Fluralaner as a novel treatment for sarcoptic mange in the bare-nosed wombat (Vombatus ursinus): safety, pharmacokinetics, efficacy and practicable use.

BACKGROUND: Sarcoptic mange causes significant animal welfare and occasional conservation concerns for bare-nosed wombats (Vombatus ursinus) throughout their range. To date, in situ chemotherapeutic interventions have involved macrocytic lactones, but their short duration of action and need for frequent re-administration has limited treatment success. Fluralaner (Bravecto®; MSD Animal Health), a novel isoxazoline class ectoparasiticide, has several advantageous properties that may overcome such limitations. METHODS: Fluralaner was administered topically at 25 mg/kg (n = 5) and 85 mg/kg (n = 2) to healthy captive bare-nosed wombats. Safety was assessed over 12 weeks by clinical observation and monitoring of haematological and biochemical parameters. Fluralaner plasma pharmacokinetics were quantified using ultra-performance liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry. Efficacy was evaluated through clinical assessment of response to treatment, including mange and body condition scoring, for 15 weeks after topical administration of 25 mg/kg fluralaner to sarcoptic mange-affected wild bare-nosed wombats (n = 3). Duration of action was determined through analysis of pharmacokinetic parameters and visual inspection of study subjects for ticks during the monitoring period. Methods for diluting fluralaner to enable 'pour-on' application were compared, and an economic and treatment effort analysis of fluralaner relative to moxidectin was undertaken. RESULTS: No deleterious health impacts were detected following fluralaner administration. Fluralaner was absorbed and remained quantifiable in plasma throughout the monitoring period. For the 25 mg/kg and 85 mg/kg treatment groups, the respective means for maximum recorded plasma concentrations (Cmax) were 6.2 and 16.4 ng/ml; for maximum recorded times to Cmax, 3.0 and 37.5 days; and for plasma elimination half-lives, 40.1 and 166.5 days. Clinical resolution of sarcoptic mange was observed in all study animals within 3-4 weeks of treatment, and all wombats remained tick-free for 15 weeks. A suitable product for diluting fluralaner into a 'pour-on' was found. Treatment costs were competitive, and predicted treatment effort was substantially lower relative to moxidectin. CONCLUSIONS: Fluralaner appears to be a safe and efficacious treatment for sarcoptic mange in the bare-nosed wombat, with a single dose lasting over 1-3 months. It has economic and treatment-effort-related advantages over moxidectin, the most commonly used alternative. We recommend a dose of 25 mg/kg fluralaner and, based on the conservative assumption that at least 50% of a dose makes dermal contact, Bravecto Spot-On for Large Dogs as the most appropriate formulation for adult bare-nosed wombats.

Dopamine D2 receptor occupancy as a predictor of catalepsy in rats: a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling approach.

OBJECTIVES: Dopamine D2 receptor occupancy (D2RO) is the major determinant of efficacy and safety in schizophrenia drug therapy. Excessive D2RO (>80%) is known to cause catalepsy (CAT) in rats and extrapyramidal side effects (EPS) in human. The objective of this study was to use pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling tools to relate CAT with D2RO in rats and to compare that with the relationship between D2RO and EPS in humans. METHODS: Severity of CAT was assessed in rats at hourly intervals over a period of 8 h after antipsychotic drug treatment. An indirect response model with and without Markov elements was used to explain the relationship of D2RO and CAT. RESULTS: Both models explained the CAT data well for olanzapine, paliperidone and risperidone. However, only the model with the Markov elements predicted the CAT severity well for clozapine and haloperidol. The relationship between CAT scores in rat and EPS scores in humans was implemented in a quantitative manner. Risk of EPS not exceeding 10% over placebo correlates with less than 86% D2RO and less than 30% probability of CAT events in rats. CONCLUSION: A quantitative relationship between rat CAT and human EPS was elucidated and may be used in drug discovery to predict the risk of EPS in humans from D2RO and CAT scores measured in rats.

Assessment of interaction potential of AZD2066 using in vitro metabolism tools, physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling and in vivo cocktail data.

