing anti-TB drug combinations exhibited synergistic inhibitory and bactericidal effects, particularly in combination with RIF and INH. CONCLUSION: Clofazimine exhibited synergistic effects in combination with primary anti-TB drugs against both planktonic and biofilm-forming cultures, showing potential benefit in augmenting treatment outcome when used during standard TB chemotherapy.

Assessment of Factors Associated with Unfavorable Outcomes among Drug-Resistant TB Patients: A 6-Year Retrospective Study from Pakistan.

The spread of drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR TB) poses significant challenges to the control and successful eradication of TB globally. The current retrospective study was designed to evaluate the treatment outcomes and identify the risk factors associated with unsuccessful outcomes among DR TB patients. A total of 277/308 eligible DR TB patients were enrolled for treatment at the programmatic management unit of DR TB at the Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences, Islamabad between January 2014 and July 2019. Treatment outcomes were defined according to the WHO recommendations. Death, treatment failure, and lost to follow-up (LTFU) were collectively grouped as unsuccessful treatment outcomes, whereas cured and treatment completed were summed up together as successful treatment outcomes. Out of the total 277 patients, 265 (95.67%) were multidrug/rifampicin-resistant TB (MDR/RR-TB) cases, 8 (2.89%) were isoniazid resistant cases, and 4 (1.44%) were extensively drug-resistant ones. In the current cohort, a total of 177 (63.9%) achieved successful treatment outcomes. Among them, 153 (55.2%) were declared cured and 24 (8.7%) completed their treatment. Of the remaining 100 (36.1%) patients with unsuccessful outcomes, 60 (21.7%) died, 32 (11.5%) were LTFU, and 8 (2.9%) had failed treatment. The proportion of male patients was relatively higher (55.2%), within the age group of 21-40 years (47.3%) and lived in rural areas (66.8%). The multivariate analysis revealed that unsuccessful outcomes had a statistically significant association with being male (adjusted odds ratio, AOR: 1.92, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.10-3.36), being in an age group above 60 years (AOR: 3.34, 95% CI: 1.09-10.1), suffering from any comorbidity (AOR: 2.69, 95% CI: 1.35-5.38), and the history of use of second-line drugs (AOR; 3.51, 95% CI 1.35-9.12). In conclusion, treatment outcomes among DR TB patients at the study site were poor and did not achieve the treatment success target (≥75%) set by the World Health Organization.

Factors Associated With Latent Tuberculosis Infection Treatment Failure Among Patients With Commercial Health Insurance-United States, 2005-2016.

CONTEXT: Approximately 80% of US tuberculosis (TB) cases verified during 2015-2016 were attributed to untreated latent TB infection (LTBI). Identifying factors associated with LTBI treatment failure might improve treatment effectiveness. OBJECTIVE: To identify patients with indicators of isoniazid (INH) LTBI treatment initiation, completion, and failure. METHODS: We searched inpatient and outpatient claims for International Classification of Diseases (Ninth and Tenth Revisions), National Drug, and Current Procedural Terminology codes. We defined treatment completion as 180 days or more of INH therapy during a 9-month period. We defined LTBI treatment failure as an active TB disease diagnosis more than 1 year after starting LTBI treatment among completers and used exact logistic regression to model possible differences between groups. Among treatment completers, we matched 1 patient who failed treatment with 2 control subjects and fit regression models with covariates documented on medical claims paid 6 months or less before INH treatment initiation. PARTICIPANTS: Commercially insured US patients in a large commercial database with insurance claims paid during 2005-2016. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: (1) Trends in treatment completion; (2) odds ratios (ORs) for factors associated with treatment completion and treatment failure. RESULTS: Of 21 510 persons who began LTBI therapy during 2005-2016, 10 725 (49.9%) completed therapy. Treatment noncompletion is associated with those younger than 45 years, living in the Northeast or South Census regions, and women. Among persons who completed treatment, 30 (0.3%) progressed to TB disease. Diagnoses of rheumatoid arthritis during the 6 months before treatment initiation and being aged 65 years or older (reference: ages 0-24 years) were significantly associated with INH LTBI treatment failure (adjusted exact OR = 5.1; 95% CI, 1.2-28.2; and adjusted exact OR = 5.1; 95% CI, 1.2-25.3, respectively). CONCLUSION: Approximately 50% of persons completed INH LTBI therapy, and of those, treatment failure was associated with rheumatoid arthritis and persons 65 years or older among a cohort of US LTBI patients with commercial health insurance.

Dual antitubercular drug loaded liposomes for macrophage targeting: development, characterisation, ex vivo and in vivo assessment.