PURPOSE: Static and dynamic (PBPK) prediction models were applied to estimate the drug-drug interaction (DDI) risk of AZD2066. The predictions were compared to the results of an in vivo cocktail study. Various in vivo measures for tolbutamide as a probe agent for cytochrome P450 2C9 (CYP2C9) were also compared. METHODS: In vitro inhibition data for AZD2066 were obtained using human liver microsomes and CYP-specific probe substrates. DDI prediction was performed using PBPK modelling with the SimCYP simulator™ or static model. The cocktail study was an open label, baseline, controlled interaction study with 15 healthy volunteers receiving multiple doses of AD2066 for 12 days. A cocktail of single doses of 100 mg caffeine (CYP1A2 probe), 500 mg tolbutamide (CYP2C9 probe), 20 mg omeprazole (CYP2C19 probe) and 7.5 mg midazolam (CYP3A probe) was simultaneously applied at baseline and during the administration of AZD2066. Bupropion as a CYP2B6 probe (150 mg) and 100 mg metoprolol (CYP2D6 probe) were administered on separate days. The pharmacokinetic parameters for the probe drugs and their metabolites in plasma and urinary recovery were determined. RESULTS: In vitro AZD2066 inhibited CYP1A2, CYP2B6, CYP2C9, CYP2C19 and CYP2D6. The static model predicted in vivo interaction with predicted AUC ratio values of >1.1 for all CYP (except CYP3A4). The PBPK simulations predicted no risk for clinical relevant interactions. The cocktail study showed no interaction for the CYP2B6 and CYP2C19 enzymes, a possible weak inhibition of CYP1A2, CYP2C9 and CYP3A4 activities and a slight inhibition (29 %) of CYP2D6 activity. The tolbutamide phenotyping metrics indicated that there were significant correlations between CLform and AUCTOL, CL, Aemet and LnTOL24h. The MRAe in urine showed no correlation to CLform. CONCLUSIONS: DDI prediction using the static approach based on total concentration indicated that AZD20066 has a potential risk for inhibition. However, no DDI risk could be predicted when a more in vivo-like dynamic prediction method with the PBPK with SimCYP™ software based on early human PK data was used and more parameters (i.e. free fraction in plasma, no DDI risk) were taken into account. The clinical cocktail study showed no or low risks for clinical relevant DDI interactions. Our findings are in line with the hypothesis that the dynamic prediction method predicts DDI in vivo in humans better than the static model based on total plasma concentrations.

Relative bioavailability and pharmacokinetic comparison of two 2-mg risperidone tablet formulations: A single dose, randomized-sequence, double-blind, 2-way crossover study in healthy male volunteers in Thailand.

BACKGROUND: Data regarding the pharmacokinetic properties of risperidone in the Thai population are limited. A new generic tablet formulation was recently developed, but bioequivalence research is necessary to obtain marketing authorization for it in Thailand. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the pharmacokinetic properties of risperidone and its active metabolite, 9-hydroxyrisperidone (which reportedly contributes to the drug's pharmacodynamic effects), in a newly developed generic tablet formulation (test) and a branded formulation (reference) in healthy, fasting, male Thai volunteers. METHODS: A single-dose, randomized-sequence, double-blind, 2-way crossover design was used in this study. The study took place from October 21 through November 28, 2007. After a ≥10-hour overnight fast, volunteers were orally administered one 2-mg risperidone tablet, either the test formulation (Condrug International Company, Ltd.) or the reference formulation-according to the randomization schedule-followed by a 14-day washout period and administration of the alternate formulation. Blood samples were collected over a period of 96 hours. Risperidone and 9-hydroxyrisperidone plasma concentrations were simultaneously determined using a validated HPLC/ion trap mass spectrometry method. The plasma concentration-time curves of the active moiety, risperidone, and 9-hydroxyrisperidone were generated for each volunteer, from which the C(max), T(max), AUC0₋(last), AUC0₋(∞), and t(½) were determined using noncompartmental analysis. The effects of formulation, period, sequence, and subject (within sequence) on pharmacokinetic parameters were analyzed using ANOVA. According to regulatory requirements set forth by Thailand, the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, and the US Food and Drug Administration, products meet the criteria for bioequivalence if the 90% CIs of the treatment ratios for C(max) and AUC are within the range of 0.80 to 1.25. Tolerability was assessed by patient interview, monitoring vital signs (ie, resting blood pressure, heart rate, body temperature), physical examination, and laboratory tests (ie, urinalysis, hematology, blood chemistry) before and after the study. RESULTS: A total of 22 Thai male volunteers (mean [SD] age, 28.18 [8.27] years [range, 20.62-44.19 years]; weight, 62.43 [4.76] kg [range, 55.03-76.02 kg]; and body mass index, 21.76 [2.07] kg/m² [range, 18.9924.91 kg/m²]) completed the study. The mean (SD) relative bioavailabilities of test to reference formulations determined from AUC of the active moiety, risperidone, and 9-hydroxyrisperidone were 1.06 (0.18), 1.07 (0.29), and 1.04 (0.17), respectively. The ANOVA suggested no statistically significant effect of formulation, period, or sequence on the studied pharmacokinetic parameters of the active moiety, risperidone, or 9-hydroxyrisperidone. The 90% CIs for the natural logarithm-transformed ratios of C(max), AUC0₋(last), and AUC0₋(∞) were as follows: for active moiety, 0.94 to 1.03, 0.98 to 1.11, and 0.98 to 1.10, respectively; for risperidone, 0.90 to 1.10, 0.96 to 1.13, and 0.96 to 1.14, respectively; and for 9-hydroxyrisperidone, 0.91 to 1.03, 0.97 to 1.10, and 0.96 to 1.09, respectively. All met the criteria for bioequivalence. The most commonly reported adverse events (AEs) were somnolence (100.0%), orthostatic hypotension (13.6%), headache (4.5%), and syncope (2.3%). AEs were mild and disappeared within 1 day. No volunteers withdrew from the study because of AEs. CONCLUSIONS: The single-dose pharmacokinetic data in this small, all-male, selected sample of fasting, healthy volunteers met Thailand's regulatory criteria for assuming bioequivalence of the tested generic and reference 2-mg risperidone tablets. Both formulations were well tolerated.

Iloperidone: a new benzisoxazole atypical antipsychotic drug. Is it novel enough to impact the crowded atypical antipsychotic market?

Iloperidone is a new-generation atypical antipsychotic agent, acting as a serotonin/dopamine (5-HT(2A)/D(2)) antagonist, under development by Vanda Pharmaceuticals for the treatment of schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and other psychiatric conditions. Chemically, iloperidone is a benzisoxazole, like risperidone, and shows a multiple receptor binding profile, sharing this feature with the other atypical antipsychotic agents. Administered orally, the drug is highly bound to plasma proteins and extensively metabolised. Several clinical trials have been carried out, to check efficacy, safety and side effects. In order to introduce iloperidone as an agent for the treatment of schizophrenia, a short overview of the disease and of the most important antipsychotic drugs available or under development will be reported. Iloperidone pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics are presented herein, together with an evaluation of clinical safety and efficacy results.

[Development and identifiability analysis of parent-metabolite pharmacokinetic model for risperidone and its main active metabolite 9-hydroxyrisperidone].

To develop a parent-metabolite pharmacokinetic model for risperidone (RIP) and its major active metabolite (9-hydroxyrisperidone) and investigate their pharmacokinetics characteristics in healthy male volunteers, twenty-two healthy volunteers were orally given a single dose of 2 mg RIP. Plasma samples were collected in the period of 96 hours and concentrations of RIP and 9-hydroxyrisperidone were measured by a validated HPLC/MS method. CYP2D6 phenotypes were identified by the T1/2 of RIP and 9-hydroxyrisperidone according to the literature. Model structure identifiability analysis was performed by the similarity transformation approach to investigate whether the unknown parameters of the proposed model could be estimated from the designed experiment. Pharmacokinetics parameters were estimated using weighted least squares method, and the final pharmacokinetics model were tested and evaluated by Monte Carlo simulation. Eighteen volunteers were phenotyped as extensive metabolizers (EM) and four volunteers were identified as intermediate metabolizers (IM). The final model included central and peripheral compartment for both parent (RIP) and metabolite (9-hydroxyrisperidone) respectively. Model structure identifiability analysis indicated that the proposed model was local identifiable. However, if the ratio of RIP converted to 9-hydroxyrisperidone was assumed to be 32% in EM, and 22% in IM, the model could be globally identifiable. The predicted time-concentration curve and AUC(0-t), C(max), T(max) of RIP and 9-hydroxyrisperidone estimated by the established model were in agreement with the observations and noncompartment analysis. Rate constant of RIP conversion to 9-hydroxyrisperidone was (0.12 +/- 0.08) h(-1) and (0.014 +/- 0.007) h(-1) for EM and IM, respectively. Elimination rate constants of RIP were (0.25 +/- 0.18) and (0.05 +/- 0.23) h(-1) for EM and IM, respectively. Model validation result showed that all parameters derived from the concentration data fitted well with the theoretical value, with mean prediction error of most PK parameter within +/- 15%. The established model well defined the disposition of RIP and 9-hydroxyrisperidone simultaneously and showed large inter-individual pharmacokinetics variation in different CYP2D6 phenotype. The model also provide a useful approach to characterize pharmacokinetics of other parent-metabolite drugs.