AIM: The present study was conducted to formulate and investigate liposomes for the dual drug delivery based on anti-tubercular drug(s) combination i.e. Isoniazid (INH) and Rifampicin (RIF). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Mannosylated and non mannosylated liposomes were prepared by lipid thin film hydration method, using DSPC: Chol at a molar ratio 6:4 while in case of mannosylated liposomes DSPC: Chol: Man-C4-Chol at a molar ratio 6.0:3.5:0.5 were used and extensively characterised. The particle size and zeta potential were recorded to be 1.29 ± 0.24 µm and -9.1 ± 0.11 mV. The drug entrapment (%) was recorded to be 84.7 ± 1.25% for Rifampicin and 31.8 ± 0.12% for Isoniazid. RESULTS: The antitubercular activity studied in Balb/C mice was maximum in the case of mannosylated liposomes. The biodistribution studies also revealed higher drug(s) concentration (accumulation) maintained over a protracted period. CONCLUSIONS: The liposomal preparations are passively as well as actively uptaken by the alveolar macrophages which are the cellular tropics of infection. The mannosylated liposomes appear to be a potential carrier for dual drug delivery and targeted antitubercular therapy.

Cost of Delivering 12-Dose Isoniazid and Rifapentine Versus 6 Months of Isoniazid for Tuberculosis Infection in a High-Burden Setting.

BACKGROUND: Successful delivery and completion of tuberculosis preventive treatment are necessary for tuberculosis elimination. Shorter preventive treatment regimens currently have higher medication costs, but patients spend less time in care and are more likely to complete treatment. It is unknown how economic costs of successful delivery differ between longer and shorter regimens in high-tuberculosis-burden settings. METHODS: We developed survey instruments to collect costs from program and patient sources, considering costs incurred from when household contacts first entered the health system. We compared the cost per completed course of preventive treatment with either 6 months of daily isoniazid (6H) or 3 months of weekly isoniazid and rifapentine (3HP), delivered by the Indus Health Network tuberculosis program in Karachi, Pakistan, between October 2016 and February 2018. RESULTS: During this period, 459 individuals initiated 6H and 643 initiated 3HP; 39% and 61% completed treatment, respectively. Considering costs to both the program and care recipients, the cost per completed course was 394 US dollars (USD) for 6H and 333 USD for 3HP. Using a new 2020 price for rifapentine reduced the cost per completed course of 3HP to 290 USD. Under varying assumptions about drug prices and costs incurred by care recipients, the cost per completed course was lower for 3HP in all scenarios, and the largest cost drivers were the salaries of clinical staff. CONCLUSIONS: In a high-burden setting, the cost of successful delivery of 3HP was lower than that of 6H, driven by higher completion.

Urine Biomarker Assessment of Infant Adherence to Isoniazid Prophylaxis.

We assessed adherence in an infant tuberculosis prevention trial in Kenya with a urine isoniazid metabolite-detecting dipstick. Ninety-seven infants had 155 assays performed; 77 (49.7%) were found to be positive despite caregiver-reported adherence. Positive assays were associated with maternal secondary education, HIV suppression and no reported missed doses in past 3 days, suggesting caregiver education and self-medication use influenced infant adherence.

Interferon gamma release assay tests are associated with persistence and completion of latent tuberculosis infection treatment in the United States: Evidence from commercial insurance data.

BACKGROUND: Risk-targeted testing and treatment of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) is a critical component of the United States' (US) tuberculosis (TB) elimination strategy, but relatively low treatment completion rates remain a challenge. Both treatment persistence and completion may be facilitated by diagnosing LTBI using interferon gamma release assays (IGRA) rather than tuberculin skin tests (TST). METHODS: We used a national sample of administrative claims data to explore associations diagnostic test choice (TST, IGRA, TST with subsequent IGRA) and treatment persistence and completion in persons initiating a daily dose isoniazid LTBI treatment regimen in the US private healthcare sector between July 2011 and March 2014. Associations were analyzed with a generalized ordered logit model (completion) and a negative binomial regression model (persistence). RESULTS: Of 662 persons initiating treatment, 327 (49.4%) completed at least the 6-month regimen and 173 (26.1%) completed the 9-month regimen; 129 (19.5%) persisted in treatment one month or less. Six-month completion was least likely in persons receiving a TST (42.2%) relative to persons receiving an IGRA (55.0%) or TST then IGRA (67.2%; p = 0.001). Those receiving an IGRA or a TST followed by an IGRA had higher odds of completion compared to those receiving a TST (aOR = 1.59 and 2.50; p = 0.017 and 0.001, respectively). Receiving an IGRA or a TST and subsequent IGRA was associated with increased treatment persistence relative to TST (aIRR = 1.14 and 1.25; p = 0.027 and 0.009, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: IGRA use is significantly associated with both higher levels of LTBI treatment completion and treatment persistence. These differences are apparent both when IGRAs alone were administered and when IGRAs were administered subsequent to a TST. Our results suggest that IGRAs contribute to more effective LTBI treatment and consequently individual and population protections against TB.