Zonisamide: new drug. No advantage in refractory partial epilepsy.

(1) The first-line treatment for patients with partial epilepsy is carbamazepine monotherapy. Second-line options include monotherapy with valproic acid, gabapentin, lamotrigine or oxcarbazepine. Other antiepileptics are also available for combination therapy of refractory partial epilepsy. (2) Zonisamide is a sulphonamide derivative that inhibits carbonic anhydrase; it resembles topiramate, a drug already approved for use for this indication in the European Union. (3) The main clinical trial, a double-blind study lasting 36 weeks, compared the addition of zonisamide or placebo to ongoing treatment in 351 patients with refractory partial epilepsy. The "response rate" (the proportion of patients with at least a 50% reduction in the frequency of seizures) was significantly higher with zonisamide plus the previous treatment than with placebo plus the previous treatment (46.6% versus 17.6%). An indirect comparison suggests that this is no better than treatment with a second-line antiepileptic drug. (4) Results of three other placebo-controlled trials of third-line combinations in a total of 499 patients treated for 12 weeks were similar. (5) The main adverse effects of zonisamide are those typically seen with topiramate: neuropsychological disorders and disorders due to carbonic anhydrase inhibition (kidney stones, reduced perspiration, and hyperthermia). There are various other adverse effects, including a risk of severe skin rash. (6) The profile of interactions is complex. There is a risk of pharmacokinetic interactions, and of pharmacodynamic interactions with other carbonic anhydrase inhibitors. (7) In France, treatment with zonisamide costs nearly 20 times more than treatment with carbamazepine or valproic acid. (8) Zonisamide has no therapeutic advantages over other antiepileptics available for combination therapy of partial epilepsy.

Population pharmacokinetics of the active metabolite of leflunomide in pediatric subjects with polyarticular course juvenile rheumatoid arthritis.

Leflunomide is a pyrimidine synthesis inhibitor used in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Data from two clinical studies were used to establish a population pharmacokinetic (PPK) model for the active metabolite (M1) of leflunomide in patients with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (JRA) and determine appropriate pediatric doses. Seventy-three subjects 3-17 years of age provided 674 M1 concentrations. The PPK model was derived from nonlinear mixed-effects modeling and qualified by cross-study evaluation and predictive check. A one-compartment model with first-order input described M1 PPK well. Body weight (WT) correlated weakly with oral clearance (CL/F = 0.020.[WT/40](0.430)) and strongly with volume of distribution (V/F = 5.8.[WT/40](0.769)). Steady-state concentrations (C(ss)) of M1 in JRA were compared for a variety of leflunomide dose regimens using Monte-Carlo simulation. To achieve comparable C(ss) values in pediatric patients with JRA to that in adult patients, doses of leflunomide should be adjusted modestly: 10 mg/d for 10-20 kg, 15 mg/d for 20-40 kg, and 20 mg/d for > 40 kg.

Leflunomide: long-term clinical experience and new uses.

Leflunomide (Arava, Aventis Pharmaceuticals) is an oral pyrimidine synthesis inhibitor with immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory activity. This agent has demonstrated significant efficacy in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis in randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. Both the efficacy and safety of leflunomide are maintained with long-term administration in patients with RA. Leflunomide compares favourably with other biological and non-biological agents used to treat RA in the incidence of adverse events and serious adverse events. Economic studies indicate that leflunomide is a cost-effective option in the treatment of RA. New investigations with leflunomide have focused mainly on combination regimens for the treatment of RA and the use of leflunomide in other inflammatory or autoimmune disorders.

Simultaneous assessment of drug interactions with low- and high-extraction opioids: application to parecoxib effects on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of fentanyl and alfentanil.

BACKGROUND: Parecoxib is a parenteral cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor intended for perioperative analgesia. It is an inactive prodrug hydrolyzed in vivo to the active inhibitor valdecoxib, a substrate for hepatic cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4); hence, a potential exists for metabolic interactions with other CYP3A substrates. This study determined the effects of parecoxib on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the CYP3A substrates fentanyl and alfentanil compared with the CYP3A inhibitor troleandomycin. Alfentanil is a low-extraction drug with a clearance that is highly susceptible to drug interactions; fentanyl is a high-extraction drug and, thus, is theoretically less vulnerable. We therefore also tested the hypothesis that the extraction ratio influences the consequence of altered hepatic metabolism of these opioids. METHODS: After Institutional Review Board-approved, written, informed consent was obtained, 12 22- to 40-yr-old healthy volunteers were enrolled in the study. The protocol was a randomized, double-blinded, balanced, placebo-controlled, three-session (placebo, parecoxib, or troleandomycin pretreatment) crossover. Subjects received both alfentanil (15 microg/kg) and fentanyl (5 microg/kg; 15-min intravenous infusion) 1 h after placebo, parecoxib (40 mg intravenously every 12 h), or troleandomycin (every 6 h). Study sessions were separated by 7 or more days. Opioid concentrations in venous blood were determined by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined by noncompartmental analysis. Opioid effects were determined by pupillometry, respiratory rate, and Visual Analog Scale scores. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the placebo and parecoxib treatments in alfentanil or fentanyl plasma concentration, maximum observed plasma concentration, area under the plasma time-concentration time curve, clearance, elimination half-life, or volume of distribution. However, disposition of alfentanil, and to a lesser extent fentanyl, was significantly altered by troleandomycin. Clearances were reduced to 12% (0.64 +/- 0.25 ml. kg-1. min-1) and 61% (9.35 +/- 3.07) of control (5.53 +/- 2.16 and 15.3 +/- 5.0) for alfentanil and fentanyl (P < 0.001). Pupil diameter versus time curves were similar between placebo and parecoxib treatments but were significantly different after troleandomycin. CONCLUSIONS: Single-dose parecoxib does not alter fentanyl or alfentanil disposition or clinical effects and does not appear to cause significant CYP3A drug interactions. CYP3A inhibition decreases alfentanil clearance more than fentanyl clearance, confirming that the extraction ratio influences the consequence of altered hepatic drug metabolism. Modified cassette, or "cocktail," dosing is useful for assessing drug interactions in humans.

Prediction and assessment of extrapyramidal side effects induced by risperidone based on dopamine D(2) receptor occupancy.

In the present study, we attempted to predict the risk of extrapyramidal side effects of a selective monoaminergic antagonist, risperidone, by analyzing the correlation between the dopamine D(2) receptor occupancy and the degree of extrapyramidal side effects of the drug. The occupancies of D(2) and 5-HT(2) receptors at various doses of risperidone were calculated by means of a receptor occupancy theory. The extrapyramidal side effects after administration of risperidone were attempted to predict by theoretical analysis of the correlation between the calculated occupancies and the evidence of extrapyramidal symptoms using a ternary complex model. The pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis utilized the data concerning the pharmacokinetics of risperidone and 9-hydroxyrisperidone (active metabolite), their binding affinities with D(2) and 5-HT(2) receptors, and the clinical evidence of extrapyramidal symptoms (Extrapyramidal Symptom Rating Scale: ESRS), gathered from the literature. The mean occupancy of 5-HT(2) receptors after the administration of regular doses of risperidone was suggested to be more than 90%, whereas the mean occupancy of D(2) receptors varied between 50-80%, depending on the dose. The correlation between the occupancy of D(2) receptors and the extrapyramidal symptoms could be successfully analyzed with a ternary complex model, showing the predictability of the model for the extrapyramidal side effects of risperidone. Since the estimated risk of the extrapyramidal side effects varied with the dose, the present method of predicting the extrapyramidal side effects of risperidone may provide a basis for developing a rational dosing regimen for the drug.

Leflunomide: a novel DMARD for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

Leflunomide (Arava(trade mark), Hoescht Marion Roussel, now Aventis Pharma) is a new, oral disease modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) for the treatment of active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). It is a novel isoxazole derivative, which has shown both anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties. Leflunomide primarily acts by inhibiting the de novo synthesis of pyrimidine nucleotides (and consequently DNA and RNA) in immune response cells, particularly activated T-cells. It also inhibits tyrosine kinases, with a subsequent reduction in the pro-inflammatory cytokines, TNF and IL-1. Leflunomide is significantly more effective than placebo and equivalent to sulfasalazine and methotrexate in short-term (26 - 52 week) studies, as measured by American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria. It has shown significant improvements in functional disability and health related quality of life and has consistently been shown to slow radiographic progression of RA. Leflunomide has a rapid onset of action (within 4 weeks) which is significantly faster than placebo and sulfasalazine. Leflunomide was well-tolerated in clinical trials with no serious adverse effects occurring. The most common side effects were gastrointestinal disturbances, reversible alopecia, rash, hypertension and abnormal liver function tests. Most of these were mild to moderate and resolved without any complications. In summary leflunomide is an effective and well-tolerated DMARD that is a welcome addition to the currently available DMARDs for the treatment of this disabling condition.

An assessment of iloperidone for the treatment of schizophrenia.

Iloperidone (Novartis' Zomariltrade mark) is an atypical antipsychotic agent for the treatment of schizophrenia. Current trends in the treatment of schizophrenia indicate that some atypical antipsychotics are being recommended as first-line therapy. Atypical antipsychotics, in addition to being dopamine (D) receptor antagonists, are all relatively potent serotonin (5-HT) receptor antagonists and are less likely than conventional dopamine antagonists to induce movement disorders. However, all of these agents differ in their receptor profiles and clinical profiles. Iloperidone, a benzisoxazole, is a mixed 5-HT(2A)/D(2)antagonist. Iloperidone was found to be more potent than its analogues when compared with haloperidol in antagonising climbing behaviour in mice. Iloperidone is extensively metabolised and the main circulating metabolite is reduced iloperidone. In patients treated with iloperidone, a low incidence of extrapyramidal symptoms and weight gain has been shown. Data from Phase II trials demonstrated efficacy in patients at doses of 8 mg/day and tolerability was good up to 32 mg/day. Phase III prospective, double-blind, randomised trials with iloperidone are in progress under the ZEUS (Zomariltrade mark Efficacy Utility and Safety) programme involving 3300 patients. Iloperidone, with a balance of activity at the dopaminergic and serotonergic receptors, has obvious advantages over clozapine and olanzapine, both of which have a similar receptor profile as they favour serotonergic over dopamine receptors. Iloperidone is likely to reach the market in 2001 and has favourable prospects in the atypical antipsychotic market for schizophrenia, which is expanding from US$ 1.5 billion in 2000 to US$ 3 billion in 2005.

Developmental and therapeutic pharmacology of antiepileptic drugs.

We investigated the clinical effects and plasma levels of zonisamide (ZNS) in children with cryptogenic localization-related epilepsies. ZNS is absorbed slowly from the gastrointestinal tract, and its biological half-life is long as compared with that of other common antiepileptic drugs. The peak-to-trough plasma level ratios during a day were as small as 1.28 +/- 0.15 in children taking a daily dose of 8 mg/kg of ZNS once a day as a single drug. The plasma level (microg/ml) to dose (mg/kg/day) ratios estimated by the trough and peak plasma levels both increased with advancing age, but the peak-to-trough plasma level ratios were maintained almost uniformly throughout the pediatric age period. A wide range of the plasma levels was associated with complete freedom from seizures. The range of the plasma levels in patients who did not respond to ZNS was higher than that in the controlled group. However, the clinical effects of ZNS were in agreement with the range of generally accepted therapeutic plasma levels of ZNS, 15-40 microg/ml. Any patient who receives polytherapy is at risk to develop 1 or more drug interactions. Concurrent administration of carbamazepine (CBZ) decreases plasma concentrations of ZNS. However, ZNS does not alter plasma concentrations of CBZ or its primary metabolite, carbamazepine-10,11-epoxide (CBZ-E). It is evident that the concurrent administration of lamotrigine (LTG) affects plasma concentrations of CBZ-E, while plasma CBZ levels remain unaltered. However, the effect of LTG on plasma concentrations of CBZ-E is small, and none of the study patients showed toxic plasma concentrations of CBZ-E or associated clinical toxicity. Drug-protein binding interactions are another source of side effects. A simultaneous administration of valproic acid increases the total plasma CBZ-E levels relative to the CBZ dose associated with the raised free fractions of CBZ and CBZ-E. The high free plasma concentrations of CBZ-E above 1.5 microg/ml may be responsible for the side effects.

An assessment of zonisamide as an anti-epileptic drug.

A brief review of epilepsy as a disease, anti-epileptic drugs and methods of evaluation of anti-epileptic drugs are presented as a background for assessment of zonisamide, which has been approved by the FDA as add-on therapy for the treatment of partial seizures with or without secondary generalisation in adults. Chemically, zonisamide is classified as a sulphonamide and is unrelated to other anti-epileptic drugs. The mode of action of zonisamide remains unclear, but likely mechanisms are blockade of sodium and T-type calcium channels. It is also shown to have some neuroprotective effect against hypoxia and ischaemia. It has a liner pharmacokinetics with excellent oral bioavailability. Zonisamide has been approved for use in Japan for ten years prior to approval in USA and Europe. Clinical experience with zonisamide in Japan has documented its efficacy in the treatment of partial seizures (partial-onset generalised tonic-clonic, simple partial and/or complex partial seizures) and to a more variable extent, generalised tonic-clonic, generalised tonic (mainly seen in symptomatic generalised epilepsies including Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome) and compound/combination seizures. The efficacy and safety was confirmed in trials conducted in USA and Europe in adults as well as children. Zonisamide compares favourably with other newly introduced drugs and has the potential for development as a monotherapy for epilepsy.

Risperidone: review and assessment of its role in the treatment of schizophrenia.

OBJECTIVE: To review pharmacologic, pharmacokinetic, therapeutic, and safety information for the antipsychotic agent risperidone and to evaluate its place in the treatment of schizophrenia. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE and Exerpta Medica databases; Janssen Pharmaceuticals; Food and Drug Administration Psychopharmacology Advisory Committee; PJB Publications; published articles and abstracts; unpublished research reports and abstracts. STUDY SELECTION: In vivo animal studies (pharmacology); volunteer studies (pharmacokinetics); clinical case reports, open clinical studies, and controlled clinical studies (clinical efficacy and adverse effects; long-term studies; studies in special populations. DATA EXTRACTION: Relevant data were extracted from published and unpublished source documents, evaluated, and summarized in tables for comparative review. Abstracts were used in 6 of 8 pharmacokinetic studies, 4 of 8 open clinical studies, and 2 of 9 controlled clinical studies. Use of abstracts limits the extent of data extracted. DATA SYNTHESIS: Risperidone is an effective treatment for positive symptoms of schizophrenia and may be effective for negative symptoms. Efficacy in treatment-resistant patients is inconclusive. In patients in whom low-to-moderate dosage is effective, there should be fewer and less severe adverse effects with risperidone than with haloperidol. Optimal dosage for schizophrenia appears to be 6 mg/d. Although data are limited, risperidone may be toxic on overdose. CONCLUSIONS: Risperidone is a useful addition to the antipsychotic drug armamentarium, but it should be viewed as an atypical antipsychotic agent. It is reasonable to consider a trial of risperidone in treatment-resistant schizophrenic patients prior to the use of clozapine and as a first-line treatment for newly diagnosed patients with schizophrenia.

A risk-benefit assessment of risperidone in schizophrenia.

The atypical antipsychotic risperidone combines dopaminergic and serotonergic antagonism. This results in a drug that is both clinically effective, reducing positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia, and has a low incidence of adverse effects. At a dosage of 4 to 8 mg/day, risperidone is comparable to 10 mg/day of haloperidol. This dosage has a low incidence of extrapyramidal adverse effects and is nonsedative, although it may cause orthostatic hypotension. There is no current evidence for specific biochemical and haematological abnormalities associated with risperidone. Although the clinical benefits appear to outweigh the risks, this drug continues to be a relatively expensive treatment option in the UK. There is therefore a need for a formal cost-utility assessment of risperidone and for comparisons between this drug and other atypical neuroleptics.